Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:57:47.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Near Defect Free GaN Substrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

S. Porowski*
Affiliation:
High Pressure Research Center, Polish Academy of Sciences, Sokolowska 29/37, 01-142 Warsaw, Poland, sylvek@unipress.waw.pl

Abstract

The current status of GaN crystallization under high nitrogen pressure will be presented. Both conductive and semi-insulating GaN crystals will be characterized.

In particular the influence of Mg on the growth mechanisms will be discussed. The influence of Mg doping on morphology of Mg-doped crystals grown under pressure and Mg-doped homoepitaxial layers will be shown. It will be also shown that the addition of about 1 at.% of Mg into the solution improves significantly the structural quality of crystals reducing dislocation density at least by 3 orders of magnitude comparing to the crystals grown without an intentional doping. As it was estimated by selective wet etching and transmission electron microscopy the dislocation densities in the Mg-doped GaN is as low as 10 cm−1. The introduction of Mg also lowers the optical absorption coefficients for energies below fundamental edge by 2 to 3 orders of magnitude what is explained by disappearance of defect related states in the gap.

The procedures for preparation of atomically flat epi-ready (000 1 ) surfaces without subsurface damage will be described. It will be shown that high quality homoepitaxial layers growing by monoatomic steps are possible on these substrates.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 Materials Research Society

Introduction

The technology of GaN and its ternaries, GaAlN and GaInN is of crucial importance for blue optoelectronic devices. Progress in technology and basic research of GaN led to development of blue [Reference Nakamura, Senoh and Mukai1], green and yellow [Reference Nakamura, Senoh, Iwasa and Nagahama2] light emitting diodes (LEDs), which are now commercially available from a number of sources. Also the low power laser diodes have been announced [Reference Nakamura, Senoh, Nagahama, Iwasa, Yamada, Matsushita, Kiyoku and Sugimoto3]. Still the stability and power of laser diodes are not satisfactory.

These results have been achieved using either sapphire or SiC substrates. Further progress can be attained by either developing more sophisticated layer growth techniques such as epitaxial lateral overgrowth (ELOG) or by developing GaN substrates. Essentially both methods rely on the same phenomenon, i.e. enforcing fast growth along (1010) direction in order to obtain large area substrate having reduced dislocation density. Due to absence of destabilizing factor of contact with the foreign substrate, the growth of single crystals is more promising technique.

Growth of GaN single crystals have been subject of the research for several years [Reference Porowski4,Reference Porowski and Grzegory5]. Using High Pressure Solution Growth (HPSG) method 100 mm2 size GaN plate-like single crystals of good crystallographic quality have been obtained. Both n-type and semiinsulating (SI) crystals have been grown [6]. Also GaN surface preparation techniques have been developed, which include mechano-chemical polishing for active (N face) surface [Reference Weyher, Müller, Grzegory and Porowski7] of GaN platelets and Reactive Ion Etching (RIE) for inert (Ga face) surface.

GaN single crystal substrates were successfully used for MBE and MOCVD epitaxial growth. Homoepitaxial layers of very good crystallographic quality, resulting from good quality of the substrate and undisturbed epitaxial growth by flow of monoatomic steps. Recently, the dislocation-free multiquantum well (MQW) structures have been obtained.

In this paper we will discuss recent development of the growth of GaN single crystals. First the thermodynamic conditions for the growth of GaN crystals from the constituents: liquid Ga and N2 under high pressure will be obtained. Then the physical properties, including crystallographic, optical and electric will be discussed. Subsequently the results of surface preparation techniques to GaN single crystals will be illustrated by results of microscopic and structural investigations. Finally the results of epitaxy both by MOCVD and MBE will be discussed.

