Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:53:27.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Adverse effects of conjugated alpha-linolenic acids (CLnA) on lipoprotein profile on experimental atherosclerosis in hamsters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2007

M. Plourde*
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1234, F-21000 Dijon, France INAF/STELA, Université Laval, Canada, G1K 7P4 Present address: Research Center on Aging, 1036 Belvédère sud, Sherbrooke, Québec, CanadaJ1H 4C4
M. Ledoux
Affiliation:
Unité Composition et Hygiène des Produits Laitiers, AFSSA, 23 Avenue du Général de Gaulle, F-94706 Maisons Alfort Cedex, France
S. Grégoire
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1234, F-21000 Dijon, France
L. Portois
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Experimental Surgery, ULB, Brussels, Belgium
J. J. Fontaine
Affiliation:
UP d’Histologie et Anatomie Pathologique, École Nationale Vétérinaire d’Alfort, F-94704 Maisons Alfort Cedex, France
Y. A. Carpentier
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Experimental Surgery, ULB, Brussels, Belgium
P. Angers
Affiliation:
INAF/STELA, Université Laval, Canada, G1K 7P4
J. M. Chardigny
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1019, Clermont-Ferrand, F-63000 France; CRNH Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, F-63000, France
J. L. Sébédio
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1019, Clermont-Ferrand, F-63000 France; CRNH Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, F-63000, France

Abstract

Conjugated linoleic acids (CLAs) such as rumenic acid (RA) have the potential to alter blood lipid profiles in animals and in humans. In contrast, physiological effects of conjugated α-linolenic acids (CLnAs), which concomitantly are omega-3 and conjugated fatty acids, are still unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of CLnA to interfere in early steps of atherosclerosis by altering lipoprotein profiles and fatty streaks in the aortas. F1B hamsters were fed a control or one of the three hypercholesterolemic (HC) diets: HC-control, HC-RA (18:2 cis-9, trans-11) or HC-CLnA (CLnA: equimolar mixture of 18:3 cis-9, trans-11, cis-15 and cis-9, trans-13, cis-15) diet. In low-cholesterol control-fed hamsters, the proportion of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was around 45% while in HC-fed hamsters, HDL-C was around 10% and cholesterol was mostly (80%) carried by triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRL). Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) triglycerides (TGs) increased by approximately 60% in hamsters fed either HC-RA or HC-CLnA compared with HC-controls but not compared with the low-cholesterol control diet. HDL cholesterol decreased by 24% and 16% in hamsters fed HC-RA and HC-CLnA, respectively. Small dense LDL-cholesterol increased by approximately 60% in hamsters fed HC-RA and HC-CLnA compared with the HC-control group and by more than a 100% compared with hamsters on the control diet. The relative percentage of liver cholesteryl ester content increased by 88% in hamsters fed HC diets compared with the control diet. Significant differences in fatty streaks were observed between control and HC-diet-fed hamsters. However, no significant difference was observed among the HC-diet-fed hamsters. This study shows that animals fed any one of the HC diets developed an adverse lipoprotein profile compared with a normolipidic diet. Also, HC-RA or HC-CLnA diets altered lipoprotein profile compared with animals fed the HC-control diet but had no beneficial effects on atherosclerosis.

Type
Full Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2007

Introduction

The term conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) refers to a class of positional and geometric conjugated dienoic isomers of linoleic acid (18:2n-6) of which rumenic acid (RA, 18:2 cis-9, trans-11) and 18:2 trans-10, cis-12 are the main constituents. CLAs have unique biological properties (McLeod et al., Reference McLeod, LeBlanc, Langille, Mitchell and Currie2004) among which an important but controversial observation is that CLA can alter lipoprotein metabolism and decrease the extent of atherosclerosis in experimental animals. For example, in rabbits, Lee et al. (Reference Lee, Kritchevsky and Pariza1994) demonstrated that a mixture of CLA isomers reduces both low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and arterial lipid accumulation. These effects were also later shown in rabbits fed a CLA mixture or single CLA isomers (such as RA or 18:2 trans-10, cis-12) provided in a semi-purified diet (Kritchevsky et al., Reference Kritchevsky, Tepper, Wright, Czarnecki, Wilson and Nicolosi2004). Similar data were also reported using hamsters (Nicolosi et al., Reference Nicolosi, Rogers, Kritchevsky, Scimeca and Huth1997; Gavino et al., Reference Gavino, Gavino, Leblanc and Tuchweber2000; Wilson et al., Reference Wilson, Nicolosi, Chrysam and Kritchevsky2000 and Reference Wilson, Nicolosi, Saati, Kotyla and Kritchevsky2006; Dorfman et al., Reference Dorfman, Smith, Osgood and Lichtenstein2003). CLA may also decrease the formation of fatty streaks in hamsters and rabbits (Lee et al., Reference Lee, Kritchevsky and Pariza1994; Kritchevsky et al., Reference Kritchevsky, Tepper, Wright, Czarnecki, Wilson and Nicolosi2004) and may help to attenuate atherosclerosis by inducing apoptosis in the atherosclerotic lesion in mice (Toomey et al., Reference Toomey, Harhen, Roche, Fitzgerald and Belton2006). However, a recent study on hamsters reported that there may be an isomer-dependent CLA effect in this rodent model (Macarulla et al., Reference Macarulla, Fernandez-Quintela, Zabala, Navarro, Echevarria, Churruca, Rodriguez and Portillo2005).

