Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tzmfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T21:00:07.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ‘economy for the common good’, job quality and workers’ well-being in Austria and Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Laia Ollé-Espluga ,
Johanna Muckenhuber  and
Markus Hadler
Laia Ollé-Espluga
Affiliation:
University of Graz, Austria
Johanna Muckenhuber
Affiliation:
FH Joanneum University of Applied Science, Austria
Markus Hadler*
Affiliation:
University of Graz, Austria; Macquarie University, Australia
*
Markus Hadler, Department of Sociology, University of Graz, Universitaetsstrasse 15, 8010 Graz, Austria. Email: markus.hadler@uni-graz.at
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Economy for the Common Good movement proposes an alternative economic model, which promises to offset many of the detrimental effects of the contemporary labour market. Yet, despite its increasing economic and social relevance in Europe, there is little research on Economy for the Common Good firms and the quality of the jobs they offer their employees. We thus, first, introduce the ideas of this movement and then present findings on workplace characteristics and the well-being of workers. Our results are based on our own survey of Economy for the Common Good employees from 2018 and on the sixth wave of the European Working Conditions Survey. Our analyses offer mixed support for the claims of the Economy for the Common Good – while Economy for the Common Good workers can be found in high-quality work settings, their absenteeism and presenteeism, as well as indicators of control, time pressure, direct participation and financial participation do not differ from other workers when controlled in a propensity score matching approach. Based on our findings and feedback from Economy for the Common Good representatives, we conclude that the introduction of Eonomy for the Common Good ideas might be too recent to see any positive effects, but also that Economy for the Common Good companies should place more focus on their employees’ well-being.

Keywords

P40P52J81I14AbsenteeismAustriaeconomy for the common goodemployment conditionsGermanyjob qualitypresenteeismsocial economyworking conditions
Type
Original Articles
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , March 2021 , pp. 3 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ariza-Montes, A, Lucia-Casademunt, AM (2016) Nonprofit versus for-profit organizations: a European overview of employees’ work conditions. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance 40(4): 334–351.Google Scholar
Atkinson, W (2010) The myth of the reflexive worker: class and work histories in neo-liberal times. Work, Employment and Society 24(3): 413–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailly, F, Chapelle, K, Prouteau, L (2012) La qualité de l’emploi dans L’ESS: Etude exploratoire sur la région des Pays de la Loire. Revue internationale de l’économie sociale (Recma) 323: 44–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basterretxea, I, Heras-Saizarbitoria, I, Lertxundi, A (2019) Can employee ownership and human resource management policies clash in worker cooperatives? Lessons from a defunct cooperative. Human Resource Management 58(6): 585–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benach, J, Vives, A, Amable, M , et al. (2014) Precarious employment: understanding an emerging social determinant of health. Annual Review of Public Health 35: 229–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benavides, FG, Benach, J, Diez-Roux, AV , et al. (2000) How do types of employment relate to health indicators? Findings from the Second European Survey on Working Conditions. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 54(7): 494–501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benz, M (2005) Not for the profit, but for the satisfaction? – Evidence on worker well-being in non-profit firms. Kyklos 58(2): 155–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blachfellner, M, Drosg-Plöckinger, A, Fieber, S , et al. (2017) Workbook Compact Balance Sheet 5.0. Matrix Development Team. Available at: https://www.ecogood.org/media/filer_public/5d/4d/5d4d17bc-156b-44ec-9115-fe6b37c63187/ecg_compact_balance_sheet_workbook.pdf (accessed 12 April 2017).Google Scholar