Physical Properties of Ga(1)-N2-GaN System and GaN Crystal Growth

Thermodynamic and kinetic properties of Ga(1)-N2-GaN(s) system are determined mostly by strong bonding both in N2 molecule and in GaN crystal. The transition between the initial state of liquid gallium and nitrogen N2 and GaN crystal requires breaking the extremely strong bonding in N2 molecule (bond energy 9.8 eV/molecule) and creation of GaN bonds. Strong bonding in GaN crystal (bond energy (9.32 eV/atom pair) leads to high melting temperature TMGaN ∼ 2800 K [Reference Van Vetchten8]. The estimated N2 equilibrium pressure for GaN is over 45 kbar [Reference Karpinski, Jun and Porowski9]. Such pressures and temperatures are not accessible to present day crystal growth apparatus making necessary use of lower temperatures and lower nitrogen pressures. At present the large volume high gas pressure apparatus allows to obtain the nitrogen pressures up to 20 kbar.

It is believed that GaN grows from nitrogen solution in liquid Ga. Thus the synthesis of GaN consists of several stages:

  1. i/ adsorption of N2 on liquid Ga surface

  2. ii/ dissolution of nitrogen in liquid Ga and its diffusion to the cold zone

  3. iii/ growth from solution

Recent quantum mechanical calculations have shown that adsorption of N2 on liquid Ga surface leads to dissociation of N2 molecule [Reference Kurkowski, Romanowski, Grzegory and Porowski11]. The energy barrier for this process is of the order of 4.2 eV which is less than half of the N2 bonding energy. This indicates that the bonding between Ga and N atoms plays important role in the process. The estimate of the rate of the adsorption indicates that this process is not the rate limiting process in GaN crystallization at high pressures [Reference Porowski, Grzegory and Krukowski6].

As it can be seen from Figure 1 nitrogen pressure about 20 kbar corresponds to nitrogen solubility in liquid gallium of the order of 1%. Lower temperatures correspond to lower nitrogen solubility, therefore by controlling the temperature difference in the crucible we can control the difference of the nitrogen concentration and accordingly the supersaturation in the growth zone. Our growth results suggest that the nitrogen solubility and diffusion from the hot to cold zone of the gallium is the rate limiting step in the growth.

Fig 1. N2(g) - Ga(1) - GaN(s) phase diagram: a - p-T coordinates [Reference Karpinski, Jun and Porowski9]; b - x-T coordinates [Reference Grzegory, Jun, Bockowski, Krukowski, Wroblewski, Lucznik, Krukowski and Porowski10]

Due to relatively rapid dissolution of nitrogen in liquid Ga, in the beginning of the process GaN polycrystalline crust is created on the Ga surface. Some of the crust GaN crystals grow faster and inhibit the growth of neighboring crystals. Depending on the supersaturation and the temperature the two growth habits are obtained: needle-like habit which dominates for large supersaturation (large temperature difference ) and plate-like habit which is prevalent for lower supersaturations (small temperature gradient in the crucible).

It has been found that morphology and quality of the GaN crystals depend crucially on the doping of growth solution. The morphology of the two principal surfaces of GaN platelets is different: one side is completely flat and the other is corrugated, with large number of multi-atomic steps, ridges and even growth hillocks. For undoped Ga solution the corrugated surface correspond to Ga face ((000

) face) and the flat surface to N face (0001) [Reference Liliental-Weber, Kisielowski, Ruvimov, Chen, Washburn, Grzegory, Bockowski, Jun and Porowski12,Reference Rouviere, Weyher, Seelmann-Eggebert and Porowski13]. The addition of Mg to liquid Ga changes the morphology of the plate - Ga face becomes completely flat and N face is corrugated [Reference Porowski, Grzegory and Krukowski6]. Also the electric and optical properties are different - Mg doped crystal have very low concentration of free carriers and at room temperature these crystals are semiinsulating [Reference Porowski, Grzegory and Krukowski6].

