Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:45:14.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Digital Media and the Dual Aspect of Adolescent Identity Development

The Effects of Digital Media Use on Adolescents’ Commitments and Self-Stories

from Part II - Digital Media in the Adolescent Developmental Context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2022

Jacqueline Nesi
Affiliation:
Brown University, Rhode Island
Eva H. Telzer
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Mitchell J. Prinstein
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Summary

We suggest studying how using social media affects adolescent identity development to understand the mechanism of the impact of social media on adolescent mental health. We present a model of the dual aspect of adolescent identity development – the progression towards the formation of self-evaluated commitments and values and construction of a coherent life story – and discuss how using social media facilitates or hinders processes involved, namely introspection, storytelling, and dialogue. Social media topics include dialogue with a diverse group of people, censorship, the permanence of social media data, potent social norms and values, and emphasis on appearance. Future research should develop methods for studying narratives on social media and establish the adolescent development of a narrative identity. We also suggest examining the affordances of social media platforms and how they affect processes of identity development. The chapter calls for media developers to design social media environments that support identity development.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/

Concerns abound about the impact of social media on adolescents as it increasingly becomes an integral part of their social lives. One of the concerns that has received a great deal of attention is the impact of social media on adolescents’ mental health (Gordon, Reference Gordon2020). A large number of studies have been conducted to investigate the impact; however, the findings are mixed, showing both positive and negative impact (Baker & Algorta, Reference Baker and Algorta2016; Best et al., Reference Best, Manktelow and Taylor2014; Seabrook et al., Reference Seabrook, Kern and Rickard2016). What is clear in this growing body of research with seemingly contradictory findings is that the relation between social media use and adolescent mental health is much more complex than originally thought. In line with the recognition of this complexity, more and more researchers examine the mechanism of this relation within the framework of a psychological theory (Keles et al., Reference Keles, McCrae and Grealish2019).

Adolescent Identity Development on Social Media

In a recent theoretical review, Granic et al. (Reference Granic, Morita and Scholten2020) suggested that, in order to understand the impact of digital media on adolescents’ mental health, it is essential to consider their core developmental concern: identity development. For decades, developmental psychologists have studied the challenging transition adolescents are expected to make in order to become functional members of society – that is, moving past identifying with the roles and values of others and toward making social commitments that are in accord with their own interests, aptitudes, and values (Erikson, Reference Erikson1968; Kroger, Reference Kroger2004). Whether or not adolescents successfully make this transition has important implications for their mental health (e.g., Azmitia et al., Reference Azmitia, Syed and Radmacher2013; Kuiper et al., Reference Kuiper, Kirsh and Maiolino2016). Since a considerable proportion of identity development processes is now taking place on social media, it is important to examine how the use of social media affects these processes.

A Model of Adolescent Identity Development

To present a model of adolescent identity development, we build on the theoretical framework proposed by Granic et al. (Reference Granic, Morita and Scholten2020). In this framework, progression toward (a) commitment to person–society integrated values and (b) the construction of a coherent life story constitutes adolescent identity development. The framework specifies key factors at intrapersonal, interpersonal, and cultural levels that shape adolescent identity development. Key factors at the intrapersonal level are psychological needs that drive adolescents to uphold and unite personal and social values and form a coherent life story. Key interpersonal factors are the characteristics of narrative partners that affect how adolescents construct and develop stories about themselves. Finally, key cultural factors are cultural values, norms, and narratives that set the boundaries within which adolescents explore and make commitment choices. This chapter focuses on processes at the interpersonal level, where intrapersonal and cultural factors intersect, as these processes are most pertinent to social media. Specifically, we discuss narrative and dialogical processes as an interpersonal mechanism of identity development (Hammack, Reference Hammack2008; McLean & Pasupathi, Reference McLean and Pasupathi2012). Through sharing self-stories with others, individuals encounter various perspectives, reflect on and learn about themselves, and consolidate or change their commitments, values, and narratives. Furthermore, we clearly differentiate between the subjective and objective aspects of identity by drawing on McAdams’s (Reference McAdams, Westenberg, Blasi and Cohn1998) exposition of the self-as-subject (meaning-making process) and the self-as-object (product of the meaning-making process). We explain how the two aspects of identity develop together through narrative and dialogical processes (see Figure 3.1).

Figure 3.1 The dual aspect of adolescent identity development and narrative and dialogical processes

Chapter Overview

We begin by describing the subjective aspect of identity development: changes in commitments and values.1 We explain how conventional commitments change to self-evaluated commitments during adolescence and the key role of introspection in this transition. We then describe the objective aspect of identity development: changes in a self-story, or narrative identity. We explain the process of constructing a coherent life story during adolescence and the function of narrative partners in this process. After the description of each aspect of adolescent identity development, we discuss how the use of social media may facilitate or hinder the key processes involved. Since the field of identity development is just beginning to incorporate social media in its research, our discussion will consist mainly of hypothetical links between social media use and adolescent identity development. However, the paucity of research in this area also means there are many avenues for future research. Therefore, the chapter concludes with future directions for studying the impact of social media use on adolescent identity development.

The Subjective Aspect of Identity Development: Changes in Commitments and Values

Identity is first and foremost the self as subject. Although developmental psychologists have taken different approaches to conceptualizing and studying the subjective self and its changes, there are some commonalities in their descriptions (Kroger, Reference Kroger2004). In this chapter we focus on Erikson’s (Reference Erikson1968) theory of the life cycle and Loevinger’s (Reference Loevinger1976) theory of ego development. Erikson laid out a series of crises that people face in their lifetime and must resolve for proper functioning and development. Although he described all the crises as having some bearing on identity, he characterized the fifth one – which takes place in adolescence – as a major crisis for identity. Erikson conceptualized identity in several different ways. However, later psychologists have focused on his conception of identity as ideological and occupational commitments and expanded it to include interpersonal commitments (e.g., Luyckx et al., Reference Luyckx, Goossens and Soenens2006; Marcia, Reference Marcia1966).

Loevinger (Reference Loevinger1976) also developed a theory of changes in the subjective self, namely ego development theory. Unlike Erikson’s theory, Loevinger’s theory is not built around chronological age, and therefore the ego stages are not tied to age-related challenges and tasks. The theory describes changes in various aspects of the self, such as impulse control, conscious preoccupations, and cognitive and interpersonal styles. At its core, ego development theory is about changes in an individual’s frame of reference, the values in accordance with which an individual makes experience meaningful and coherent (Hy & Loevinger, Reference Hy and Loevinger1996). In short, changes in commitments and values constitute the subjective aspect of identity development.

