Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:54:40.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2021

Jakob Skovgaard
Jakob Skovgaard
Affiliation:
Lunds Universitet, Sweden

Summary

A summary is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Chapter
Information
The Economisation of Climate Change
How the G20, the OECD and the IMF Address Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Climate Finance
 , pp. 241 - 270
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/

References

Abbott, K. W. (2014). Strengthening the transnational regime complex for climate change. Transnational Environmental Law, 3(1), 57–88.Google Scholar
Abbott, K. W. and Gartner, D. (2011). The Green Climate Fund and the future of environmental governance. Lund and Amsterdam: Earth System Governance Working Paper 16.Google Scholar
Abbott, K. W., Green, J. F. and Keohane, R. O. (2016). Organizational ecology and institutional change in global governance. International Organization, 70(2), 247–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adelle, C. and Russel, D. (2013). Climate policy integration: A case of déjà vu? Environmental Policy and Governance, 23(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
Aldy, J. (2017). Policy surveillance in the G-20 fossil fuel subsidies agreement: Lessons for climate policy. Climatic Change, 144(1), 97–110.Google Scholar
Allison, G. and Zelikow, P. (1999). Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, 2nd ed. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Alvial-Palavicino, C. and Ureta, S. (2017). Economizing justice: Turning equity claims into lower energy tariffs in Chile. Energy Policy, 105, 642–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, E. Ø. (2016). Kina åbner for mere overvågning på klimaområdet. Politiken, 12 September.Google Scholar
APEC. (2009). Leaders’ Declaration. Available at: www.apec.org/Meeting-Papers/Leaders-Declarations/2009/2009_aelmGoogle Scholar
Arze del Granado, C. F. J. D. and Gillingham, R. (2012). The unequal benefits of fuel subsidies: A review of evidence for developing countries. World Development, 40(11), 2234–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aslanbeigui, N. and Medema, S. G. (1998). Beyond the dark clouds: Pigou and Coase on social cost. History of Political Economy, 30(4), 601–25.Google Scholar
Asmelash, H. B. (2017). Phasing out fossil fuel subsidies in the G20: Progress, challenges, and ways forward. Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development. Available at: www.greengrowthknowledge.org/sites/default/files/downloads/resource/Phasing%20Out%20Fossil%20Fuel%20Subsidies%20in%20the%20G20_Progress,%20Challenges,%20and%20Ways%20Forward.pdfGoogle Scholar
Attenborough, D. and Lagarde, C. (2019a). The greatest balancing act: Nature and the global economy. Finance and Development, 56(4), 22–5.Google Scholar
Attenborough, D. and Lagarde, C. (2019b). Nature is our capital. Podcast, IMF.Google Scholar
Atteridge, A., Savvidou, G., Meintrup, L., Dzebo, A., Sadowski, S. and Gortana, F. (2019). Aid Atlas. Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI).Google Scholar
Aykut, S. C. (2016). Taking a wider view on climate governance: Moving beyond the ‘iceberg,’ the ‘elephant,’ and the ‘forest’. WIREs: Climate Change, 7(3), 318–28.Google Scholar
Aykut, S. C. and Castro, M. (2017). The end of fossil fuels? Understanding the partial climatisation energy debates. In Aykut, S. C., Foyer, J. and Morena, E., eds., Globalising the Climate: COP21 and the Climatisation of Global Debates, pp. 174–93. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babb, S. (2013). The Washington Consensus as transnational policy paradigm: Its origins, trajectory and likely successor. Review of International Political Economy, 20(2), 268–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacchi, C. L. (2009). Analysing Policy: What‘s the Problem Represented to Be? New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
Baig, T., Mati, A., Coady, D. and Ntamatungiro, J. (2007). Domestic petroleum product prices and subsidies: Recent developments and reform strategies. Washington, DC: IMF Working Papers WP/07/71.Google Scholar
Bailer, S. and Weiler, F. (2015). A political economy of positions in climate change negotiations: Economic, structural, domestic, and strategic explanations. Review of International Organizations, 10(1), 43–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakir, C. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and institutional change: Multilevel governance of central banking reform. Governance, 22(4), 571–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ban, C. (2015). Austerity versus stimulus? Understanding fiscal policy change at the International Monetary Fund since the great recession. Governance, 28(2), 167–83.Google Scholar
Ban, C. and Gallagher, K. (2015). Recalibrating policy orthodoxy: The IMF since the great recession. Governance, 28(2), 131–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbier, E. B. (2010). Global governance: The G20 and a global Green New Deal. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment e-Journal, 4(2010–2). DOI: 10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2010-2.Google Scholar
Barbier, E. B. (2020). Greening the post-pandemic recovery in the G20. Environmental and Resource Economics, 76:685–703. DOI: 10.1007/s10640-020-00437-w.Google Scholar
Barkin, J. S. (2013). International Organization: Theories and Institutions. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, M., Brock, W. and Hansen, L. P. (2020). Pricing uncertainty induced by climate change. Review of Financial Studies, 33(3), 1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, M. and Finnemore, M. (2004). Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bast, E., Doukas, A., Pickard, S., Burg, L. v. d. and Whitley, S. (2015). Empty promises: G20 subsidies to oil, gas and coal production. London: Overseas Development Institute; Oil Change International.Google Scholar
Bauer, M. W. and Ege, J. (2016). Bureaucratic autonomy of international organizations’ secretariats. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), 1019–37.Google Scholar
Beaton, C., Lontoh, L. and Wai-Poi, M. (2017). Indonesia: Pricing reforms, social assistance, and the importance of perceptions. In Inchauste, G. and Victor, D., eds., The Political Economy of Energy Subsidy Reform, pp. 133–207. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Beder, C. and Plougsgaard, H. (2009). Lars Løkke taler til verdens kassemestre. Jyllands-Posten, 7 November.Google Scholar
Benes, K., Cheon, A., Urpelainen, J. and Yang, J. (2015). Low oil prices: An opportunity for fossil fuel subsidy reform. New York: Center on Global Energy Policy.Google Scholar
Bernstein, S. F. (2001). The Compromise of Liberal Environmentalism. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, S. F. and Hoffmann, M. (2019). Climate politics, metaphors and the fractal carbon trap. Nature Climate Change, 9(12), 919–25.Google Scholar
Berr, E. (2017). Post Keynesian economics and sustainable development. In Spash, C., ed. Routledge Handbook of Ecological Economics, Nature and Society, pp. 67–76. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betsill, M., Dubash, N., Paterson, M., van Asselt, H., Vihma, A. and Harald, W. (2015). Building productive links between the UNFCCC and the broader global climate governance landscape. Global Environmental Politics, 15(2), 1–10.Google Scholar
Biermann, F. and Kim, R. (2020). Architectures of Earth System Governance: Institutional Complexity and Structural Transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Biermann, F., Pattberg, P., van Asselt, H. and Zelli, F. (2009a). The fragmentation of global governance architectures: A framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics, 9(4), 14–40.Google Scholar
Biermann, F., Siebenhüner, B., Bauer, S., et al. (2009b). Studying the influence of international bureaucracies: A conceptual framework. In Biermann, F. and Siebenhüner, B., eds., Managers of Global Change, pp. 37–74. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Biermann, R. (2008). Towards a theory of inter-organizational networking. Review of International Organizations, 3(2), 151–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bièvre, D., Espa, I. and Poletti, A. (2017). No iceberg in sight: On the absence of WTO disputes challenging fossil fuel subsidies. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17(3), 411–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Big Shift Global, The. (2019). Letter to World Bank President and Executive Directors calling for more action on climate change. 18 October.Google Scholar
Bina, O. (2013). The green economy and sustainable development: An uneasy balance? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31, 1023–47.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, A. (2016). Norm antipreneurs and theorising resistance to normative change. Review of International Studies, 42(2), 310–33.Google Scholar
Boas, I., Biermann, F. and Kanie, N. (2016). Cross-sectoral strategies in global sustainability governance: Towards a nexus approach. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16(3), 449–64.Google Scholar
Bowen, A., Campiglio, E. and Tavoni, M. (2013). A macroeconomic perspective on climate change mitigation: Meeting the financing challenge. Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy Working Paper No. 142; Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment Working Paper No. 122.Google Scholar
Bowman, M. and Minas, S. (2019). Resilience through interlinkage: The Green Climate Fund and climate finance governance. Climate Policy (Earthscan), 19(3), 342–53.Google Scholar
Bows-Larkin, A. (2015). All adrift: Aviation, shipping, and climate change policy. Climate Policy (Earthscan), 15(6), 681–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bredenkamp, H. and Pattillo, C. (2010). Financing the Response to Climate Change. IMF Staff Position Note SPN10/06. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
Bretton Woods Project. (2019). The IMF and climate change: Can the Fund help countries avoid a ‘climate Minsky moment’? Available at: www.brettonwoodsproject.org/2019/10/the-imf-climate-change-can-the-fund-help-countries-avoid-a-climate-minsky-moment/ (accessed 10 February 2020).Google Scholar
Broome, A. (2015). Back to basics: The Great Recession and the narrowing of IMF policy advice. Governance, 28(2), 147–65.Google Scholar
Broz, J. L. and Hawes, M. B. (2006). US domestic politics and International Monetary Fund policy. In Hawkins, D. G., Lake, D. A., Nielson, D. L. and Tierney, M. J., eds., Delegation and Agency in International Organizations, pp. 77–106. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brunnée, J. and Streck, C. (2013). The UNFCCC as a negotiation forum: Towards common but more differentiated responsibilities. Climate Policy (Earthscan), 13(5), 589–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bureau of Land Management. (2016). Final Rule: Waste Prevention, Production Subject to Royalties, and Resource Conservation. 43 CFR Parts 3100, 3160 and 3170.Google Scholar
Bureau of Land Management. (2018). Final Rule: Waste Prevention, Production Subject to Royalties, and Resource Conservation; Rescission or Revision of Certain Requirements. 43 CFR Parts 3160 and 3170.Google Scholar
Burnham, P. (2001). New Labour and the politics of depoliticisation. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 3(2), 127–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burniaux, J. and Château, J. (2011). Mitigation potential of removing fossil fuel subsidies: A general equilibrium assessment. OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 853. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Busch, P.-O. (2009). The OECD Environment Directorate: The art of persuasion and its limitations. In Biermann, F. and Siebenhüner, B., eds., Managers of Global Change, pp. 75–99. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, B., Wæver, O. and Wilde, J. d. (1998). Security: A New Framework for Analysis, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Byravan, S. (2015). Towards an ambitious and fair deal. The Hindu, 2 December.Google Scholar
Çalışkan, K. and Callon, M. (2009). Economization, part 1: Shifting attention from the economy towards processes of economization. Economy and Society, 38(3), 369–98.Google Scholar
Çalışkan, K. and Callon, M. (2010). Economization, part 2: A research programme for the study of markets. Economy and Society, 39(1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. L. (1998). Institutional analysis and the role of ideas in political economy. Theory and Society, 27(3), 377–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campiglio, E., Dafermos, Y., Monnin, P., Ryan-Collins, J., Schotten, G. and Tanaka, M. (2018). Climate change challenges for central banks and financial regulators. Nature Climate Change, 8(6), 462–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carney, M. (2015). Breaking the tragedy of the horizon: Climate change and financial stability. Speech given at Lloyd’s of London, 29 September.Google Scholar
Carney, M. (2019). Fifty shades of green. Finance and Development, 56(4), 12–15.Google Scholar
Carrington, D. (2015a). UK becomes only G7 country to increase fossil fuel subsidies. The Guardian, 12 November.Google Scholar
Carrington, D. (2015b). UK cuts to renewable energy make a mockery of its pledge at Paris climate talks. The Guardian, 17 December.Google Scholar
