Hostname: page-component-669899f699-qzcqf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T15:34:29.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The AKP’s clientelist–machine politics and the role of Kurdish brokers: the case of Bağcılar

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2024

İbrahim Kuran Open the ORCID record for İbrahim Kuran [Opens in a new window]
İbrahim Kuran*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Faculty of Political Sciences, İstanbul Medeniyet University, Kadıköy, İstanbul
*
Email: ibrahim.kuran@medeniyet.edu.tr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although there are numerous studies showing the significance of clientelism in the electoral mobilization of the poor in Turkey, scant attention has been paid on the specific clientelistic strategies employed by the Justice and Development Party (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi; AKP) among the Kurdish population in İstanbul. Addressing this gap, this study focuses on the AKP’s clientelist politics among Kurdish voters in Bağcılar, a lower-income district on the European side of İstanbul. Drawing on fieldwork, this study argues that the AKP successfully mobilizes Kurdish voters through machine politics and relational clientelism, which are facilitated by co-ethnic brokerage and intermediary linkages. By analyzing different modalities of Kurdish brokers – Kurdish (male) entrepreneurs, Kurdish housewives and Kurdish associations – the study discloses the intricate dynamics of the AKP’s clientelist–machine politics at the local level. It reveals that the AKP’s co-ethnic brokers not only distribute material benefits but also cultivate enduring personal relationships with Kurdish voters, providing problem-solving networks for the Kurdish poor in everyday life. The AKP’s co-ethnic brokerage relations foster trust, care, solidarity, and affectivity among Kurds. The study concludes that the AKP employs both material and symbolic dimensions of clientelism to mobilize the Kurdish electorate in İstanbul.

Keywords

Adalet ve Kalkınma PartisiAKPmachine politicsrelational clientelismKurdish brokersİstanbul
Type
Article
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 71 , November 2024 , pp. 121 - 142
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of New Perspectives on Turkey

