Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:30:46.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pre-breeding highlights of intraspecific polymorphism and genetic estimates of seed traits of African yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa Hochst Ex. A. Rich.) Harms breeding lines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2024

Daniel B. Adewale*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science and Horticulture, Federal University Oye-Ekiti, Ikole-Ekiti Campus, Nigeria
Rachael M. Ibiloye
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science and Horticulture, Federal University Oye-Ekiti, Ikole-Ekiti Campus, Nigeria
Adefunke A. Odetoye
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science and Horticulture, Federal University Oye-Ekiti, Ikole-Ekiti Campus, Nigeria
Marvelous U. Paul
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science and Horticulture, Federal University Oye-Ekiti, Ikole-Ekiti Campus, Nigeria
Grace A. Ojo
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science and Horticulture, Federal University Oye-Ekiti, Ikole-Ekiti Campus, Nigeria
Emmanuel B. Ogundare
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science and Horticulture, Federal University Oye-Ekiti, Ikole-Ekiti Campus, Nigeria
Abosede O. Fasaanu
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science and Horticulture, Federal University Oye-Ekiti, Ikole-Ekiti Campus, Nigeria
Esther O. Aribilola
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science and Horticulture, Federal University Oye-Ekiti, Ikole-Ekiti Campus, Nigeria
*
Corresponding author: Daniel B. Adewale; Email: daniel.adewale@fuoye.edu.ng
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Discriminatory morpho-metric features are obvious on legume seeds. This study utilized seven quantitative and 11 qualitative seed traits to characterize 139 African yam bean (AYB) breeding lines which were developed through single seed descent procedure. The seven quantitative data were subjected to analysis of variance, their means were combined with qualitative scores for genetic distance, principal component (PC) and clustering analyses. Significant (P ≤ 0.001) variation existed among the breeding lines for the seven traits. Mean ranges of seed length (SL), width (SW), thickness (ST) and a single seed weight (SSW) among the 139 breeding lines were respectively: 6.77–10.22 mm, 5.70–7.86 mm, 4.96–7.45 mm and 0.15–0.42 g. Positive and significant (P ≤ 0.05) genotypic correlation existed among SSW, SL, SW and ST. Seed colours, pattern, shapes, sizes, surface texture, brilliance varied among the breeding lines. Ranges of phenotypic and genotypic coefficient of variation and broadsense heritability were: 5.49–23.84%, 2.95–19.88% and 28.91–69.54% respectively. Fourteen (quantitative and qualitative) traits contributed higher (≥ 0.30) eigenvector loadings to the first three PC axes which explained 57.9% of the total variation among the breeding lines. Similarity among the lines was 0.75. Four clusters ensued in the dendrograph and each group had genetic similarities of: 0.85 (I), 0.82 (II), 0.78 (III) and 0.80 (IV). This research unveiled significant variation among AYB breeding lines with promising reliability for breeding opportunities of the qualitative and quantitative seed traits, which could contribute to higher grain yield and acceptability.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of National Institute of Agricultural Botany

Introduction

Food, feed and nutrition security is only attainable by increase production of different crop types at optimal quality and quantity. However, legumes pulses are ahead of other plants part as the major source of dietary protein (Balan and Predeep, Reference Balan and Predeep2021). The present study is part of the move to promote acceptability of less known crops, especially legumes in human and livestock meals because they differ in profile, digestibility, bioavailability, consumers' acceptability etc. (Henchion et al., Reference Henchion, Hayes, Mullen, Fenelon and Tiwari2017). African yam bean (AYB) (Sphenostylis stenocarpa Hochst A. Rich.) Harms, a tuberous legume evidentially hosts lots of food and nutritional values in the seed and the tuber for human and livestock. Its significance among major legumes and tuberous crop is very poor and its global production statistics is unknown till date, however, Nigeria obviously leads in research attention, cultivation and production (Adewale and Nnamani, Reference Adewale and Nnamani2022; Adewale, Reference Adewale, Farooq and Siddique2023).

