Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:56:02.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Generation of multi-watt sub-50 fs pulses in Mamyshev oscillators: influence of the central wavelength in the grating filter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 December 2024

Feihong Qiao
Affiliation:
School of Physical Science and Technology, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, China
Jinbo Wang
Affiliation:
School of Physical Science and Technology, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, China
Xinhe Dou
Affiliation:
School of Physical Science and Technology, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, China
Xiang Li
Affiliation:
School of Physical Science and Technology, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, China
Bole Song
Affiliation:
School of Physical Science and Technology, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, China
Zhiguo Lv*
Affiliation:
School of Physical Science and Technology, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, China
*
Correspondence to: Z. Lv, School of Physical Science and Technology, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China. Email: lvzhiguo@imu.edu.cn

Abstract

Mamyshev oscillators (MOs) exhibit the potential for generating high average power and ultrashort pulses. Herein, we construct an MO using flexible double-cladding ytterbium-fiber with a fusion-spliced-combiner pumped scheme. Consistent with the most reported research results, the offset filter separation significantly affects the pulse characteristics (spectrum, pulse duration, etc.). Notably, in comparison with red-shifting, blue-shifting the peak spectral emission of the grating filter relative to a constant central wavelength of the bandpass filter substantially enhances the laser output characteristics. This phenomenon, which has not been previously reported, results in an average power up to 2.23 W and a pulse duration as short as 49 fs. To our knowledge, this is the highest average power achieved in sub-50 fs pulse duration in the nonlinear polarization rotation-assisted mode-locked MO laser architecture. The presented technique offers unique scientific proof for developing ultrafast laser sources with higher average power and shorter pulse duration.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with Chinese Laser Press

1 Introduction

With the rapid development of laser technology, ultrafast laser systems play an important role in femtosecond micromachining, biomedical imaging microsurgery and precision spectroscopy[ Reference Han, Guo, Gao, Ma, Zhang and Zhang1 ]. In ordinary laser systems, so as to scale average power and/or pulse energy, the cascaded amplifier stages are frequently utilized after the seed sources[ Reference Liu, Liao, Zhao, Cui, Song, Wang and Hu2 ]. Continuous exploration of seed sources with superior performance is crucial for streamlining and enhancing the efficiency of these laser systems. Currently, passively mode-locked fiber lasers have emerged as one of the most effective seed sources for generating high average power and ultrashort pulses[ Reference Li, Gao, Ma, Wu, Huo, Han, Wageh, AI-Hartomy, AI-Sehemi, Liu and Zhang3 ]. Normally, pulse generation in these fiber lasers relies on saturable absorbers, categorized into material-based real saturable absorbers[ Reference Luo, Li, Gao, Xu, Li and Liu4 Reference Han, Gao, Wen, Ma, Huo, Li, Zhou, Li, Wu and Liu9 ] and artificial saturable absorbers relevant to the nonlinear effects of optical fibers[ Reference Guo, Li, Guo and Zheng10 Reference Qiu, Lv, Li and Wang14 ]. However, fiber lasers have been confronted with a significant challenge in effectively managing nonlinearities within the waveguide media[ Reference Li, Gao, Ma, Wu, Huo, Han, Wageh, AI-Hartomy, AI-Sehemi, Liu and Zhang3 ], which impedes the development of high-average-power ultrashort pulsed fiber seed sources.