High concentration of free electrons in GaN grown from undoped Ga is attributed either to nitrogen vacancies [Reference Maruska and Tjetjen14] or to oxygen substitutional impurity [Reference Seifert, Franzheld, Butter, Sobotta and Riede15]. The incorporation of oxygen is related to its dissolution in liquid metal. This process has been investigated using quantum mechanical calculations. The results have been obtained using commercially available Dmol package distributed by Molecular Simulation Inc. within countrywide license in Poland [Reference Delley16] results of these calculations have been shown in Figure 2. In Figure 2a the excess energy of the oxygen molecule approaching the liquid metal group III surface is shown. As it can be seen, the adsorption of oxygen on liquid metal surface is barrierless process. This type of the adsorption energy curve is standard for the molecular adsorption. The nature of oxygen adsorption is different - the O2 molecule disintegrates on the surface. On Figure 2 b the spacing between the oxygen atoms is presented as a function of the distance between the molecule and the metal surface. As it can be seen the distance between the oxygen atoms rapidly increases from 1.53 to above 3Å. This proves that adsorption leads to dissociation of oxygen molecule on the metal surface. Moreover, the barrierless character of the process indicates that the incorporation of oxygen is very efficient and that liquid gallium absorbs all oxygen from gaseous nitrogen.

Fig. 2. Interaction between O2 molecule and metal III group surface: a - excess energy, b - O - O distance in oxygen molecule dependence on the distance between the molecule and the metal surface.

The main problem in growth of high quality crystals is how to attain high growth rate and preserve the morphological stability of the surface. The growth rate can be increased either by higher equilibrium concentration of N in liquid Ga or by increase of the supersaturation. In our growth method we keep the supersaturation at the lowest possible level and increase the solubility by increasing the temperature of the liquid gallium. This leads to the increase of the growth rate and reduction of the destabilizing factor of high supersaturation The destabilizing influence of impurities is also reduced by preserving high purity of the process. This is achieved by initial annealing of the high pressure vessel in the temperature of 200°C and vacuum of 10−3 Torr.

The improvement of the growth procedure led to considerable progress of GaN high pressure growth which is illustrated in Figure 3. The typical size of the undoped GaN crystal, obtained in 200h growth process is above 15 mm in length with the surface area above 100 mm2.

The size of Mg - doped GaN crystals obtained in the process of the same duration is about 10 mm with the area of 80 mm2. The size difference is related to reduction of the growth rate in the plane perpendicular to c axis for Mg-doped GaN crystals.

Fig. 3 Progress in GaN high pressure crystallization - increase of the size of GaN crystals in last 3 years,

Physical Properties of Pressure Grown GaN Crystals

The HPSG method allows to grow both conductive and non-conductive crystals of GaN. The electrical properties depend on the solvent used for crystallization. As it is summarized in Fig. 4, GaN crystals grown from solutions in pure Ga, without an intentional doping, are highly conductive with Fermi level lying in the conduction band. The growth from solutions in Ga alloyed with small amount of Mg results in highly resistive crystals with Fermi level shifted into the gap. Fig. 5 shows temperature dependence of resistivity [Reference Litwin-Staszewska17] for both types of crystals. It allows to compare the type of conductivity in undoped and Mg-doped crystals.

Fig. 4 Electric properties and morphology of GaN crystals: I - undoped, II - Mg - doped.

Fig. 5 Temperature dependence of resistivity of undoped and Mg-doped GaN crystals

GaN crystals grown from the solutions in pure gallium show metallic behavior in whole temperature range of 4.2 - 300K. High free electron concentration of 3-6 × 1019 cm−3 with mobilities of 30-90 cm2/Vs [Reference Perlin, Camassel, Knap, Talercio, Chevrin, Suski, Grzegory and Porowski18, Reference Litwin-Staszewska17]] have been found (Table I). The main residual impurity detected in the crystals by SIMS [Reference Barcz and Suski19] is oxygen. Its concentration was estimated to be in the range of 1018 - 1019 cm−3. It is well established that oxygen is a single donor in GaN. However since the concentration of free electrons in the crystals is higher than the estimated concentration of the impurity the presence of an additional donor cannot be excluded. The N-vacancy as the additional source of free electrons is therefore often proposed [Reference Boguslawski, Briggs and Bernholz20,Reference Wook Kim, Botchkarev, Salvador, Popovici and Morkoc21].

