Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:23:35.425Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Light in Dark Places: Later Prehistoric Mortuary Activity in Caves in Scotland and Northern England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2024

BEN HUME
Affiliation:
Independent scholar. Email: benjamin.hume10@gmail.com
IAN ARMIT
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK. Email: ian.armit@york.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Humans have utilised caves for funerary activities for millennia and their unique preservational conditions provide a wealth of evidence for treatments of the dead. This paper examines the evidence for funerary practices in the caves of Scotland and northern England from the Bronze Age to the Roman Iron Age (c. 2200 bcad 400) in the context of later prehistoric funerary ritual. Results suggest significant levels of perimortem trauma on human skeletal remains from caves relative to those from non-cave sites. We also observe a recurrent pattern of deposition involving inhumation of neonates in contrast to excarnation of older individuals.

Résumé

RÉSUMÉ

Une lumière en des lieux sombres: activité mortuaire de la fin de la Préhistoire dans les grottes d’Écosse et du Nord de l’Angleterre, par Ben Hume et Ian Armit

Les humains ont utilisé des grottes à des fins funéraires pendant des millénaires et leurs conditions de préservation uniques fournissent une abondance de données sur le traitement des morts. Cet article se penche sur les données concernant les pratiques funéraires à l’intérieur des grottes d’Écosse et du Nord de l’Angleterre entre l’âge du Bronze et l’âge du Fer Romain (c. 2200 bc–ad 400) dans le contexte des rites funéraires de la fin de la Préhistoire. Nos résultats montrent que les restes de squelettes humains provenant de grottes présentent d’importants niveaux de trauma perimortem par rapport aux squelettes provenant de sites extérieurs. Nous observons également un schéma récurrent de dépôt consistant, d’une part, en l’inhumation des nouveau-nés et, d’autre part, en l’excarnation des individus plus âgés.

Zusammenfassung

ZUSAMMENFASSUNG

Ein Licht an dunklen Orten: Bestattungsaktivitäten der jüngeren Vorgeschichte in Höhlen in Schottland und Nordengland, von Ben Hume und Ian Armit

Über Jahrtausende haben Menschen Höhlen für funerale Aktivitäten genutzt, deren einzigartige Erhaltungsbedingungen eine Fülle an Informationen zum Umgang mit den Toten liefern. In diesem Beitrag wird die Untersuchung von Belegen für Bestattungspraktiken in den Höhlen in Schottland und Nordengland von der Bronzezeit bis in die Römische Eisenzeit (ca. 2200 bcad 400) im Kontext des Bestattungsrituals der jüngeren Vorgeschichte vorgestellt. Die Ergebnisse deuten auf ein hohes Maß an perimortalen Traumata an menschlichen Skelettteilen aus Höhlen im Vergleich zu jenen von anderen Fundorten. Wir beobachten außerdem ein wiederkehrendes Deponierungsmuster, das Körperbestattungen von Neonaten im Gegensatz zur Entfleischung älterer Individuen umfasst

Resumen

RESUMEN

Una luz en la oscuridad: la actividad funeraria en cuevas durante la Prehistoria reciente en Escocia y el norte de Inglaterra, por Ben Hume e Ian Armit

Los seres humanos han utilizado las cuevas para desarrollar actividades funerarias durante milenios y sus condiciones únicas de preservación proporcionan una evidencia de gran riqueza en los aspectos relacionados con los tratamientos de los muertos. Este artículo examina la evidencia de prácticas funerarias en cuevas de Escocia y el norte de Inglaterra desde la Edad del Bronce hasta la Edad del Hierro y época romana (c. 2200 bc–ad 400) en el contexto de los rituales funerarios de la Prehistoria reciente. Los resultados sugieren niveles significantes de traumas perimorten en restos esqueléticos humanos procedentes de las cuevas en relación con aquellos procedentes de yacimientos que no son cuevas. De la misma manera, se observa un patrón recurrente de deposición que implica la inhumación de neonatos en contraste con el descarnado de individuos de mayor edad.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Prehistoric Society

The use of caves for funerary activities extends back for tens of thousands of years. Indeed, the earliest known human burials have been found within cave environments (eg, Martinón-Torres et al. Reference Martinón-Torres, d’Errico, Santos, Álvaro Gallo, Amano and Archer2021). The unique preservational conditions within caves can, in many cases, provide a wealth of evidence for past funerary treatments. This paper examines human remains recovered from cave sites in Scotland and northern England that have been dated via radiocarbon dating or material culture from the start of the Bronze Age c. 2200 bc (Bradley Reference Bradley2019, 156) to the end of the Roman Iron Age/Romano-British period, c. ad 400 (Armit et al. Reference Armit, Dunwell and Hunter2002, 4). It is based on a comprehensive literature search of published sources and databases including the National Record of the Historic Environment in Scotland (Canmore 2022) and the Gazetteer of Caves, Fissures and Rock Shelters in Britain Containing Human Remains (Chamberlain Reference Chamberlain2021). It aims to identify the nature and range of funerary treatments carried out within caves and to situate these within the context of broader developments in funerary practice over the period.

The last decade has seen a significant growth of research into the human use of caves. Recent edited volumes considering the significance of ritual and sacrality in acts performed within caves across the globe (Moyes Reference Moyes2012; Dowd and Hensey Reference Dowd and Hensey2016; Büster et al. Reference Büster, Warmenbol and Mlekuž2019) have been complemented by a wealth of regional and period-based studies (eg, Bergsvik & Skeates Reference Bergsvik and Skeates2012; Wilford Reference Wilford2016; Bergsvik & Dowd Reference Bergsvik and Dowd2017; Peterson Reference Peterson2019a). At the site specific level, the processes involved with death and funerary activity in caves have been considered in depth at sites including the Sculptor’s Cave, north-east Scotland (Armit et al. Reference Armit, Schulting, Knüsel and Shepherd2011; Armit & Büster Reference Armit and Büster2020) and Scaloria Cave, south-east Italy (Elster et al. Reference Elster, Isetti, Robb and Traverso2016). Other studies have focused on the role of material culture in cave use (Dowd Reference Dowd2016) and the influence of cave morphology on the structuring of human experience (eg, Delannoy et al. Reference Delannoy, David, Freslov, Mullet, Green, Berthet, Petchey, Arnold, Wood, McDowell, Crouch, Mialanes, Ash and Wong2020).

Recent work focusing on the theme of liminality has offered insights into the role of caves both as agents and as settings for ritual activity (eg, Büster et al. Reference Büster, Warmenbol and Mlekuž2019). For example, sea caves can be revealed and then disappear at different times of the day, as well as being cut off and isolated from the land with the tides (eg, Armit & Büster Reference Armit and Büster2020); the transient nature of sound in a cave can also influence the way that it is experienced. Furthermore, the coastal edge itself constitutes the threshold between land and water, with this relationship being renegotiated daily according to the tides (Meethan Reference Meethan, Andrews and Roberts2012, 70). The kinetic rhythms of the seascape and the ever-fluid cave morphology create a dynamic and transient environment (Edensor Reference Edensor2010, 69), as well as a consistently liminal state that must be considered in terms of its changeability as a factor in its use by humans.

The Sculptor’s Cave (Fig. 1), as a sea cave cut off at high tide and hard to access by either land or sea, is a prime example of a liminal place that exists in the hinterland between land and sea where funerary activity was embodied within multiple layers of liminality (Armit & Büster Reference Armit and Büster2020, 247). The significance of water can also be clearly seen at Han-sur-Lesse in Belgium, where votive bronze discs were deposited in the waters of the cave (Dalaere & Warmenbol Reference Dalaere and Warmenbol2019, 143); this is also the case for when human remains have been deposited in rivers (Parker Pearson Reference Parker Pearson, Bradbury and Scarre2017, 130). The agency and materiality of caves is also significant, as with the Neolithic human remains deposited within active tufa formations in the cave of HA 3 near Settle in Yorkshire (Leach Reference Leach2006, 160); this evidences an active funerary rite within a liminal context that continues after the departure of the mourners (Peterson Reference Peterson2019a, 30).