Genetic resources for most previous AYB characterization had been mostly accessions and sometimes landraces. Accessions and landraces are ‘raw’ plant genetic resources with unknown genetic profile but are usually the basic stocks for the development of breeding lines. Accessions are recovered genetic resources from domesticated and explored landraces; they hold significant characteristics which are discovered during characterization and evaluation programmes. While accessions and landraces have not been selected, breeding lines have undergone some cycles of breeding/selection. Genetic resources for the present study are breeding lines. Moreover, phenotypic profiling of breeding lines leads to identification of individuals with potential to provide platform for selection of genotypes for cultivar development programmes. Breeding lines have traceable link to landrace(s) or accession(s), however, with some peculiar characteristic needing to be assayed and explored.

Pre-breeding profiling or characterization (genotypic or phenotypic) describes, classifies and unveils genetic resources potentials within a genepool for guided trait-based selection. The same process equally identifies superior genotype(s) as possible parents for subsequent hybridization, linking superiority to specific trait(s), and direct listing and recommendation of genetic materials for advancement. Genetic estimates of quantitative traits provide a predictive measure of the responses of traits to genetic improvement. According to Mulualem and Michael (Reference Mulualem and Michael2013) higher values for most genetic estimates suggests the occurrence of additive gene action with low environmental influence on the trait.

It is expected that germplasm collectors and the primary user of genetic resources must be thoroughly versed and familiar with intra-specific variation of their target taxa (Hanelt and Hammer, Reference Hanelt, Hammer, Guarino, Ramanatha and Goldberg2011). The present investigation therefore employed seed characteristics of the developed 139 breeding lines of AYB diversity assessment. Seed is central to human and livestock livelihood on earth (N'Danikou et al., Reference N'Danikou, Shango and Sigalla2022), seed characteristics of legumes reveal significant intra-specific variabilities (Moles et al., Reference Moles, Ackerly, Webb, Tweddle, Dickie and Westoby2005; Bareke, Reference Bareke2019), most of which are highly heritable (Blair et al., Reference Blair, Gonza, Kimani and Butare2010). Seed traits therefore are very important for phenotypic diversity assessment, providing reliable leverages for genetic improvement and presenting reliable determinants for commercial acceptability of varieties (Adewale et al., Reference Adewale, Okonji, Oyekanmi, Akintobi and Aremu2010; Rana et al., Reference Rana, Sharma, Tyagi, Chahota, Gautam, Singh, Sharma and Ojha2015). The present study employed diversity assessment among 139 AYB breeding lines using some phenotypic traits whose genetic estimates were equally discovered to reliably guide direct or indirect selection of genotypes for subsequent cultivar improvement programme for the crop.

Materials and methods

Source of basal genetic materials for the experiment

In 2019, seeds of 30 AYB accessions were collected from the Genetic Resources Centre (GRC), International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan Nigeria. Some quantities of seed were purchased from Pagede village, Owo, Ondo state, Nigeria same year and seven landraces were sorted from the seed mixtures, using size, colour and colour patterns as descriptors.

Experimental layout and breeding system

The 37 genetic materials were grown out in row plots of five plants in three replicates at the Teaching and Research farms, Federal University Oye-Ekiti, Ikole-Ekiti Campus, Nigeria. The single seed descent breeding method was employed. Each plant within a row was isolated by bagging with a fine mesh plastic net. This was done according to selfing technique for AYB previously reported by Adewale and Adegbite (Reference Adewale and Adegbite2018). At harvest of the isolated plants, 59 genetic resources (S1) emerged based on testa colours and colour patterns. In 2021, five uniform seeds, each of 51 S1 were sown in a single row of unreplicated trial. One plant in each row plot was isolated. Harvest from the isolated 51 S1 plant gave rise to 72 different S2 seed lots which were planted out in 2022 for further selfing to generate S3 progenies. Only 16 variants (with significant features) different from lines in S1 and S2 were recorded for S3. From the three cycles of selffing plants from single seeds, (i.e. S1 (51), S2 (72) and S3 (16)), a total of 139 genetic materials or breeding lines were considered for this study.

Data collection and analysis

Four quantitative data (individual seed weight, seed length, width and thickness) were generated from 10 random seed samples in the seed lots. Furthermore, three ratios between seed length, width and thickness were estimated and 11 qualitative data were also recorded.

