Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:04:35.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Homotopy nilpotency of localized spheres and projective spaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2021

Marek Golasiński*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Warmia and Mazury, Słoneczna 54 Street, Olsztyn10-710, Poland (marekg@matman.uwm.edu.pl)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For the $p$-localized sphere $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}$ with $p >3$ a prime, we prove that the homotopy nilpotency satisfies $\mbox {nil}\ \mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}<\infty$, with respect to any homotopy associative $H$-structure on $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}$. We also prove that $\mbox {nil}\ \mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}= 1$ for all but a finite number of primes $p >3$. Then, for the loop space of the associated $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}$-projective space $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}P(n-1)$, with $m,n\ge 2$ and $m\mid p-1$, we derive that $\mbox {nil}\ \Omega (\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}P (n-1))\le 3$.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on Behalf of The Edinburgh Mathematical Society

Introduction

The homotopy nilpotency classes $\mbox {nil}\ X$ of associative $H$-spaces $X$ has been extensively studied, as well as their homotopy commutativity. In particular, Hopkins [Reference Hopkins10] made great progress by giving (co)homological criteria for homotopy associative finite $H$-spaces to be homotopy nilpotent. For example, he showed that if a homotopy associative finite $H$-space has no torsion in the integral homology, then it is homotopy nilpotent. Later, Rao [Reference Rao15, Reference Rao16] showed that the converse of the above criterion is true in the case of groups $Spin(m)$ and $SO(m)$ and a connected compact Lie group is homotopy nilpotent if and only if it has no torsion in homology. Eventually, Yagita [Reference Yagita21] proved that, when $G$ is a compact, simply-connected Lie group, its $p$-localization $G_{(p)}$ is homotopy nilpotent if and only if it has no torsion in the integral homology.

Although many results on the homotopy nilpotency have been obtained, the homotopy nilpotency classes have been determined in very few cases. It is well known that for the loop space $\Omega (\mathbb {S}^{m})$ of the $m$-sphere $\mathbb {S}^{m}$, we have $\mbox {nil}\ \Omega (\mathbb {S}^{m})=1$ if and only if $m=1,3,7$ and

\[ \mbox{nil}\ \Omega(\mathbb{S}^{m}) = \left\{\begin{array}{@{}ll} 2 & \mbox{for odd}\; m\; \mbox{and}\;m\not=1,3,7 \;\mbox{or}\, m=2;\\ 3 &\mbox{for even} \;m\ge 4. \end{array}\right. \]

Next, write $\mathbb {K}P^{m}$ for the projective $m$-space for $\mathbb {K}=\mathbb {R},\,\mathbb {C}$, the field of reals or complex numbers and $\mathbb {H}$, the skew $\mathbb {R}$-algebra of quaternions. Then, the homotopy nilpotency of $\Omega (\mathbb {K}P^{m})$ has been first studied by Ganea [Reference Ganea7], Snaith [Reference Snaith17] and then their $p$-localization $\Omega ((\mathbb {K}P^{m})_{(p)})$ by Meier [Reference Meier12]. The homotopy nilpotency of the loop spaces of Grassmann and Stiefel manifolds and their $p$-localization have been extensively studied in [Reference Golasiński8].

Now, let $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}$ be the $p$-localization of the sphere $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}$ at a prime $p$. The paper grew out of our desire to develop techniques in calculating the homotopy nilpotency classes of $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}$ with respect to any homotopy associative $H$-structure for $p>3$. Its main result is the explicit determination of the homotopy nilpotence class of a wide range of homotopy associative multiplications on localized spheres $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}$.

We begin with general results useful in the rest of the paper. In particular, we make use of [Reference Hopkins10, Theorem 2.1] to conclude the following corollary.

Corollary 1.4 Let $X$ be a finite simply-connected $CW$-complex with torsion-free homology $H_\ast (X,\mathbb {Z})$. If the $p$-localization $X_{(p)}$ for a prime $p$ admits a homotopy associative $H$-structure then $\mbox {nil}\ X_{(p)}<\infty$.

Next, we consider the homotopy nilpotency of $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}$ with respect to any homotopy associative $H$-structures and the loop space $\Omega (\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}P(n-1))$ of the associated $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}$-projective space $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}P(n-1)$ for $p> 3$. First, we make use of Corollary 1.4, to prove the homotopy nilpotency of $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}$.

Theorem 1.5 If $m\ge 2$ and $p>3$ is a prime then

\[ \mbox{nil}\ \mathbb{S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}<\infty \]

with respect to any homotopy associative $H$-structure on $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}$.

Furthermore, we show that $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}$ is homotopy associative and commutative for all but a finite number of primes $p$.

Then, we apply Zabrodsky's result [Reference Zabrodsky22, Lemma 2.6.6] to show the homotopy nilpotency of $\Omega (\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}P(n-1))$ under some conditions.

Theorem 3.12 Let $m\ge 2$ and $p> 3$ be a prime.

