Book contents
- Custom and Its Interpretation in International Investment Law
- The Rules of Interpretation of Customary International Law
- Custom and Its Interpretation in International Investment Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword: Custom and International Investment Law
- Table of Cases
- Table of International Treaties, Documents & National Legislation
- Abbreviations
- Part I Identifying Custom in International Investment Law
- Part II The Interpretation of Secondary Rules in International Investment Law
- Part III Interpreting Customary International Rules
- Part IV Concluding Thoughts
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 January 2024
Edited in association with
Book contents
- Custom and Its Interpretation in International Investment Law
- The Rules of Interpretation of Customary International Law
- Custom and Its Interpretation in International Investment Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword: Custom and International Investment Law
- Table of Cases
- Table of International Treaties, Documents & National Legislation
- Abbreviations
- Part I Identifying Custom in International Investment Law
- Part II The Interpretation of Secondary Rules in International Investment Law
- Part III Interpreting Customary International Rules
- Part IV Concluding Thoughts
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Custom and its Interpretation in International Investment Law , pp. 346 - 373Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
- Creative Commons
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/
References
Primary Sources
Aldrich, G, The Jurisprudence of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal (Clarendon 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alschner, W, Investment Arbitration and State-Driven Reform, New Treaties, Old Outcomes (OUP 2022)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Law Institute, Restatement (Second) of Foreign Relations Law (American Law Institute 1965)Google Scholar
American Law Institute, Restatement (Third) of Foreign Relations Law (American Law Institute 1987)Google Scholar
Balcerzak, F, Investor–State Arbitration and Human Rights (Brill Nijhoff 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlia, G, Essai sur la Portée de la Clause de Jugement en Équité en Droit des Gens (Université de Paris 1937)Google Scholar
Bianchi, A, International Law Theories: An Inquiry into Different Ways of Thinking (OUP 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackaby, N, Partasides, C, Redfern, A & ors, Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration (OUP 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnitcha, J, Skovgaard Poulsen, LN & Waibel, M, The Political Economy of the Investment Treaty Regime (OUP 2017)Google Scholar
Boyle, A & Redgwell, C (eds), Birnie, Boyle, and Redgwell’s International Law and the Environment (4th edn, OUP 2021)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, M, Custom, Power and the Power of Rules: International Relations and Customary International Law (CUP 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caron, D & Caplan, L, The UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules: A Commentary (2nd edn, OUP 2013)Google Scholar
Cheng, B, General Principles of Law: As Applied by International Courts and Tribunals (Stevens 1953)Google Scholar
Cheng, B, General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals (reprinted, CUP 1987)Google Scholar
Corten, O & Klein, P (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (OUP 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, J, The International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility: Introduction, Text and Commentaries (CUP 2002)Google Scholar
Crawford, J, Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (9th edn, OUP 2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Brabandere, E, Investment Treaty Arbitration as Public International Law (CUP 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Degan, VD, L’interprétation des accords en droit international (Martinus Nijhoff 1963)Google Scholar
Diehl, A, The Core Standard of International Investment Protection: Fair and Equitable Treatment (Kluwer 2012)Google Scholar
Dolzer, R & Schreuer, C, Principles of International Investment Law (2nd edn, OUP 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörr, O & Schmalenbach, K (eds), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (2nd edn, Springer 2018)Google Scholar
Đorđeska, M, General Principles of Law Recognized by Civilized Nations (1922–2018): The Evolution of the Third Source of International Law through the Jurisprudence of the Permanent Court of International Justice and the International Court of Justice (Brill 2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumberry, P, The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard: A Guide to NAFTA Case Law on Article 1105 (Kluwer 2013)Google Scholar
Dumberry, P, The Formation and Identification of Rules of Customary International Law in International Investment Law (CUP 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Amador, FV, Sohn, LB & Baxter, RR, Recent Codification of the Law of State Responsibility for Injuries to Aliens (Oceana 1974)Google Scholar
General Claims Commission (US & Mexico), Opinions of Commissioners Under the Convention Concluded on 8 September 1923 Between the United States and Mexico, Vol 1 (US GPO 1927)Google Scholar
Gore, KN & Shirlow, E (eds), The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties in Investor-State Disputes: History, Evolution, and Future (Kluwer 2022)Google Scholar
Gourgourinis, A, Equity and Equitable Principles in the World Trade Organization (Routledge 2016)Google Scholar
Grotius, H, The Rights of War and Peace (first published 1625, Tuck, Richard ed, Liberty Fund 2005)Google Scholar
Habicht, M, Post-War Treaties for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes (HUP 1931)Google Scholar
Habicht, M, Analysis of the Treaties in Post-War Treaties for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes, Part II (HUP 1931)Google Scholar
Heffter, A, Le Droit International Public de l’Europe (first published 1844, Bergson J tr, 3rd edn, Cotillon Libraires 1873)Google Scholar
Henckels, C, Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration: Balancing Investment Protection and Regulatory Autonomy (CUP 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard-Jones, N, The Scientific Background of the International Sanitary Conferences 1851–1938 (WHO 1975)Google Scholar
Hudson, MO, The Permanent Court of International Justice, 1920–1942: A Treatise (Macmillan 1943)Google Scholar
Hull, IV, A Scrap of Paper: Breaking and Making International Law During the Great War (Cornell University Press 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishikawa, T, The Role of International Environmental Principles in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Precautionary and Polluter Pays Principles and Partial Compensation (Brill 2016)Google Scholar
Jennings, J & Watts, A (eds), Oppenheim’s International Law, Vol 1 (9th edn, OUP 2008)Google Scholar
Kantor, M, Valuation for Arbitration: Compensation Standards, Valuation Methods and Expert Evidence (Kluwer 2008)Google Scholar
Kinnear, M, Biorklund, A & Hannaford, JFG, Investment Disputes Under NAFTA: An Annotated Guide to NAFTA Chapter 11 (Kluwer Law 2006)Google Scholar
Kokott, J, The Burden of Proof in Comparative and Human Rights Law: Civil and Common Law Approaches with Special Reference to the American and German Legal Systems (Kluwer Law International 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolb, R, La bonne foi en droit international public: Contribution à l’ étude des principes généraux de droit (Graduate Institute Publications 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, M, The Gentle Civilizer: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960 (CUP 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotuby, CT & Sobota, LA, General Principles of Law and International Due Process: Principles and Norms Applicable in Transnational Disputes (OUP 2017)Google Scholar
Kurkela, M & Turunen, S, Due Process in International Commercial Arbitration (OUP 2010)Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H, Private Law Sources and Analogies of International Law (Longmans 1927)Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H, The Development of International Law by the International Court (Stevens & Sons 1958)Google Scholar
Laviec, JP, Protection et promotion des investissements, étude de droit international économique (PUF 1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linarelli, J, Salomon, ME & Sornarajah, M, The Misery of International Law: Confrontations with Injustice in the Global Economy (OUP 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linderfalk, U, On the Interpretation of Treaties: The Modern International Law as Expressed in the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Springer 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López Cárdenas, CM, La desaparición forzada de personas en perspectiva histórico jurídica: su origen y evolución en el ámbito internacional (Editorial Universidad del Rosario 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, R, Romano, C & Shany, Y (eds), The Manual on International Courts and Tribunals (2nd edn, OUP 2010)Google Scholar
Manning, WR (ed), Diplomatic Correspondence of the United States: Canadian Relations, Vol 3 (Carnegie Endowment 1943)Google Scholar
Marboe, I, Calculation of Compensation and Damages in International Investment Law (2nd edn, OUP 2017)Google Scholar
McLachlan, C, Shore, L & Weiniger, M, International Investment Arbitration: Substantive Principles (OUP 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLachlan, C, Shore, L & Weiniger, M, International Investment Arbitration: Substantive Principles (2nd edn, OUP 2017)Google Scholar