Individual seed weight, seed length, width and thickness were assessed for normal distribution. To assess the reliability of the measured traits for quantitative description, means of seed length, width, thickness and their ratios were all compared in pairs using paired t-test statistics. For the seven traits, minimum and the maximum data were utilized to generate the coefficient of range (CoR) as:

(1)$$\displaystyle{{{\rm Largest\;value}-{\rm Smallest\;value}} \over {{\rm Largest\;value} + {\rm Smallest\;value}}}$$

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted as completely randomized design for the seven quantitative data, using PROC GLM and the treatment means (genotypes) were separated using Tukey honestly significant differences in SAS (version 9.4, 2011). The relationship among the seven quantitative traits was verified using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Phenotypic, genotypic coefficient of variations and broadsense heritability were estimated from variance components according to Singh and Chaudhury (Reference Singh and Chaudhury1985). From the variance components in the ANCOVA, phenotypic and genotypic correlation coefficients were estimated following Miller et al. (Reference Miller, Williams, Robinson and Comstock1958) and their respective significance were tested following Singh and Chaudhury (Reference Singh and Chaudhury1985) to generate the calculated r-values. The significance of each correlation coefficients was detected by the comparison of the calculated with the tabulated r-values at g-2 degrees of freedom, where g is the number of genotypes. Coheritability was estimated as: (GCOVX1X2/PCOVX1X2) following Sahu (Reference Sahu2013) and Farshadfar and Estehghari (Reference Farshadfar and Estehghari2014); where: GCOVX1X2 and PCOVX1X2 were the respective genotypic and phenotypic covariances for paired traits. Mean of the seven quantitative traits and the descriptive scores for the 11 qualitative traits for each genotype were prepared as 139 × 18 mean matrix table for multivariate analysis. From the data matrix, genetic distance, principal component (PC) and clustering analysis were carried out in SAS. Mean performances, similarity and variability among members within each cluster were equally estimated for the 18 phenotypic variables.

Results

From Fig. 1, the mean ranges of the different metric dimensions and individual seed weight of the 139 AYB breeding lines were: 6.77–10.22 mm (seed length), 5.70–7.86 mm (seed width), 4.96–7.45 mm (seed thickness) and 0.15–0.42 g (individual seed weight). ANOVA revealed significance (P ≤ 0.001) among the 139 AYB breeding lines for: individual seed weight, seed length, width, thickness and their ratios; furthermore, the coefficient of variation for the seven traits was less than 10% (Table 1). The length, width, thickness of AYB seeds and their ratios differed significantly (P ≤ 0.001) from each other (online Supplementary Table S1). From this study, mean individual seed weight, seed length, width and thickness of AYB were respectively: 0.28 g, 8.61, 6.69 and 6.23 mm. However, in some breeding lines, a single seed could weigh 0.42 g, be as long as 10.5 mm with possible width and thickness of: 7.88 and 7.57 mm (Table 1). CoR was highest (38.10%) in individual seed weight and least (12.25%) in width to thickness ratio. The seed width to thickness ratio had the least values for HB, PCV and GCV, but the highest values for the same occurred in seed length (Table 1). The highest and the least genetic advance respectively occurred in individual seed weight and width to thickness ratio (Table 1). Generally, by magnitude, PCV were higher than GCV. Six of the quantitative traits had ≥ 50% broad sense heritability, the seed length had the highest (Table 1). Table 2 presents the phenotypic and genotypic correlation coefficients among the seven quantitative traits. Among the 42 correlation coefficients, six were negative, five of which were phenotypic correlations. Only four were positively significant (P ≤ 0.05), three of which were genotypic correlations among pairs of individual seed weight, seed length, width and thickness. Only the correlation between individual seed weight and seed length had positive and significant phenotypic and genotypic correlation (Table 2). Among the 21 coheritability estimates, only four were negative; all occurring between seed thickness and the three seed metrics ratios (LW, LT and WT) and between seed width with seed length: thickness. The highest positive coheritability was between seed length and width, and the least was between LW and WT (Table 2). Only six PC axes had eigenvalue ≥ 1.0, the six explained 79% of the total variation among the 139 AYB breeding lines and eigenvalues, and variance proportion declined from PC1 to PC6 (Table 3). Contribution to variability among the 139 breeding lines as revealed by eigenvectors loadings identified SCC, SCCP, TBCOVS and PTestaV to be most prominent in PC1 with loadings > 0.30. Prominently in PC2 and PC3, the seven quantitative variables, seed shape and size were most significant, with eigenvectors loadings well above 0.30 (Table 3).