Following the theory [Reference Boguslawski, Briggs and Bernholz20,Reference Neugebauer and Walle22], highly probable native defects in GaN crystals which are highly n-type, are Ga-vacancies (VGa 3−). This is due to their low formation energy even at strongly Ga-rich conditions of crystallization. The presence of the negatively charged Ga vacancies at concentrations of 1018 cm−3 , in the n-type pressure grown GaN crystals, has been detected by positron annihilation experiments [Reference Saarinen, Laine, Kuisma, Hautojarvi, Dobrzyñski, Baranowski, Paku, Stê pniewski, Wojdak, Wysmo, Suski, Leszczyñski, Grzegory and Porowski23].

The addition of Mg into the growth solution drastically changes the electrical properties of GaN crystals. Their RT resistivity increases by orders of magnitude (Table I).

Table I Electrical properties of GaN crystals

crystal conductivity typeρ Ωcm, 300K carrier concentration,cm−3
GaNe metallice 10−310−2- 3−6 × 1019, n-type
GaN : Mg hopping 104−106 ----

The increase of electrical resistance in GaN:Mg crystals is related to drastic decrease of free electron concentration. The temperature dependence of resistivity for these samples at low temperatures up to about 250K, suggests hopping type of conductivity. At higher temperatures the conductivity starts to be governed by the activation process leading to the creation of free holes in the valence band.

Also the optical absorption data [Reference Porowski, Bockowski, Lucznik, Grzegory, Wroblewski, Teisseyre, Leszczynski, Litwin-Staszewska, Suski, Trautman, Pakula and Baranowski24] indicate that the free carrier concentration in the Mg-doped GaN is very low. The free carrier absorption which dominates the low energy part of the absorption spectra for the undoped GaN disappears completely for crystals grown from Mg containing solutions. For these crystals, the absorption coefficients for energies below the fundamental absorption edge are as low as 1-10 cm−1 as measured by Photothermal Deflection Spectroscopy . [Reference Suski and Ambacher25].

The Mg impurity introduced into the growth solution does not change significantly the general habit of the crystals. In both cases they are hexagonal platelets with c-axis perpendicular to the hexagonal faces. Typical crystals of both types are shown in Fig. 6. The crystals with Mg are perfectly transparent and colorless whereas the conductive samples are usually slightly yellowish in color.

Fig 6 GaN undoped (top) and Mg-doped (bottom) single crystals. (grid spacing - 1mm).

From the form of the crystals, it follows that the relative growth rates in directions perpendicular and parallel to the c-axis are similar however the crystals with Mg are generally thicker and require longer time to reach the same linear dimensions as the crystals grown without Mg.

One of the hexagonal faces of both types of crystals is usually flat. The opposite one often shows some macro-roughness (i.e. macrosteps) as a consequence of the unstable growth in one of the (0001) directions. As it was revealed [Reference Grzegory26] by wet etching [Reference Weyher, Müller, Grzegory and Porowski7] and confirmed by CBED measurements [Reference Liliental-Weber, Kisielowski, Ruvimov, Chen, Washburn, Grzegory, Bockowski, Jun and Porowski12, Reference Rouviere, Weyher, Seelmann-Eggebert and Porowski13], the flat surfaces of the conductive and non-conductive crystals correspond to opposite polar (0001) orientations of GaN.

For conductive GaN crystals the flat surface is always (0001)N face which is chemically active [Reference Weyher, Müller, Grzegory and Porowski7]. For the Mg-doped crystals this is always (0001)Ga face which is resistant to the wet etching in alkali water solutions.

The GaN crystals grown by HPSG method are of high structural quality as determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD) [Reference Leszczynski, Grzegory, Teisseyre, Suski, Bockowski, Jun, Baranowski, Porowski and Domagala27], transmission electron microscopy (TEM) [Reference Liliental-Weber, Kisielowski, Ruvimov, Chen, Washburn, Grzegory, Bockowski, Jun and Porowski12, Reference Albrecht28] and defect selective wet etching (etch pit density - EPD) techniques. The XRD data are summarized in Fig. 7. The X-ray rocking curves for symmetrical reflection are as narrow as 18-25 arcsec for almost all Mg-doped crystals and for best crystals grown without doping. For some of the conductive crystals the rocking curves splits onto few peaks indicating low angle (about 1 arcmin) grain boundaries. This is probably due to some inhomogeneity in distribution of residual donor impurities. The rocking curves for in-plane reflections are always very narrow what indicates that there is no twist mosaicity in all investigated crystals.