It is not completely clear whether RA or the 18:2 trans-10, cis-12 isomer is responsible for the biological effects of CLA. In humans, Tricon et al. (Reference Tricon, Burdge, Kew, Banerjee, Russell, Jones, Grimble, Williams, Yaqoob and Calder2004) reported that encapsulated RA (0.6–2.4 g/day) decreased the ratio of total cholesterol (TC):high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol while the 18:2 trans-10, cis-12 isomer had opposite effects. On the other hand, Desroches et al. (Reference Desroches, Chouinard, Galibois, Corneau, Delisle, Lamarche, Couture and Bergeron2005) detected no beneficial metabolic effects of a 10-fold CLA mixture enrichment of butter fat in overweight and obese men.

Recently, conjugated α-linolenic acids (CLnA) have been identified in milk fat (Destaillats et al., Reference Destaillats, Berdeaux, Sebedio, Juaneda, Gregoire, Chardigny, Bretillon and Angers2005b). They occur between 0.05% and 0.3% of total fatty acids in both milk (Destaillats et al., Reference Destaillats, Berdeaux, Sebedio, Juaneda, Gregoire, Chardigny, Bretillon and Angers2005b) and bovine muscle (unpublished results). CLnA combines both omega-3 and conjugated double bonds. Among the isomers, 18:3 cis-9, trans-11, cis-15 has the same conjugated double-bond system as RA. This CLnA isomer can be elongated and desaturated to a conjugated 22:6n-3 in rats following the same elongation/desaturation pathway used by α-linolenic acid (Destaillats et al., Reference Destaillats, Trottier, Galvez and Angers2005a; Plourde et al., Reference Plourde, Sergiel, Chardigny, Gregoire, Angers and Sebedio2006). In parallel, CLA isomers can also be elongated and desaturated, then further metabolised to produce various CLA-derived eicosanoids and other novel mediators that may exhibit biological activities in their own right (Pariza et al., Reference Pariza, Park and Cook2000). In fact, CLA and CLnA produce metabolites of different chain lengths, which may well be biologically active (Pariza et al., Reference Pariza, Park and Cook2000; Plourde et al., Reference Plourde, Sergiel, Chardigny, Gregoire, Angers and Sebedio2006). Moreover, CLnA concomitantly are omega-3 and conjugated fatty acids, both properties being suggested to have benefits towards atherosclerosis.

Actually, the potential of CLnA to affect atherosclerosis is unknown, so the aim of this study was to determine whether CLnA could inhibit early stages of atherosclerosis involving plasma lipoproteins profiles or early fatty streaks formation. We compared CLnA to RA and a control group using F1B hamsters given a hypercholesterolemic (HC) diet. This model was chosen since it is well known to develop fatty streaks in response to an HC diet (Dorfman et al., Reference Dorfman, Smith, Osgood and Lichtenstein2003) and was previously used to evaluate the impact of CLA (Nicolosi et al., Reference Nicolosi, Rogers, Kritchevsky, Scimeca and Huth1997).

Material and methods

Fatty acids

RA (85% pure, free fatty acid) was purchased from Natural Lipids (Hovdebygda, Norway) and was chosen for its structural resemblance to one CLnA isomer. CLnA (75% pure, free fatty acid) was an equimolar mixture of two major isomers, 18:3 cis-9, trans-11, cis-15 and cis-9, trans-13, cis-15 kindly donated by Naturia Inc. (Sherbrooke, Canada).

High oleic sunflower and linseed oils were provided by Lesieur (Asnières, France) and Robbe SA (Compiègne, France), respectively. Lard was purchased in a local market in France. A mixture of high oleic sunflower oil and linseed oil (98:2 w/w) was saponified with 1 mol/l KOH in ethanol (95%) at 50°C for 2 h in a reflux system. The resulting free fatty acids comprised 1% (g/kg) of the hypercholesterolemic control diet (HC-control).

