Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T00:38:19.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hypolipidaemic effect of maize starch with different amylose content in ovariectomized rats depends on intake amount of resistant starch

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2008

Xiong Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Resources, Faculty of Agriculture, Ehime University, Matsuyama790-8566, Japan College of Food Science, Southwest University, Chongging400716, China
Hiroshi Ogawa
Affiliation:
Faculty of Human and Cultural Studies, Tezukayamagakuin University, 4-2-2 Harumidai, Minami-ku, Sakai-city590-0113, Osaka, Japan
Taro Kishida
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Resources, Faculty of Agriculture, Ehime University, Matsuyama790-8566, Japan
Kiyoshi Ebihara*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Resources, Faculty of Agriculture, Ehime University, Matsuyama790-8566, Japan
*
*Corresponding author: Dr Kiyoshi Ebihara, fax +81 89 946 9847, email ebihara@agr.ehime-u.ac.jp
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of amylose content on digestibility of starch in the small intestine and on the concentration of plasma lipid were studied in ileorectostomized rats and in ovariectomized rats, respectively. Seven kinds of starch with different amylose content (0, 27, 54, 62, 76, 79, 86 %) were used as test starch, which contained 0·4, 5·6, 37·1, 40·2, 45·6, 36·9 and 36·1 % resistant starch (RS), respectively. Rats were fed one of test diets containing 30 % test starch with different amylose content for 14 d in ileorectostomized and for 21 d in ovariectomized rats. Food intake was not significantly different among the groups. In ileorectostomized rats, the small intestinal starch digestibility decreased with increasing intakes of amylose and RS. In ovariectomized rats, body weight gain was lower on the higher amylose maize starch diets. The concentrations of plasma TAG and cholesterol decreased with increasing intake of RS. The concentrations of liver total lipids and TAG decreased with increasing intake of RS, but that of liver cholesterol did not. There was significant positive correlation between the level of sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c mRNA and concentration of liver TAG. Total SCFA amount in the caecum increased logarithmically with increasing dry weight of caecal contents. The amount of bile acids in the small intestinal content and the excretions of bile acids and neutral steroids in faeces increased with increasing RS intake. These results show that starch rich in RS is more effective in preventing ovarian hormone deficiency-induced hyperlipidaemia.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2008

It is well known that lipid metabolism is influenced by sex hormones in animals and man(Reference Gevers Leuven1, Reference Shono, Kumagai and Sasaki2). Sex hormones such as oestrogen have a major impact on atherosclerotic processes. Oestrogen deficiency is associated with changes in cholesterol levels. Studies in animal models have shown that oestrogen inhibits the development of atherosclerotic lesions(Reference Sullivan, Karas, Aronovitz, Faller, Ziar, Smith, O'Donnell and Mendelsohn3, Reference Chen, Li, Durand, Oparil and Chen4).

Starch consists of two types of molecule, amylose and amylopectin. The amylose content is an important factor that determines the digestibility of starch. Starches with higher amylose content are found to be more resistant to digestion. The amylose content of starches is thus the major cause of resistant starch (RS) formation.

High amylose maize starch (HAMS) has been reported to reduce plasma cholesterol concentrations in rats(Reference de Deckere, Kloots and van Amelsvoort5Reference Kishida, Nogami, Himeno and Ebihara8). The physico-chemical properties of HAMS are affected by RS content, which are expected to influence its physiological effects. HAMS is genetic varieties of starch containing over 40 % amylose. However, it is not known if differences in the RS content in HAMS affects plasma cholesterol concentration in oestrogen-deficient rats. In addition, there have been few systematic studies of one kind of starch with different amylose/amylopectin contents.

Therefore, in the present study, we compared the influence of maize starch with different amylose content on the change in lipid metabolism associated with oestrogen deficiency in ovariectomized rats.

Materials and methods

Test starches

Waxy maize starch (AL-0), normal maize starch (AL-27) and five kinds of HAMS (AL-54, AL-62, AL-76, AL-79, AL-86) were donated from the National Starch and Chemical Co. (Chicago, IL, USA). Amylose content was measured using commercial kits (Amylose/Amylopectin Assay Kit; Biocon Japan Ltd, Nagoya, Japan). RS content was measured using commercial kits (Resistant Starch Assay Kit; Biocon Japan Ltd). Amylose content of AL-0, AL-27, AL-54, AL-62, AL-76, AL-79 and AL-86 was 0, 26·8, 53·8, 61·6, 75·7, 78·9 and 85·8 g/100 g, respectively. The RS content of AL-0, AL-27, AL-54, AL-62, AL-76, AL-79 and AL-86 was 0·4, 5·6, 37·1, 40·2, 45·6, 36·9 and 36·1 g/100 g, respectively.

Animals and diets

The present study was approved by the Laboratory Animal Care Committee of Ehime University, and the rats were maintained in accordance with the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of Ehime University.

Wistar rats (Japan SLC, Hamamatsu, Japan) were housed individually in screen-bottomed, stainless steel cages in a room maintained at 23 ± 1°C with a 12 h light–dark cycle (light 07.00–19.00 hours). In the experiment, rats were allowed free access to one of the following seven diets: AL-0, AL-27, AL-54, AL-62, AL-76, AL-79 or AL-86 (Table 1). Body weight and food intake were recorded daily in the morning before replacing the food.

Table 1 Composition of diets (g/kg)

The vitamin mixture contained 20 g choline bitartrate/100 g.

Cellulose powder, PC200 (Danisco Japan Ltd, Tokyo, Japan).

§ Content of AL-0, AL-27, AL-54, AL-62, AL-76, AL-79 and AL-86 was 0, 26·8, 53·8, 61·6, 75·7, 78·9 and 85·8 g/100 g, respectively.

Content of AL-0, AL-27, AL-54, AL-62, AL-76, AL-79 and AL-86 was 0·4, 5·6, 37·1, 40·2, 45·6, 36·9 and 36·1 g/100 g, respectively.