The Formation of Self-Evaluated Commitments in Adolescence

Identity development is a lifelong process. Throughout life, identity undergoes qualitative changes (Kroger, Reference Kroger2004). However, particular attention has been paid to the type of identity that is thought to mark the entrance to adulthood. According to Erikson’s (Reference Erikson1968) theory of the life cycle, childhood is a period in which individuals learn the roles of adults around them and focus on becoming skillful at preparatory tasks provided by their family, school, and community. Children are therefore identified with the roles and values of others in the immediate environment. In adolescence, psychological needs and social demands drive individuals to explore different occupations and ideologies in the larger society and commit to occupations and ideologies that match their own interests, aptitudes, and values to find their niche in society. This serves as the foundation for adulthood.

It is now widely recognized that identity exploration and commitment are iterative processes (Bosma & Kunnen, Reference Bosma and Kunnen2001; Grotevant, Reference Grotevant1987; Kerpelman et al., Reference Kerpelman, Pittman and Lamke1997; Luyckx et al., Reference Luyckx, Goossens and Soenens2006). For example, Luyckx et al. (Reference Luyckx, Goossens and Soenens2006, Reference Luyckx, Klimstra, Duriez, Van Petegem and Beyers2013) suggested that identity formation involves two cycles. The first one consists of exploration in breadth and commitment-making. In this cycle, individuals explore various values and goals and make initial commitments. The second cycle consists of exploration in depth and identification with commitment. Specifically, current commitments are continually re-evaluated through self-reflection and interpersonal dialogue, and if individuals feel confident about their commitments, they identify with them.

A similar developmental sequence can be found in Loevinger’s (Reference Loevinger1976) ego development theory: progression from the Conformist stage to the Conscientious stage via the Self-Aware stage. At the Conformist stage, social belonging is of paramount importance, and most effort is put into gaining acceptance by a social group. Individuals at this stage conform to the norms and values of their social groups, which are based on external characteristics (e.g., physical appearance, outward behavior). Thus, they seek social acceptance and recognition by trying to look or behave in a socially desirable manner. At the next, Self-Aware stage, individuals begin to explore inner aspects of themselves, and conformity starts to become less rigid. When the next, Conscientious stage is reached, individuals have gained a rich understanding of their motives and personality traits. Individuals at this stage therefore evaluate and commit to social values based on their internal characteristics (i.e., the formation of self-evaluated commitments; Loevinger, Reference Loevinger1987). Although ego development was conceptualized independently of chronological age, research has shown that the progression from the Conformist stage toward the Conscientious stage commonly takes place during adolescence (Syed & Seiffge-Krende, Reference Syed and Seiffge-Krenke2015; Westenberg & Gjerde, Reference Westenberg and Gjerde1999).

In sum, the transition from conventional commitments to self-evaluated commitments constitutes the subjective aspect of adolescent identity development. This transition is marked by changes in the mode of commitment – from conformity to self-evaluated commitment – and the nature of commitments – from external to internal characteristics.

Identity Exploration and Introspection

Exploration to gain an understanding of one’s environment and oneself is considered a key mechanism of identity development (Grotevant, Reference Grotevant1987). Erikson (Reference Erikson1968) emphasized the importance of psychosocial moratorium, the period during which adolescents explore different ideologies and occupations in society and find suitable ones. Such exploration entails introspection to find out one’s own interests, values, and aptitudes. In Loevinger’s (Reference Loevinger1976) ego development, we have seen that progression from the Conformist stage to the Conscientious stage goes through the Self-Aware stage, where individuals begin introspection to gain a deeper understanding of their internal characteristics. In order to move on from rigid conformity, individuals must shift their focus from external to internal aspects of themselves to understand their own interests and values, which they can then use to evaluate and choose social values to commit to. Indeed, introspection was found to be the most common factor in identity development (Kroger & Green, Reference Kroger and Green1996).

The capacity for introspection begins to develop in adolescence (Sebastian et al., Reference Sebastian, Burnett and Blakemore2008), making it a sensitive period for cultivating the capacity. Counseling, psychotherapy, and educational programs have been used to aid adolescents’ identity exploration (Kroger, Reference Kroger2004). Marcia (Reference Marcia1989) suggested that it is important to create an open and safe environment that encourages free exploration and serves as a safety net if adolescents’ choices go awry. Indeed, it has long been noted that open and accepting relationships are crucial in facilitating self-exploration (Rogers, Reference Rogers1961). As we discuss later in the chapter, identity exploration and introspection often happen during or following interpersonal dialogue, and the characteristics of conversational partners greatly affect the extent to which individuals engage in self-exploration and gain insights into themselves.

Social Media and the Adolescent Development of Commitments and Values

We have explained the adolescent development of commitments and values: the transition from conventional to self-evaluated commitments. We now discuss how the use of social media may affect this transition. To reiterate, identity exploration and introspection inherent in the exploration are a key mechanism through which adolescents move on from conformity and preoccupation with external characteristics and form self-evaluated commitments. Therefore, the use of social media would facilitate the transition if it supports identity exploration and introspection. Conversely, the use of social media would hinder the transition if it prevents identity exploration and introspection, increases conformity, and makes adolescents fixated on appearance.

A Playground for Identity Exploration

Social media provides the opportunity for people to try out different versions of themselves and see what feels right (Casserly, Reference Casserly2011). When asked about who they are on social media, people often report that they have different personas depending on the platform (Zhong et al., Reference Zhong, Chang, Karamshuk, Lee and Sastry2017). This may be because different platforms tend to attract different audiences by virtue of their design and functionality. For example, Instagram may be well suited to expressing people’s artistic side and therefore popular among artists, while Reddit may cater to their contemplative, intellectual side and attract curious minds and experts. The beauty of social media is therefore that all platforms taken together serve as a playground in which individuals can explore different aspects of themselves. However, there is also the downside of a plethora of options: Too many options can create paralysis and lead to ruminative exploration, keeping adolescents from completing the cycle of identity formation (Beyers & Luyckx, Reference Beyers and Luyckx2016). As we have discussed, successful adolescent identity development requires not only exploration of commitment options but also introspection to evaluate whether these options fit one’s personality. Therefore, social media platforms that provide space for identity exploration as well as self-reflection may be more conducive to identity development than those that provide space for the former only.