Carrington, D. (2019). UK has biggest fossil fuel subsidies in the EU, finds commission. The Guardian, 23 January.Google Scholar
Carrington, D. and Watt, N. (2014). UK pledges £720m to climate change fund for poor countries. The Guardian, 20 November.Google Scholar
Carroll, P. and Kellow, A. (2011). The OECD: A Study of Organisational Adaptation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chami, R., Cosimano, T., Fullenkamp, C. and Oztosun, S. (2019). Nature’s solution to climate change. Finance and Development, 56(4), 34–37.Google Scholar
Chan, S., van Asselt, H., Hale, T., et al. (2015). Reinvigorating international climate policy: A comprehensive framework for effective nonstate action. Global Policy, 6(4), 466–73.Google Scholar
Checkel, J. T. (2005). International institutions and socialization in Europe: Introduction and framework. International Organization, 59(4), 801–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chelminski, K. (2018). Fossil fuel subsidy reform in Indonesia. In Skovgaard, J. and van Asselt, H., eds., The Politics of Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Their Reform, pp. 193–211. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cheon, A., Urpelainen, J. and Lackner, M. (2013). Why do governments subsidize gasoline consumption? An empirical analysis of global gasoline prices, 2002–2009. Energy Policy, 56, 382–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chodor, T. (2017). The G-20 since the global financial crisis: Neither hegemony nor collectivism. Global Governance, 23(2), 205–23.Google Scholar
Chwieroth, J. M. (2008). Normative change from within: The International Monetary Fund’s approach to capital account liberalization. International Studies Quarterly, 52(1), 129–58.Google Scholar
Chwieroth, J. M. (2010). Capital Ideas: The IMF and the Rise of Financial Liberalization, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ciplet, D., Roberts, J. T. and Khan, M. (2013). The politics of international climate adaptation funding: Justice and divisions in the greenhouse. Global Environmental Politics, 13(1), 49–68.Google Scholar
Clapp, J. and Dauvergne, P. (2011). Paths to a Green World: The Political Economy of the Global Environment, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clements, B., Coady, D., Fabrizio, S., Gupta, S., Alleyne, T. and Sdralevich, C. (2013). Energy Subsidy Reform: Lessons and Implications. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
Clements, B., Rodriguez, H. and Schwartz, G. (1998). Economic Determinants of Government Subsidies. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
Clift, B. and Robles, T.-A. (2020). The IMF, tackling inequality, and post-neoliberal ‘reglobalization’: The paradoxes of political legitimation within economistic parameters. Globalizations, 1–16.Google Scholar
Climate Action Network Europe. (2015a). EU finance ministers need to fill the void on climate finance for the Paris Agreement. 5 November.Google Scholar
Climate Action Network Europe. (2015b). Finance ministers’ commitment to support climate action boosts momentum for the Paris agreement. 12 October.Google Scholar
Climate Action Network Europe. (2017). The 2018 European Fossil Fuel Subsidies Award.Google Scholar
Climate Action Peer Exchange. (2020). About us. Available at: www.cape4financeministry.org/about (accessed 23 June 2020).Google Scholar
Coady, D., Parry, I., Le, N.-P. and Shang, B. (2019). Global fossil fuel subsidies remain large: An update based on country-level estimates. IMF Working Paper 19/89. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
Coady, D., Parry, I., Sears, L. and Shang, B. (2015). How Large Are Global Energy Subsidies? Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
Coalition of Finance Ministers for Climate Action, The. (2019). The Coalition of Finance Ministers for Climate Action: An overview.Google Scholar
Coase, R. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3(1), 1–44.Google Scholar
Cole, D. H. (2008). The Stern Review and its critics: Implications for the theory and practice of benefit-cost analysis. Natural Resources Journal, 48(1), 53–90.Google Scholar
Compston, H. and Bailey, I. (2013). Climate policies and anti-climate policies. Open Journal of Political Science, 3(4), 146–57.Google Scholar
Cooper, A. F. (2010). The G20 as an improvised crisis committee and/or a contested ‘steering committee’ for the world. International Affairs, 86(3), 741–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, A. F. and Thakur, R. (2013). The Group of Twenty (G20). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Corfee-Morlot, J., Marchal, V., Kauffmann, C., Kennedy, C., Stewart, F., Kaminker, C. and Ang, G. (2012). Towards a Green Investment Policy Framework. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Costa Rica, Fiji, Iceland, New Zealand and Norway. (2019). Joint Leaders’ Statement on the Launch of the ‘Agreement on Climate Change, Trade and Sustainability’ Initiative. 25 September.Google Scholar
CPI. (2017). Global Landscape of Climate Finance 2017. London: Climate Policy Initiative.Google Scholar
CPI. (2018). Global Climate Finance: An Updated View 2018. London: Climate Policy Initiative.Google Scholar
CPI. (2019). Global Landscape of Climate Finance 2019. London: Climate Policy Initiative.Google Scholar
Crump, L. and Downie, C. (2018). The G20 Chair and the case of the global economic steering committee. Global Society, 32(1), 23–46.Google Scholar
Danish Ministry of Climate Change, Energy and Buildings. (2015). Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 54.Google Scholar
Danish Ministry of Climate Change, Energy and Utilities. (2019). Denmark’s Integrated National Energy and Climate Plan.Google Scholar
Danish Ministry of Energy, Utilities and Climate. (2017). Denmark’s Seventh National Communication on Climate Change Under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol and Denmark’s Third Biennial Report Under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.Google Scholar
Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2017). Danmarks klimafinansiering 2017.Google Scholar
Danish Ministry of Taxation. (2019). Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 34.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, D. (2013). Fossil Fuel Subsidies: Three Questions, Evidence and Way Forward. Delhi: Indian Ministry of Finance.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, D. and Climate Finance Unit. (2015). Climate change finance, analysis of a recent OECD report: Some credible facts needed. Climate Change Finance Unit, Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance, Government of India. Delhi.Google Scholar
Dauvergne, P. (2016). Environmentalism of the Rich. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Davenport, C. (2015). As climate risks rise, talks in Paris set stage for action. New York Times, 30 November.Google Scholar
Dejgaard, H. P. and Hattle, A. (2020). Funding what counts: Assessment of channels for increasing Norwegian climate finance. Oslo: Forum for utveckling og miljø.Google Scholar
Delina, L. (2017). Multilateral development banking in a fragmented climate system: Shifting priorities in energy finance at the Asian Development Bank. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17(1), 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dellink, R., den Elzen, M., Aiking, H., Bergsma, E., Berkhout, F., Dekker, T. and Gupta, J. (2009). Sharing the burden of financing adaptation to climate change. Global Environmental Change – Human and Policy Dimensions, 19(4), 411–21.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J. and Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage revisited: Institutionalized isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–60.Google Scholar
Diop, N. (2014). Why is reducing energy subsidies a prudent, fair, and transformative policy for Indonesia? Economic Premise 136. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Dobbin, F., Simmons, B. and Garrett, G. (2007). The global diffusion of public policies: Social construction, coercion, competition, or learning? Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 449–72.Google Scholar
Dolowitz, D. P. and Marsh, D. (2012). The future of policy transfer research. Political Studies Review, 10(3), 339–45.Google Scholar
Donner, S. D., Kandlikar, M. and Webber, S. (2016). Measuring and tracking the flow of climate change adaptation aid to the developing world. Environmental Research Letters, 11(5), 1–9.Google Scholar
Dostal, J. M. (2004). Campaigning on expertise: How the OECD framed EU welfare and labour market policies – and why success could trigger failure. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(3), 440–60.Google Scholar
Downie, C. (2015). Global energy governance in the G-20: States, coalitions, and crises. Global Governance, 21(3), 475–92.Google Scholar
Dreher, A. and Vaubel, R. (2004). The causes and consequences of IMF conditionality. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 40(3), 26–54.Google Scholar
Drezner, D. W. (2000). Ideas, bureaucratic politics, and the crafting of foreign policy. American Journal of Political Science, 44(4), 733–49.Google Scholar
Drezner, D. W. (2014). The system worked: Global economic governance during the Great Recession. World Politics, 66(1), 123–64.Google Scholar
Dunlop, C. A. and Radaelli, C. M. (2013). Systematising policy learning: From monolith to dimensions. Political Studies, 61(3), 599–619.Google Scholar
Duus-Otterström, G. (2016). Allocating climate adaptation finance: Examining three ethical arguments for recipient control. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16(5), 655.Google Scholar
Easton, D. (1965). A Systems Analysis of Political Life. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Eberlein, B., Abbott, K. W., Black, J., Meidinger, E. and Wood, S. (2014). Transnational business governance interactions: Conceptualization and framework for analysis. Regulation and Governance, 8(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckersley, R. (2004). The Green State: Rethinking Democracy and Sovereignty, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Eckersley, R. (2012). Moving forward in the climate negotiations: Multilateralism or minilateralism? Global Environmental Politics, 12(2), 24–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Editorial. (2015). The Guardian view on the Paris summit: Outlook fair, but storms still possible. The Guardian, 17 September.Google Scholar
Eilperin, J. (2009a). Familiar issues vex climate pact. Washington Post, 19 September.Google Scholar
Eilperin, J. (2009b). New analysis brings dire forecast of 6.3-degree temperature increase. Washington Post, 25 September.Google Scholar
Ekins, P. (2000). Economic Growth and Environmental Sustainability: The Prospects for Green Growth. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Epstein, G. A. (2005). Introduction: Financialization and the world economy. In Epstein, G. A., ed. Financialization and the World Economy, pp. 3–16. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Erickson, P., van Asselt, H., Koplow, D., Lazarus, M., Newell, P., Oreskes, N. and Supran, G. (2020). Why fossil fuel producer subsidies matter. Nature, 578(7793), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esch, A. (2013). Using EU ETS auctioning revenues for climate action. Berlin: Germanwatch.Google Scholar
Felli, R. (2015). Environment, not planning: The neoliberal depoliticisation of environmental policy by means of emissions trading. Environmental Politics, 24(5), 641–60.Google Scholar
Finnemore, M. and Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917.Google Scholar
Fischer, S. (1996). What is reasonable to expect of the IMF on the environment. In Gandhi, V. P., ed. Macroeconomics and the Environment, pp. 247–51. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
Flochel, T. and Gooptu, S. (2016). Guidance for comprehensive energy subsidy reforms: Energy Subsidy Reform Assessment Framework (ESRAF) Good Practice Note. ESMAP Paper. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.Google Scholar
Franz, P. (2005). Outline of the German ‘Case study on subsidy reform experiences’ on energy. Presentation at the Third OECD Workshop on Reforming Environmentally Harmful Subsidies. Paris.Google Scholar
Fridahl, M., Hagemann, M., Röser, F. and Amars, L. (2015). A comparison of design and support priorities of Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions. Journal of Environment and Development, (2), 237.Google Scholar
Friends of Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reform. (2015). Fossil-fuel subsidy reform communiqué.Google Scholar
G8. (2009). Leaders’ Declaration: Responsible leadership for a sustainable future. L’Aquila.Google Scholar
G20. (2009). Progress report on the economic and financial actions of the London, Washington and Pittsburgh G20 summits prepared by the UK Chair of the G20.Google Scholar
G20. (2016a). China’s efforts to phase out and rationalise its inefficient fossil fuel subsidies: A report on the G20 peer review of inefficient fossil-fuel subsidies that encourage wasteful consumption in China.Google Scholar
G20. (2016b). The United States’ efforts to phase out and rationalise its inefficient fossil-fuel subsidies: A report on the G20 peer-review of inefficient fossil-fuel subsidies that encourage wasteful consumption in the United States.Google Scholar
G20. (2017a). Annex to G20 Leaders Declaration: G20 Hamburg Climate and Energy Action Plan for Growth. Hamburg.Google Scholar
G20. (2017b). Germany’s effort to phase out and rationalise its fossil-fuel subsidies: A report on the G20 peer-review of inefficient fossil-fuel subsidies that encourage wasteful consumption in Germany.Google Scholar