Experiment 1

Starch and RS digestibilities were examined in ileorectostomized rats. After acclimation to the AIN93G-based diet without cellulose for 7 d, Wistar female rats weighing about 200–230 g were subjected to ileorectostomy in which the distal ileum is anastomosed to the rectum, described previously(Reference Morita, Kasaoka, Ohhashi, Ikai, Numasaki and Kiriyama9). Rats subjected to the operation were not allowed food and water for the first 24 h after operation, and were intramuscularly injected with 0·01ml Mycillin Sol (containing procaine penicillin G (200 g/l) and dihydrostreptomucin sulphate (250 g/l); Toyo Jozo, Shizuoka, Japan) for the first 3 d after surgery. Then, rats were freely fed the AIN93G-based diet without cellulose for 10 d. Constant growth rates (5–7 g body weight gain/d) was achieved with this diet after 5 d. After postoperative recovery, rats (250–300 g) were divided into six groups (n 6) on the basis of body weight. Rats were allowed free access to one of the following six diets for 14 d: AL-27, AL-54, AL-62, AL-76, AL-79 or AL-86 (Table 1). Ileorectostomy effluents were collected for the last 4 d of the experimental period, freeze-dried and stored at − 50°C until analysis. Starch and RS digestibility was calculated as follows:

Starch and RS intakes were calculated from the food intake for the last 4 d of the experimental period, and from starch and RS content in each diet. The starch and RS contents in the diets and ileorectostomy effluents were determined using the commercial kits (Total Starch Assay Kit and Resistant Starch Assay Kit).

Experiment 2

Six-month-old female Wistar rats were acclimated by feeding a commercial solid diet (Roden Lab Diet EQ; PMI, USA) for 7 d. After acclimation, rats were anaesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of sodium pentobarbital (30 mg/kg body; Nembutal, Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL, USA), and bilaterally ovariectomized, after which they were randomly divided into seven groups (n 6), and were allowed free access to one of the following diets for 21 d: AL-0, AL-27, AL-54, AL-62, AL-76, AL-79 or AL-86 (Table 1). Before the animals were killed, faeces were collected from each rat on the final 4 d of the experimental period. The faeces were freeze-dried, weighed and milled.

On the last day of the experiment, a blood sample was collected from the neck of each rat at night into a blood collection tube (Vacutainer; Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) that contained heparin as an anticoagulant. The plasma was separated by centrifugation at 1400 g at 4°C for 15 min, and was stored at − 50°C until analysis. After blood collection, the liver was immediately perfused with cold saline (9 g NaCl/l), removed, washed with cold saline, blotted dry on filter paper, weighed and stored at − 50°C until analysis. After the liver was removed, the small intestine and caecum were removed. The contents of the small intestine were transferred into a pre-weighed tube, freeze-dried and weighed. The caecum was weighed, then 0·4 g of the caecal contents were transferred into a tube and 2 ml 10 mmol sodium hydroxide/l was immediately added and the mixture was used for SCFA analysis; an aqueous solution containing 0·5 g crotonic acid/l was used as an internal standard. The moisture level of the caecal contents was determined as the difference between the wet mass and the dry mass of the caecal contents after freeze-drying. The caecal wall was flushed with ice-cold saline (9 g NaCl/l, 4°C), blotted on to filter paper and weighed.

Estimation of energy intake

Energy from available starch, casein and maize oil was estimated to be 16·7 kJ/g (4 kcal/g), 16·7 kJ/g (4 kcal/g) and 37·6 kJ/g (9 kcal/g), respectively. Part of the ingested maize starch that travels to the large intestine without being digested is utilized as a fermentation substrate by microflora, and is converted into various organic acids such as SCFA. The energy produced by fermentation of unavailable maize starch is estimated to be 7·1 kJ/g (1·7 kcal/g)(Reference Livesey10). However, the digestibility of AL-0 in the small intestine and in the large intestine was assumed to be 100 and 0 %, respectively. Energy intake in the experiment period was estimated as follows:

where P is the energy from casein = casein intake (g/3 weeks) × 16·7 kJ; F is the energy from maize oil = Maize oil intake (g/3 weeks) × 37·6 kJ; DS is the energy from starch digested in the small intestine = Starch intake (g/3 weeks) × (Starch digestibility in Expt 1)/100 × 16·7 kJ; UDS is the energy from starch digested in the large intestine = Starch intake (g)/3 weeks × (Starch digestibility in Expt 2 − Starch digestibility in Expt 1)/100 × 7·1 kJ.

Biochemical analysis

The concentrations of total-cholesterol (total-C), HDL-cholesterol and TAG in the plasma were determined enzymatically using commercial diagnostic kits (Cholesterol E-Test Wako, HDL Cholesterol Test Wako and Triglyceride E-Test Wako; Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan). The concentration of non-HDL-cholesterol was calculated by subtracting the concentration of HDL-cholesterol concentration from the total-C concentration.

The level of liver total lipids was determined gravimetrically after extraction by the method of Folch et al. (Reference Folch, Lees and Sloane Stanley11). The liver TAG and cholesterol concentrations were determined enzymatically as described elsewhere(Reference Carr, Andresen and Rudel12). Steroids were extracted from the digestive contents (small intestine and caecum) and faeces by a mixture of chloroform–methanol (1:1, v/v) at 70°C for 60 h(Reference Eneroth, Hellstrom and Sjovall13). The concentrations of bile acids in caecal contents and faeces were determined enzymatically by the 3α-dehydrogenase assay method of Sheltaway & Losowsky(Reference Sheltaway and Losowsky14) using taurocholic acid as standard. The concentrations of cholesterol and coprostanol in small intestinal contents and faeces were analysed by capillary GLC (Model HP5890A; Hewlett Packard, Palo Alto, CA, USA) equipped with a flame-ionization detector and a capillary column (30 m × 0·53 mm inner diameter) coated with DB-1 (J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA, USA)(Reference Kishida, Ishikawa, Tsukaoka, Ohga, Ogawa and Ebihara15). The oven temperature was 260°C and the flow rate of helium carrier gas was 16·9 ml/min. 5α-Cholestane (Nacalai Tesque Inc., Kyoto, Japan) was used as the initial standard for neutral sterol analysis. The concentration and composition of bile acid in the small intestinal contents was analysed by capillary GLC (Model HP5890A, Hewlett Packard) equipped with a flame-ionization detector and a capillary column (30 m × 0·25 mm inner diameter) coated with DB-210 (J&W Scientific)(Reference Liu, Sawauchi, Ogawa, Kishida and Ebihara16). The oven temperature was programmed to increase from 60 to 235°C at rate of 10°C/min and the flow rate of helium carrier gas was 1·5 ml/min. Nordeoxycholic acid (Steraloid Inc., Wilton, NH, USA) was used as the initial standard for bile acid analysis. Standard bile acids, cholic acid (CA), deoxycholic acid, 12-oxo-chenodeoxycholic acid, 12-oxo-lithocholic acid, chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA), α-muricholic acid, β-muricholic acid, ω-muricholic acid, lithocholic acid, hyodeoxycholic acid and ursodeoxycholic acid were purchased from Steraloid Inc. The levels of caecal organic acids were measured using HPLC (LC-6AL; Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) by the internal standard method(Reference Ebihara, Shiraishi and Okuma17).