Mamyshev oscillators (MOs) have gained much attention due to their promising tolerance for high nonlinear phase shift and large modulation depth[ Reference Li, Gao, Ma, Wu, Huo, Han, Wageh, AI-Hartomy, AI-Sehemi, Liu and Zhang3 , Reference Marš, Agrež and Petkovšek15 ], effectively addressing the challenge mentioned above in fiber lasers. Consequently, MOs have become the preferred method for generating higher average power and shorter laser pulses. The mode-locking mechanism relies on self-phase modulation (SPM) and offset spectral filtering to achieve the power amplification and spectral broadening of pulses[ Reference Piché16 Reference Rochette, Chen, Sun and Cordero18 ]. Up to now, utilizing various cavity configurations, researchers have achieved substantial research progress in MOs regarding energy promotion, pulse shortening, power scaling and so on[ Reference Sidorenko, Fu, Wright, Olivier and Wise19 Reference Ma, Khanolkar, Zang and Chong22 ]. In this mechanism, one primary challenge is that MOs generally cannot be self-starting. To initiate MOs, researchers have employed several approaches including external seeding[ Reference Regelskis, Želudevičius, Viskontas and Račiukaitis23 Reference Repgen, Schuhbauer, Hinkelmann, Wandt, Wienke, Morgner, Neumann and Kracht25 ], external starting arms[ Reference Li, Ma, Liu, Huang, Cui, Luo, Mou, Xu and Luo26 Reference Boulanger, Olivier, Guilbert-Savary, Trépanier, Bernier and Piché28 ] and pump modulation[ Reference Chen, Sidorenko, Thorne and Wise29 , Reference Luo, Tuan, Suzuki and Ohishi30 ]. These methods effectively achieve sufficient optical fluctuations to initiate MOs, but concurrently introduce complexity to these laser configurations. In this regard, researchers couple the nonlinear polarization rotation (NPR) mechanism with the MOs to achieve self-starting mode-locking operation[ Reference Ma, Khanolkar, Zang and Chong22 , Reference Cao, Gao, Ding, Xiao, Yang and Bao31 ]. In addition, the NPR mechanism could effectively enhance the Kerr nonlinear effect in fibers while simultaneously offering a flexible and controllable output coupling ratio. Using this method, a pulse duration of 4.16 ps can be obtained[ Reference Han, Chen, Zhang, Xie, Tian, Yao, Huang and Zhang32 ]. Further increasing the filter separation, the pulse duration can be compressed down to 65 fs[ Reference Guo, Lu, He, Zhang, Ma, Jiao and Lai33 ]. Moreover, combined with a nonlinear photonic crystal fiber, the scheme enables the pulse duration to shorten to 17 fs[ Reference Ma, Khanolkar, Zang and Chong22 ]. To date, in NPR-assisted mode-locked MOs (as shown in Table 1), average power is invariably limited to the milliwatt level. Thus, the potential of NPR-based MOs still needs to be further explored, especially in the context of achieving sub-50 fs pulse duration while sustaining watt-level average power output.

Table 1 Summary of the no-seed MO.

aGMNA, gain-managed nonlinear amplification.

In addition, high average power is essential for numerous applications of femtosecond MO lasers. To acquire higher average power in MOs, large-mode-area photonic crystal fibers[ Reference Liu, Liao, Zhao, Cui, Song, Wang and Hu2 ] or large-core-diameter flexible double-cladding (DC) fibers[ Reference Lin, Xu, He, Feng, Ren, Sidharthan, Jung, Yoo and Richardson21 , Reference Lin, Feng, Ren and Richardson40 ] are typically utilized in MO lasers. These methods, which generally involve free-space pumping, add complexity to the laser system. Moreover, pump misalignment related to mechanical drift degrades the laser stability. As mentioned above, many researchers typically employ various types of fibers and higher pump powers to enhance output characteristics. However, we think it makes more sense to attain comparable laser output characteristics directly from an MO using flexible DC ytterbium-fiber (Yb-fiber) within a fusion-spliced-combiner pumped scheme. This necessitates studying the relationship between cavity parameters and output characteristics. Under this scheme, by increasing the filter separation, carefully adjusting the polarization state and optimizing the pump power, watt-level average power while maintaining short pulse widths may be achievable. This approach effectively increases the gain fiber nonlinearity and overcomes the limited gain bandwidth, thereby facilitating broad-spectrum generation. Consequently, this strategy allows for the replacement of photonic crystal fibers or larger core fibers with cost-effective flexible fibers, and considerable output performance can be achieved directly from the NPR-based MO.

Based on the above, an MO is constructed using a flexible DC Yb-fiber, leveraging the NPR mechanism to initiate mode-locking. For further promoting the laser output performance, the impact of the filter separation on the output characteristics is explored. Both increments in filter separation and pump power enhance the average power and narrow the pulse width, which is consistent with the prevailing research results. Furthermore, under equivalent conditions, better output performance can be achieved as the center wavelength of the grating filter is blue-shifted, in comparison to its being red-shifted relative to transmission filter with constant central wavelength. This phenomenon, to our knowledge, has not been reported previously. This phenomenon may be attributed to the larger modulation depth and less nonlinear dispersion when the grating filter is blue-shifted, which results in higher average power and shorter pulse duration. Based on the above findings, optimization techniques have facilitated the achievement of an average power of 2.23 W and a pulse duration of 49 fs. This research has substantially enriched the performance of MO generating both high power and short pulse width in the no-seed mode.

