Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:33:31.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hybridizations within the Genus Schistosoma: implications for evolution, epidemiology and control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2016

ELSA LEGER*
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology and Pathogen Biology, Centre for Emerging, Endemic and Exotic Diseases (CEEED), Royal Veterinary College, University of London, Hertfordshire AL9 7TA, UK
JOANNE P. WEBSTER*
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology and Pathogen Biology, Centre for Emerging, Endemic and Exotic Diseases (CEEED), Royal Veterinary College, University of London, Hertfordshire AL9 7TA, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Department of Pathology and Pathogen Biology, Centre for Emerging, Endemic and Exotic Diseases (CEEED), Royal Veterinary College, University of London, Hertfordshire AL9 7TA, UK. Email: jowebster@rvc.ac.uk
*Corresponding author: Department of Pathology and Pathogen Biology, Centre for Emerging, Endemic and Exotic Diseases (CEEED), Royal Veterinary College, University of London, Hertfordshire AL9 7TA, UK. Email: jowebster@rvc.ac.uk

Summary

Hybridization of parasites is an emerging public health concern in our changing world. Hybridization and introgression in parasites and pathogens can have major impacts on the host and the epidemiology and evolution of disease. Schistosomiasis is a Neglected Tropical Disease of profound medical and veterinary importance across many parts of the world, with the greatest human burden within sub-Saharan Africa. Here we review how early phenotypic identification and recent confirmation through molecular studies on naturally occurring infections, combined with experimental manipulations, have revealed evidence of viable hybridization and introgressions within and between human and animal schistosome species. Environmental and anthropogenic changes in selective pressures following, for instance, new dam constructions, altered agricultural practices, together with mass drug administration programmes, may all be predicted to further impact the availability of suitable definitive and intermediate hosts for schistosomes. It is therefore imperative to understand the distribution and role of such novel zoonotic hybrid schistosomes on host range, drug efficacy, and hence ultimately transmission potential, if we are to achieve and maintain sustainable control.

Type
Special Issue Review
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

INTRODUCTION

The evolution and impact of introgressive hybridization is now well recognized in plants and certain animal species, although examples from within parasitic organisms remain rare (Barton, Reference Barton2001; Arnold, Reference Arnold2004; Baack and Rieseberg, Reference Baack and Rieseberg2007; King et al. Reference King, Stelkens, Webster, Smith and Brockhurst2015). Hybridization (i.e. interbreeding between two species) and introgression (i.e. the introduction of single genes or chromosomal regions from one species into that of another through repeated backcrossing of an interspecific hybrid with one of its parent species) in parasites and pathogens can have a major impact on the host and the epidemiology and evolution of disease. The acquisition of new genes may affect virulence, resistance, pathology and host use and potentially ultimately lead to the evolution and emergence of new parasitic organisms and new diseases (Arnold, Reference Arnold2004; Detwiler and Criscione, Reference Detwiler and Criscione2010; King et al. Reference King, Stelkens, Webster, Smith and Brockhurst2015). Today, in a changing world, hybridization of parasites is an emerging public health concern as the geographic distribution of human, domestic animals and wildlife is altering and novel infectious agents and infectious agent combinations may occur more frequently, including those involving co-infections by parasites from different lineages or species within individual hosts (Patz et al. Reference Patz, Graczyk, Geller and Vittor2000; Slingenbergh et al. Reference Slingenbergh, Gilbert, De Balogh and Wint2004; Lafferty, Reference Lafferty2009; Shuman, Reference Shuman2010; Nichols et al. Reference Nichols, Andersson, Lindgren, Devaux and Semenza2014).

Schistosomiasis (or bilharzia) is a chronic and debilitating disease caused by parasitic trematodes, inducing a range of morbidities including, but not exclusive to, severe anaemia, hypertension and organ damage, sometimes causing death. It affects more than 240 million people, mainly in tropical and sub-tropical regions, and with the greatest burden within sub-Saharan Africa (Steinmann et al. Reference Steinmann, Keiser, Bos, Tanner and Utzinger2006; Colley et al. Reference Colley, Bustinduy, Secor and King2014). There are currently six main species of schistosome infecting humans: Schistosoma mansoni, S. haematobium, S. intercalatum, S. guineensis, S. mekongi and S. japonicum, the latter two species being acknowledged zoonoses (diseases that are naturally transmitted between vertebrate animals and humans), able to infect a broad range of livestock and wildlife. Schistosomiasis is also a disease of substantial veterinary importance (see Fig. 1). It has been estimated that, for instance, about 165 million cattle are infected with schistosomiasis worldwide, with chronic infections resulting in a range of pathologies depending on the infecting species, including haemorrhagic enteritis, anaemia, emaciation and death (De Bont and Vercruysse, Reference De Bont and Vercruysse1997, Reference De Bont and Vercruysse1998). Of the 19 species reported to naturally infect animals, nine have received particular attention, mainly because of their recognized veterinary significance for ruminants in Asia and Africa: S. mattheei, S. bovis, S. curassoni, S. spindale, S. indicum, S. nasale, S. incognitum, S. margrebowiei and S. japonicum. Finally, wild animals also represent significant hosts for schistosomes with, for example, S. rodhaini, S. ovuncatum and S. kisumuensis being schistosome species of rodents. Moreover, rodents and non-human primates can also act as important zoonotic reservoirs, as demonstrated for S. japonicum in Asia (He et al. Reference He, Salafsky and Ramaswamy2001; Rudge et al. Reference Rudge, Lu, Fang, Wang, Basanez and Webster2009, Reference Rudge, Webster, Lu, Wang, Fang and Basanez2013; Lu et al. Reference Lu, Wang, Rudge, Donnelly, Fang and Webster2010b , Reference Lu, Wang, Rudge, Donnelly, Fang and Webster2011) and for S. mansoni in Africa (Fenwick Reference Fenwick1969; Muller-Graf et al. Reference Muller-Graf, Collins, Packer and Woolhouse1997; Duplantier and Sene, Reference Duplantier and Sene2000) and the Caribbean (Théron et al. Reference Théron, Pointier, Morand, Imbertestablet and Borel1992; Théron and Pointier, Reference Théron and Pointier1995).

Fig. 1. Schematic phylogeny of the interrelationships of members of the Schistosoma genus and their principal vertebrate hosts (only indicated for the main schistosome species in term of human and veterinary health) (adapted from Lawton et al. (Reference Lawton, Hirai, Ironside, Johnston and Rollinson2011) and Webster et al. (Reference Webster, Southgate and Littlewood2006)).

Schistosoma spp. have an asexual stage occurring in an invertebrate intermediate host, a freshwater snail, and a sexual stage within the vascular system of a definitive vertebrate host; parasite eggs are voided with the definitive host's urine or feces, depending on the infecting parasite species. One exception being S. nasale, where adult pairs are located in the blood vessels of the nasal mucosa and eggs are excreted through nasal discharge. Schistosomes are dioecious, rather than hermaphroditic as it is the case for most other trematodes. This potentially creates enhanced opportunities for interactions between male and female schistosomes within their definitive host. Several schistosome species also overlap in their geographical and host range, which allows males and female schistosomes of difference species to pair within their definitive hosts. It was traditionally believed that the combination of host specificity and physiological barriers (i.e. intestinal schistosomes being located around the mesenteric system as adults, urogenital schistosomes are nearby the bladder) would prevent heterospecific interactions or pairings to occur (Jourdane and Southgate, Reference Jourdane and Southgate1992; Southgate et al. Reference Southgate, Jourdane and Tchuem Tchuenté1998). However, subsequent evidence revealed that closely related species, in particular S. haematobium with S. mattheei and S. haematobium with S. guineesis (previously known as S. intercalatum) have the potential, and the propensity, to pair and hybridize both in the wild and experimentally in the laboratory (Taylor, Reference Taylor1970; Morgan et al. Reference Morgan, Dejong, Lwambo, Mungai, Mkoji and Loker2003; Webster and Southgate, Reference Webster and Southgate2003b ; Webster et al. Reference Webster, Diaw, Seye, Webster and Rollinson2013b ). Even distantly related schistosome species such as S. mansoni and S. haematobium often pair (Khalil and Mansour, Reference Khalil and Mansour1995; Cunin et al. Reference Cunin, Tchuem Tchuenté, Poste, Djibrilla and Martin2003; Koukounari et al. Reference Koukounari, Donnelly, Sacko, Keita, Landoure, Dembele, Bosque-Oliva, Gabrielli, Gouvras, Traore, Fenwick and Webster2010). Whilst such pairings are likely to result predominantly in parthenogenetic egg production, recent molecular evidence suggests that under certain conditions, such distance pairings may also result in introgression and the production of viable offspring (Huyse et al. Reference Huyse, Webster, Geldof, Stothard, Diaw, Polman and Rollinson2009).

Here we review studies performed on natural and experimental schistosome hybrids and discuss how new molecular tools have improved our understanding of the evolution and epidemiology of these hybrids. We consider the factors that may be predicted to further influence the potential for novel zoonotic hybrid parasites to emerge and establish and present the theoretical and applied implications and applications for both schistosomiasis and other important host–parasite associations that impact humans, livestock and wildlife today and in the future.

HISTORY OF THE SCIENTIFIC WORK UNCOVERING THE EVOLUTION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF SCHISTOSOMA HYBRIDS

From some of the earliest scientific literature on schistosomes, evidence of potential crosses and hybridizations between different species of schistosomes have been reported. These first identifications were mainly based on phenotypic eggs observations. For example, Alves in 1948 reported potential S. haematobiumS. mattheei hybrids amongst cases of human urogenital schistosomiasis in Southern Rhodesia, Zimbabwe (Alves, Reference Alves1948). This observation was followed by several others proposing the existence of the same hybrids occurring in both Zimbabwe and South Africa (Le Roux, Reference Le Roux1954b ; Pitchford, Reference Pitchford1959, Reference Pitchford1961; Kruger et al. Reference Kruger, Hamilton-Attwell and Schutte1986a , Reference Kruger, Schutte, Visser and Evans b ; Kruger and Hamilton-Attwell, Reference Kruger and Hamilton-Attwell1988), as well as other potential hybridized pairings, predominantly between S. haematobium with S. guineensis in Cameroon (Wright et al. Reference Wright, Southgate, Vanwijk and Moore1974; Southgate et al. Reference Southgate, Vanwijk and Wright1976; Rollinson and Southgate, Reference Rollinson, Southgate, Rollinson and Anderson1985; Ratard et al. Reference Ratard, Kouemeni, Bessala, Ndamkou, Greer, Spilsbury and Cline1990; Ratard and Greer, Reference Ratard and Greer1991; Tchuem Tchuenté et al. Reference Tchuem Tchuenté, Southgate, Njiokou, Njine, Kouemeni and Jourdane1997b ) and Gabon (Burchard and Kern, Reference Burchard and Kern1985; Zwingenberger et al. Reference Zwingenberger, Feldmeier, Bienzle and Steiner1990) (see Table 1). However, the viability of these eggs was rarely, if ever, assessed and these early phenotypic observations have often been considered, or even dismissed, as misleading identifications (Teesdale, Reference Teesdale1976; Kinoti and Mumo, Reference Kinoti and Mumo1988). Likewise, early reports of apparent human infections with pure animal Schistosoma spp., such as S. bovis, S. curassoni or S. mattheei (Raper, Reference Raper1951; Grétillat, Reference Grétillat1962; Albaret et al. Reference Albaret, Picot, Diaw, Bayssadedufour, Vassiliades, Adamson, Luffau and Chabaud1985; Chunge et al. Reference Chunge, Katsivo, Kok, Wamwea and Kinoti1986; Mouchet et al. Reference Mouchet, Develoux and Magasa1988), as were based primarily on egg morphologies, were again subsequently dismissed as misdiagnoses (Capron et al. Reference Capron, Deblock, Biguet, Clay, Adenis and Vernes1965; Vercruysse et al. Reference Vercruysse, Southgate and Rollinson1984; Rollinson et al. Reference Rollinson, Vercruysse, Southgate, Mooreo, Ross, Walker, Knowles, Geerts, Kumar and Brandt1987; Kruger and Evans, Reference Kruger and Evans1990; Brémond et al. Reference Brémond, Sellin, Sellin, Naméoua, Labbo, Theron and Combes1993). The use of biochemical markers confirmed, however, some of the earlier phenotypic observations made on schistosome hybrids, albeit not of any apparent cases of pure animal schistosome species infecting humans, and furthermore revealed new hybridization between different species. The first study on hybrid schistosomes using isoelectric-focusing of enzymes was made by Wright and Ross (Reference Wright and Ross1980), which confirmed hybridization between S. haematobium with S. mattheei in Eastern Transvaal, South Africa. By the 1990s, studies reported hybridization between S. bovis with S. curassoni in cattle, sheep and goats through the identification of gene flow using biochemical markers (Brémond, Reference Brémond1990; Brémond et al. Reference Brémond, Mouchet, Chevallier, Sellin, Vera and Sellin1990; Rollinson et al. Reference Rollinson, Southgate, Vercruysse and Moore1990a ). Likewise, by 1993, Brémond et al. (Reference Brémond, Sellin, Sellin, Naméoua, Labbo, Theron and Combes1993) used both morphological and biochemical markers to assess, for the first time, natural introgression of S. haematobium by genes from S. bovis in Niger.