Figure 1. Normal distribution pattern of four seed metrics of the 139 African yam bean accessions.

Table 1. Analysis of variance showing components, descriptive statistics and genetic estimates of the seven quantitative traits employed in the diversity assessment of the 139 African yam bean breeding lines

ANOVA, Analysis of variance; Wgt, Individual seed weight; SL, Seed length; SW, Seed width; ST, Seed thickness; LW, Length to width ratio; LT, Length to thickness ratio; WT, Width to thickness ratio; CoR, Coefficient of range; HB, Broadsense heritability; PCV, Phenotypic coefficient of variation; GCV, Genotypic Coefficient of variation; GA, Genetic advance.

*** – Significance at the probability level of P ≤ 0.001.

Sample size (n) = 139.

Table 2. Phenotypic (p) Genotypic (g) correlation coefficients and coheritability (CoHb) for the seven quantitative traits

Wgt., Individual seed weight; SL, Seed length; SW, Seed width; ST, Seed thickness; LW, Length to width ratio; LT, Length to thickness ratio; WT, Width to thickness ratio.

*, ** – Significance at the probability level of P ≤ 0.05 and 0.01 respectively.

Table 3. Proportions of variance, eigenvalues and eigenvector loadings of the 18 traits in each of the principal component axes

SCC, Seed Coat colour; SCCP, Seed Coat Colour Pattern; TestaTex, Testa Texture; SP Testa, Spliting\Cracking of Testa; Sshape, Seed shape; SEBRI, Seed Brilliance; TB COVS, Testa Basal Colour on Variegated Seed; P Testa V, Pattern of Testa Variegation; TB COVS, Testa Basal Colour on Variegated Seed; ECOWS, Eye Colour of White Seed; sesize, Sizes of Seed.

The 139 AYB breeding lines grouped into four distinct clusters at the inflection point of 0.05 in Fig. 2. Memberships in each of the four cluster were: 29, 46, 19 and 45 respectively. At the inflection point of 0.1 in Fig. 2, clusters I, II and III had merged into a group, furthermore at the similarity coefficient point of 0.185, the 139 breeding lines could no more be distinguished. In Table 4, common features within each cluster were presented. Cluster I had the highest mean for all the seven quantitative traits. Genotypes in cluster I were monocoloured, 62% (white) and 38% (brown). The mostly shining and smooth seeds fell within the medium and large seeds, majority (55%) of which were oblong in shape (Table 4). Least values for individual seed weight, seed length, width and thickness were obtained in cluster II. Within this group, the different forms of possible testa colours in AYB existed, the four possible seed shapes (round, oval, oblong and rhomboid) also existed in different proportions in the cluster. Furthermore, sizes of the 46 breeding lines were within small and medium, more of them were smooth with shining brilliance (Table 4). The 19 genotypes in cluster III had the least values for the three seed metric ratios, 84% were monocoloured. Most of them were round, and few genotypes had oval and oblong shapes. Among the mostly (42%) medium sized-seed breeding lines, 68 and 63% of the breeding lines respectively had matt brilliance and wrinkle testa (Table 4). Cluster IV had the highest proportion (84%) of the breeding lines with mosaic seeds with different patterns in the study. Among the 45 lines in the cluster, percentage shining brilliance was 89 and 71% of the genotypes had medium size (Table 4). Online Supplementary Fig. S1 present arrays of seed sizes, shapes, brilliance, testa colours and colour patterns in AYB.

Figure 2. Dendogram showing aggregation by similarity and partitioning in to groups of 139 African yam bean breeding line.