Animals and diets

Male Golden Syrian F1B hybrid hamsters (n = 45; 8 weeks old; 103.3 ± 8.0 g; Biobreeders Inc., Fitchburg, MA, USA) were housed in groups of two and maintained in a controlled environment (22 ± 1°C; 55–60% relative humidity) with a 12-h light:dark cycle according to French regulations (Authorization #A21200 for the environment and 21CAE056 to JMC). They were acclimatised for 4 days with a semi-liquid diet composed of a powdered commercial chow-base in which 6% of a mixture of high oleic sunflower oil:linseed oil (98:2 w/w) was added. Following the acclimatisation time, the hamsters were randomly assigned to one of the four dietary groups. Three hamsters were fed a control normolipic diet (commercial rat/mice/hamster chow-base Augy, France) (Reeves et al., Reference Reeves, Nielsen and Fahey1993) in order to assess the efficiency of the HC diets. The remaining 42 hamsters were allocated to one of the three HC diets (n = 14 per group). The HC diets contain (g/kg) wheat starch 282.3, lipids 230, cholesterol 1.2, sucrose 205.3, casein 196.8, mineral mixture 42.8, cellulose 30.0 and vitamins mix 12.8. The 230 g/kg of lipids was divided as following: lard 200, sunflower oil 20 and high oleic sunflower oil:linseed oil 98:2 v/v, RA or ClnA-free fatty acids 10. The control and the HC diets were given as a semi-liquid mixture for 12 weeks. The fatty-acid composition of the four diets is given in Table 1.

Table 1 Fatty acid profile (%) of the control and the three hypercholesterolemic diets containing 23% (in weight) of lipids and 0.12% of cholesterol

Abbreviations are: HC-control = hypercholesterolemic control diet, HC-RA =hypercholesterolemic rumenic acid diet, HC-ClnA = hypercholesterolemic conjugated alpha-linolenic acids diet.

Fatty acid profile provided by the supplier.

§ Fatty acid profile done on two samples.

The animals were weighed twice a week. At the end of the experimental period, the hamsters were fasted for 16 h, weighed, anaesthetised using isofurane and ex-sanguinated by abdominal aortic blood puncture. Plasma was obtained after blood centrifugation (700 × g) at 4°C for 10 min and stored at −80°C until ultracentrifugation. The aortas were excised for analysis of fatty streaks (see later for more details) and livers were stored in chloroform:methanol (2:1 v/v) at −20°C for lipid extraction.

Lipoproteins analysis

Triglycerides (TG) and TC were measured in plasma and lipoprotein using enzymatic kits, triacylglycerol GPO-PAP and cholesterol PAP (Roche Diagnostics, Vilvoorde, Belgium), respectively. Plasma lipoproteins were isolated by sequential ultracentrifugation at 4°C using a Beckman TL 100 centrifuge (Beckman Instrument Inc., Fullerton, CA, USA) with a fixed-angle rotor (TLA 100.2, Beckman Instrument Inc.) (Havel et al., Reference Havel, Eder and Bragdon1955). The lipoproteins with a density lower than 1.063 g/ml were classified as LDL while the ones equal or above that density were classified as HDL. The LDL fraction was further separated at density ranges between 1.019 and 1.063 g/ml (Chapman et al., Reference Chapman, Laplaud, Luc, Forgez, Bruckert, Goulinet and Lagrange1988). LDL profiles were then determined by isopycnic ultracentrifugation. Briefly, the LDL fraction was adjusted to density = 1.040 g/ml and layered between potassium bromide solutions (containing EDTA and sodium azide 0.01%) of different densities (1.019, 1.025, 1.040, 1.054 and 1.085 g/ml) and centrifuged for 40 h (40 000 r.p.m.; 4°C) in a Beckman XL 100K ultracentrifuge equipped with a swinging bucket rotor (SW41Ti, Beckman Instrument Inc.). A high-density potassium bromide solution (1.29 g/ml) was then injected from the bottom of the tube (2232 Microperpex S Peristaltic Pump, LKB, Bromma, Sweden) to collect 25 subfractions (each of 450 μl) of increasing densities. Density and cholesterol content were measured in each subfraction as described above.