Table 1. Reports of potential natural hybridizations

The increasing use of molecular techniques available for parasitological research resulted in a growing number of reports on hybridization and introgression in schistosomes. Furthermore, these are providing new insights for understanding the evolution and epidemiology of the disease. For instance, new methods have been developed which can discriminate between different schistosomes species and their hybrids, in particular multi-locus approaches, combining both nuclear and mitochondrial DNA markers, as single-locus approaches are not appropriate to detect hybridization or introgression events (Norton et al. Reference Norton, Webster, Kane and Rollinson2008b ; Huyse et al. Reference Huyse, Webster, Geldof, Stothard, Diaw, Polman and Rollinson2009; Webster et al. Reference Webster, Rollinson, Stothard and Huyse2010a ). The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) is a particularly powerful marker to detect introgression. This region can retain both parental copies for several generations before they are homogenized by concerted evolution, the nuclear DNA profiles resulting in double chromatogram peaks at the species-specific mutation sites (Dover Reference Dover1986; Sang et al. Reference Sang, Crawford and Stuessy1995; Aguilar et al. Reference Aguilar, Rossello and Feliner1999; Kane et al. Reference Kane, Bartley, Stothard, Vercruysse, Rollinson and Southgate2002; Huyse et al. Reference Huyse, Webster, Geldof, Stothard, Diaw, Polman and Rollinson2009, Reference Huyse, Van Den Broeck, Hellemans, Volckaert and Polman2013; Webster et al. Reference Webster, Diaw, Seye, Webster and Rollinson2013b ; Moné et al. Reference Moné, Holtfreter, Allienne, Mintsa-NguéMa, Ibikounlé, Boissier, Berry, Mitta, Richter and Mouahid2015). The ITS marker has therefore repeatedly been used to detect hybridization events across the Schistosoma genera. Webster et al. (Reference Webster, Tchuem Tchuenté and Southgate2007) used a single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis of the second internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) of nuclear ribosomal DNA for the identification of S. haematobium, S. guineensis and their hybrids in Loum, Cameroon. This analysis revealed that some individuals previously considered to be S. haematobium, based on egg morphology and sequence data alone, were actually hybrids and this would not have been detected without employing such high-resolution analysis. Recent studies in Senegal, using sequence data of nuclear (ITS1+2) and mitochondrial (cox1) loci, reported the bidirectional hybridization between S. haematobium with S. bovis and S. haematobium with S. curassoni in school children and also in both Bulinus snails and between S. bovis with S. curassoni in cattle (Huyse et al. Reference Huyse, Webster, Geldof, Stothard, Diaw, Polman and Rollinson2009; Webster et al. Reference Webster, Diaw, Seye, Webster and Rollinson2013b ). Molecular analyses on cercariae from infected snails in Kenya and Tanzania have also observed hybrids between the human schistosome S. mansoni and its sister species, S. rodhaini, from rodents (Morgan et al. Reference Morgan, Dejong, Lwambo, Mungai, Mkoji and Loker2003; Steinauer et al. Reference Steinauer, Hanelt, Mwangi, Maina, Agola, Kinuthia, Mutuku, Mungai, Wilson, Mkoji and Loker2008). Furthermore, these authors, using microsatellite markers, demonstrated that the hybrids produce viable offspring through first or successive generation backcrosses with S. mansoni (Steinauer et al. Reference Steinauer, Hanelt, Mwangi, Maina, Agola, Kinuthia, Mutuku, Mungai, Wilson, Mkoji and Loker2008). More recently, studies combining epidemiological molecular and nuclear data have also revealed potential rare introgressions between the two major human schistosome species in Africa, S. haematobium with S. mansoni (Meurs et al. Reference Meurs, Mbow, Vereecken, Menten, Mboup and Polman2012; Huyse et al. Reference Huyse, Van Den Broeck, Hellemans, Volckaert and Polman2013), a phylogenetically distant pairing previously believed to result in unviable eggs exclusively through parthenogenesis (Khalil and Mansour, Reference Khalil and Mansour1995; Webster et al. Reference Webster, Southgate and Tchuem Tchuenté1999; Cunin et al. Reference Cunin, Tchuem Tchuenté, Poste, Djibrilla and Martin2003; Koukounari et al. Reference Koukounari, Donnelly, Sacko, Keita, Landoure, Dembele, Bosque-Oliva, Gabrielli, Gouvras, Traore, Fenwick and Webster2010). The use of molecular tools also allows identification of the direction of introgression. For example, Steinauer et al. (Reference Steinauer, Hanelt, Mwangi, Maina, Agola, Kinuthia, Mutuku, Mungai, Wilson, Mkoji and Loker2008) observed unidirectional gene flow from the rodent schistosome S. rodhaini to the human S. mansoni, whereas there appears to be bidirectional hybridization between the S. haematobium with S. bovis or S. curassoni hybrids described above.

There is, to date, no evidences of hybrids in Asia where S. japonicum and S. mekongi overlap, although experimental crossing of these two species has been achieved (Kruatrachue et al. Reference Kruatrachue, Upatham, Sahaphong, Tongthong and Khunborivan1987). Reports of potential schistosome hybrids are distributed across much of Africa, but it appears with predominance within West Africa (Table 1). This is a region both with multiple species of schistosomes, of humans and animals, naturally circulating, and of profound poverty.

Thus, through the use of either molecular or biochemical tools or phenotypic analyses, various combinations of Schistosoma spp. hybrids have been documented repeatedly within snails, livestock, wildlife and within humans. Moreover, these heterospecific crosses are between animal schistosome species (e.g. S. bovis with S. curassoni); human schistosome species (e.g. S. guineensis with S. haematobium); and perhaps most importantly and interestingly epidemiologically and clinically, between human schistosome species with animal schistosome species (e.g. S. mansoni with S. rodhaini or S. haematobium with S. bovis or S. curassoni or S. mattheei). However, to date, zoonotic hybrids between S. haematobium with S. bovis or S. curassoni have been reported in humans and snails but never from livestock, although past attempts at research therein have been rare and sporadic and bladder and urine from livestock have never been inspected (e.g. Vercruysse et al. Reference Vercruysse, Southgate and Rollinson1984; Webster et al. Reference Webster, Diaw, Seye, Faye, Stothard, Sousa-Figueiredo and Rollinson2013b ). This is particularly important as S. haematobium males have been shown to be dominant over other species such as S. mansoni, S. mattheei or S. guineensis, and to take females to the urogenital tract (Southgate et al. Reference Southgate, Vanwijk and Wright1976, Reference Southgate, Rollinson, Ross and Knowles1982, Reference Southgate, Tchuem Tchuenté, Vercruysse and Jourdane1995; Webster et al. Reference Webster, Southgate and Tchuem Tchuenté1999; Cunin et al. Reference Cunin, Tchuem Tchuenté, Poste, Djibrilla and Martin2003; Cosgrove and Southgate, Reference Cosgrove and Southgate2003a ; Webster and Southgate, Reference Webster and Southgate2003b ; Koukounari et al. Reference Koukounari, Donnelly, Sacko, Keita, Landoure, Dembele, Bosque-Oliva, Gabrielli, Gouvras, Traore, Fenwick and Webster2010; Gouvras et al. Reference Gouvras, Kariuki, Koukounari, Norton, Lange, Ireri, Fenwick, Mkoji and Webster2013).

Concurrent with research under field conditions, hybridization experiments in the laboratory began in the 1940s. Some were conducted between schistosome species that are unlikely to hybridize in the wild, because they have not shared the same geographical range [e.g. S. mansoni with S. japonicum (Vogel, Reference Vogel1941, Reference Vogel1942; Imbert-Establet et al. Reference Imbert-Establet, Xia and Jourdane1994; Fan and Lin, Reference Fan and Lin2005)]. These distant pairings were reported to result in the production of non-viable or apparently parthenogenetic eggs. Likewise, the experimental crosses conducted between the two phylogenetically distant species S. mansoni and S. haematobium, S. guineensis or S. mattheei also resulted in non-viable or parthenogenetic eggs (Taylor et al. Reference Taylor, Amin and Mbnelson1969; Tchuem Tchuenté et al. Reference Tchuem Tchuenté, Imbertestablet, Southgate and Jourdane1994; Khalil and Mansour, Reference Khalil and Mansour1995; Webster et al. Reference Webster, Southgate and Tchuem Tchuenté1999). Several experimental studies in laboratory have, however, confirmed that certain closely related schistosome species can successfully hybridize for several generations. Most of experimental research on interspecies crosses has been conducted within the S. haematobium group species (see the list of all crossings in Table 2). In the S. mansoni group, successful experimental crossings have been repeatedly performed only between S. mansoni with S. rodhaini (Le Roux, Reference Le Roux1954a ; Taylor, Reference Taylor1970; Brémond et al. Reference Brémond, Théron and Rollinson1989; Théron, Reference Théron1989; Norton et al. Reference Norton, Webster, Kane and Rollinson2008b ). It appears that the successfully hybridization, or not, of these pairings will vary in part with the geographical origin as well as the strain of the parasite. For example, Taylor (Reference Taylor1970) observed that the cross between a S. haematobium from Nigeria and S. bovis from Iran was viable, while the cross between S. haematobium and S. bovis both from Iran was of very low viability. Also, Wright and Ross (Reference Wright and Ross1980) showed that F1 hybrids issued from the cross between S. haematobium from Durban and female S. mattheei from Transvaal presented heterosis (i.e. hybrid vigour), whereas the same crossing with S. mattheei from Zambia with S. haematobium from the Ivory Coast did not (Tchuem Tchuenté et al. Reference Tchuem Tchuenté, Southgate, Jourdane, Kaukas and Vercruysse1997a ). More importantly, even viable crosses of the same species are not always reciprocal. For example, crossing only produces viable and fertile hybrid descendants between male S. haematobium and female S. guineensis or female S. mattheei (Wright et al. Reference Wright, Southgate, Vanwijk and Moore1974; Wright and Ross, Reference Wright and Ross1980; Tchuem Tchuenté et al. Reference Tchuem Tchuenté, Southgate, Jourdane, Kaukas and Vercruysse1997a ; Southgate et al. Reference Southgate, Jourdane and Tchuem Tchuenté1998). However, crossings between S. haematobium and S. bovis or S. curassoni appear bidirectional and involve both male and female of each species (Huyse et al. Reference Huyse, Webster, Geldof, Stothard, Diaw, Polman and Rollinson2009; Webster et al. Reference Webster, Diaw, Seye, Webster and Rollinson2013b ). One hypothesis could be that laboratory studies will mainly be on F1 crosses, whereas molecular analyses on parasites from natural population in the field will detect repeated backcrossing and hence more evidences of bidirectional introgression.

