Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T01:28:39.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The economic importance and mobility of horses in the Roman Netherlands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2025

Maaike Groot
Affiliation:
Institut für Prähistorische Archäologie, Freie Universität Berlin
Claudia Gerling
Affiliation:
Department Environmental Science, Integrative Prehistory and Archaeological Science (IPAS), University of Basel
Alistair W. G. Pike
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Southampton
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previous research has suggested that horse breeding, with the army as the intended buyer, was an important part of the local agrarian economy in the Roman Dutch eastern river area. Since it is very difficult to trace the origins of horses by traditional archaeozoological methods, strontium isotope analysis was used to investigate the origins of horses in both military and rural sites. These new data are integrated with data on horse frequencies and size to assess the economic importance of horses in rural communities in the eastern river area and further investigate possible supply networks. Both horse frequencies and horse size increase from the Early Roman period onwards, reflecting the significant economic importance of horses in this region. The laser ablation 87Sr/86Sr ratios show evidence for mobility in military horses but not in rural horses.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

The Roman conquest of the southern half of the Netherlands had a major impact on the agricultural economy of the area. Not only did the soldiers stationed in the army camps along the river Rhine and in Nijmegen need to be supplied with food and other essentials, but the start of urbanization had a further effect on the local economy. Administrators, craftsmen, and traders did not produce their own food, or did so only to a limited extent. Requisitioning by the army, production for the free market, and taxation were all stimulants encouraging the local farmers to produce more than they needed. The presence of imported goods in rural sites indicates that this was not just one-way traffic.

The central part of the Netherlands is one of the best-known areas archaeologically in the Roman provinces. Decades of developer-funded and research-driven excavations have yielded a large quantity of data, including archaeozoological data. Changes observed in animal husbandry can be connected to a shift from a subsistence to a surplus-producing system.Footnote 1 One striking characteristic of the eastern river area (in the central Netherlands) is the prominence of horses at many rural settlements in the Middle Roman period.Footnote 2 While some consumption of horsemeat took place in rural settlements,Footnote 3 different fragmentation and butchery patterns in comparison to cattle suggest that horses were not kept primarily for their meat.Footnote 4 Furthermore, horse bones show a decrease in the proportion of butchery marks during the Roman period – with the biggest decrease occurring in the Early Roman period – suggesting that consumption of horsemeat declined in importance.Footnote 5 High proportions of horse can thus not be explained by an increase in horsemeat consumption. The prominence of horse has instead led to the hypothesis that horses were bred in this region as an agricultural surplus, presumably with the army as the target market.Footnote 6 While this hypothesis makes sense in many ways – for example, it explains the high proportion of horse fragments and suits the local landscape – it is difficult to prove that horses bred in the Dutch eastern river area actually ended up with the Roman army.

A second hypothesis is derived from the increase in the withers height of horses that can be observed for the Dutch eastern river area during the Roman period.Footnote 7 It is assumed that this increase is a result of deliberate breeding of local horses with larger, imported horses.Footnote 8 Some horses received special treatment by being buried in rural settlements or cemeteries;Footnote 9 one explanation for this is that the horses were regarded as special because they were imported animals used in breeding programs to increase the size of the local horses.

Both hypotheses (horse breeding for the Roman army and import of large horses with subsequent interbreeding with local stock) are difficult to prove by traditional archaeozoological methods. Strontium isotope analysis can provide insight into the movement of horses, whether they were imported into rural settlements or sold to the army. This article will present new strontium isotope data from horse teeth and review data on horse frequencies and horse size to achieve an integrated perspective on horses in the limes region of the Roman Netherlands.

Research questions and background

This article will address the following questions: What developments in horse frequencies occurred during the Roman period? Do horses in the Roman Netherlands show any developments in size? Is there any evidence for mobility of military and rural horses? The article will focus on the area directly south of the river Rhine, from the Late Iron Age to the Late Roman period (Fig. 1). The so-called eastern river area, or the eastern part of the central Netherlands, coincides with the administrative unit of the civitas Batavorum.

Fig. 1. Map of the Netherlands showing the research area and the sites from which the horse teeth sampled for strontium isotope analysis came. (Map by Maaike Groot.)

