No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
The Bunter and Keuper formations of the Trias are very fully developed in the country around Liverpool, and leaving out of consideration the Red Marl, both of these formations seem to be thicker there than anywhere else in Great Britain. The object of this paper is to give a few notes recording the thickness of the Trias, the structure of the various sandstones of which it is composed, and the character of the included pebbles, many of which are of local derivation.
Read at the British Association, Leeds, September, 1890.
page 499 note 1 The formation of crystals on grains of quartz in sandstone was first described by ProfBonney, T. G., F.R.S., in Q J.G.S. vol. xxxv. p. 666.Google Scholar
page 500 note 1 “Iron as a Colouring Matter of Rocks,”by Tate, A. Norman, F.C.S., Proc. Liverpool Geol. Soc. vol. v. p. 284.Google Scholar
page 501 note 1 An Upper Silurian fossil, Platyschisma, was found at Eastham.
page 501 note 2 A similar pebble in exactly the same condition was found in the Keuper at Wallasey
page 502 note 1 “Triassic and Permian of the Midland Counties,” p. 60 (1869)Google Scholar.
page 503 note 1 Geol. Mag. Dec. II. Vol. VII. p. 404 (1880)Google Scholar, and Vol. X. p. 199 (1883).
page 503 note 2 Proc. Birmingham Phil. Soc. vol. iii. p. 157 (1882)Google Scholar.
page 503 note 3 “Pebbles in the Bunter Sandstone,” Geol. Mag. Dec. II. Vol. X. p. 285 (1883)Google Scholar.
page 503 note 4 “Geology of Cheshire,” Journ. Iron and Steel Inst. p. 352 (1884)Google Scholar.
Please note a has been issued for this article.