G20. (2017c). Mexico’s efforts to phase out and rationalise its fossil-fuel subsidies: A report on the G20 peer-review of inefficient fossil-fuel subsidies that encourage wasteful consumption in Mexico.Google Scholar
G20. (2019a). A collaborative endeavor: Templates for the G20 Karuizawa Innovation Action Plan on Energy Transitions and Global Environment for Sustainable Growth. Submitted by volunteers.Google Scholar
G20. (2019b). Indonesia’s effort to phase out and rationalise its fossil-fuel subsidies: A report on the G20 peer-review of inefficient fossil-fuel subsidies that encourage wasteful consumption in Indonesia.Google Scholar
G20. (2019c). Italy’s effort to phase out and rationalise its fossil-fuel subsidies: A report on the G20 peer-review of inefficient fossil-fuel subsidies that encourage wasteful consumption in Italy.Google Scholar
G20 Energy and Environment Ministers. (2019). Communiqué: G20 Ministerial Meeting on Energy Transitions and Global Environment for Sustainable Growth. Karuizawa.Google Scholar
G20 Energy Ministers. (2015). Communiqué: G20 Energy Ministers Meeting. Brisbane.Google Scholar
G20 Energy Ministers. (2016). G20 Energy Ministerial Meeting Beijing Communiqué. Beijing.Google Scholar
G20 Energy Ministers. (2018). G20 Energy Ministers’ Communiqué. Bariloche.Google Scholar
G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors. (2009). Communiqué: St Andrews Meeting. St Andrews, UK.Google Scholar
G20 Green Finance Study Group. (2016). G20 Green Finance Synthesis Report.Google Scholar
G20 Green Finance Study Group. (2017). G20 Green Finance Synthesis Report 2017.Google Scholar
G20 Heads of State and Government. (2009a). London Summit – Leaders’ Statement. London.Google Scholar
G20 Heads of State and Government. (2009b). Pittsburgh Summit – Leaders’ Statement. Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
G20 Heads of State and Government. (2010a). The G20 Seoul Summit Leaders Declaration. Seoul.Google Scholar
G20 Heads of State and Government. (2010b). The G-20 Toronto Summit Declaration. Toronto.Google Scholar
G20 Heads of State and Government. (2011). Communiqué: G20 Leaders’ Summit. Cannes.Google Scholar
G20 Heads of State and Government. (2012). G20 Leaders’ Declaration. Los Cabos.Google Scholar
G20 Heads of State and Government. (2013). G20 Leaders’ Declaration. Saint Petersburg.Google Scholar
G20 Heads of State and Government. (2014). G20 Leaders’ Communiqué – Brisbane Summit. Brisbane.Google Scholar
G20 Heads of State and Government. (2015). G20 Leaders’ Communiqué – Antalya Summit. Antalya.Google Scholar
G20 Heads of State and Government. (2016). G20 Leaders’ Communiqué: Hangzhou Summit. Hangzhou.Google Scholar
G20 Heads of State and Government. (2017). G20 Leaders´ Declaration. Hamburg.Google Scholar
G20 Heads of State and Government. (2018). G20 Leaders´ Declaration. Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
G20 Heads of State and Government. (2019). G20 Osaka Leaders’ Declaration. Osaka.Google Scholar
G20 Climate Finance Study Group. (2012). Progress Report.Google Scholar
G20 Climate Finance Study Group. (2013). Progress report to G20 Leaders.Google Scholar
G20 Climate Finance Study Group. (2014). Report to the Finance Ministers.Google Scholar
G20 Climate Finance Study Group. (2015). Report to the Finance Ministers.Google Scholar
G20 Climate Finance Study Group. (2016a). Promoting efficient and transparent provision and mobilization of climate finance to enhance ambition of mitigation and adaptation actions. Toolkit prepared by invited IOs.Google Scholar
G20 Climate Finance Study Group. (2016b). Promoting efficient and transparent provision and mobilization of climate finance to enhance ambition of mitigation and adaptation actions. Toolkit prepared by invited IOs.Google Scholar
G20 Sustainable Finance Study Group. (2018). G20 Sustainable Finance Synthesis Report.Google Scholar
Galbraith, K. (2009). Inhofe pans Obama climate speech. New York Times, 22 September.Google Scholar
Gandhi, V. P. (1998). The IMF and the Environment. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
Gandhi, V. P. and McMorran, R. T. (1996). How macroeconomic policies affect the environment: What do we know? In Gandhi, V. P., ed. Macroeconomics and the Environment, pp. 29–43. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
Garg, V., Balasubramanian, V., Danwant, N., et al. (2020). Mapping India’s Energy Subsidies 2020: Fossil Fuels, Renewables, and Electric Vehicles. Geneva: IISD.Google Scholar
Gehring, T. and Faude, B. (2014). A theory of emerging order within institutional complexes: How competition among regulatory international institutions leads to institutional adaptation and division of labor. Review of International Organizations, 9(4), 471–98.Google Scholar
Gehring, T. and Oberthur, S. (2009). The causal mechanisms of interaction between international institutions. European Journal of International Relations, 15(1), 125–56.Google Scholar
Gençsü, I., McLynn, M., Runkel, M., et al. (2017). Phase-Out 2020: Monitoring Europe’s Fossil Fuel Subsidies. London: Overseas Development Institute and Climate Action Network Europe.Google Scholar
Georgieva, K. (2019). The adaptive age. Finance and Development, 56(4), 20–21.Google Scholar
Gerasimchuk, I. (2014). A crash course on subsidy definition by Dante, Shakespeare and Russian folklore. Available at: www.iisd.org/gsi/news/crash-course-subsidy-definition-dante-shakespeare-and-russian-folklore (accessed 9 September 2015).Google Scholar
Getzner, M., Spash, C. L. and Stagl, S. (2004). Alternatives for Environmental Valuation. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Team, GLI. (2018). Spain’s relationship status with the G20: It’s complicated. Available at: www.globalpolicyjournal.com/blog/30/11/2018/spains-relationship-status-g20-its-complicated (accessed 22 June 2020).Google Scholar
Gomez-Echeverri, L. (2013). The changing geopolitics of climate change finance. Climate Policy, 13(5), 632–48.Google Scholar
Government of Indonesia. (2002). Letter of Intent to the IMF.Google Scholar
Government of Indonesia. (2019). Indonesia’s effort to phase out and rationalise its fossil-fuel subsidies: A self report on the G-20 peer review of inefficient fossil fuel subsidies that encourage wasteful consumption in Indonesia.Google Scholar
Graham, E. R. and Serdaru, A. (2020). Power, control, and the logic of substitution in institutional design: The case of international climate finance. International Organization, 74(4), 671–706.Google Scholar
Grasso, M. (2007). A normative ethical framework in climate change. Climatic Change, 81(3), 223–46.Google Scholar
Grippa, P., Schmittmann, J. and Suntheim, F. (2019). Climate change and financial risk. Finance and Development, 56(4), 26–29.Google Scholar
Grubb, M., Hourcade, J.-C. and Neuhoff, K. (2014). Planetary Economics: Energy, Climate Change and the Three Domains of Sustainable Development, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gupta, S., Harnisch, J., Barua, D. C., et al. (2014). Cross-cutting investment and finance issues. In Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sokona, Y., E., eds., Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gupta, S., Verhoeven, M., Gillingham, R., Schiller, C., Mansoor, A. and Cordoba, J. P. (2000). Equity and Efficiency in the Reform of Price Subsidies: A Guide for Policymakers. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
Gurría, A. (2019). Remarks to the G7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors Meeting: Working breakfast: Climate and green finance. 18 July.Google Scholar
Gutner, T. and Thompson, A. (2010). The politics of IO performance: A framework. Review of International Organizations, 5(3), 227.Google Scholar
Haas, P. M. (1992). Epistemic communities and international policy coordination: Introduction. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35.Google Scholar
Haas, P. M. (2000). International institutions and social learning in the management of global environmental risks. Policy Studies Journal, 28(3), 558–75.Google Scholar
Haites, E., ed., (2013). International Climate Finance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hajnal, P. I. (2015). G7/8 and G20 accountability and civil society. In Larionova, M. and Kirton, J. J., eds., The G8-G20 Relationship in Global Governance. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Hajnal, P. I. (2019). The G20: Evolution, Interrelationships, Documentation. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Halimanjaya, A. (2015). Climate mitigation finance across developing countries: What are the major determinants? Climate Policy, 15(2), 223–52.Google Scholar
Halimanjaya, A. (2016). Allocating climate mitigation finance: A comparative analysis of five major green donors. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 6(3), 161–85.Google Scholar
Hall, N. (2016). Displacement, Development, and Climate Change: International Organizations Moving Beyond Their Mandates. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hall, P. A. and Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936–57.Google Scholar
Hannestad, A. and Bostrup, J. (2019). Klimabistand tages fra de fattigste. Politiken, 13 November.Google Scholar
Hansen, G. (2017). Germany fails at G20 Fossil Fuel Subsidy Review. Germanwatch. Available at: https://germanwatch.org/en/14750 (accessed 23 June 2020).Google Scholar
Hansen, G., Eckstein, D., Weischer, L. and Bals, C. (2017). Shifting the Trillions: The Role of the G20 in Making Financial Flows Consistent with Global Long-Term Climate Goals. Bonn: GermanWatch.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haščič, I., Rodríguez, M. C., Jachnik, R., Silva, J. and Johnstone, N. (2015). Public Interventions and Private Climate Finance Flows. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Hawkins, D. G., Lake, D. A. and Nielson, D. L. (2006). Delegation and Agency in International Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hay, C. (2007). Why We Hate Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Held, D. and Young, K. (2013). Global governance in crisis? Fragmentation, risk and world order. International Politics, 50(3), 309–32.Google Scholar
Hermwille, L. and Sanderink, L. (2019). Make fossil fuels great again? The Paris Agreement, Trump, and the US fossil fuel industry. Global Environmental Politics, 19(4), 45–62.Google Scholar
Hibben, M. (2015). Coalitions of change: Explaining IMF low-income country reform in the post-Washington Consensus. Journal of International Relations and Development, 18(2), 202–26.Google Scholar
Hibben, M. (2016). Poor States, Power and the Politics of IMF Reform: Drivers of Change in the Post-Washington Consensus. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
High-Level Commission on Carbon Prices. (2017). Report of the High-Level Commission on Carbon Prices. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
HM Treasury. (2017a). Answer to House of Commons Question 63181.Google Scholar
HM Treasury. (2017b). Answer to House of Commons Question 63284.Google Scholar
HM Treasury. (2019). Response to the petition to convert fossil fuel subsidies into subsidies for renewable energy.Google Scholar
Hodas, D. R. (2006). Ecosystem subsidies of fossil fuels. Journal of Land Use and Environmental Law, 22(2), 599–622.Google Scholar
Hoffman, A. J. and Ventresca, M. J. (1999). The institutional framing of policy debates: Economics versus the environment. American Behavioural Scientist, 42(8), 1368–92.Google Scholar
Hong, H., Karolyi, G. A. and Scheinkman, J. A. (2020). Climate finance. Review of Financial Studies, 33(3), 1011–23.Google Scholar
Hong, H., Li, F. W. and Xu, J. (2019). Climate risks and market efficiency. Journal of Econometrics, 208(1), 265–81.Google Scholar
House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee. (2013). Energy Subsidies. London.Google Scholar
House of Lords European Union Committee. (2019). Letter regarding EM 5163/19: Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Energy prices and costs in Europe. 12 June.Google Scholar
Howard, P. H. and Sterner, T. (2017). Few and not so far between: A meta-analysis of climate damage estimates. Environmental and Resource Economics, 68(1), 197–225.Google Scholar
Howarth, D. and Sadeh, T. (2011). In the vanguard of globalization: The OECD and international capital liberalization. Review of International Political Economy, 18(5), 622–45.Google Scholar
Hurd, I. (2005). The strategic use of liberal internationalism: Libya and the UN Sanctions, 1992–2003. International Organization, 59(3), 495–526.Google Scholar
Hurrell, A. (2007). Governing the Globe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
ICAO. (2019). Climate Change Mitigation: CORSIA.Google Scholar
IEA. (2000). World Energy Outlook 1999. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
IEA. (2014). World Energy Outlook 2014. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
IEA. (2015). World Energy Outlook 2015. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
IEA. (2016). World Energy Outlook 2016. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
IEA. (2017). World Energy Outlook 2017. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
IEA. (2018). World Energy Outlook 2018. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
IEA. (2019). World Energy Outlook 2019. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
IEA and OECD. (2018). Update on Recent Progress in Reform of Inefficient Fossil Fuel Subsidies that Encourage Wasteful Consumption. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