Strontium isotope analysis

Stable and radiogenic isotope analyses of tooth enamel can provide valuable insights into the origins and movements of animals.Footnote 10 The ratio of 87Sr/86Sr varies between different rocks and sediments.Footnote 11 This variation is directly reflected in the vegetation that is consumed by animals. Dietary Sr dominates skeletal-tissue 87Sr/86Sr, rather than drinking water or atmospheric contributions as suggested by recent studies,Footnote 12 thus the body tissues of animals will have a similar ratio to the food consumed. After burial, however, bone and dentine will slowly take on the ratio of the local soil, while tooth enamel is not affected by diagenesis and will retain the signal of the source region of the food consumed during the formation of the tooth enamel, which will usually be the region where the animal lived.Footnote 13 By comparing 87Sr/86Sr ratios of tooth enamel to known ratios of bioavailable strontium for the archaeological location where the animal was found, it is possible to identify non-local animals and establish a range of possible origins.Footnote 14 For the Netherlands, a map showing the different isoscapes with their bioavailable strontium values provides an essential tool for establishing whether animals can be regarded as compatible with the local bioavailable strontium isotope range.Footnote 15 Research into animal mobility in the Netherlands is not yet well established, but a few studies are available.Footnote 16

Horses in the Roman army and the role of the Batavians

The training of horses in the Roman army is likely to have started when the animals were three years old.Footnote 17 According to Varro, horses should first be mounted when they are three years old; Virgil also states that horses can be ridden and taught the basics at that age.Footnote 18 At the military camp in Hod Hill, Dorset, shed milk teeth of horses have been found, indicating that horses younger than five years old were used by the army.Footnote 19

While large size was admired in horses in Roman times, short stocky horses are likely to have been preferred due to their smooth ride.Footnote 20 A size increase could be accomplished by improved nutrition for young horses, since the amount and quality of food influences adult size.Footnote 21 It could also be achieved by interbreeding local stock with larger, imported horses. Hyland mentions the importation of 20 horses from Italy to Gaul in 170 BCE.Footnote 22

The army used various ways to acquire horses, including requisitioning, taxation and tribute, purchasing, breeding in imperial or army stud farms, and the capture of enemy horses.Footnote 23 Auxiliary cavalry units recruited in the provinces would come with their own indigenous horses, but, over time, these would need to be replaced by horses from the region where the unit was stationed.Footnote 24 Trade in horses crossed provincial borders; in northern regions, indigenous ponies were used as pack animals.Footnote 25 There was no standard military horse, but every horse had to pass a trial period and a veterinary exam.Footnote 26

The army in the civitas Batavorum would have needed around 400 horses per year.Footnote 27 Acquisition of local horses through requisitioning, purchase, taxation, or recruiting together with their riders is likely to have accounted for many of these. The suitability of the river landscape for livestock raising, the high proportion of horse bones in rural settlements, and the close ties between the Batavians and the Roman army are arguments in favor of local horse breeding supplying the army.Footnote 28 The Batavians were known for their horsemanship; they supplied qualified horsemen for the imperial bodyguard and for the ala Batavorum.Footnote 29 Veterans from the Roman army, having returned to their home villages, may have played a pivotal role in horse breeding.Footnote 30

Little attention has been paid to the presence of horse-donkey hybrids in the Netherlands. There are no finds of donkey from the Roman Netherlands. The damp climate is not very suitable for donkeys, and the breeding of mules or hinnies seems unlikely for this region.Footnote 31 Johnstone's biometric method of identifying horses, mules, and donkeys did not result in any definite identifications of mules or donkeys for the three sites in the Netherlands that were included in her study but did find some probable identifications of mules.Footnote 32 However, a recent archaeogenetic study has cast doubt on morphometric identifications of mules. This study analyzed DNA from 31 equids from Roman Switzerland, including 17 that had previously been identified as mules.Footnote 33 The results showed that the presence of mules has been overestimated and that morphological and biometrical identification of mules is unreliable. An earlier study had already cast doubt on the criteria, based on differences in dental morphology, used to identify equids, due to the large intraspecific variability.Footnote 34 Using the same methods as the Swiss study but a much larger dataset, mules were found to be relatively common in northern France (20% in the 1st c. CE, 25–34% in the 2nd c. CE, and 13% in the first half of the 3rd c. CE).Footnote 35 While donkeys were almost absent, mule breeding was not excluded by the authors because few male donkeys are needed. Another study focused on the limes region of Raetia, Noricum, Upper Pannonia – southern Germany, eastern Switzerland and Austria – examined 295 equids: 83% were identified as horse, 1% as donkey, and 16% as mules.Footnote 36