RNA extraction from the liver and RT-PCR analysis of gene expression

Total RNA was extracted from frozen livers according to the method described by Chomczynski & Sacchi(Reference Chomczynski and Sacchi18). RNA integrity was verified by agarose gel electrophoresis using Oligotex-dT30 (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan). mRNA (1 μg) was used for cDNA synthesis with 10 U RT (AMV; Takara Bio) and 2 μl oligo (dT) primer (Novagen Inc., Madison, WI, USA) according to manufacturers' instruction. Messenger RNA expressions of acyl-CoA cholesterol acyltransferase 1, acyl-CoA cholesterol acyltransferase 2, apoB, cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase (CYP7A1), cholesterol 27-hydroxylase, cholesterol 12α-hydroxylase (CYP8B1), farnesoid X receptor, hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase, LDL-receptor, liver X receptor, retinoid X receptor, microsomal TAG transfer protein, sterol regulatory element-binding protein (SREBP)-1a, SREPB-1c, SREBP-2 and β-actin, as a housekeeping gene for normalization, were determined by real-time monitoring of a PCR using a Light Cycler instrument (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). cDNA (2 μl) was amplified in a total volume of 20 μl using the 2 × QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and specific primers at 0·5 m each. After initial denaturation and activation of the polymerase at 95°C for 15 min, cycling was performed for fifty cycles with annealing at the temperatures shown in Table 2 for 25 s, synthesis at 72°C for 30 s and denaturation at 94°C for 15 s. Fluorescence was measured at the end of the elongation step at 72°C. The sequences of the gene-specific primers (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) used in the study are listed in Table 2.

Table 2 Primer sequence, product size and annealing temperature

Statistical analyses

Data are expressed as means and standard deviations (n 6). Data were analysed by one-way ANOVA using the Super ANOVA statistical software package (Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA, USA), and the differences among groups were examined by Tukey's multiple range test using Super ANOVA when the F value was significant. P < 0·05 was considered significant.

Results

Experiment 1

Faecal dry weight in rats fed the AL-27 diet was significantly lower than those in rats fed other test diets. The digestibility of starch and RS in the small intestine was as follows: AL-27≫AL-54>AL-79, AL-62>AL-86>AL-76. The digestibility of starch in the small intestine decreased with increasing intakes of amylose and RS (Fig. 1; Table 3).

Fig. 1 Correlations between (a) digestibility of starch in the small intestine and amylose intake (r − 0·921, P = 0·009) and (b) digestibility of starch in the small intestine and resistant starch (RS) intake (r − 0·970, P = 0·001).

Table 3 Digestibilities of starch and resistant starch (RS) in the small intestine*

(Mean values and standard deviations)

a,b,c,d Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P < 0·05).

* For details of procedures and diets, see the Materials and methods section and Table 1. Rats were fed one of the test diets for 28 d (n 6).

(Starch intake − starch in ileorectostomy effluents)/starch intake.

(RS intake − RS in ileorectostomy effluents)/RS intake.

Experiment 2

Body weight gain in rats fed the AL-27 diet was significantly higher than that in rats fed the AL-62 diet, and tended to be higher than rats fed the AL-0, AL-54, AL-76, AL-79 and AL-86 diets (Table 4). Food intake was not affected by diet. Apparent starch digestibility was as follows: AL-0, AL-27>AL-54, AL-62, AL-79, AL-86>AL-76. Apparent starch digestibility and body weight gain decreased and tended to decrease with increasing RS intake (r − 0·795, P = 0·0327; r − 0·748, P = 0·0533). Plasma total-C concentration was the lowest in rats fed the AL-79 diet, and in rats fed the AL-62, AL-76 and AL-86 diets it was significantly lower than in rats fed AL-27. The concentration of plasma total-C decreased with increasing RS intake (r − 0·835, P = 0·0193). Plasma TAG concentrations in rats fed the AL-62 and AL-79 diets were significantly lower than those in rats fed the AL-0 and AL-27 diets, but those in rats fed the AL-54, AL-62 and AL-86 diets were not. Liver weight was as parallel as body weight gain. The concentration of liver total lipids in rats fed the AL-76 diet was significantly lower than that in rats fed the AL-27 diet, but those in rats fed the AL-54, AL-62, AL79 and AL-86 diets were not. The concentration of liver total lipids decreased with increasing RS intake (r − 0·845, P = 0·0167). The concentrations of liver total-C and TAG were not affected by diet.

Table 4 Effects of amylose contents in maize starch on body weight, body weight gain, food intake and food efficiency in ovariectomized rats*

(Mean values and standard deviations)

a,b,c,d Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P < 0·05).

* For details of procedures and diets, see the Materials and methods section and Table 1. Rats were fed one of the test diets for 28 d (n 6).

Food intake × energy value (kJ/g).

Total − HDL.

The dry weights of small intestinal content in rats fed the AL-54, AL-62 and AL-76 diets were significantly heavier than those in rats fed the AL-0 and AL-27 diets, but those in rats fed the AL-79 and AL-86 diets were not (Table 5). The dry weight of small intestinal contents exponentially increased with increasing RS intake (r 0·949, P = 0·0011). The amounts of bile acids in small intestinal contents in rats fed the AL-54, AL-62, AL-76, AL-79 and AL-86 diets were significantly higher than in rats fed the AL-0 diet, but not in rats fed the AL-27 diet. The amount of bile acids in small intestinal contents increased as the intake of RS increased (r 0·910, P = 0·0044).

Table 5 Effects of amylose content in diet on dry weight and bile acids in the small intestinal contents in ovariectomized rats*

(Mean values and standard deviations)

CA, cholic acid; CACD, chenodeoxycholic acid.

a,b,c Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P < 0·05).