  1. (1) If $n\ge 2$ and $m\mid p-1$ then

    \[ \mbox{nil}\ \Omega (\mathbb{S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}P(n-1))\le \mbox{nil}\ \mathbb{S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}+1\le 3; \]
  2. (2) if $j=s= 1$ and $m \nmid p-1$, or if we have $s\ge 1$, $j\le p$, $j$ odd, and $m \mid p-1$, then

    \[ \mbox{nil}\ \Omega(\mathbb{S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}P(jp^{s}-1))=1. \]

1. Prerequisites

All spaces and maps in this note are assumed to be connected, based and of the homotopy type of $CW$-complexes. We also do not distinguish notationally between a continuous map and its homotopy class. We write $\Omega (X)$ (respectively $E(X)$) for the loop (respectively suspension) space on a space $X$, $\simeq$ for the homotopy relation and $[Y,X]$ for the set of homotopy classes of maps $Y\to X$.

Given a space $X$, we use the customary notation $X\vee X$ and $X\wedge X$ for the wedge and the smash product of $X$, respectively.

Recall that an $H$-space is a pair $(X,\mu )$, where $X$ is a space and $\mu : X \times X \to X$ is a map such that the diagram

commutes up to homotopy, where $\nabla : X\vee X\to X$ is the codiagonal map.

We call $\mu$ a multiplication or an $H$-structure on $X$. Two examples of $H$-spaces come in mind: topological groups and the spaces $\Omega (X)$ of loops on $X$. In the sequel, we identify an $H$-space $(X,\mu )$ with the space $X$.

An $H$-space $X$ is called a group-like space if $X$ satisfies all the axioms of groups up to homotopy. Recall that a homotopy associative an $H$-space always has a homotopy inverse. More precisely, according to [Reference Zabrodsky22, Corollary 1.3.2] (see also [Reference Arkowitz3, Proposition 8.4.4]), we have the following result.

Proposition 1.1 If $X$ is a homotopy associative $H$-space then $X$ is a group-like space.

If $X$ is a homotopy associative $H$-space, then the functor $[ -, X]$ takes its values in the category of groups. One may then ask when this functor takes its values in various subcategories of groups.

For example, $X$ is homotopy commutative if and only if $[Y, X]$ is abelian for all $Y$.

For an integer $n\ge 1$, let $X^{\times n}$ and $X^{\wedge n}$ be the $n$-fold Cartesian and smash power of $X$, respectively. Write $q_{X,n} : X^{\times n}\to X^{\wedge n}$ for the quotient map. Given a group-like space $X$, we write $\gamma _{X,1}=\mbox {id}_X : X \to X$ and $\gamma _{X,2} : X \times X \to X$ for the commutator map of $X$. Since the restriction ${\gamma _{X,2}}_{\mid X\vee X}\simeq \ast$, we get a map $\bar {\gamma }_{X,2} : X \wedge X \to X$ with $\bar {\gamma }_{X,2}q_{X,2}\simeq \gamma _{X,2}$. Next, define inductively the maps

\[ \gamma_{X,n+1} : X^{{\times}(n+1)}\to X\quad \mbox{and}\quad \bar{\gamma}_{X,n+1} : X^{{\wedge}(n+1)}\to X \]

by $\gamma _{X,n+1}=\gamma _{X,2}\circ (\gamma _{X,1} \times \gamma _{X,n})$ and $\bar {\gamma }_{X,n+1}=\bar {\gamma }_{X,2}\circ (\gamma _{X,1} \wedge \bar {\gamma }_{X,n})$ for $n\ge 2$, respectively. Then, the diagram

commutes up to homotopy for $n\ge 2$.

One might ask if there is an upper bound for the nilpotency class of $[Y, X]$ that is independent of $Y$. The homotopy nilpotency class of $X$ defined by Berstein–Ganea [Reference Berstein and Ganea5] is the least $n$ such that $\gamma _{X,n+1}\simeq \ast$ and $\gamma _{X,n}\not \simeq \ast$. Equivalently, the homotopy nilpotency class of $X$ is the least $n$ such that $\bar {\gamma }_{X,n+1}\simeq \ast$ and $\bar {\gamma }_{X,n}\not \simeq \ast$. In this case, we write $\mbox {nil}\ X =n$ and call the homotopy associative $H$-space $X$ homotopy nilpotent. If no such integer exists, we put $\mbox {nil}\ X=\infty$.

Note that $\mbox {nil}\ X=1$ if and only if $X$ is homotopy commutative. Given a space $X$, the number $\mbox {nil}\ \Omega (X)$ (if any) is called the homotopy nilpotency class of $X$.

Now, let $MU$ be the complex Thom spectrum, $BP^{\ast }(-)$ the Brown–Peterson cohomology with coefficients $BP^{\ast } = \mathbb {Z}_{(p)}[v_1,\ldots ]$ and $K(n)$ the $n$th Morava $K$-theory at a prime $p$. Thus, $K(n)_\ast (pt) = \mathbb {Z}/p[v_n, v_n^{-1}]$ with $|v_n|=2p^{n}-2$. Hopkins [Reference Hopkins10] described a cohomological criteria for the homotopy nilpotence of finite connected associative $H$-spaces.