Merkouris, P, Article 31(3)(c) VCLT and the Principle of Systemic Integration: Normative Shadows in Plato’s Cave (Brill 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merkouris, P, Interpretation of Customary International Law: Of Methods and Limits (Brill 2023)Google Scholar
Miles, K, The Origins of International Investment Law: Empire, Environment and the Safeguarding of Capital (CUP 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouyal, LW, International Investment Law and the Right to Regulate: A Human Rights Perspective (Routledge 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newcombe, A & Paradell, L, Law and Practice of Investment Treaties: Standards of Treatment (Kluwer 2009)Google Scholar
OECD, International Investment Law: A Changing Landscape: A Companion Volume to International Investment Perspectives (OECD Publishing 2005)Google Scholar
Orakhelashvili, A, The Interpretation of Acts and Rules in Public International Law (OUP 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortino, F, The Origin and Evolution of Investment Treaty Standards: Stability, Value, and Reasonableness (OUP 2020)Google Scholar
Paddeu, F, Justification and Excuse in International Law: Concept and Theory of General Defences (CUP 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pahuja, S, Decolonising International Law: Development, Economic Growth and the Politics of Universality (CUP 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paparinskis, M, The International Minimum Standard and Fair and Equitable Treatment (OUP 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, J, Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law (CUP 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peat, D, Comparative Reasoning in International Courts and Tribunals (CUP 2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piracha, N, Toward Uniformly Accepted Principles for Interpreting MFN Clauses: Striking a Balance Between Sovereignty and the Protection of Investors (Kluwer 2021)Google Scholar
Redfern, A & Hunter, M, Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration (Sweet & Maxwell 2004)Google Scholar
Reinisch, A & Schreuer, C, International Protection of Investments: The Substantive Standards (CUP 2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reitzer, L, La réparation comme conséquence de l’acte illicite en droit international (Sirey 1938)Google Scholar
Rosenne, S (ed), League of Nations Conference for the Codification of International Law (1930), Vol 2 (Oceana 1975)Google Scholar
Sabahi, B, Compensation and Restitution in Investor-State Arbitration: Principles and Practice (OUP 2011)Google Scholar
Salacuse, JW, The Three Laws of International Investment National, Contractual, and International Frameworks for Foreign Capital (OUP 2013)Google Scholar
Sands, P, Peel, J, Fabra, A & ors, Principles of International Environmental Law (CUP 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrijver, N, Sovereignty over Natural Resources: Balancing Rights and Duties (CUP 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sornarajah, M, The International Law on Foreign Investment (2nd edn, CUP 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sornarajah, M, The International Law on Foreign Investment (3rd edn, CUP 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sornarajah, M, Resistance and Change in the International Law on Foreign Investment (CUP 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spanish Treaty Claims Commission, Rules and Regulations of Practice and Procedure: Adopted and Amended from Time to Time by the Commission, Together with a Copy of the Organic Act and Other Papers (US GPO 1902)Google Scholar
Tams, CJ & Sloan, J (eds), The Development of International Law by the International Court of Justice (OUP 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tudor, I, The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Foreign Investment Law (OUP 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vattel, E, The Law of Nations; Or, Principles of the Law of Nature, Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns (first published 1758, Chitty J ed, 6th edn, Johnson 1844)Google Scholar
Villiger, ME, Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Brill 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viñuales, JE, Foreign Investment and the Environment in International Law (CUP 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Visscher, C, De l’equité dans le règlement arbitral ou judiciaire des litiges de droit international public (Pedone 1972)Google Scholar
Weiler, , T, The Interpretation of International Investment Law: Equality, Discrimination and Minimum Standards of Treatment in Historical Context (Martinus Nijhoff 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, RR, The International Law Standard in Treaties of the United States (HUP 1953)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Secondary Sources
van Aaken, A, ‘Control Mechanisms in International Investment Law’ in Douglas, Z, Pauwelyn, J & Viñuales, JE (eds), The Foundations of International Investment Law – Bringing Theory into Practice (OUP 2014)Google Scholar
Abi-Saab, G, ‘Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources and Economic Activities’ in Bedjaoui, M (ed), International Law: Achievements and Prospects (UNESCO 1991)Google Scholar
Abi-Saab, G, ‘La Commission du Droit International, la codification et le processus de la formation de droit international’ in Making Better International Law: The International Law Commission at 50 (UN 1998)Google Scholar
Abi-Saab, G, ‘Introduction: A Meta-Question’ in Abi-Saab, G et al (eds), Evolutionary Interpretation and International Law (Hart 2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Álvarez-Zárate, JM & Beltrán Vargas, DM, ‘Desafíos del arbitraje de inversión en los sectores minero-energético en América Latina’ in Castillo, LFM & Villanueva, C (eds), Anuario iberoamericano en Derecho de la Energía, Vol II, Regulación de la transición Energética (Universidad Externado de Colombia 2019)Google Scholar
Álvarez-Zarate, JM & Beltrán Vargas, DM, ‘El derecho consuetudinario en el derecho internacional de inversiones’ in Álvarez-Zarate, JM & Żenkiewicz, M (eds), El derecho internacional de las inversiones (Universidad Externado de Colombia 2021)Google Scholar
d’Aspremont, J, ‘International Customary Investment Law: Story of a Paradox’ in Gazzini, T & de Brabandere, E (eds), International Investment Law: The Sources of Rights and Obligations (Martinus Nijhoff 2012)Google Scholar
d’Aspremont, J, ‘The Custom-Making Moment in Customary International Law’ in Merkouris, P, Kammerhofer, J & Arajärvi, N (eds), The Theory, Practice, and Interpretation of Customary International Law (CUP 2022)Google Scholar
Baetens, F, ‘Keeping the Status Quo or Embarking on a New Course? Setting Aside, Refusal of Enforcement, Annulment and Appeal’ in Kulick, A (ed), Reassertion of Control over the Investment Treaty Regime (CUP 2017)Google Scholar
Banifatemi, Y, ‘The Law Applicable in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ in Yannaca-Small, K (ed), Arbitration under International Investment Agreements (2nd edn, OUP 2018)Google Scholar
Berger, B, ‘The Use of Experts in International Arbitration: Specific Issues Relating to Legal Experts’ in Besson, S & Frey, H (eds), Expert Evidence: Conflicting Assumptions and How to Handle them in Arbitration (Juris Publishing 2021)Google Scholar
Bianchi, A, ‘The Game of Interpretation in International Law: The Players, the Cards, and Why the Game Is Worth the Candle’ in Bianchi, A, Peat, D & Windsor, M (eds), Interpretation in International Law (OUP 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, A, ‘Epistemic Communities’ in d’Aspremont, J & Singh, S (eds), Concepts for International Law: Contributions to Disciplinary Thought (Edward Elgar 2019)Google Scholar
Binder, C & Janig, P, ‘Investment Agreements and Financial Crises’ in Krajewski, M & Hoffmann, RT (eds), Research Handbook on Foreign Direct Investment (Edward Elgar 2019)Google Scholar
Berensztein, S & Spector, H, ‘Business, Government, and Law’ in della Paolera, G & Taylor, AM (eds), A New Economic History of Argentina (CUP 2003)Google Scholar
Bradley, CA, ‘Customary International Law Adjudication as Common Law Adjudication’ in Bradley, CA (ed), Custom’s Future: International Law in a Changing World (CUP 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, R, Chodorow, D & Dorobantu, F, ‘Valuing Natural Resources Investments’ in Beharry, CL (ed), Contemporary and Emerging Issues on the Law of Damages and Valuation in International Investment Arbitration (Brill Nijhoff 2018)Google Scholar
Cheng, B, ‘Some Remarks on the Constituent Element(s) of General (or So-Called Customary) International Law’ in Anghie, A & Sturgess, G (eds), Legal Visions of the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Judge Christopher Weeramantry (Kluwer 1998)Google Scholar
Chimni, BS, ‘Third World Approaches to International Law: A Manifesto’ in Anghie, A et al (eds), The Third World and International Order: Law, Politics and Globalization (Brill 2003)Google Scholar
Collins, R & Bohm, A, ‘International Law as Professional Practice: Crafting the Autonomy of International Law’ in d’Aspremont, J et al (eds), International Law as a Profession (CUP 2017)Google Scholar
Cordero Moss, G, ‘Tribunal’s Power v Party Autonomy’ in Muchlinski, P, Ortino, F & Schreuer, C (eds), Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (OUP 2008)Google Scholar
Crawford, J, ‘A Consensualist Interpretation of Article 31(3) of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties’ in Nolte, G (ed), Treaties and Subsequent Practice (OUP 2013)Google Scholar