Table 4. Description of the four clusters generated from the dendrograph based on the quantitative and qualitative traits

Wgt, Individual seed weight; SL, Seed length; SW, Seed width; ST, Seed thickness; LW, Length to width ratio; LT, Length to thickness ratio; WT, Width to thickness ratio; SCC, Seed Coat colour; SCCP, Seed Coat Colour Pattern; TestaTex, Testa Texture; SPTesta, Splitting\Cracking of Testa; Sshape, Seed shape; SEBRI, Seed Brilliance; TBCOVS, Testa Basal Colour on Variegated Seed; PTesta V, Pattern of Testa Variegation; TBCOVS, Testa Basal Colour on Variegated Seed; ECOWS, Eye Colour of White Seed; sesize, Sizes of Seed.

Discussion

Breeding lines are plant breeders' ‘working-germplasm’ during cultivar development programmes. The present study is the first report on characterization of AYB breeding lines; genetic resources for earlier diversity reports had either been accessions and/or landraces. Since they are the genetic materials for future advancement to new cultivars, harnessing the morpho-metric diversity of their seeds was a priority, hence the present investigation. The present study wishes to stage a platform for parental seed stock selection for future cross breeding and hybrid development based on identification of the individual potentials among the lines and the genetic estimate of the studied traits.

The length, width, thickness and their ratios were distinct variables, paired comparison by t-test statistics informed significant differences among them, thereby ascertaining their uniqueness as phenotypic traits capable of employment in descriptors and characterization of AYB. Above information is an update and in consonance with earlier remarks from: Adewale et al. (Reference Adewale, Okonji, Oyekanmi, Akintobi and Aremu2010), Aina et al. (Reference Aina, Ilori, Ukoabasi, Olaniyi, Potter and Abberton2020) and Shitta et al. (Reference Shitta, Unachukwu, Edemodu, Abebe, Oselebe and Abtew2022). The parametric information from the range (minimum to maximum), coefficients of range and variation hinted on the presence of wide variability among the 139 AYB breeding lines for the studied traits, this informs of available diversity among the 139 genotypes. Moreover, higher magnitude for phenotypic and genotypic coefficient of variation informs of inherent wider variability among the genetic resources under study for the specific trait. The present study identified, seed coat colour, seed coat colour pattern, testa basal colour on variegated seed, pattern of testa variegation, seed shape and sizes (single seed weight, dimensional metric measures and their ratios) as very important distinguishing characteristics for AYB seeds. Notable testa colours in AYB include grey, white, light to dark brown, dark purple/black etc. and different forms of variegations or marbling patterns. Qualitative variabilities in AYB ranges in various sizes and intensities. Variations on testa are prominent features in legumes (Cervantes et al., Reference Cervantes, Martín and Saadaoui2016; Bareke, Reference Bareke2019; Bria et al., Reference Bria, Suharyanto and Purnomo2019; Balan and Predeep, Reference Balan and Predeep2021). Seed size, colour and shape have very high taxonomic values to distinctively reveal divergence among genetic resources compared to the vegetative variables (Rana et al., Reference Rana, Sharma, Tyagi, Chahota, Gautam, Singh, Sharma and Ojha2015; Cervantes et al., Reference Cervantes, Martín and Saadaoui2016).

The quantitative traits showed wide range of variability among the 139 breeding lines of AYB. This is in consonance with report of Rana et al. (Reference Rana, Sharma, Tyagi, Chahota, Gautam, Singh, Sharma and Ojha2015) on 4274 accessions of Phaseolus vulgaris and Ruelle et al. (Reference Ruelle, Asfaw, Dejen, Tewolde-Berhan, Nebiyu, Tana and Power2019) who worked on 1296 genetic resources of: Phaseolus vulgaris L., Pisum sativum L., Vicia faba L., Arachis hypogaea L. and Trigonella foenum-graecum L. Nnamani et al. (Reference Nnamani, Awosanmi and Ajayi2021) observed outstanding performances of large-seeded AYB accessions, attributing this to the possession of higher food reserve. This seems to infer that larger seeds hold better promises for higher protein content, larger or heavier seeds could positively correlate with high protein content. Major proteins in pulses are contained in the cotyledon and the embryonic axis of the seed, however, fairly good quantities are present in the seed coat of various legumes (Henchion et al., Reference Henchion, Hayes, Mullen, Fenelon and Tiwari2017). Therefore, selection of W01 with mean individual seed weight of 0.42 g and its recommendation for continual production may be promising for increased protein supply. Moles et al. (Reference Moles, Ackerly, Webb, Tweddle, Dickie and Westoby2005) added that large-seeded species or genotypes have seedlings that are better able to tolerate many of the stresses encountered during seedling establishment. Furthermore, seed weight determines suitability for end-use, heavier seeds commands better market price (N'Danikou et al., Reference N'Danikou, Shango and Sigalla2022).