* For details of procedures and diets, see the Materials and methods section and Table 1. Rats were fed one of the test diets for 28 d (n 6).

The ratios of the CA group/CDCA group in rats fed the AL-62, AL-76, AL-79 and AL-86 diets were significantly higher than those in rats fed the AL-0 and AL-27 diets.

The CA group/CDCA group ratio of bile acids in the small intestinal contents increased with increasing RS intake (r 0·840, P = 0·0180). The CA group/CDCA group ratio for bile acids in the small intestinal contents increased with increasing level of CYP8B1 mRNA (r 0·879, P = 0·0091).

The caecal wall weights in rats fed the AL-62 and AL-76 diets were significantly heavier than those in rats fed the AL-0, AL-27 and AL-86 diets (Table 6). That in rats fed the AL-79 diet was significantly heavier than those in rats fed the AL-0 and AL-86 diets. The moisture of caecal content was not affected by diet. The dry weights of caecal content in rats fed the AL-54, AL-62, AL-76, AL-79 and AL-86 diets were significantly heavier than those in rats fed the AL-0 and AL-27 diet. The amounts of bile acids in caecal content were significantly higher in rats fed the AL-54, AL-62 and AL-76 diets than in rats fed the AL-0 and AL-27 diets.

Table 6 Effects of amylose content in diet on caecal tissue weight, and dry weight, bile acids and organic acids in the caecal contents, and faecal excretion in ovariectomized rats*

(Mean values and standard deviations)

a,b,c,d Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P < 0·05).

* For details of procedures and diets, see the Materials and methods section and Table 1. Rats were fed one of the test diets for 28 d (n 6).

Acetic+propionic+butyric acids.

Faeces were collected on the last 3 d of the experimental period.

§ Coprostanol+cholesterol.

The amount of total SCFA in caecal contents increased logarithmically with increasing dry weight of caecal contents (r 0·908, P = 0·0047). The amount of succinic acid in caecal contents was higher in rats fed the AL-76 diet than in rats fed other diets. The amounts of lactic acid in caecal content in rats fed the AL-62, AL-76 and AL-79 diets were significantly higher than those in rats fed the AL-0 and AL-27 diets, but those in rats fed the AL-54 and AL-86 diets were not. The amounts of acetic acid in caecal content in rats fed the AL-54, AL-62, AL-76, AL-79 and AL-86 diets were significantly higher than those in rats fed the AL-0 and AL-27 diets, and that in rats fed the AL-76 diet was significantly higher than that in rats fed the AL-86 diet. The amounts of propionic and n-butyric acid in caecal content were significantly higher in rats fed the AL-54, AL-62, AL-76 and AL-86 diets than in rats fed the AL-0 and AL-27 diets, but was not significantly higher in rats fed the AL-79 diet than in rats fed the AL-27 diet. The amount of succinic acid+lactic acid in caecal contents exponentially increased with increasing RS intake (P = 0·0003) and the dry weight of caecal contents (r 0·997, P < 0·0001).

Dry weight of faeces extracted per day was not affected by diet. Bile acids extracted in faeces per day was as follows: AL-76, AL-79, AL-86>AL-54, AL-62>AL-0, AL-27 dietary group (Table 6). Faecal excretion of bile acids increased with increasing RS intakes (r 0·866, P = 0·0117). The amounts of coprostanol and total neutral sterol were significantly higher in rats fed the AL-62, AL-76, AL-79 and AL-86 diets than in rats fed the AL-0 and AL-27 diets, but that in rats fed the AL-54 diet was not.

The mRNA levels of farnesoid X receptor and hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase were not affected by diet (Table 7). The mRNA levels of acyl-CoA cholesterol acyltransferase 2, apoB, cholesterol 27-hydroxylase, liver X receptor, microsomal TAG transfer protein and SREBP-1a were also not affected by diet (data not shown). The mRNA level of acyl-CoA cholesterol acyltransferase 1 in rats fed the AL-0 diet was significantly higher than those in rats fed the AL-76, AL-79 and AL-86 diets. The mRNA level of CYP7A1 in rats fed the AL-65 diet was significantly higher than those in rats fed the AL-0 and AL-27 diets, but those in rats fed the AL-54, AL-62, AL-79 and AL86 diets were not. The expression of CYP7A1 mRNA increased exponentially as the intake of RS increased (r 0·811, P = 0·0267). The mRNA levels of CYP8B1 in rats fed the AL-76 and AL-79 diets were significantly higher in rats fed the AL-0 and AL-27 diets, but those in rats fed the AL-54 and AL-62 diets were not. The mRNA level of SREBP-1c in rats fed the AL-54, AL-62, AL-76 diets were significantly lower than those in rats fed the AL-0 and AL-27 diets. The mRNA level of SREBP-2 in rats fed the AL-54, AL-62, AL-76, AL-79 and AL-86 diets were significantly lower than that in rats fed the AL-27 diet, but were not significantly lower than that in rats fed the AL-0 diet.

Table 7 Effects of amylose content in diet on mRNA level of genes on cholesterol metabolism in ovariectomized rats (arbitary units)*

(Mean values and standard deviations)

a,b,c Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P < 0·05).

* For details of procedures and diets, see the Materials and methods section and Table 1. Rats were fed one of the test diets for 28 d (n 6).

For details of genes, see Table 2.

Discussion

The content of RS in test starches increased with increasing amylose content (r 0·907, P = 0·0048), which was in agreement with the result of Brown et al. (Reference Brown, McNaught, Andrews, Morita, McCleary and Prosky19). However, when amylose content further increased from 75·7 to 79·6 and 85·8 %, RS content decreased. Particle size of starch granules decreased with increasing amylose content(Reference Cheetham and Tao20, Reference Chen, Yu, Chen and Li21). Particle surface area of starch granules increase as the particle size of starch granules decrease. Digestibility of starch can be attributed to particle size and surface area(Reference Snow and O'Dea22Reference Morita, Ito, Brown, Ando and Kiriyama24). Therefore, decreased RS content of AL-79 and AL-86 compared to AL-76 would be due to the increased surface area of starch granules.