Fig. 1. The Sculptor’s Cave, Moray, Scotland (courtesy of the Sculptor’s Cave Archive)

Whether caves were created through the hydraulic action of the sea (DECC 2021) or through fluvial motion dissolving the rock (Gillieson Reference Gillieson2021, 1), they provide a liminal location where the surface meets the underworld as well as one where water is constantly transitioning from one place to another. The constant changeability of these environments echoes that of shallow pools used for votive deposition, that may develop into peat bogs over millennia whilst retaining their ritual associations (Bradley Reference Bradley2000, 154). The deposition of objects and possible sacrificial human victims in such locations across northern Europe reflects their role as liminal locations where contact can be made with chthonic deities (Cunliffe Reference Cunliffe2018, 284; Giles Reference Giles2020, 211).

The nature of the cave, with its unique juxtaposition of above and below ground aspects, is significant when considering the funerary rituals that occurred within; these marginal locations frequently become foci for human funerary activity and the votive deposition of offerings (Chamberlain Reference Chamberlain2012, 82). The role of caves in the transition from life to death is also evident cross-culturally, for example in ancient Greek mythology where a visit to the cave of Trophonius would allow for communication with Hades who embodies the underworld (Ustinova Reference Ustinova2013, 121). Similar practices are seen in Central America during the Post-Classical Mayan period where myths tell of caves being used as gateways to a spiritual realm inhabited by supernatural beings (Pugh Reference Pugh, Prufer and Brady2005, 50). This ritual aspect of cave use certainly presents a strong case to suggest that caves were inherently transitional and liminal locations that could be utilised for funerary activity to ensure that the dead received the necessary rites.

SOURCES & LIMITATIONS

Many of the sites considered in this paper were excavated and published in antiquarian sources from the 18th to early 20th centuries, before the development of modern recovery techniques. Research into cave archaeology and human remains in this period was generally focused on rather descriptive ‘when’ and ‘where’ questions, which significantly limited the development of the more interpretive ‘why’ and ‘how’ questions (Bersgvik & Skeates Reference Bergsvik and Skeates2012, 2). This inevitable reliance on antiquarian sources introduces two sets of problems. First, theoretical and methodological issues in the ways that early excavators analysed and described data and, secondly, the practical methods with which they excavated.

Late 19th and early 20th century culture historical studies were closely intertwined with problematic issues in the early development of osteoarchaeology, for example the use of craniometrics to establish a notional distinction between different ‘races’ and ‘ethnicities’ (Morse Reference Morse1999, 1; Manias Reference Manias2013, 116–17; Stout Reference Stout, Tarlow and Nilsson Stutz2013, 19). Scientific racism sought to effectively sort individuals by the measurements of their skull into different categories of humanity (Douglas Reference Douglas, Douglas and Ballard2008, 33), in much the same way that artefacts were categorised. In reporting the early excavations at the Sculptor’s Cave, for example, it was noted that the human remains were ‘so fragmentary and mixed that it is not possible to observe any characteristics of racial significance’ (Benton Reference Benton1931, 207). Osteological analysis of individuals from the Obanian caves in western Scotland also suggested that certain physiological changes to the femora were associated ‘with the squatting attitude, a position which, as is well known, many savages assume when resting’ (Turner Reference Turner1895, 416). The use of terms such as ‘savages’ directly reflects the social and political attitudes of the time, embedded with colonial motives and perspectives (eg, Childe Reference Childe1925, 207).

From a purely practical point of view, the limited focus of early osteological study led to the discard of large quantities of human remains that would otherwise form a hugely valuable resource for modern study. At the Sculptor’s Cave, for example, the original excavator, Sylvia Benton, noted during excavations in 1930 that ‘I am keeping all skulls and leg-bones … You will be glad to hear that the rest goes into the dump’ (private correspondence cited in Armit & Büster Reference Armit and Büster2020, 180). Similar histories of discard and neglect have affected a substantial proportion of such assemblages.

The problematic legacy of antiquarian methods is exemplified by the 1838 excavation of Victoria Cave in north-east England (Dearne & Lord Reference Dearne and Lord1998, 16). Although providing early evidence of Romano-British cave activity, the use of dynamite to clear areas of the cave will also have caused massive destruction to archaeological deposits (Dearne & Lord Reference Dearne and Lord1998, 21). ‘MacKie’s patent cotton gunpowder’ was similarly used to facilitate the removal of archaeological deposits within Borness Cave in south-west Scotland (Clarke Reference Clarke1878, 306). These were not especially aberrant occurrences: in a publication from 1884, the use of dynamite for excavation is likened to the use of the spade ‘when applied with sagacity and means’ (Merriam Reference Merriam1884, 8). Even where such extreme measures were not deployed, however, we must bear in mind the limited and relatively crude recovery techniques of the period, which will have been made especially difficult given the dark and cramped nature of cave environments.

Despite their relative crudity and often problematic colonial agendas, antiquarian and culture historical sources nonetheless remain invaluable for the analysis of funerary practices within caves, not least because around 66% of individuals reported here were excavated before 1960. This essential dataset thus requires careful critical examination.

As well as being an archaeological resource, caves have also long intrigued researchers in other disciplines such as geology, biology, and, of course, speleology (eg, Culver & Pipan Reference Culver and Pipan2019; Gillieson Reference Gillieson2021). Inevitably, reports written from the perspective of these disciplines may not always focus on recording human remains or contextual archaeological data accurately. Speleological analysis of High Pasture Cave, Skye, by the British Cave Research Association for example, focused on the geological features with only passing mention of a scattering of calcited human bones on the floor of the cave (Ryder Reference Ryder1974, 121); this site, as we now know, contained an exceptional funerary assemblage, revealed by subsequent archaeological investigations (Dulias et al. Reference Dulias, Birch, Wilson, Justeau, Gandini, Flaquer, Soares, Richards, Pala and Edwards2019; Birch & McKenzie Reference Birch and Mackenzieforthcoming). This can be problematic from an archaeological perspective as essential contextual information may often be missing. Furthermore, non-archaeological cave activity can frequently disrupt deposits, causing disturbances to the complex stratigraphy and compromising later archaeological recording. On the other hand, speleological investigation by professionals and caving enthusiasts provides a novel opportunity and resource for archaeologists to research remains which otherwise may not have been discovered.

METHODS

The dataset considered here is gathered from published and unpublished sources relating to the funerary use of cave sites in northern England and Scotland, dating from the start of the Bronze Age (c. 2200 bc) to the end of the Roman Iron Age/Romano-British Period (c. ad 400); re-analysis of the human remains was beyond the scope of this research. The dataset comprises 200 individuals (Fig. 2) from 42 sites (Fig. 3) that have been converted into the following comparable age categories (Falys & Lewis Reference Falys and Lewis2011): foetus: 40 weeks in utero; neonate: around the time of birth; infant: birth–11 months; juvenile: 1–12 years; adolescent: 13–17 years; young adult: 18–25 years; young middle adult: 26–35 years; old middle adult: 36–45 years; mature adult: 46+ years; adult: over 18 years but exact age unknown; and unknown age: age was not possible to determine. The biological age of an individual has been used for ageing; the social ages of individuals are considered within the context of their biological age (see Halcrow & Tayles Reference Halcrow and Tayles2008). The sexing of individuals has been limited to adults unless otherwise specified, for example, where DNA analysis has been undertaken. In some earlier studies, where the methods used for sexing are unclear, we have taken the interpretation as correct unless further evidence has contradicted the original analysis.