IEA, OECD and World Bank. (2010). The Scope of Fossil-Fuel Subsidies in 2009 and a Roadmap for Phasing out Fossil-Fuel Subsidies. Prepared for the G-20 Summit, Seoul (Republic of Korea), 11–12 November.Google Scholar
IEA, OPEC, OECD and World Bank. (2010). Analysis of the scope of energy subsidies and suggestions for the G-20 Initiative. Joint Report prepared for submission to the G-20 Summit Meeting Toronto (Canada), 26–27 June 2010.Google Scholar
IEA, OPEC, OECD and World Bank. (2011). Joint report by IEA, OPEC, OECD and World Bank on fossil-fuel and other energy subsidies: An update of the G20 Pittsburgh and Toronto Commitments. Joint report prepared for the G20 Meeting of Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors (Paris, 14–15 October 2011) and the G20 Summit (Cannes, 3–4 November 2011).Google Scholar
IISD. (2014). India energy subsidy review. Geneva: IISD.Google Scholar
IISD. (2015a). G20 finance ministers discuss sustainable development, climate change. 5 September.Google Scholar
IISD. (2015b). Indonesia energy subsidy briefing. Geneva: IISD.Google Scholar
IISD. (2018). Indonesia energy subsidy news briefing. Geneva: IISD.Google Scholar
IMF. (2008a). Food and Fuel Prices: Recent Developments, Macroeconomic Impact, and Policy Responses. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
IMF. (2008b). Fuel and Food Price Subsidies: Issues and Reform Options. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
IMF. (2008c). Reform of Quota and Voice in the International Monetary Fund: Report of the Executive Board to the Board of Governors. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
IMF. (2011a). Market-Based Instruments for International Aviation and Shipping as a Source of Climate Finance. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
IMF. (2011b). Promising Domestic Fiscal Instruments for Climate Finance. Washington,DC: IMF.Google Scholar
IMF. (2015a). Burkina Faso. Second and third reviews under the Extended Credit Facility Arrangement.Google Scholar
IMF. (2015b). Staff Report on Guidance Note for Surveillance under Article IV Consultation. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
IMF. (2015c). Ukraine: – Second and third reviews under the Extended Credit Facility Arrangement Request for Extended Arrangement under the Extended Fund Facility and Cancellation of Stand-By Arrangement.Google Scholar
IMF. (2016a). Enhancing Resilience to Natural Disasters in Sub-Saharan Africa. Regional Economic Outlook, October 2016, Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
IMF. (2016b). Small States’ Resilience to Natural Disasters and Climate Change: Role for the IMF. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
IMF. (2017a). Belize: Climate change policy assessment. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
IMF. (2017b). Factsheet: IMF quotas. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
IMF. (2017c). Seychelles: Climate change policy assessment. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
IMF. (2018a). IMF country-level subsidy estimates database, 2018.Google Scholar
IMF. (2018b). St Lucia: Climate change policy assessment. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
IMF. (2019a). The economics of climate. Finance and Development, 56(4), 1–68.Google Scholar
IMF. (2019b). Federation of Micronesia: Climate change policy assessment. Washington DC: IMF.Google Scholar
IMF. (2019c). Fiscal Policies for Paris Climate Strategies: From Principles to Practice. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
IMF. (2019d). Grenada: Climate change policy assessment. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
IMF. (2019e). How to Mitigate Climate Change. Washington, DC: IMF. Fiscal Monitor.Google Scholar
IMF. (2019f). IMF Executive Board reviews fiscal policies for Paris climate strategies. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
IMF. (2019g). IMF Executive Board reviews implementation of IMF commitments in support of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
IMF. (2019h). Review of implementation of IMF commitments in support of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Staff Note. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
IMF. (2019i). Third review under Argentina’s Stand-By Arrangement.Google Scholar
IMF. (2020a). Gender and IMF. Available at: www.imf.org/external/themes/gender/ (accessed 23 June 2020).Google Scholar
IMF. (2020b). The IMF at a glance. Available at: www.imf.org/en/About/Factsheets/IMF-at-a-Glance (accessed 22 June 2020).Google Scholar
IMF. (2020c). IMF members’ quotas and voting power, and IMF Board of Governors. Available at: www.imf.org/external/np/sec/memdir/members.aspx (accessed 22 June 2020).Google Scholar
IMF Survey. (2001). IMF team keeps an eye on linkages between environment and macroeconomic policies. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
Inchauste, G. and Victor, D. G. (2017). The Political Economy of Energy Subsidy Reform, Washington, DC: World Bank Group.Google Scholar
Indian Ministry of Finance. (2018). 3 Essential “S”s of climate finance: Scope, scale and speed: A reflection.Google Scholar
Indian Ministry of Finance. (2019). Climate summit for enhanced action: A financial perspective from India.Google Scholar
Indonesian Ministry of Finance. (2009). Ministry of Finance Green Paper: Economic and fiscal policy strategies for climate change mitigation in Indonesia. Jakarta: Ministry of Finance; Australia Indonesia Partnership.Google Scholar
Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change. (2020). About us. Available at: www.iigcc.org/about-us/ (accessed 23 June 2020).Google Scholar
Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon. (2013). Technical update of the social cost of carbon for regulatory impact analysis. US Government.Google Scholar
Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon. (2016). Technical update of the social cost of carbon for regulatory impact analysis under Executive Order 12866. US Government.Google Scholar
Jachnik, R., Mirabile, M. and Dobrinevski, A. (2019). Tracking finance flows towards assessing their consistency with climate objectives: Proposed scope, knowns and unknowns. Environment Working Paper 146. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Jacobs, M. (1997). Sustainability and markets: On the neoclassical model of environmental economics. New Political Economy, 2(3), 365–85.Google Scholar
Jacobs, M. (2012). Green growth: Economic theory and political discourse. Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy Working Paper. London.Google Scholar
Jain, A., Agrawal, S. and Ganesan, K. (2018). Lessons from the world’s largest subsidy benefit transfer scheme. In Skovgaard, J. and van Asselt, H., eds., The Politics of Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Their Reform, pp. 212–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jakob, M. and Hilaire, J. (2015). Using importers’ windfall savings from oil subsidy reform to enhance international cooperation on climate policies. Climatic Change, 131(4), 465–72.Google Scholar
Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Nohrstedt, D., Weible, C. M. and Sabatier, P. A. (2014). Advocacy Coalition Framework: Foundations, evolution, and ongoing research. In Sabatier, P. A. and Weible, C. M., eds., Theories of the Policy Process, pp. 183–223. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Jessop, B. (2012). Understanding the “economization” of social formations. In Schimank, U. and Volkmann, U., eds., The Marketization of Society: Economizing the Non-Economic, pp. 5–36. Bremen: Forschungsverbund “Welfare Societies”.Google Scholar
Jewell, J., McCollum, D., Emmerling, J., et al. (2018). Limited emission reductions from fuel subsidy removal except in energy-exporting regions. Nature, 554(7691), 229–33.Google Scholar
Jinnah, S. (2015). Post-Treaty Politics: Secretariat Influence in Global Environmental Governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jinnah, S. (2017). Makers, takers, shakers, shapers: Emerging economies and normative engagement in climate governance. Global Governance, 23(2), 285–306.Google Scholar
Johnston, A. I. (2001). Treating international institutions as social environments. International Studies Quarterly, 45(4), 487–515.Google Scholar
Jones, D. and Steenblik, R. P. (2010). Subsidy estimation: A survey of current practice. Geneva: IISD.Google Scholar
Jordan, A. and Huitema, D. (2014). Innovations in climate policy: The politics of invention, diffusion, and evaluation. Environmental Politics, 23(5), 715–34.Google Scholar
Jordan, A., Huitema, D., van Asselt, H. and Forster, J., eds. (2018). Governing Climate Change: Polycentricity in Action? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jordan, A. and Lenschow, A. (2010). Environmental policy integration: A state of the art review. Environmental Policy and Governance, 20(3), 147–58.Google Scholar
Joyce, J. P. (2013). The IMF and Global Financial Crises: Phoenix Rising? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaarbo, J. (1998). Power politics in foreign policy: The influence of bureaucratic minorities. European Journal of International Relations, 4(1), 67–97.Google Scholar
Kahler, M. (2000). Conclusion: The causes and consequences of legalization. International Organization, 54(3), 661–83.Google Scholar
Kahn, M. E., Mohaddes, K., Ng, R. N. C., Pesaran, M. H., Raissi, M. M. and Yang, J.-C. (2019). Long-term macroeconomic effects of climate change: A cross-country analysis. IMF Working Papers 215. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
Kaminker, C., Kawanishi, O., Stewart, F., Caldecott, B. and Howarth, N. (2013). Institutional investors and green infrastructure investments: Selected case studies. OECD Working Papers on Finance, Insurance and Private Pensions. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Kanbur, R. (2001). Economic policy, distribution and poverty: The nature of disagreements. World Development, 29(6), 1083–94.Google Scholar
Kato, T., Ellis, J. and Clapp, C. (2014a). The role of the 2015 Agreement in mobilising climate finance. Climate Change Expert Group Paper No. 2014(7). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Kato, T., Ellis, J., Pauw, P. and Caruso, R. (2014b). Scaling up and replicating effective climate finance interventions. Climate Change Expert Group Paper No. 2014(1). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Katz-Rosene, R. and Paterson, M. (2018). Thinking Ecologically about the Global Political Economy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kaya, A. and Reay, M. (2019). How did the Washington Consensus move within the IMF? Fragmented change from the 1980s to the aftermath of the 2008 crisis. Review of International Political Economy, 26(3), 384–409.Google Scholar
Kentikelenis, A. E., Stubbs, T. H. and King, L. P. (2016). IMF conditionality and development policy space, 1985–2014. Review of International Political Economy, 23(4), 543–82.Google Scholar
Keohane, R. O. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, R. O. (1989). International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory. Boulder, CO.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, R. O. and Levy, M. A. eds., (1996). Institutions for Environmental Aid: Pitfalls and Promise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, R. O. and Victor, D. G. (2011). The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics, 9(1), 7–23.Google Scholar
Keohane, R. O. and Victor, D. G. (2016). Cooperation and discord in global climate policy. Nature Climate Change, 6, 570–5.Google Scholar
Kim, J. and Chung, S.-Y. (2012). The role of the G20 in governing the climate change regime. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 12(4), 361–74.Google Scholar
Kim, S. and Urpelainen, J. (2013). International energy lending: Who funds fossil fuels, who funds energy access for the poor? International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 13(4), 411–23.Google Scholar
Kingdon, J. W. (2003). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 2nd ed. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Kirton, J. J. and Kokotsis, E. (2015). The Global Governance of Climate Change: G7, G20, and UN Leadership, Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kirton, J. J., Larionova, M., Bracht, C., et al. (2013). Mapping G20 decisions implementation. Toronto: The International Organizations Research Institute of the National Research, University Higher School of Economics, The G20 Research Group of the University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Klein, N. (2019). On Fire: The Burning Case for a Green New Deal, London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Knaggård, Å. , Hildingsson, R. and Skovgaard, J. (2016). The interaction of domestic and international factors in understanding policy change. In The European Consortium for Political Research General Conference. Prague.Google Scholar
Knill, C. and Bauer, M. W. (2016). Policy-making by international public administrations: concepts, causes and consequences. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), 949–59.Google Scholar
Kojima, M. (2016). Fossil Fuel Subsidy and Pricing Policies: Recent Developing Country Experience. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Kojima, M. and Koplow, D. (2015). Fossil Fuel Subsidies: Approaches and Valuation. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Kongstad, J., From, L. and Beder, C. (2009). Klimaregning i milliardklassen. Jyllands-Posten, 30 October.Google Scholar