Besides aDNA analyses, which can be expensive and are not always successful, another way to reliably identify equid species is ZooMS – collagen peptide mass fingerprinting. A recent study was able to identify horse and donkey, and the authors believe that mules should also be identifiable by ZooMS.Footnote 37 New methods for morphological identification have been developed in recent years,Footnote 38 but neither these nor ZooMS or genetic analysis have been applied to equid remains from the Netherlands. The equid remains included in the study by Granado and colleagues derive from urban and military contexts in a region much closer to the heart of the Roman Empire than the region that is the focus of the current study, while the samples in the study by Sharif et al. are nearly all from military contexts. If mules are already much less common than has previously been assumed in Germania Superior, Raetia, Noricum, and Upper Pannonia, then for the rural sites of the central Netherlands they can be expected to be even rarer. It cannot be excluded that some of the equids found in military and urban sites in the Netherlands are hybrids, but it seems far more likely that they are horses. Mules may have been used as pack animals and to draw light wagons, while cattle were used for heavier loads and ploughing. It is assumed that horses, on the other hand, were mainly or exclusively used for riding.

Material and methods

Five individual horses from both rural and military contexts were selected for strontium isotope analysis (Table 1; Fig. 1). The two rural sites included in this study (Tiel-Passewaaijse Hogeweg and Geldermalsen-Hondsgemet) are typical indigenous settlements. Both have high proportions of horse fragments in the Middle Roman period and are assumed to have bred horses as a surplus.Footnote 39 The original plan was to select only horse burials, but for some of the selected animals, the remains could not be found in the provincial archaeological depot. Therefore, in one case, an isolated third molar from Tiel-Passewaaijse Hogeweg was used. For Geldermalsen-Hondsgemet, the only horse burial was of a very young animal which did not yet have third molars; therefore, a tooth from a special deposit of a horse skull was used instead. The selection of horses from military sites was largely determined by availability. Horse remains are much less abundant in military sites than in rural sites. Furthermore, the number of military sites in the Dutch eastern river area for which well-dated animal bone assemblages have been analyzed is small. Kesteren-Prinsenhof is a horse cemetery dating to the later part of the Early Roman and the early part of the Middle Roman period.Footnote 40 Two horses from this site are included in the study. The five horses are all roughly contemporary and date to the later part of the Early Roman period and the early part of the Middle Roman period (40–140 CE).

Table 1. Information on the horse teeth selected for strontium isotope analysis and the mean, minimum, and maximum 87Sr/86Sr values, as well as the range.

Samples were taken from four third lower molars and one third upper molar and prepared for laser ablation by Claudia Gerling at IPNA, University of Basel. The samples were run at the University of Southampton by Alistair Pike. Enamel slices approximately 1–2 mm thick were removed from animal tooth specimens parallel to the growth axis of the tooth using a diamond-tipped cutting disc and a Dremel tool, then ultrasonicated in Milli-Q water, and subsequently dried in a vacuum oven. The slices were mounted in epoxy resin and manually polished using 220, 800, and 1200 grit papers. Strontium isotopic analysis was performed on a Thermo Scientific Neptune multi collector ICP-MS with a solid state homogenized-beam 213 nm laser (NewWave NWR213), using the oxide reduction technique of De Jong.Footnote 41 87Sr/86Sr data were collected with an integration time of 1.14 seconds per measurement cycle. Krypton introduced as an impurity present in the helium carrier gas source was corrected for by carrying out an on-peak gas blank, and the 87Sr/86Sr value was corrected for the 87Rb interference using the natural 87Rb /85Rb ratio of 0.385617. Instrumental mass fractionation was corrected for using an exponential fractionation law and the natural 86Sr/88Sr ratio of 0.1194.Footnote 42

Laser tracks were positioned close to the center of the enamel section to avoid contamination or the effects of diagenesis at the surface of the tooth. A pre-ablation pass of the laser was performed to remove any remaining contamination from the sample cutting. Time series of strontium isotopes are obtained as continuous data by moving the tooth along the growth axis of the enamel (at 15μms-1) as the laser pulses with a repetition rate of 20 Hz and spot size 110 μm. Repeat analysis of an in-house pig tooth standard, bracketing the analyses of the horse teeth, showed a mean offset of +110 ± 74 ppm (1 SE) for the laser ablation analyses over TIMS values, which is similar to values reported by other laboratories using a similar methodology.Footnote 43 This is within the precision of individual measurements of 100–600 ppm and is therefore considered insignificant to our interpretation of the isotopes.