Fig. 2. Locations of the 200 identified individuals from our dataset

Fig. 3. Locations of the 42 cave sites within our dataset. Some points overlap, indicating the close proximity of certain sites (map kindly produced by Helen Goodchild)

In standardising the terminology from earlier reports we have utilised the following definitions: trauma in the skeleton can been defined as injuries such as fracture, dislocation, post-traumatic deformity, or miscellaneous traumatic conditions that cause partial or complete discontinuity of the bone (Redfern & Roberts Reference Redfern, Roberts and Buikstra2019, 211); these can then be further broken down to consider the cause of trauma, as well as when it occurred. Perimortem trauma can be defined as a traumatic event that occurred at or around the time of death which lacks any evidence of healing or remodelling (Ubelaker Reference Ubelaker, McSweeney and Gerdau-Radonić2015, 95). Sharp force trauma is defined as an injury created by an implement with at least one sharp edge that produces a lesion with an elliptical or straight fracture, a well-defined clean edge, or an irregular cut with a flaking, roughened appearance (Redfern & Roberts Reference Redfern, Roberts and Buikstra2019, 220). Blunt force trauma can be considered as an injury resulting from the impact on the skeleton of a blunt object or the impact of the skeleton on a blunt surface (Wedel & Galloway Reference Wedel, Galloway, Wedel and Galloway2013). Intentional violence covers a wide range of actions that are deliberately inflicted on an individual. These can vary across many actions that cause injury, mortality, or morbidity (Redfern Reference Redfern2016, 128). Disarticulated bone assemblages represent human remains that have become mixed through accidental disturbance or that have been manipulated for ritual or cultural purposes (Brickley & McKinley Reference Brickley and McKinley2004, 14). Cremation refers to individuals that have been subjected to burning for practical disposal or ritualised reasons and inhumation refers to individuals who have been intentionally deposited within a grave.

Various methods have been used within the dataset to categorise the form of trauma present on the human remains, ranging from SEM to light microscopic and macroscopic analysis. Chronological attribution is based on radiocarbon dating, where available, or associated material culture. The dataset has been broken down into three geographical regions: Scotland, north-east England (including Yorkshire) and north-west England. Appendix S1 lists all individuals, including radiocarbon dating information where available. Appendix S2 provides information on each site. Each site has been assigned a unique catalogue number that appears in brackets in the text to enable cross-referencing with the appendices.

FUNERARY EVIDENCE FROM CAVES

Scotland

Funerary activity from the Bronze Age to the Roman Iron Age is definitively attested within 15 caves in Scotland with evidence for inhumation, cremation, and the presence of disarticulated human remains (Table 1). All three funerary treatments are represented in the Bronze Age, whereas Iron Age and Roman Iron Age activity comprises exclusively disarticulation and inhumation. Evidence for perimortem trauma is present, as is the predominance of Roman Iron Age burial manifesting through the inhumation of neonates and infants rather than adults, with the exception of the adult female from High Pasture Cave (2). Within the Scottish dataset there is an overwhelming dominance of disarticulated human remains through all time periods although these could derive, in some cases, from whole bodies that have subsequently disarticulated in situ.

Table 1. All sites in scotland

Dis. = disarticulated; Inh. = inhumation; Crem = cremation; BA = Bronze Age; IA = Iron Age; RIA = Roman Iron Age; MNI = minimum number of individuals; Neo. = neonate; Inf. = infant; Juv. = juvenile; Adol. = adolescent; Ad. = adult; YA = young adult; YMA = young middle adult; OMA = older middle adult; U = unknown; F = female; M = male

Bronze Age c. 2200–800 bc : The region of Moray in north-east Scotland provides significant evidence of disarticulated human remains deposited within a chain of sea caves that form part of a coastal funerary landscape close to Covesea, on the Moray Firth. The Sculptor’s Cave (7) was used from the Late Bronze Age to the Roman Iron Age with a strong focus on funerary and ritualised activity (Armit & Büster Reference Armit and Büster2020). This can be seen through a distinct phase of funerary activity which contains the remains of several Late Bronze Age juveniles with evidence of curation, perhaps deposited as mummy bundles. Further evidence of ritualistic activity comes from votive offerings, including gold-covered hair-rings found deposited within the cave, some in association with the human remains. The nearby Covesea Cave 2 (6) contains the disarticulated remains of at least ten individuals, including genetically male and female individuals (based on aDNA analysis) that have been AMS dated to the Late Bronze Age (Sheridan et al. Reference Sheridan, Armit, Reich, Booth, Bernados and Barnes2019). Some of these remains show evidence of cutmarks and some (as at the Sculptor’s Cave) are associated with alignments of stakes in the cave floor which could suggest the laying out and processing of bodies (Büster Reference Büster2014). An individual from Covesea Cave 1 (5) has been AMS dated to the Early Bronze Age: 2278–2027 cal bc (3731±36 bp, SUERC-61925). Both the Sculptor’s Cave and Covesea Cave 2 provide evidence of perimortem trauma which may have been caused either by intentional violence or by the processing of human remains to aid in disarticulation such, as the perimortem trauma to the mandibles of one infant and three juveniles.

The closest parallel for the activity in the Covesea Caves comes from Borness Cave (14) in Kirkcudbrightshire, south-west Scotland (Clarke Reference Clarke1876; Reference Clarke1878), where one of two infant crania has yielded an AMS date of 1006–844 cal bc (2784±30 bp, SUERC-61320; Sheridan et al. Reference Sheridan, Armit, Reich, Booth, Bernados and Barnes2019). The bones of two infants excavated from St Baldred’s Cave, East Lothian (12) are undated, but their context and association with later prehistoric pottery plausibly puts them into the same broad period (Laynard Reference Layard1934). Further disarticulated human remains have been uncovered at Gasworks Cave (9) and Sand 1 Rock Shelter (3) with a cremation found at Glennan (10).

Iron Age c. 800 bc ad 43: Evidence for funerary practices in Scottish caves in the Iron Age can be seen through two sites, both on the west coast. High Pasture Cave (2) in Skye, contains five disarticulated individuals from this period, while MacArthur Cave (11), Oban, contains the remains of four possible individual inhumations (though the records are such that it is possible that they may actually have been disarticulated when found) with radiocarbon determinations dating throughout the Iron Age (Saville & Hallén Reference Saville and Hallén1994).

Roman Iron Age c. ad 43–400: The Sculptor’s Cave evidences a second phase of funerary activity in the Roman Iron Age and provides compelling evidence to suggest intentional decapitation within the cave of at least nine individuals, as well as funerary evidence from the same broad period (Armit & Büster Reference Armit and Büster2020). There is also strong evidence of funerary activity during the Roman Iron Age in Skye, of which the remains of six individuals from High Pasture Cave (2) fall into two main groups. The first is evidenced through disarticulated remains which may have been brought to the cave in that condition or excarnated within it before the removal of certain skeletal elements. The second group comprises the burial of an adult female under stones that may have been used to crush her to death or to weigh down her corpse deliberately and is associated with the burial of several neonates and infants (Armit Reference Armit2022); further research could possibly shed more light on the exact circumstances (see Osterholtz et al. Reference Osterholtz, Swantek, Siver and Davis2021): this apparently deviant inhumation could suggest a specific rite associated with traumatic death. At the rock shelter of Fiskavaig (1), also in Skye, a cranial fragment was discovered, belonging to a Roman Iron Age individual. This is particularly interesting as the cranial fragment has a circular hole drilled (post-mortem) through the centre (Birch Reference Birch2009). One hypothesis for the perforation was for its suspension as an ornament or as part of a larger decorative piece worn either on the person or displayed in the home and could reflect practices associated with either ancestor veneration or trophy-taking (Shapland & Armit Reference Shapland and Armit2012, 106). There is thus strong evidence of a funerary tradition associated with caves in Skye, from the Iron Age into the Roman Iron Age. A further, worked, human tibia of unknown sex or age was also recovered from Torrs Cave in Dumfries & Galloway (15). Furthermore, several Scottish caves have yielded human remains in probable association with Roman Iron Age objects, as with two caves at Archerfield (13), East Lothian (Cree Reference Cree1909) and one at Rhodes Links Cave (4), North Berwick (Richardson Reference Richardson1907), the latter apparently yielding the bones of one or more juveniles.

North-east England

Funerary activity is represented in 20 caves in the north-east of England including evidence for cremation, disarticulation, and inhumation (Table 2). As in Scotland, Bronze Age sites evidence all three forms of funerary practice whereas Iron Age and Romano-British sites are only represented through disarticulated human remains and inhumation. As with the Scottish sites, there is evidence for perimortem trauma as well as neonate inhumations present at Carsington Pasture Cave (29), Derbyshire. Conversely, individuals buried at Bishop Middleham Quarries (18) were all adults and deposited in a crouched position beneath large, flat stones.