We recall Rao's formulation [Reference Rao15, Theorem 0.2] of Hopkins’ result [Reference Hopkins10, Theorem 2.1] needed in the sequel.

Theorem 1.2 Let $X$ be a finite homotopy associative $H$-space. Then the following conditions are equivalent:

  1. (1) $X$ is homotopy nilpotent;

  2. (2) $\widetilde {MU}^{\ast }(\bar {\gamma }_{X,n}) = 0$ for sufficiently large $n$;

  3. (3) for every prime $p$, $\widetilde {BP}^{\ast } (\bar {\gamma }_{X,n})= 0$ for sufficiently large $n$;

  4. (4) for every prime $p$ and positive integer m, $K(m)_\ast (\bar {\gamma }_{X,n})= 0$ for sufficiently large $n$.

Then, in [Reference Hopkins10, Corollary 2.2], it was deduced the following homological criterion for the homotopy nilpotency.

Corollary 1.3 If $X$ is a finite associative $H$-space and the integral homology $H_\ast (X,\mathbb {Z})$ is torsion free then $X$ is homotopy nilpotent.

Furthermore, we derive the following result the proof of which is essentially a small modification of Hopkins’ argument [Reference Hopkins10, Corollary 2.2].

Corollary 1.4 Let $X$ be a finite simply-connected $CW$-complex with torsion free homology $H_\ast (X,\mathbb {Z})$. If the $p$-localization $X_{(p)}$ for a prime $p$ admits a homotopy associative $H$-structure then $\mbox {nil}\ X_{(p)}<\infty$.

Proof. Note that $H\mathbb {Q}^{\ast }(\bar {\gamma }_n) = 0$ for the field of rationals $\mathbb {Q}$ sufficiently large $n$ since $X_{(p)}^{\wedge n}$ is at least $(n-1)$-connected. By assumption, the canonical map $MU^{\ast }(X_{(p)}^{\wedge n})\to MU^{\ast }(X_{(p)}^{\wedge n})\otimes \mathbb {Q}$ is injective, so by Theorem 1.2, it suffices to show that $MU^{\ast }(\bar {\gamma }_n)\otimes \mathbb {Q}=0$. But, for a finite $CW$-complex $X$, there is a natural isomorphism

\begin{align*} MU^{{\ast}}(X^{{\wedge} n}_{(p)})\otimes\mathbb{Q}&\approx MU^{{\ast}}(X^{{\wedge} n})\otimes\mathbb{Q}\approx MU^{{\ast}}(\mbox{pt})\otimes H\mathbb{Q}^{{\ast}}(X^{{\wedge} n})\\ &\approx MU^{{\ast}}(\mbox{pt})\otimes H\mathbb{Q}^{{\ast}}(X^{{\wedge} n}_{(p)}), \end{align*}

so the map $MU^{\ast }(\bar {\gamma }_n)\otimes \mathbb {Q}= 0$ as soon as $H\mathbb {Q}^{\ast }(\bar {\gamma }_n)=0$. This completes the proof.

Since the homology $H_\ast (\mathbb {S}^{2m-1},\mathbb {Z})$ are torsion free and $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}$ is a finite $CW$-complex, Corollary 1.4 yields the result on the homotopy nilpotency of $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}$.

Theorem 1.5 If $m\ge 2$ and $p>3$ is a prime then

\[ \mbox{nil}\ \mathbb{S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}<\infty \]

with respect to any homotopy associative $H$-structure on $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}$.

In the sequel, we make use of the following. Let $f: X\to Y$ be an $H$-map of homotopy associative $H$-spaces. Recall from [Reference Zabrodsky22, Chapter II] that:

  1. (1) it is said $\mbox {nil}\ f \le n$ if $f\bar {\gamma }_{X,n}\simeq \ast$;

  2. (2) $f$ is called central if $\bar {\gamma }_{Y,2}(f \wedge \mbox {id}_Y)\simeq \ast$.

Notice that $\mbox {nil}\ f\le \min \{\mbox {nil}\ X,\mbox {nil}\ Y\}$.

Then, in view of [Reference Zabrodsky22, Lemma 2.6.6], we have the following techniques for the study of the homotopy nilpotency.

Proposition 1.6 Let $F\stackrel {i}{\to } E\stackrel {q}{\to } B$ be an $H$-fibration, i.e., $F\stackrel {i}{\to }E\stackrel {q}{\to }B$ is a fibration, $F,E$ and $B$ are $H$-spaces and the maps $i : F\to E$, and $q : E\to B$ are $H$-maps.