Liver lipid analysis

Liver total lipids were extracted using a mixture of chloroform/methanol 2:1 v/v (Folch et al., Reference Folch, Lees and Sloanestanley1957). Quantitative analysis of lipid classes were done using thin-layer chromatography coupled with flame ionisation detector (Sebedio and Juaneda, Reference Sebedio and Juaneda1991). The elution solvent used for the migration of the samples applied on the rods was composed of hexane/diethyl ether/glacial acetic acid (80:20:1 v/v/v).

Fatty streak analysis of the aorta

After ex-sanguination, the heart cavities and arteries were washed through the left ventricle using formalin 10% (v/v) at pH 7 under physiological pressure. The whole thoracic cage was then fixed for 24 h in formalin 10%. Following this period, the fixed aorta was dissected and stored in a phosphate-buffered saline solution at 4°C before staining. The whole aortic arch and descending aorta were then opened longitudinally from the anterior side. The tissues were washed with 70% isopropanol, stained for 15 min in Oil Red O (0.5% in 70% isopropanol) and then washed again for 30 s with isopropanol and distilled water. The aortas were then immersed a few seconds in a 1% toluidine blue solution before being rinsed with distilled water and opened on the posterior arch. The two half aortas were fixed on a slide and were examined with a light microscope (Leica DMR equipped with a Sony camera) under different magnifications. The picture acquisition used a Meteor II card and the Tribvn ICS 1.3.0.10 software. Four evaluators (unaware of the diet allocation) classified the aortic histological pictures into five groups in accordance with the extent of fatty streaks. Each aorta received a score between 0 and 4; aortas without any streak obtained 0 score, while maximal streaks scored 4. The qualitative representation of the data using symbols (+) was determined with the average score determined above. The scores above 2.5 received the mention +++.

Statistical analysis

Plasma and lipoprotein TG and TC as well as liver lipid class data were compared by a one-way ANOVA with NCSS 6.01 Software (Alsyd, Meylan, France). Post hoc analyses were done using the Newman–Keuls test. Values with a P ⩽ 0.05 were significant. Fatty streak scores were compared using the non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test.

Results

Animals

At the end of the experimental period, no difference in food intake or final BW was observed between hamsters fed the control or any of the three HC diets (Table 2). All the hamsters fed any one of the HC diets had liver steatosis as determined by their increased weight, increased total lipid per gram of liver and by their colour and shape (light pink instead of dark red and covered with red dots), compared with the hamster fed the control diet (data not shown).

Table 2 Mean ± s.e. for body weight (BW) (g) and food consumption (g/day) during the experimental period in hamsters fed a control or a hypercholesterolemic control, RA or CLnA diet

Abbreviations are: HC-control = hypercholesterolemic control diet, HC-RA =hypercholesterolemic rumenic acid diet, HC-ClnA = hypercholesterolemic conjugated alpha-linolenic acids diet.

Plasma lipids and lipoproteins

TC and TG in hamsters fed the control diet was significantly lower than in hamsters fed any one of the three HC diets (Table 3). The results obtained for TC and TG on plasma were higher than expected and, any of the three HC diets induce an atherogenic lipoprotein profile as seen by the high values for TC and total TG compared with control. HDL-C decreased by 24% and 16% in hamsters fed HC-RA and HC-ClnA, respectively, compared with the HC-control diet. Plasma TG content was significantly higher (38%) in animals fed HC-CLnA compared with the HC-control diet. Plasma LDL-TG increased by 70% in hamsters fed the HC-RA or HC-CLnA diets compared with the HC-control but were similar to control-fed hamsters.

Table 3 Means ± s.e. for plasma triglyceride (TG) and cholesterol (mg/dl) concentrations of hamsters fed a control or a hypercholesterolemic control, RA or CLnA diet

a,b,c Values not sharing the same letters are significantly different (P < 0.05).

Abbreviations are: HC-control = hypercholesterolemic control diet, HC-RA = hypercholesterolemic rumenic acid diet, HC-ClnA = hypercholesterolemic conjugated alpha-linolenic acids diet.

TRL = triglyceride-rich lipoprotein, LDL = low-density lipoprotein, HDL = high-density lipoprotein.

TC content in the small dense low-density lipoprotein (sdLDL, d ⩾ 1.040 g/ml) fraction was approximately 60% higher in animals fed HC-RA and HC-CLnA diets compared with HC-control animals and more than a 100% compared with the control diet (Table 4; Figure 1). The sdLDL profile in hamsters fed the control diet was lower than the HC groups because of the lower LDL TC content.

Table 4 Means ± s.e. for total cholesterol content (μmol/l) of low-density lipoproteins (LDL) separated by discontinuous density gradient in hamsters fed a control or a hypercholesterolemic control, RA or CLnA diet

a,b Values in rows having similar superscripts are not statistically different (P > 0.05).