Potent Social Norms and Values

While social media offers plenty of opportunities for identity exploration, the large scale of social media also enables potent social norms and values, potentially making it more difficult for adolescents to move on from conformity. Most adolescents in the pre–social media era are likely to have negotiated with trends and conventions that manifested themselves in a relatively small social group, at most on a national scale. With social media, however, adolescents now have the possibility to observe trends on a much larger global scale, likely experiencing greater pressure to conform to these trends. Indeed, norms and values on social media may have stronger influence than those offline because they are more widely shared and more readily accessed (Nesi et al., Reference Nesi, Choukas-Bradley and Prinstein2018).

Social attitudes that currently prevail in Western cultures and may be magnified by social media are anti-mainstream sentiments (Vinh, Reference Vinh2021). Those who follow counterculture movements are usually called hippies or hipsters, going against what – in their eyes – everyone else is doing. One reflection of this trend is the popularity of prank videos on social media, in which people violate social conventions and norms for entertainment. The anti-mainstream sentiments have appealed to so many people that they themselves have become the norm and the source of conformity. Thus, social media can spread and magnify trends rapidly to create potent social norms and values, including those that espouse anti-mainstream sentiments.

Inescapable Past Selves

An essential condition for identity development is the freedom to leave behind old identities and explore new ones. Unfortunately, such freedom is not always guaranteed on the Internet. What people say and do on the Internet is permanently recorded and often remains on the Internet for future generations to unearth (Eichhorn, Reference Eichhorn2019; Nesi et al., Reference Nesi, Telzer and Prinstein2020). This permanence of information on the Internet, especially on social media, can be problematic for identity development (see Davis & Weinstein, Reference Davis, Weinstein and Wright2017). Traces of old identities on social media can mislead others into thinking that the old identities still hold true and make it difficult for individuals to change or to fully embrace the change. There is the increasing occurrence of people being criticized or getting fired for what they said or did on the Internet in the past even though these views or deeds no longer reflect them (e.g., Arora, Reference Arora2021). Accordingly, there are signs of adolescents and young adults erasing their social media posts for fear of repercussions (Davis & Weinstein, Reference Davis, Weinstein and Wright2017; Jargon, Reference Jargon2020; Smith, Reference Smith2013). These privacy issues therefore seem to be making it difficult for individuals to free themselves from the past and move forward.

However, reminders of one’s past selves may also benefit identity development. In adolescent years, individuals may go through many different phases. For example, an adolescent may experience the “goth” phase from age 15 to 16 years, reflected in a series of photos of a black-clothed self with plaid skirts and chains. From age 17 to 18 years, this adolescent may be absorbed in environmentalism, reflected in posts and photos depicting community efforts and environmental protests. Transition between such phases may sometimes feel fluent and smooth and may be easily forgotten. Snippets of social media content and interactions in the past can help individuals recall parts of their past selves that they may otherwise have forgotten. Being reminded of past selves can also help individuals reflect on the development they have gone through and understand that identity is never permanent and continues to change over time (Pasupathi et al., Reference Pasupathi, Mansour and Brubaker2007). It is nonetheless important that the right to social media data belong to users so that they can access their past data when they want to and they can erase them if they deem them harmful to their current identity.

A Tool for Distraction or Introspection?

One of the concerns that social media has generated is that it may act as a distraction from oneself (The School of Life, n.d.). Social media is filled with information about people’s lives and world events, and passive usage of social media (e.g., reading news feeds) is more common than active usage (e.g., posting status updates; Verduyn et al., Reference Verduyn, Lee and Park2015). The implication is that people are focused mainly on other people’s lives on social media, leaving little room to reflect on their own lives and gain insights into themselves. Furthermore, information overload on social media, which has been shown to lead to “social media fatigue” in some (Bright et al., Reference Bright, Kleiser and Grau2015; Dhir et al., Reference Dhir, Kaur, Chen and Pallesen2019), may deplete cognitive resources necessary for digesting information and integrating it into a sense of self. Indeed, Misra and Stokols (Reference Misra and Stokols2012) found that individuals who experienced an overload of digital information spent less time on contemplative activities such as self-reflection.

Nevertheless, social media has some functionalities that could help people gain insights into themselves. For example, Facebook’s “Year in Review” posts provide users with a chance to reflect on their life experiences in the past year. Such reflection may bring people insights into what kind of things they value and are interested in and what they are good at. Furthermore, as we discuss later, social media significantly increases the chance to receive feedback about oneself from others (e.g., boyd & Heer, Reference boyd and Heer2006), thereby deepening self-understanding.

Emphasis on Appearance

Another important issue to consider is the extent to which social media promotes preoccupation with appearance. Although social media can be used for a variety of purposes, posting pictures of one’s physical appearance (i.e., selfies) is popular among adolescents, and many adolescents are preoccupied with how others perceive their physical appearance on social media (Boursier & Manna, Reference Boursier and Manna2018; Choukas-Bradley et al., Reference Choukas-Bradley, Nesi, Widman and Galla2020). The increasing use of clickbaits to attract followers on social media may also be contributing to their perceived importance of appearance and superficial impressions. Preoccupation with appearance on social media is associated with a number of negative mental health indices among adolescents (Choukas-Bradley et al., Reference Choukas-Bradley, Nesi, Widman and Galla2020). While having a healthy body image is important, adolescent identity development entails a shift in the source of self-esteem from external to internal attributes. Therefore, social media is likely to be harmful to adolescents to the extent that it makes them fixated on appearance.

The design and affordances of social media platforms may affect the degree to which adolescents focus on external aspects of themselves. For example, photo-based social media platforms such as Instagram may attract those who are concerned with physical appearance, and consequently social values and norms that revolve around physical appearance may be more prevalent on these platforms. Therefore, the use of photo-based platforms may put adolescents at higher risk of being influenced by appearance-based values and norms. Furthermore, given that individuals can explore and express their internal characteristics more easily using concepts and words rather than images, text-based platforms such as Reddit and Tumblr might be more conducive to introspection and the expression of inner qualities. It is nonetheless important to note that the nonverbal expression of internal characteristics is possible (e.g., an expression of creativity in dancing), and photo-based platforms can also serve as a place for more mature expressions of identity.