  1. (1) If $\mbox {nil}\ q \le n$ and $i : F\to E$ is central then $\mbox {nil}\ E \le n+1$;

  2. (2) if $\Omega (Y)\stackrel {i}{\to } E\stackrel {q}{\to } X$ is the induced $H$-fibration by an $H$-map $f : X\to Y$ then the map $i : \Omega (Y)\to E$ is central.

2. $A_m$-spaces

Recall that by Stasheff [Reference Stasheff18], an $A_m$-structure on a space $X$ consists on $m$-tuples

such that ${\frak q}_{n\ast } : \pi _k(\mathcal{E}_n(X),X)\to \pi _k(\mathcal {B}_n({X}))$ is an isomorphism for all $k\ge 1$, together with a contracting homotopy $h: C\mathcal {E}_{n-1}(X)\to \mathcal {E}_n(X)$ such that $h(C\mathcal {E}_{n-1}(X))\subseteq \mathcal {E}_n(X)$ for $n=2,\ldots ,m$. For the purposes of homotopy theory, in the light of [Reference Stasheff18, Proposition 2], we can think of $X\to \mathcal {E}_n(X)\stackrel {\frak {q}_n}{\to }\mathcal {B}_n(X)$, as a fibration.

An $A_m$-space for $m=0,1\ldots ,\infty$ is a space $X$ with a multiplication $\mu : X\times X\to X$ that is associative up to higher homotopies involving up to $n$ variables. Further, an $A_\infty$-space has all coherent higher associativity homotopies and is equivalent to a loop space $\Omega (Y)$ for a space $Y$ called the classifying space of $X$.

By [Reference Stasheff18, Theorem 5], classes of spaces with $A_m$-structures and $A_m$-spaces coincide.

Proposition 2.1 A space $X$ admits an $A_m$-structure if and only if $X$ is an $A_m$-space.

The $X$-projective $n$-space $XP(n)$ for $n\le m$, associated with an $A_m$-space X is the base space $\mathcal {B}_{n+1}(X)$ of the derived $A_m$-structure. The space $\mathcal {B}_1(X)$ is a point and $\mathcal {B}_2(X)$ can be recognized as the suspension $E(X)$. Notice that $\mathcal {B}_{m+1}(X)$ can be defined even when $\frak {p}_{m+1}$ cannot; it has the homotopy type of the mapping cone $C\mathcal {E}_m(X)\cup _{\frak {q}_m} \mathcal {B}_m(X)$. By means of [Reference Stasheff18, Theorem 11, Theorem 12], the spaces $\mathcal {E}_n(X)$ and $\mathcal {B}_{n+1}(X)$ have the homotopy types of the $n$th join $X^{\ast ^{n}}$ and $C\mathcal {E}_n(X)\cup _{\frak {p}_n} \mathcal {B}_n(X)$ for $n\le m$, respectively provided $X$ is path-connected. Because of a homotopy equivalence $X^{\ast ^{n}}\simeq E^{n-1}(X^{\wedge n})$ for the $(n-1)$th suspension $E^{n-1}$, we deduce that the fibration $X\to \mathcal {E}_n(X)\stackrel {\frak {q}_n}{\to }\mathcal {B}_n(X)$ is homotopy equivalent to

(2.2)\begin{equation} X\to E^{n-1}X^{{\wedge} n}\stackrel{q_n}{\longrightarrow} XP(n-1). \end{equation}

3. Localized spheres $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}$ and $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}$-projective spaces $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}P(n-1)$

Let $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}$ be the $p$-localization of the sphere $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}$ at a prime $p$. It is known by [Reference James11, Theorem 1.4] that $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(2)}$ does not admit a homotopy associative multiplication if $m\not =1,2$. The sole obstruction to putting an $H$-structure on $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}$ is the Whitehead square $[\iota _{2m-1},\iota _{2m-1}]$ of a generator $\iota _{2m-1}\in \pi _{2m-1}(\mathbb {S}^{2m-1})$. Since the order of $[\iota _{2m-1},\iota _{2m-1}]$ is $\le 2$, it follows that, if $p$ is an odd prime, $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}$ admits an $H$-space structure. Which $p$-localized spheres $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}$ with $p>2$ have an $H$-structures or loop structures is known by Adams [Reference Adams1]. More precisely, in view of [Reference Adams2] (see also [Reference Neisendorfer14, Proposition 11.2.2]), we have the following $H$-structure on $\mathbb {S}_{(p)}^{2m-1}$.

Proposition 3.1 If $p$ is an odd prime and $n\ge 1$ then there is an $H$-structure $\mu _A$ on $\mathbb {S}_{(p)}^{2m-1}$ $($unique up to homotopy if $p$ is an odd prime and $n\ge 2$ or if $n \ge 1$ and $p>3)$ such that the double suspension $E^{2} : \mathbb {S}_{(p)}^{2m-1}\to \Omega ^{2}\mathbb {S}_{(p)}^{2m+1}$ is an $H$-map.