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References

Arıkan Akdağ, G (2015) Ethnicity and Elections in Turkey: Party Politics and the Mobilization of Swing Voters. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Arıkan Akdağ, G (2016) Rational political parties and electoral games: the AKP’s strategic move for the Kurdish vote in Turkey. Turkish Studies 17(1), 126–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ark-Yıldırım, C (2017) Political parties and grassroots clientelist strategies in urban Turkey: one neighborhood at a time. South European Society and Politics 22(4), 473–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arslantaş, D and Arslantaş, Ş (2022) How does clientelism foster electoral dominance? Evidence from Turkey. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics 7(3), 559–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auyero, J (2001) Poor People’s Politics: Peronist Survival Networks and The Legacy of Evita. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Auyero, J (2012) Poor people’s lives and politics: the things a political ethnographer knows (and doesn’t know) after 15 years of fieldwork. New Perspectives on Turkey 46, 95–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auyero, J (2014) Lessons learned while studying clientelistic politics in the gray zone. In Brun, DA and Diamond, L (eds), Clientelism, Social Policy and the Quality of Democracy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 114–129.Google Scholar
Ayata, S (1996) Patronage, party, and state: the politicization of Islam in Turkey. Middle East Journal 50(1), 40–56.Google Scholar
Aytaç, SE (2014) Distributive politics in a multiparty system: the Conditional Cash Transfer program in Turkey. Comparative Political Studies 47(9), 1211–1237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilecen, H (2015) The determinants of voting behavior in Turkey. PhD Dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of Houston, Texas.Google Scholar
Birelma, A (2019) Working-class entrepreneurialism: perceptions, aspirations, and experiences of petty entrepreneurship among male manual workers in Turkey. New Perspectives on Turkey 61, 45–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çarkoğlu, A and Aytaç, SE (2015) Who gets targeted for vote-buying? Evidence from an augmented list experiment in Turkey. European Political Science Review 7(4), 547–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çiçek, C (2016) The Kurds of Turkey: National, Religious and Economic Identities. London and New York: I.B.Tauris.Google Scholar
Cinar, K (2016) Local determinants of an emerging electoral hegemony: the case of Justice and Development Party (AKP) in Turkey. Democratization 23(7), 1216–1235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doğan, S (2017) Mahalledeki AKP: Parti İşleyişi, Taban Mobilizasyonu ve Siyasal Yabancılaşma. İstanbul: İletişim.Google Scholar
Eligür, B (2010) The Mobilization of Political Islam in Turkey. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bağı, Gönül (2023) Biz Kimiz. Available at https://web.archive.org/web/20230401071014/https://gonulbagi.org/hakkimizda/ (accessed 27 September 2020).Google Scholar
Grigoriadis, IN and Dilek, E (2018) Struggling for the Kurdish vote: religion, ethnicity and victimhood in AKP and BDP/HDP rally speeches. Middle Eastern Studies 54(2), 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Günay, O and Yörük, E (2019) Governing ethnic unrest: political Islam and the Kurdish conflict in Turkey. New Perspectives on Turkey 61, 9–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Güneş-Ayata, A (1994) Clientelism: premodern, modern, postmodern. In Roniger, L and Güneş-Ayata, A (eds), Democracy, Clientelism and Civil Society. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagene, T (2015) Political clientelism in Mexico: bridging the gap between citizens and the state. Latin American Politics and Society 57(1), 139–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2015.00259.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, AC and Palmer-Rubin, B (2015) Beyond the machine: clientelist brokers and interest organizations in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies 48(9), 1186–1223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
İstanbul Metropolitan Municipality (2023) Map of İstanbul. Available at https://sehirharitasi.ibb.gov.tr/ (accessed 5 December 2023).Google Scholar
Jongerden, J (2019) Conquering the state and subordinating society under AKP rule: a Kurdish perspective on the development of a new autocracy in Turkey. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 21(3), 260–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalaycı, H (2023) Ethnic and Islamist populism in Turkey and its impact on Kurdish nationalism. Nations and Nationalism 29(2), 734–750. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keyder, Ç (2004) The Turkish bell jar. New Left Review, July/August 2014. Available at https://newleftreview.org/issues/II28/articles/caglar-keyder-the-turkish-bell-jar (accessed 27 September 2023).Google Scholar
Kemahlıoğlu, Ö (2012) Agents or Bosses? Patronage and Intra-Party Politics in Argentina and Turkey. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Koster, M and Eiró, F (2022) Clientelism in Northeast Brazil: brokerage within and outside electoral times. Contemporary Social Science 17(3), 222–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Küçük, B (2019) The burden of Sisyphus: a sociological inventory of the Kurdish question in Turkey. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 46(5), 752–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Küçük, B and Türkmen, B (2020) Remaking the public through the square: invention of the new national cosmology in Turkey. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 47(2), 247–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuran, İ (2020) The political economy of Kurdish voting behavior: the case of İstanbul’s Bağcılar District. PhD Dissertation, Department of Political Science and International Relations, Boğaziçi University, İstanbul.Google Scholar