Table 2. All sites in north-east england

Dis. = disarticulated; Inh. = inhumation; Crem = cremation; BA = Bronze Age; IA = Iron Age; RIA = Roman Iron Age; MNI = minimum number of individuals; Neo. = neonate; Inf. = infant; Juv. = juvenile; Adol. = adolescent; Ad. = adult; YA = young adult; YMA = young middle adult; OMA = older middle adult; U = unknown; F = female; M = male

Bronze Age c. 2200–800 bc : Raven Scar Cave (24) in the Yorkshire Dales has produced disarticulated remains of at least 15 individuals, including ten juveniles. AMS dates suggest deposition of these remains in the 10th century bc (Leach Reference Leach2006, 103, 113), contemporary with the similar funerary activity in the Covesea Caves (5, 6). Carsington Pasture Cave (29) presents a wealth of funerary activity that spans from the Neolithic to the Iron Age across three near-vertical chambers and contains one individual dating to 1918–1750 cal bc (3515±20 bc, PSUAMS-8288; Booth Reference Booth2022).

In Yorkshire there is strong evidence to suggest perimortem trauma. Antofts Windypit (20) contains two main chambers which have a focus on funerary activity. Chamber 3 contained three individuals scattered amongst boulders with animal remains and Beaker pottery, although these individuals have now been AMS dated to the Middle Bronze Age (Leach Reference Leach2006, 272). Pin Hole Cave (33) also contained evidence for the inhumation of a juvenile and an adult.

Iron Age c. 800 bc ad 43: At Carsington Pasture Cave (29), there appears to be an area primarily reserved for the deposition of neonates that have been directly AMS dated to the Iron Age c. 770–400 cal bc (Booth Reference Booth2022, 2). Across the rest of the cave were many disarticulated adult human remains also dating to the Iron Age, which sharply contrasts with the inhumed neonates. This pattern is also evident at Dog Hole Cave (37) in Cumbria and High Pasture Cave (2) on Skye which also date to the Iron Age or Roman Iron Age. Chamber 2 at Antofts Windypit (20) is mostly dominated by disarticulated adult human remains that also have evidence of perimortem defleshing and traumatic lesions. AMS and typological dating of associated pottery have dated these remains to the Iron Age 760–390 cal bc (Leach Reference Leach2006, 272). Further disarticulated human remains were present at Bishop Middleham Quarries (18), Heights Lane Grike (22), North End Pot (23), Langwith Cave (31), and Mother Grundy’s Parlour (32).

Romano-British c. ad 43–400: As at Antofts Windypit (20), Buckland’s Windypit (21) contained the remains of six disarticulated Romano-British individuals of which at least four show evidence of perimortem blunt force trauma to the cranium (Leach Reference Leach2006, 308). At least one young adult and an adult, both disarticulated, from Slip Gill Windypit (26) have been AMS dated to the Late Iron Age–early Romano-British period and exhibit evidence of perimortem trauma, including one potential decapitation (Leach Reference Leach2006, 243) Further evidence of disarticulated human remains can be seen at the sites of Bull Pit (28), Frank i’ th’ Rocks Cave (30), Poole’s Cavern (34), and Robin Hood’s Cave (35).

North-west England

North-west England contains fewer excavated cave sites than the other two regions, due presumably to differences in geology and histories of antiquarian exploration (Table 3). It nonetheless contains six sites with evidence of later prehistoric funerary activity. As with Scotland and north-east England, three methods of deposition – cremation, disarticulation, and inhumation – are in evidence.

Table 3. All sites in north-west england

Dis. = disarticulated; Inh. = inhumation; Crem = cremation; BA = Bronze Age; IA = Iron Age; RIA = Roman Iron Age; MNI = minimum number of individuals; Neo. = neonate; Inf. = infant; Juv. = juvenile; Adol. = adolescent; Ad. = adult; YA = young adult; YMA = young middle adult; OMA = older middle adult; U = unknown; F = female; M = male

Bronze Age c. 2200–800 bc : Individuals dating to the Bronze Age were represented at four sites through disarticulation and cremation. An example of disarticulation comes from the three individuals from Heaning Wood Bone Cave (38) in Cumbria whose remains may have been discarded in a crevice leading to the cave below and likely date to the Early Bronze Age (Barnes Reference Barnes1970). This contrasts with the urned cremations of adults at Fairy Holes (40) in Lancashire and Carden Park Rock Shelter (42) in Cheshire.

Iron Age c. 800 bc ad 43: There is an apparent lack of individuals dating to the Iron Age from caves in the north-west of England (see ARCHI 2023). This may reflect a genuine lack of Iron Age funerary activity, preservation biases, or the relatively limited history of research relative to caves in the other two regions.

Romano-British c. ad 43–400: Romano-British inhumations in this region are dominated by neonates and foetuses from the site of Dog Hole Cave (37), Cumbria, which also contained evidence of disarticulated human remains. Two distinct phases were detected at this site with the first being a foetus and four neonates buried with a horse and a dog. All the human remains from Phase 2 were juvenile or older and were, instead, associated with the heads and feet of cattle as well as the remains of dogs (O’Regan et al. Reference O’Regan, Bland, Evans, Holmes, McLeod, Philpott, Smith, Thorp and Wilkinson2020, 87). One context from the cave has been described as potentially being a ‘ritual pit’ on account of the large quantities of copper alloy, iron, and stone objects found therein (Branigan & Dearne Reference Branigan and Dearne1991, 79). Rawthey Cave (39) in Cumbria and Dunald Mill Hole (41) in Cheshire contained disarticulated human remains, although the latter may have been deposited through fluvial systems within the cave.

DISCUSSION

Evidence for excarnation

One of the most striking features of the corpus considered here is the dominance of disarticulated human remains (Fig. 4), which is common across all periods and regions in our data and is also found in other contemporary contexts such as settlement sites, ramparts, pits, and boundary ditches (Carr & Knüsel Reference Carr, Knüsel, Gwilt and Haslegrove1997, 167). In many cases this most likely results from excarnation of the dead, where rites of separation and transition occur through physical and emotional changes to both the deceased and the mourners through manipulation of the remains to aid in the transition from life to death (Weiss-Krejci Reference Weiss-Krejci, Tarlow and Nilsson Stutz2013, 283). This sharply contrasts with inhumations where it is most likely that the individual was deposited as a fleshed corpse. This is evident, for example, at Frank i’ th’ Rocks Cave (30) in Derbyshire, where a lack of long bones and adult skulls provides strong evidence to suggest that these elements were preferentially removed after a period of excarnation (Palmer & Lee Reference Palmer and Lee1928, 246); there were, however, some fragmentary juvenile jaws, teeth, skulls, vertebrae, and clavicles. It is important to note that this site was excavated by speleologists rather than archaeologists which can certainly influence the interpretation of the site in relation to their specific research questions. A strikingly similar pattern has been found among the broadly contemporary Roman Iron Age funerary remains from the Sculptor’s Cave, Moray (7) (Armit & Büster Reference Armit and Büster2020). Therefore, actions that have previously been considered simply as ‘ritual practice’, such as the removal of skeletal elements, most likely had a more grounded application for the practitioners in order to physically manipulate the funerary process and the transition of the individual to their afterlife (Brück Reference Brück1999, 314); the duality of incorporeal and physical movement evidences the active transition.

Fig. 4. The quantity of funerary practices from all periods and regions of study. BA: Bronze Age; IA: Iron Age; RIA: Roman Iron Age

Excarnation appears to have been a dominant funerary practice across Britain more generally in the later prehistoric period and could explain why isolated human remains frequently appear in settlement contexts due to secondary burial or curation, where the remains are moved after defleshing has concluded (Carr & Knüsel Reference Carr, Knüsel, Gwilt and Haslegrove1997, 167; Cunliffe Reference Cunliffe2018, 308). At the Iron Age hillfort of Maiden Castle in Dorset, for example, secondary burial occurred after defleshing, as indicated by cutmarks, dry fractures, and canid gnaw marks (Redfern Reference Redfern2008, 293); this presents a strong case to suggest that the remains were processed and then left above ground for some time before being deposited. Although often equated with exposure burial, where the corpse is left in the open to decay through natural means, excarnation encompasses a wider range of practices by which flesh might be removed from the bones by either natural or artificial means. In Iron Age Wessex, for example, the lack of gnawing and weathering exhibited on human bones suggests that excarnation in this region was a closely managed process (Madgwick Reference Madgwick, Davis, Sharples and Waddington2008, 107), perhaps conducted in covered environments such as mortuary houses. Protected excarnation can be seen in our dataset, for example at Ash Tree Cave (27) in Derbyshire, where disarticulated human remains were carefully covered by stones in order to protect and preserve them (Armstrong Reference Armstrong1956, 57). In this context it appears that, in regions where the geology allowed, caves could be used as sites of protected excarnation where the dead might be allowed to decay under controlled conditions, where they might be revisited from time to time, and where human interventions may take the form of re-arrangement or removal of certain bones or body parts; the process of disarticulation can therefore be a direct result of excarnation.