Abbreviations are: HC-control = hypercholesterolemic control diet, HC-RA =hypercholesterolemic rumenic acid diet, HC-ClnA = hypercholesterolemic conjugated alpha-linolenic acids diet.

sdLDL = small dense low-density lipoproteins.

Figure 1 Density profiles of low-density lipoproteins of hamsters fed a control or a hypercholesterolemic control, RA or CLnA diet. The partition number 15 corresponds to a density of 1.040 g/ml. HC-control = hypercholesterolemic control diet, HC-RA = hypercholesterolemic rumenic acid diet, HC-CLnA = hypercholesterolemic conjugated alpha-linolenic acids diet, TC = plasma total cholesterol.

Liver lipids

The relative % of cholesterol esters (CE) in liver of animals fed the HC diets increased by 88% compared with the control diet (Figure 2). This lower relative % of CE in livers of hamsters fed the control diet was balanced by a 58% and 66% increase in phospholipid (PL) and TG, respectively when compared with the HC diets. Among the three HC diets, no significant difference was observed in the liver CE, TG, free cholesterol or PL content.

Figure 2 Liver lipid class profile (%) of hamsters fed a control or a hypercholesterolemic control, RA or CLnA diet. Results are expressed as mean of 14 independent values ± s.e. HC-control = hypercholesterolemic control diet, HC-RA = hypercholesterolemic rumenic acid diet, HC-CLnA = hypercholesterolemic conjugated alpha-linolenic acids diet, CE = cholesterol esters, TG = triglycerides, PL = phospholipids.

Fatty streaks

The aortas fatty streaks score was 94% higher in hamsters fed the HC diets compared with the control diet. No significant difference was observed among the three HC groups, even though the scores tended to be slightly lower in the RA group (Table 5).

Table 5 Hamster aorta fatty streaks scores following a control or a hypercholesterolemic control, RA or CLnA diet

Abbreviations are: HC-control = hypercholesterolemic control diet, HC-RA =hypercholesterolemic rumenic acid diet, HC-ClnA = hypercholesterolemic conjugated alpha-linolenic acids diets.

Discussion

In the present study, we did not observe any beneficial effect of an HC diet containing RA and CLnA on plasma lipids and aorta fatty streaks compared with an HC control group. However, we showed that plasma TG and TC of the hamsters fed any one of the HC diets was increased compared with the hamsters fed the control diet. TC of hamsters fed the HC diets was mainly carried by plasma triglyceride-rich lipoprotein (TRL) instead of HDL as in the control-fed animals. Also, the HC diets increased several risk factors, and these animals had fatty streaks in the aortas. Their liver lipid content was also associated with a higher level of CE compared with the control diet. This suggests a modification in cholesterol metabolism leading to early steps of atherosclerosis when hamsters were fed an HC diet.

In our experimental conditions, HC-CLnA decreased the HDL-C in plasma similar to HC-RA. There was no beneficial effect on lipoprotein profile and fatty streaks in the aortas of animals fed the HC-CLnA diet. However, this result did not exclude the beneficial effects of CLnA on early steps of atherosclerosis in animals, considering that the effect of a single CLnA isomer has not yet been investigated. In fact, the overall activity of a CLnA mixture may be directed by one of the two isomers as demonstrated in a previous study (Plourde et al., Reference Plourde, Sergiel, Chardigny, Gregoire, Angers and Sebedio2006). Only the c-9, t-11, c-15 18:3 isomer is metabolised to conjugated 20:5n-3 and 22:6n-3 isomers and this may have a greater role in biochemical and signalisation pathways as was hypothesised for other conjugated fatty acids (Valeille et al., Reference Valeille, Gripois, Blouquit, Souidi, Riottot, Bouthegourd, Serougne and Martin2004). It has already been shown that CLA isomers can also be elongated and desaturated, then further metabolised to produce various CLA-derived eicosanoids and other novel mediators that may exhibit biological activities in their own right (Pariza et al., Reference Pariza, Park and Cook2000). However, even if both isomers are metabolised, it is not completely clear right now which one is the more potent to affect atherosclerosis and modulate lipoproteins in animals and humans. Thus, the utilisation of a CLnA mixture in this study may have had an impact on the overall activity of the isomers and the results would have probably been different if we had to use single pure isomers.