Proportion of the genetic component in the phenotypic measurements highlights the level of reliability for such traits. For instance, traits whose expression is less dependent on the environment offer significant promises for genetic advance in the breeding programme. High broad sense heritability, genetic advance and very high genotypic:phenotypic coefficient of variability ratio are vital genetic estimates to guide direct selection of the best individuals for successful genetic improvement. The additive component in the broad sense heritabilities of the various traits in this study, was not available, further work is needed to ascertain this. However, the broadsense heritability and genetic gain obtained in this study was like that of Adjei et al. (Reference Adjei, Donkor, Santo, Adarkwah, Boateng, Afreh and Sallah2023). Broadsense heritabilities recorded for seed length (70%) and width (64%) in our study was lower compared to what Rana et al. (Reference Rana, Sharma, Tyagi, Chahota, Gautam, Singh, Sharma and Ojha2015) obtained in the characterization of 4274 Phaeolus vulgaris accessions. Among all the quantitative traits in the study of Bareke (Reference Bareke2019) on some Phaseolus vulgaris genotypes, the highest (0.97) broadsense heritability was obtained in seed length; the same trait had the leading value in the present study. Selection for traits with broadsense heritability ≥ 70% according to Idahosa et al. (Reference Idahosa, Alika and Omoregie2010) is reliable as such magnitude reveals high genetic contribution to the phenotype. However, trait-based selection of genotypes is more reliable if it is dependent on high heritability and genetic advance (Mulualem and Michael, Reference Mulualem and Michael2013).

Bareke (Reference Bareke2019) noted that seed length had a strong and direct relationship with seed width and thickness, our study discovered strong genetic correlation between: individual seed weight, seed length, width and thickness. Selection process in breeding programme is eased when positive correlation (especially genotypic correlation) exists among traits, such situation enhances selection of genotype with numerous associated traits. In this study, heavier seeds of AYB were proportionally longer, wider and thicker. These four traits are therefore well associated such that selection of one had positive, simultaneous and possibly direct influence on the others. The association further inform of the possibility of prediction of values of one trait from another. The significant positive correlation and medium (0.36–0.47) co-heritability of seed weight with seed length, width and thickness showed that selection for any of these traits will proportionally favour simultaneous transmissibility or joint inheritance and improvement of other traits. The reports of Akhtar et al. (Reference Akhtar, Oki, Adachlt and Khan2007) and Farshadfar and Estehghari (Reference Farshadfar and Estehghari2014) corroborated this assertion. The strong genotypic correlation between seed weight and metric measures affirms the possibility of significant improvement of these seed trait simultaneously in AYB breeding.

From the clustering analysis, every genotype was initially distinct at the 0.0 point of similarity coefficient. Variability among the genotypes began to disappear as the inflection point rose beyond 0.0, leading to the assembly of many genotypes into different clusters each with unique similarity for some traits. Seed coat colour of genotypes in each cluster was not homogenous, thus creating within-group variations among genotypes in the same cluster based on testa colours. This seems to inform that testa colour is not the primary delineating variable for the cluster. Rana et al. (Reference Rana, Sharma, Tyagi, Chahota, Gautam, Singh, Sharma and Ojha2015) who had similar observation in Phaseolus vulgaris germplasm suspected random mating among the different coloured groups. Selection of different genotypes has been made possible by the groupings leading to unveiling the potentials within each cluster. For example, genotypes with high seed yield potential appeared in cluster I and cluster III contained genotypes with matt brilliance and wrinkle testa surfaces; significant inferential features for low (shortened) cooking time.