Crawford, J, ‘The International Court of Justice and the Law of State Responsibility’ in Tams, CJ & Sloan, J (eds), The Development of International Law by the International Court of Justice (OUP 2013)Google Scholar
Daillier, P, ‘The Development of the Law of Responsibility through the Case Law’ in Crawford, J, Pellet, A & Olleson, S (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (OUP 2010)Google Scholar
Dolzer, R & von Walter, A, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment – Lines of Jurisprudence on Customary Law’ in Ortino, F, Liberti, L, Sheppard, A & ors (eds), Investment Treaty Law: Current Issues II (BIICL 2007)Google Scholar
Donovan, DF, ‘Re-examining the Legal Expert in International Arbitration’ in HKIAC (ed), International Arbitration: Issues, Perspectives and Practice: Liber Amicorum Neil Kaplan (Wolters Kluwer 2019)Google Scholar
Dumberry, P, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment’ in Schacherer, S & Mbengue, MM(eds), Foreign Investment Under the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) (Springer 2018)Google Scholar
Dumberry, P, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment’ in Bungenberg, M & Reinisch, A (eds), Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA): Article-by-Article Commentary (Nomos/Hart 2021)Google Scholar
Forteau, M, ‘Reparation in the Event of a Circumstance Precluding Wrongfulness’ in Crawford, J, Pellet, A & Olleson, S (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (OUP 2010)Google Scholar
Fox, H, ‘Letter from Henry Fox to John Forsyth, US Secretary of State, dated 6 February 1838’ in Manning, WR (ed), Diplomatic Correspondence of the United States: Canadian Relations, Vol 3 (Carnegie Endowment 1943)Google Scholar
Friedman, MW & Lavaud, F, ‘Damages Principles in Investment Arbitration’ in Trenor, JA (ed), The Guide to Damages in International Arbitration (3rd edn, Global Arbitration Review 2018)Google Scholar
Franke, F, ‘The Custom of Necessity in Investor-State Arbitrations’ in Hofmann, R & Tams, CJ (eds), International Investment Law and General International Law (Nomos 2011)Google Scholar
Gathii, JT, ‘Third World Approaches to International Economic Governance’ in Falk, R, Rajagopal, B & Stevens, J (eds), International Law and the Third World (Routledge 2008)Google Scholar
Gathii, JT, ‘The Agenda of Third World Approaches in International Law’ in Dunoff, J & Pollack, M (eds), International Legal Theory: Foundations and Frontiers (CUP 2022)Google Scholar
Gehring, MW, ‘Impact Assessments of Investment Treaties’ in Cordonier Segger, MC, Gehring, MW & Newcombe, AP (eds), Sustainable Development in World Investment Law (Kluwer Law 2011)Google Scholar
Gehring, MW & Kent, A, ‘International Investment Agreements and the Emerging Green Economy: Rising to the Challenge’ in Baetens, F (ed), Investment Law Within International Law (CUP 2013)Google Scholar
Giannakopoulos, C & Monga, M, ‘History as Interpretative Context in the Evolutionary Interpretation of FET in International Investment Law’ in Abi-Saab, G et al (eds), Evolutionary Interpretation and International Law (Hart 2019)Google Scholar
Giovannini, T, ‘Ex Officio Powers to Investigate: When Do Arbitrators Cross the Line?’ in Baizeau, D & Ehle, B (eds), Stories from the Hearing Room: Experience from Arbitral Practice (Essays in Honour of Michael E Schneider) (Kluwer 2015)Google Scholar
Henckels, C, ‘Scope Limitation or Affirmative Defence? The Purpose and Role of Investment Treaty Exception Clauses’ in Bartels, L & Paddeu, F (eds), Exceptions in International Law (OUP 2020)Google Scholar
Hernandez, G, ‘Interpretative Authority and the International Judiciary’ in Bianchi, A, Peat, D & Windsor, M (eds), Interpretation in International Law (OUP 2015)Google Scholar
Hexner, EP, ‘Teleological Interpretation of Basic Instruments of Public International Organizations’ in Engel, S & Metall, R (eds), Law, State and International Legal Order–Essays in Honor of Hans Kelsen (Tennessee University 1964)Google Scholar
Higgins, R, ‘International Law and the Reasonable Need of Governments to Govern’ in Higgins, R (ed), Themes and Theories: Selected Essays, Speeches and Writings in International Law (OUP 2009)Google Scholar
Hobér, K, ‘State Responsibility and Attribution’ in Muchlinski, P, Ortino, F & Schreuer, C (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (OUP 2008)Google Scholar
Hollis, DB, ‘The Existential Function of Interpretation in International Law’ in Bianchi, A, Peat, D & Windsor, M (eds), Interpretation in International Law (OUP 2015)Google Scholar
Hollis, DB, ‘Introduction’ in Hollis, DB (ed), The Oxford Guide to Treaties (2nd edn, OUP 2020)Google Scholar
Jarrosson, C, ‘L’expertise juridique’ in Reymond, C (ed), Liber amicorum Claude Reymond: Autour de l’arbitrage (Litec Paris 2004)Google Scholar
Johnson, OT & Gimblett, J, ‘From Gunboats to BITs: The Evolution of Modern International Investment Law’ in Sauvant, KP (ed), Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy 2010–2011 (OUP 2012)Google Scholar
Kelly, JP, ‘Customary International Law in Historical Context: The Exercise of Power without General Acceptance’ in Lepard, BD (ed), Reexamining Customary International Law (CUP 2017)Google Scholar
Kent, A & Harrington, A, ‘The Plea of Necessity Under Customary International Law: A Critical Review in Light of the Argentine Cases’ in Brown, C & Miles, K (eds), Evolution in Investment Treaty Arbitration (CUP 2011)Google Scholar
Kurtz, J, Viñuales, JE & Waibel, M, ‘Principles Governing the Global Economy’ in Viñuales, JE (ed), The UN Friendly Relations Declaration at 50: An Assessment of the Fundamental Principles of International Law (CUP 2020)Google Scholar
Langford, M, Behn, D & Lie, R, ‘The Revolving Door in International Investment Arbitration’ in Føllesdal, A & Ulfstein, G (eds), Judicialization of International Law: A Mixed Blessing? (OUP 2018)Google Scholar
Leben, C, ‘L’évolution du droit international des investissements’ in SFDI & IHEI (eds), Un accord multilatéral sur l’investissement: d’un forum de négociation à l’autre? (Pedone 1999)Google Scholar
Lepard, BD, ‘Customary International Law as a Dynamic Process’ in Bradley, CA (ed), Custom’s Future: International Law in a Changing World (CUP 2016)Google Scholar
Lévesque, C & Newcombe, A, ‘Commentary on the Canadian Model Foreign Promotion and Protection Agreement’ in Brown, C (ed), Commentaries on Selected Model Investment Treaties (OUP 2013)Google Scholar
Losari, JJ & Ewing-Chow, M, ‘Legitimate Countermeasures in International Trade Law and Their Illegality in International Investment Law’ in Pazartzis, P & Gavouneli, M (eds), Reconceptualising the Rule of Law in Global Governance, Resources, Investment and Trade (Bloomsbury 2016)Google Scholar
Malinvaud, C, ‘Non-pecuniary Remedies in Investment Treaty and Commercial Arbitration’ in van den Berg, AJ (ed), 50 Years of the New York Convention: ICCA International Arbitration Conference (Kluwer Law International 2009)Google Scholar
Marboe, I, ‘Assessing Compensation and Damages in Expropriation Versus Non-Expropriation Cases’ in Beharry, CL (ed), Contemporary and Emerging Issues on the Law of Damages and Valuation in International Investment Arbitration (Brill Nijhoff 2018)Google Scholar
Mazeaud, D, ‘L’expertise de droit à travers l’amicus curiae’ in Frison-Roche, MA & Mazeaud, D (eds), L’expertise (Dalloz 1995)Google Scholar
Mejía-Lemos, D, ‘General International Law and International Investment Law: A Systematic Analysis of Interactions in Arbitral Practice’ in Chaisse, J et al (eds), Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy (Springer Singapore 2020)Google Scholar
Methymaki, E & Tzanakopoulos, A, ‘Masters of Puppets? Reassertion of Control through Joint Investment Treaty Interpretation’ in Kulick, A (ed), Reassertion of Control Over the Investment Treaty Regime (CUP 2017)Google Scholar
Milano, E, ‘General Principles Infra, Praeter, Contra Legem? The Role of Equity in Determining Reparation’ in Andenas, M & ors (eds), General Principles and the Coherence of International Law, Vol 37 (Brill Nijhoff 2019)Google Scholar
Mileva, N & Fortuna, M, ‘Environmental Protection as an Object of and Tool for Evolutionary Interpretation’ in Abi-Saab, G et al (eds), Evolutionary Interpretation and International Law (Hart 2019)Google Scholar
Mileva, N, ‘The Role of Domestic Courts in the Interpretation of Customary International Law: How Can We Learn from Domestic Interpretive Practices?’ in Merkouris, P, Kammerhofer, J & Arajärvi, N (eds), The Theory, Practice, and Interpretation of Customary International Law (CUP 2022)Google Scholar
Mourre, A, ‘Arbitration and Criminal Law: Jurisdiction, Arbitrability and Duties of the Arbitral Tribunal’ in Mistelis, L & Brekoulakis, S (eds), Arbitrability: International and Comparative Perspectives (Kluwer 2009)Google Scholar
Muchlinski, P, ‘Negotiating International Investment Agreements: New Sustainable Development Oriented Initiatives’ in Hindelang, S, Krajewski, M & ors (eds), Shifting Paradigms in International Investment Law: More Balanced, Less isolated and Increasingly Diversified (OUP 2016)Google Scholar
Orrego Vicuña, F, ‘Le pied du chancelier continue de s’allonger: les principes généraux et l’equité en droit international’ in Kohen, M, Kolb, R & Tehindrazanarivelo, DL (eds), Perspectives of International Law in the 21st Century: Liber Amicorum Professor Christian Dominicè in Honour of his 80th birthday (Martinus Nijhoff 2012)Google Scholar
Owada, H, ‘The International Law Commission and the Process of Law-Formation’ in UN(ed), Making Better International Law: The International Law Commission at 50 (UN 1998)Google Scholar