2 Experimental setup

As illustrated in Figure 1, the experimental setup consists of two Mamyshev regenerators designated as arms 1 and 2, respectively. In each arm, a section of ytterbium-doped double-clad fiber (YDF, Yb1200-10/125DC, LIEKKI) is used as a gain medium. The gain fiber is co-pumped with multimode laser diodes with power up to 9 W at 976 nm through fusion spliced combiners. The gain fibers in arms 1 and 2 are 1.4 and 1.6 m, respectively. To facilitate the investigation of the effect of the offset spectra filter on laser characteristics, a 1000 lines/mm transmission grating in combination with a collimator is used in arm 1 as a variable spectra filter (grating filter), which is adjusted to support a full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) spectral bandwidth of 1.2 nm. By moving the collimator, the transmitted central wavelength could be consecutively tuned from 1020 to 1040 nm or even broader. In arm 2, the bandpass filter (BPF) features a constant spectral bandwidth of 3 nm at 1030 nm central wavelength. An NPR configuration is constructed to initial the laser. It incorporates a pair of quarter-wave plates (QWPs), a half-wave plate (HWP) and a polarization beam splitter (PBS). This configuration simplifies the laser cavity and enables the generation of single-pulse operation through only increments in pump power. To ensure unidirectional oscillation of light within the cavity, an isolator (ISO) is inserted between the two arms. The output pulses are dechirped with a grating compressor, consisting of two transmission gratings (1000 lines/mm).

Figure 1 Schematic setup for investigating the effect of the offset spectral filter on laser characteristics. Col, collimator; YDF, Yb-doped fiber; BPF, bandpass filter; QWP, quarter-wave plate; HWP, half-wave plate; PBS, polarization beam splitter; ISO, isolator.

3 Results

So as to obtain ultrashort pulses and elevated average power, the influence of spectral filtering separation ( $\Delta\lambda_{\mathrm{f}}$ ) on laser output characteristics is explored. To initiate the mode-locking operation, the center wavelength of the grating filter is tuned to 1030 nm initially, which overlaps with that of the BPF in arm 2. In the case, the low-peak-power noise can be easily transmitted through two filters, thereby initiating pulsed operation. Furthermore, the presence of two QWPs, an HWP and a PBS could act as an NPR, assisting the self-starting of the laser[ Reference Yan, Li, Zhang and Liu39 ]. When the powers from pump laser diodes (LD1 and LD2) are increased to 1.8 and 2.2 W, respectively, by simply rotating the waveplates, self-starting mode-locking operation can be achieved.

Once initiated, stable mode-locking with the fundamental repetition rate can still be maintained via proper cavity parameters, such as the pump power and output coupling ratio. Firstly, the transmission band of the grating filter is separated with respect to 1030 nm and red-shifted. With increasing $\Delta\lambda_{\mathrm{f}}$ , the mode-locked spectrum is broadened and red-shifted gradually. This phenomenon is attributed to enhanced nonlinear effects resulting from the crossed offset spectral shaping mechanism. As the $\Delta\lambda_{\mathrm{f}}$ increases up to 10 nm, the broadest mode-locked spectrum (shown in Figure 2(a)) is obtained. The corresponding pump powers emitted from LDs 1 and 2 are 7 and 7.4 W, respectively. The spectrum is presented in Figure 2(a), in which the 10 dB bandwidth is around 42 nm, accompanied by the emergence of the stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) component at 1060 nm. After compression, with a 1000 lines/mm grating pair, the duration of the pulse is measured to be 59 fs (FWHM), as shown in Figure 2(b). The slight pedestal should be attributed to the uncompensated nonlinear chirping induced by high-order dispersion and nonlinear effects, including SRS. Figure 2(c) shows the measured pulse train with an interval of 32.7 ns, corresponding to the fundamental repetition rate of 30.58 MHz. The radio frequency (RF) spectrum around the fundamental repetition rate is illustrated in Figure 2(d), showing a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of up to 71.8 dB. The beam profile captured by the laser beam profiler is displayed in the inset of Figure 2(b), confirming the fundamental mode operation.