The potentials of the 139 AYB breeding lines for the 18 seed traits, their genetic estimates and diversity among them for the traits is unveiled this study. Possibilities for selection of parents in different clusters for crossbreeding programmes that could enhance the production of heterotic hybrids and discovery of gene actions for different quantitative and qualitative traits is equally presented. This primarily offers a reliable platform for selection. Subsequent genotyping of the same 139 genotypes with single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) technique would be necessary to identify the level of homozygosity/heterozygosity and similarities among genotypes developed through S1, S2 and S3 cycles. The availability of precise genetic profiles through SNP markers for the population can be mapped and correlated with existing phenotypic data, thereby reducing breeding duration and accelerating the crop breeding programme.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479262124000595

Author contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Conceptualization by Adewale, B. D., Material preparation by Odetoye, A. A. and Ibiloye, R.M., methodology and data collection by Paul, M.U., Ojo, G.A., Ogundare, E.B., Fasaanu, A.O. and Aribilola, E.O., analysis were performed by Adewale, B.D. and Ibiloye, R.M. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Adewale, B.D. and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding statement

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received for the conduct of the experiment and the preparation of this manuscript

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethical standard

Research involving Human Participants and/or Animals

None.

Informed consent

None.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

Adewale, BD (2023) African yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa Hochst ex. A. Rich) Harms. In Farooq, M and Siddique, KHM (eds), Neglected and Underutilized Crops: Future Smart Food. London: Academic Press/Elsevier, pp. 487514. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90537-4.00030-2Google Scholar
Adewale, BD and Adegbite, EA (2018) Investigation of the breeding mechanism of African yam bean [Fabaceae] (Sphenostylis stenocarpa Hochst. Ex. A. Rich) Harms. Notulae Scientia Biologicae 10, 199204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adewale, BD and Nnamani, CV (2022) Introduction to food, feed, and health wealth in African yam bean, a locked-in African indigenous tuberous legume. Frontier in Sustainable Food Systems 6, 726458. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.726458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adewale, BD, Okonji, CJ, Oyekanmi, AA, Akintobi, DAC and Aremu, CO (2010) Genotypic variability and stability of some grain yield components of cowpea. African Journal of Agricultural Research 5, 874880.Google Scholar
Adjei, RR, Donkor, EF, Santo, KG, Adarkwah, C, Boateng, AS, Afreh, DN and Sallah, E (2023) A preliminary evaluation of variability, genetic estimates, and association among phenotypic traits of African yam bean landraces from Ghana. Advances in Agriculture 2023, 19. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/1996255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aina, AI, Ilori, CO, Ukoabasi, OE, Olaniyi, O, Potter, D and Abberton, MT (2020) Morphological characterisation and variability analysis of African yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa Hochst. Ex. A. Rich) harms. Int J Plant Res 10, 4552. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.plant.20201003.01Google Scholar
Akhtar, MS, Oki, Y, Adachlt, T and Khan, MHR (2007) Analyses of the genetic parameters (Variability, Heritability, Genetic Advance, Relationship of Yield and Yield Contributing Characters) for some plant traits among Brassica cultivars under phosphorus starved environmental cues. Journal of the Faculty of Environmental Science and Technology, Okayama University 12, 9198.Google Scholar
Balan, AP and Predeep, SV (2021) Legumes of Kerala, India: a checklist. Journal of Threatened Taxa 13, 1825718282. htps://doi.org/10.11609/jot.6475.13.5.18257-18282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bareke, T (2019) Diversity and genetic potential of various morphological traits among common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae) landraces. Biodiversitas 20, 32373245. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d201116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, MW, Gonza, LF, Kimani, PM and Butare, L (2010) Genetic diversity, inter-gene pool introgression and nutritional quality of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) from Central Africa. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 121, 237248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-010-1305-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bria, EJ, Suharyanto, E and Purnomo, L (2019) Variability and intra-specific classification of Lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus L.) from Timor Island based on morphological characters. Journal of Tropical Biodiversity and Biotechnology 04, 6271. https://doi.org/10.22146/jtbb.42547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cervantes, E, Martín, JJ and Saadaoui, E (2016) Updated methods for seed shape analysis. Scientifica 2016, 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5691825CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farshadfar, E and Estehghari, MR (2014) Estimation of genetic architecture for agro-morphological characters in common wheat. International Journal of Biosciences 5, 140147. http://dx.doi.org/10.12692/ijb/5.6.140-147Google Scholar