Funerary treatments & demography

One of the most striking patterns to emerge from the analysis is the different funerary practices afforded to neonates and adults. Carsington Pasture Cave (29) in Derbyshire, High Pasture Cave (2) in Skye, and Dog Hole Cave (37) in Cumbria all evidence inhumation of foetuses and neonates whereas adults are predominantly disarticulated (apart from a female young middle adult buried under rocks at High Pasture Cave). Figure 5 demonstrates the comparison of inhumations and disarticulated individuals at these three sites. This trend is interesting as the inhumations at Carsington Pasture Cave have been dated to the Iron Age whereas the other sites all date to the Roman Iron Age/Romano-British period. This could imply some continuity of practice surrounding the specific circumstances of neonatal and foetal death. Saint Baldred’s Cave (12) in East Lothian also has evidence of infant inhumations, however these are poorly dated and not apparently accompanied by adult disarticulation.

Fig. 5. Numbers of disarticulated individuals & inhumations from High Pasture Cave, Skye (2), Dog Hole Cave, Cumbria (37), & Carsington Pasture Cave, Derbyshire (29)

A similar disjunction in funerary treatments can be seen elsewhere in later prehistoric Britain. In Atlantic Scotland, for example, the Iron Age site of the Knowe of Skea, Orkney, contains numerous infant inhumations placed within rubble mounds with a clear attempt to retain skeletal articulation despite intercutting burials (Gooney Reference Gooney2015, 234). This contrasts with a broader picture of excarnation/disarticulation for adult human remains in the region (eg, Tucker Reference Tucker2010). This demonstrates the significance of preserving the integrity of the infant in contrast with older individuals and reverses the focus of the rite depending on their age.

Evidence of infant inhumation is widely present at non-cave sites in East Yorkshire such as at the Romano-British site at Shiptonthorpe, where 22 infants were buried together and date from the 2nd–4th centuries ad (Millett & Gowland Reference Millett and Gowland2015, 174); this may suggest that this element of Iron Age funerary ritual persisted over time even when other aspects were lost (Harding Reference Harding2016, 290). It is worth noting, however, that funerary practices at villa sites can vary from rural and urban sites although aspects of continuity can still be seen.

If excarnation allowed an individual to transition into the wider community of ancestors (Harding Reference Harding2016, 277) then articulated inhumation could represent an attempt to stop such re-integration and regeneration. For neonates and young infants, this may reflect a societal attitude that they had not yet achieved the status of persons and, therefore, there was a requirement for an alternative method of disposal. For the few adults receiving this treatment, however, the reasons are likely to be different. This is particularly significant, for example, when considering the traumatic death of the female adult from High Pasture Cave (2), Skye, who seems to have been crushed beneath rocks and buried with several neonates.

Perimortem trauma

A further outcome of our analysis is the prevalence of perimortem trauma, which manifests in our dataset predominantly in the form of cutmarks and violently inflicted lesions on human skeletal remains (Fig. 6). Evidence for this can have varying aetiologies and it can sometimes be difficult to establish the motive. For example, perimortem trauma can occur during an episode of violence shortly before death (Roberts Reference Roberts2009, 178) or during the initial funerary process as a means to process and/or display either a revered ancestor or a despised enemy (Armit & Ginn Reference Armit and Ginn2007, 130; Armit Reference Armit, Fagan, Fibiger and Trundle2020, 453). This distinction is significant as it is important to assess, where possible, how violence may have affected individuals from within the community versus those who were perceived as outsiders (Duncan Reference Duncan, Martin, Harrod and Perez2012, 252). Of the 200 individuals in our dataset, at least 27 (13.5%) showed some evidence of perimortem trauma. This is not only a remarkably high percentage but it is also likely to be a significant under-estimation due to the highly fragmentary and incomplete nature of many of the human remains and the fact that many violent actions leave no physical trace on the skeleton. Furthermore, the use of modern scientific techniques for examining perimortem trauma could also increase this percentage if some of the remains from the older publications were subjected to re-analysis.

Fig. 6. Evidence of sharp force trauma inflicted by a sword to the left vertebral arch of an individual from the Sculptor’s Cave: A: superior view; B: closer detail of trauma (courtesy of Rick Schulting)

In Scotland, the prime examples of skeletal trauma come from the Sculptor’s Cave (7) and Covesea 2 (6) in Moray where violence and funerary defleshing are evidenced on multiple individuals dating from both the Late Bronze Age and the Roman Iron Age. The frontal bone from a Late Bronze Age juvenile skull from the Sculptor’s Cave, for example, bears evidence of processing through multiple anthropogenically induced striations that are indicative of the removal of the soft tissues (Armit & Büster Reference Armit and Büster2020, 192). The second funerary phase, dating to the Roman Iron Age, has evidence of multiple decapitations, with distinct cutmarks to the vertebrae which appear to result from executions rather than as a form of funerary rite (Armit et al. Reference Armit, Schulting, Knüsel and Shepherd2011, 258). Further evidence of decapitation can be seen at Slip Gill Windypit (26) in Yorkshire where one individual may have had their head forced down and to the side where it was held it in place for another to inflict a blow leading to trauma only detectable because a chopmark is present on the inferior aspect of the mandibular body (Leach Reference Leach2006, 267).

Perimortem trauma is also evident at the sites of Antofts Windypit (20) and Buckland’s Windypit (21) in Yorkshire. At Antofts, multiple Middle Bronze Age individuals display perimortem traumatic lesions that were almost certainly the cause of death. One example comes from an old/middle adult female who received a sharp force trauma to the cranial vault from a slim metal blade that caused radiating fractures around the periphery of the cut (Leach Reference Leach2006, 290). Further evidence comes from Buckland’s Windypit where several individuals bear evidence of blunt force trauma to the cranium (Leach Reference Leach2006, 325). The cranium is a common target during intentional violence due to the possibility to incapacitate, but also due to the close association of the skull with the identity of the individual (Knüsel Reference Knüsel, Thorpe and Parker Pearson2005, 55).

These instances of violence can be distinguished from evidence of defleshing which is often focused around areas of articulation in order to disarticulate the remains as an element of secondary funerary practice (eg, Russell Reference Russell1987, 394; Hallgren Reference Hallgren2011, 244). Defleshing can occur throughout various phases of the decomposition process leaving evidence in the form of cutmarks to the bone (Bello et al. Reference Bello, Wallduck, Dimitrijević, Živaljević and Stringer2016, 723) although perimortem cutmarks could only be made while the collagen of the bone remained fresh. Evidence for defleshing can be seen on both the worked tibia of unknown biological age from Torrs Cave (15) in Scotland (Morris Reference Morris1937, 427) and a tibia also with possible perimortem cutmarks from Antofts Windypit (20). The latter exhibits marks indicative of the removal of the soleus muscle from the posterior of the tibia (Leach Reference Leach2006, 299) whereas the former has been worked for an unknown purpose after defleshing has occurred (Morris Reference Morris1937, 425). Defleshing can accelerate decomposition and aid in the process of excarnation (Harding Reference Harding2016, 277) which is seen across many sites throughout the study period. The prevalence of defleshing in northern Britain contrasts with evidence from Bronze Age, Iron Age, and Roman Iron Age cave sites in Ireland, which show no evidence of deliberate defleshing but nonetheless exhibit strong evidence to suggest excarnation, principally in the form of high quantities of small skeletal elements (Fibiger Reference Fibiger2016, 13).