Cace, S, Stănescu, SM (2013) Role of the social economy to increase social inclusion. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 92: 117–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caliendo, M, Kopeinig, S (2008) Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys 22(1): 31–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carneiro, IG, Rasmussen, CDN, Jørgensen, MB , et al. (2013) The association between health and sickness absence among Danish and non-Western immigrant cleaners in Denmark. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 86(4): 397–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casini, A, Bensliman, R, Callorda Fossati, E , et al. (2018) Is social innovation fostering satisfaction and well-being at work? Insights from employment in social enterprises providing long-term eldercare services. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 29: 1244–1260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaves, R, Monzón, JL (2018) La economía social ante los paradigmas económicos emergentes: innovación social, economía colaborativa, economía circular, responsabilidad social empresarial, economía del bien común, empresa social y economía solidaria. CIRIEC-España, revista de economía pública, social y cooperativa 93: 5–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commission EU and European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises (EURICSE) (2013) Social Economy and Social Entrepreneurship: Social Europe Guide, vol. 4. Brussels: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
Deinert, S (2019) Gutachten zur Gemeinwohl-Ökonomie. Fulda: Hochschule Fulda.Google Scholar
Demerouti, E, Le Blanc, PM, Bakker, AB , et al. (2009) Present but sick: a three-wave study on job demands, presenteeism and burnout. The Career Development International 14(1): 50–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Economy for the Common Good (ECG) (2017) Common good matrix. Available at: https://www.ecogood.org/en/common-good-balance-sheet/common-good-matrix/ (accessed 25 May 2018).Google Scholar
Economy for the Common Good (ECG) (2019a) 3. Common good report. Available at: https://www.ecogood.org/en/our-work/common-good-balance-sheet/companies/3-common-good-report/ (accessed 9 December 2018).Google Scholar
Economy for the Common Good (ECG) (2019b) Common good matrix. Available at: https://www.ecogood.org/en/our-work/common-good-balance-sheet/common-good-matrix/ (accessed 9 December 2019).Google Scholar
Economy for the Common Good (ECG) (2019c) Development and achievements. Available at: https://www.ecogood.org/en/vision/development-and-achievements/ (accessed 13 January 2020).Google Scholar
Eurofound (2017) European Working Conditions Survey Integrated Data File, 1991–2015 (Data Collection). Colchester: UK Data Service.Google Scholar
Felber, C (2012) La economía del bien común: un modelo económico que supera la dicotomía entre capitalismo y comunismo para maximizar el bienestar de nuestra sociedad. Barcelona: Ediciones Deusto.Google Scholar
Felber, C, Hagelberg, G (2017) The Economy for Common Good: A Workable, Transformative Ethics-Based Alternative. Washington, DC: The Next System Project.Google Scholar
Fulton, L (2013) Worker Representation in Europe. London: Labour Research Department and ETUI. Available at: http://www.worker-participation.eu/National-Industrial-Relations (accessed 24 April 2014).Google Scholar
Grunberg, L, Moore, S, Greenberg, E (1996) The relationship of employee ownership and participation to workplace safety. Economic and Industrial Democracy 17(2): 221–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, CD, Andersen, JH (2008) Going ill to work – what personal circumstances, attitudes and work-related factors are associated with sickness presenteeism? Social Science and Medicine 67(6): 956–964.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janssens, H, Braeckman, L, De Clercq, B , et al. (2017) The relation between indicators of low employment quality and attendance behavior in countries of the European Union. Journal of Public Health 39(4): e127–e133.Google ScholarPubMed
Johansen, K, Bihrmann, K, Mikkelsen, S , et al. (2009) Trends in sickness absence in Denmark. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health 35(5): 334–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lanfranchi, J, Narcy, M (2008) Différence de satisfaction dans l’emploi entre secteurs à but lucratif et à but non lucratif: le rôle joué par les caractéristiques d’emploi. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 79(2): 323–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewchuk, W (2017) Precarious jobs: where are they, and how do they affect well-being? The Economic and Labour Relations Review 28(3): 402–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMullen, KE, Schellenberg, G (2003) Job Quality in Non-Profit Organizations. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Policy Research Networks.Google Scholar