Fig.7 Fig.7 x-ray rocking curves of pressure GaN crystals

A number of GaN crystals have been studied by TEM [Reference Liliental-Weber, Kisielowski, Ruvimov, Chen, Washburn, Grzegory, Bockowski, Jun and Porowski12,Reference Rouviere, Weyher, Seelmann-Eggebert and Porowski13,Reference Albrecht28] especially the samples used for optimization of surface preparation procedures and epitaxial growth of layers and structures. In most observations the crystals were completely free of dislocations. Fig. 8 shows a 3 μm. TEM cross-sectional view [Reference Albrecht28] of the GaN conductive crystal with GaN/AlGaN structure grown by MBE [Reference Porowski, Grzegory, Bockowski, Leszczynski, Korakakis, Bell, Harrison, Foxon, Albrecht, Strunk, Davidson and Dawson29] on the active (0001)N surface. In this measurement no dislocations have been found over 100 μm. area. It suggests that the dislocation density in the crystal is not higher than 104 cm−2.

Fig. 8 TEM crossectional view of MQW structure grown on GaN substrate. Courtesy of M. Albrecht .

It was mentioned earlier that the Ga-side of GaN cannot be etched in alkali water solutions. However if molten KOH, NaOH or their molten eutectic are applied the defect selective etching of GaN heteroepitaxial layers and single crystals is possible. The method developed for GaN heteroepitaxial layers [Reference Weyher, Müller, Grzegory and Porowski7] has been applied to pressure grown GaN crystals doped with Mg. The number of the etch pits on heteroepitaxial GaN corresponded to defect density of 2 × 108 cm−2 whereas only very few such a pits have been found on the whole surface (few tens of mm2) of GaN single crystal.

The estimations for dislocation density in pressure grown GaN crystals are summarized in Table II.

Table II Dislocation density in pressure grown GaN crystals

Type of crystal Dislocation density, cm−2
GaN, undoped,conductive 104
GaN:Mg, non-conductive 101 - 102

Surface Preparation

The surfaces of the pressure grown GaN crystals are often covered by the growth figures or surface layer resulting from the cooling of the system after crystallization at high temperature. Therefore to obtain epi-ready surfaces of GaN substrates it is necessary to subject them to the preparation procedures prior to epitaxial growth.

The mechanical polishing with diamond micropowders leads to the formation of highly damaged surfaces with scratches of 200 Å in depth. The thickness of the damaged layer under such mechanically polished surfaces is usually 2000 - 2500Å as it was shown by the RBS measurements [Reference Conway, Williams and Jagadish30] (Fig. 9).

It was shown that bulk GaN crystals (highly conductive, undoped) can be etched in aqueous solutions (10N - 1N) of KOH and NaOH [Reference Weyher, Müller, Grzegory and Porowski7]. However only one of the polar {0001} surfaces of bulk crystals is attacked by the applied etchants. The free etching of this surface (000

)N as it was identified by XPD [Reference Rouviere, Weyher, Seelmann-Eggebert and Porowski13]) is strongly anisotropic and results in the formation of numerous stable pyramids 100 - 200nm in height. As it was mentioned before for Mgdoped crystals also the (000
)N.face is chemically active.

The same aqueous solutions (10N - 1N) of KOH and NaOH have been used for mechano-chemical polishing of the chemically active GaN surface [Reference Weyher, Müller, Grzegory and Porowski7]. When the mechano-chemical polishing procedure is applied, atomically flat surfaces of bulk GaN (RMS=0.1nm as estimated by AFM) are reproducibly obtained. The RBS measurements [Reference Conway, Williams and Jagadish30] (Fig.9) indicate that the applied procedure allows to remove the subsurface damage resulting from the mechanical polishing. It was confirmed by TEM studies of subsurface regions of mechano-chemically polished GaN crystals. One of the cross sectional TEM views of such a crystal is shown in Fig. 10.