CONCLUSION

This paper has examined the wealth of evidence for later prehistoric and Romano-British funerary activity in caves in northern England and Scotland, revealing their distinctive funerary use. In particular, our analysis highlights the high levels of perimortem trauma evident on human remains from cave sites. The distinct funerary treatments accorded to different age groups, notably neonates and adult individuals, is also striking. This is especially significant due to the relative paucity of human remains that have been discovered in most parts of Britain dating to these periods and highlights the potential that caves have for the preservation of remains that are often otherwise archaeologically invisible. In particular, caves offer the potential for the identification and excavation of primary excarnation sites which are otherwise extremely elusive. Finally, this research provides a dataset for future study which could allow for further regional and temporal comparisons.

Acknowledgements

This paper is based on research initially conducted by one of the authors (Hume Reference Hume2021) for a Master’s thesis at the University of York. We would also like to thank Helen Goodchild for providing the map presented in Figure 3 and Rick Schulting for his kind permission to reproduce his photo represented here as Figure 6.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/ppr.2024.7

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

ARCHI UK. 2023. Archaeological sites, LiDAR and Old Maps. Online. ARCHI UK. Last Updated: 2023. https://www.archiuk.com/ [Accessed 24 February 2024]Google Scholar
Armit, I. 2020. Ritual violence and headhunting in Iron Age Europe. In Fagan, G., Fibiger, L. & Trundle, M, (eds), The Cambridge World History of Violence, 441–59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,Google Scholar
Armit, I. 2022. Macarthur Cave, Oban, Argyll and Bute, Scotland, UK. Supplementary Information 142 in Patterson, N., Isakov, M., Booth, T., Büster, L., Fischer, C.-E. et al., Large scale migration into southern Britain at the End of the Bronze Age. Nature 601, 588–94. https://10.1038/s41586-021-04287-4 Google Scholar
Armit, I. & Büster, L. 2020. Darkness Visible: The Sculptor’s Cave, Covesea, from the Bronze Age to the Picts. Edinburgh: Society of Antiquaries of Scotland Google Scholar
Armit, I. & Ginn, V. 2007. Beyond the grave: human remains from domestic contexts in Iron Age Atlantic Scotland. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 73, 113–34Google Scholar
Armit, I., Dunwell, A. & Hunter, F. 2002. The hill at the empire’s edge: recent work on Traprain Law. Transactions of the East Lothian Antiquarian and Field Naturalist’s Society 25, 111 Google Scholar
Armit, I., Schulting, R., Knüsel, C. & Shepherd, I. 2011. Death, decapitation and display? The Bronze and Iron Age human remains from the Sculptor’s Cave, Covesea, north-east Scotland. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 77, 251–78Google Scholar
Armstrong, A. 1956. Report on the excavation of Ash Tree Cave, near Whitwell, Derbyshire, 1949 to 1957. Derbyshire Archaeological Journal 76, 5764 Google Scholar
Barnes, F. 1970. Prehistoric pottery from Furness. Transactions of the Cumberland and Westmorland Antiquarian and Archaeological Society 70, 28 Google Scholar
Beckensall, S. 1976. The excavation of a rock shelter at Corby’s Crags, Edlingham. Archaeologia Aeliana 4, 1116 Google Scholar
Bello, S., Wallduck, R., Dimitrijević, V., Živaljević, I. & Stringer, C. 2016. Cannibalism versus funerary defleshing and disarticulation after a period of decay: comparisons of bone modifications from four prehistoric sites. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 161 (4), 722–43Google ScholarPubMed
Benton, S. 1931. The Excavation of the Sculptor’s Cave, Covesea, Morayshire. Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 65, 177216 Google Scholar
Bergsvik, K. & Skeates, R. 2012. Caves in Context: the cultural significance of caves and rockshelters in Europe. Oxford: Oxbow Books Google Scholar
Bergsvik, K. & Dowd, M. (eds). 2017. Caves and Ritual in Medieval Europe, ad 500–1500. Oxford: Oxbow Books Google Scholar
Birch, S. 2004. Evidence for Metalworking from Trench 1, Bone Passage – July 2004. http://www.high-pasture-cave.org/index.php/latest_finds/comments/73/ [Accessed 8 July 2021]Google Scholar
Birch, S. 2009. Latest Finds from the Fiskavaig Rock Shelter site. http://www.high-pasture-cave.org/index.php/latest_finds/comments/178/ [Accessed 7 July 2021]Google Scholar
Birch, S. & Mackenzie, J. forthcoming. High Pasture Cave: Ritual, memory and identity in the Iron Age of Skye. Oxford: Oxbow Books Google Scholar
Booth, T. 2022. Carsington Pasture Cave, Brassington, Derbyshire, England, UK, 51–3 in Patterson, N., Isakov, M., Booth, T., Büster, L., Fischer, C.-E. et al., Large scale migration into southern Britain at the end of the Bronze Age Nature 601, 588–94. https://10.1038/s41586-021-04287-4 Google Scholar
Bradley, R. 2019. The Prehistory of Britain and Ireland (2 edn). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Bradley, R. 2000. An Archaeology of Natural Places. Abingdon: Routledge Google Scholar
Bramwell, D., Dalton, K., Drinkwater, J., Hassall, M., Lorimer, K. & Mackreth, D. 1983. Excavations at Poole’s Cavern, Buxton: an interim report. Derbyshire Archaeological Journa, 103, 4774 Google Scholar
Branigan, K. & Dearne, M. 1991. A Gazetteer of Romano-British Cave Sites and Their Finds. Sheffield: Department of Archaeology and Prehistory, University of Sheffield Google Scholar
Brickley, M. & McKinley, J. 2004. Guidelines to the Standards for Recording Human Remains: IFA Paper 7. Southampton: BABAO, Department of Archaeology, University of Southampton Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C., Higham, T., Owen, D., Pike, A. & Hedges, R. 2002. Radiocarbon dates from the Oxford AMS system: Archaeometry datelist 31. Archaeometry 44(1), 1150 Google Scholar
Brück, J. 1999. Ritual and rationality: some problems of interpretation in European archaeology. European Journal of Archaeology 2(3), 313–44Google Scholar
Burgess, C. 1972. Goatscrag: a Bronze Age rock shelter cemetery in north Northumberland, with notes on other rock shelters and crag lines in the region. Archaeologia Aeliana 50, 1569 Google Scholar
Büster, L. 2014. The Covesea Caves Project. Society of Antiquaries of Scotland. Last updated: 2014. http://www.socantscot.org/research-project/the-covesea-caves-project/ [Accessed 11 August 2021]Google Scholar
Büster, L. & Armit, I. 2019. The Covesea Caves Project: Fieldwork 2018 Data Structure Report. Bradford: unpublished report, University of Bradford Google Scholar
Büster, L., Warmenbol, E. & Mlekuž, D. (eds). 2019. Between Worlds: understanding ritual cave use in later prehistory. New York: Springer CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canmore. 2022. National Record of the Historic Environment. CANMORE. https://canmore.org.uk/ [Accessed 7 May 2022]Google Scholar
Cameron, J., Arthurs, D., Cornhill, S., Morris, J. & Peterson, R. 2019. Human remains from Dunald Mill Hole, Nether Kellet, Lancashire, UK. Cave and Karst Science 48(1), 6973 Google Scholar
Carr, G. & Knüsel, C. 1997. The ritual framework of excarnation by exposure as the mortuary practice of the early and middle Iron Ages of central southern Britain. In Gwilt, A. & Haslegrove, C. (eds), Reconstructing Iron Age Societies: new approaches to the British Iron Age, 167–73. Oxford: Oxbow Books Google Scholar
Chamberlain, A. 1999. Carsington Pasture Cave, Brassington, Derbyshire: a prehistoric burial site. CAPRA 1. http://web.archive.org/web/20090906184710/http://www.capra.group.shef.ac.uk/1/carsing.html [Accessed 2 August 2021]Google Scholar
Chamberlain, A. 2012. Caves and the funerary landscape of prehistoric Britain. In Moyes (ed.) 2021, 81–6Google Scholar
Chamberlain, A. 2021. Gazetteer of Caves, Fissures and Rock Shelters in Britain Containing Human Remains. University of Bristol Spelaeological Society. Last Updated: September 2021. https://caveburial.ubss.org.uk/ [Accessed 7 May 2022]Google Scholar
Chamberlain, A., Mason, E. & Williams, N. 2020. Radiocarbon dating of vertebrate remains from Bull Pit, Perryfoot, Derbyshire. Proceedings of the University of Bristol Spelaeological Society 28(2), 329–57Google Scholar
