Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:56:48.001Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Accepted manuscript

QuantiVA: Quantitative Verification of Autonomous Driving

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2024

Renjue Li
Affiliation:
SKLCS, Institute of Software, CAS, Beijing, 100190, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
Tianhang Qin
Affiliation:
SKLCS, Institute of Software, CAS, Beijing, 100190, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
Pengfei Yang
Affiliation:
SKLCS, Institute of Software, CAS, Beijing, 100190, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
Cheng-Chao Huang*
Affiliation:
Nanjing Institute of Software Technology, CAS, Nanjing, 211135, China
Youcheng Sun
Affiliation:
The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
Lijun Zhang
Affiliation:
SKLCS, Institute of Software, CAS, Beijing, 100190, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
*
*Author for correspondence. Email: chengchao@njis.ac.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present a practical verification method for safety analysis of the autonomous driving system (ADS). The main idea is to build a surrogate model that quantitatively depicts the behavior of an ADS in the specified traffic scenario. The safety properties proved in the resulting surrogate model apply to the original ADS with a probabilistic guarantee. Given the complexity of a traffic scenario in autonomous driving, our approach further partitions the parameter space of a traffic scenario for the ADS into safe sub-spaces with varying levels of guarantees and unsafe sub-spaces with confirmed counter-examples. Innovatively, the partitioning is based on a branching algorithm that features explainable AI methods. We demonstrate the utility of the proposed approach by evaluating safety properties on the state-of-the-art ADS Interfuser, with a variety of simulated traffic scenarios, and we show that our approach and existing ADS testing work complement each other. We certify 5 safe scenarios from the verification results and find out 3 sneaky behavior discrepancies in Interfuser which can hardly be detected by safety testing approaches.

Type
Results
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press