Fig.10 Cross sectional TEM view of GaN crystal at the mechano-chemically polished surface. The insert shows CBED spectra used for polarity determination.

The procedures of the wet etching and mechano-chemical polishing with alkaline water solutions can be also applied for GaN heteroepitaxial layers but only to that which shows tendency to develop hexagonal hillocks if grown by MOCVD. The orientation of this chemically active epitaxial GaN layers is the same as the orientation of chemically active surface of the conductive GaN crystals.

The surfaces of GaN crystals corresponding to the Ga-polarity faces cannot be prepared by the methods just described due to their chemical resistance to most chemicals, at room temperature. Therefore for these surfaces, the Reactive Ion Etching techniques are used for removing the subsurface damage introduced by the mechanical polishing. The application of RIE allows to remove the subsurface damage what was shown by TEM [Reference Albrecht28]. Some roughness remaining after the RIE treatment is usually removed at the first stages of epitaxial growth.

Homoepitaxy

Epitaxial growth of GaN layers and GaN-based structure was tried on both polar surfaces of pressure grown GaN crystals, by MOCVD [Reference Pakula, Wysmolek, Korona, Baranowski, Stepniewski, Grzegory, Bockowski, Jun, Krukowski and Porowski31, Reference Schauler, Eberhardt, Kirchner, Schweigler, Kamp and Ebeling32, Reference Beaumont33, Reference Zauner34,] as well as by MBE with plasma [Reference Porowski, Grzegory, Bockowski, Leszczynski, Korakakis, Bell, Harrison, Foxon, Albrecht, Strunk, Davidson and Dawson29] and ammonia [Reference Held, Nowak, Cohen and Porowski35] nitrogen sources.

The growth by propagation of monoatomic steps has been achieved by both methods on both polar surfaces. Fig. 11 shows the morphology of GaN homoepitaxial layer grown by MBE with NH3 nitrogen source [gn] on the (000

)N prepared by mechano-chemical polishing. Such a sequence of atomic steps usually covers whole surface of GaN substrate. The only exception are the layers grown by MOCVD on (000
)N oriented substrates where the hexagonal growth hillocks are often observed. The origin of this morphological features was investigated by Weyher et al. [Reference Weyher, Brown, Zauner, Müller, Foord, Hageman, Humphreys, Larsen, Grzegory and Porowski36].

Fig. 11 AFM scans of GaN homoepitaxial layer grown on the active side of GaN crystal by MBE with ammonia N source [Reference Held, Nowak, Cohen and Porowski35]

On the other hand, the growth on the active, (000

)N surface by MBE with both NH3 and plasma N-source results in smooth step flow morphology and almost perfect interfaces between the substrates and deposited layers. Sometimes some light element (probably oxygen) contaminant was found at the interface however it did not disturb the sequence of atomic planes as it was revealed by HREM [Reference Albrecht28]. It shows that the active surface of GaN is more sensitive to contamination’s which often results in enhanced incorporation of impurities during epitaxy in comparison to the inert surface of the GaN substrates [Reference Leszczynski, Prystawko, Sliwinski, Suski, Litwin-Staszewska and Porowski37].

Probably also due to this reason the best photoluminescence spectra were obtained for layers deposited on the inert, Ga-side of GaN substrates [Reference Schauler, Eberhardt, Kirchner, Schweigler, Kamp and Ebeling32, Reference Beaumont33].

The donor bound exciton lines of the halfwidth below 0.5 meV have been measured on homoepitaxial GaN layers [Reference Schauler, Eberhardt, Kirchner, Schweigler, Kamp and Ebeling32]. This confirms the good quality of homoepitaxial layers, resulting in the absence of the strain and extremely narrow excitonic lines.