Özsu, U, ‘Neoliberalism and the New International Economic Order: A History of “Contemporary Legal Thought”’ in Desautels-Stein, J & Tomlins, C (eds), Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought (CUP 2017)Google Scholar
Paddeu, F, ‘The Impact of Investment Arbitration in the Development of State Responsibility Defences’ in Tams CJ, Schill SW & Hofmann R (eds), International Investment Law and General International Law (Edward Elgar 2023)Google Scholar
Pahuja, S & Saunders, A, ‘Rival Worlds and the Place of the Corporation in International Law’ in von Bernstorff, J & Dann, P (eds), The Battle for International Law: South-North Perspectives on the Decolonization Era (OUP 2019)Google Scholar
Paine, J, ‘The Judicial Dimension of Regime Interaction beyond Systemic Integration’ in Trevisanut, S, Giannopoulos, N & Roland Holst, R (eds), Regime Interaction in Ocean Governance: Problems, Theories and Methods (Brill 2020)Google Scholar
Palmerston, L, ‘Letter from Lord Palmerston, British Foreign Secretary, to Andrew Stevenson, American Minister in London, Dated 27 August 1841’ in Manning, WR (ed), Diplomatic Correspondence of the United States: Canadian Relations, Vol 3 (Carnegie Endowment 1943)Google Scholar
Pellet, A, ‘Article 38’ in Zimmerman, A & ors (eds), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary (OUP 2006)Google Scholar
Pellet, A, ‘The ILC’s Articles on State Responsibility for Internationally Wrongful Acts and Related Texts’ in Crawford, J, Pellet, A & Olleson, S (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (OUP 2010)Google Scholar
Pellet, A, ‘Police Powers or the State’s Right to Regulate: Chemtura v Canada’ in Kinnear, M & ors (eds), Building International Investment Law: The First 50 Years of the ICSID Convention (Kluwer 2015)Google Scholar
Protopsaltis, PM, ‘Shareholders’ Injury and Compensation in Investor-State Arbitration’ in Pazartzis, P & Merkouris, P (eds), Permutations of Responsibility in International Law (Brill Nijhoff 2019)Google Scholar
Radi, Y, ‘Promenade avec Aristote Dans les Jardins du Droit International: Réflexions sur L’équité et le Raisonnement Juridique des Juges et Arbitres Internationaux’ in Alland, D, Chetail, V, de Frouville, O & ors (eds), Unity and Diversity of International Law (Brill Nijhoff 2014)Google Scholar
Reinisch, A & Binder, C, ‘Debts and State of Necessity’ in Bohoslavsky, JP & Černič, CL (eds), Making Sovereign Financing and Human Rights Work (Hart 2014)Google Scholar
Reghizzi, ZC, ‘General Rules and Principles on State Responsibility and Damages in Investment Arbitration: Some Critical Issues’ in Gattini, A, Tanzi, A & Fontanelli, F (eds), General Principles of Law and International Investment Arbitration (Brill 2018)Google Scholar
Rosenne, S, ‘The Position of the International Court of Justice on the Foundations of the Principle of Equity in International Law’ in Bloed, A & van Dijk, P (eds), Forty Years International Court of Justice: Jurisdiction, Equity and Equality (Europa Instituut 1988)Google Scholar
Rubins, N, Sinha, V & Roberts, B, ‘Approaches to Valuation in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ in Beharry, CL (ed), Contemporary and Emerging Issues on the Law of Damages and Valuation in International Investment Arbitration (Brill Nijhoff 2018)Google Scholar
Rush, G, Sequeira, K & Shopp, M, ‘Valuation Techniques for Early-Stage Businesses in Investor-State Arbitration’ in Beharry, CL (ed), Contemporary and Emerging Issues on the Law of Damages and Valuation in International Investment Arbitration (Brill Nijhoff 2018)Google Scholar
Sabahi, B, Duggal, K & Birch, N, ‘Principles Limiting the Amount of Compensation’ in Beharry, C (ed), Contemporary and Emerging Issues on the Law of Damages and Valuation in International Investment Arbitration (Brill Nijhoff 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sender, O & Wood, M, ‘Custom’s Bright Future: The Continuing Importance of Customary International Law’ in Bradley, CA (ed), Custom’s Future: International Law in a Changing World (CUP 2016)Google Scholar
Shany, Y, ‘Jurisdiction and Admissibility’ in Romano, C, Alter, K & Shany, Y (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (OUP 2013)Google Scholar
Solomou, A, ‘Exceptions to a Rule Must be Narrowly Construed’ in Klinger, J, Parkhomenko, Y & Salonidis, C (eds), Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention? (Kluwer 2019)Google Scholar
Spielmann, O ‘Applicable Law’ in Muchlinski, P, Ortino, F & Schreuer, C (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (OUP 2008)Google Scholar
Stevenson, A, ‘Letter from Andrew Stevenson, United States Minister to Great Britain, to Lord Palmerston, British Foreign Secretary, Dated 22 May 1838’ in Manning, WR (ed), Diplomatic Correspondence of the United States: Canadian Relations, Vol 3 (Carnegie Endowment 1943)Google Scholar
Tams, CJ, ‘The Development of International Law by the International Court of Justice’ in Cannizzaro, E & ors (eds), Decisions of the ICJ as Sources of International Law? (International and European Papers Publishing 2018)Google Scholar
Tasioulas, J, ‘Customary International Law and the Quest for Global Justice’ in Perreau-Saussine, A & Murphy, JB (eds), The Nature of Customary International Law: Legal, Historical and Philosophical Perspectives (CUP 2007)Google Scholar
Tienhaara, K, ‘Regulatory Chill and the Threat of Arbitration’ in Brown, C & Miles, K (eds), Evolution in Investment Treaty Law and Arbitration (CUP 2011)Google Scholar
Titi, C, ‘Police Powers Doctrine and International Investment Law’ in Gattini, A, Tanzi, A & Fontanelli, F (eds), General Principles of Law and International Investment Arbitration (Brill 2018)Google Scholar
Treder, P & Sadowski, W, ‘Poland’ in Nagy, C (ed), Investment Arbitration in Central and Eastern Europe (Elgar 2019)Google Scholar
Tzanakopoulos, A, ‘We Who Are Not as Others: Sanctions and (Global) Security Governance’ in Geiß, R & Melzer, N (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the International Law of Global Security (OUP 2021)Google Scholar
Ünüvar, G, ‘The Vague Meaning of Fair and Equitable Treatment Principle in Investment Arbitration and New Generation Clarifications’ in Kjær, AL & Lam, J (eds), Language and Legal Interpretation in International Law (OUP 2022)Google Scholar
Viñuales, JE, ‘Sovereignty in Foreign Investment Law’ in Douglas, Z, Pauwelyn, J & Viñuales, JE (eds), The Foundations of International Investment Law: Bringing Theory into Practice (OUP 2014)Google Scholar
Waibel, M, ‘Interpretive Communities in International Law’ in Bianchi, A, Peat, D & Windsor, M (eds), Interpretation in International Law (OUP 2015)Google Scholar
Wälde, TW & Sabahi, B, ‘Compensation, Damages and Valuation’ in Muchlinski, P, Ortino, F & Schreuer, C (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (OUP 2008)Google Scholar
Webster, D, ‘Letter from Daniel Webster, US Secretary of State, to Henry Fox, British Minister in Washington, Dated 24 April 1841’ in Manning, WR (ed), Diplomatic Correspondence of the United States: Canadian Relations, Vol 3 (Carnegie Endowment 1943)Google Scholar
Weil, P, ‘L’Equité Dans La Jurisprudence de la Cour Internationale de Justice: Un Mystère en Voie de Dissipation?’ in Lowe, V & Fitzmaurice, M (eds), Fifty Years of the International Court of Justice (CUP 1996)Google Scholar
Wood, M, ‘The Caroline Incident – 1837’ in Ruys, T, Corten, O & Hofer, A (eds), The Use of Force in International Law: A Case-Based Approach (OUP 2018)Google Scholar
Wouters, J & Chane, AL, ‘Multinational Corporations in International Law’ in Noorman, M, Reinisch, A & Ryngaert, C (eds), Non-State Actors in International Law (Bloomsbury 2017)Google Scholar
Yamashita, T, ‘Investors in the Formation of Customary International Law’ in Droubi, S & d’Aspremont, J (eds), International Organisations, Non-State Actors, and the Formation of Customary International Law (MUP 2020)Google Scholar
Yotova, R, ‘Systemic Integration: An Instrument for Reasserting the State’s Control in Investment Arbitration?’ in Kulick, A (ed), Reassertion of Control over the Investment Treaty Regime (CUP 2016)Google Scholar
Yotova, R, ‘Compliance with Domestic Law: An Implied Condition in Treaties Conferring Rights and Protections on Foreign Nationals and Their Property?’ in Klingler, J, Parkhomenko, Y & Salonidis, C (eds), Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention? Canons and Other Principles of Interpretation in Public International Law (Kluwer 2018)Google Scholar
Zidar, A, ‘Interpretation and the International Legal Profession: Between Duty and Aspiration’ in Bianchi, A, Peat, D & Windsor, M (eds), Interpretation in International Law (OUP 2015)Google Scholar
Abi-Saab, G, ‘The Newly Independent States and the Rules of International Law: An Outline’ (1962) 8 How LJ 100Google Scholar
Abi-Saab, G, ‘The Third World Intellectual in Praxis: Confrontation, Participation, or Operation behind Enemy Lines’ (2016) 37(11) Third World Quarterly 1957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguilar Alvarez, G & Park, WW, ‘The New Face of Investment Arbitration: NAFTA Chapter 11’ (2003) 28 YJIL 365Google Scholar
AJIL, ‘Mexico – United States: Expropriation by Mexico of Agrarian Properties Owned by American Citizens’ (1938) 32 AJIL Supp 181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akehurst, M, ‘International Liability for Injurious Consequences Arising Out of Acts Not Prohibited by International Law’ (1985) 16 NYIL 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akinsanya, A, ‘International Protection of Direct Foreign Investments in the Third World’ (1987) 36 ICLQ 58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al Faruque, A, ‘Creating Customary International Law Through Bilateral Investment Treaties: A Critical Appraisal’ (2004) 44 IJIL 312Google Scholar
Alvarez, JE, ‘The Public International Law Regime Governing International Investment’ (2009) 344 RdC 292Google Scholar