In this study, we decided to use only RA as one CLA isomer because of its structural similarities with one CLnA isomer (18:3 cis-9, trans-11, cis-15). Moreover, RA may be more active in preventing atherosclerosis in animals (Valeille et al., Reference Valeille, Gripois, Blouquit, Souidi, Riottot, Bouthegourd, Serougne and Martin2004; Lock et al., Reference Lock, Horne, Bauman and Salter2005). A diet containing 18:2 trans-10, cis-12 appears to have a profound proatherogenic effect, while RA impeded the development of atherosclerosis in mice (Arbones-Mainar et al., Reference Arbones-Mainar, Navarro, Guzman, Arnal, Surra, Acin, Carnicer, Osada and Roche2006), an effect possibly explained by increased epithelial permeability with trans-10, cis-12 but not with RA (Roche et al., Reference Roche, Terres, Black, Gibney and Kelleher2001).

Although the beneficial effects of CLA and possibly CLnA in hamsters seem to be isomer-dependent, other experimental conditions and design could also have had a major influence on the results (Yoganathan et al., Reference Yoganathan, Wilson and Nicolosi1998; Dorfman et al., Reference Dorfman, Smith, Osgood and Lichtenstein2003; Macarulla et al., Reference Macarulla, Fernandez-Quintela, Zabala, Navarro, Echevarria, Churruca, Rodriguez and Portillo2005; Wilson et al., Reference Wilson, Nicolosi, Saati, Kotyla and Kritchevsky2006). For example, gene expression for receptors is sensitive to the hamster strain and to the lipid composing the diet (Loison et al., Reference Loison, Mendy, Serougne and Lutton2002). The hamster strain used in this study is recognised as forming fatty streaks and to be more sensitive to HC diets (Dorfman et al., Reference Dorfman, Smith, Osgood and Lichtenstein2003). It is also a good model because of its association with a higher activity of cholesterol ester transfer protein than other rodents (Tsutsumi et al., Reference Tsutsumi, Hagi and Inoue2001). However, in this study, the hamsters showed higher TC concentrations than elsewhere although it was the same hamster strain and approximately the same experimental design (Wilson et al., Reference Wilson, Nicolosi, Chrysam and Kritchevsky2000). This may relate in part to the housing conditions (two by two) used in this experiment, which seems to have affected plasma lipid concentrations and early atherogenesis as previously reported by Yoganathan et al. (Reference Yoganathan, Wilson and Nicolosi1998). However, it can also be related to the amount of other fats in the diet, which could largely modify the lipoprotein profile when supplemented with CLA (Valeille et al., Reference Valeille, Gripois, Blouquit, Souidi, Riottot, Bouthegourd, Serougne and Martin2004). In this context, the introduction of 20% lard in our HC diet instead of 20% coconut oil may have created an important fatty-acid modification interfering with CLA properties. The high fat content of the HC diets may also have induced an early propensity to atherosclerosis as seen by the high CE in liver and the fatty streaks. This result has not been noticed in other studies such as that of Valeille et al. (Reference Valeille, Gripois, Blouquit, Souidi, Riottot, Bouthegourd, Serougne and Martin2004) showing beneficial effects of RA on atherosclerosis. This may explain in part the different potential of RA to influence proatherogenic TC concentrations and aortic fatty streaks formation. The high TC found in hamsters fed the HC-RA or HC-CLnA resulted in higher proportion of sdLDL, which are possibly associated with the increase in fatty streaks formation. It has already been reported that sdLDL are more sensitive to oxidation and transformation into endothelial wall (Hamilton, Reference Hamilton1997) and may increase fatty streak formation. This study shows that HC hamsters had more sdLDL and fatty streaks than control-fed hamsters but no difference was observed among the HC-diet-fed hamsters.

In conclusion, using hamsters, we did not find that feeding an HC diet enriched in either RA or CLnA lowers proatherogenic TC concentrations compared with HC controls. These results suggest that RA or CLnA do not beneficially modify the lipoprotein profile or fatty streak formation in F1B hamsters fed an HC diet. Our results differ from other data on hamsters supplemented with RA (Nicolosi et al., Reference Nicolosi, Rogers, Kritchevsky, Scimeca and Huth1997; Valeille et al., Reference Valeille, Gripois, Blouquit, Souidi, Riottot, Bouthegourd, Serougne and Martin2004). In this study, the pronounced atherogenic status of hamsters fed one of the HC diet compared with the animals fed the control diet may explain in part the discrepancy of our results compared with other literature. Regarding CLnA, further work will be needed to see how single CLnA isomers could influence atherosclerosis and lipoprotein profile in other experimental conditions.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Fonds Québécois de Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies (FQRNT) and Naturia Inc. (Sherbrooke, Canada) for a Ph.D. scholarship to M. Plourde.