Koplow, D. (2009). Measuring energy subsidies using the price-gap approach: What does it leave out? Geneva: IISD.Google Scholar
Koplow, D. (2018). Defining and measuring fossil fuel subsidies. In Skovgaard, J. and van Asselt, H., eds., The Politics of Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Their Reform, pp. 23–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kranke, M. (2020). IMF‐World Bank cooperation before and after the global financial crisis. Global Policy, 11(1), 15–25.Google Scholar
Krasner, S. D. (1983). International Regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, F. V. (1989). Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krogstrup, S. and Oman, W. (2019). Macroeconomic and Financial Policies for Climate Change Mitigation: A Review of the Literature. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
Krueger, P., Sautner, Z. and Starks, L. T. (2020). The importance of climate risks for institutional investors. Review of Financial Studies, 33(3), 1067.Google Scholar
Lagarde, C. (2015). The Managing Director’s statement on the role of the Fund in addressing climate change.Google Scholar
Lagarde, C. and Gaspar, V. (2019). Getting real on meeting Paris climate change commitments. IMFBlog (accessed 2 January 2020).Google Scholar
Lang, K. (2011). The first year of the G-20 commitment on fossil-fuel subsidies: A commentary on lessons learned and the path forward. Geneva: IISD.Google Scholar
Larsen, B. and Shah, A. (1992). World fossil fuel subsidies and global carbon emissions. Policy Research Working Papers no. WPS 1002. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Lauber, V. and Schenner, E. (2011). The struggle over support schemes for renewable electricity in the European Union: A discursive-institutionalist analysis. Environmental Politics, 20(4), 508–27.Google Scholar
Lazarowicz, M. (2009). Global carbon trading: A framework for reducing emissions. London: UK Government.Google Scholar
Le Prestre, P. (1989). The World Bank and the Environmental Challenge. Selinsgrove, PA: Susquehanna University Press.Google Scholar
Least Developed Countries’ Group. (2014). Submission by Nepal on behalf of the Least Developed Countries Group on the ADP Co-Chairs’ Non Paper of 7 July 2014 on parties views and proposal on the elements for a draft negotiating text.Google Scholar
Lederer, M. (2012). Market making via regulation: The role of the state in carbon markets. Regulation and Governance, 6(4), 524–44.Google Scholar
Lehtonen, M. (2007). Environmental policy integration through OECD peer reviews: Integrating the economy with the environment or the environment with the economy? Environmental Politics, 16(1), 15–35.Google Scholar
Lehtonen, M. (2009). OECD organisational discourse, peer reviews and sustainable development: An ecological-institutionalist perspective. Ecological Economics, 69(2), 389–97.Google Scholar
Lemphers, N., Bernstein, S. F. and Hoffmann, M. (2018). The Global Subsidies Initiative. In Skovgaard, J. and van Asselt, H., eds., The Politics of Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Their Reform, pp. 173–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lesage, D. (2015). The G7/8 and G20: Parallel paths to pragmatic partnership. In Larionova, M. and Kirton, J. J., eds., The G8–G20 Relationship in Global Governance. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Lesage, D. and Van de Graaf, T. (2013). Thriving in complexity: The OECD system’s role in energy and taxation. Global Governance, 19(1), 83–92.Google Scholar
Lew, J. J. (2014). Remarks of Secretary Jacob J. Lew on the Economics of Climate Change. Hosted by the Hamilton Project At the Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Lindenthal, A. and Koch, M. (2013). The Bretton Woods Institutions and the environment: organizational learning within the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Administrative Sciences, 3(4), 166–201.Google Scholar
Lockwood, M. (2015). Fossil fuel subsidy reform, rent management and political fragmentation in developing countries. New Political Economy, 20(4), 475–94.Google Scholar
MacNeil, R. (2016). Death and environmental taxes: Why market environmentalism fails in liberal market economies. Global Environmental Politics, 16(1), 21–37.Google Scholar
Madra, Y. M. and Adaman, F. (2014). Neoliberal Reason and Its Forms: De-Politicisation Through Economisation. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Marcussen, M. (2009). Scientization of central banking: The politics of A-politicization. In Dyson, K. and Marcussen, M., eds., Central Banks in the Age of Euro: Europeanization, Convergence and Power, pp. 373–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marsh, D. and Sharman, J. C. (2009). Policy diffusion and policy transfer. Policy Studies, 30(3), 269–88.Google Scholar
Martin, L. L. and Simmons, B. A. (2012). International organizations and institutions. In: Carlsnaes, W., Risse, T. and Simmons, B. A., eds., Handbook of International Relations. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Massey, A., ed. (1997). Globalization and Marketization of Government Services: Comparing Contemporary Public Sector Development. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mathiesen, K. (2015). UK’s £6bn climate finance pledge is welcome – but not its fair share. The Guardian, 28 September.Google Scholar
Mavelli, L. (2018). Citizenship for sale and the neoliberal political economy of belonging. International Studies Quarterly, 62(3), 482–93.Google Scholar
McCormack, F. (2017). Private Oceans: The Enclosure and Marketisation of the Seas. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
McCulloch, N. (2017). Energy Subsidies, International Aid, and the Politics of Reform. Helsinki: United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research.Google Scholar
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Club of Rome, Randers, J. and BehrensIII, W. W. (1972). The limits to growth: A report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. Tunbridge Wells: Earth Island.Google Scholar
Meckling, J. and Allan, B. B. (2020). The evolution of ideas in global climate policy. Nature Climate Change, 10(5), 434–38.Google Scholar
Michael, M. (2013). Protests and violence increase in Sudan. Washington Post, 28 September.Google Scholar
Michaelowa, A. and Michaelowa, K. (2011a). Coding error or statistical embellishment? The political economy of reporting climate aid. World Development, 39(11), 2010–20.Google Scholar
Michaelowa, A. and Michaelowa, K. (2011b). Old wine in new bottles? Does climate policy determine bilateral development aid for renewable energy and energy efficiency? International Development Policy, 2, 60–86.Google Scholar
Mintrom, M. and Norman, P. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 37(4), 649–67.Google Scholar
Moerenhout, T. S. H. (2018). Reforming Egypt’s fossil fuel subsidies in the context of a changing social contract. In Skovgaard, J. and van Asselt, H., eds., The Politics of Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Their Reform, pp. 265–82. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mohan, V. (2015a). Climate negotiators end Bonn mission with expanded draft text, issue of finance remains unresolved. Times of India, 24 October.Google Scholar
Mohan, V. (2015b). Creating right climate for Paris: Heads of state may not be part of concluding round of talks. Times of India, 31 July.Google Scholar
Mohan, V. (2015c). G20 summit in Turkey in November may hold key to Paris climate talks outcome. Times of India, 28 July.Google Scholar
Mol, A. P. J. and Spaargaren, G. (2000). Ecological modernisation theory in debate: A review. Environmental Politics, 9(1), 17–49.Google Scholar
Momani, B. (2007). IMF staff: Missing link in fund reform proposals. Review of International Organizations, 2(1), 39–57.Google Scholar
Momani, B. and Hibben, M. (2015). Cooperation or clashes on 19th Street? Theorizing and assessing IMF and World Bank collaboration. Journal of International Organizational Studies, 6(2), 27–43.Google Scholar
Momani, B. and Hibben, M. (2018). What’s Wrong with the IMF and How to Fix It, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mooij, R. d. and Keen, M. (2012). Fiscal instruments for climate finance. In Mooij, R. d. and Keen, M., eds., Fiscal Policy to Mitigate Climate Change, pp. 133–50. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
Mooij, R. d., Keen, M. and Parry, I. (2012). Fiscal Policy to Mitigate Climate Change: A Guide for Policymakers. Washington, DC: IMF Press.Google Scholar
Mooney, C. (2015). Pope’s speech at the U.N. could have impact on climate debate. Washington Post, 22 September.Google Scholar
Moore, F. C. (2012). Negotiating adaptation: Norm selection and hybridization in international climate negotiations. Global Environmental Politics, (4), 30–48.Google Scholar
Moschella, M. (2015). The institutional roots of incremental ideational change: The IMF and capital controls after the global financial crisis. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 17(3), 442–60.Google Scholar
Mukherji, R. (2013). Ideas, interests, and the tipping point: Economic change in India. Review of International Political Economy, 20(2), 363–89.Google Scholar
Mulder, P. and Van Den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2001). Evolutionary economic theories of Sustainable Development. Growth and Change, 32(1), 110.Google Scholar
Nandi, J. (2017). Health cost of air pollution 8 times spent on fuel subsidies in India: Report. Times of India, 29 July.Google Scholar
Nasution, A. (2013). Economic impact of energy subsidies. Kompass, 16 April.Google Scholar
Neslen, A. (2015). 150 countries pledge to curb carbon emissions. The Guardian, 15 October.Google Scholar
Newell, P. (2012). Globalization and the Environment: Capitalism, Ecology and Power, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Newell, P. (2019). Global Green Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Newell, P. and Johnstone, P. (2018). The political economy of incumbency: Fossil fuel subsidies in global and historical context. In Skovgaard, J. and van Asselt, H., eds., The Politics of Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Their Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Newell, P. and Paterson, M. (2010). Climate Capitalism: Global Warming and the Transformation of the Global Economy: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nielsen, J. and Andersen, E. Ø. (2015). Danmark vil fjerne statsstøtte til olie, bare ikke i Danmark. Politiken, 13 February.Google Scholar
Nielson, D. L. and Tierney, M. I. (2003). Delegation to international organizations: Agency theory and World Bank environmental reform. International Organization, 57(2), 241–76.Google Scholar
Niemann, D. and Martens, K. (2018). Soft governance by hard fact? The OECD as a knowledge broker in education policy. Global Social Policy, 18(3), 267–83.Google Scholar
Nilsson, M. and Pallemaerts, M., eds. (2009). Special Issue: International Regimes and Environmental Policy Integration. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 9(4).Google Scholar
Nilsson, M., Zamparutti, T., Petersen, J. E., Nykvist, B., Rudberg, P. and McGuinn, J. (2012). Understanding policy coherence: Analytical framework and examples of sector-environment policy interactions in the EU. Environmental Policy and Governance, 22(6), 395–423.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, W. D. (2007). A review of the Stern Review on the economics of climate change. Journal of Economic Literature, 45(3), 686–702.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, W. D. (2008). A Question of Balance: Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies, London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, W. D. (2019). Climate change: The ultimate challenge for economics. American Economic Review, 109(6), 1991–2014.Google Scholar
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oberthür, S. and Stokke, O. S., eds. (2011). Managing Institutional Complexity: Regime Interplay and Global Environmental Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
OECD. (1974). Recommendation of the Council on the implementation of the polluter-pays principle. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD. (1996). OECD Environmental Performance Reviews – United States. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD. (1999). Action Against Climate Change: The Kyoto Protocol and Beyond. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD. (2002). OECD workshop on environmentally harmful subsidies: Draft agenda. Paris.Google Scholar
OECD. (2003). Second workshop: OECD technical expert meeting on environmental harmful subsidies: Draft agenda. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD. (2005a). OECD Environmental Performance Reviews – United States. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD. (2005b). Third workshop on reforming environmentally harmful subsidies: Draft agenda. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD. (2009). The Economics of Climate Change Mitigation: Policies and Options for Global Action Beyond 2012. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD. (2011a). Inventory of Estimated Budgetary Support and Tax Expenditures for Fossil Fuels. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD. (2011b). Towards Green Growth. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD. (2012a). Development Co-operation Report 2012: Lessons in Linking Sustainability and Development. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD. (2012b). Inventory of Estimated Budgetary Support and Tax Expenditures for Fossil Fuels 2013. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD. (2014). Update on the OECD’s work on climate finance and investment. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD. (2015a). Climate finance in 2013–14 and the USD 100 billion goal. Paris: OECD in collaboration with Climate Policy Initiative (CPI).Google Scholar