Figure 2 Experimental results. (a) Spectrum. (b) Autocorrelation trace; inset, the intensity profile of the output laser beam. (c) Pulse train. (d) RF spectrum.

Figure 3 Experimental results under different $\Delta\lambda_{\mathrm{f}}$ . (a)–(c) Blue-shifted mode-locked spectra. (e)–(g) Red-shifted mode-locked spectra. (h)–(j) Blue-shifted autocorrelation trace. (l)–(n) Red-shifted autocorrelation trace. (d), (k) Mode-locked spectra and autocorrelation trace as $\Delta\lambda_{\mathrm{f}}$ = 0; inset, zoom-in of the CW state.

However, further increasing $\Delta\lambda_{\mathrm{f}}$ leads to instability in mode-locking. This phenomenon occurs because the optical signal received by the collimator weakens when $\Delta\lambda_{\mathrm{f}}$ exceeds 10 nm. This weakening indicates an increase in the coupling loss between the collimator and the grating. Then, after gain amplification, the spectral broadening cannot reach the bandwidth required by the BPF, which affects the mode-locking stability. Subsequently, to better understand the impact of $\Delta\lambda_{\mathrm{f}}$ on the laser characteristics, the transmission band of the grating filter is separated with respect to 1030 nm and blue-shifted. As $\Delta\lambda_{\mathrm{f}}$ increases, the spectra exhibit differences compared to those recorded when the grating filter is red-shifted. To analyze the reasons for these differences, under the same $\Delta\lambda_{\mathrm{f}}$ , pump power and polarization state, the spectra and autocorrelation traces are recorded (shown in Figure 3), in which the grating filter is deviated relative to the BPF in opposite directions.

As shown in Figure 3, as $\Delta\lambda_{\mathrm{f}}$ increases from zero, the mode-locked spectra are broadened and red-shifted gradually due to gain saturation and reabsorption effects in the Yb-doped fiber. With the spectra broadened, the corresponding pulses are compressed to shorter durations. In the meantime, remarkable SRS components also emerge. It is interesting to note that wider spectrum and shorter pulse duration can be achieved as the center wavelength of the grating filter is blue-shifted, compared to the case when it is red-shifted. This phenomenon appears to correlate with the modulation depth of MOs. Firstly, when $\Delta\lambda_{\mathrm{f}}$ is zero, the high spectral overlap between the two filters prevents achieving high modulation depth in the MO. Consequently, the continuous wave (CW) component cannot be suppressed due to the insufficient modulation depth, resulting in a strong CW peak at 1030 nm (shown in Figure 3(d)). This has been observed in many reported MOs[ Reference Liu, Liao, Zhao, Cui, Song, Wang and Hu2 , Reference Liu, Ziegler, Wright and Wise24 , Reference Cao, Gao, Ding, Xiao, Yang and Bao31 ]. Secondly, the modulation depth can be gradually enhanced by increasing $\Delta\lambda_{\mathrm{f}}$ , thereby gradually suppressing the CW component[ Reference Liu, Ziegler, Wright and Wise24 , Reference Pitois, Finot, Provost and Richardson41 ]. This is evidenced in Figures 3(a)3(c) and 3(e)3(g), where the CW component gradually diminishes with the increment in $\Delta\lambda_{\mathrm{f}}$ . This observation suggests that the CW component in spectra can, to some extent, reflect the intensity of modulation depth in the MO. It is noteworthy that when the grating filter is red-shifted, $\Delta\lambda_{\mathrm{f}}$ needs to be increased to 10 nm to fully suppress the CW component. In contrast, in the event of blue-shift, the CW component is fully suppressed at $\Delta\lambda_{\mathrm{f}}$  = 3 nm. Therefore, compared to red-shifting, blue-shifting could effectively enhance the modulation depth in the MO, resulting in higher average power and shorter pulse duration.