Martinez, LF, Ferreira, AI (2012) Sick at work: Presenteeism among nurses in a Portuguese public hospital. Stress and Health 28(4): 297–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miraglia, M, Johns, G (2016) Going to work ill: a meta-analysis of the correlates of presenteeism and a dual-path model. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 21(3): 261–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mischkowski, NS, Funcke, S, Kress-Ludwig, M , et al. (2018) Die gemeinwohl-bilanz – Ein instrument zur bindung und gewinnung von mitarbeitenden und kund*innen in kleinen und mittleren unternehmen? NachhaltigkeitsManagementForum/Sustainability Management Forum 26(1): 123–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monzón, JL, Chaves, R (2017) Recent Evolutions of the Social Economy in the European Union. Brussels: European Economic and Social Committee; CIRIEC.Google Scholar
Navarro, A, Salas-Nicás, S, Llorens, C , et al. (2019) Sickness presenteeism: are we sure about what we are studying? A research based on a literature review and an empirical illustration. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 62(7): 580–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niedhammer, I, Sultan-Taïeb, H, Chastang, J-F , et al. (2012) Exposure to psychosocial work factors in 31 European countries. Occupational Medicine 62(3): 196–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ollé-Espluga, L, Bartoll, X (2019) Health status and job satisfaction of worker cooperative members in the Basque country in a time of economic uncertainty. ICA Review of International Cooperation 105: 83–101.Google Scholar
Ollé-Espluga, L, Muckenhuber, J, Hadler, M (2019) Job Quality in Economy for the Common Good Firms in Austria and Germany (Working paper CIRIEC 2019/21). Brussels: Centre international de recherches et d’information sur l’économie publique, sociale et cooperative (CIRIEC).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuter, M, Wahrendorf, M, Di Tecco, C , et al. (2019) Do temporary workers more often decide to work while sick? Evidence for the link between employment contract and presenteeism in Europe. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16(10): 1868.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richez-Battesti, N, Petrella, F, Melnik, E (2011) Quelle qualité de l’emploi au sein de l’économie sociale et solidaire? Premiers résultats sur données françaises. Revue Internationale de l’Economie Sociale (Recma) 319: 57–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, DB (1973) Matching to remove bias in observational studies. Biometrics 29(1): 159–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchis, JR, Campos, V, Ejarque, A (2019) Economy for the Common Good Model: Statistical Validation of Its Metrics and Impacts in the Business Sphere. València: Chair in Economy for the Common Good.Google Scholar
Sanwald, A, Theurl, E (2014) Atypical Employment and Health: A Meta-Analysis (Working Paper, May). Innsbruck: Faculty of Economics and Statistics, University of Innsbruck. Available at: https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/innwpaper/2014-15.htm (accessed 27 November 2019).Google Scholar
Taloyan, M, Aronsson, G, Leineweber, C , et al. (2012) Sickness presenteeism predicts suboptimal self-rated health and sickness absence: a nationally representative study of the Swedish working population. PLoS ONE 7(9): e44721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Underhill, E, Quinlan, M (2011) How precarious employment affects health and safety at work: the case of temporary agency workers. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations 66(3): 397–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Virtanen, M, Kivimäki, M, Joensuu, M , et al. (2005) Temporary employment and health: a review. International Journal of Epidemiology 34(3): 610–622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagner, EM, Ecker, D (2017) Entspricht die Gemeinwohl-Bilanzierung 5.0 den Vorgaben der unternehmerischen Berichtspflicht des österreichischen Nachhaltigkeits- und Diversitätsverbesserungsgesetzes (NaDiVeG) vom 17.01.2017? Linz: Johannes Keppler Universität Linz.Google Scholar
Warhurst, C, Wright, S, Lyonette, C (2017) Understanding and Measuring Job Quality: Part 1 – Thematic Literature Review. London: CIPD.Google Scholar
Wilson, S, Ebert, N (2013) Precarious work: economic, sociological and political perspectives. The Economic and Labour Relations Review 24(3): 263–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Ollé-Espluga et.al supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 530.4 KB