Figure 5 of the published paper should be replaced by the figure shown below. The comparison between Figures 5 and 6 illustrates the important distinction between regimes II and III, with the formation of a Landau–Levich–Derjaguin film (figure 6) once the capillary number is sufficiently large.
Figure 5. (Corrected) Time evolution of the interface for
$Ca=0.029$
in regime II. (a) Corresponds to
$t=200$
, and the time difference between successive panels is
${\rm\Delta}t=200$
, where time is scaled by
${\it\mu}_{1}\ell _{c}/{\it\sigma}$
and the same dimensionless time is used in the following figures. The lower fluid is coloured by the value of the vertical velocity
$v/U$
to indicate the gravity-driven flow. The flow in the upper fluid is not shown for clarity.