Table 2. Reports of experimental hybridizations

Unless stated, offspring viability has not been determined after the generation indicated.

Further experimental infections and crossings are required to study the mating behaviour of different schistosome species and to study the biological characteristics of the hybrid lines such as fecundity, infectivity, longevity, cercariae production and response to praziquantel, the drug routinely used to control human schistosomiasis, and, in some parts of the world, in Asia for example, animal schistosomiasis too. However, we must keep in mind that the laboratory system might bias studies on hybridization due to selection and genetic bottleneck events because of less compatible rodent or snail hosts in experimental infections. Most of the crossings performed to date have been obtained in rodents and we do not know yet how hybrids would develop in other mammalian hosts, in particular domestic livestock other than sheep, which may be predicted to be potentially more relevant to ongoing natural transmission cycles.

There also remains a great deal to elucidate concerning the genetics and genomics of hybridization and introgression across the Schistosoma genus and in parasites in general, such as, for example, how hybridization may affect spread and pathogenicity. Genetic introgression could occur in areas of the genome affecting the evolution of virulence, transmission and host specificity, among others characteristics. Modern molecular techniques can expose the signature of hybridization in the genome more rapidly and accurately and the recent whole genome sequencing of the three main human schistosome species S. japonicum, S. mansoni and S. haematobium (Berriman et al. Reference Berriman, Haas, Loverde, Wilson, Dillon, Cerqueira, Mashiyama, Al-Lazikani, Andrade, Ashton, Aslett, Bartholomeu, Blandin, Caffrey, Coghlan, Coulson, Day, Delcher, Demarco, Djikeng, Eyre, Gamble, Ghedin, Gu, Hertz-Fowler, Hirai, Hirai, Houston, Ivens, Johnston, Lacerda, Macedo, Mcveigh, Ning, Oliveira, Overington, Parkhill, Pertea, Pierce, Protasio, Quail, Rajandream, Rogers, Sajid, Salzberg, Stanke, Tivey, White, Williams, Wortman, Wu, Zamanian, Zerlotini, Fraser-Liggett, Barrell and El-Sayed2009; Schistosoma japonicum Genome Sequencing and Functional Analysis Consortium 2009; Young et al. Reference Young, Jex, Li, Liu, Yang, Xiong, Li, Cantacessi, Hall, Xu, Chen, Wu, Zerlotini, Oliveira, Hofmann, Zhang, Fang, Kang, Campbell, Loukas, Ranganathan, Rollinson, Rinaldi, Brindley, Yang, Wang, Wang and Gasser2012) will undoubtedly provide new insights into the study of schistosomes’ hybridization and Neglected Tropical Diseases research in general (Webster et al. Reference Webster, Oliviera, Rollinson and Gower2010b ).

EFFECT OF HYBRIDIZATION ON CERCARIAL EMERGENCE FROM SNAIL INTERMEDIATE HOST

Cercarial emergence is a heritable trait shaped by the definitive hosts’ behaviour and this can vary within species, as Lu et al. (Reference Lu, Wang, Rudge, Donnelly, Fang and Webster2009) observed within S. japonicum with two different emergence peaks, one in late afternoon emergence compatible with a nocturnal rodent reservoir, and one early emergence consistent with a diurnal cattle reservoir. Norton et al. (Reference Norton, Rollinson, Richards and Webster2008a ) also showed that co-infection and therefore competition between S. mansoni and S. rodhaini was influencing cercarial chronobiology resulting in a slight shift in the S. mansoni shedding pattern and a reduction of the S. rodhaini shedding period. In hybrids with different definitive host species, one could predict different chronobiology of cercariae shedding emergence depending on their relative parental species. Evidence in support of this has been provided by Théron (Reference Théron1989) with hybrids between S. mansoni with S. rodhaini showing two unequal emergence peaks, one diurnal (characteristic of S. mansoni for human infection) and the other nocturnal (characteristic of S. rodhaini for rodents’ infection). Depending on the chronobiological strain of S. mansoni used in the cross-breeding it was either the diurnal peak (when the early strain of S. mansoni was used), or the nocturnal peak (when the late strain of S. mansoni was used), that is preponderant. This could also explain some patterns of excretion observed by Norton et al. (Reference Norton, Rollinson, Richards and Webster2008a ) as some of the S. rodhaini and S. mansoni are likely to have hybridized. Finally, experimental crosses conducted between S. haematobium, S. guineensis and S. bovis, revealed a cercarial emission pattern amongst F1 hybrids with only one emergence peak, but with a mean shedding time always in advance (from 1 to 5 h depending on the crossing) of those of the respective parental species, except for S. bovis from which no difference was observed (Pages and Theron, Reference Pages and Theron1990). The authors explained this modification by a greater sensibility of the hybrids to synchronization with photoperiod. Also, as cercariae can survive in the environment for several hours, one could proposed that an earlier shedding time would allow them to infect all the potential definitive host of their parental species, and hence give them a selective transmission advantage relative to their later shedding counterparts. These studies to date were, however, all performed using experimental laboratory infections and crossings. The only monitoring of hybrids cercarial emergence from natural infections to date was performed by Steinauer et al. (Reference Steinauer, Hanelt, Mwangi, Maina, Agola, Kinuthia, Mutuku, Mungai, Wilson, Mkoji and Loker2008) on S. mansoni with S. rodhaini hybrids collected from B. sudanica and B. pfeifferi in Western Kenya. Species were subsequentally identified using microsatellites, rDNA and mtDNA markers. They observed that most of the hybrids showed an emergence pattern similar to that of S. mansoni, except for one individual, that presented a bimodal emergence pattern that was characteristic of both parental species.

FACTORS POTENTIALLY FAVOURING HYBRID EVOLUTION AND ESTABLISHMENT

Environmental and/or anthropogenic changes, through natural phenomena (e.g. climate change) or human activities, such as dam constructions, changes in agricultural practices or drug treatments, can substantially impact the dynamics and distribution of schistosomiasis and infectious diseases in general, with potential positive and negative effects upon human and animal health (King et al. Reference King, Stelkens, Webster, Smith and Brockhurst2015). These environmental and anthropogenic changes place selective pressures on human and animal schistosomes and increase the opportunities for mixing of different species. This mixing within the human or animal hosts may be predicted to further influence the potential for novel zoonotic hybrid parasites, which may impact their potential for disease transmission and morbidity (Fig. 2). For example, it has been suggested that local deforestation may have altered the environment in Loum area (Cameroon) and allowed Bulinus truncatus (previously named B. rohfsi), the intermediate host for S. haematobium, to become established, and, the increase of human exchanges through the introductions of the railways created areas of sympatry between S. guineensis and S. haematobium, leading to the formation of hybrids (Southgate et al. Reference Southgate, Vanwijk and Wright1976; Southgate, Reference Southgate1978).

Fig. 2. Schematic of causes and consequences of schistosome hybridization. The circumstances producing increased opportunity for hybridization are intensification of drug administration, agricultural practices and land use and modifications of environment due to human activities. This will then modify the ecology of both schistosomes’ intermediate and definitive host but also biology of the parasites. We outline what we think would be the most important and/or potentially dangerous effects of hybridization: an increase in transmission potential and morbidity and an altered response to drug therapy.

In the north of Senegal, the rehabilitation of the Lac de Guiers area (Mbaye, Reference Mbaye2013) provided new accesses to freshwater. These new contact areas are used both by people and livestock and are important sites where mixing of animals and humans schistosome species can happen. Likewise in Senegal, the construction of Diama dam on the Senegal river, for the creation of irrigation canals and development and extension of rice culture in the Senegal River basin, resulted in a reduction in salinity and more stable water flow, with a subsequent occurrence of new outbreaks of schistosomiasis, as well as other trematodiases, in humans and livestock in this region (Vercruysse et al. Reference Vercruysse, Southgate, Rollinson, Declercq, Sacko, Debont and Mungomba1994; Diaw et al. Reference Diaw, Vassiliades, Thiongane, Seye, Sarr and Diouf1998). N'Goran et al. (Reference N'goran, Diabate, Utzinger and Sellin1997) also observed a strong increase in human urogenital schistosomiasis prevalence around the Kossou and Taabo Lakes in Côte d'Ivoire between 1970 and 1992 after the construction of the two Dams of Kossou and Taabo.

The recent deliberate crossing/hybridization of local cattle breeds with European cattle, in an effort to increase milk and meat yield (Nicolas Diouf, personal communications), in Senegal may also be predicted to have consequences on the spreading of zoonotic hybrid schistosomes These new hybrid cattle may be predicted to have different susceptibilities for schistosome establishments and infection. The introduction of exotic cattle has already proved to accelerate the spread of several parasitic organisms. For example, the southern cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, initially a parasite of Asian bovid species, has spread over the tropical and subtropical belts to become a major invasive pest in many agrosystems (Barré and Uilenberg, Reference Barré and Uilenberg2010). Its current geographic distribution and its dramatic expansion over the last century can primarily be explained by the introduction of highly susceptible European cattle (Bos taurus) breeds to tropical areas (Chevillon et al. Reference Chevillon, De Garine-Wichatitsky, Barre, Ducornez and De Meeus2013; Léger et al. Reference Léger, Vourc'h, Vial, Chevillon and Mccoy2013). In contrast to both wild and domestic tropical Bovidae, these introduced hosts of European origin are almost incapable of mounting efficient immune responses to R. microplus infestations (Frisch, Reference Frisch1999).