Further:

  1. (1) if $p>2$ then $(\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)},\mu _A)$ is a homotopy commutative $H$-space;

  2. (2) if $p>3$ then $(\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)},\mu _A)$ is a homotopy associative $H$-space.

Loosely speaking, via the double suspension map $E^{2} : \mathbb {S}_{(p)}^{2m-1}\to \Omega ^{2}(\mathbb {S}_{(p)}^{2m+1})$, the multiplication on the double loop space $\Omega ^{2}\mathbb {S}_{(p)}^{2m+1}$ restricts to the multiplication $\mu _A$ on the bottom cell $\mathbb {S}_{(p)}^{2m-1}$. Next, by Mimura et al. [Reference Mimura, Nishida and Toda13, Proposition 6.8], Stasheff [Reference Stasheff18] and Sullivan [Reference Sullivan19], we have the result on $H$-structures on $\mathbb {S}_{(p)}^{2m-1}$.

Proposition 3.2 Let $m\ge 2$ and $p>3$ be a prime. Then:

  1. (1) the $p$-localized sphere $\mathbb {S}_{(p)}^{2m-1}$ admits an $A_{p-1}$-structure;

  2. (2) if $\mathbb {S}_{(p)}^{2m-1}$ admits an $A_{p}$-structure then $m\mid p-1$;

  3. (3) $\mathbb {S}_{(p)}^{2m-1}$ admits an $A_\infty$-structure if and only if $m\mid p-1$ provided $p>3$.

This implies that $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}$ does not admit an $A_{p}$-structure provided $m\nmid p-1$. We also point out that an $A_{p-1}$-structure on $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}$ is induced from $\Omega ^{2}(\mathbb {S}_{(p)}^{2m+1})$ which is of course an $A_\infty$-space, via the double suspension map $E^{2} : \mathbb {S}_{(p)}^{2m-1}\to \Omega ^{2}(\mathbb {S}_{(p)}^{2m+1})$. Further, in view of Proposition 3.2, the sphere $\mathbb {S}_{(p)}^{2m-1}$ admits an $A_{p}$-structure if and only if it admits a classifying space.

Now, we show the nilpotency of $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}$ provided $m\mid p-1$.

Proposition 3.3 If $m\mid p-1$ then $\mbox {nil}\ \mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}\le 2$ with respect to the $A_\infty$-structure on $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}$.

Proof. Sullivan [Reference Sullivan19], to construct a classifying space for $\mathbb {S}_{(p)}^{2m-1}$ with $m\mid p-1$, considered the space $K(\mathbb {Z}_p, 2)$, where $\hat {\mathbb {Z}}_p$ is the $p$-adic integers and the cyclic subgroup $\Gamma <\mathbb {Z}_{p-1}<\hat {\mathbb {Z}}_p^{\ast }$ (the $p$-adic units) of order $m$. Then $\Gamma$ acts freely on a model of $K(\hat {\mathbb {Z}}_p,2)$ and $X = K(\hat {\mathbb {Z}}_p,2)/\Gamma$ has cohomology $H^{\ast }(X,\mathbb {Z}/p\mathbb {Z}) = S(x,2m)$, the graded symmetric algebra generated by $x$ with degree $|x|=2m$ and $\pi _1(X) = \Gamma$. After completing $X$ at $p$ to $\hat {X}_p$, we have a space with $\pi _1(\hat {X}_p) = 0$ and $H^{\ast }(\hat {X}_p, \mathbb {Z}/p\mathbb {Z}) = S(x,2m)$. The map $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}\to \Omega (\hat {X}_p)$ defines a homotopy equivalence $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}\stackrel {\simeq }{\to } \Omega (\hat {X}_p)$ and $\hat {X}_p$ is a classifying space for $\mathbb {S}_{(p)}^{2m-1}$.

But, by [Reference Neisendorfer14, Chapter 2], the $p$-completion preserves a fibration of simply-connected spaces. Hence, the $p$-completion of the fibration $\Gamma \to K(\hat {\mathbb {Z}}_p,2)\to X$ leads to the fibration $\hat {\Gamma }_p\to K(\hat {\mathbb {Z}}_p,2)\to \hat {X}_p$. Consequently, we get the $H$-fibration

\[ \Omega( K(\hat{\mathbb{Z}}_p,2))= K(\hat{\mathbb{Z}}_p,1)\longrightarrow \Omega(X)\longrightarrow \Gamma. \]

Since the space $X = K(\hat {\mathbb {Z}}_p,2)/\Gamma$ is simply-connected, we have $\widehat {(\Omega (X))}_p=\Omega (\hat {X}_p)$. Then, by means of the $p$-completeness of $K(\hat {\mathbb {Z}}_p,1)$, the $p$-completion of the fibration above yields the $H$-fibration

\[ K(\hat{\mathbb{Z}}_p,1)\longrightarrow \Omega(\hat{X}_p)\longrightarrow \hat{\Gamma}_p \]

determined by the canonical $H$-map $\hat {\Gamma }_p\to K(\hat {\mathbb {Z}}_p,2)$.