OECD. (2015b). OECD Companion to the Inventory of Support Measures for Fossil Fuels 2015. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD. (2016). 2020 Projections of climate finance towards the USD 100 billion goal: Technical Note. Paris: OECD PublishingGoogle Scholar
OECD. (2017). Private Finance for Climate Action: Estimating the Effects of Public Interventions. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD. (2018a). Converged statistical reporting directives for the creditor reporting system (CRS) and the annual DAC Questionnaire. Paris: DAC Working Party on Development Finance Statistics.Google Scholar
OECD. (2018b). OECD Companion to the Inventory of Support Measures for Fossil Fuels 2018. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD. (2018c). OECD forum on green finance and investment: Agenda. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD. (2019a). About the Centre on Green Finance and Investment. Available at: www.oecd.org/cgfi/about/ (accessed 3 June 2020).Google Scholar
OECD. (2019b). Climate Finance Provided and Mobilised by Developed Countries in 2013–17. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD. (2019c). Fossil fuel support country note: Denmark. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD. (2019d). Fossil fuel support country note: India. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD. (2019e). Fossil fuel support country note: Indonesia. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD. (2019f). Fossil fuel support country note: The United Kingdom. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD. (2019g). Fossil fuel support country note: The United States of America. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD. (2019h). OECD environmental performance reviews: Denmark. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD. (2020a). OECD inventory of support measures for fossil fuels. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD. (2020b). OECD Secretary-General’s report to ministers 2020. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD. (2020c). Research and analytical partners. Available at: www.oecd.org/env/researchcollaborative/partners/ (accessed 23 June 2020).Google Scholar
OECD and IEA. (2019). Update on recent progress in reform of inefficient fossil-fuel subsidies that encourage wasteful consumption.Google Scholar
OECD and IEA. (2020). OECD-IEA fossil fuel support and other analysis. Available at: www.oecd.org/fossil-fuels/ (accessed 23 June 2020).Google Scholar
OECD and International Labour Organization. (2015). Monitoring progress in reducing the gender gap in labour force participation. Report prepared for the meeting of the G20 Employment Working Group Istanbul, Turkey, 7–8 May 2015.Google Scholar
OECD, International Labour Organization, IMF and World Bank. (2014). Achieving stronger growth by promoting a more gender-balanced economy. Report prepared for the G20 Labour and Employment Ministerial Meeting Melbourne, Australia, 10–11 September 2014.Google Scholar
OECD and World Bank. (2016). Climate and disaster resilience financing in Small Island Developing States. Washington, DC: World Bank. A report jointly authored by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the Small Island States Resilience Initiative (SISRI) team in the Climate Change Group of the World Bank.Google Scholar
OECD, World Bank and UN Environment. (2018). Financing Climate Futures: Rethinking Infrastructure. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD Secretariat. (2005). Environmentally Harmful Subsidies: Policy Issues and Challenges. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD Secretariat. (2010a). Measuring support to energy. Background paper to the joint report by IEA, OPEC, OECD and World Bank on ‘Analysis of the scope of energy subsidies and suggestions for the G-20 Initiative’. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD Secretariat. (2010b). Measuring Support to Energy. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD Secretariat. (2011). Fossil-fuel support. OECD Secretariat background report to support the report on ‘Mobilizing climate finance’. Report prepared to the G20 Meeting of Finance Ministers, 14–15 October 2011.Google Scholar
OECD Secretariat. (2013). OECD Policy Guidance for Investment in Clean Energy Infrastructure. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD Secretariat. (2018). Implementing the Paris Agreement: Remaining Challenges and the Role of the OECD. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Oil Change International, Friends of the Earth U.S., The Sierra Club and WWF European Policy Office. (2017). Talk Is Cheap: How G20 Governments Are Financing Climate Disaster. Washington, DC: Oil Change International.Google Scholar
OPEC. (2016). World Oil Outlook. Vienna: OPEC.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2010). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20, 550–57.Google Scholar
Overland, I. (2010). Subsidies for fossil fuels and climate change: A comparative perspective. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 67(3), 303–17.Google Scholar
Park, S. (2010). World Bank Group Interactions with Environmentalists: Changing International Organisation Identities. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Park, S. and Vetterlein, A., eds. (2010a). Owning Development: Creating Policy Norms in the IMF and the World Bank. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Park, S. and Vetterlein, A. (2010b). Owning development: Creating policy norms in the IMF and the World Bank. In Park, S. and Vetterlein, A., eds., Owning Development: Creating Policy Norms in the IMF and the World Bank, pp. 1–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parry, I. (2015). Designing fiscal policy to address the external costs of energy. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 8, 1–56.Google Scholar
Parry, I. (2019). Putting a price on pollution. Finance and Development, 56(4), 16–21.Google Scholar
Parry, I., Heine, D., Kizzier, K. and Smith, T. (2018). Carbon Taxation for International Maritime Fuels: Assessing the Options. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
Parry, I., Heine, D., Lis, E. and Li, S. (2014). Getting Energy Prices Right: From Principle to Practice. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
Parry, I., Williams, R. C. and Morris, A. C. (2015). Implementing a US Carbon Tax: Challenges and Debates. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Paterson, M. and P‐Laberge, X. (2018). Political economies of climate change. WIREs: Climate Change, 9(2), 1–16.Google Scholar
Paul, B., Caroline, O., Joe, T., Laetitia, D. M. and Bianka, K. (2017). Net Climate Finance: Reconciling the Clean and Dirty Sides of the Finance Ledger. Boulder, CO: Rocky Mountain Institute.Google Scholar
Pauw, W. (2017). Mobilising private adaptation finance: Developed country perspectives. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17(1), 55.Google Scholar
Pearce, D. (1993). Economic Values and the Natural World, London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Pearce, D. (2002a). Environmentally harmful subsidies: Barriers to sustainable development. OECD workshop on environmentally harmful subsidies. Paris.Google Scholar
Pearce, D. (2002b). An intellectual history of environmental economics. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 27(1), 57–81.Google Scholar
Persson, Å. and Remling, E. (2014). Equity and efficiency in adaptation finance: Initial experiences of the Adaptation Fund. Climate Policy, 14(4), 488–506.Google Scholar
Peszko, G., Black, S. J., Platonova-Oquab, A., Heine, D. and Timilsina, G. R. (2019). Environmental Fiscal Reform in Morocco: Options and Pathways. Washington, DC.: World Bank Group.Google Scholar
Peterson, L. and Skovgaard, J. (2019). Bureaucratic politics and the allocation of climate finance. World Development, 117, 72–97.Google Scholar
Pickering, J., Betzold, C. and Skovgaard, J. (2017). Special Issue: Managing Fragmentation and Complexity in the Emerging System of International Climate Finance. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17(1).Google Scholar
Pickering, J., Jotzo, F. and Wood, P. J. (2015a). Sharing the global climate finance effort fairly with limited coordination. Global Environmental Politics, 15(4), 39–62.Google Scholar
Pickering, J. and Mitchell, P. (2017). What drives national support for multilateral climate finance? International and domestic influences on Australia’s shifting stance. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17(1), 107–25.Google Scholar
Pickering, J., Skovgaard, J., Kim, S., Roberts, J. T., Rossati, D., Stadelmann, M. and Reich, H. (2015b). Acting on climate finance pledges: Inter-agency dynamics and relationships with Aid in Contributor States. World Development, 68, 149–62.Google Scholar
Pigou, A. C. (1932). The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Polak, J. J. (1991). The changing nature of IMF conditionality. OECD Development Centre Working Paper No. 41. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Poll, C. (2016). Alternativet: Danmark støtter sort energi langt mere end andre lande. Altinget, 16 January.Google Scholar
Pop-Eleches, G. (2009). From Economic Crisis to Reform: IMF Programs in Latin American and Eastern Europe, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Porter, E. (2015). Promises of climate change aid now need money to back them up. New York Times, 30 September.Google Scholar
Potier, M. (2002). Summary and conclusions. OECD Workshop on Environmentally Harmful Subsidies, 7–8 November. Paris.Google Scholar
Rabe, B. G. (2018). Can We Price Carbon? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Raustiala, K. and Victor, D. (2004). The regime complex for plant genetic resources. International Organization, 58(2), 277–309.Google Scholar
Redman, J., Durand, A., Bustos, M. C., Baum, J. and Roberts, J. T. (2015). Walking the Talk? World Bank Energy-Related Policies and Financing 2000–2004 to 2010–2014. Providence, RI: Climate and Development Lab; The Institute for Policy Studies.Google Scholar
Rentschler, J. (2018). Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reforms, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rentschler, J. and Bazilian, M. (2017a). Principles for designing effective fossil fuel subsidy reforms. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 11(1), 138–55.Google Scholar
Rentschler, J. and Bazilian, M. (2017b). Reforming fossil fuel subsidies: Drivers, barriers and the state of progress. Climate Policy (Earthscan), 17(7), 891–914.Google Scholar
Rhinard, M. (2010). Framing Europe: The Policy Shaping Strategies of the European Commission, Dordrecht: Republic of Letters.Google Scholar
Rittberger, V., Zangl, B. and Kruck, A. (2012). International Organization, 2nd ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rive, V. (2018). Anatomy of an international norm entrepreneur. In Skovgaard, J. and van Asselt, H., eds., The Politics of Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Their Reform, pp. 156–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rive, V. (2019). Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reform: An International Law Response, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Robbins, N. (2017). Financing the Transition: How Climate Change Could Impact the Financial System. Nairobi: UNEP.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. T. and Weikmans, R. (2017). Postface: fragmentation, failing trust and enduring tensions over what counts as climate finance. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17(1), 129–37.Google Scholar
Roberts, N. C. and King, P. J. (1991). Policy entrepreneurs: Their activity structure and function in the policy process. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1(2), 147–75.Google Scholar
Roger, C. B. (2020). The Origins of Informality: Why the Legal Foundations of Global Governance Are Shifting, and Why It Matters, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Romera, B. M. and van Asselt, H. (2015). The international regulation of aviation emissions: Putting differential treatment into practice. Journal of Environmental Law, 27(2), 259–83.Google Scholar
Röttgers, D., Tandon, A. and Kaminker, C. (2018). OECD progress update on approaches to mobilising institutional investment for sustainable infrastructure. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Rübbelke, D. T. G. (2011). International support of climate change policies in developing countries: Strategic, moral and fairness aspects. Ecological Economics, 70(8), 1470–80.Google Scholar
Rucker, P. and Montgomery, L. (2011). Democrats target big oil companies. Washington Post, 11 May.Google Scholar
Ruffing, K. G. (2010). The role of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development in environmental policy making. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 4(2), 199–220.Google Scholar
Sabatier, P. A. and Weible, C. M. (2014). Theories of the Policy Process, 3rd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Said, M. E. and Leigh, D. (2006). Fuel price subsidies in Gabon: Fiscal cost and distributional impact. IMF Working Papers WP/06/243. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