Temperature, among other factors, can also have a significant effect on the schistosome life cycle and the survival of its intermediate snail host (Mas-Coma et al. Reference Mas-Coma, Adela Valero and Dolores Bargues2009). Climate change (e.g. desertification) taking place in West Africa has also been argued to be responsible for important changes in the movement of domestic livestock, where animals may have to move long distance for food and water and may be in contact with multiple potential transmission sites. Indeed such livestock movement changes have been proposed to have brought S. bovis and S. curassoni into contact and may have led to hybridization between them (Rollinson et al. Reference Rollinson, Southgate, Vercruysse and Moore1990a ). In addition to human and animal movements, the current climate of global warming may also offer the potential to novel zoonotic hybrids to be a global disease. Many schistosome species infecting livestock could have a broader geographical range beyond Asia and Africa if compatible snail intermediate hosts are present. This appears now the case in parts of Europe, where novel introgressed hybrids between human S. haematobium with the livestock S. bovis have recently been identified in Corsica (France), and sporadically in Spain and Portugal, with substantial ongoing transmission amongst both local Corsican residents and tourists (De Laval et al. Reference De Laval, Savini, Biance-Valero and Simon2014; Boissier et al. Reference Boissier, Moné, Mitta, Dolores Bargues, Molyneux and Mas-Coma2015; Moné et al. Reference Moné, Holtfreter, Allienne, Mintsa-NguéMa, Ibikounlé, Boissier, Berry, Mitta, Richter and Mouahid2015; Berry et al. Reference Berry, Fillaux, Martin-Blondel, Boissier, Iriart, Marchou, Magnaval and Delobel2016; Webster et al. Reference Webster, Gower, Knowles, Molyneux and Fenton2016).

IMPLICATIONS FOR CONTROL

The recurrent hybridization between schistosome species in nature may have major implications in light of the current global push and shift from controlling morbidity to interrupting transmission (Webster et al. Reference Webster, Molyneux, Hotez and Fenwick2014). How such introgression may alter host range and transmission dynamic is perhaps the most pressing area for future research (King et al. Reference King, Stelkens, Webster, Smith and Brockhurst2015) (Fig. 2).

Since the first observations of hybridization of animal and human schistosomes, the main concern has been the possible complication of control measures occasioned by the existence of an animal reservoir infection (Wright and Southgate, Reference Wright, Southgate, Taylor and Muller1976; Wright and Ross, Reference Wright and Ross1980). Indeed, schistosomiasis control has focused almost exclusively on treatment of humans with mass drug administration using praziquantel. However, the extent to which hybridization may increase the role of wild mammals and livestock as reservoir hosts for infection, due to hybrid vigour for example, is poorly understood, although it is widely accepted that zoonotic diseases may be harder to eliminate due to the presence of animal reservoirs driving ongoing transmission (Webster et al. Reference Webster, Gower, Knowles, Molyneux and Fenton2016). It has been shown that S. haematobium alone is incapable of developing in sheep (Vercruysse et al. Reference Vercruysse, Southgate and Rollinson1984), but S. haematobium with S. mattheei hybrids have that ability (Tchuem Tchuenté et al. Reference Tchuem Tchuenté, Southgate, Jourdane, Kaukas and Vercruysse1997a ). Similarly, Taylor et al. (Reference Taylor, Nelson, Smith and Andrews1973) and Vercruysse et al. (Reference Vercruysse, Southgate and Rollinson1984) showed experimentally that S. bovis or S. curassoni cannot infect baboons as a single species, but they can when hybridized with S. haematobium. Hybrids between S. mansoni with S. rodhaini in Kenya may also be predicted to prove problematic, particularly in the elimination era. Rodents are reservoirs for several schistosome single species (S. mansoni, S. bovis, S. rodhaini, S. kisumuensis. S. mansoni and S. rodhaini), and co-infections in a single host individual has been observed, suggesting that this host species could be responsible for the production of hybrid schistosomes found in the area (Hanelt et al. Reference Hanelt, Mwangi, Kinuthia, Maina, Agola, Mutuku, Steinauer, Agwanda, Kigo, Mungai, Loker and Mkoji2010). In a worst-case scenario, one could predict that this could lead to a comparable situation as observed in China today, where after over 50 years of concerted and multi-faceted interventions (including chemotherapy, snail control, health education, sanitation and environmental improvement), S. japonicum remains endemic among humans and transmission has even re-emerged in some areas where schistosomiasis was thought to have been eliminated. It has been demonstrated, by combining field data with novel mathematical modelling, that spillover from animal zoonotic transmission is maintaining such human schistosomiasis in China (Lu et al. Reference Lu, Wang, Rudge, Donnelly, Fang and Webster2009, Reference Lu, Rudge, Wang, Donnelly, Fang and Webster2010a , Reference Lu, Wang, Rudge, Donnelly, Fang and Webster b , Reference Lu, Wang, Rudge, Donnelly, Fang and Webster2011; Rudge et al. Reference Rudge, Lu, Fang, Wang, Basanez and Webster2009, Reference Rudge, Webster, Lu, Wang, Fang and Basanez2013).

There are also other potential serious implications of wide-scale hybridization events in nature. For instance, introgressive hybridization may lead to phenotypic changes that can dramatically influence disease dynamics and evolution of the parasites. Hybridization between different Schistosoma species have already been suggested to affect the success of drug treatment; Pitchford and Lewis (Reference Pitchford and Lewis1978) have suggested that the poor response of S. mattheei to oxamniquine treatment in children, in a trial they conducted in Eastern Transvaal, may be due to hybridization with S. haematobium, which is not susceptible to the drug. Although the efficacy of praziquantel, which is currently the only anti-schistosome drug in wide-scale use, is not well documented in terms of livestock, as distinct from human, Schistososoma species, changes in mass drug administration (MDA) pressures could be predicted to play an important role in the evolution of hybrid schistosomes. Drug resistance or decreased sensitivity of S. mansoni to praziquantel has been documented under both field and laboratory conditions (Cioli et al. Reference Cioli, Pica-Mattoccia and Archer1993; Fallon and Doenhoff, Reference Fallon and Doenhoff1994; Bonesso-Sabadini and de Souza Dias, Reference Bonesso-Sabadini and De Souza Dias2002; Botros et al. Reference Botros, Sayed, Amer, El-Ghannam, Bennett and Day2005; Alonso et al. Reference Alonso, Munoz, Gascon, Valls and Corachan2006; Melman et al. Reference Melman, Steinauer, Cunningham, Kubatko, Mwangi, Wynn, Mutuku, Karanja, Colley, Black, Secor, Mkoji and Loker2009; Pica-Mattoccia et al. Reference Pica-Mattoccia, Doenhoff, Valle, Basso, Troiani, Liberti, Festucci, Guidi and Cioli2009; Lamberton et al. Reference Lamberton, Hogan, Kabatereine, Fenwick and Webster2010; Valentim et al. Reference Valentim, Cioli, Chevalier, Cao, Taylor, Holloway, Pica-Mattoccia, Guidi, Basso, Tsai, Berriman, Carvalho-Queiroz, Almeida, Aguilar, Frantz, Hart, Loverde and Anderson2013; Webster et al. Reference Webster, Diaw, Seye, Faye, Stothard, Sousa-Figueiredo and Rollinson2013a ). To which extent hybrid schistosomes may differ in terms of praziquantel efficacy, and how MDA could differentially select for hybrids, is not known but should be considered in the control of schistosomiasis (Fenwick and Webster, Reference Fenwick and Webster2006; Webster et al. Reference Webster, Gower and Norton2008, Reference Webster, Molyneux, Hotez and Fenwick2014). Hybridization and the occurrence of large animal reservoirs may, however, also have a positive role in the context of reducing the risk of drug resistance emergence or establishment by increasing the proportion of untreated worms, and hence Refugia, through the untreated animal host populations. Human infection could also be reduced as selection imposed by drug treatment in humans may be predicted to lead to a shift in host preference, favouring strains that prefer nonhuman hosts. Conversely, if livestock, particularly in Africa, were to also be intensively treated with praziquantel in the future, then the risk of drug resistance emerging would be exacerbated. This could be due both to the relative loss of Refugia, but also the increased risk of resistance developing in the veterinary field through treatment mismanagement, as has been the case with all the current veterinary anthelmintics to date, and its subsequent impact for human treatment, particularly critical for zoonotic hybrids (Webster et al. Reference Webster, Gower, Knowles, Molyneux and Fenton2016).

Hybrid infections may also be predicted to result in a differential morbidity profile in both humans and livestock, relative to their single-species infection counterparts. Schistosomiasis morbidity is caused primarily by parasite eggs being trapped within the host tissues. Previous studies have reported higher bladder morbidity in mixed S. haematobiumS. mansoni mixed infections compared with single S. haematobium infections. They suggested that S. haematobium males were mating with S. mansoni females and deviating the eggs to the urinogenital tract, thereby reducing the amount of egg granulomas in liver tissues whilst increasing the egg output at the vesicle venous plexus and therefore aggravating urogenital schistosomiasis in co-infected individuals (Koukounari et al. Reference Koukounari, Donnelly, Sacko, Keita, Landoure, Dembele, Bosque-Oliva, Gabrielli, Gouvras, Traore, Fenwick and Webster2010; Gouvras et al. Reference Gouvras, Kariuki, Koukounari, Norton, Lange, Ireri, Fenwick, Mkoji and Webster2013). To date there has been no such morbidity surveys performed related to introgressed schistosomes within the S. haematobium group. Any Such differential morbidity in hybrid infections may have major implications for current methods of monitoring and evaluation of human morbidity levels and control programme efficacy.

Hybrid vigour is also a potential issue for successful disease control. As it has already been observed for hybrids between Leishmania major and Leishmania infantum, with hybrids having enhanced transmission potential and fitness (Volf et al. Reference Volf, Benkova, Myskova, Sadlova, Campino and Ravel2007), schistosome hybrids may exhibit heterosis. Laboratory experiments have shown that F1 and F2 hybrids between S. haematobium and S. guineensis exhibited greater infectivity for snail intermediate hosts and for hamsters, as well as an increased longevity, growth rate and reproductive potential (i.e. females produced more eggs and larger numbers of eggs were passed in hamster feces relative to single-species infections) (Southgate et al. Reference Southgate, Vanwijk and Wright1976; Wright and Southgate, Reference Wright, Southgate, Taylor and Muller1976; Webster and Southgate, Reference Webster and Southgate2003a ). Similar results were observed by Wright and Ross (Reference Wright and Ross1980) and Taylor (Reference Taylor1970) on F1 hybrids between S. haematobium males with S. mattheei females showing increased infectivity for snails and hamsters infected experimentally. Work has also been done on hybrid vigour in term of extended intermediate host range. Due to the potential inheritance of a snail infectivity factor by hybrid schistosomes, Schistosoma hybrids might be predicted to be able to break down the host specificity barrier and develop in both the intermediate snail hosts of the parental species, as it has already been observed. For example, Huyse et al. (Reference Huyse, Van Den Broeck, Hellemans, Volckaert and Polman2013) identified S. haematobium with S. bovis hybrids within both B. globosus and B. truncatus which are the intermediate snail hosts of S. haematobium and S. bovis respectively. In other experimental studies, hybrids of S. haematobium and S. guineensis were found to be able to infect both B. forskalii and B. truncatus (Southgate et al. Reference Southgate, Vanwijk and Wright1976; Wright and Southgate, Reference Wright, Southgate, Taylor and Muller1976; Wright and Ross, Reference Wright and Ross1980; Webster and Southgate, Reference Webster and Southgate2003a ), but also B. globosus and B. wrighti (Mutani et al. Reference Mutani, Christensen and Frandsen1985). And finally, hybrids of S. haematobium and S. mattheei have been shown to be able to develop in both B. globosus and B. forskalii (Wright, Reference Wright1974).

The excretory route of certain Schistosoma hybrids may also have substantial implications for their control. Hybrids between S. haematobium and S. guineensis are, for instance, predominantly passed with the host urine and not the feces, akin to pure S. haematobium. In humans, prevention of environmental contamination from urine might be harder to achieve relative to that from stool, and least in terms of human behavioural practices, and this could be of some importance in term of transmission where some level of local sanitation has been achieved (Southgate et al. Reference Southgate, Vanwijk and Wright1976).