Third lower molar enamel in horses is mineralized between 21 (±3) and 55 (±2) months; maxillary teeth are believed to have similar mineralization timing.Footnote 44 The isotopic composition of tooth enamel is fixed after mineralization ends. Thus, strontium isotope analysis by either laser ablation or sequential sampling can capture a period of nearly three years in a horse's life, but only if the tooth is unworn or only lightly worn. Two complications should be borne in mind when interpreting the results. First, enamel is not mineralized in horizontal layers but subvertically, which means that samples taken as horizontal slices of tooth enamel reflect isotope values recorded in enamel over a period of several months.Footnote 45 This effect is somewhat mitigated by using a small laser spot size (110 μm) that produces a crater a few microns deep, so that while some averaging effect will remain, it will be substantially reduced. Second, the growth of horse teeth is not constant, but takes place at an exponentially decreasing rate.Footnote 46 This means that the total tooth length cannot simply be divided into sections representing equal time periods. Bendrey and colleagues developed a model to account for this exponentially decreasing growth rate.Footnote 47 In this paper, since we are not concerned with seasonal changes, we will not use their model but will instead take into account the exponentially decreasing growth rate when relating any changes in strontium values to a specific age.

Horse frequencies were calculated for each archaeological site based on the total number of identified specimens for cattle, sheep/goat, pig, and horse, the main livestock species. Site type was taken into account, distinguishing between rural and consumer sites: the latter include towns, vici, and military sites but exclude temples. Nearly all rural sites are small indigenous settlements, consisting of one to five farmhouses; the few exceptions are settlements with a larger, villa-like building (Druten-Klepperhei and Ewijk-Keizershoeve).

Standard periods were used to investigate chronological trends: Late Iron Age (250–12 BCE); Early Roman period (12 BCE–70 CE); Middle Roman period (70–270 CE); and Late Roman period (270–450 CE).Footnote 48 Overlapping periods were included when they added information. Many rural sites in the eastern river area have a transitional date, covering the Early Roman period and the early part of the Middle Roman period.

To investigate changes in horse size, the log size index (LSI) method was used.Footnote 49 This method calculates the decimal log of the ratio between a measurement and a standard value. The main advantage is that it allows plotting different measurements on the same scale, thus increasing sample size. The standard is composed of the means of measurements for a series of 10th-c. horse burials from Iceland.Footnote 50 Previously, horse size was investigated based on reconstructed withers height,Footnote 51 which limits the sample size and does not take into account changes in the robusticity of horses.

Only measurements taken on fused bones were used, although for published data, this is not always explicitly mentioned. All measurements on the scapula and the smallest breadth of the diaphysis of long bones were excluded, as they are strongly affected by post-fusion growth. Some postcranial measurements that may continue growing post-fusion in sheep and pig were included,Footnote 52 since excluding them would have limited the data set too much. The measurements that were used are listed in Table 2. Only one measurement per bone per dimension (anatomical plane) was included.

Table 2. Measurements included in the LSI analysis. Bd: distal breadth; BT: breadth of the trochlea; GL: greatest length; BFp: breadth of the proximal articular surface; BFd: breadth of the distal articular surface; Dp: proximal depth; LA: length of the acetabulum; LAR: length of the acetabulum on the rim; Dd: distal depth; GB: greatest breadth; LmT: length of the medial part of the trochlea tali.

Length measurements provide information on the height of an animal, while width and depth measurements provide information on robustness. Tooth size is generally more conservative than the size of post-cranial bones, so that rapid changes in tooth size are likely to indicate a change in genetic material and not just a change in husbandry. Width, length and depth measurements were analyzed separately, as recommended by Davis,Footnote 53 since measurements on the same anatomical plane are correlated more strongly than those between anatomical planes. Unfortunately, tooth measurements were not available.

The Mann-Whitney pairwise test was used (software: PAST 3) to determine statistical significance between different groups of logs; a p-value of less than 0.05 is seen as statistically significant.

Results

Strontium isotope analysis

Figure 2 shows the results of the strontium isotope analysis by laser ablation. Each tooth roughly reflects the period between 2 and 4.5 years of age. The three rural horses show no evidence of mobility; their values fall within the 87Sr/86Sr range for the river area.Footnote 54

Fig. 2. 87Sr/86Sr laser ablation MC-ICP-MS data for third lower molars from five horses from rural and military sites in the Dutch eastern river area. Individual measurements are shown in grey, with the darker line representing a 10-point moving average. (Figure by the authors.)