References

Arbones-Mainar, JM, Navarro, MA, Guzman, MA, Arnal, C, Surra, JC, Acin, S, Carnicer, R, Osada, J, Roche, HM 2006. Selective effect of conjugated linoleic acid isomers on atherosclerotic lesion development in apolipoprotein E knockout mice. Atherosclerosis 189, 318327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapman, MJ, Laplaud, PM, Luc, G, Forgez, P, Bruckert, E, Goulinet, S, Lagrange, D 1988. Further resolution of the low density lipoprotein spectrum in normal human plasma: physicochemical characteristics of discrete subspecies separated by density gradient ultracentrifugation. Journal of Lipid Research 29, 442458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Desroches, S, Chouinard, PY, Galibois, I, Corneau, L, Delisle, J, Lamarche, B, Couture, P, Bergeron, N 2005. Lack of effect of dietary conjugated linoleic acids naturally incorporated into butter on the lipid profile and body composition of overweight and obese men. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 82, 309319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Destaillats, F, Berdeaux, O, Sebedio, JL, Juaneda, P, Gregoire, S, Chardigny, JM, Bretillon, L, Angers, P 2005a. Metabolites of conjugated isomers of alpha-linolenic acid (CLnA) in the rat. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 53, 14221427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Destaillats, F, Trottier, JP, Galvez, JMG, Angers, P 2005b. Analysis of alpha-linolenic acid biohydrogenation intermediates in milk fat with emphasis on conjugated linolenic acids. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 32313239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dorfman, SE, Smith, DE, Osgood, DP, Lichtenstein, AH 2003. Study of diet-induced changes in lipoprotein metabolism in two strains of Golden-Syrian hamsters. Journal of Nutrition 133, 41834188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folch, J, Lees, M, Sloanestanley, GH 1957. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. Journal of Biological Chemistry 226, 497509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gavino, VC, Gavino, G, Leblanc, MJ, Tuchweber, B 2000. An isomeric mixture of conjugated linoleic acids but not pure cis-9, trans-11-octadecadienoic acid affects body weight gain and plasma lipids in hamsters. Journal of Nutrition 130, 2729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, CA 1997. Low-density lipoprotein and oxidised low-density lipoprotein: their role in the development of atherosclerosis. Pharmacology and Therapeutics 74, 5572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Havel, J, Eder, HA, Bragdon, H 1955. The distribution and chemical composition of ultracentrifugally separated lipoproteins in human serum. Journal of Clinical Investigation 34, 13451353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kritchevsky, D, Tepper, SA, Wright, S, Czarnecki, SK, Wilson, TA, Nicolosi, RJ 2004. Conjugated linoleic acid isomer effects in atherosclerosis: growth and regression of lesions. Lipids 39, 611616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, KN, Kritchevsky, D, Pariza, MW 1994. Conjugated linoleic acid and atherosclerosis in rabbits. Atherosclerosis 108, 1925.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lock, AL, Horne, CA, Bauman, DE, Salter, AM 2005. Butter naturally enriched in conjugated linoleic acid and vaccenic acid alters tissue fatty acids and improves the plasma lipoprotein profile in cholesterol-fed hamsters. Journal of Nutrition 135, 19341939.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loison, C, Mendy, F, Serougne, C, Lutton, C 2002. Dietary myristic acid modifies the HDL-cholesterol concentration and liver scavenger receptor BI expression in the hamster. British Journal of Nutrition 87, 199210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macarulla, MT, Fernandez-Quintela, A, Zabala, A, Navarro, V, Echevarria, E, Churruca, I, Rodriguez, VM, Portillo, MP 2005. Effects of conjugated linoleic acid on liver composition and fatty acid oxidation are isomer-dependent in hamster. Nutrition 21, 512519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLeod, RS, LeBlanc, AM, Langille, MA, Mitchell, PL, Currie, DL 2004. Conjugated linoleic acids, atherosclerosis, and hepatic very-low-density lipoprotein metabolism. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 79, 1169S1174S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicolosi, RJ, Rogers, EJ, Kritchevsky, D, Scimeca, JA, Huth, PJ 1997. Dietary conjugated linoleic acid reduces plasma lipoproteins and early aortic atherosclerosis in hypercholesterolemic hamsters. Artery 22, 266277.Google ScholarPubMed
Pariza, MW, Park, Y, Cook, ME 2000. Mechanisms of action of conjugated linoleic acid: evidence and speculation. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 223, 813.Google ScholarPubMed
Plourde, M, Sergiel, JP, Chardigny, JM, Gregoire, S, Angers, P, Sebedio, JL 2006. Absorption and metabolism of conjugated alpha-linolenic acids given as free fatty acids or triacylglycerols in rats. Nutrition and Metabolism 3, 8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reeves, PG, Nielsen, FH, Fahey, GC 1993. AIN-93 purified diets for laboratory rodents: final report of the American Institute of Nutrition ad hoc writing committee on the reformulation of the AIN-76A rodent diet. Journal of Nutrition 123, 19391951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roche, HM, Terres, AM, Black, IB, Gibney, MJ, Kelleher, D 2001. Fatty acids and epithelial permeability: effect of conjugated linoleic acid in Caco-2 cells. Gut 48, 797802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sebedio, JL, Juaneda, P 1991. Quantitative lipid analyses using the new Iatroscan TLC–FID system. Journal of Planar Chromatography – Modern TLC 4, 3541.Google Scholar
Toomey, S, Harhen, B, Roche, HM, Fitzgerald, D, Belton, O 2006. Profound resolution of early atherosclerosis with conjugated linoleic acid. Atherosclerosis 187, 4049.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tricon, S, Burdge, GC, Kew, S, Banerjee, T, Russell, JJ, Jones, EL, Grimble, RF, Williams, CM, Yaqoob, P, Calder, PC 2004. Opposing effects of cis-9, trans-11 and trans-10, cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid on blood lipids in healthy humans. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 80, 614620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsutsumi, K, Hagi, A, Inoue, Y 2001. The relationship between plasma high density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and cholesteryl ester transfer protein activity in six species of healthy experimental animals. Biological and pharmaceutical bulletin 24, 579581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valeille, K, Gripois, D, Blouquit, MF, Souidi, M, Riottot, M, Bouthegourd, JC, Serougne, C, Martin, JC 2004. Lipid atherogenic risk markers can be more favourably influenced by the cis-9, trans-11-octadecadienoate isomer than a conjugated linoleic acid mixture or fish oil in hamsters. British Journal of Nutrition 91, 191199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, TA, Nicolosi, RJ, Chrysam, M, Kritchevsky, D 2000. Conjugated greater than linoleic acid in hypercholesterolemic hamsters. Nutrition Research 20, 17951805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, TA, Nicolosi, RJ, Saati, A, Kotyla, T, Kritchevsky, D 2006. Conjugated linoleic acid isomers reduce blood cholesterol levels but not aortic cholesterol accumulation in hypercholesterolemic hamsters. Lipids 41, 4148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoganathan, S, Wilson, TA, Nicolosi, RJ 1998. Housing conditions effect plasma lipid concentrations and early atherogenesis independent of treatment in hamsters. Nutrition Research 18, 8392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Fatty acid profile (%) of the control and the three hypercholesterolemic diets containing 23% (in weight) of lipids and 0.12% of cholesterol

