The author would like to apologize for the following errors:
(i) Page 166
Currently reads as follows:
- (4)
(a) *[CP [Which Marx brother]i did [IP she say [CP [IP [a biography of ti] is going to be published/will appear this year]]]]?
(b) *[CP [Which Marx brother]i did [IP she say [CP that [IP [a biographer of ti] interviewed her/worked for her]]]]?
(Lasnik & Park 2003: 650)
- (5)
(a) [CP [Which candidate]i were [IP there [posters of ti] all over the town]]?
(b) *[CP [Which candidate]i were [IP [posters of ti] all over the town]]?
(Lasnik & Park 2003: 651)
It should be:
- (4)
(a) *[CP [Which Marx brother]i did [IP she say [CP [IP [a biography of ti] is going to be published/will appear this year]]]]?
(b) *[CP [Which Marx brother]i did [IP she say [CP that [IP [a biographer of ti] interviewed her/worked for her]]]]?
(Lasnik & Park 2003: 650, from Merchant Reference Merchant2001: 185)
- (5)
(a) [CP [Which candidate]i were [IP there [posters of ti] all over the town]]?
(b) *[CP [Which candidate]i were [IP [posters of ti] all over the town]]?
(Lasnik & Park 2003: 651, from Merchant Reference Merchant2001: 187)
(ii) Page 169, lines 10–12 below example (14)
Currently reads as follows:
This follows from what Boeckx (2003) calls the Principle of Unambiguous Chain (PUC; see also N. Richards 2001, Rizzi 2006).
It should be:
This follows from what Boeckx (2003) calls the Principle of Unambiguous Chain (PUC; see also N. Richards 2001, Rizzi 2006; cf. Müller Reference Müller1998 on the Principle of Unambiguous Binding).
- (4)