Thus, by means of Proposition 1.6(2), we derive that the $H$-map $\Omega ( K(\hat {\mathbb {Z}}_p,2))= K(\hat {\mathbb {Z}}_p,1)\to \Omega (X)$ is central and so Proposition 1.6(1) yields

\[ \mbox{nil}\ \mathbb{S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}\le 2. \]

This completes the proof.

Then, Arkowitz, Ewing and Schiffman [Reference Arkowitz, Ewing and Schiffman4, Theorem 0.1] have proved the following result on $H$-structures on $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}$.

Theorem 3.4 Let $p$ be an odd prime and $n$ a positive integer with $m\mid p-1$.

  1. (1) If $m< p-1$ then $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}$ has a unique $H$-structure which is both homotopy commutative and a loop multiplication.

  2. (2) If $m=p-1$ then $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}$ has precisely $p$ multiplications; one homotopy commutative and not a loop multiplication, and $(p-1)$ loop $H$-structures which are $H$-equivalent but not homotopy commutative.

Thus, the above and Theorem 3.4(2) yield the conclusion.

Corollary 3.5 If $m\mid p-1$ and $p>3$ then

\[ \mbox{nil}\ \mathbb{S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}= 2 \]

with respect to all $(p-1)$ loop $H$-structures on $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}$.

We point out that Proposition 3.3 has been already shown by Meier [Reference Meier12] in the special case when $m = p-1$ using the result [Reference Toda20, Theorem 13.4].

Theorem 3.6 Let $p$ be an odd prime.

\[ \pi_{2m-1+k}(\mathbb{S}^{2m-1)}_{(p)}) \approx\begin{cases} \mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z}\ \text{for}\ k = 2i(p-1)-1,\quad i = 1,\ldots, p-1,\ m\ge 2;\\ \mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z}\ \text{for}\ k = 2i(p-1)-2,\quad i=m,\ldots,p-1;\\ 0\ \text{ortherwise}\ \text{for}\ 1\le k< 2p(p-1)-2. \end{cases} \]

Given a pointed connected topological space $X$ and a prime $p$, write $\pi _m(X;p)$ for the $p$-primary component of its $m$th homotopy group $\pi _m(X)$ for $m\ge 1$. Recall that by [Reference Copeland6], the set of homotopy classes of possible $H$-structures on $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}$ is in one-to-one correspondence with $[\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}\wedge \mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)},\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}]=\pi _{4m-2}(\mathbb {S}^{2m-1},p)$. Consequently, if $p>3$ then we may study the homotopy nilpotency of $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}$.

Nevertheless, in some particular cases, an estimation for $\mbox {nil}\ \mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}$ might be stated. First, notice that Theorem 3.6 implies that

(3.7)\begin{equation} \pi_{2m-1+k}(\mathbb{S}^{2m-1}_{(p)})=0 \end{equation}

provided $k<2p(p-1)-2$, $k\not =2i(p-1)-1$ for $i = 1,\ldots , p-1$ and $k\not =2i(p-1)-2$ for $i = m,\ldots , p-1$.

Certainly, the homotopy group $\pi _{4m-2}(\mathbb {S}^{2m-1})$ is finite and write $\sharp \pi _{4m-2}(\mathbb {S}^{2m-1})$ for its order. Then, for $p_m=\max \{p;\, p \,\mbox {is a prime with}\ p\mid \sharp \pi _{4m-2}(\mathbb {S}^{2m-1})\}$, we apply Theorem 3.6 to state the result on an $H$-structure on $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}$.

Proposition 3.8 Let $p>3$ and $m\ge 3$.

If $m< p-1$ or $p>\max \{3,p_m\}$ then $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}$ admits a unique homotopy associative and commutative $H$-structure and $\mbox {nil}\ \mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}=1$.

Proof. If $m< p-1$ then $2m-1<2p-3$ and Equation (3.7) implies that

\[ [(\mathbb{S}^{2m-1}_{(p)})^{{\wedge} 2},\mathbb{S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}]=\pi_{2(2m-1)}(\mathbb{S}^{2m-1}_{(p)})=0. \]

If $p>\max \{3,p_m\}$ then $\pi _{2(2m-1)}(\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)})=0$ as well. Then, Proposition 3.1 provides an existence of a unique homotopy associative and commutative $H$-structure on $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}$ and the proof follows.

Now, we apply the results above to $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}$-projective spaces $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}P(n-1)$. Write $J_k(\mathbb {S}^{2n})$ for the $k$th stage of the James construction on the sphere $\mathbb {S}^{2m}$.