Hanelt, P and Hammer, K (2011) Classifications of intraspecific variation in crop plants. In Guarino, L, Ramanatha, RV and Goldberg, E (eds), Collecting Plant Genetic Diversity: Technical Guidelines. Rome: CABI and Bioversity International, pp. 115. http://cropgenebank.sgrp.cgiar.org/images/file/procedures/collecting1995/Chapter7.pdfGoogle Scholar
Henchion, M, Hayes, M, Mullen, AM, Fenelon, M and Tiwari, B (2017) Future protein supply and demand: strategies and factors influencing a sustainable equilibrium. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) 6, 122. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods6070053Google ScholarPubMed
Idahosa, DO, Alika, JE and Omoregie, AU (2010) Genetic variability, heritability and expected genetic advance as indices for yield components selection in cowpea. (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp). Academia Arena 2, 2226.Google Scholar
Miller, PA, Williams, JC, Robinson, HF and Comstock, RF (1958) Estimation of genetic and environmental variances and their implications in selections. Agronomy Journal 50, 126131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moles, AT, Ackerly, DD, Webb, CO, Tweddle, JC, Dickie, JB and Westoby, M (2005) A brief history of seed size. Science (New York, N.Y.) 307, 576580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mulualem, T and Michael, GW (2013) Study on genotypic variability estimates and interrelation-ship of agronomic traits for selection of taro (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott) in Ethiopia. Sky Journal of Agricultural Research 2, 132137.Google Scholar
N'Danikou, S, Shango, AJ and Sigalla, JP (2022) Variation of seed traits and initial quality among selected cowpea, mungbean, and soybean accessions. Seeds (new York, N Y ) 1, 303314. https://doi.org/10.3390/seeds1040025Google Scholar
Nnamani, CV, Awosanmi, FE and Ajayi, SA (2021) Screening of African yam bean accessions for imbibition and seed physiological quality. Journal of Agricultural Science 13, 8190. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v13n5p81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rana, JC, Sharma, TR, Tyagi, RK, Chahota, RK, Gautam, NK, Singh, M, Sharma, PN and Ojha, SN (2015) Characterisation of 4274 accessions of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) germplasm conserved in the Indian gene bank for phenological, morphological and agricultural traits. Euphytica 205, 441457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-01-106-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruelle, ML, Asfaw, Z, Dejen, A, Tewolde-Berhan, S, Nebiyu, A, Tana, T and Power, AG (2019) Inter- and intraspecific diversity of food legumes among households and communities in Ethiopia. PLoS ONE 14, e0227074. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227074CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sahu, PK (2013) Research Methodology: A Guide for Researchers in Agricultural Science, Social Science and Other Related Fields. New Delhi: Springer, pp 283319. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1020-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shitta, NS, Unachukwu, N, Edemodu, AC, Abebe, AT, Oselebe, HO and Abtew, WG (2022) Genetic diversity and population structure of an African yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa) collection from IITA GenBank. Scientific Reports 12, 4437. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08271-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, RK and Chaudhury, BD (1985) Biometrical Methods in Quantitative Genetic Analysis. New Delhi: Kalyani Publishers, p. 318.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Normal distribution pattern of four seed metrics of the 139 African yam bean accessions.

Figure 1

Table 1. Analysis of variance showing components, descriptive statistics and genetic estimates of the seven quantitative traits employed in the diversity assessment of the 139 African yam bean breeding lines

Figure 2

Table 2. Phenotypic (p) Genotypic (g) correlation coefficients and coheritability (CoHb) for the seven quantitative traits

Figure 3

Table 3. Proportions of variance, eigenvalues and eigenvector loadings of the 18 traits in each of the principal component axes

Figure 4

Figure 2. Dendogram showing aggregation by similarity and partitioning in to groups of 139 African yam bean breeding line.

Figure 5

Table 4. Description of the four clusters generated from the dendrograph based on the quantitative and qualitative traits

Supplementary material: File

Adewale et al. supplementary material 1

Adewale et al. supplementary material
Download Adewale et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 7.4 MB
Supplementary material: File

Adewale et al. supplementary material 2

Adewale et al. supplementary material
Download Adewale et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 14.9 KB