Childe, V.G. 1925. The Dawn of European Civilization. London: Trubner Google Scholar
Clarke, W.B. 1876. Notice of excavations in the Borness Cave in the summer of 1874. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 11, 305–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, W.B. 1878. Final report on the Borness exploration. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 12, 669–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cree, J. 1909. Notice of the excavation of two caves, with remains of early Iron Age occupation, on the estate of Archerfield, Dirleton. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 43, 243–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culver, D. & Pipan, T. 2019. The Biology of Caves and Other Subterranean Habitats (2 edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B. 2018. The Ancient Celts (2 edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Dalaere, C. & Warmenbol, E. 2019. The watery way to the world of the dead: underwater excavations (old and new) at the Cave of Han-sur-Lesse, Belgium. In Büster et al. (eds) 2019, 137–64Google Scholar
Dearne, M. & Lord, T. 1998. The Romano-British Archaeology of Victoria Cave, Settle: researches into the site and its artefacts. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 273Google Scholar
Delannoy, J., David, B., Freslov, J., Mullet, R., GunaiKurnai Land and Waters Aboriginal Corporation., Green, H., Berthet, J., Petchey, F., Arnold, L., Wood, R., McDowell, M., Crouch, J., Mialanes, J., Ash, J. & Wong, V. 2020. Geomorphological context and formation history of Cloggs Cave: what was the cave like when people inhabited it? Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 33 (102461). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102461 Google Scholar
DECC = Department of the Environment, Climate and Communications. 2021. Coastal Erosion. https://www.gsi.ie/en-ie/geoscience-topics/natural-hazards/Pages/Coastal-Erosion.aspx [Accessed 25 May 2021]Google Scholar
Douglas, B. 2008. Climate to crania: science and the racialization of human difference. In Douglas, B. & Ballard, C. (eds), Foreign Bodies: Oceania and the science of race 1750–1940, 3396. Canberra: ANU Press Google Scholar
Dowd, M. (ed.) 2016. Underground Archaeology: studies on human bones and artefacts from Ireland’s caves. Oxford: Oxbow Books Google Scholar
Dowd, M. & Hensey, R. (eds). 2016. The Archaeology of Darkness. Oxford: Oxbow Books Google Scholar
Dulias, K., Birch, S., Wilson, J., Justeau, P., Gandini, F., Flaquer, A., Soares, P., Richards, M., Pala, M. & Edwards, C. 2019. Maternal relationships within an Iron Age burial at the High Pasture Cave, Isle of Skye, Scotland. Journal of Archaeological Science 110, 130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2019.104978 Google Scholar
Duncan, W. 2012. Biological distance analysis in contexts of ritual violence. In Martin, D., Harrod, R. & Perez, V. (eds), The Bioarchaeology of Violence, 251–75. Gainesville FL: University Press of Florida Google Scholar
Edensor, T. 2010. Walking in rhythms: place, regulation, style and the flow of experience. Visual Studies 25(1), 6979 Google Scholar
Elster, E.S., Isetti, E., Robb, J. and Traverso, A. 2016. The Archaeology of Grotta Scaloria: ritual in Neolithic southeast Italy. Los Angeles CA: Monumenta Archaeologica 38Google Scholar
Elliot, J. 1862a. On the discovery of human and animal bones in the Heathery Burn Cave, near Stanhope. The Geologist 5, 34–7Google Scholar
Elliot, J. 1862b. Further discoveries in Heathery Burn Cave. The Geologist 5, 167–71Google Scholar
Falys, C. & Lewis, M. 2011. Proposing a way forward: a review of standardisation in the use of age categories and ageing techniques in osteological analysis. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 21(6), 704–16Google Scholar
Fear, C. & O’Regan, H. 2019. The archaeology and human remains from Frank i’ th’ Rocks Cave, Derbyshire: a reassessment of the evidence. Cave and Karst Science 46(3), 99106 Google Scholar
Fibiger, L. 2016. Osteoarchaeological analysis of human remains from 23 Irish caves. In Dowd (ed.) 2016, 3–38Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick-Matthews, K. 2006. Bronze Age Occupation. The Archaeology of Carnden Park, Cheshire. http://www.kmatthews.org.uk/carden/carden5.html [Accessed 30 July 2021]Google Scholar
Giles, M. 2020. Bog Bodies: face to face with the past. Manchester: Manchester University Press CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilks, J. 1974. Early Bronze Age beakers from Pin Hole Cave, Creswell Crags. Derbyshire. Derbyshire Archaeological Journal 94, 815 Google Scholar
Gillieson, D. 2021. Caves: processes, development and management (2 edn). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell Google Scholar
Gooney, D. 2015. Life and Death in Iron Age Orkney: an osteoarchaeological examination of the human skeletal remains from the burial ground at Knowe of Skea, Westray. Unpublished PhD thesis: University of EdinburghGoogle Scholar
Halcrow, S. & Tayles, N. 2008. The bioarchaeological investigation of childhood and social age: problems and prospects. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 15, 190215 Google Scholar
Hallgren, F. 2011. Mesolithic skull depositions at Kanaljorden, Motala, Sweden. Current Swedish Archaeology 19, 244–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, D. 2016. Death and Burial in Iron Age Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Hedges, R., Housley, R., Bronk Ramsey, C. & van Klinken, G. 1991. Radiocarbon dates from the Oxford AMS system: Archaeometry datelist 13. Archaeometry 33(2), 279–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedges, R., Housley, R., Bronk Ramsey, C. & van Klinken, G. 1995. Radiocarbon dates from the Oxford AMS system: Archaeometry datelist 19. Archaeometry 37(1), 195214 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedges, R., Pettitt, P., Bronk Ramsey, C. & van Klinken, G. 1998. Radiocarbon dates from the Oxford AMS System: Archaeometry datelist 26. Archaeometry, 40(2), 437–55Google Scholar
Hume, B. 2021. A Light in Dark Places: an examination of funerary practices in northern English and Scottish caves from the Bronze Age to the Roman Iron Age. Unpublished MA thesis: University of YorkGoogle Scholar
Knüsel, C. 2005. The physical evidence of warfare – subtle stigmata? In Thorpe, I. & Parker Pearson, M. (eds), Warfare, Violence and Slavery in Prehistory: proceedings of a Prehistoric Society conference at Sheffield University. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 1374, 4966 Google Scholar
Layard, N. 1934. Evidence of human sacrifice in Seacliff Cave, Scotland. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society of East Anglia 7(3), 399401 Google Scholar
Leach, S. 2006. Going Underground: an anthropological and taphonomic study of human skeletal remains from caves and rock shelters in Yorkshire. Unpublished PhD thesis: University of WinchesterGoogle Scholar
Lord, T. & Howard, J. 2013. Cave archaeology. In Waltham, T. & Lowe, D. (eds), Caves and Karst of the Yorkshire Dales, 239–51. Great Hucklow: British Cave Research Association Google Scholar
Madgwick, R. 2008. Patterns in the modification of animal and human bones in Iron Age Wessex: revisiting the excarnation debate. In Davis, O., Sharples, N. & Waddington, K. (eds), Changing Perspectives on the First Millennium BC: proceedings of the Iron Age Research Student Seminar 2006, 99118. Oxford: Oxbow Books Google Scholar
Manias, C. 2013. Race, Science, and the Nation: reconstructing the ancient past in Britain, France and Germany. Abingdon: Routledge CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinón-Torres, M., d’Errico, F., Santos, E., Álvaro Gallo, A., Amano, N., Archer, W. et al. 2021. Earliest known human burial in Africa. Nature 593, 95100. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03457-8 Google ScholarPubMed
McGregor, G. 2003. Excavation of an urned cremation burial of the Bronze Age, Glennan, Argyll and Bute. Edinburgh: Scottish Archaeological Internet Report 8. https://doi.org/10.5284/1017938 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meethan, N. 2012. Walking the edges. Towards a visual ethnography of beachscapes. In Andrews, H. & Roberts, L. (eds), Liminal Landscapes: travel, experience and spaces in-between, 6986. Abingdon: Routledge Google Scholar
