Tables 2 and 4 of the article by Mougeon, Nadasdi and Rehner (2005) included several errors in the calculation of the percentages. The corrected tables are provided below. The authors apologize for the errors.
Table 2. Distribution of innovations and their traditional counterparts across communities and speaker groups.
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary-alt:20160921030440-50262-mediumThumb-S1366728913000680_tab1.jpg?pub-status=live)
* Word in italics = innovation; word in Roman = variant; X = NP referring to a game or sport
Table 4. Implicational distribution of innovations across communities and speaker groups.
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary-alt:20160921030440-16703-mediumThumb-S1366728913000680_tab2.jpg?pub-status=live)
X = NP referring to a game or sport