Figure 4 SNR of the grating filter at different center wavelengths.

On the other hand, the dispersion in optical fibers is also a factor that affects the laser output performance (including spectra and pulse widths). For ultrashort light pulses whose duration is shorter than 100 fs, the basic equation that governs the propagation of the optical field ( $\phi \left(s,t\right)$ ) in fiber and includes the effects of both the group-velocity dispersion (GVD) and third-order dispersion (TOD) can be written as follows[ Reference Kruglov and Triki42 ]:

(1) $$\begin{align}i\frac{\partial \phi }{\partial s}&={D}_2(s)\frac{\partial^2\phi }{\partial {t}^2}+i{D}_3(s)\frac{\partial^3\phi }{\partial {t}^3}-{R}_1(s){\left|\phi \right|}^2\phi \nonumber\\&\quad-i{R}_2(s)\frac{\partial }{\partial t}\left({\left|\phi \right|}^2\phi \right)+ iG(s)\phi,\end{align}$$

where R 1(s) and R 2(s) are related to the Kerr nonlinearity and self-steepening effect, respectively, G(s) represents the amplification or absorption coefficient and parameters D 2(s) and D 3(s) are the variable parameters of GVD and TOD, respectively. The GVD and TOD are given by the following equations[ Reference Lakoba and Agrawal43 ]:

(2) $$\begin{align}\begin{array}{c} \displaystyle \mathrm{GVD}=\frac{1}{C}\;\left(2\frac{\mathrm{d} n}{\mathrm{d}\omega}+\omega \frac{\mathrm{d}^2n}{\mathrm{d}{\omega}^2}\right)=\frac{\lambda^3L}{2\pi {c}^2}\frac{\mathrm{d}^2n}{\mathrm{d}{\lambda}^2},\end{array}\end{align}$$
(3) $$\begin{align} \begin{array}{c}\displaystyle \mathrm{TOD}=\frac{L}{C}\left(3\frac{\mathrm{d}^2n}{{\mathrm{d}\omega}^2}+\omega \frac{\mathrm{d}^3n}{\mathrm{d}{\omega}^3}\right)=\frac{-{\lambda}^4L}{4{\pi}^2{c}^3}\left(3\frac{\mathrm{d}^2n}{\mathrm{d}{\lambda}^2}+\lambda \frac{\mathrm{d}^3n}{\mathrm{d}{\lambda}^3}\right),\end{array}\end{align}$$

where $n$ is the refractive index. The refractive index of background material silica is measured by the following Sellmier equation[ Reference Malitson44 ]:

(4) $$\begin{align} \begin{array}{c}\displaystyle {n}^2=1+\sum \limits_{j=1}^N\frac{\lambda^2{B}_j}{\lambda^2-{\lambda}_j^2},\end{array}\end{align}$$

where $N=3$ , ${B}_1=0.6961663$ , ${B}_2=0.4079426$ , ${B}_3=0.8974794$ , ${\lambda}_1=0.0684043$ , ${\lambda}_2=0.1162414$ and ${\lambda}_3=9.896161$ [ Reference Malitson44 ]. Set the length $L=6.7\;\mathrm{m}$ . By substituting wavelengths of 1020 and 1040 nm into the TOD equation, the corresponding TOD values are found to be $3.653\times {10}^{-3}$ and $3.948\times {10}^{-3}\;{\mathrm{fs}}^3$ , respectively. Consequently, the TOD is stronger in the long-wavelength band than in the short-wavelength band. As the TOD increases, the amplitude of pulse propagation oscillations in fiber also increases. This leads to longer trailing edges and more pronounced pulse distortion. Hence, in contrast to red-shifting, blue-shifting exhibits lower dispersion, facilitating more effective extra-cavity compression and resulting in narrower pulse widths.