Low amylose starches are more digestible than high amylose starches(Reference Riley, Wheatley, Hassan, Ahmad, Morrison and Asemota25, Reference Lape and Treche26). The higher the amylose content of starch the greater its resistance to digestion because it forms tightly packed granules in cells. Starches with high amylose/low amylopectin content tend to be of the type-B structure, while those with low amylose/high amylopectin content are of either the type-A or intermediate type-C form(Reference Hoover27). The study on the X-ray diffraction of maize starches across a series of differing amylose contents (0–84 %) showed the changes from A to B via C with an increase in amylose content, the transition occurring at about 40 % amylose(Reference Cheetham and Tao20). Type-A and type-C starches are more digestible than type-B starches(Reference Riley, Wheatley, Hassan, Ahmad, Morrison and Asemota25, Reference El-Harith, Dickerson and Walker28). These show that the digestibility of starch in the small intestine is affected by not only particle size and surface area of starch granule but also structure of the starch.

It is well known that the deficiency of total energy intake immediately leads to the lowering of plasma cholesterol level(Reference Truswell29). In the present study, the reduction of energy intake led to the decrease of plasma total-C concentration. Therefore, the decreased concentration of plasma total-C would depend on the reduction of the energy intake. On the other hand, the following is also considered as a factor of hypocholesterolaemic effect of RS: (1) increased faecal excretion of bile acids; (2) increased biliary production of bile acids; or (3) increased synthesis of fermentation products that affect hepatic cholesterol synthesis(Reference Chen, Anderson and Jennings30). Undigested starches can bind bile acids(Reference Abadie, Hug, Kubli and Gains31). Therefore, an increased faecal excretion of bile acid through a bile acid binding by undigested starches would cause an increased hepatic synthesis of bile acid synthesis, consequently leading to the decrease of plasma total-C concentration. An increased synthesis of bile acid lowers the hepatic cholesterol pool, and this in turn leads to an up-regulation of gene expression and proteolytic activation of SREBP-2. As a consequence of this, SREBP-2 target genes like LDL-receptor and hydroxamethylglutaryl-CoA reductase would be up-regulated, however, they are not. We do not have an answer to this inconsistency now. The last factor is considered controversial, as in vivo propionate concentrations might not be high enough to decrease the activity of hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase(Reference Illman, Topping, McIntosh, Trimble, Storer, Taylor and Cheng32, Reference Beaulieu and McBurney33). In the present study, the expression of hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase mRNA was not affected by diet. In addition, there is no correlation between the amount of propionic acid in caecal content and the concentration of plasma total-C. Sacquet et al. (Reference Sacquet, Leprince and Riottot34) reported that HAMS lowered the plasma cholesterol concentration in germ-free rats. Therefore, the last factor would hardly take part in the hypocholesterolaemic effect of RS.

Several studies have shown that HAMS reduces plasma TAG concentrations in rats(Reference Morand, Levrat, Besson, Demigne and Remesy36Reference Lopez, Levrat-Verny, Coudray, Besson, Krespine, Messager, Demigne and Remesy38). A relatively low insulinaemia has been observed in rats fed HAMS(Reference Morand, Levrat, Besson, Demigne and Remesy36, Reference Byrnes, Miller and Denyer39). Feeding a diet rich in HAMS might produce a lower glycaemic response, consequently leading to declined lipogenesis in liver and adipose tissue(Reference Goda, Urakawa, Watanabe and Takase35, Reference Morand, Levrat, Besson, Demigne and Remesy36). Because newly synthesized fatty acids are preferentially channelled into VLDL, the lipogenic activity of the liver is a key factor in hepatic VLDL-TAG output(Reference Gibbons40, Reference Arbeeny, Meyers, Bergquist and Gregg41). It has been reported that propionate inhibits fatty acid synthesis(Reference Demigne, Morand, Levrat, Besson, Moundras and Remesy42, Reference Lin, Vonk, Slooff, Kuipers and Smit43) and decreases fatty acid synthetase mRNA level in cultured hepatocytes(Reference Delzenne, Daubioul, Neyrinck, Lasa and Taper44). In the present study, the concentration of plasma TAG and the amount of propionic acid in the caecal content decreased, and increased as the dietary level of RS increased (r − 0·843, P = 0·0173; r 0·853, P = 0·0146). Therefore, feeding a diet rich in RS might produce lower lipogenesis in liver and lower VLDL secretion, consequently leading to a decreased plasma TAG concentration. However, the key experimental data are lacking that allows assessment of the quantitative contributions of propionic acid to the synthesis and regulation of lipid in vivo. On the other hand, the concentration of plasma TAG is also controlled by the amount of TAG absorbed from the small intestine. The digestion of high amylose starch may be slower than low amylose starch(Reference Goda, Urakawa, Watanabe and Takase35). The slower digestion of starch rich in RS might make the digestion of TAG slow, which might result in a lower concentration of plasma TAG in rats fed a diet rich in RS.

The concentration of liver total lipids increased with increasing concentration of liver TAG (r 0·895, P = 0·0064), suggesting that the change in total liver lipids is due to the change in liver TAG. SREBP-1c plays a significant role in the nutritional regulation of hepatic fatty acid synthesis(Reference Horton, Goldstein and Brown45). There was significant positive correlation between the level of SREBP-1c mRNA and concentration of liver TAG (r − 0·832, P = 0·020). Reduced hepatic lipogenesis, as suggested by a lower hepatic gene level of SREBP-1c, may account for the lower liver lipids concentration.

Two pathways of bile acid synthesis have been identified in the rat model for hepatic bile acid synthesis: classic (neutral) and alternative (acidic). In rats, the classic pathway is the only pathway in which cholesterol is utilized in CA synthesis(Reference Rubinstein, Howard and Wrong54). CYP8B1 is required for the synthesis of CA(Reference Chiang46). The percentage of CA in bile acids in the small intestinal contents increased with increasing level of CYP8B1 mRNA (r 0·867, P = 0·0115). CDCA was a stronger suppressor of the mRNA expression of CYP7A1 than CA(Reference Hoshi, Sakata, Mikuni, Hashimoto and Kimura55, Reference Kasaoka, Morita, Ikai, Oh-hashi and Kiriyama56). Farnesoid X receptor negatively regulates bile acid production by inhibiting transcription of the CYP7A1 gene(Reference Davis, Miyake, Hui and Spann49). Farnesoid X receptor is activated by bile acids, such as CDCA(Reference Parks, Blanchard and Bledsoe50). Though the level of farnesoid X receptor mRNA was not affected by diet, faecal excretion of bile acids increased exponentially as RS intake increased (r 0·886, P = 0·0078). CDCA inhibited cholesterol synthesis(Reference Einarsson, Hillebrant and Axelson51). Therefore, the higher CA compared with CDCA in the small intestinal contents may be to promote the synthesis of bile acid in order to compensate bile acids excreted into the faeces.