Alvarez, JE, ‘Are Corporations “Subjects” of International Law’ (2011) 9(1) Santa Clara Journal of International Law 1Google Scholar
Álvarez-Zárate, JM, ‘Legitimacy Concerns of the Proposed Multilateral Investment Court: Is Democracy Possible?’ (2018) 59(8) BCLRev 2765Google Scholar
Anderson, CP, ‘Letter of the Honorable Chandler P Anderson, American Arbitrator, to the Secretary General of the Permanent Court of Arbitration’ reproduced in (1923) 17(2) AJIL 362Google Scholar
Angie, A & Chimni, BS, ‘Third World Approaches to International Law and Individual Responsibility in Internal Conflicts’ (2003) 2 Chin J Int Law 78Google Scholar
Arato, J, Claussen, K & Heath, JB, ‘The Perils of Pandemic Exceptionalism’ (2020) 114 AJIL 627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d’Aspremont, J, ‘The Idea of ‘Rules’ in the Sources of International Law’ (2014) 84 BYBIL 103Google Scholar
d’Aspremont, J, ‘Three International Lawyers in a Hall of Mirrors’ (2019) 32 LJIL 367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azaria, D, ‘Codification by Interpretation: The International Law Commission as an Interpreter of International Law’ (2020) 31(1) EJIL 171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baade, HW, ‘Proving Foreign and International Law in Domestic Tribunals’ (1978) 18(4) VaJInt’l L 619Google Scholar
Baetens, F, ‘Protecting Foreign Investment and Public Health: From Arbitral Balancing via Treaty Reform to Synergy by Design?’ (2022) 71 ICLQ 139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, TE, ‘The Impropriety of Expert Witness Testimony on the Law’ (1992) 40 UKanLRev 325Google Scholar
Banteka, N, ‘A Theory of Constructive Interpretation for Customary International Law Identification’ (2018) 39(3) MichJInt’l Law 301Google Scholar
Barrera, B, ‘The Case for Removing the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard from NAFTA’ (2017) 128 CIGI Papers 10Google Scholar
Bedjaoui, M, ‘Expediency in the Decisions of the International Court of Justice’ (2000) 71 BYBIL 1Google Scholar
Beharry, CL, ‘Prejudgment Interest Rates in International Investment Arbitration’ (2016) 8(1) JIDS 56Google Scholar
Blandford, AC, ‘The History of Fair and Equitable Treatment Before the Second World War’ (2017) 32(2) ICSID Rev 294Google Scholar
von Bogdandy, A & Venzke, I, ‘In Whose Name? An Investigation of International Courts’ Public Authority and Its Democratic Justification’ (2012) 23(1) EJIL 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bordin, FL, ‘A Glass Half Full? The Character, Function and Value of the Two-Element Approach to Identifying Customary International Law’ (2019) 21 ICLR 283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Born, G, Morris, D & Forrest, S, ‘“A Margin of Appreciation”: Appreciating Its Irrelevance in International Law’ (2020) 61 HarvILJ 65Google Scholar
Boyle, A, ‘Globalising Environmental Liability: The Interplay of National and International Law’ (2005) 17(1) JEL 3Google Scholar
Broches, A, ‘The Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States’ (1973) 136 RdC 333Google Scholar
Brower, C & Tepe, J, ‘The Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States: A Reflection or Rejection of International Law?’ (1975) 9(2) Intl Law 295Google Scholar
Brower, C, ‘Evidence Before International Tribunals: The Need for Some Standard Rules’ (1994) 28(1) Int’l L 47Google Scholar
Brownlie, I, ‘Legal Status of Natural Resources in International Law (Some Aspects)’ (1979) 162 RdC 245Google Scholar
Caron, D, ‘The ILC Articles on State Responsibility: The Paradoxical Relationship between Form and Authority’ (2002) 96 AJIL 857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chasapis Tassinis, O, ‘Customary International Law: Interpretation from Beginning to End’ (2020) 31(1) EJIL 235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chimni, BS, ‘Customary International Law: A Third World Perspective’ (2018) 112(1) AJIL 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choudhury, B, ‘Evolution or Devolution? Defining Fair and Equitable Treatment in International Investment Law’ (2005) 6(2) JWIT 297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christol, CQ, ‘International Liability for Damage Caused by Space’ (1980) 74(2) AJIL 346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, D & Goldman, Z, ‘Like It or Not, Unilateral Sanctions Are Here to Stay’ (2019) 113 AJIL Unbound 146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corten, O, ‘The Notion of “Reasonable” in International Law: Legal Discourse, Reason and Contradictions’ (1999) 48 ICLQ 613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox Alomar, R, ‘Investment Treaty Arbitration in Cuba’ (2017) 48(3) U Miami Inter-Am L Rev 1Google Scholar
Crawford, J, ‘The ILC’s Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts: A Retrospect’ (2002) 96 AJIL 874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, J, ‘Investment Arbitration and the ILC Articles on State Responsibility’ (2010) 25 ICSID Rev 127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crook, JR, ‘Applicable Law in International Commercial Arbitration: The Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal Experience’ (1989) 83(2) AJIL 278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, H, ‘Investor-State Dispute Settlement and the Future of the Precautionary Principle’ (2016) 5(2) Br J A Leg Studies 449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Descamps É, Baron, ‘L’Influence de la Condamnation de la Guerre sur l’Evolution Juridique Internationale’ (1930) 31 RdC 394Google Scholar
Desierto, DA, ‘The Outer Limits of Adequate Reparations for Breaches of Non-Expropriation Investment Treaty Provisions: Choice and Proportionality in Chorzòw’ (2017) 55(2) ColumJ Transnat’l L 395Google Scholar
Díaz Inverso, R, ‘El estado de necesidad como circunstancia que excluye la ilicitud en la responsabilidad internacional de los Estados’ (2015) 47 Revista de Derecho Público 49Google Scholar
Dolzer, R, ‘New Foundations of the Law of Expropriation of Alien Property’ (1981) 75(3) AJIL 553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolzer, R, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: A Key Standard in Investment Treaties’ (2005) 39(1) IntI Law 87Google Scholar
Dumberry, P, ‘Are BITs Representing the ‘New’ Customary International Law in International Investment Law’ (2010) 28 Penn State Int Law Rev 675Google Scholar
Dumberry, P, ‘”Cross Treaty Interpretation” en Bloc or How CAFTA Tribunals Are Systematically Interpreting the FET Standard Based NAFTA Case Law’ The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals (forthcoming 2023)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumberry, P, ‘Moving the Goal Post! How Some NAFTA Tribunals Have Challenged the FTC Note of Interpretation on the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard Under NAFTA Article 1105’ (2014) 8(2) WAMR 251Google Scholar
Dumberry, P, ‘A Few Observations on the Remaining Fundamental Importance of Customary Rules in the Age of Treatification of International Investment Law’ (2016) 34(1) ASA Bulletin 41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumberry, P, ‘Has the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard become a Rule of Customary International Law?’ (2016) 8(1) JIDS 155Google Scholar
Dumberry, P, ‘The Importation of the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard Through MFN Clauses: An Empirical Study of BITs’ (2016) 17 ICSID Rev 229Google Scholar
Dumberry, P, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: Its Interaction with the Minimum Standard and its Customary Status’ (2017) 1(2) Brill Research Perspectives in International Investment Law and Arbitration 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupuy, PM, ‘A Doctrinal Debate in the Globalisation Era: On the “Fragmentation” of International Law’ (2007) 1 EJLS 1Google Scholar
Elrifai, SN, ‘Equity-Based Discretion and the Anatomy of Damages Assessment in Investment Treaty Law’ (2017) 34(5) JInt’l Arb 835Google Scholar
Encinas de Munagorri, R, ‘L’ouverture de la Cour de cassation aux amici curiae’ [2005] RTD civ 88Google Scholar
van Ert, G, ‘The Admissibility of International Legal Evidence’ (2005) 84 CanBar Rev 31Google Scholar
Eslava, L & Pahuja, S, ‘Between Resistance and Reform: TWAIL and the Universality of International Law’ (2011) 3 Trade, Law and Development 103Google Scholar
Fahner, JH & Happold, M, ‘The Human Rights Defence in International Investment Arbitration: Exploring the Limits of Systemic Integration’ (2019) 68(3) ICLQ 741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahner, JH, ‘Maximising Investment Protection under the Minimum Standard – A Case Study of the Evolutive Interpretation and Application of Customary International Law in Investment Arbitration’ (2023) 12(1) ESIL Reflections 1 <https://esil-sedi.eu/esil-reflection-maximising-investment-protection-under-the-minimum-standard-a-case-study-of-the-evolutive-interpretation-and-application-of-customary-international-law-in-investment-arbitration-2/>Google Scholar
Fauchald, OK, ‘The Legal Reasoning of ICSID Tribunals – An Empirical Analysis’ (2008) 19(2) EJIL 301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fidler, DP, ‘From International Sanitary Conventions to Global Health Security: The New International Health Regulations’ (2005) 4 Chin J Int Law 325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzmaurice, G, ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice: International Organizations and Tribunals’ (1952) 29 BYBIL 1Google Scholar
Foster, CE, ‘Respecting Regulatory Measures: Arbitral Method and Reasoning in the Philip Morris v Uruguay Tobacco Plain Packaging Case’ (2017) 26(3) RECIEL 287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaja, G, ‘Interpreting Articles Adopted by the International Law Commission’ (2015) 85 BYBIL 10Google Scholar