Since $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}P(1)\simeq \mathbb {S}^{2m}_{(p)}$ and $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}P(n-1)\simeq C\mathbb {S}^{2(n-1)m-1}_{(p)} \cup _{q_{n-1}}\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}P(n-2)$ for the fibration (2.2)

\[ q_{n-1} : \mathbb{S}^{2(n-1)m-1}_{(p)}\to \mathbb{S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}P(n-2) \]

with $X=\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}$, we can define inductively a map

\[ \mathbb{S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}P(n-1)\longrightarrow J_{n-1}(\mathbb{S}^{2m}_{(p)}). \]

for $p>3$ provided $n-1< p$ with $m\nmid p-1$ or any $n\ge 1$ with $m\mid p-1$.

Furthermore, one can state the result on some $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}P(n-1)$.

Proposition 3.9 The canonical map

\[ \mathbb{S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}P(n-1)\longrightarrow J_{n-1}(\mathbb{S}^{2m}_{(p)}) \]

is an integral homology isomorphism for $p>3$ provided $n-1< p$ with $m\nmid p-1$ or any $n\ge 1$ with $m\mid p-1$.

Consequently, by means of the Whitehead Theorem, we get a homotopy equivalence $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}P(n-1)\stackrel {\simeq }{\longrightarrow }J_{n-1}(\mathbb {S}^{2m}_{(p)})$ which yields an $H$-homotopy equivalence

\[ \Omega(\mathbb{S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}P(n-1))\stackrel{\simeq}{\longrightarrow}\Omega(J_{n-1}(\mathbb{S}^{2m}_{(p)})) \]

for $p>3$ provided $n-1< p$ with $m\nmid p-1$ or any $n\ge 1$ with $m\mid p-1$. But, Gray showed [Reference Gray9, Theorem 1 and the footnote on p. 182] that $\Omega (J_{jp^{s}-1}(\mathbb {S}^{2m}))$ with $p\ge 3$ is universal in the category of homotopy associative commutative $H$-spaces, with its generating subspace being the $(2mp-2)$-skeleton provided $p\ge 3$ with $s>0$ and an odd $j\le p$. Hence, Proposition 3.9 yields the conclusion on the $H$-structure on $\Omega (\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}P(jp^{s}-1))$.

Corollary 3.10 If $p>3$ and $m\ge 2$ then the associative $H$-space $\Omega (\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}P(jp^{s}-1))$ is homotopy commutative provided $j=s=1$ and $m\nmid p-1$ or $s\ge 1$, $j\le p$ is odd and $m\mid p-1$.

For further studies of the homotopy nilpotency of $\Omega (\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}P(n-1))$, we need to show an existence of some $H$-fibration.

Lemma 3.11 If $p> 3$ is a prime, $m\ge 2$ and $m\mid p-1$ then for a fixed $A_\infty$-structure on $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}$ and $n\ge 2$ then there is an $H$-fibration

\[ \Omega (\mathbb{S}^{2mn-1}_{(p)})\longrightarrow \Omega (\mathbb{S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}P(n-1))\longrightarrow\mathbb{S}^{2m-1}_{(p)} \]

with the central map $\Omega (\mathbb {S}^{2mn-1}_{(p)})\longrightarrow \Omega (\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}P(n-1))$.

Proof. Recall that by Proposition 3.2(3) the space $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}$ admits an $A_\infty$-structure provided $m\mid p-1$. Furthermore, for such the space $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}$, Sullivan [Reference Sullivan19] constructed a classifying space denoted in the proof of Proposition 3.3 by $\hat {X}_p$.

Next, write $i_n : \mathbb {S}^{2mn-1}_{(p)}\hookrightarrow \mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}P(n-1)$ and $j_n : \mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}P(n-1)\hookrightarrow \hat {X}_p$ for the canonical inclusion maps and notice that $E^{n-1}(\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)})^{\wedge n}=\mathbb {S}^{2mn-1}_{(p)}$. Since $\Omega (\hat {X}_p)\simeq \mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}$, we get the Puppe fibration sequence

\[ \cdots\to \Omega(\mathbb{S}^{2mn-1}_{(p)})\stackrel{\Omega(i_n)}{\longrightarrow}\Omega(\mathbb{S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}P(n-1)) \stackrel{\Omega(j_n)}{\longrightarrow}\mathbb{S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}\stackrel{\partial_n}{\to} \mathbb{S}^{2mn-1}_{(p)}\stackrel{i_n}{\hookrightarrow}\mathbb{S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}P(n-1)\stackrel{j_n}{\hookrightarrow}\hat{X}_p. \]

But, the $H$-deviation [Reference Zabrodsky22, Definition 1.4.1.] of $\partial _n$ is a map $\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}\wedge \mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}\to \mathbb {S}^{2mn-1}_{(p)}$ which is null homotopic for dimension and connectivity reasons if $n\ge 2$. Then, by Zabrodsky [Reference Zabrodsky22, Proposition 1.5.1.], $\partial _n$ is an $H$-map. Hence, Proposition 1.6(2) implies that $\Omega (i_n) : \Omega (\mathbb {S}^{2mn-1}_{(p)})\to \Omega (\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}P(n-1))$ is central in the $H$-fibration

\[ \Omega(\mathbb{S}^{2mn-1}_{(p)})\stackrel{\Omega(i_n)}{\longrightarrow}\Omega(\mathbb{S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}P(n-1)) \stackrel{\Omega(j_n)}{\longrightarrow}\mathbb{S}^{2m-1}_{(p)} \]

and this completes the proof.