The caecal tissue weight increased with increasing dry weight of caecal contents and amount of succinic acid in caecal contents (r 0·808, P = 0·0279; r 0·873, P = 0·0104). There was a positive correlation between caecal contents and caecal tissue weight in rats fed diets containing retrograded starch(Reference Verbeek, De Deckere, Tijburg, Van Amelsvoort and Beynen52). The greater pool size of succinic acid is likely to play a role in stimulating the growth of caecal tissue(Reference Morita, Kasaoka, Ohhashi, Ikai, Numasaki and Kiriyama9). Therefore, the increase in caecal contents and succinic acid pool size may contribute to the heavier caecal tissue weight.

Succinic acid and lactic acid are intermediates of global fermentation in the gut and are finally metabolized to SCFA by stable gut fermentation(Reference Macfarlane and Macfarlane53). Therefore, succinic acid and lactic acid are rarely detected in the hindgut digesta of rats under normal conditions(Reference Rubinstein, Howard and Wrong54). However, the excess accumulation of these acids has been reported in rats fed on indigestible oligosaccharide or HAMS(Reference Morita, Kasaoka, Ohhashi, Ikai, Numasaki and Kiriyama9, Reference Hoshi, Sakata, Mikuni, Hashimoto and Kimura55). The amount of succinic acid in the caecum increased as the dietary level of HAMS increased(Reference Kasaoka, Morita, Ikai, Oh-hashi and Kiriyama56). In the present study, the higher amount of succinic acid or lactic acid in caecal contents was found in rats fed the diet with the high levels of RS. Under nitrogen-limited conditions, the excess amounts of fermentable carbohydrate in the caecum should lead to production of lactic acid or succinic acid(Reference Morita, Kasaoka, Ohhashi, Ikai, Numasaki and Kiriyama9, Reference Macfarlane and Macfarlane57). Unlike SCFA, these acids are not well absorbed by the large intestine(Reference Umesaki, Yajima, Tohyama and Mutai58). Therefore, the excess accumulation of these acids in the caecum would depend on an excess production by an imbalance in carbohydrate/protein ratio of caecal content and a very slowly absorption.

Coprostanol is a metabolite of cholesterol, formed by the action of gut microflora, and its presence may indicate fermentation activity in the large intestine. The caecum is the site of vigorous microbial activity and of the microbiological reduction of cholesterol to coprostanol in the rat(Reference Kellogg59). The coprostanol/cholesterol ratio of neutral sterol in faeces decreased with increasing total amount of organic acids in caecal contents (r − 0·892, P = 0·0069). The microbial transformation of cholesterol to coprostanol has been related, so far, to only a few species, namely Eubacterium lentum and E. coprostanoligenes (Reference Eyssen, Partmentier, Compernolle, De Pauw and Piessens-Denef60, Reference Sadzikowski, Sperry and Wilkins61). Therefore, a decreased coprostanol/cholesterol ratio of neutral sterol in faeces may be due to the suppression of the multiplication of the microorganism to reduce cholesterol into coprostanol by an increased amount of total organic acids in the caecal contents.

The faecal excretion of total neutral sterol increased linearly with increasing RS intake (r 0·918, P = 0·0036). The bile flow from the liver to the intestine in rats fed the HAMS diet were significantly greater than those in rats fed the normal maize starch diet(Reference Kishida, Nogami, Ogawa and Ebihara62). Therefore, an increased faecal excretion of neutral sterol with increasing RS intake would be due to an increased bile flow.

In conclusion, the amount of RS in test starches increased with increasing amylose content in starch. Food intake was not significantly different among the groups, but the small intestinal digestibility of test starches in ileorectostomized rats decreased with increasing intakes of amylose and RS, and the concentrations of plasma TAG and total-C in ovariectomized rats decreased with increasing intakes of RS. The amount of bile acids in the small intestinal contents and the excretions of bile acids and neutral steroids in faeces increased with increasing RS intake. Starch rich in RS is less digestible and more effective in preventing ovarian hormone deficiency-induced hyperlipidaemia.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported, in part, by the Iijima Memorial Foundation. The authors wish to thank Masaru Yotsuzuka and Aaron K. Edwards (Nippon NSC Ltd, Japan) for donating starches. There is not any conflict of interest on this research. This research was supported by the research costs paid by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan and the grant of the Iijima Memorial Foundation. X. L. planned the design of the experiment, carried out the experimental plan, summarized the experimental results and discussed the experimental results with the other researchers; H. O. advised on all aspects of the experiment and discussed the experimental results; T. K. helped with all aspects of the experiment and discussed the experimental results; and K. E. discussed the design of the experimental plan and the experimental results.