The minor fluctuations in 87Sr/86Sr values may be methodological or may reflect the use of different pastures. The female military horse is mostly consistent with the local strontium signature but shows higher values about halfway down the tooth. Perhaps this horse spent a brief time (a few months) in another location, outside the river area. Values between 0.7095 and 0.710 can be found in sandy regions directly adjacent to the eastern river area, both to the north and to the south.Footnote 55 The male military horse shows values consistent with the local strontium signature during the later part of tooth formation. During the early part, however, it has values that far exceed the local signature and actually point to different locations. In the early-formed part of the tooth, three distinct levels can be recognized (above 0.713, just above 0.712, and 0.711), before the values drop down to values found in the river area. In this region of the tooth, there is no correlation between Sr concentration and 87Sr/86Sr isotopic value (R2=0.108), suggesting diagenesis is not an issue. The two highest values are not known for the Netherlands, although the isoscape map by Kootker and colleagues has some gaps where high values may be expected, such as in the boulder clay area in the northeast of the Netherlands.Footnote 56

Horse frequencies

Figure 3 shows horse proportions for rural and consumer sites in the eastern river area. Clearly visible is the rise in the proportion of horse fragments in rural sites from a mean of 8% in the Late Iron Age to 22% in the Middle Roman period (Table 3); all differences are significant except for that between the overlapping Early/Middle Roman period and the Middle Roman period (Table 4). Furthermore, a strong decrease is seen in the Late Roman period, when the mean horse proportion drops to 8%. Consumer sites show much lower horse proportions in the Early and Middle Roman period. While the mean horse proportion in consumer sites increases somewhat from 3% in the Early Roman period to 5% in the Middle Roman period, this increase is not statistically significant. The only consumer site for the Late Roman period has a high proportion of 24%.

Fig. 3. Box plot for horse proportions (out of total NISP for cattle, sheep/goat, horse, and pig). (Figure by Maaike Groot.)

Table 3. Number of sites and mean proportion of horse bones per period and site type.

Table 4. Summary of statistics for horse frequencies. * = p < 0.05; ** = p < 0.01; *** = p < 0.005; N = no significant difference (Mann-Whitney pairwise test). Because there is only one Late Roman consumer site, this site/period has not been included in the statistical analysis.

Horse size: LSI

Log size values for width measurements show a large and significant increase from the Late Iron Age to the Early Roman period (Fig. 4; Tables 5–6). The slight size increase in rural sites from the Middle Roman period is not significant, but the larger increase in Middle Roman consumer sites is significant compared to both rural and consumer sites from the Early Roman period. Rural sites show another slight size increase in the Late Roman period, but again this is not significant. The decrease in size of Late Roman consumer horses compared to Middle Roman consumer horses is significant. For the Early Roman period, horses from rural and consumer sites have similar width measurements. For the Middle Roman period, however, both the range and means of horses from consumer sites are larger than those from rural sites, a difference that is significant.

Fig. 4. Box plots for log size index values for horses from the eastern river area. See Table 5 for the means and the number of measurements per period and Tables 68 for the results of statistical testing. (Figure by Maaike Groot.)

Table 5. Numbers of measurements and means for LSI values per period.

Table 6. Summary of statistics for LSI values for width measurements. * = p < 0.05; ** = p < 0.01; *** = p < 0.005; N = no significant difference (Mann-Whitney pairwise test).

Log size values for length measurements show very similar trends to the width measurements, with the largest size increase occurring in the Early Roman period (Fig. 4; Tables 5, 7). One difference is that the slight increase in rural horses in the Late Roman period is significant. Again, Early Roman rural and consumer horses are similar, while in the Middle Roman period, consumer horses show a larger mean and range than rural horses.

Table 7. Summary of statistics for LSI values for length measurements. * = p < 0.05; ** = p < 0.01; *** = p < 0.005; N = no significant difference (Mann-Whitney pairwise test).

Sample sizes for depth measurements are much smaller; nevertheless, we see the same large size increase in the Early Roman period as was visible in width and length measurements (Fig. 4; Tables 5, 8). Depth measurements show no difference between Middle Roman rural and consumer means, although the consumer range is larger.

Table 8. Summary of statistics for LSI values for depth measurements. * = p < 0.05; ** = p < 0.01; *** = p < 0.005; N = no significant difference (Mann-Whitney pairwise test).