Gallindo, GRB & Yip, C, ‘Customary International Law and the Third World: Do Not Step on the Grass’ (2017) 16(2) Chin J Int Law 251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gantz, DA, ‘The Evolution of FTA Investment Provisions: From NAFTA to the United States – Chile Free Trade Agreement’ (2003) 19(4) AmUIntl LRev 679Google Scholar
García-Amador, FV, ‘The Proposed New International Economic Order: A New Approach to the Law Governing Nationalization and Compensation’ (1980) 12 LawAmer 1Google Scholar
Gathii, JT, ‘The Promise of International Law: A Third World View’ (2021) 36(3) American University International Law Review 377Google Scholar
Gotanda, JY, ‘Compound Interest in International Disputes’ (2003) 34(2) Law & PolIntBus 393Google Scholar
Gourgourinis, A, ‘Delineating the Normativity of Equity in International Law’ (2009) 11(3) ICLR 327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gourgourinis, A, ‘Equity in International Law Revisited (with Special Reference to the Fragmentation of International Law)’ (2009) 103 ASIL Proc 79Google Scholar
Gourgourinis, A, ‘The Distinction between Interpretation and Application of Norms in International Adjudication’ (2011) 2 JIDS 31Google Scholar
Gourgourinis, A, ‘General/Particular International Law and Primary/Secondary Rules: Unitary Terminology of a Fragmented System’ (2011) 22 EJIL 993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graefrath, B, ‘Responsibility and Damages Caused: Relationship between Responsibility and Damages’ (1984) 185 RdC 14Google Scholar
Grauer, C, ‘The Role of Equity in the Jurisprudence of the World Court’ (1979) 37 RDUT 101Google Scholar
Guha-Roy, SN, ‘Is the Law of Responsibility of States for Injuries to Aliens A Part of Universal International Law?’ (1961) 55 AJIL 866Google Scholar
Guzman, AT, ‘Why LDCs Sign Treaties That Hurt Them: Explaining the Popularity of Bilateral Investment Treaties’ (1998) 38(4) VaJIntlL 64Google Scholar
Habibi, R & ors, ‘The Stellenbosch Consensus on Legal National Responses to Public Health Risks: Clarifying Article 43 of the International Health Regulations’ (2022) 19 IOLR 90Google Scholar
Haeri, H, ‘A Tale of Two Standards: ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment’ and the Minimum Standard in International Law’ (2011) 27 Arb Intl 34Google Scholar
Haight, GW, ‘International Organizations OECD Resolution on the Protection of Foreign Property’ (1968) 2(2) Int’l L 326Google Scholar
Handl, G, ‘The Environment: International Rights and Responsibilities’ (1980) 74 ASIL Proc 222Google Scholar
Heller, KJ, ‘Specially Affected States and the Formation of Custom’ (2018) 112(2) AJIL 191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henckels, C, ‘Protecting Regulatory Autonomy through Greater Precision in Investment Treaties: The TPP, CETA and TTIP’ (2016) 19(1) J Intl Econ Law 27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrero Rubio, A, ‘Curso De 1955 De La Universidad De Valladolid en Vitoria’ (1956) 9(1/2) REDI 281Google Scholar
Hippolyte, AR, ‘Correcting TWAIL’s Bind Spots: A Plea for a Pragmatic Approach to International Economic Governance’ (2016) 18 ICLR 34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, MO, ‘The Seventh Year of the Permanent Court of International Justice’ (1929) 3(1) AJIL 1Google Scholar
IDI, ‘Resolution: On the Jurisdiction of the International Judge in Equity’ (1937) 40 AIDI 140Google Scholar
International Organization, ‘International Court of Justice’ (1959) 13(3) Int’l Org 446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jadeau, F & Gélinas, F, ‘CETA’s Definition of the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard: Toward a Guided and Constrained Interpretation’ (2016) 13(1) TDM 1Google Scholar
Jennings, RY, ‘The Progressive Development of International Law and its Codification’ (1947) 24 BYBIL 301Google Scholar
Jennings, RY ‘The Judiciary, International and National, and the Development of International Law’ (1996) 45 ICLQ 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiménez De Aréchaga, E, ‘International Law in the Past Third of a Century’ (1978) 159 RdC 1Google Scholar
Johnstone, I, ‘Treaty Interpretation: The Authority of Interpretive Communities’ (1991) 12(2) MJInt’l Law 371Google Scholar
Junngam, N, ‘The Full Protection and Security Standard in International Investment Law: What and Who is Investment Fully[?] Protected and Secured From?’ (2018) 7 AUBLR 1Google Scholar
Kaufman Hevener, N & Mosher, SA, ‘General Principles of Law and the UN Covenant on Civil and Political Rights’ (1978) 27(3) ICLQ 596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessedjian, C, ‘Le tiers impartial et indépendant en droit international: Juge, arbitre, médiateur, conciliateur – Cours général de droit international’ (2019) 403 RdC 56Google Scholar
Kill, T, ‘Don’t Cross the Streams: Past and Present Overstatement of Customary International Law in Connection with Conventional Fair and Equitable Treatment Obligations’ (2008) 106 MichLRev 853Google Scholar
Klein Bronfman, M, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: An Evolving Standard’ (2006) 10 Max Planck YrbkUNL 615Google Scholar
Knull, WH, Jones, ST, Tyler, TJ & ors, ‘Accounting for Uncertainty in Discounted Cash Flow Valuation of Upstream Oil and Gas Investments’ (2007) 25 JENRL 268Google Scholar
Krajewski, M, ‘A Nightmare or a Noble Dream? Establishing Investor Obligations Through Treaty-Making and Treaty-Application’ (2020) 5(1) BHRJ 105Google Scholar
Kriebaum, U, ‘Regulatory Takings: Balancing the Interests of the Investor and the State’ (2007) 8(5) JWIT 717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kułaga, Ł, ‘Implementing Achmea: The Quest for Fundamental Change in International Investment Law’ (2019) 39 Polish YBInt’l Law 227Google Scholar
Kułaga, Ł, ‘Interpretative Declarations as an Instrument of Transformation of International Investment Law: Measures for Restraining Judicial Activism’ (author’s translation) (2019) 81(3) Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny I Socjologiczny 53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulick, A, ‘Sneaking Through the Backdoor – Reflections on Public Interest in International Investment Arbitration’ (2013) 29(3) Arb Intl 435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauterpacht, E, ‘Issues of Compensation and Nationality in the Taking of Energy Investments’ (1990) 8(1) JERL 241Google Scholar
Lee, J, ‘Note on COVID-19 and the Police Powers Doctrine: Assessing the Allowable Scope of Regulatory Measures During a Pandemic’ (2020) 13 CAAJ 229Google Scholar
Lévesque, C, ‘Influences on the Canadian Model FIPA and US Model BIT: NAFTA Chapter 11 and Beyond’ (2006) 44 CanYBIL 255Google Scholar
Lowenfeld, AF, ‘Investment Agreements and International Law’ (2003) 42 ColumJ Transnat’l L 123Google Scholar
Magraw, K, ‘Investor-State Disputes and the Rise of Recourse to State Party Pleadings as Subsequent Agreements or Subsequent Practice under the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties’ (2015) 30 ICSID Rev 142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, HJ, ‘The Role of Experts in Proving International Human Rights Law in Domestic Courts: A Commentary’ (1996) 25 GaJInt’l& CompL 205Google Scholar
Mann, FA, ‘British Treaties for the Promotion and Protection of Investments’ (1981) 52 BYBIL 241Google Scholar
Marks, S, ‘Expropriation: Compensation and Asset Valuation’ (1989) 48(2) CLJ 170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marotti, L, ‘The Proliferation of Joint Interpretation Clauses in New International Investment Agreements: A Mixed Blessing?’ (2020) 35 ICSID Rev 63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marzal, T, ‘Quantum (In)Justice: Rethinking the Calculation of Compensation and Damages in ISDS’ (2021) 22 JWIT 249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayeda, G, ‘Playing Fair: The Meaning of Fair and Equitable Treatment in Bilateral Investment Treaties’ (2007) 41(2) JWT 273Google Scholar
McLachlan, C, ‘Investment Treaties and General International Law’ (2008) 57 ICLQ 361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendelson, MH, ‘Compensation for Expropriation: The Case Law’ (1985) 79(2) AJIL 414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merkouris, P, ‘Interpreting the Customary Rules on Interpretation’ (2017) 19 ICLR 126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merkouris, P & Mileva, N, ‘ESIL Reflection: Introduction to the Series “Customary Law Interpretation as a Tool”’ (2022) 11(1) ESIL Reflections 1 <https://esil-sedi.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/ESIL-Reflection-Merkouris-Mileva.pdf>Google Scholar
Mickelson, K, ‘Rhetoric and Rage: Third World Voices in International Legal Discourse’ (1998) 16(2) Wisconsin International Law Journal 353Google Scholar
Moremen, PM, ‘National Court Decisions as State Practice: A Transnational Judicial Dialogue?’ (2006) 32 NCJInt’l L& ComReg 259Google Scholar
Muir Watt, H & Creach, M, ‘Expertise sur la teneur du droit étranger’ [2016] Répertoire de droit international (Dalloz 2016)Google Scholar
Muir Watt, H & Creach, M, ‘Notion d’expertise’ [2016] Répertoire de droit international (Dalloz 2016)Google Scholar
Murase, S, ‘Epidemics and International Law’ (2021) 81 Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit International 37Google Scholar
Nelson, D, ‘The Roles of Equity in the Delimitation of Maritime Boundaries’ (1990) 84(4) AJIL 837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nollkaemper, A, ‘Constitutionalization and the Unity of the Law of International Responsibility’ (2009) 16 IJGLS 535Google Scholar
Odumosu, IT, ‘The Law and Politics of Engaging Resistance in Dispute Settlement’ (2007) 26 Penn State Int Law Rev 251Google Scholar