Schalatek, L. (2012). Democratizing climate finance governance and the public funding of climate action. Democratization, 19(5), 951–73.Google Scholar
Schimank, U. and Volkmann, U., eds. (2012). The Marketization of Society: Economizing the Non-Economic. Bremen: Forschungsverbund ‘Welfare Societies’.Google Scholar
Schimmelfennig, F. (2001). The community trap: Liberal norms, rhetorical action, and the eastern enlargement of the European Union. International Organization, 55(1), 47–80.Google Scholar
Schimmelfennig, F., Engert, S. and Knobel, H. (2005). Costs, commitment and compliance: The impact of EU democratic conditionality on Latvia, Slovakia and Turkey. Journal of Common Market Studies, 41(3), 495–518.Google Scholar
Schmelzer, M. (2015). The growth paradigm: History, hegemony, and the contested making of economic growthmanship. Ecological Economics, 118(C), 262–71.Google Scholar
Schmidt, T. S., Matsuo, T. and Michaelowa, A. (2017). Renewable energy policy as an enabler of fossil fuel subsidy reform? Applying a socio-technical perspective to the cases of South Africa and Tunisia. Global Environmental Change, 45, 99–110.Google Scholar
Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 303–26.Google Scholar
Schön, D. A. and Rein, M. (1994). Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Schwartz, J. (2015). Global fossil fuel subsidies dwarf funding commitment to climate change. New York Times, 6 December.Google Scholar
Scott, S. (2017). The grant element method of measuring the concessionality of loans and debt relief. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Seabrooke, L. (2011). Economists and diplomacy: Professions and the practice of economic policy. International Journal: Canada’s Journal of Global Policy Analysis, 66(3), 629–42.Google Scholar
Seabrooke, L. (2012). Pragmatic numbers: The IMF, financial reform, and policy learning in least likely environments. Journal of International Relations and Development, 15(4), 486–505.Google Scholar
Sengupta, S. (2019). India’s engagement in global climate negotiations from Rio to Paris. In Dubash, N., ed. India in a Warming World: Integrating Climate Change and Development, pp. 114–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sethi, N. (2015). Developing countries irked by report saying climate change funds delivered. Business Standard, 23 October.Google Scholar
Setzer, J. and Nachmany, M. (2018). National governance: The state’s role in steering polycentric action. In Jordan, A., Huitema, D., van Asselt, H. and Forster, J., eds., Governing Climate Change: Polycentricity in Action?, pp. 47–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shandra, J. M., Shircliff, E. and London, B. (2011). The International Monetary Fund, World Bank, and structural adjustment: A cross-national analysis of forest loss. Social Science Research, 40(1), 210–25.Google Scholar
Sherry, H., Zaid, A., El-Badrawi, M. and Haber, J. (2014). Arab Uprisings and Social Justice Implications of IMF Subsidy Reform Policies. Washington, DC: New America Foundation.Google Scholar
Shin, A. and Eilperin, J. (2009). G-20 grabs bigger role in global economy; nations to collaborate to ward off future crises. Washington Post, 26 September.Google Scholar
Simmons, B. A., Dobbin, F. and Garrett, G. (2006). Introduction: The international diffusion of liberalism. International Organization, 60(4), 781–810.Google Scholar
Skovgaard, J. (2012). Learning about climate change: Finance ministries in international climate change politics. Global Environmental Politics, 12(4), 1–8.Google Scholar
Skovgaard, J. (2013). The limits of entrapment: The negotiations on EU reduction targets, 2007–11. JCMS-Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(6), 1141–57.Google Scholar
Skovgaard, J. (2014). EU climate policy after the crisis. Environmental Politics, 23(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
Skovgaard, J. (2015). Greener than expected? EU finance ministries address climate finance. Environmental Politics, 24(6), 951–69.Google Scholar
Skovgaard, J. (2017a). The devil lies in the definition: Competing approaches to fossil fuel subsidies at the IMF and the OECD. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17(3), 341–53.Google Scholar
Skovgaard, J. (2017b). Limiting costs or correcting market failures? Finance ministries and frame alignment in UN climate finance negotiations. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17(1), 89–106.Google Scholar
Skovgaard, J. (2017c). The role of finance ministries in environmental policy making: The case of European Union Emissions Trading System reform in Denmark, Germany and the Netherlands. Environmental Policy and Governance, 27(4), 351–64.Google Scholar
Skovgaard, J. (2018). International push, domestic reform? In Skovgaard, J. and van Asselt, H., eds., The Politics of Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Their Reform, pp. 100–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skovgaard, J. and Canavan, J. (2020). Carbon pricing: Overlaps and formal collaboration. In Zelli, F., Bäckstrand, K., Nasiritousi, N., Skovgaard, J. and Widerberg, O., eds., Governing the Climate-Energy Nexus: Challenges to Coherence, Legitimacy, and Effectiveness, pp. 156–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skovgaard, J. and Gallant, J. (2015). National delegations to UNFCCC Conferences of the Parties: Who participates? Lund and Amsterdam: Earth System Governance Project. Earth System Governance Working Paper No. 35.Google Scholar
Skovgaard, J., Pickering, J. and Betzold, C., eds. (2017). Special Issue: Managing Fragmentation and Complexity in the Emerging System of International Climate Finance. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17(1).Google Scholar
Skovgaard, J. and van Asselt, H.(2018a). Conclusions and ways forward. In Skovgaard, J. and van Asselt, H., eds., The Politics of Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Their Reform, pp. 305–18. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skovgaard, J. and van Asselt, H., eds. (2018b). The Politics of Fossil Fuel Subsidies and their Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skovgaard, J. and van Asselt, H. (2018c). The politics of fossil fuel subsidies and their reform. In Skovgaard, J. and van Asselt, H., eds., The Politics of Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Their Reform, pp. 3–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skovgaard, J. and van Asselt, H. (2019). The politics of fossil fuel subsidies and their reform: Implications for climate change mitigation. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 10(4), e581.Google Scholar
Slaughter, S. (2013). The prospects of deliberative global governance in the G20: Legitimacy, accountability, and public contestation. Review of International Studies, 39(1), 71–90.Google Scholar
Slaughter, S. (2015). The G20’s role in legitimating global capitalism: Beyond crisis diplomacy? Contemporary Politics, 21(4), 384–98.Google Scholar
Slaughter, S. (2017). The G20 and climate change: The transnational contribution of global summitry. Global Policy, 8(3), 285–93.Google Scholar
Smith, J. and Urpelainen, J. (2017). Removing fuel subsidies: How can international organizations support national policy reforms? International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17(3), 327–40.Google Scholar
Solow, R. M. (1974). The economics of resources or the resources of economics. The American Economic Review, 64(2), 1–14.Google Scholar
Soros, G. (2009). Financing the fight against climate change. Project Syndicate, 10 December.Google Scholar
Spash, C. L. (2007). The economics of climate change impacts à la Stern: Novel and nuanced or rhetorically restricted? Ecological Economics, 63(4), 706–13.Google Scholar
Stadelmann, M., Michaelowa, A. and Roberts, J. T. (2013). Difficulties in accounting for private finance in international climate policy. Climate Policy, 13(6), 718–37.Google Scholar
Stadelmann, M., Persson, Å. , Ratajczak-Juszko, I. and Michaelowa, A. (2014). Equity and cost-effectiveness of multilateral adaptation finance: Are they friends or foes? International Environmental Agreements-Politics Law and Economics, 14(2), 101–20.Google Scholar
Stadelmann, M., Roberts, J. T. and Michaelowa, A. (2011). New and additional to what? Assessing options for baselines to assess climate finance pledges. Climate and Development, 3(3), 175–92.Google Scholar
Steenblik, R. P. (1999). Previous Multilateral Efforts to Discipline Subsidies to Natural Resource Based Industries. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Steenblik, R. P. (2003). The subsidy scandal: How your government wastes your money to wreck your environment. Ecological Economics, 47(2–3), 213–15.Google Scholar
Steenblik, R. P. (2014). A global survey of potentially environmentally harmful subsidies. In Oosterhuis, F. H. and Brink, P. t., eds., In Paying the Polluter: Environmentally Harmful Subsidies and Their Reform, pp. 13–40. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Steenblik, R. P. (2016). An overview of the G20 and APEC voluntary peer reviews of fossil-fuel subsidies. International Conference on Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reform. Paris.Google Scholar
Steenblik, R. P. and OECD. (2003). Subsidy measurement and classification: Developing a common framework. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Steenblik, R. P., Sauvage, J. and Timiliotis, C. (2018). Fossil fuel subsidies and the global trade regime. In Skovgaard, J. and van Asselt, H., eds., The Politics of Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Their Reform, pp. 121–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stern, D. I., Jotzo, F. and Dobes, L. (2013). The economics of global climate change: A historical literature review. CCEP Working Paper 1307.Google Scholar
Stern, N. (2006). The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stevenson, H. (2019). Contemporary discourses of green political economy: A Q method analysis. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 21(5), 533–48.Google Scholar
Stieglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and Its Discontents, New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Stokke, O. S. (2001). The interplay of international regimes: Putting effectiveness theory to work. FNI Report 14/2001. Lysaker: Fridtjof Nansen Institute.Google Scholar
Stokke, O. S. (2012). Disaggregating International Regimes: A New Approach to Evaluation and Comparison, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stone, R. W. (2008). The scope of IMF conditionality. International Organization, 62(4), 589–620.Google Scholar
Storm, S. (2017). How the Invisible Hand is supposed to adjust the natural thermostat: A guide for the perplexed. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(5), 1307–31.Google Scholar
Strand, J. (2013). Political economy aspects of fuel subsidies: A conceptual framework. Policy Research Working Paper 6392. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Szulecki, K., Pattberg, P. and Biermann, F. (2011). Explaining variation in the effectiveness of transnational energy partnerships. Governance, (4), 713–36.Google Scholar
Tallberg, J., Sommerer, T., Squatrito, T. and Lundgren, M. (2016). The performance of international organizations: A policy output approach. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), 1077–96.Google Scholar
Terton, A., Gass, P., Merrill, L., Wagner, A. and Meyer, E. (2015). Fiscal instruments in INDCs: How countries are looking to fiscal policies to support INDC implementation. Geneva: IISD.Google Scholar
Thaker, J. and Leiserowitz, A. (2014). Shifting discourses of climate change in India. Climatic Change, 123, 107–19.Google Scholar
Thomsen, C. B. and Hannestad, A. (2015). Milliardærers penge lugter ikke. Politiken, 6 December.Google Scholar
Thunberg, G., Hinchliffe, J., Assis, D. F. d., et al. (2020). At Davos we will tell world leaders to abandon the fossil fuel economy. The Guardian, 10 January.Google Scholar
Thwaites, J. (2019). US climate finance improves with 2019 budget, but there’s still a Long way to go. World Resources Institute, 20 February.Google Scholar
Tienhaara, K. (2014). Varieties of green capitalism: Economy and environment in the wake of the global financial crisis. Environmental Politics, 23(2), 187–204.Google Scholar
Tienhaara, K. (2016). Governing the global green economy. Global Policy, 7(4), 481–90.Google Scholar
Times of India. (2015). OECD report exaggerates warming funding: Study. Times of India, 1 December.Google Scholar
Tol, R. S. J. (2011). The social cost of carbon. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 3, 419–43.Google Scholar
Tosun, J. and Peters, B. G. (2018). Intergovernmental organizations’ normative commitments to policy integration: The dominance of environmental goals. Environmental Science and Policy, 82, 90–99.Google Scholar
UK Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. (2019a). Answer to House of Commons Question 211670.Google Scholar
UK Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. (2019b). Answer to House of Commons Question 272194.Google Scholar
UK Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. (2019c). Answer to question from the House of Lords’ European Union Committee regarding fossil fuel subsidies.Google Scholar
UK Department of Energy and Climate Change and HM Treasury. (2013). Written evidence submitted by the Department of Energy and Climate Change and HM Treasury to the House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee.Google Scholar
UK Government. (2019). UK International Climate Finance.Google Scholar