References

1Gevers Leuven, JA (1994) Sex steroids and lipoprotein metabolism. Pharmacol Ther 64, 99126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Shono, N, Kumagai, S & Sasaki, H (1996) Obesity, glucose and lipid metabolism, and steroid hormones (in Japanese). J Health Sci 18, 2144.Google Scholar
3Sullivan, TR Jr, Karas, RH, Aronovitz, M, Faller, GT, Ziar, JP, Smith, JJ, O'Donnell, TF Jr & Mendelsohn, ME (1995) Estrogen inhibits the response-to-injury in a mouse carotid artery model. J Clin Invest 96, 24822488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Chen, SJ, Li, H, Durand, J, Oparil, S & Chen, YE (1996) Estrogen reduces myointimal proliferation after balloon injury of rat carotid artery. Circulation 93, 577584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5de Deckere, EA, Kloots, WJ & van Amelsvoort, JM (1993) Resistant starch decreases serum total cholesterol and triacylglycerol concentrations in rats. J Nutr 123, 21422151.Google ScholarPubMed
6de Deckere, EA, Kloots, WJ & van Amelsvoort, JM (1995) Both raw and retrograded starch decrease serum triacylglycerol concentration and fat accretion in the rat. Br J Nutr 73, 287298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Ranhotra, GS, Gelroth, JA & Leinen, SD (1997) Hypolipidemic effect of resistant starch in hamsters is not dose dependent. Nutr Res 17, 317323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Kishida, T, Nogami, H, Himeno, S & Ebihara, K (2001) Heat moisture treatment of high amylose corn starch increases its resistant starch content but not its physiologic effects in rats. J Nutr 131, 27162721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Morita, T, Kasaoka, S, Ohhashi, A, Ikai, M, Numasaki, Y & Kiriyama, S (1998) Resistant proteins alter caecal short-chain fatty acid profiles in rats fed high amylose cornstarch. J Nutr 128, 11561164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Livesey, G (1995) The impact of complex carbohydrates on energy balance. Eur J Clin Nutr 49, Suppl. 3, S89S96.Google ScholarPubMed
11Folch, J, Lees, M & Sloane Stanley, GH (1957) A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissue. J Biol Chem 226, 497509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Carr, TP, Andresen, CJ & Rudel, LL (1993) Enzymatic determination of triglyceride, free cholesterol, and total cholesterol in tissue lipid extracts. Clin Biochem 26, 3942.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Eneroth, P, Hellstrom, K & Sjovall, J (1968) A method for quantitative determination of bile acids in human feces. Acta Chem Scan 22, 17291744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Sheltaway, MJ & Losowsky, MS (1975) Determination of fecal bile acids by an enzymic method. Clin Chem Acta 64, 127132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Kishida, T, Ishikawa, H, Tsukaoka, M, Ohga, H, Ogawa, H & Ebihara, K (2003) Increase of bile acids synthesis and excretion caused by taurine administration prevents the ovariectomy-induced increase in cholesterol concentrations in the serum low-density lipoprotein fraction of Wistar rats. J Nutr Biochem 14, 716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Liu, X, Sawauchi, H, Ogawa, H, Kishida, T & Ebihara, K (2006) Retrograded tapioca starch prevents ovarian hormone deficiency-induced hypercholesterolemia. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol 52, 134141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Ebihara, K, Shiraishi, R & Okuma, K (1998) Hydroxypropyl-modified potato starch increases fecal bile acid excretion in rats. J Nutr 128, 848854.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Chomczynski, P & Sacchi, N (1987) Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate–phenol–chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem 162, 156159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Brown, IL, McNaught, KJ, Andrews, D & Morita, T (2001) Resistant starch: plant breeding, application development and commercial use. In Advanced Dietary Fibre Technology, pp. 401412 [McCleary, BV and Prosky, L, editors]. Oxford: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
20Cheetham, NWH & Tao, L (1998) Variation in crystalline type with amylose content in maize starch granules: an X-ray powder diffraction study. Carbohydr Polym 36, 277284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Chen, P, Yu, L, Chen, L & Li, X (2000) Morphology and microstructure of maize starches with different amylose/amylopectin content. Starch/Starke 58, 611615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Snow, P & O'Dea, K (1981) Factors affecting the rate of hydrolysis of starch in food. Am J Clin Nutr 34, 27212727.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Parker, R & Ring, SG (2001) Aspects of physical chemistry of starch. J Cereal Sci 34, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Morita, T, Ito, Y, Brown, IL, Ando, R & Kiriyama, S (2007) In vitro and in vivo digestibility of native maize starch granules varying in amylose contents. J AOAC Int 90, 16281634.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Riley, CK, Wheatley, AO, Hassan, I, Ahmad, MH, Morrison, EStY & Asemota, HN (2004) In vitro digestibility of raw starches extracted from five yam (Dioscrea spp.) species grown in Jamaica. Starch/Starke 56, 6973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Lape, IM & Treche, S (1994) Nutritional quality of yam (Dioscorea dumentorum and Dioscorea rotundata) flours for growing rats. J Sci Food Agric 66, 447455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27Hoover, R (2001) Composition, molecular structure, and physicochemical properties of tuber and root starches: a review. Carbohydr Polym 45, 253267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28El-Harith, EH, Dickerson, JW & Walker, R (1976) Nutritive value of various starches for the albino rat. J Sci Food Agric 27, 521526.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29Truswell, AS (1978) Energy balance and serum lipids. Naringsforskning 22, 6571.Google Scholar
30Chen, W-J, Anderson, J & Jennings, D (1984) Propionate may mediate the hypocholesterolaemic effects of certain soluble fibers in cholesterol-fed rats. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 175, 215218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31Abadie, C, Hug, M, Kubli, C & Gains, N (1994) Effect of cyclodextrins and undigested starch on the loss of chenodeoxycholate in the faeces. Biochem J 299, 725730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32Illman, RJ, Topping, DL, McIntosh, GH, Trimble, RP, Storer, GB, Taylor, MN & Cheng, BQ (1988) Hypocholesterolaemic effects of dietary propionate: studies in whole animals and perfused rat liver. Ann Nutr Metab 32, 95107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33Beaulieu, KE & McBurney, MI (1992) Changes in pig serum lipids, nutrient digestibility and sterol excretion during cecal infusion of propionate. J Nutr 122, 241245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34Sacquet, E, Leprince, C & Riottot, M (1983) Effect of amylomaize starch on cholesterol and bile acid metabolisms in germfree (axenic) and conventional (holoxenic) rats. Reprod Nutr Dev 23, 783792.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35Goda, T, Urakawa, T, Watanabe, M & Takase, S (1994) Effect of high-amylose starch on carbohydrate digestive capability and lipogenesis in epididymal adipose tissue and liver of rats. J Nutr Biochem 5, 256260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36Morand, C, Levrat, MA, Besson, C, Demigne, C & Remesy, C (1994) Effects of a diet rich in resistant starch on hepatic lipid metabolism in the rat. J Nutr Biochem 5, 138144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37Kasaoka, S, Morita, T, Ikai, M, Ohhashi, A & Kiriyama, S (1998) High-amylose cornstarch prevents increased serumlipids and body fat accretion in rats (in Japanese). J Jpn Soc Nutr Food Sci 51, 345353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38Lopez, HW, Levrat-Verny, MA, Coudray, C, Besson, C, Krespine, V, Messager, A, Demigne, C & Remesy, C (2001) Class 2 resistant starches lower plasma and liver lipids and improve mineral retention in rats. J Nutr 131, 12831289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39Byrnes, SE, Miller, JC & Denyer, GS (1995) Amylopectin starch promotes the development of insulin resistance in rats. J Nutr 125, 14301437.Google ScholarPubMed