Finally, in Cameroon it has been suggested that hybridization between S. haematobium and S. guineensis has caused disease outbreaks and that, rapidly after the establishment of S. haematobium, S. guineensis had been replaced by the hybrid and S. haematobium; S. haematobium and the hybrids offspring being more competitive than S. guineensis (Wright et al. Reference Wright, Southgate, Vanwijk and Moore1974; Southgate et al. Reference Southgate, Vanwijk and Wright1976, Reference Southgate, Rollinson, Ross and Knowles1982; Southgate, Reference Southgate1978; Tchuem Tchuenté et al. Reference Tchuem Tchuenté, Southgate, Njiokou, Njine, Kouemeni and Jourdane1997b ; Morand et al. Reference Morand, Southgate and Jourdane2002; Cosgrove and Southgate, Reference Cosgrove and Southgate2003a ; Webster and Southgate, Reference Webster and Southgate2003b ). Other studies have also observed competitive exclusion of one species by the other, S. mansoni males being more competitive than S. intercalatum and S. guineensis males at pairing with their respective females (Tchuem Tchuenté et al. Reference Tchuem Tchuenté, Imbertestablet, Delay and Jourdane1993, Reference Tchuem Tchuenté, Southgate, Imbertestablet and Jourdane1995, Reference Tchuem Tchuenté, Morand, Imbert-Establet, Delay and Jourdane1996; Cosgrove and Southgate, Reference Cosgrove and Southgate2003b ), S. haematobium being more competitive than S. mansoni males (Webster et al. Reference Webster, Southgate and Tchuem Tchuenté1999; Cunin et al. Reference Cunin, Tchuem Tchuenté, Poste, Djibrilla and Martin2003; Koukounari et al. Reference Koukounari, Donnelly, Sacko, Keita, Landoure, Dembele, Bosque-Oliva, Gabrielli, Gouvras, Traore, Fenwick and Webster2010; Gouvras et al. Reference Gouvras, Kariuki, Koukounari, Norton, Lange, Ireri, Fenwick, Mkoji and Webster2013) or than S. mattheei males (Southgate et al. Reference Southgate, Tchuem Tchuenté, Vercruysse and Jourdane1995), and S. rodhaini males over S. mansoni counterparts (Norton et al. Reference Norton, Webster, Kane and Rollinson2008b ). Hybrids may therefore be predicted to outcompete current single species as these inter-specific interactions would affect parasite establishment, growth, maturation, reproductive success and drug sensitivity (Norton et al. Reference Norton, Webster, Kane and Rollinson2008b ; Webster et al. Reference Webster, Gower and Norton2008).

CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVES

There is a gathering and convincing body of evidence for the natural hybridization between human and animal schistosome species. These raise a number of critical questions regarding evolution, epidemiology, health impact and ultimate control of schistosomiasis. The implications of hybrids in terms of human health remains unclear, but the emergence and spread of hybrid schistosomes, and in particular zoonotic hybrids, could prove problematic in terms of maintaining transmission in our current era of control/elimination, particularly if they can replace existing species and parasite strains, extend intermediate and definitive host ranges or present an increased infectivity and virulence. In term of future work, it is necessary to accurately identify these species. In particular, are the evolution and expansion of these hybrids a recent phenomenon, in response to new anthropogenic changes and pressures, or are they simply better detected now due to improvements in molecular diagnostics? This will allow us to understand the populations at risk and the transmission dynamics of infection with novel zoonotic hybrid schistosomes and will help to elucidate their role on host range, praziquantel efficacy, host morbidity and hence ultimately transmission potential, with a view to informing control programmes. This is especially important in today's era of ‘elimination of schistosomiasis as a public health problem’ implemented in the WHO roadmap (WHO, Reference World Health Organization2012) whereas schistosome zoonotic hybrids have the potential to become a global disease (De Laval et al. Reference De Laval, Savini, Biance-Valero and Simon2014; Boissier et al. Reference Boissier, Moné, Mitta, Dolores Bargues, Molyneux and Mas-Coma2015; Moné et al. Reference Moné, Holtfreter, Allienne, Mintsa-NguéMa, Ibikounlé, Boissier, Berry, Mitta, Richter and Mouahid2015; Berry et al. Reference Berry, Fillaux, Martin-Blondel, Boissier, Iriart, Marchou, Magnaval and Delobel2016). More generally, these research these questions could enhance our understanding of a wide spectrum of multi-host parasitic diseases of humans and animals, and in particular the role of hybridizations within major taxonomic groups in our rapidly changing world.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are extremely grateful to our research colleagues for many fruitful discussions on the topic of multi-host parasites in general. EL and JPW are members of the London Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease Research, a collaboration between the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, the Natural History Museum, the Royal Veterinary College, and Imperial College London.

FINANCIAL SUPPORT

The authors’ current research on this topic is funded by a ZELS research grant (combined BBSRC, MRC, ESRC, NERC, DSTL and DFID: BB/L018985/1-PI: J. P. W.).