Levitsky, S (2003) From labor politics to machine politics: the transformation of party–union linkages in Argentine Peronism, 1983–1999. Latin American Research Review 38(3), 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merkezi Dağitim Sistemi (2023) Population data. Available at https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?kn=95&locale=tr (accessed 5 December 2023).Google Scholar
Ministry of Interior (2022) Associations by province and field of activity. Available at https://www.siviltoplum.gov.tr/illere-ve-faaliyet-alanlarina-gore-dernekler (accessed 27 September 2023).Google Scholar
Nichter, S (2018) Votes for Survival: Relational Clientelism in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérouse, J-F (2016) Kurds of İstanbul: a blurred identity. Repair, 5 October 2016. Available at https://repairfuture.net/index.php/en/identity-other-standpoint/kurds-of-istanbul-a-blurred-identity (accessed 27 September 2023).Google Scholar
Sayarı, S (2011) Clientelism and patronage in Turkish politics and society. In Birtek, F and Toprak, B (eds), The Post-Modern Abyss and the New Politics of Islam: Essays in Honor of Şerif Mardin. İstanbul: Bilgi University Press, 81–94.Google Scholar
Sayarı, S (2014) Interdisciplinary approaches to political clientelism and patronage in Turkey. Turkish Studies 15(4), 655–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarigil, Z (2010) Curbing Kurdish ethno-nationalism in Turkey: an empirical assessment of pro-Islamic and socio-economic approaches. Ethnic and Racial Studies 33(3), 533–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarigil, Z and Fazlioglu, O (2013) Religion and ethno-nationalism: Turkey’s Kurdish issue. Nations and Nationalism 19(3), 551–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, JC (1969) Corruption, machine politics, and political change. American Political Science Review 63(4), 1142–1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, SC, Dunning, T and Nazareno, M (2013) Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Şahin, O (2021) How populists securitize elections to win them: the 2015 double elections in Turkey. New Perspectives on Turkey 64, 7–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunar, I (1990) Populism and patronage: the Demokrat Party and its legacy in Turkey. Il Politico 55(4), 745–757.Google Scholar
Tafolar, M (2015) Buying support without brokers: conditional cash transfers in Turkey and Argentina. PhD dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Yüksek Seçim Kurulu, T.C. (2019) Ballot box results and minutes. Available at https://sonuc.ysk.gov.tr/ (accessed 5 December 2023).Google Scholar
Temurçin, K (2012) Bağcılar (İstanbul) ilçesi’nde sanayinin gelişimi ve yapisı. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 26, 105–123.Google Scholar
Tilly, C (2006) Afterword: political ethnography as art and science. Qualitative Sociology 29, 409–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TURKSTAT (2022) Address-based population results. Available at http://tuik.gov.tr (accessed 20 June 2022).Google Scholar
White, J (2002) Islamist Mobilization in Turkey: A Study in Vernacular Politics. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Şafak, Yeni (2017) İstanbul’daki belediyeler yoksulların umudu oldu. 27 December 2017. Available at https://www.yenisafak.com/gundem/istanbuldaki-belediyeler-yoksullarin-umudu-oldu-2937700 (accessed 27 September 2023).Google Scholar
Yıldırım, K (2017) Personalistic linkages and persuasion in Turkish party politics. In Ersoy, M and Ozyurek, E (eds), Contemporary Turkey at a Glance II: Turkey Transformed? Power, History, Culture. Wiesbaden: Springer, 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yıldırım, K (2020) Clientelism and dominant incumbent parties: party competition in an urban Turkish neighbourhood. Democratization 27(1), 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yılmaz, B (2014) Mersin’de mekansal ayrışma ve denge siyaseti -ya da- Mersin neden patlamıyor? Birikim 301, 55–66.Google Scholar
Yörük, E (2014) Neoliberal hegemony and grassroots politics: the Islamist and Kurdish movements. In Akça, İ, Bekmen, A and Özden, B (eds), Turkey Reframed: Constituting Neoliberal Hegemony. London: Pluto Press, 234–246.Google Scholar
Yükseker, D (2009) Neoliberal restructuring and social exclusion in Turkey. In Onis, Z and Senses, F (eds), Turkey and the Global Economy: Neo-Liberal Restructuring and Integration in the Post-Crisis Era. New York: Routledge, 262–280.Google Scholar
Zarazaga, R (2014) Brokers beyond clientelism: a new perspective through the Argentine case. Latin American Politics and Society 56(3), 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Interviews

Behice (45 years, Malatya), Kurdish housewife and AKP broker, 8 July 2018Google Scholar
Dilan (32 years, Tatvan), industrial engineer and HDP activist, 4 January 2016Google Scholar
Emel (40 years, Malatya), Kurdish housewife and AKP neighborhood officer/broker, 9 July 2018Google Scholar
Gökhan, AKP’s Social Affairs Officer in Bağcılar, 25 May 2015Google Scholar
Kemal (50 years, Bitlis), Kurdish shopkeeper and AKP broker, 8 August 2018Google Scholar
Refika (35 years, Bitlis), Kurdish housewife and AKP neighborhood officer/broker, 7 July 2018Google Scholar
Sabir (50 years, Elazığ), Kurdish businessman and AKP broker, 27 May 2018Google Scholar