In addition, most of the reported MOs utilize either two BPFs or two grating filters. Therefore, the impact of the center wavelength shift of the filter on the laser output characteristics has long been neglected. This may be the reason why this phenomenon has not been reported yet. To further explore this phenomenon, under the same conditions, the variation in SNR with respect to $\Delta\lambda_{\mathrm{f}}$ is recorded (shown in Figure 4). When $\Delta\lambda_{\mathrm{f}}$ ranges from 0 to 3 nm, the SNR remains essentially unchanged. This is because the MO cannot function as a saturable absorption with high modulation depth when $\Delta\lambda_{\mathrm{f}}$ is less than 3 nm. With the increment in $\Delta\lambda_{\mathrm{f}}$ , the modulation depth correspondingly increases, leading to an enhancement in the SNR. Notably, the SNR is higher when the grating filter is blue-shifted, in contrast to the case when it is red-shifted. When the grating filter is blue-shifted, the center wavelength is blue-shifted from the peak of the gain spectrum, thereby reducing the impact of CW background noise. Furthermore, when the grating filter is blue-shifted, the increments in modulation depth can more effectively suppress noise components within the pulse and filter out unwanted spectral elements, thereby enhancing the SNR. In this case, pulse evolution would only distort slightly even at higher pump powers, achieving a high SNR. Therefore, a higher SNR can be achieved when the grating filter is blue-shifted.

As mentioned above, when the grating filter is blue-shifted, the increments in modulation depth in the MO can lead to enhanced performance, including a wider spectrum, shorter pulse duration and higher SNR. The modulation depth may be attributed to several factors, such as the gain medium, the dispersion properties and the nonlinear effects. A blue-shifted central wavelength typically falls within a region where the gain spectrum of the laser medium is less saturated. This lower saturation allows for more effective modulation of the laser intensity, thereby increasing the modulation depth. In addition, the dispersion properties of the fiber at blue-shifted wavelengths can enhance the interaction between the optical field and the nonlinear medium, further contributing to a larger modulation depth.

Figure 5 Experimental results. (a) Spectrum. (b) Autocorrelation trace; inset, the intensity profile of the output laser beam. (c) Pulse train. (d) RF spectrum.

Figure 6 Power stability measurement of the mode-locked MO within 3 hours.

Under the guidance of the above experiments, the laser parameters are further optimized. Firstly, the central wavelength of the grating filter is adjusted to 1020 nm. In addition, the total dispersion is further optimized by reducing the combiner pigtail length and increasing the gain fiber length. As the pump power is increased, the QWP and HWP before the PBS must be slightly rotated to adjust the output coupling ratio. When the pump powers emitted from LDs 1 and 2 are 8.0 and 8.2 W, respectively, the broadest spectrum as wide as 85 nm (10 dB bandwidth) is obtained, as seen in Figure 5(a). The modulated sideband is caused by the SPM effect. The modulation sidebands are attributed to higher-order dispersion resulting from nonlinear phase accumulation during pulse evolution and SPM effects within the gain fiber during cavity evolution. These factors can lead to pulse asymmetry and pedestal generation. As shown in Figure 5(b), after compression, the pulse duration is reduced to 49 fs, which is shorter than the previously measured duration. The pulse has a small amount of pedestal structure, which we estimate to comprise less than 15% of the pulse energy. Figure 5(c) shows the corresponding pulse trains. The interval between adjacent pulses is 32.8 ns, corresponding to a fundamental repetition rate of 30.48 MHz, which is determined by the new cavity length. The SNR, as shown in Figure 5(d), is about 80 dB, indicating stable operation in the MO. This high SNR can be attributed to the optimization of laser parameters. The inset in Figure 5(b) depicts the output beam, and the strict single mode characteristic of the high-average-power working is verified. In the case of optimum parameters, the maximum output average power of the oscillator is 2.23 W. To the best of our knowledge, our results represent the highest average power in sub-50 fs pulse duration in NPR-based MOs.

MO stability is also assessed under the maximum average power. The output average power is continuously recorded at 1-second intervals, with the data presented in Figure 6. The root mean square (RMS) fluctuation of the recorded power values is calculated to be about 0.20%, indicating a high level of power stability.