References

REFERENCES

Aguilar, J. F., Rossello, J. A. and Feliner, G. N. (1999). Nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrDNA) concerted evolution in natural and artificial hybrids of Armeria (Plumbaginaceae). Molecular Ecology 8, 13411346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albaret, J. L., Picot, H., Diaw, O. T., Bayssadedufour, C., Vassiliades, G., Adamson, M., Luffau, G. and Chabaud, A. G. (1985). Investigations on schistosomes of man and livestock in Senegal with the aid of cercarial chaetotaxy – new arguments for the validity of Schistosome curassoni Brumpt, 1931, a parasite of man and domestic bovidae. Annales De Parasitologie Humaine Et Comparee 60, 417434.Google Scholar
Alonso, D., Munoz, J., Gascon, J., Valls, M. E. and Corachan, M. (2006). Short report: failure of standard treatment with praziquantel in two returned travelers with Schistosoma haematobium infection. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 74, 342344.Google Scholar
Alves, W. (1948). Observations on S. mattheei and S. haematobium – adults from experimental animals and man. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 41, 430431.Google Scholar
Añé, V. B., Añé, M. S., Abascal, H. F., Avila, J. P. and Viamonte, B. V. (1997). Infection caused by Schistosoma intercalatum and probable hybridization with Schistosoma haematobium in East Africa. A case report. Revista Cubana de Medicina Tropical 49, 215217.Google Scholar
Arnold, M. L. (2004). Natural hybridization and the evolution of domesticated, pest and disease organisms. Molecular Ecology 13, 9971007.Google Scholar
Baack, E. J. and Rieseberg, L. H. (2007). A genomic view of introgression and hybrid speciation. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 17, 513518.Google Scholar
Barré, N. and Uilenberg, G. (2010). Spread of parasites transported with their hosts: case study of two species of cattle tick. Revue Scientifique Et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties 29, 149160.Google Scholar
Barton, N. H. (2001). The role of hybridization in evolution. Molecular Ecology 10, 551568.Google Scholar
Basch, P. F. and Basch, N. (1984). Intergeneric reproductive stimulation and parthenogenesis in Schistosoma mansoni . Parasitology 89, 369376.Google Scholar
Berriman, M., Haas, B. J., Loverde, P. T., Wilson, R. A., Dillon, G. P., Cerqueira, G. C., Mashiyama, S. T., Al-Lazikani, B., Andrade, L. F., Ashton, P. D., Aslett, M. A., Bartholomeu, D. C., Blandin, G., Caffrey, C. R., Coghlan, A., Coulson, R., Day, T. A., Delcher, A., Demarco, R., Djikeng, A., Eyre, T., Gamble, J. A., Ghedin, E., Gu, Y., Hertz-Fowler, C., Hirai, H., Hirai, Y., Houston, R., Ivens, A., Johnston, D. A., Lacerda, D., Macedo, C. D., Mcveigh, P., Ning, Z. M., Oliveira, G., Overington, J. P., Parkhill, J., Pertea, M., Pierce, R. J., Protasio, A. V., Quail, M. A., Rajandream, M. A., Rogers, J., Sajid, M., Salzberg, S. L., Stanke, M., Tivey, A. R., White, O., Williams, D. L., Wortman, J., Wu, W. J., Zamanian, M., Zerlotini, A., Fraser-Liggett, C. M., Barrell, B. G. and El-Sayed, N. M. (2009). The genome of the blood fluke Schistosoma mansoni . Nature 460, 352–U365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berry, A., Fillaux, J., Martin-Blondel, G., Boissier, J., Iriart, X., Marchou, B., Magnaval, J. F. and Delobel, P. (2016). Evidence for a permanent presence of schistosomiasis in Corsica, France, 2015. Euro Surveillance 21, 30100.Google Scholar
Bjørneboe, A. and Frandsen, F. (1979). A comparison of the characteristics of two strains of Schistosoma intercalatum Fisher, 1934 in mice. Journal of Helminthology 53, 195203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boissier, J., Moné, H., Mitta, G., Dolores Bargues, M., Molyneux, D. and Mas-Coma, S. (2015). Schistosomiasis reaches Europe. Lancet Infectious Diseases 15, 757758.Google Scholar
Bonesso-Sabadini, P. I. P. and De Souza Dias, L. C. (2002). Altered response of strain of Schistosoma mansoni to oxamniquine and praziquantel. Memorias Do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 97, 381385.Google Scholar
Botros, S., Sayed, H., Amer, N., El-Ghannam, M., Bennett, J. L. and Day, T. A. (2005). Current status of sensitivity to praziquantel in a focus of potential drug resistance in Egypt. International Journal for Parasitology 35, 787791.Google Scholar
Brémond, P. (1990). Application des techniques électrophorétiques à deux aspects de la biologie des populations de schistosomes africains: caractérisation des parasites et de leurs hôtes intermédiaires; détection des schistosomes hybrides. In Actes de la Conférence Internationale sur la Situation Epidémiologique et les Stratégies de Lutte contre les Schistosomiases en Afrique de l'Ouest (ed. OCCGE), pp. 182189. Bobo Dioulasso, Niamey.Google Scholar
Brémond, P., Théron, A. and Rollinson, D. (1989). Hybrids between Schistosoma mansoni and S. rodhaini: characterization by isoelectric focusing of six enzymes. Parasitology Research 76, 138145.Google Scholar
Brémond, P., Mouchet, F., Chevallier, P., Sellin, E., Vera, C. and Sellin, B. (1990). Flux genique entre Schistosoma bovis et S. curassoni au Niger. Bulletin de la Société française de Parasitologie 8, 708.Google Scholar
Brémond, P., Sellin, B., Sellin, E., Naméoua, B., Labbo, R., Theron, A., and Combes, C. (1993). Arguments en faveur d'une modification du génome (introgression) du parasite humain Schistosoma haematobium par des gènes de S. bovis, au Niger. Comptes-Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences 316, 667670.Google Scholar
Burchard, G. D. and Kern, P. (1985). Probable hybridization between Schistosomiasis intercalatum and S. haematobium in Western Gabun. Tropical and Geographical Medicine 37, 119123.Google Scholar
Capron, A., Deblock, S., Biguet, J., Clay, A., Adenis, L. and Vernes, A. (1965). Contribution à l’étude expérimentale de la bilharziose à Schistosoma haematobium . Bulletin of the World Health Organization 32, 755–&.Google Scholar
Chevillon, C., De Garine-Wichatitsky, M., Barre, N., Ducornez, S. and De Meeus, T. (2013). Understanding the genetic, demographical and/or ecological processes at play in invasions: lessons from the southern cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae). Experimental and Applied Acarology 59, 203218.Google Scholar
Chunge, R., Katsivo, M., Kok, P., Wamwea, M. and Kinoti, S. (1986). Schistosoma bovis in human stools in Kenya. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 80, 849849.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cioli, D., Pica-Mattoccia, L. and Archer, S. (1993). Drug resistance in schistosomes. Parasitology Today 9, 162166.Google Scholar
Colley, D. G., Bustinduy, A. L., Secor, E. and King, C. H. (2014). Human schistosomiasis. Lancet 383, 22532264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cosgrove, C. L. and Southgate, V. R. (2002). Mating interactions between Schistosoma mansoni and S. margrebowiei . Parasitology 125, 233243.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, C. L. and Southgate, V. R. (2003 a). Competitive mating interactions between Schistosoma haematobium and S. intercalatum (Lower Guinea strain). Parasitology Research 89, 238241.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, C. L. and Southgate, V. R. (2003 b). Interactions between Schistosoma intercalatum (Zaire strain) and S. mansoni . Journal of Helminthology 77, 209218.Google Scholar
Cunin, P., Tchuem Tchuenté, L. A., Poste, B., Djibrilla, K. and Martin, P. M. V. (2003). Interactions between Schistosoma haematobium and Schistosoma mansoni in humans in north Cameroon. Tropical Medicine & International Health 8, 11101117.Google Scholar
De Bont, J. and Vercruysse, J. (1997). The epidemiology and control of cattle schistosomiasis. Parasitology Today 13, 255262.Google Scholar
De Bont, J. and Vercruysse, J. (1998). Schistosomiasis in cattle. Advances in Parasitology 41, 285364.Google Scholar
De Bont, J., Vercruysse, J., Southgate, V. R., Rollinson, D. and Kaukas, A. (1994). Cattle schistosomiasis in Zambia. Journal of Helminthology 68, 295299.Google Scholar
De Laval, F., Savini, H., Biance-Valero, E. and Simon, F. (2014). Human schistosomiasis: an emerging threat for Europe. Lancet 384, 10941095.Google Scholar
Detwiler, J. T. and Criscione, C. D. (2010). An infectious topic in reticulate evolution: introgression and hybridization in animal parasites. Genes 1, 102123.Google Scholar
Diaw, O. T., Vassiliades, G., Thiongane, Y., Seye, M., Sarr, Y. and Diouf, A. (1998). Extension des trématodoses du bétail apre's la construction des barrages dans le bassin du fleuve Sénégal. Revue d’élevage et de médecine vétérinaire des pays tropicaux 51, 113120.Google Scholar
Dover, G. A. (1986). Molecular drive in multigene families: how biological novelties arise, spread and are assimilated. Trends in Genetics 2, 159165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duplantier, J. M. and Sene, M. (2000). Rodents as reservoir hosts in the transmission of Schistosoma mansoni in Richard-Toll, Senegal, West Africa. Journal of Helminthology 74, 129135.Google Scholar
Fallon, P. G. and Doenhoff, M. J. (1994). Drug-resistant schistosomiasis: resistance to praziquantel and oxamniquine induced in Schistosoma mansoni in mice is drug specific. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 51, 8388.Google Scholar
Fan, P. C. and Lin, L. H. (2005). Hybridization of Schistosoma mansoni and Schistosoma japonicum in mice. The Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 36, 8996.Google Scholar
Fenwick, A. (1969). Baboons as reservoir hosts of Schistosoma mansoni. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 63, 5573010&.Google Scholar
Fenwick, A. and Webster, J. P. (2006). Schistosomiasis: challenges for control, treatment and drug resistance. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases 19, 577582.Google Scholar
Frandsen, F. (1978). Hybridization between different strains of Schistosoma intercalatum Fisher, 1934 from Cameroun and Zaïre. Journal of Helminthology 52, 1122.Google Scholar
Frisch, J. (1999). Towards a permanent solution for controlling cattle tick. International Journal for Parasitology 29, 5771.Google Scholar
Gouvras, A. N., Kariuki, C., Koukounari, A., Norton, A. J., Lange, C. N., Ireri, E., Fenwick, A., Mkoji, G. M. and Webster, J. P. (2013). The impact of single versus mixed Schistosoma haematobium and S. mansoni infections on morbidity profiles amongst school-children in Taveta, Kenya. Acta Tropica 128, 309317.Google Scholar
Grétillat, S. (1962). Une nouvelle zoonose, la “Bilharziose Ouest-Africaine” à Schistosoma curassoni Brumpt, 1931, commune à l'Homme et aux Ruminants domestiques. Comptes-Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences Paris 255, 18051807.Google Scholar
Hanelt, B., Mwangi, I. N., Kinuthia, J. M., Maina, G. M., Agola, L. E., Mutuku, M. W., Steinauer, M. L., Agwanda, B. R., Kigo, L., Mungai, B. N., Loker, E. S. and Mkoji, G. M. (2010). Schistosomes of small mammals from the Lake Victoria Basin, Kenya: new species, familiar species, and implications for schistosomiasis control. Parasitology 137, 11091118.Google Scholar
He, Y. X., Salafsky, B. and Ramaswamy, K. (2001). Host–parasite relationships of relationships Schistosoma japonicum in mammalian hosts. Trends in Parasitology 17, 320324.Google Scholar
Huyse, T., Webster, B. L., Geldof, S., Stothard, J. R., Diaw, O. T., Polman, K. and Rollinson, D. (2009). Bidirectional introgressive hybridization between a cattle and human schistosome species. PLoS Pathogens 5, e1000571.Google Scholar
Huyse, T., Van Den Broeck, F., Hellemans, B., Volckaert, F. A. M. and Polman, K. (2013). Hybridisation between the two major African schistosome species of humans. International Journal for Parasitology 43, 687689.Google Scholar
Imbert-Establet, D., Xia, M. and Jourdane, J. (1994). Parthenogenesis in the genus Schistosoma: electrophoretic evidence for this reproduction system in S. japonicum and S. mansoni . Parasitology Research 80, 186191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jourdane, J. and Southgate, V. R. (1992). Genetic exchanges and sexual interactions between species of the genus Schistosoma . Research and Reviews in Parasitology 52, 2126.Google Scholar
Kane, R. A., Bartley, J., Stothard, J. R., Vercruysse, J., Rollinson, D. and Southgate, V. R. (2002). Application of single strand conformational polymorphism (SSCP) analysis with fluorescent primers for differentiation of Schistosoma haematobium group species. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 96 (Suppl 1), S235S241.Google Scholar
Khalil, S. B. and Mansour, N. S. (1995). Worm development in hamsters infected with unisex and cross-mated Schistosoma mansoni and Schistosoma haematobium . Journal of Parasitology 81, 811.Google Scholar
King, K. C., Stelkens, R. B., Webster, J. P., Smith, D. F. and Brockhurst, M. A. (2015). Hybridization in parasites: consequences for adaptive evolution, pathogenesis and public health in a changing world. PLoS ONE 11, e1005098.Google Scholar
Kinoti, G. K. and Mumo, J. M. (1988). Spurious human infection with Schistosoma bovis . Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 82, 589590.Google Scholar