Okubuiro, JC, ‘Application of Hegemony to Customary International Law: An African Perspective’ (2018) 7 Global Journal of Comparative Law 232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olleson, S, ‘Attribution in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ (2016) 31 ICSID Rev 457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orellana, MA, ‘International Law on Investment: The Minimum Standard of Treatment (MST)’ (2004) 3 TDM 1Google Scholar
Paddeu, F & Waibel, M, ‘The Final Act: Exploring the End of Pandemics’ (2020) 114 AJIL 698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paparinskis, M, ‘Investment Arbitration and the Law of Countermeasures’ (2009) 79 BYBIL 264Google Scholar
Paparinskis, M, ‘Investment Treaty Arbitration and the (New) Law of State Responsibility’ (2013) 24 EJIL 617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paparinskis, M, ‘A Case Against Crippling Compensation in International Law of State Responsibility’ (2020) 83(6) MLR 1 MLR 1Google Scholar
Paparinskis, M, ‘The Once and Future Law of State Responsibility’ (2020) 114 AJIL 618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulsson, J, ‘International Arbitration and the Generation of Legal Norms: Treaty Arbitration and International Law’ (2006) 3(5) TDM 11Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, J, ‘Editorial Comment: Adding Sweeteners to Softwood Lumber: The WTO–NAFTA “Spaghetti Bowl” Is Cooking’ (2006) 9 JIEL 197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, J, ‘The Use of Experts in WTO Dispute Settlement’ (2008) 51(2) ICLQ 325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pederson, OW, ‘From Abundance to Indeterminacy: The Precautionary Principle and its Two Camps of Custom’ (2014) 3(2) TEL 32Google Scholar
Pellet, A, ‘L’adaptation du droit international aux besoins changeants de la société internationale’ (2007) 329 RdC 9Google Scholar
Picherack, JR, ‘The Expanding Scope of the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard: Have Recent Tribunals Gone Too Far?’ (2008) 9(4) JWIT 264Google Scholar
Potestà, M, ‘Legitimate Expectations in Investment Treaty Law: Understanding the Roots and Limits of a Controversial Concept’ (2013) 28 ICSID Rev 88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pozen, DE & Scheppele, KL, ‘Executive Underreach, in Pandemics and Otherwise’ (2020) 114 AJIL 608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preiswerk, R, ‘New Developments in Bilateral Investment Protection – With Special Reference to Belgian Practice’ (1967) 3 RBDI 173Google Scholar
Ranjan, P, ‘Police Powers, Indirect Expropriation in International Investment Law, and Article 31(3)(c) of the VCLT: A Critique of Philip Morris v Uruguay’ (2019) 9 AsianJIL 98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratner, SR, ‘Compensation for Expropriations in a Word of Investment Treaties: Beyond the Lawful/Unlawful Distinction’ (2017) 111(1) AJIL 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisman, MW & Sloane, RD, ‘Indirect Expropriation and its Valuation in the BIT Convention’ (2004) 74 BYBIL 115Google Scholar
Ripert, G, ‘Les Règles du Droit Civil Applicables aux Rapports Internationaux (Contribution à l’étude des principes généraux du droit visés au Statut de la Cour permanente de Justice internationale)’ (1933) 44 RdC 565Google Scholar
Roberts, A, ‘Traditional and Modern Approaches to Customary International Law: A Reconciliation’ (2001) 95(4) AJIL 757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, A, ‘State-to-State Investment Treaty Arbitration: A Hybrid Theory of Interdependent Rights and Shared Interpretive Authority’ (2014) 55(1) HarvILJ 69Google Scholar
Root, E, ‘The Basis of Protection to Citizens Residing Abroad’ (1910) 4 AJIL 521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, MC, ‘Glamis Gold, Ltd v The United States and the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard’ (2011) 56(4) McGill LJ 919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryngaert, C & Hora Siccama, D, ‘Ascertaining Customary International Law: An Inquiry into the Methods Used by Domestic Courts’ (2018) 65 NILR 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salacuse, JW, ‘The Treatification of International Investment Law’ (2007) 13(1)1 Law & Bus Rev Am 155Google Scholar
Salter, J, ‘Hugo Grotius: Property and Consent’ (2001) 29 Political Theory 537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schacherer, S, ‘TPP, CETA and TTIP Between Innovation and Consolidation – Resolving Investor-State Disputes Under Mega-Regionals’ (2016) 7(3) JIDS 631Google Scholar
Schreuer, C, ‘Decisions Ex Aequo et Bono under the ICSID Convention’ (1996) 11 ICSID Rev – FILJ 37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreuer, C, ‘Fair and Equitable Standard (FET): Interaction with Other Standards’ (2007) 4(5) TDM 68Google Scholar
Schreuer, C, ‘The Development of International Law by ICSID Tribunals’ (2016) 31(3) ICSID Rev 728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzenberger, G, ‘The Fundamental Principles of International Law’ (1955) 87 RdC 192Google Scholar
Schwebel, SM, ‘Investor-State Disputes and the Development of International Law: The Influence of Bilateral Investment Treaties on Customary International Law’ (2004) 98 ASIL Proc 27Google Scholar
Schwebel, SM, ‘Is Neer far from Fair and Equitable?’ (2011) 27(4) Arb Intl 555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selby, JM, ‘State Responsibility and the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal’ (1989) 83 ASIL Proc 240Google Scholar
Selivanova, YS, ‘Changes in Renewables Support Policy and Investment Protection under the Energy Charter Treaty: Analysis of Jurisprudence and Outlook for the Current Arbitration Cases’ (2018) 33 ICSID Rev 433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirlow, E, ‘Deference and Indirect Expropriation Analysis in International Investment Law: Observations on Current Approaches and Frameworks for Future Analysis’ (2014) 29 ICSID Rev 595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirlow, E & Duggal, K, ‘Special Issue on 20th Anniversary of ARSIWA: The ILC Articles on State Responsibility in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ (2022) 37 ICSID Rev 378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloane, R, ‘On the Use and Abuse of Necessity in the Law of State Responsibility’ (2012) 106 AJIL 447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohn, LB & Baxter, RR, ‘Responsibility of States for Injuries to the Economic Interests of Aliens’ (1961) 55 AJIL 545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommerich, OC & Busch, B, ‘The Expert Witness and the Proof of Foreign Law’ (1953) 38 Cornell L Rev 125Google Scholar
Sornarajah, M, ‘Mutations of Neo-Liberalism in International Investment Law’ (2011) 3 Trade Law and Development 203Google Scholar
Sugarman, SD, ‘The “Necessity” Defense and the Failure of Tort Theory: The Case Against Strict Liability for Damages Caused While Exercising Self-Help in an Emergency’ (2005) 5(2) Issues in Legal Scholarship 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talmon, S, ‘Determining Customary International Law: The ICJ’s Methodology between Induction, Deduction and Assertion’ (2015) 26 EJIL 417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tams, CJ & Tzanakopoulos, A, ‘Barcelona Traction at 40: The ICJ as an Agent of Legal Development’ (2010) 23 LJIL 781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, JC, ‘Reflections on Article 1105 of NAFTA: History, State Practice and the Influence of Commentators’ (2002) 17(1) ICSID Rev 26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres, F, ‘Revisiting the Chorzów Factory Standard of Reparation – Its Relevance in Contemporary International Law and Practice’ (2021) 90(2) Nord J Intl L 190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tzeng, P, ‘Investments on Disputed Territory: Indispensable Parties and Indispensable Issues’ (2017) 14 Braz J Int Law 121Google Scholar
Uchkunova, I & Temnikov, O, ‘A Procrustean Bed: Pre- and Post-award Interest in ICSID Arbitration’ (2014) 29(3) ICSID Rev 648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNCTAD, ‘Phase 2 of IIA Reform: Modernizing the Existing Stock of Old-Generation Treaties’ (2017) (2) IIA Issues Note 1Google Scholar
Vandevelde, K, ‘A Comparison of the 2004 and 1994 US Model BITs’ (2008–2009) 1 YB Intl Invest L&Pol 291Google Scholar
Van Harten, G, ‘TWAIL and the Dabhol Arbitration’ (2011) 3(1) Trade, Law and Development 131Google Scholar
Vasciannie, S, ‘The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Investment Law and Practice’ (1999) 70(1) BYBIL 99Google Scholar
Vierdag, EW, ‘The Time of the ‘Conclusion’ of a Multilateral Treaty: Article 30 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and Related Provisions’ (1988) 59 BYBIL 100Google Scholar
de Visscher, C, ‘Contribution à l’etude des sources du droit international’ (1933) 60 RDILC 395Google Scholar
Waibel, M, ‘Subject Matter Jurisdiction: The Notion of Investment’ (2021) 19 ICSID Rep 25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilde, Jr , PS, ‘El Derecho Internacional y el Petróleo Mexicano’ (1940) 7(26(2)) Trimestre Económico 271Google Scholar
Wilson, MJ, ‘Demystifying the Determination of Foreign Law in US Courts: Opening the Door to a Greater Global Understanding’ (2011) 46(5) Wake Forest LRev 887Google Scholar
Woolsey, LH, ‘The Expropriation of Oil Properties by Mexico’ (1938) 32(3) AJIL 519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yntema, HE, ‘The Treaties with Germany and Compensation for War Damage. IV: The Measure of Damages in International Law’ (1924) 24(2) ColumLRev 134Google Scholar
Żenkiewicz, M, ‘Compensable vs. Non-Compensable States’ Measures: Blurred Picture Under Investment Law’ (2020) 17(3) MJIEL 362Google Scholar