The Objective Aspect of Identity Development: Changes in a Narrative Identity

Thus far, we have discussed the subjective aspect of identity development: changes in commitments and values. We now turn to the objective aspect, manifestations of the changes. Commitments and values manifest themselves in several ways. For example, people strive to fulfill their commitments and values; therefore, commitments and values are manifested in goal-striving (Maslow, Reference Maslow1970; Schwartz, Reference Schwartz, Seligman, Olson and Zanna1996). Moreover, values act as a frame of reference in perception to create “coherent meanings in experience” (Hy & Loevinger, Reference Hy and Loevinger1996, p. 4). Thus, they are reflected in the meanings that individuals assign to objects and events. When this meaning-making process is applied to past experiences, it often takes the form of storytelling. A story about the self that an individual creates based on their past experiences has been termed “narrative identity” (McAdams, Reference McAdams2018; Singer, Reference Singer2004). In storytelling, individuals make sense of and organize their past experiences by relating them to important aspects of themselves (Pasupathi et al., Reference Pasupathi, Mansour and Brubaker2007). In other words, past experiences that are relevant to one’s goals and values (i.e., self-defining memories) make up the main contents of a narrative identity (Blagov & Singer, Reference Blagov and Singer2004; Singer et al., Reference Singer, Blagov, Berry and Oost2013). In short, commitments and values (identity-as-subject) act as the guiding principles of storytelling to make sense of and organize past experiences into a narrative identity (identity-as-object; see Figure 3.1).

The Construction of a Coherent Life Story in Adolescence

As adolescents’ commitments change from conventional to self-evaluated commitments, corresponding changes likely occur in their narrative identities. During adolescence, a narrative identity changes from relatively disjointed descriptions of roles and habits to an autobiographical narrative, which demonstrates more complex reflective thinking and a causal understanding of one’s life experiences (Habermas & de Silveira, Reference Habermas and de Silveira2008; McAdams, Reference McAdams, Westenberg, Blasi and Cohn1998). Specifically, adolescents’ narrative identities increasingly take the form of a life story, which tells how the past self has grown into the present self, which may then become an envisioned future self (McAdams, Reference McAdams2018; McAdams & McLean, Reference McAdams and McLean2013). Their past, present, and future become clearly differentiated and yet causally connected to form a temporally coherent life story (Habermas & Bluck, Reference Habermas and Bluck2000; Pasupathi et al., Reference Pasupathi, Mansour and Brubaker2007). In addition to temporal coherence, there is another type of coherence that likely emerges in adolescents’ narrative identities: person–society coherence (Syed & McLean, Reference Syed and McLean2016). This type of coherence shows alignment between individuals’ personal attributes and their social contexts. As discussed earlier, adolescent identity development is progression toward commitment to social values that match personal interests, values, and talents. Therefore, narrative identities likely exhibit temporal and person–society coherence toward the end of adolescent development, weaving together the past self that was identified with the roles and values of others, the present self that commits to person–society integrated values, and the future self that will fulfill these values.

Besides these structural changes, adolescent identity development is likely to be accompanied by related changes in the theme of a narrative identity. Granic et al. (Reference Granic, Morita and Scholten2020) suggested that the dynamics of the needs for agency and communion shift during adolescence and that this shift may be reflected in the relative prominence on agency versus communion themes in a narrative identity. Specifically, as adolescents start to engage in self-exploration and gain better insight into their own interests and values, a predominance of communion themes may give way to a predominance of agency themes (see Van Doeselaar et al., Reference Van Doeselaar, McLean, Meeus, Denissen and Klimstra2020, for some indirect support for this). Toward the end of adolescent identity development, when the needs for agency and communion become more balanced, agency and communion themes may become relatively equalized and united in a narrative identity.

Another theme that is relevant to adolescent identity development is external versus internal focus. As discussed earlier, the nature of commitments changes from external to internal characteristics during adolescence. Therefore, the theme of adolescents’ narrative identities is likely to change from that of trying to look good and behave properly to that of cultivating their inner traits.

Dialogue and the Function of Narrative Partners

Storytelling is inherently a social activity and therefore usually involves dialogue (Hammack, Reference Hammack2008; Hermans, Reference Hermans2004). A narrative identity expressed in storytelling can be affirmed or challenged, which may in turn consolidate, weaken, or change commitments and values (McLean & Pasupathi, Reference McLean and Pasupathi2012; Thorne, Reference Thorne2000; see Figure 3.1). Thus, storytelling and dialogue are an important mechanism of identity development. Whether storytelling and dialogue contribute meaningfully to identity development depends heavily on the characteristics of their narrative partners (McLean et al., Reference McLean, Pasupathi and Pals2007; Pasupathi & Hoyt, Reference Pasupathi and Hoyt2009). There are three essential functions that narrative partners serve: (a) elaboration, (b) grappling, and (c) attention and validation (Granic et al., Reference Granic, Morita and Scholten2020).

First, narrative partners help people elaborate on their stories (Fivush et al., Reference Fivush, Haden and Reese2006; Pasupathi et al., Reference Pasupathi, Mansour and Brubaker2007). To construct a meaningful and coherent life story from past experiences, you must derive meaning from these experiences, and a simple recounting of past experiences is often insufficient (Blagov & Singer, Reference Blagov and Singer2004; Singer et al., Reference Singer, Blagov, Berry and Oost2013). Therefore, narrative partners’ requests for elaboration are essential. Blagov and Singer (Reference Blagov and Singer2004) specified four dimensions of self-defining memories, which have implications for elaboration requests. Specifically, elaboration requests are likely to be especially helpful if they use a time frame most conducive to meaning-making in a given situation (e.g., “Tell me exactly what happened in that moment”; “How did you change during your college years?”) and ask about affect, or more specifically, emotional valence and intensity (e.g., “How did the experience make you feel?”; “How much impact did the experience have on you?”), content, or the relevance to values and goals (e.g., “Why is the experience important to you?”; “How does the experience help you achieve your goals?”), and meaning, or learning and growth (e.g., “What did you learn from the experience?”; “How did the experience change you as a person?”).