Underdal, A. (1983). Causes of negotiation ‘failure’. European Journal of Political Research, 11(2), 183.Google Scholar
UNDP. (2012). Innovative Financing for Development: A New Model for Development Finance? New York: UNDP.Google Scholar
UNEP. (2019). Fossil fuel subsidy reform. Available at: www.unenvironment.org/explore-topics/green-economy/what-we-do/economic-and-fiscal-policy/fiscal-policy/policy-analysis-3 (accessed 20 December 2019).Google Scholar
UNEP, OECD and IISD. (2019). Measuring Fossil Fuel Subsidies in the Context of the Sustainable Development Goals. Nairobi: UN Environment.Google Scholar
UNFCCC. (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Document FCCC/INFORMAL/84.Google Scholar
UNFCCC. (1997). Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Document FCCC/CP/1997/L.7/Add.1Google Scholar
UNFCCC. (2009a). Decision 2/CP.15. Copenhagen Accord. Document FCCC/CP/2009/11/Add.1Google Scholar
UNFCCC. (2009b). Non-paper No. 54: Contact group on enhanced action on the provision of financial resources and investment.Google Scholar
UNFCCC. (2015). Decision 1/CP.21 Paris Agreement. Document FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1.Google Scholar
UNFCCC Standing Committee on Finance. (2014). 2014 Biennial Assessment and Overview of Climate Finance Flows Report. Bonn: United Nations Climate Change Secretariat (UNFCCC).Google Scholar
UNFCCC Standing Committee on Finance. (2016). 2016 Biennial Assessment and Overview of Climate Finance Flows Report. Bonn: United Nations Climate Change Secretariat (UNFCCC).Google Scholar
UNFCCC Standing Committee on Finance. (2018). 2018 Biennial Assessment and Overview of Climate Finance Flows – Technical Report. Bonn: United Nations Climate Change Secretariat (UNFCCC).Google Scholar
UNFCCC Standing Committee on Finance. (2020). Background. Available at: https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/bodies/constituted-bodies/standing-committee-on-finance-scf/background (accessed 23 June 2020).Google Scholar
United Nations. (2010). Report of the Secretary-General’s High-level Advisory Group on Climate Change Financing. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Document A/RES/70/1.Google Scholar
United Nations, Inter-agency Task Force on Financing for Development. (2019). Financing for Sustainable Development Report 2019. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative. (2020). About United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative. Available at: https://www.unepfi.org/about/ (accessed 23 June 2020).Google Scholar
US Government (2014). United States: Progress report on fossil fuel subsidies. Washington, DC: Department of the Treasury.Google Scholar
US Government. (2015). United States self-review of fossil fuel subsidies.Google Scholar
Vallejo, L., Moarif, S. and Halimanjaya, A. (2017). Enhancing mitigation and finance reporting: Building on current experience to meet the Paris Agreement requirements. Climate Change Expert Group Paper No. 2017(6). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
van Asselt, H. and Kulovesi, K. (2017). Seizing the opportunity: Tackling fossil fuel subsidies under the UNFCCC. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17(3), 357–70.Google Scholar
van Asselt, H., Merrill, L. and Kulovesi, K. (2018). Fossil fuel subsidies and the global climate regime. In van Asselt, H. and Skovgaard, J., eds., The Politics of Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Their Reform, pp. 140–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Asselt, H. and Van de Graaf, T., eds. (2017). Special Issue: The International Governance of Energy Subsidies. International Environmental Agreements, Politics, Law and Economics, 17(3).Google Scholar
Van de Graaf, T. and Blondeel, M. (2018). Fossil fuel subsidy reform: An international norm perspective. In Skovgaard, J. and van Asselt, H., eds., The Politics of Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Their Reform, pp. 83–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van de Graaf, T. and Colgan, J. (2016). Global energy governance: A review and research agenda. Palgrave Communications, 2(15047).Google Scholar
Van de Graaf, T. and Westphal, K. (2011). The G8 and G20 as global steering committees for energy: Opportunities and constraints. Global Policy, 2(s1), 19–30.Google Scholar
Verkuijl, C. and van Asselt, H. (2020). Fossil fuel subsidy reform: Interactions between international cooperative institutions. The more the merrier? In Zelli, F., Bäckstrand, K., Nasiritousi, N., Skovgaard, J. and Widerberg, O., eds., Governing the Climate-Energy Nexus: Institutional Complexity and Its Challenges to Effectiveness and Legitimacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vetterlein, A. and Moschella, M. (2014). International organizations and organizational fields: Explaining policy change in the IMF. European Political Science Review, 6(1), 143–65.Google Scholar
Victor, D. (2009). The Politics of Fossil Fuel Subsidies. Untold Billions: Fossil Fuel Subsidies, Their Impacts and the Path to Reform. Geneva: IISD.Google Scholar
Victor, D. (2011). Global Warming Gridlock: Creating More Effective Strategies for Protecting the Planet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vidal, J. (2014a). Rich countries ‘backsliding’ on climate finance. The Guardian, 18 November.Google Scholar
Vidal, J. (2014b). Rich countries subsidising oil, gas and coal companies by $88bn a year. The Guardian, 11 November.Google Scholar
Vorobyova, T. and Willard, A. (2009). G20 makes little progress on climate financing. Reuters, 7 November.Google Scholar
Vreeland, J. (2007). The International Monetary Fund: Politics of Conditional Lending, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vroey, M. D. and Pensieroso, L. (2016). The rise of a mainstream in economics. Discussion Papers. Louvain: Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES).Google Scholar
Watkins, K. (2013). This gamble on carbon and the climate could trigger a new financial crisis. The Guardian, 2 August.Google Scholar
Weale, A., Pridham, G., Williams, A. and Porter, M. (1996). Environmental administration in six European states: Secular convergence or national distinctiveness? Public Administration, 74(2), 255–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weikmans, R., van Asselt, H. and Roberts, J. T. (2020). Transparency requirements under the Paris Agreement and their (un)likely impact on strengthening the ambition of nationally determined contributions (NDCs). Climate Policy, 20(4), 511–26.Google Scholar
Weikmans, R. and Roberts, J. T. (2018). It’s déjà vu all over again: Climate finance at COP24. Brookings Institution. Available at: www.brookings.edu/blog/planetpolicy/2018/12/06/its-deja-vu-all-over-again-climate-finance-at-cop24/ (accessed 23 June 2020).Google Scholar
Weikmans, R. and Roberts, J. T. (2019). The international climate finance accounting muddle: is there hope on the horizon? Climate and Development, 11(2),97–111.Google Scholar
Weikmans, R., Roberts, J. T., Baum, J., Bustos, M. C. and Durand, A. (2017). Assessing the credibility of how climate adaptation aid projects are categorised. Development in Practice, 27(4), 458–71.Google Scholar
Weiler, F., Kloeck, C. and Dornan, M. (2018). Vulnerability, good governance, or donor interests? The allocation of aid for climate change adaptation. World Development, 104, 65–77.Google Scholar
Weiss, E. B. and Jacobson, H. K. (1999). Getting countries to comply with international agreements. Environment, 41(6), 16–23.Google Scholar
Weitzman, M. L. (2007). A review of the Stern Review on the economics of climate change. Journal of Economic Literature, 45(3), 703–24.Google Scholar
Wenzlaff, F. (2019). Economization of society: Functional differentiation and economic stagnation. Journal of Economic Issues, 53(1), 57–80.Google Scholar
Whitley, S., Thwaites, J., Wright, H. and Ott, C. (2018). Making finance consistent with climate goals: Insights for operationalising Article 2.1c of the UNFCCC Paris Agreement. London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
Widerberg, O. and Stenson, D. E. (2013). Climate clubs and the UNFCCC. Stockholm: FORES. Study 2013:3.Google Scholar
Wiener, A. (2004). Contested compliance: Interventions on the normative structure of world politics. European Journal of International Relations, 10(2), 189–234.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, A. (1986). Budgeting: A Comparative Theory of Budgetary Processes, 2nd ed. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Wilshusen, P. R. and MacDonald, K. I. (2017). Fields of green: Corporate sustainability and the production of economistic environmental governance. Environment and Planning A, 49, 1824–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, N. (2006). The Globalizers: The IMF, The World Bank, and Their Borrowers, London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. (1983). The Energy Transition in Developing Countries. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. (2010). Monitoring Climate Finance and ODA. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. (2013a). Accessing International Climate Change Related Finance in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. (2013b). From Universal Price Subsidies to Modern Social Assistance: The Political Economy of Reform. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. (2015). Energy Subsidy Reform and Delivery Technical Assistance Facility. Energy Sector Management Assistance Program. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. (2017). Results-based climate finance in practice: Delivering climate finance for Low-Carbon Development. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. (2018). Strategic Use of Climate Finance to Maximize Climate Action: A Guiding Framework. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.Google Scholar
World Bank. (2020a). Climate change knowledge portal. Available at: https://climateknowledgeportal.worldbank.org (accessed 23 June 2020).Google Scholar
World Bank. (2020b). State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2020. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. (2020c). World Bank Data: GDP (current USD).Google Scholar
World Bank, ESMAP and European Commission. (2015). Energy subsidy reform and delivery technical assistance facility. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank, IFC and MIGA. (2016). World Bank Group Climate Change Action Plan 2016–2020. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank Group, IMF, OECD, African Development Bank, Asian Development Bank, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, European Investment Bank and Inter-American Development Bank. (2011). Mobilizing Climate Finance – A Paper prepared at the request of G20 Finance Ministers.Google Scholar
World Bank with contributions from International Monetary Fund (IMF), International Energy Agency (IEA), International Energy Forum (IEF), Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), OPEC Fund for International Development (OFID), Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). (2014). Transitional policies to assist the poor while phasing out inefficient fossil fuel subsidies that encourage wasteful consumption. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization. (1994). Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (ASCM).Google Scholar
Young, O. R. (2001). Inferences and indices: Evaluating the effectiveness of international environmental regimes. Global Environmental Politics, 1(1), 99–121.Google Scholar
Zelli, F. (2011). The fragmentation of the global climate governance architecture. WIREs: Climate Change, 2(2), 255–70.Google Scholar
Zelli, F. and van Asselt, H. (2013). The institutional fragmentation of global environmental governance: Causes, consequences, and responses. Global Environmental Politics, 13(3), 1–13.Google Scholar
Zelli, F., Nasiritousi, N., Bäckstrand, K., et al. (2020). Analytical framework: Assessing coherence, management, legitimacy, and effectiveness. In Zelli, F., Bäckstrand, K., Nasiritousi, N., Skovgaard, J. and Widerberg, O., eds., Governing the Climate-Energy Nexus: Institutional Complexity and Its Challenges to Effectiveness and Legitimacy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, L., Deitelhoff, N. and Lesch, M. (2017). Unlocking the agency of the governed: contestation and norm dynamics. Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal, 2(5), 691–708.Google Scholar
Zinecker, A., Gass, P., Gerasimchuk, I., et al. (2018). Real people, real change: Strategies for just energy transitions. Geneva: IISD.Google Scholar
Zürn, M. (2014). The politicization of world politics and its effects: Eight propositions. European Political Science Review, 6(1), 47–71.Google Scholar
Zürn, M. and Faude, B. (2013). On fragmentation, differentiation, and coordination. Global Environmental Politics, 13(3), 119–30.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Jakob Skovgaard, Lunds Universitet, Sweden
  • Book: The Economisation of Climate Change
  • Online publication: 11 March 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108688048.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Jakob Skovgaard, Lunds Universitet, Sweden
  • Book: The Economisation of Climate Change
  • Online publication: 11 March 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108688048.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Jakob Skovgaard, Lunds Universitet, Sweden
  • Book: The Economisation of Climate Change
  • Online publication: 11 March 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108688048.016
Available formats
×