Thus, Propositions 1.6(1), 3.3, Corollary 3.10 and Lemma 3.11 yield the result on the homotopy nilpotency of $\Omega (\mathbb {S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}P(n-1))$ under some conditions.

Theorem 3.12 Let $m\ge 2$ and $p> 3$ be a prime.

  1. (1) If $n\ge 2$ and $m\mid p-1$ then

    \[ \mbox{nil}\ \Omega (\mathbb{S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}P(n-1))\le \mbox{nil}\ \mathbb{S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}+1\le 3; \]
  2. (2) if $j=s= 1$ and $m \nmid p-1$, or if we have $s\ge 1$, $j\le p$, $j$ odd, and $m \mid p-1$, then

    \[ \mbox{nil}\ \Omega(\mathbb{S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}P(jp^{s}-1))=1. \]

To conclude, we point out that Theorem 3.12 applies to more cases than Meier's result [Reference Meier12, Theorem 5.4].

We close the paper with the following conjecture.

Conjecture 3.13 If $p> 3$ is a prime and $m,n\ge 2$ then

\[ \mbox{nil}\ \Omega (\mathbb{S}^{2m-1}_{(p)}P(n-1))<\infty. \]

Acknowledgements

The author greatly appreciates the anonymous referee for a careful reading of the manuscript last version and his/her many insightful comments and suggestions. Even deeper debts are owed to him/her for suggesting Proposition 3.9, the proof of Lemma 3.11 and indicating paper [Reference Gray9].

References

Adams, J. F., On the nonexistence of elements of Hopf invariant one, Ann. of Math. (2) 72 (1960), 20104.10.2307/1970147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, J. F., The sphere, considered as an $H$-space $p$, Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. (2) 12 (1961), 5260.10.1093/qmath/12.1.52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arkowitz, M., Introduction to homotopy theory (Universitext, Springer, New York, 2011).10.1007/978-1-4419-7329-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arkowitz, M., Ewing, J. and Schiffman, S., $H$-structures on localized and completed spheres, Quart. J. Math. Oxford (2) 26 (1975), 295307.10.1093/qmath/26.1.295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berstein, I. and Ganea, T., Homotopical nilpotency, Illinois J. Math. 5 (1961), 991030.10.1215/ijm/1255629648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copeland, A. H. Jr., Binary operations on sets of mapping classes, Michigan Math. J. 6 (1959), 723.10.1307/mmj/1028998133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganea, T., On the Loop Spaces of Projective Spaces, J. Math. Mech. 16 (1967), 853858.Google Scholar
Golasiński, M., Homotopy nilpotency of some homogenous spaces, Manuscripta Math. (2021), https://doi.org/10.1007/s00229-021-01273-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, B., Homotopy commutativity and the $EHP$ sequence, Contemp. Math. 96 (1989), 181188.10.1090/conm/096/1022680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, M., Nilpotence and finite $H$-spaces, Israel J. Math. 66 (1989), 238246.10.1007/BF02765895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, I. M., Multiplication on spheres. II, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 84 (1957), 545558.Google Scholar
Meier, W., Homotopy Nilpotence and Localization, Math. Z. 161 (1978), 169183.10.1007/BF01214929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mimura, M., Nishida, G. and Toda, H., Localization of $CW$-complexes and its applications, J. Math. Soc. Japan 23(4) (1971), 593624.10.2969/jmsj/02340593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neisendorfer, J., Algebraic methods in unstable homotopy theory (Cambridge University Press, 2010).10.1017/CBO9780511691638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, V. K., $Spin(n)$ is not homotopy nilpotent for $n\ge 7$, Topology 32 (1993), 239249.10.1016/0040-9383(93)90017-PCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, V. K., Homotopy nilpotent Lie groups have no torsion in homology, Manuscripta Math. 92 (1997), 455462.10.1007/BF02678205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snaith, V. P., Some nilpotent $H$-spaces, Osaka J. Math. 13 (1976), 145156.Google Scholar
Stasheff, J. D., Homotopy associativity of $H$-spaces, I, II, Trans. Am. Soc. 108 (1963), 275312.Google Scholar
Sullivan, D., Genetics of homotopy theory and the Adams conjecture, Ann. Math., Second Ser. 100(1) (1974), 179.10.2307/1970841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toda, H., Composition methods in homotopy groups of spheres, Annals of Mathematics Studies, Volume 49 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1962).Google Scholar
Yagita, N., Homotopy nilpotency for simply connected Lie groups, Bull. London Math. Soc. 25 (1993), 481486.10.1112/blms/25.5.481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zabrodsky, A., Hopf spaces (North-Holland Publishing Company, 1976).Google Scholar