Figure 1

Table 2 Mean ± s.e. for body weight (BW) (g) and food consumption (g/day) during the experimental period in hamsters fed a control or a hypercholesterolemic control, RA or CLnA diet

Figure 2

Table 3 Means ± s.e. for plasma triglyceride (TG) and cholesterol (mg/dl) concentrations of hamsters fed a control or a hypercholesterolemic control, RA or CLnA diet

Figure 3

Table 4 Means ± s.e. for total cholesterol content (μmol/l) of low-density lipoproteins (LDL) separated by discontinuous density gradient in hamsters fed a control or a hypercholesterolemic control, RA or CLnA diet

Figure 4

Figure 1 Density profiles of low-density lipoproteins of hamsters fed a control or a hypercholesterolemic control, RA or CLnA diet. The partition number 15 corresponds to a density of 1.040 g/ml. HC-control = hypercholesterolemic control diet, HC-RA = hypercholesterolemic rumenic acid diet, HC-CLnA = hypercholesterolemic conjugated alpha-linolenic acids diet, TC = plasma total cholesterol.

Figure 5

Figure 2 Liver lipid class profile (%) of hamsters fed a control or a hypercholesterolemic control, RA or CLnA diet. Results are expressed as mean of 14 independent values ± s.e. HC-control = hypercholesterolemic control diet, HC-RA = hypercholesterolemic rumenic acid diet, HC-CLnA = hypercholesterolemic conjugated alpha-linolenic acids diet, CE = cholesterol esters, TG = triglycerides, PL = phospholipids.

Figure 6

Table 5 Hamster aorta fatty streaks scores following a control or a hypercholesterolemic control, RA or CLnA diet