4 Conclusion

In conclusion, we construct an NPR-based MO using a flexible DC Yb-fiber, pumped with a fusion spliced combiner. The influence of the offset spectral filter on the laser characteristics is explored. It is found that increasing the filter separation and pump power enhances the average power and narrows the pulse width. Notably, the experiments reveal for the first time that blue-shifting the grating filter, as opposed to red-shifting it, significantly enhances the laser performance. This enhancement includes more broadened spectra, much shorter pulse width and much higher SNR. Further optimization enables an average power of 2.23 W, a pulse duration of 49 fs and an SNR of approximately 80 dB. Recent research results on MOs without seed injection are summarized in Table 1. The results from our work are nearly comparable with the state-of-the-art results reported by Haig et al. [ Reference Haig, Sidorenko, Thorne and Wise38 ]. To the best of our knowledge, our results represent the highest average power in sub-50 fs pulse duration in the NPR-based mode-locked MO laser architecture. These results not only enrich the experimental phenomena of MOs, but also provide a valuable reference for the realization of higher-average-power laser pulses in much shorter pulse duration in MOs.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (No. 12164030), Young Science and Technology Talents of Inner Mongolia (No. NJYT22101) and Central Government Guides Local Science and Technology Development Fund (No. 2023ZY0005).

References

Han, Y., Guo, Y., Gao, B., Ma, C., Zhang, R., and Zhang, H., Prog. Quantum Electron. 71, 100264 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, W., Liao, R., Zhao, J., Cui, J., Song, Y., Wang, C., and Hu, M., Optica 6, 194 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y. Y., Gao, B., Ma, C. Y., Wu, G., Huo, J. Y., Han, Y., Wageh, S., AI-Hartomy, Q. A., AI-Sehemi, A. G., Liu, L., and Zhang, H., Laser Photonics Rev. 17, 2200596 (2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, H., Li, J., Gao, Y., Xu, Y., Li, X., and Liu, Y., Opt. Lett. 44, 2322 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yao, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhu, J., Dang, K., Su, C., Ma, J., Chen, K., Wang, B., Liu, W., Xu, S., Zhao, S., Zhang, J., and Hao, Y., Appl. Phys. Lett. 123, 202104 (2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, B., Li, Y. Y., Ma, C. Y., Shu, Y. Q., Wu, G., Chen, B. K., Huo, J. Y., Han, Y., Liu, L., and Zhang, Y., J. Alloys Compd. 900, 163529 (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, X., An, M., Li, G., Han, Y., Guo, P., Chen, E., Hu, J., Song, Z., Lu, H., and Lu, J., Adv. Mater. Interfaces 9, 2101933 (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, W., Liu, M., Liu, X., Wang, X., Teng, H., Lei, M., Wei, Z., and Wei, Z., Appl. Phys. Lett. 116, 061901 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Y., Gao, B., Wen, H., Ma, C., Huo, J., Li, Y., Zhou, L., Li, Q., Wu, G., and Liu, L., Light: Sci. Appl. 13, 101 (2024).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, Y. X., Li, X. H., Guo, P. L., and Zheng, H. R., Opt. Express 26, 9893 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ou, S., Liu, G., Qiu, D., Guo, L., and Zhang, Q., Opt. Express 28, 23670 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, J., Zhou, J., Jiang, Y., Li, L., Shen, D., Komarov, A., Su, L., Tang, D., Klimczak, M., and Zhao, L., J. Lightwave Technol. 38, 6069 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renninger, W. H., Chong, A., and Wise, F. W., Phys. Rev. A 77, 023814 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qiu, J., Lv, Z., Li, X., and Wang, S., IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 35, 625 (2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marš, M., Agrež, V., and Petkovšek, R., Opt. Laser Technol. 163, 109421 (2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piché, M., Proc. SPIE 2041, 358 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mamyshev, P. V., IEEE Eur. Conf. Opt. Commun. 1, 475 (1998).Google Scholar
Rochette, M., Chen, L. R., Sun, K., and Cordero, J. H., IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 20, 1497 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidorenko, P., Fu, W., Wright, L. G., Olivier, M., and Wise, F. W., Opt. Lett. 43, 2672 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulanger, V., Olivier, M., Morasse, B., Trépanier, F., Bernier, M., and Piché, M., Opt. Lett. 49, 2201 (2024).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, D., Xu, D., He, J., Feng, Y., Ren, Z., Sidharthan, R., Jung, Y., Yoo, S., and Richardson, D. J., J. Lightwave Technol. 40, 7175 (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, C., Khanolkar, A., Zang, T., and Chong, A., Photonics Res. 8, 65 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regelskis, K., Želudevičius, J., Viskontas, K., and Račiukaitis, G., Opt. Lett. 40, 5255 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Z., Ziegler, Z. M., Wright, L. G., and Wise, F. W., Optica 4, 649 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Repgen, P., Schuhbauer, B., Hinkelmann, M., Wandt, D., Wienke, A., Morgner, U., Neumann, J., and Kracht, D., Opt. Express 28, 13837 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, T. J., Ma, G. M., Liu, M., Huang, Q. Q., Cui, H., Luo, A. P., Mou, C. B., Xu, W. C., and Luo, Z. C., Opt. Express 31, 39250 (2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olivier, M., Boulanger, V., Guilbert-Savary, F., Sidorenko, P., Wise, F. W., and Piché, M., Opt. Lett. 44, 851 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulanger, V., Olivier, M., Guilbert-Savary, F., Trépanier, F., Bernier, M., and Piché, M., Opt. Lett. 45, 3317 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y. H., Sidorenko, P., Thorne, R., and Wise, F., J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 38, 743 (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, X., Tuan, T. H., Suzuki, T., and Ohishi, Y., Opt. Lett. 45, 2530 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, B., Gao, C., Ding, Y., Xiao, X., Yang, C., and Bao, C., Opt. Lett. 47, 4584 (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, H., Chen, N. K., Zhang, L., Xie, Y., Tian, Z., Yao, Y., Huang, Y., and Zhang, X., Photonics 8, 590 (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, W., Lu, S., He, Q., Zhang, B., Ma, S., Jiao, Z., and Lai, T., Laser Phys. Lett. 19, 085101 (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, X., Tuan, T. H., Saini, T. S., Nguyen, H. P. T., Suzuki, T., and Ohishi, Y., J. Lightwave Technol. 38, 1468 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sui, Y., Jin, L., Liu, Y., Zhang, H., and Xu, Y., J. Lightwave Technol. 42, 1605 (2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, C., Li, X., and Zhang, S., Laser Photonics Rev. 17, 2201016 (2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, J., Wang, C., Li, X., Han, M., and Zhang, S., Opt. Express 32, 5851 (2024).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haig, H., Sidorenko, P., Thorne, R., and Wise, F., Opt. Lett. 47, 762 (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, D., Li, X., Zhang, S., and Liu, J., Opt. Express 29, 9805 (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, D., Feng, Y., Ren, Z., and Richardson, D. J., Nanophotonics 11, 847 (2022).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pitois, S., Finot, C., Provost, L., and Richardson, D. J., J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 25, 1537 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruglov, V. I. and Triki, H., Phys. Rev. A 103, 013521 (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoba, T. I., and Agrawal, G. P., J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 16, 1332 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malitson, I. H., J. Opt. Soc. Am. 55, 1205 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Summary of the no-seed MO.