40Gibbons, GF (1990) Assembly and secretion of hepatic very-low-density lipoprotein. Biochem J 268, 113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41Arbeeny, CM, Meyers, DS, Bergquist, KE & Gregg, RE (1992) Inhibition of fatty acid synthesis decreases very low density lipoprotein secretion in the hamster. J Lipid Res 33, 843851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42Demigne, C, Morand, C, Levrat, MA, Besson, C, Moundras, C & Remesy, C (1995) Effect of propionate on fatty acid and cholesterol synthesis and on acetate metabolism in isolated rat hepatocytes. Br J Nutr 74, 209219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43Lin, Y, Vonk, RJ, Slooff, MJ, Kuipers, F & Smit, MJ (1995) Differences in propionate-induced inhibition of cholesterol and triacylglycerol synthesis between human and rat hepatocytes in primary culture. Br J Nutr 74, 197207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44Delzenne, NM, Daubioul, C, Neyrinck, A, Lasa, M & Taper, HS (2002) Inulin and oligofructose modulate lipid metabolism in animals: review of biochemical events and future prospects. Br J Nutr 87, Suppl. 2, S255S259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45Horton, JD, Goldstein, JL & Brown, MS (2002) SREBPs: activators of the complete program of cholesterol and fatty acid synthesis in the liver. J Clin Invest 109, 11251131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46Chiang, JYL (1998) Regulation of bile acid synthesis. Frontiers Biosci 3, 176193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47Taniguchi, T, Chen, J & Cooper, AD (1994) Regulation of cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase gene expression in Hep-G2 cells. J Biol Chem 269, 1007110078.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48Ellis, E, Axelson, M, Abrahamsson, A, Eggertsen, G, Thorne, A, Nowak, G, Ericzon, BG, Bjorkhem, I & Einarsson, C (2003) Feedback regulation of bile acid synthesis in primary human hepatocytes: evidence that CDCA is the strongest inhibitor. Hepatology 38, 930938.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49Davis, RA, Miyake, JH, Hui, TY & Spann, NJ (2002) Regulation of cholesterol-7alpha-hydroxylase: BAREly missing a SHP. J Lipid Res 43, 533543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50Parks, DJ, Blanchard, SG, Bledsoe, RK, et al. (1999) Bile acids: natural ligands for an orphan nuclear receptor. Science 284, 13651368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
51Einarsson, C, Hillebrant, CG & Axelson, M (2001) Effects of treatment with deoxycholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid on the hepatic synthesis of cholesterol and bile acids in healthy subjects. Hepatology 33, 11891193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
52Verbeek, MJ, De Deckere, EA, Tijburg, LB, Van Amelsvoort, JM & Beynen, AC (1995) Influence of dietary retrograded starch on the metabolism of neutral steroids and bile acids in rats. Br J Nutr 74, 807820.Google Scholar
53Macfarlane, S & Macfarlane, GT (2003) Regulation of short-chain fatty acid production. Proc Nutr Soc 52, 367373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54Rubinstein, R, Howard, AV & Wrong, OM (1969) In vivo dialysis of faeces as a method of stool analysis. IV. The organic anion component. Clin Sci 37, 549564.Google ScholarPubMed
55Hoshi, S, Sakata, T, Mikuni, K, Hashimoto, H & Kimura, S (1994) Galactosylsucrose and xylosylfructoside alter digestive tract size and concentrations of cecal organic acids in rats fed diets containing cholesterol and cholic acid. J Nutr 124, 5260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
56Kasaoka, S, Morita, T, Ikai, M, Oh-hashi, A & Kiriyama, S (1999) Effect of high-amylose cornstarch on fecal excretion in rats (in Japanese). J Jpn Soc Nutr Food Sci 52, 263270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
57Macfarlane, GT & Macfarlane, S (1993) Factors affecting fermentation reactions in the large bowel. Proc Nutr Soc 52, 367373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
58Umesaki, Y, Yajima, T, Tohyama, K & Mutai, M (1979) Effect of organic acid absorption on bicarbonate transport in rat colon. Pflugers Arch 14, 4347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
59Kellogg, TF (1973) On the site of the microbiological reduction of cholesterol to coprostanol. Lipids 8, 658659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
60Eyssen, HJ, Partmentier, GG, Compernolle, FC, De Pauw, G & Piessens-Denef, M (1973) Biohydrogenation of sterol by Eubacterium ATCC 21,408-nova species. Eur J Biochem 36, 411421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
61Sadzikowski, MR, Sperry, JF & Wilkins, TD (1977) Cholesterol-reducing bacterium from human feces. Appl Environ Microbiol 34, 355362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
62Kishida, T, Nogami, H, Ogawa, H & Ebihara, K (2002) The hypocholesterolemic effect of high amylose cornstarch in rats is mediated by an enlarged bile acid pool and increased fecal bile acid excretion, not by cecal fermented products. J Nutr 132, 25192524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
63Reeves, PG, Nielsen, FH & Fahey, GC Jr (1993) AIN-93 purified diets for laboratory rodents: final report of the American Institute of Nutrition ad hoc writing committee on the reformulation of the AIN-76A rodent diet. J Nutr 123, 19391951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Composition of diets (g/kg)

Figure 1

Table 2 Primer sequence, product size and annealing temperature

Figure 2

Fig. 1 Correlations between (a) digestibility of starch in the small intestine and amylose intake (r − 0·921, P = 0·009) and (b) digestibility of starch in the small intestine and resistant starch (RS) intake (r − 0·970, P = 0·001).

Figure 3

Table 3 Digestibilities of starch and resistant starch (RS) in the small intestine*(Mean values and standard deviations)

Figure 4

Table 4 Effects of amylose contents in maize starch on body weight, body weight gain, food intake and food efficiency in ovariectomized rats*(Mean values and standard deviations)

Figure 5

Table 5 Effects of amylose content in diet on dry weight and bile acids in the small intestinal contents in ovariectomized rats*(Mean values and standard deviations)

Figure 6

Table 6 Effects of amylose content in diet on caecal tissue weight, and dry weight, bile acids and organic acids in the caecal contents, and faecal excretion in ovariectomized rats*(Mean values and standard deviations)

Figure 7

Table 7 Effects of amylose content in diet on mRNA level of genes on cholesterol metabolism in ovariectomized rats (arbitary units)*(Mean values and standard deviations)