The second important function of narrative partners is “grappling”, which is an act of supporting identity exploration in a dialogue while maintaining an attitude of open-mindedness and patience (Granic et al., Reference Granic, Morita and Scholten2020). Engaging in dialogue with others is essentially identity exploration because different people uphold different values and you are encouraged to take others’ perspectives in dialogue (Hermans, Reference Hermans2004). Your values and narratives may sometimes be challenged in the process, and listening to alternative views may bring new insights and weaken or change your values and commitments. However, such a challenge is likely most fruitful when it is done in an open and accepting relationship (Rogers, Reference Rogers1961). Moreover, it is important that narrative partners remain patient despite unexpected perspective changes and contradictions, which are due to occur during identity exploration (Granic et al., Reference Granic, Morita and Scholten2020).

Finally, narrative partners provide attention and affirmation. When narrative partners listen attentively and affirm your life story, your values and goal endeavors are reflected back to you and become consolidated (McLean & Pasupathi, Reference McLean and Pasupathi2012; Pasupathi & Rich, Reference Pasupathi and Rich2005). Those who show interest and give you affirmation are usually the ones who share your values and commitments. As discussed earlier, adolescent identity development is considered complete when they find their niche in society, where like-minded others share the interests and values that adolescents have discovered through self-exploration (Erikson, Reference Erikson1968). Therefore, finding narrative partners who share personal values and aspirations is important especially toward the end of adolescent identity development.

Social Media and the Adolescent Development of a Narrative Identity

We have discussed how commitments and a narrative identity develop together through storytelling and dialogue in adolescence. In this section we explore different ways in which social media can support or obstruct storytelling and dialogue, thereby facilitating or hindering the adolescent development of a narrative identity.

Dialogue with Diverse Groups of People

Social media emerged with the advent of the Web 2.0, a dramatic change of the Internet from a place for passive consumption to active participation, interaction, and collaboration (Peters, Reference Peters2020). Anyone who has access to the Internet can express and share their views and stories on social media, and there are usually others – sometimes hundreds and thousands of people – who validate or reject their views and stories. Storytelling and dialogue in such a large, interconnected social environment have never existed before. Social media has made it easy to have dialogue with people who come from different cultures and backgrounds, thus significantly increasing the chance of encountering different perspectives. Since taking different perspectives during social interaction is essential for identity development (Hermans, Reference Hermans2004; Kroger, Reference Kroger2004), social media can be a great tool for adolescents’ identity development. While there is some concern about the increasing frequency of conflicts resulting from the increased contact with diverse groups of people, conflicts can be meaningful experiences and contribute to identity development, especially if they are managed with understanding (Rogers, Reference Rogers1961). Therefore, the presence of moderators who are discerning but also empathetic would be valuable.

Censorship

There has been growing concern and controversy surrounding censorship on social media (Heins, Reference Heins2014). Social media platforms such as Twitter and YouTube recently came under fire after deleting posts or banning users and channels that express certain ideological views (e.g., BBC News, 2020; Zaru, Reference Zaru2021). Social media companies have long suggested that their platforms provide a space for the free exchange of views and ideas. However, it has become apparent that these platforms are not neutral public platforms, but rather, just like traditional media, they promote certain content and suppress others according to their interests and ideologies (Lewis, Reference Lewis2021). Although social media companies began to acknowledge such editorial actions, it remains largely unclear how they are curating content. As we have just discussed, dialogue with diverse groups of people plays an essential role in identity development. Therefore, if social media platforms exercise editorial power, it is important that they make their decisions transparent so that people can make informed decisions about which platforms to use for a meaningful dialogue.

Narrative Elaboration on Social Media

Social media platforms generally support the elaboration of narratives as they provide comment sections and encourage dialogue between users. However, the unique affordances of social media platforms may affect the extent to which users elaborate on their stories. For example, Twitter sets a strict character limit for posts and comments and may therefore hinder the elaboration of narratives and deep dialogue compared to platforms like Facebook, Reddit, and Tumblr. Indeed, in an in-depth interview with activists, Comunello et al. (Reference Comunello, Mulargia and Parisi2016) found that the activists perceived platform affordances as having a significant impact on their ability to express themselves, with one of them reporting that the possibility to write longer texts allowed him to better articulate his opinions. Misunderstandings between users may be more common on platforms that restrict the length of posts and comments because short posts and comments do not easily allow clarification of meaning. Such platforms might predispose users to insult each other instead of asking each other questions to elaborate on their self-stories.

Attention and Validation on Social Media

Social media offers unprecedented opportunities to be listened to and validated by others. Before social media, individuals whose values and beliefs deviated from the norm had difficulty finding someone who would listen to or affirm their views (e.g., Gray, Reference Gray2009). It is now much easier to find like-minded others because social media platforms such as Facebook and Reddit enable people to search for various communities. This is, for example, reflected in online activism by various groups of people (Bennett, Reference Bennett2014; Buell Hirsch, Reference Buell Hirsch2014; Sandoval-Almazan & Gil-Gracia, Reference Sandoval-Almazan and Gil-Garcia2014). However, the downside of such diverse and specific communities is that they can create echo chambers and shun interaction outside the communities (Singer, Reference Singer2020). An optimal social media environment may therefore be that which makes it easy to find like-minded people while encouraging communication and interaction between diverse groups.

Attention and validation are most effective if they come from close people (Carr et al., Reference Carr, Wohn and Hayes2016). Hayes et al. (Reference Hayes, Carr and Wohn2016) found that people experienced more personal support on platforms that allowed them to easily narrow their audience and share posts with close friends (e.g., Snapchat). Therefore, adolescents who are in the phase of identity consolidation may benefit more by using platforms that make it easy to target posts to close friends.