The GaAlN/GaN multiquantum well (MQW) structures have been obtained using mechano-chemical (000

) surface preparation technique and plasma enhanced MBE growth method [Reference Porowski, Grzegory, Bockowski, Leszczynski, Korakakis, Bell, Harrison, Foxon, Albrecht, Strunk, Davidson and Dawson29]. The results of TEM measurements indicate that the dislocation free area of the MQW extends over the range of 100 μm. [Reference Albrecht28]. This also indicates on very good crystallographic quality of the substrate surface

Conclusions

The results presented in this paper can be summarized by the following points:

  1. 1. Two types of GaN single crystals were obtained by HPSG method

    1. a/ conductive - undoped Ga

      • - max size - 18 mm

      • - dislocation density ∼ 104 cm−1

    2. b/ SI - Mg doped Ga

      • - max size - 14 mm

      • - dislocation density ∼ 101 − 102 cm−2

  2. 2. Surface preparation methods were developed

    1. a/ (0001)N - mechanochemical polishing

    2. b/ (0001)Ga - reactive ion etching

  3. 3. Atomic height step flow growth mode was achieved by MOCVD and MBE methods

  4. 4. Near dislocation-free epitaxial layers and MQW structures were grown by both MBE and MOCVD techniques.

Acknowledgments

The research presented in this paper has been supported by Poland’s Committee for Scientific Research grant no 7 7834 95 C/2399. The quantum mechanical calculations have been made using Dmol software distributed by MSI Inc. in the framework of countrywide license supported by Committee for Scientific Research.