Heathcote, H, ‘State of Necessity and International Law’ (PhD Thesis No 772, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, 2005)Google Scholar
Manton, R, ‘Necessity in International Law’ (PhD thesis, University of Oxford, 2016) <https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:0ee2dd8e-6eac-4364-b538-21ae5eb932a2/download_file?file_format=pdf&safe_filename=Ryan%2BManton%252C%2BNecessity%2Bin%2BInternational%2BLaw.pdf&type_of_work=Thesis>>Google Scholar
OECD, ‘“Indirect Expropriation” and the “Right to Regulate” in International Investment Law’ (OECD Working Papers on International Investment 2004/04, 2004)Google Scholar
Pinchis-Paulsen, M, ‘The Life and Death (and Re-Birth) of “Fair and” “Equitable Treatment:” A Historical Examination of Twentieth Century International Trade and Investment Law Treaty-Making and Political Decision-Making’ (PhD Thesis, King’s College London, 2017)Google Scholar
ALI & UNIDROIT, ‘ALI/UNIDROIT Principles of Transnational Civil Procedure’ (UNIDROIT, 2006) <www.unidroit.org/instruments/civil-procedure/ali-unidroit-principles/>>Google Scholar
Ashburton Ld, ‘Lord Ashburton’s letter to Lord Aberdeen, Dated 13 August 1842’ (Avalon Project, Yale University, 2021) <https://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/br-1842d.asp#ash1>>Google Scholar
Batura, J, Hettihewa, J & Kulish, P, ‘“I resigned because Russia had become an absolutely indefensible client”: An Interview with Alain Pellet’ (Völkerrechtsblog, 4 July 2022) <https://voelkerrechtsblog.org/de/i-resigned-because-russia-had-become-an-absolutely-indefensible-client/>>Google Scholar
Bloomer, P & ors, ‘Call for ISDS Moratorium During COVID-19 Crisis and Response’ (Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment, 6 May 2020) <http://ccsi.columbia.edu/2020/05/05/isds-moratorium-during-covid-19>>Google Scholar
CEPEJ, ‘European Judicial Systems – Edition 2014 (2012 data): Efficiency and Quality of Justice’ (EEEI, 9 October 2014) <https://experts-institute.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/extract-rapport-2014-en.pdf>>Google Scholar
CIMVAL, ‘Standards and Guidelines for Valuation of Mineral Properties: Special Committee of the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum on Valuation of Mineral Properties’ (CIMVAL, 2003) <https://mrmr.cim.org/media/1020/cimval-standards-guidelines.pdf>>Google Scholar
CIMVAL, ‘The CIMVAL Code for the Valuation of Mineral Properties’ (CIMVAL, 2019) <https://mrmr.cim.org/media/1135/cimval-code-november2019.pdf>>Google Scholar
van Ert, G, ‘The Reception of International Law in Canada: Three Ways we Might Go Wrong’ (Canada in International Law at 150 and Beyond Paper No 2, 2018) <www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/documents/Reflections%20Series%20Paper%20no.2web.pdf>>Google Scholar
EU Member States, ‘Declaration of the Governments of the Member States on the Legal Consequences of the Judgment of the Court of Justice in Achmea and on Investment Protection in the European Union of 22 EU-Member States’ (European Commission, 15 January 2019) <https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/190117-bilateral-investment-treaties_en>>Google Scholar
FTC, ‘Statement of the Free Trade Commission on Non-Disputing Party Participation’ (FTC, 7 October 2003) <www.sice.oas.org/tpd/nafta/commission/nondispute_e.pdf>>Google Scholar
German Government, ‘On the Application of International Law in Cyberspace – Position Paper’ (Auswärtiges Amt, March 2021) <www.auswaertiges-amt.de/blob/2446304/32e7b2498e10b74fb17204c54665bdf0/on-the-application-of-international-law-in-cyberspace-data.pdf>>Google Scholar
ICJ, ‘Speech by HE Mr Abdulqawi A Yusuf, President of the International Court of Justice, on the occasion of the Seventy-Third Session of the United Nations General Assembly’ (Statements by the President, 25 October 2018) <www.icj-cij.org/public/files/press-releases/0/000-20181025-PRE-02-00-EN.pdf>>Google Scholar
ICSID, ‘Database of Bilateral Investment Treaties’ (ICSID, 2022) <https://icsid.worldbank.org/resources/databases/bilateral-investment-treaties>>Google Scholar
Indian Government, ‘Ministry of Environment, Forest And Climate Change: Notification’ (Gazette of India, 23 March 2020) <http://environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Draft_EIA_2020.pdf>>Google Scholar
Italaw, ‘Expert (Legal Opinion)’ (Italaw, 2022) <www.italaw.com/browse/expert-legal-opinions>>Google Scholar
Lew, JDM, ‘Iura Novit Curia and Due Process’ (Queen Mary Law Research Paper Series No 72/2010, 1 January 2011) <http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1733531>CrossRef>Google Scholar
Mann, H, Van Moltke, K, Peterson LE & ors, ‘International Institute for Sustainable Development Model International Agreement on Investment for Sustainable Development, Negotiators Handbook’ (IISD, April 2006) <www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/investment_model_int_handbook.pdf>CrossRef>Google Scholar
Mileva, N, The Role of Customary International Law Interpretation in the Balancing of Interests at Sea: The Example of Prevention’ (TRICI-Law Research Paper Series 010/2020, 2020) <https://tricilawofficial.files.wordpress.com/2021/06/mileva_rps-010-2020.pdf>>Google Scholar
NAFTA Free Trade Commission, ‘Notes of Interpretation of Certain Chapter 11 Provisions’ (NAFTA FTC, 31 July 2001) <https://2009-2017.state.gov/documents/organization/38790.pdf>>Google Scholar
Neill, J, ‘Chorzów Factory and Beyond: Case Law Update’ (Landmark Chambers, August 2018) <www.landmarkchambers.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Presentation-JN-Chorzow-Factory.pdf>>Google Scholar
Neuberger, Ld, ‘Arbitration and Rule of Law’ (Address Before the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators Centenary Celebration, Hong Kong, 20 March 2015) <www.supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-150320.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Newcombe, A, ‘The Strange Case of Expert Legal Opinions in Investment Treaty Arbitrations’ (Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 18 March 2010) <http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2010/03/18/the-strange-case-of-expert-legal-opinions-in-investment-treaty-arbitrations/>>Google Scholar
Paddeu, F & Parlett, K, ‘COVID-19 and Investment Treaty Claims’ (Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 30 March 2020) <http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2020/03/30/covid-19-and-investment-treaty-claims>>Google Scholar
SCC, ‘2017 Arbitration Rules’ (SCC, 1 January 2020) <https://sccinstitute.com/media/1407444/arbitrationrules_eng_2020.pdf>>Google Scholar
Sender, O & Wood, M, ‘The International Court of Justice and Customary International Law: A Reply to Stefan Talmon’ (EJIL:Talk!, 30 November 2015) <www.ejiltalk.org/the-international-court-of-justice-and-customary-international-law-a-reply-to-stefan-talmon/>>Google Scholar
Sparks, T, Nedeski, N & Hernández, G, ‘Judging Climate Change Obligations: Can the World Court Rise to the Occasion? Part I: Primary Obligations to Combat Climate Change’ (Völkerrechtsblog, 30 April 2020) <https://voelkerrechtsblog.org/judging-climate-change-obligations-can-the-world-court-raise-the-occasion/>>Google Scholar
Sparks, T, Nedeski, N & Hernández, G, ‘Judging Climate Change Obligations: Can the World Court Rise to the Occasion? Part II: What Role for International Adjudication?’ (Völkerrechtsblog, 30 April 2020) <https://voelkerrechtsblog.org/judging-climate-change-obligations-can-the-world-court-raise-the-occasion-2/>>Google Scholar
Tzeng, P, ‘The Doctrine of Indispensable Issues: Mauritius v United Kingdom, Philippines v China, Ukraine v Russia, and Beyond’ (EJIL:Talk!, 14 October 2016) <www.ejiltalk.org/the-doctrine-of-indispensable-issues-mauritius-v-united-kingdom-philippines-v-china-ukraine-v-russia-and-beyond/>>Google Scholar
UNCITRAL, ‘Working Group III: Investor-State Dispute Settlement Reform’ (UNCITRAL, 2021) <https://uncitral.un.org/en/working_groups/3/investor-state>>Google Scholar
VanDuzer, JA, ‘Investor-State Dispute Settlement in CETA: Is It the Gold Standard?’ (CD Howe Institute Commentary No 459, 4 October 2016) <www.cdhowe.org/sites/default/files/attachments/research_papers/mixed/Commentary%20459.pdf>CrossRef>Google Scholar
Van Harten, G, ‘ISDS in the Revised CETA: Positive Steps, But Is It a “Gold Standard”?’ (CIGI Investor-State Arbitration Commentary Series, 20 May 2016) <www.cigionline.org/publications/isds-revised-ceta-positive-steps-it-gold-standard>>Google Scholar
Van Harten, G & ors, ‘Public Statement on the International Investment Regime’ (Osgoode Hall Law School, 31 August 2010) <www.osgoode.yorku.ca/public-statement-international-investment-regime-31-august-2010>>Google Scholar
WHO, ‘WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19’ (World Health Organization, 11 March 2020) <www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020>>Google Scholar
WHO, ‘Statement on the Fourth Meeting of the International Health Regulations (2005) Emergency Committee Regarding the Outbreak of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19)’ (WHO, 1 August 2020) <www.who.int/news/item/01-08-2020-statement-on-the-fourth-meeting-of-the-international-health-regulations-(2005)-emergency-committee-regarding-the-outbreak-of-coronavirus-disease-(covid-19)>>Google Scholar
Zarra, G, ‘Uses and Abuses of Authentic Interpretations of International Investment Agreements: Reflections on the Role of Arbitral Tribunals as Masters of the Judicial Function’ (EJIL:Talk!, 28 August 2020) <www.ejiltalk.org/uses-and-abuses-of-authentic-interpretations-of-international-investment-agreements-reflections-on-the-role-of-arbitral-tribunals-as-masters-of-the-judicial-function/>>Google Scholar
You have
Access
Open access