Future Research Directions

Now that we have presented a theoretical model of adolescent identity development and discussed how the use of social media may facilitate or hinder the development, we suggest a few directions for future research. First, it is important to study how narrative identities typically develop during adolescence. Since many adolescents currently use social media for identity expressions (i.e., narrative identities), it is possible to examine the adolescent development of a narrative identity on social media (Granic et al., Reference Granic, Morita and Scholten2020). Although social media platforms have tightened restrictions on data access over the past few years (e.g., Facebook Business, 2018; Hemsley, Reference Hemsley2019), private data download options and application programming interfaces remain a viable avenue for collecting social media data for research (Lomborg & Bechmann, Reference Lomborg and Bechmann2014; Taylor & Pagliari, Reference Taylor and Pagliari2018). Adolescents’ social media posts can be analyzed with research methods that have been developed to study narrative identities (Adler et al., Reference Adler, Dunlop and Fivush2017). The narrative research framework specifies how to code narrative identities in terms of structure (e.g., coherence) and theme (e.g., agency, communion). New coding manuals need to be developed for themes that are relevant to adolescent identity development but not included in the framework (e.g., external versus internal focus). It is important to note, however, that people are not given narrative prompts to elicit detailed information on social media. Therefore, it may be necessary to use an additional method such as an interview to fully understand what is being expressed in social media posts. Alternatively, researchers may develop an application to add narrative prompts to social media posts. Once the methods are developed, researchers can conduct longitudinal studies to examine how the structure and theme of narrative identities change during adolescence.

Another important direction for future research is to study how the design and affordances of social media platforms affect key processes of identity development (introspection, elaboration, grappling, attention, and validation). For this line of research, it is important to first examine the unique affordances and features of different social media platforms. For example, researchers may assess the diversity of communities on social media platforms (see, e.g., Bisgin et al., Reference Bisgin, Agarwal and Xu2012; De Salve et al., Reference De Salve, Guidi, Ricci and Mori2018, for the methods). To assess the processes of identity development, researchers can code adolescents’ posts as well as others’ comments and reactions by using or adapting existing methods for studying these processes (e.g., Pasupathi & Hoyt, Reference Pasupathi and Hoyt2009; Pasupathi & Rich, Reference Pasupathi and Rich2005) or developing new ones.

However, like the analysis of narrative identities, the study of identity development processes may require more than social media data (especially introspection, which does not easily manifest itself). It would therefore be best to combine the coding of social media content with other methods that probe individuals’ experiences on social media (e.g., interviews). One useful approach is the stimulated recall method, in which interviews are conducted around objective data to aid the recollection of experiences associated with the data (Bloom, Reference Bloom1953). Using social media data as memory cues can facilitate the recollection of thoughts and feelings that occurred during the use of social media (Griffioen et al., Reference Griffioen, Van Rooij, Lichtwarck-Aschoff and Granic2020).

Finally, a worthwhile research direction is to develop applications that support key identity development processes and examine whether they facilitate adolescents’ identity development. For example, researchers may design an application based on the four dimensions of self-defining memories (Blagov & Singer, Reference Blagov and Singer2004) to help the meaning-making and organization of past experiences:

  • Affect: Users can rate the emotional valence and intensity of social media posts so that they can gain insights into what kind of events have an impact on them and the nature and degree of the impact.

  • Content: Users can assign value and commitment tags to their social media posts so that they can make explicit connections between their values and commitments and their life experiences.

  • Meaning: Social media posts are accompanied by narrative prompts so as to help users derive meaning from their experiences and construct a meaningful and coherent narrative identity.2

  • Time specificity: Users’ social media posts can be displayed in different time frames (e.g., a given moment in time, day, week, month, year, and life stage) so that users can create narratives in these different time frames and later integrate these narratives into a life story.

After applications are developed, researchers can conduct studies (e.g., randomized control trials) to evaluate their efficacy in facilitating adolescent identity development. It is recommended that researchers take person-specific effects into account when evaluating the effects of social media (e.g., see Valkenburg et al., Reference Valkenburg, Beyens, Pouwels, van Driel and Keijsers2021).

Conclusion

In this chapter we have suggested that it is important to study how the use of social media affects adolescent identity development in order to understand the mechanism of the impact of social media on adolescent mental health. We presented a model of the dual aspect of adolescent identity development – progression toward the formation of self-evaluated commitments and values and the construction of a coherent life story – and discussed how the use of social media may facilitate or hinder the key processes involved, namely introspection, storytelling, and dialogue. It was suggested that future research should devise methods for studying narratives on social media and discover how narrative identities develop during adolescence. We also suggested examining the design and affordances of social media platforms and how they affect the key processes of identity development. We hope that this chapter will provide a useful framework for future research on the impact of social media on adolescents and encourage media developers to design social media environments that support identity development.