References

Nakamura, S., Senoh, M., Mukai, T., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2, Lett. 32, L8 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, S., Senoh, M. , Iwasa, N., Nagahama, S., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2, Lett. 34 L797 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, S., Senoh, M., Nagahama, S., Iwasa, N., Yamada, T., Matsushita, T., Kiyoku, H., Sugimoto, Y., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.2, Lett. 35, L74 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porowski, S., Mater. Sci. Eng. B44, 407 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porowski, S., Grzegory, I., J. Cryst. Growth 178, 174 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porowski, S., Grzegory, I., Krukowski, S., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Google Scholar
Weyher, J. L., Müller, S., Grzegory, I., Porowski, S., J. Cryst. Growth 182, 17 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Vetchten, J. A., Phys. Rev. B7 1479 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpinski, J., Jun, J. and Porowski, S., J. Cryst. Growth 66 1(1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grzegory, I., Jun, J., Bockowski, M., Krukowski, S., Wroblewski, M., Lucznik, B. and Krukowski, S. Porowski, S., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 56, 639 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurkowski, S., Romanowski, Z., Grzegory, I., Porowski, S., J. Cryst. Growth 189/190, 159 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liliental-Weber, Z., Kisielowski, C., Ruvimov, , Chen, I., Washburn, J., Grzegory, I., Bockowski, M., Jun, J., Porowski, S.,. J. Electron. Mater. 25 1545(1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouviere, J-L., Weyher, J. L., Seelmann-Eggebert, M., Porowski, S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 668(1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maruska, H.P., Tjetjen, J.J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 15 (1969) 327 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seifert, W., Franzheld, R., Butter, E., Sobotta, H., Riede, V., Cryst. Res. & Technol. 18 (1983) 383 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delley, B., J. Chem. Phys. 92, 508 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litwin-Staszewska, E., to be publishedGoogle Scholar
Perlin, P., Camassel, J., Knap, W., Talercio, T., Chevrin, J. C., Suski, T., Grzegory, I. and Porowski, S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 2524 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barcz, A., Suski, T., unpublishedGoogle Scholar
Boguslawski, P., Briggs, E. and Bernholz, J., Phys. Rev. B51, 17255, (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wook Kim, A. E., Botchkarev, A., Salvador, G., Popovici, H. Tang and Morkoc, H., J. Appl. Phys. 82 (1), 1997 Google Scholar
Neugebauer, J. and Walle, C. G. Van de, Phys. Rev. B50, 8067, (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saarinen, K., Laine, T., Kuisma, S., Hautojarvi, P., Dobrzyñski, L., Baranowski, J. M., Paku, K., Stê pniewski, R., Wojdak, M., Wysmo, A., Suski, T., Leszczyñski, M., Grzegory, I. and Porowski, S., Phys. Rev Lett. 79, 3030, (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porowski, S., Bockowski, M., Lucznik, B., Grzegory, I., Wroblewski, M., Teisseyre, H., Leszczynski, M., Litwin-Staszewska, E., Suski, T., Trautman, P., Pakula, K. and Baranowski, J.M., accepted for Acta Physica Polonica, 1997 Google Scholar
Suski, T., Ambacher, O., private communicationGoogle Scholar
Grzegory, I., private communicationGoogle Scholar
Leszczynski, M., Grzegory, I., Teisseyre, H., Suski, T., Bockowski, M., Jun, J., Baranowski, J.M., Porowski, S., Domagala, J., J. Cryst. Growth 169, 235 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albrecht, M., private communicationGoogle Scholar
Porowski, S., Grzegory, I., Bockowski, M., Leszczynski, M., Korakakis, D, Bell, A., Harrison, I., Foxon, C. T., Albrecht, M., Strunk, H. P., Davidson, J. A., Dawson, P., presented inGoogle Scholar
Conway, M., Williams, J. S. and Jagadish, C., private communicationGoogle Scholar
Pakula, K., Wysmolek, A., Korona, K. P., Baranowski, J. M., Stepniewski, R., Grzegory, I., Bockowski, M., Jun, J., Krukowski, S. and Porowski, S., Solid State Commun. 97, 919 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schauler, M., Eberhardt, F., Kirchner, C., Schweigler, V., Kamp, M., Ebeling, K.J., to be publishedGoogle Scholar
Beaumont, P., to be publishedGoogle Scholar
Zauner, A., to be publishedGoogle Scholar
Held, R., Nowak, G., Cohen, P., Porowski, S., to be publishedGoogle Scholar
Weyher, J. L., Brown, P. D., Zauner, A., Müller, S., Foord, D., Hageman, P. R., Humphreys, C. J., Larsen, P., Grzegory, I., Porowski, S., to be publishedGoogle Scholar
Leszczynski, M., Prystawko, P., Sliwinski, A., Suski, T., Litwin-Staszewska, E., Porowski, S., Acta Phys. Pol. A 94, 427 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig 1. N2(g) - Ga(1) - GaN(s) phase diagram: a - p-T coordinates [9]; b - x-T coordinates [10]

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Interaction between O2 molecule and metal III group surface: a - excess energy, b - O - O distance in oxygen molecule dependence on the distance between the molecule and the metal surface.

Figure 2

Fig. 3 Progress in GaN high pressure crystallization - increase of the size of GaN crystals in last 3 years,

Figure 3

Fig. 4 Electric properties and morphology of GaN crystals: I - undoped, II - Mg - doped.

Figure 4

Fig. 5 Temperature dependence of resistivity of undoped and Mg-doped GaN crystals

Figure 5

Table I Electrical properties of GaN crystals

Figure 6

Fig 6 GaN undoped (top) and Mg-doped (bottom) single crystals. (grid spacing - 1mm).

Figure 7

Fig.7 Fig.7 x-ray rocking curves of pressure GaN crystals

Figure 8

Fig. 8 TEM crossectional view of MQW structure grown on GaN substrate. Courtesy of M. Albrecht .

Figure 9

Table II Dislocation density in pressure grown GaN crystals

Figure 10

Fig. 9 RBS signals for polished GaN surfaces, Ref. 12

Figure 11

Fig.10 Cross sectional TEM view of GaN crystal at the mechano-chemically polished surface. The insert shows CBED spectra used for polarity determination.

Figure 12

Fig. 11 AFM scans of GaN homoepitaxial layer grown on the active side of GaN crystal by MBE with ammonia N source [35]