Koukounari, A., Donnelly, C. A., Sacko, M., Keita, A. D., Landoure, A., Dembele, R., Bosque-Oliva, E., Gabrielli, A. F., Gouvras, A., Traore, M., Fenwick, A. and Webster, J. P. (2010). The impact of single versus mixed schistosome species infections on liver, spleen and bladder morbidity within Malian children pre- and post-praziquantel treatment. BMC Infectious Diseases 10, 227240.Google Scholar
Kruatrachue, M., Upatham, E. S., Sahaphong, S., Tongthong, T. and Khunborivan, V. (1987). Scanning electron microscopic study of the tegumental surface of the hybrid schistosome between Schistosoma mekongi and S. japonicum-like (Malaysian). The Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 18, 453466.Google Scholar
Kruger, F. J. (1987). Enzyme electrophoresis of South African Schistosoma mattheei and S. haematobium . Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 54, 9396.Google ScholarPubMed
Kruger, F. J. (1988). Further observations on the electrophoretic characterization of South African Schistosoma mattheei and S. haematobium . Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 55, 6768.Google Scholar
Kruger, F. J. (1990). Frequency and possible consequences of hybridization between Schistosoma haematobium and S. mattheei in the Eastern Transvaal Lowveld. Journal of Helminthology 64, 333336.Google Scholar
Kruger, F. J. and Hamilton-Attwell, V. L. (1988). Scanning electron-microscope studies of miracidia suggest introgressive hybridization between Schistosoma haematobium and S haematobium × S mattheei in the Eastern Transvaal. Journal of Helminthology 62, 141147.Google Scholar
Kruger, F. J., Hamilton-Attwell, V. L. and Schutte, C. H. J. (1986 a). Scanning electron microscopy of the teguments of males from five populations of Schistosoma mattheei . Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 53, 109110.Google Scholar
Kruger, F. J., Schutte, C. H. J., Visser, P. S. and Evans, A. C. (1986 b). Phenotypic differences in Schistosoma mattheei ova from populations sympatric and allopatric to S. haematobium . Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 53, 103107.Google Scholar
Kruger, F. J. and Evans, A. C. (1990). Do all human urinary infections with Schistosoma mattheei Represent hybridization between S. haematobium and S. mattheei? Journal of Helminthology 64, 330332.Google Scholar
Lafferty, K. D. (2009). The ecology of climate change and infectious diseases. Ecology 90, 888900.Google Scholar
Lamberton, P. H. L., Hogan, S. C., Kabatereine, N. B., Fenwick, A. and Webster, J. P. (2010). In vitro Praziquantel test capable of detecting reduced In vivo efficacy in Schistosoma mansoni human infections. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 83, 13401347.Google Scholar
Lawton, S. P., Hirai, H., Ironside, J. E., Johnston, D. A. and Rollinson, D. (2011). Genomes and geography: genomic insights into the evolution and phylogeography of the genus Schistosoma . Parasites & Vectors 4, 131141.Google Scholar
Le Roux, P. L. (1954 a). Hybridisation of Schistosoma mansoni and S. rodhaini . Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 48, 34.Google Scholar
Le Roux, P. L. (1954 b). Schistosoma spp. recovered experimentally, through snails and mice and hamsters from a human subject of urinary schistosomiasis. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 48, 281281.Google Scholar
Léger, E., Vourc'h, G., Vial, L., Chevillon, C. and Mccoy, K. D. (2013). Changing distributions of ticks: causes and consequences. Experimental and Applied Acarology 59, 219244.Google Scholar
Lu, D. B., Wang, T.-P., Rudge, J. W., Donnelly, C. A., Fang, G.-R. and Webster, J. P. (2009). Evolution in a multi-host parasite: chronobiological circadian rhythm and population genetics of Schistosoma japonicum cercariae indicates contrasting definitive host reservoirs by habitat. International Journal for Parasitology 39, 15811588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, D. B., Rudge, J. W., Wang, T. P., Donnelly, C. A., Fang, G. R. and Webster, J. P. (2010 a). Transmission of Schistosoma japonicum in Marshland and Hilly regions of China: parasite population genetic and sibship structure. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 4, e781.Google Scholar
Lu, D. B., Wang, T.-P., Rudge, J. W., Donnelly, C. A., Fang, G.-R. and Webster, J. P. (2010 b). Contrasting reservoirs for Schistosoma japonicum between marshland and hilly regions in Anhui, China – a two-year longitudinal parasitological survey. Parasitology 137, 99110.Google Scholar
Lu, D. B., Wang, T. P., Rudge, J. W., Donnelly, C. A., Fang, G. R. and Webster, J. P. (2011). Genetic diversity of Schistosoma japonicum miracidia from individual rodent hosts. International Journal for Parasitology 41, 13711376.Google Scholar
Mas-Coma, S., Adela Valero, M. and Dolores Bargues, M. (2009). Climate change effects on trematodiases, with emphasis on zoonotic fascioliasis and schistosomiasis. Veterinary Parasitology 163, 264280.Google Scholar
Mbaye, A. D. (2013). Plan de gestion environnementale et sociale du Projet de restauration des fonctions socio- écologiques du lac de Guiers. Report number: Numéro de projet: P-SN-A00-004. Groupe de la Banque Africaine de developpment.Google Scholar
Melman, S. D., Steinauer, M. L., Cunningham, C., Kubatko, L. S., Mwangi, I. N., Wynn, N. B., Mutuku, M. W., Karanja, D. M. S., Colley, D. G., Black, C. L., Secor, W. E., Mkoji, G. M. and Loker, E. S. (2009). Reduced susceptibility to praziquantel among naturally occurring kenyan isolates of Schistosoma mansoni . PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 3, E504.Google Scholar
Meurs, L., Mbow, M., Vereecken, K., Menten, J., Mboup, S. and Polman, K. (2012). Epidemiology of mixed Schistosoma mansoni and Schistosoma haematobium infections in northern Senegal. International Journal for Parasitology 42, 305311.Google Scholar
Moné, H., Minguez, S., Ibikounle, M., Allienne, J.-F., Massougbodji, A. and Mouahid, G. (2012). Natural Interactions between S. haematobium and S. guineensis in the Republic of Benin. Scientific World Journal 2012, e793420.Google Scholar
Moné, H., Holtfreter, M. C., Allienne, J.-F. O., Mintsa-NguéMa, R., Ibikounlé, M., Boissier, J. R. M., Berry, A., Mitta, G., Richter, J. and Mouahid, G. (2015). Introgressive hybridizations of Schistosoma haematobium by Schistosoma bovis at the origin of the first case report of schistosomiasis in Corsica (France, Europe). Parasitology Research 114, 41274133.Google Scholar
Morand, S., Southgate, V. R. and Jourdane, J. (2002). A model to explain the replacement of Schistosoma intercalatum by Schistosoma haematobium and the hybrid S. intercalatum × S. haematobium in areas of sympatry. Parasitology 124, 401408.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. A. T., Dejong, R. J., Lwambo, N. J. S., Mungai, B. N., Mkoji, G. M. and Loker, E. S. (2003). First report of a natural hybrid between Schistosoma mansoni and S. rodhaini . Journal of Parasitology 89, 416418.Google Scholar
Mouchet, F., Develoux, M. and Magasa, M. B. (1988). Schistosoma bovis in human stools in Republic of Niger. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 82, 257257.Google Scholar
Muller-Graf, C. D. M., Collins, D. A., Packer, C. and Woolhouse, M. E. J. (1997). Schistosoma mansoni infection in a natural population of olive baboons (Papio cynocephalus anubis) in Gombe Stream National Park, Tanzania. Parasitology 115, 621627.Google Scholar
Mutani, A., Christensen, N. O. and Frandsen, F. (1985). A study of the biological characteristics of a hybrid line between male Schistosoma haematobium (Dar es Salaam, Tanzania) and female S. intercalatum (Edea, Cameroun). Acta Tropica 42, 319331.Google Scholar
N'goran, E. K., Diabate, S., Utzinger, J. and Sellin, B. (1997). Changes in human schistosomiasis levels after the construction of two large hydroelectric dams in central Cote d'Ivoire. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 75, 541545.Google Scholar
Nichols, G. L., Andersson, Y., Lindgren, E., Devaux, I. and Semenza, J. C. (2014). European monitoring systems and data for assessing environmental and climate impacts on human infectious diseases. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 11, 38943936.Google Scholar
Norton, A., Rollinson, D., Richards, L. and Webster, J. (2008 a). Simultaneous infection of Schistosoma mansoni and S. rodhaini in Biomphalaria glabrata: impact on chronobiology and cercarial behaviour. Parasites & Vectors 1, 4351.Google Scholar
Norton, A. J., Webster, J. P., Kane, R. A. and Rollinson, D. (2008 b). Inter-specific parasite competition: mixed infections of Schistosoma mansoni and S. rodhaini in the definitive host. Parasitology 135, 473484.Google Scholar
Pages, J. R. and Theron, A. (1990). Analysis and comparison of cercarial emergence rhythms of Schistosoma haematobium, S. intercalatum, S. bovis, and their hybrid progeny. International Journal for Parasitology 20, 193197.Google Scholar
Pages, J. R., Southgate, V. R., Tchuem Tchuenté, L. A. and Jourdane, J. (2001). Lack of prezygotic isolation by assortative mating between the two cryptic species of the polytypic Schistosoma intercalatum taxon. Parasitology Research 87, 888890.Google Scholar
Pages, J. R., Southgate, V. R., Tchuem Tchuenté, L. A. and Jourdane, J. (2002). Experimental evidence of hybrid breakdown between the two geographical strains of Schistosoma intercalatum . Parasitology 124, 169175.Google Scholar
Patz, J. A., Graczyk, T. K., Geller, N. and Vittor, A. Y. (2000). Effects of environmental change on emerging parasitic diseases. International Journal for Parasitology 30, 13951405.Google Scholar
Pica-Mattoccia, L., Doenhoff, M. J., Valle, C., Basso, A., Troiani, A. R., Liberti, P., Festucci, A., Guidi, A. and Cioli, D. (2009). Genetic analysis of decreased praziquantel sensitivity in a laboratory strain of Schistosoma mansoni . Acta Tropica 111, 8285.Google Scholar
Pitchford, R. J. (1959). Cattle schistosomiasis in man in the Eastern Transvaal. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 53, 285290.Google Scholar
Pitchford, R. J. (1961). Observations on a possible hybrid between the two schistosomes S. haematobium and S. mattheei . Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 55, 4451.Google Scholar
Pitchford, R. J. and Lewis, M. (1978). Oxamniquine in treatment of various schistosome infections in South-Africa. South African Medical Journal 53, 677680.Google Scholar
Raper, A. B. (1951). Schistosoma bovis infection in man. East African medical journal 28, 5054.Google Scholar
Ratard, R. C. and Greer, G. J. (1991). A new focus of Schistosoma haematobium Schistosoma intercalatum hybrid in Cameroon. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 45, 332338.Google Scholar
Ratard, R. C., Kouemeni, L. E., Bessala, M. M. E., Ndamkou, C. N., Greer, G. J., Spilsbury, J. and Cline, B. L. (1990). Human schistosomiasis in Cameroon. I. Distribution of schistosomiasis. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 42, 561572.Google Scholar
Rollinson, D. and Southgate, V. R. (1985). Schistosome and snail populations: genetic variability and parasite transmission. In Ecology and Genetics of Host-Parasite Interactions, Linnean Society Symposium Series (ed. Rollinson, D. and Anderson, R. M.), pp. 91109. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Rollinson, D., Vercruysse, J., Southgate, V. R., Mooreo, P. J., Ross, G. C., Walker, T. K. and Knowles, R. J. (1987). Observations on human and animal schistosomiasis in Senegal. In Helminth Zoonoses (ed. Geerts, S., Kumar, V. and Brandt, J.), pp. 119131. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Rollinson, D., Southgate, V. R., Vercruysse, J. and Moore, P. J. (1990 a). Observations on natural and experimental interactions between Schistosoma bovis and S. curassoni from West Africa. Acta Tropica 47, 101114.Google Scholar
Rollinson, D., Walker, T. K., Knowles, R. J. and Simpson, A. J. G. (1990 b). Identification of schistosome hybrids and larval parasites using rRNA probes. Systematic Parasitology 15, 6573.Google Scholar
Rudge, J. W., Lu, D. B., Fang, G. R., Wang, T. P., Basanez, M. G. and Webster, J. P. (2009). Parasite genetic differentiation by habitat type and host species: molecular epidemiology of Schistosoma japonicum in hilly and marshland areas of Anhui Province, China. Molecular Ecology 18, 21342147.Google Scholar
Rudge, J. W., Webster, J. P., Lu, D. B., Wang, T. P., Fang, G. R. and Basanez, M. G. (2013). Identifying host species driving transmission of schistosomiasis japonica, a multihost parasite system, in China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110, 1145711462.Google Scholar
Sang, T., Crawford, D. J. and Stuessy, T. F. (1995). Documentation of reticulate evolution in peonies (Paeonia) using internal transcribed spacer sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA: implications for biogeography and concerted evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 92, 68136817.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schistosoma japonicum Genome Sequencing and Functional Analysis Consortium (2009). The Schistosoma japonicum genome reveals features of host-parasite interplay. Nature 460, 345–U356.Google Scholar
Shuman, E. K. (2010). Global climate change and infectious diseases. New England Journal of Medicine 362, 10611063.Google Scholar