References

Adler, J. A., Dunlop, W. L., Fivush, R., et al. (2017). Research methods for studying narrative identity: A primer. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(5), 519527. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617698202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arora, R. (2021, March 27). If Teen Vogue can fire an editor for her teenage tweets, no one is safe. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2021/03/27/if-alexi-mccammond-can-be-fired-for-teenage-tweets-nobodys-safe/Google Scholar
Azmitia, M., Syed, M., & Radmacher, K. (2013). Finding your niche: Identity and emotional support in emerging adults’ adjustment to the transition to college. Journal of Research in Adolescence, 23(4), 744761. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, D. A., & Algorta, G. P. (2016). The relationship between online social networking and depression: A systematic review of quantitative studies. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(11), 638648. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0206CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BBC News. (2020, February 27). YouTube ‘not a public forum’ with guaranteed free speech. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-51658341Google Scholar
Bennett, L. (2014). ‘If we stick together we can do anything’: Lady Gaga fandom, philanthropy and activism through social media. Celebrity Studies, 5(1–2), 138152. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2013.813778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, P., Manktelow, R., & Taylor, B. (2014). Online communication, social media and adolescent wellbeing: A systematic narrative review. Children and Youth Services Review, 41, 2736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.03.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyers, W., & Luyckx, K. (2016). Ruminative exploration and reconsideration of commitment as risk factors for suboptimal identity development in adolescence and emerging adulthood. Journal of Adolescence, 47, 169178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.10.018CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bisgin, H., Agarwal, N., & Xu, X. (2012). A study of homophily on social media. World Wide Web, 15, 213232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280–011-0143-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blagov, P. S., & Singer, J. S. (2004). Four dimensions of self-defining memories (specificity, meaning, content, and affect) and their relationships to self-restraint, distress, and repressive defensiveness. Journal of Personality, 72(3), 481511. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00270.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloom, B. S. (1953). Thought-processes in lectures and discussions. Journal of General Education, 7(3), 160169.Google Scholar
Bosma, H. A., & Kunnen, E. S. (2001). Determinants and mechanisms in ego identity development: A review and synthesis. Developmental Review, 21(1), 3966. https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.2000.0514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boursier, V., & Manna, V. (2018). Selfie expectancies among adolescents: Construction and validation of an instrument to assess expectancies toward selfies among boys and girls. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 839. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00839CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
boyd, d., & Heer, J. (2006, January 4–7). Profiles as conversation: Networked identity performance on Friendster [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kunai, HI, United States. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2006.394Google Scholar
Bright, L. F., Kleiser, S. B., & Grau, S. L. (2015). Too much Facebook? An exploratory examination of social media fatigue. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 148155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buell Hirsch, P. (2014). Clicks or commitment: activism in the age of social media. Journal of Business Strategy, 35(5), 5558. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-07-2014-0086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, C. T., Wohn, D. Y., & Hayes, R. A. (2016). as social support: Relational closeness, automaticity, and interpreting social support from paralinguistic digital affordances in social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 385393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casserly, M. (2011, January 26). Multiple personalities and social media: The many faces of me. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/meghancasserly/2011/01/26/multiple-personalities-and-social-media-the-many-faces-of-me/Google Scholar
Choukas-Bradley, S., Nesi, J., Widman, L., & Galla, B. M. (2020). The Appearance-Related Social Media Consciousness Scale: Development and validation with adolescents. Body Image, 33, 164174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.02.017CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Comunello, F., Mulargia, S., & Parisi, L. (2016). The ‘proper’ way to spread ideas through social media: Exploring the affordances and constraints of different social media platforms as perceived by Italian activists. The Sociological Review, 64(3), 515532. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, K., & Weinstein, E. C. (2017). Identity development in the digital age: An Eriksonian perspective. In Wright, M. F. (Ed.), Identity, sexuality, and relationships among adults in the digital age (pp. 17). IGI Global.Google Scholar
De Salve, A., Guidi, B., Ricci, L., & Mori, P. (2018). Discovering homophily in online social networks. Mobile Networks and Applications, 23(6), 17151726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036–018-1067-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhir, A., Kaur, P., Chen, S., & Pallesen, S. (2019). Antecedents and consequences of social media fatigue. International Journal of Information Management, 48, 193202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichhorn, K. (2019). The end of forgetting: Growing up with social media. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. Norton.Google Scholar
Facebook Business. (2018, April 4). Restricting data access and protecting people’s information on Facebook. https://www.facebook.com/business/news/restricting-data-access-and-protecting-peoples-information-on-facebookGoogle Scholar
Fivush, R., Haden, C. A., & Reese, E. (2006). Elaborating on elaborations: Role of maternal reminiscing style in cognitive and socioemotional development. Child Development, 77(6), 15681588. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00960.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon, S. (2020, July 13). 5 ways social media affects teen mental health. Verywell Family. https://www.verywellfamily.com/ways-social-media-affects-teen-mental-health-4144769Google Scholar
Granic, I., Morita, H., & Scholten, H. (2020). Beyond screen time: Identity development in the digital age. Psychological Inquiry, 31(3), 195223. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2020.1820214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, M. L. (2009). Out in the country: Youth, media, and queer visibility in rural America. New York University Press.Google Scholar
Griffioen, N., Van Rooij, M. M., Lichtwarck-Aschoff, A., & Granic, I. (2020). A stimulated recall method for the improved assessment of quantity and quality of social media use. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(1), Article e15529. https://doi.org/10.2196/15529CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grotevant, H. D. (1987). Toward a process model of identity formation. Journal of Adolescent Research, 2(3), 203222. https://doi.org/10.1177/074355488723003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, T., & Bluck, S. (2000). Getting a life: The emergence of the life story in adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 748769. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.748CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Habermas, T., & de Silveira, C. (2008). The development of global coherence in life narratives across adolescence: Temporal, causal, and thematic aspects. Developmental Psychology, 44(3), 707721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.3.707CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hammack, P. L. (2008). Narrative and the cultural psychology of identity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(3), 222247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308316892CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, R. A., Carr, C. T., & Wohn, D. Y. (2016). It’s the audience: Differences in social support across social media. Social Media + Society, 2(4), 112. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116678894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heins, M. (2014, June 20). The brave new world of social media censorship. Harvard Law Review. https://harvardlawreview.org/2014/06/the-brave-new-world-of-social-media-censorshipGoogle Scholar
Hemsley, J. (2019, July 11). Social media giants are restricting research vital to journalism. Columbia Journalism Review. https://www.cjr.org/tow_center/facebook-twitter-api-restrictions.phpGoogle Scholar
Hermans, H. J. M. (2004). Introduction: The dialogical self in a global and digital age. An International Journal of Theory and Research, 4(4), 297320. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532706xid0404_1Google Scholar
Hy, L. X., & Loevinger, J. (1996). Measuring ego development (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Jargon, J. (2020, February 20). Teens are deleting Instagrams almost as fast as they post them. Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/teens-are-deleting-instagrams-almost-as-fast-as-they-post-them-11582021801Google Scholar
Keles, B., McCrae, N., & Grealish, A. (2019). A systematic review: The influence of social media on depression, anxiety and psychological distress in adolescents. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25(1), 7993. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2019.1590851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerpelman, J. L., Pittman, J. F., & Lamke, L. K. (1997). Toward a microprocess perspective on adolescent identity development: An identity control theory approach. Journal of Adolescent Research, 12(3), 325346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743554897123002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroger, J. (2004). Identity in adolescence: The balance between self and other (3rd ed.). Routledge.Google Scholar