Merriam, C. 1884. Notes on classical archaeology. American Antiquarian and Oriental Journal 6(3), 209–14Google Scholar
Millett, M. & Gowland, R. 2015. Infant and child burial rites in Roman Britain: a study from East Yorkshire. Britannia 46, 171–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, S.V. 1937. Excavation of Torrs Cave, Kirkcudbright. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 71, 415–30Google Scholar
Morse, M. 1999. Craniology and the adoption of the Three-Age system in Britain. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 65, 116 Google Scholar
Moyes, H, (ed.). 2012. Sacred Darkness: a global perspective on the ritual use of caves. Denver CO: University Press of Colorado Google Scholar
Mullins, E., Kennard, A., Woodward, B., Kieth, A. & Hinton, M. 1913. The ossiferous cave at Langwith. Derbyshire Archaeological Journal 35, 137–58Google Scholar
O’Regan, H., Bland, K., Evans, J., Holmes, M., McLeod, K., Philpott, R., Smith, I., Thorp, J. & Wilkinson, D. 2020. Rural life, Roman ways? Examination of Late Iron Age to late Romano-British burial practice and mobility at Dog Hole Cave, Cumbria. Britannia 51, 83116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osterholtz, A., Swantek, L., Siver, N. & Davis, T. 2021. Struck down in the marketplace: bioarchaeological analysis of an individual recovered from the earthquake complex at Kourion. Journal of Archaeological Science Reports 40(A), 103203 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.103203 Google Scholar
Palmer, L. & Lee, L. 1928. Frank-I’-th’-Rocks Cave and other northern caves in relation to the ice ages. Proceedings of the University of Bristol Speleological Society 2(3), 244–60Google Scholar
Parker Pearson, M. 2017. Dead and (un)buried: reconstructing attitudes to death in long-term perspective. In Bradbury, J. & Scarre, C. (eds), Engaging with the Dead: exploring changing human beliefs about death, mortality and the human body, 129–37. Oxford: Oxbow Books Google Scholar
Peterson, R. 2013. Excavations at Fairy Holes Caves, Whitewell, Lancashire, 2013, 118. Preston: University of Central Lancashire Google Scholar
Peterson, R. 2019a. Do caves have agency? In Büster et al. (eds) 2019, 29–44Google Scholar
Peterson, R. 2019b. Neolithic Cave Burials: agency, structure and environment. Manchester: Manchester University Press Google Scholar
Pugh, T. 2005. Caves and artificial caves in late Postclassic Maya ceremonial groups. In Prufer, K. & Brady, J. (eds), Stone Houses and Earth Lords: Maya religion in the cave context, 4769. Denver CO: University of Colorado Press Google Scholar
Redfern, R. 2008. New evidence for Iron Age secondary burial practice and bone modification from Gussage All Saints and Maiden Castle (Dorset, England). Oxford Journal of Archaeology 27(3), 281301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redfern, R. 2016. Injury and Trauma in Bioarchaeology: interpreting violence in past lives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Google Scholar
Redfern, R. & Roberts, C. 2019. Trauma. In Buikstra, J. (ed.), Diagnosis of Pathological Conditions in Human Skeletal Remains (3 edn), 211–73. London: Academic Press CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, J.S. 1907. Notice of kitchen-midden deposits on North Berwick Law, and other antiquities in the vicinity of North Berwick; with a note of an undescribed sculptured stone, with symbols, in the island of Raasay. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 41, 428–30Google Scholar
Roberts, C. 2009. Human Remains in Archaeology: a handbook. York: Council for British Archaeology Google Scholar
Russell, M. 1987. Mortuary practices at the Krapina Neandertal site. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 72(3), 381–97Google ScholarPubMed
Ryder, P. 1974. The caves of the Beinn An Dubhaich area, Isle of Skye. Transactions of the British Cave Research Association 1(2), 101–26Google Scholar
Saville, A. & Hallén, Y. 1994. The ‘Obanian Iron Age’: human remains from the Oban cave sites, Argyll, Scotland. Antiquity 68, 715–23Google Scholar
Schulting, R. 2009. Report on human teeth from Sand. In Hardy, K. & Wickham-Jones, C. (eds), Mesolithic and Later Sites Around the Inner Sound, Scotland: the work of the Scotland’s First Settlers project 1998–2004, section 3.10. Edinburgh: Scottish Archaeological Internet Report 31. Available at https://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/archiveDS/archiveDownload?t=arch-310-1/dissemination/pdf/sair31.pdf Google Scholar
Shapland, F. & Armit, I. 2012. The useful dead: bodies as objects in Iron Age and Norse Atlantic Scotland. European Journal of Archaeology 15(1), 98116 Google Scholar
Sheridan, A., Armit, I., Reich, D., Booth, T., Bernados, R., Barnes, I. et al. 2019. A summary round-up list of Scottish archaeological human remains that have been sampled/analysed for DNA as of January 2019. Discovery and Excavation in Scotland 2019, 123 Google Scholar
Smith, I. 2012. Radio-carbon dating of bones from caves in Furness. Cumberland and Westmorland Antiquarian and Archaeological Society Newsletter 70, 116 Google Scholar
Stout, S. 2013. Cultural history, race, and peoples. In Tarlow, S. & Nilsson Stutz, L. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Death and Burial, 1726. Oxford: Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Tolan-Smith, C. 2001. The Caves of Mid Argyll: an archaeology of human use. Edinburgh: Society of Antiquaries of Scotland Monograph 20Google Scholar
Tucker, F. 2010. Woven Into the Stuff of Other Men’s Lives: the treatment of the dead in Iron Age Atlantic Scotland. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of BradfordGoogle Scholar
Turner, W. 1895. On human and animal remains found in caves at Oban, Argyllshire. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 29, 410–38Google Scholar
Ubelaker, H. 2015. The concept of perimortem in forensic science. In McSweeney, K. & Gerdau-Radonić, K. (eds), Trends in Biological Anthropology 1, 95–9. Oxford: Oxbow Books Google Scholar
Ustinova, Y. 2013. To live in joy and die with hope: experiential aspects of ancient Greek mystery rites. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 56(2), 105–23Google Scholar
Wedel, V. & Galloway, A. 2013. Common circumstances of blunt force trauma. In Wedel, V. & Galloway, A. (eds), Broken Bones: anthropological analysis of blunt force trauma (2 edn), 91125. Springfield IL: Charles C Thomas Google Scholar
Weiss-Krejci, E. 2013. The unburied dead. In Tarlow, S. & Nilsson Stutz, L. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Death and Burial, 281302. Oxford: Oxford University Press Google Scholar
Whimster, R. 1981. Burial Practices in Iron Age Britain: a discussion and gazetteer of the evidence c.700 B.C.–A.D.43 Part 1. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 90Google Scholar
Wilford, S. 2016. Riddles in the Dark? The human use of caves during the 1st millennia BC and AD across the British Isles. Unpublished PhD thesis, Durham UniversityGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. The Sculptor’s Cave, Moray, Scotland (courtesy of the Sculptor’s Cave Archive)

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Locations of the 200 identified individuals from our dataset

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Locations of the 42 cave sites within our dataset. Some points overlap, indicating the close proximity of certain sites (map kindly produced by Helen Goodchild)

Figure 3

Table 1. All sites in scotland

Figure 4

Table 2. All sites in north-east england

Figure 5

Table 3. All sites in north-west england

Figure 6

Fig. 4. The quantity of funerary practices from all periods and regions of study. BA: Bronze Age; IA: Iron Age; RIA: Roman Iron Age

Figure 7

Fig. 5. Numbers of disarticulated individuals & inhumations from High Pasture Cave, Skye (2), Dog Hole Cave, Cumbria (37), & Carsington Pasture Cave, Derbyshire (29)

Figure 8

Fig. 6. Evidence of sharp force trauma inflicted by a sword to the left vertebral arch of an individual from the Sculptor’s Cave: A: superior view; B: closer detail of trauma (courtesy of Rick Schulting)

Supplementary material: File

Hume and Armit supplementary material

Hume and Armit supplementary material
Download Hume and Armit supplementary material(File)
File 274.1 KB