Figure 1

Figure 1 Schematic setup for investigating the effect of the offset spectral filter on laser characteristics. Col, collimator; YDF, Yb-doped fiber; BPF, bandpass filter; QWP, quarter-wave plate; HWP, half-wave plate; PBS, polarization beam splitter; ISO, isolator.

Figure 2

Figure 2 Experimental results. (a) Spectrum. (b) Autocorrelation trace; inset, the intensity profile of the output laser beam. (c) Pulse train. (d) RF spectrum.

Figure 3

Figure 3 Experimental results under different $\Delta\lambda_{\mathrm{f}}$. (a)–(c) Blue-shifted mode-locked spectra. (e)–(g) Red-shifted mode-locked spectra. (h)–(j) Blue-shifted autocorrelation trace. (l)–(n) Red-shifted autocorrelation trace. (d), (k) Mode-locked spectra and autocorrelation trace as $\Delta\lambda_{\mathrm{f}}$ = 0; inset, zoom-in of the CW state.

Figure 4

Figure 4 SNR of the grating filter at different center wavelengths.

Figure 5

Figure 5 Experimental results. (a) Spectrum. (b) Autocorrelation trace; inset, the intensity profile of the output laser beam. (c) Pulse train. (d) RF spectrum.

Figure 6

Figure 6 Power stability measurement of the mode-locked MO within 3 hours.