Kroger, J., & Green, K. E. (1996). Events associated with identity status change. Journal of Adolescence, 19(5), 477490. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.1996.0045CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuiper, N., Kirsh, G., & Maiolino, N. (2016). Identity and intimacy development, humor styles, and psychological well-being. Identity, 16(2), 115125. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2016.1159964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, B. (2021, January 17). The Trump ban across social media wasn’t censorship – it was a series of editorial decisions by media companies that call themselves social platforms. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-ban-wasnt-censorship-it-was-an-editorial-decision-2021-1?international=true&r=US&IR=TGoogle Scholar
Loevinger, J. (1976). Ego development: Conceptions and theories. Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Loevinger, J. (1987). Paradigms of personality. Freeman.Google Scholar
Lomborg, S., & Bechmann, A. (2014). Using APIs for data collection on social media. The Information Society, 30(4), 256265. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2014.915276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luyckx, K., Goossens, L., & Soenens, B. (2006). A developmental contextual perspective on identity construction in emerging adulthood: Change dynamics in commitment formation and commitment evaluation. Developmental Psychology, 42(2), 366380. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.2.366CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luyckx, K., Klimstra, T. A., Duriez, B., Van Petegem, S., Beyers, W. (2013). Personal identity processes from adolescence through the late 20s: Age trends, functionality, and depressive symptoms. Social Development, 22(4), 701721. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego-identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3(5), 551558. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023281CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcia, J. E. (1989). Identity and intervention. Journal of Adolescence, 12(4), 401410. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-1971(89)90063-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality (2nd ed.). Harper & Row.Google Scholar
McAdams, D. P. (1998). Ego, trait, identity. In Westenberg, P. M., Blasi, A., & Cohn, L. D. (Eds.), Personality development: Theoretical, empirical, and clinical investigations of Loevinger’s conception of ego development (pp. 2738). Erlbaum.Google Scholar
McAdams, D. P. (2018). Narrative identity: What is it? What does it do? How do you measure it? Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 37(3), 359372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276236618756704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdams, D. P., & McLean, K. C. (2013). Narrative identity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(3), 233238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413475622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, K. C., & Pasupathi, M. (2012). Processes of identity development: Where I am and how I got there. Identity, 12(1), 828. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2011.632363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, K. C., Pasupathi, M., & Pals, J. L. (2007). Selves creating stories creating selves: A process model of self-development. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(3), 262278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868307301034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misra, S., & Stokols, D. (2012). Psychological and health outcomes of perceived information overload. Environment and Behavior, 44(6), 737759. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511404408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesi, J., Choukas-Bradley, S., & Prinstein, M. J. (2018). Transformation of adolescent peer relations in the social media context: Part 2 – Application to peer group processes and future directions for research. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 21(3), 295319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567–018-0262-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nesi, J., Telzer, E. H., & Prinstein, M. J. (2020). Adolescent development in the digital media context. Psychological Inquiry, 31(3), 229234. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2020.1820219CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pasupathi, M., & Hoyt, T. (2009). The development of narrative identity in late adolescence in emergent adulthood: The continued importance of listeners. Developmental Psychology, 45(2), 558574. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014431CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pasupathi, M., Mansour, E., & Brubaker, J. R. (2007). Developing a life story: Constructing relations between self and experience in autobiographical narratives. Human Development, 50(2–3), 85110. https://doi.org/10.1159/000100939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasupathi, M., & Rich, B. (2005). Inattentive listening undermines self-verification in personal storytelling. Journal of Personality, 73(4), 10511085. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00338.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peters, K. (2020, October 20). Web 2.0. Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/w/web-20.aspGoogle Scholar
Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy. Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2014). Towards cyberactivism 2.0? Understanding the use of social media and other information technologies for political activism and social movements. Government Information Quarterly, 31(3), 365378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1996). Value priorities and behavior: Applying a theory of integrated value system. In Seligman, C., Olson, J. M., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), The Ontario Symposium: Vol. 8. The psychology of values (pp. 124). Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Seabrook, E. M., Kern, M. L., & Rickard, N. S. (2016). Social networking sites, depression, and anxiety: A systematic review. JMIR Mental Health, 3(4), Article e50. https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.5842CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sebastian, C., Burnett, S., & Blakemore, S.-J. (2008). Development of the self-concept during adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(11), 441446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singer, J. A. (2004). Narrative identity and meaning making across the life span: An introduction. Journal of Personality, 72(3), 437460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00268.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, J. A. (2020). Narrative identity in a digital age: What are the human risks? Psychological Inquiry, 31(3), 224228. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2020.1820217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, J. A., Blagov, P., Berry, M., & Oost, K. M. (2013). Self-defining memories, scripts, and the life story: Narrative identity in personality and psychotherapy. Journal of Personality, 81(6), 569582. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, C. (2013, August 5). Three out of four young adults delete social media posts over fears they could harm their careers. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/young-adults-delete-social-media-posts-2013-8?international=true&r=US&IR=TGoogle Scholar
Syed, M., & McLean, K. C. (2016). Understanding identity integration: Theoretical, methodological, and applied issues. Journal of Adolescence, 47, 109118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.09.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Syed, M., & Seiffge-Krenke, I. (2015). Change in ego development, coping, and symptomatology from adolescence to emerging adulthood. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 41, 110119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2015.09.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J., & Pagliari, C. (2018). Mining social media data: How are research sponsors and researchers addressing the ethical challenges? Research Ethics, 14(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117738559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The School of Life (n.d.). How to live more wisely around our phones. https://www.theschooloflife.com/thebookoflife/how-to-live-more-wisely-around-our-phones/Google Scholar
Thorne, A. (2000). Personality memory telling and personality development. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(1), 4556. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0401_5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valkenburg, P. M., Beyens, I., Pouwels, J. L., van Driel, I. I., & Keijsers, L. (2021). Social media and adolescents’ self-esteem: Heading for a person-specific media effects paradigm. Journal of Communication, 71(1), 5678. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Doeselaar, L., McLean, K. C., Meeus, W., Denissen, J. J. A., & Klimstra, T. A. (2020). Adolescents’ identity formation: Linking the narrative and the dual-cycle approach. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(4), 818835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964–019-01096-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verduyn, P., Lee, D. S., Park, J., et al. (2015). Passive Facebook usage undermines affective well-being: Experimental and longitudinal evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(2), 480488. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000057CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vinh, N. (2021, February 10). Does counter culture still exist? The Western Front. https://www.westernfrononline.com/2021/02/10/does-counterculture-still-exist/Google Scholar
Westenberg, P. M., & Gjerde, P. F. (1999). Ego development during the transition from adolescence to young adulthood: A 9-year longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Personality, 33(2), 233252. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1999.2248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaru, D. (2021, January 13). Trump Twitter ban raises concerns over ‘unchecked’ power of big tech. ABC News. https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-twitter-ban-raises-concerns-unchecked-power-big/story?id=75150689Google Scholar
Zhong, C., Chang, H. W., Karamshuk, D., Lee, D., & Sastry, N. (2017, May 15–18). Wearing many (social) hats: How different are your different social network personae? Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Web and Social Media, Montreal, QC, Canada.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 3.1 The dual aspect of adolescent identity development and narrative and dialogical processes

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×