Slingenbergh, J., Gilbert, M., De Balogh, K. and Wint, W. (2004). Ecological sources of zoonotic diseases. Revue Scientifique Et Technique De L Office International Des Epizooties 23, 467484.Google Scholar
Southgate, V. R. (1978). On factors possibly restricting the distribution of Schistosoma intercalatum Fisher, 1934. Zeitschrift Fur Parasitenkunde-Parasitology Research 56, 183193.Google Scholar
Southgate, V. R., Vanwijk, H. B. and Wright, C. A. (1976). Schistosomiasis at Loum, Cameroun – Schistosoma haematobium, S. intercalatum and their natural hybrid. Zeitschrift Fur Parasitenkunde-Parasitology Research 49, 145159.Google Scholar
Southgate, V. R., Rollinson, D., Ross, G. C. and Knowles, R. J. (1982). Mating behaviour in mixed infections of Schistosoma haematobium and S. intercalatum . Journal of Natural History 16, 491496.Google Scholar
Southgate, V. R., Rollinson, D., Ross, G. C., Knowles, R. J. and Vercruysse, J. (1985). On Schistosoma curassoni, S. haematobium and S. bovis from Senegal: development in Mesocricetus auratus, compatibility with species of Bulinus and their enzymes. Journal of Natural History 19, 12491267.Google Scholar
Southgate, V. R., Tchuem Tchuenté, L. A., Vercruysse, J. and Jourdane, J. (1995). Mating behaviour in mixed infections of Schistosoma haematobium and S. mattheei . Parasitology Research 81, 651656.Google Scholar
Southgate, V. R., Jourdane, J. and Tchuem Tchuenté, L. A. (1998). Recent studies on the reproductive biology of the schistosomes and their relevance to speciation in the Digenea. International Journal for Parasitology 28, 11591172.Google Scholar
Steinauer, M. L., Hanelt, B., Mwangi, I. N., Maina, G. M., Agola, L. E., Kinuthia, J. M., Mutuku, M. W., Mungai, B. N., Wilson, W. D., Mkoji, G. M. and Loker, E. S. (2008). Introgressive hybridization of human and rodent schistosome parasites in western Kenya. Molecular Ecology 17, 50625074.Google Scholar
Steinmann, P., Keiser, J., Bos, R., Tanner, M. and Utzinger, J. (2006). Schistosomiasis and water resources development: systematic review, meta-analysis, and estimates of people at risk. Lancet Infectious Diseases 6, 411425.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. G. (1970). Hybridisation experiments on five species of African schistosomes. Journal of Helminthology 44, 253314.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. G. and Andrews, B. J. (1973). Comparison of the Infectivity and Pathogenicity of six species of African Schistosomes and their Hybrids 1. Mice and Hamsters. Journal of Helminthology 47, 439453.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. G., Amin, M. B. A. and Mbnelson, G. S. (1969). “Parthenogenesis” in Schistosoma mattheei . Journal of Helminthology 43, 197206.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. G., Nelson, G. S., Smith, M. and Andrews, B. J. (1973). Comparison of the Infectivity and Pathogenicity of six species of African Schistosomes and their Hybrids 2. Baboons. Journal of Helminthology 47, 455485.Google Scholar
Tchuem Tchuenté, L. A., Imbertestablet, D., Delay, B. and Jourdane, J. (1993). Choice of mate, a reproductive isolating mechanism between Schistosoma intercalatum and S. mansoni in mixed infections. International Journal for Parasitology 23, 179185.Google Scholar
Tchuem Tchuenté, L. A., Imbertestablet, D., Southgate, V. R. and Jourdane, J. (1994). Interspecific stimulation of parthenogenesis in Schistosoma intercalatum and S. mansoni . Journal of Helminthology 68, 167173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tchuem Tchuenté, L. A., Southgate, V. R., Imbertestablet, D. and Jourdane, J. (1995). Change of mate and mating competition between males of Schistosoma intercalatum and S. mansoni . Parasitology 110, 4552.Google Scholar
Tchuem Tchuenté, L. A., Morand, S., Imbert-Establet, D., Delay, B. and Jourdane, J. (1996). Competitive exclusion in human schistosomes: the restricted distribution of Schistosoma intercalatum . Parasitology 113, 129136.Google Scholar
Tchuem Tchuenté, L. A., Southgate, V. R., Jourdane, J., Kaukas, A. and Vercruysse, J. (1997 a). Hybridisation between the digeneans Schistosoma haematobium and S. mattheei: Viability of hybrids and their development in sheep. Systematic Parasitology 36, 123131.Google Scholar
Tchuem Tchuenté, L. A., Southgate, V. R., Njiokou, F., Njine, T., Kouemeni, L. E. and Jourdane, J. (1997 b). The evolution of schistosomiasis at Loum, Cameroon: replacement of Schistosoma intercalatum by S. haematobium through introgressive hybridization. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 91, 664665.Google Scholar
Teesdale, C. H. (1976). Spurious human infections with Schistosoma bovis . Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 70, 165165.Google Scholar
Théron, A. (1989). Hybrids between Schistosoma mansoni and S. rodhaini: characterization by cercarial emergence rhythms. Parasitology 99, 225228.Google Scholar
Théron, A. and Pointier, J. P. (1995). Ecology, dynamics, genetics and divergence of trematode populations in heterogeneous environments: the model of Schistosoma mansoni in the insular focus of Guadeloupe. Research and Reviews in Parasitology 55, 4964.Google Scholar
Théron, A., Pointier, J. P., Morand, S., Imbertestablet, D. and Borel, G. (1992). Long-term dynamics of natural-populations of Schistosoma mansoni among Rattus rattus in patchy environment. Parasitology 104, 291298.Google Scholar
Valentim, C. L. L., Cioli, D., Chevalier, F. D., Cao, X., Taylor, A. B., Holloway, S. P., Pica-Mattoccia, L., Guidi, A., Basso, A., Tsai, I. J., Berriman, M., Carvalho-Queiroz, C., Almeida, M., Aguilar, H., Frantz, D. E., Hart, P. J., Loverde, P. T. and Anderson, T. J. C. (2013). Genetic and molecular basis of drug resistance and species-specific drug action in schistosome parasites. Science 342, 13851389.Google Scholar
Vercruysse, J., Southgate, V. R. and Rollinson, D. (1984). Schistosoma curassoni Brumpt, 1931 in sheep and goats in Senegal. Journal of Natural History 18, 969976.Google Scholar
Vercruysse, J., Southgate, V. R., Rollinson, D., Declercq, D., Sacko, M., Debont, J. and Mungomba, L. M. (1994). Studies on transmission and schistosome interactions in Senegal, Mali and Zambia. Tropical and Geographical Medicine 46, 220226.Google Scholar
Vogel, H. (1941). Über den Einfluss des Geschlechts-Partners auf Wachstum und Entwicklung bei Bilharzia mansoni und Kreuzpaarungen zwischen verschiedenen Bilharzia-Aiten. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie und Parasitenkunde 148, 7896.Google Scholar
Vogel, H. (1942). Über die Nachkommenschaft aus Kreuzpaarungen zwischen Bilharzia mansoni und B. japonica . Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie und Parasitenkunde 149, 319333.Google Scholar
Volf, P., Benkova, I., Myskova, J., Sadlova, J., Campino, L. and Ravel, C. (2007). Increased transmission potential of Leishmania major/Leishmania infantum hybrids. International Journal for Parasitology 37, 589593.Google Scholar
Webster, B. L. and Southgate, V. R. (2003 a). Compatibility of Schistosoma haematobium, S. intercalatum and their hybrids with Bulinus truncatus and B. forskalii . Parasitology 127, 231242.Google Scholar
Webster, B. L. and Southgate, V. R. (2003 b). Mating interactions of Schistosoma haematobium and S. intercalatum with their hybrid offspring. Parasitology 126, 327338.Google Scholar
Webster, B. L., Southgate, V. R. and Tchuem Tchuenté, L. A. (1999). Mating interactions between Schistosoma haematobium and S. mansoni . Journal of Helminthology 73, 351356.Google Scholar
Webster, B. L., Southgate, V. R. and Tchuem Tchuenté, L. A. (2003). Isoenzyme analysis of Schistosoma haematobium, S. intercalatum and their hybrids and occurrences of natural hybridization in Cameroon. Journal of Helminthology 77, 269274.Google Scholar
Webster, B. L., Tchuem Tchuenté, L. A., Jourdane, J. and Southgate, V. R. (2005). The interaction of Schistosoma haematobium and S. guineensis in Cameroon. Journal of Helminthology 79, 193197.Google Scholar
Webster, B. L., Southgate, V. R. and Littlewood, D. T. J. (2006). A revision of the interrelationships of Schistosoma including the recently described Schistosoma guineensis . International Journal for Parasitology 36, 947955.Google Scholar
Webster, B. L., Tchuem Tchuenté, L. A. and Southgate, V. R. (2007). A single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) approach for investigating genetic interactions of Schistosoma haematobium and Schistosoma guineensis in Loum, Cameroon. Parasitology Research 100, 739745.Google Scholar
Webster, J. P., Gower, C. M. and Norton, A. J. (2008). Evolutionary concepts in predicting and evaluating the impact of mass chemotherapy schistosomiasis control programmes on parasites and their hosts. Evolutionary Applications 1, 6683.Google Scholar
Webster, B. L., Rollinson, D., Stothard, J. R. and Huyse, T. (2010 a). Rapid diagnostic multiplex PCR (RD-PCR) to discriminate Schistosoma haematobium and S. bovis . Journal of Helminthology 84, 107114.Google Scholar
Webster, J. P., Oliviera, G., Rollinson, D. and Gower, C. M. (2010 b). Schistosome genomes: a wealth of information. Trends in Parasitology 26, 103106.Google Scholar
Webster, B. L., Diaw, O. T., Seye, M. M., Faye, D. S., Stothard, J. R., Sousa-Figueiredo, J. C. and Rollinson, D. (2013 a). Praziquantel treatment of school children from single and mixed infection foci of intestinal and urogenital schistosomiasis along the Senegal River Basin: monitoring treatment success and re-infection patterns. Acta Tropica 128, 292302.Google Scholar
Webster, B. L., Diaw, O. T., Seye, M. M., Webster, J. P. and Rollinson, D. (2013 b). Introgressive hybridization of Schistosoma haematobium group species in Senegal: species barrier break down between ruminant and human schistosomes. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 7, doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002110.Google Scholar
Webster, J. P., Molyneux, D. H., Hotez, P. J. and Fenwick, A. (2014). The contribution of mass drug administration to global health: past, present and future. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B – Biological Sciences 369, 20130434.Google Scholar
Webster, J. P., Gower, C. M., Knowles, S., Molyneux, D. M. and Fenton, A. (2016). One Health – an Ecological and Evolutionary Framework for tackling Neglected Zoonotic Diseases. Evolutionary Applications 9, 313333.Google Scholar
World Health Organization, (2012). Accelerating work to overcome the global impact of Neglected Tropical Diseases. WHO roadmap for implementation. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Wright, C. A. (1974). Snail susceptibility or trematode infectivity? Journal of Natural History 8, 545548.Google Scholar
Wright, C. A. and Ross, G. C. (1980). Hybrids between Schistosoma haematobium and S. mattheei and their identification by isoelectric focusing of enzymes. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 74, 326332.Google Scholar
Wright, C. A. and Southgate, V. R. (1976). Hybridization of schistosomes and some of its implications. In Genetic Aspects of Host–Parasite Relationships, 14th Symposium of the British Society for Parasitology (ed. Taylor, A. E. R. and Muller, R.), pp. 5586. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.Google Scholar
Wright, C. A., Southgate, V. R., Vanwijk, H. B. and Moore, P. J. (1974). Hybrids between Schistosoma haematobium and Schistosoma intercalatum in Cameroon. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 68, 413414.Google Scholar
Young, N. D., Jex, A. R., Li, B., Liu, S. P., Yang, L. F., Xiong, Z. J., Li, Y. R., Cantacessi, C., Hall, R. S., Xu, X., Chen, F. Y., Wu, X., Zerlotini, A., Oliveira, G., Hofmann, A., Zhang, G. J., Fang, X. D., Kang, Y., Campbell, B. E., Loukas, A., Ranganathan, S., Rollinson, D., Rinaldi, G., Brindley, P. J., Yang, H. M., Wang, J., Wang, J. and Gasser, R. B. (2012). Whole-genome sequence of Schistosoma haematobium . Nature Genetics 44, 221225.Google Scholar
Zwingenberger, K., Feldmeier, H., Bienzle, U. and Steiner, A. (1990). Mixed Schistosoma haematobium Schistosoma intercalatum infection. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 84, 8587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Schematic phylogeny of the interrelationships of members of the Schistosoma genus and their principal vertebrate hosts (only indicated for the main schistosome species in term of human and veterinary health) (adapted from Lawton et al. (2011) and Webster et al. (2006)).

Figure 1

Table 1. Reports of potential natural hybridizations

Figure 2

Table 2. Reports of experimental hybridizations

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Schematic of causes and consequences of schistosome hybridization. The circumstances producing increased opportunity for hybridization are intensification of drug administration, agricultural practices and land use and modifications of environment due to human activities. This will then modify the ecology of both schistosomes’ intermediate and definitive host but also biology of the parasites. We outline what we think would be the most important and/or potentially dangerous effects of hybridization: an increase in transmission potential and morbidity and an altered response to drug therapy.