Discussion

The strontium isotope analysis shows some evidence for mobility in horses. While we cannot exclude a non-local origin in a similar geological region, the three rural horses are likely to have been born and raised in the river area. The female military horse may also be a local horse, but it seems to have spent a brief time outside the river area, possibly in an adjacent area. The male military horse shows high mobility during the early part of formation of the third molar (after the age of 21 months). Assuming that horses would not have been sold before the age of two years, the earliest, highest values would then reflect the place where this horse was born. The second level may reflect the location where the horse received its early training, somewhere between the ages of two and three years. The third level may reflect either another training facility or the horse's first posting. Finally, still as a young horse, it ended up in the eastern river area. Of course, we cannot exclude that the later part of the tooth was formed somewhere entirely different but with similar strontium values to the river area. It is also possible that the horse experienced further mobility between the end of third molar tooth formation and its death ca. 1.5–3 years later. However, the most straightforward explanation is that the horse came to the eastern river area during the later part of tooth formation and stayed there until its death.

Horse frequencies in rural sites in the eastern river area steadily increase from the Late Iron Age to the Middle Roman period, from a mean proportion of 8% to a mean proportion of 22%; the Late Roman period shows a drop to a mean proportion of 8%. Consumer sites show low horse frequencies in the Early and Middle Roman period; this can partly be explained by differences in disposal of dead horses in rural and consumer sites, as well as a difference in horsemeat consumption. The only Late Roman consumer site shows a very high proportion of horses (24%), which may reflect a change in disposal of horse cadavers. If higher proportions reflect increased economic importance, horses became important for rural communities in the Early Roman period but then even more so in the Middle Roman period. Breeding horses for the Roman army or other Roman markets remains the most likely explanation for the high horse frequencies.

Analysis of horse width, length, and depth measurements using the log size index method reveals that horse size increased in the Early Roman period; in fact, this was when the largest increases in all three dimensions occurred. The taller, more robust horses that are present from the Early Roman period may have resulted from a combination of the import of larger animals and the selected breeding of local stock; improved nutrition may also have played a role. Horses from Early Roman rural sites appear to have been similar in size and shape to those from consumer sites, but for the Middle Roman period, horses from consumer sites are somewhat taller and more robust. The larger range for Middle Roman consumer sites (despite a much smaller sample size) can be explained by consumer sites drawing horses from a much wider region. However, the Middle Roman rural range falls within the consumer range, and the consumer horse population is likely to have contained locally bred horses as well as imported ones. Our female military horse may belong to the former category and the male military horse to the latter. Interestingly, the range for the Early Roman consumer horses is smaller than for the rural horses and also smaller than for the Middle Roman consumer horses, suggesting a more homogenous population, perhaps supplied from a smaller region.

Previous research focused on withers height, which only takes into account length measurements. The largest size increase in rural sites was seen for the Early Roman period, after which horses continued to increase in withers height into the Late Roman period.Footnote 57 We can now confirm that horses became not only taller but also more robust. The dataset for withers height for horses from consumer sites was small for most periods; however, Early Roman horses in consumer sites had higher mean withers heights than those in rural sites. This conclusion cannot be maintained after the current LSI analysis, which is based on a much larger dataset and shows similarity between Early Roman rural and consumer horses. Change in livestock size during the Roman period is well documented for both the eastern river area and other parts of the Roman Empire.Footnote 58 For the eastern river area, the main difference between size changes observed for horse and for cattle is that for cattle, the main size increase occurs in the Middle Roman period, when cattle became taller and more robust,Footnote 59 while, as we have seen above, the main change in horse had already occurred in the Early Roman period. Sheep/goat and pig are more difficult to investigate in the eastern river area because of the low proportions in some periods, resulting in insufficient measurements for chronological analysis; however, analysis of sheep/goat withers heights showed no changes in size.Footnote 60

Conclusion

This paper has presented the first strontium isotope data for Roman horses from the central Netherlands, which showed evidence for mobility of horses from military sites but not for horses from rural settlements. Of the two military horses studied, one seems to have come from outside the local region, while the second horse is likely to have been bred locally but may have spent a brief time outside the river area. Analysis of horse frequencies showed that during the Early and Middle Roman periods, horses were of significant economic importance in rural settlements. Already by the Early Roman period, larger and more robust horses are found in both consumer and rural sites. This size increase is likely to have been achieved through the import of larger horses, interbreeding with local stock, and selective breeding of local animals. If stallions were imported, just a few animals could have had a large impact on the local stock.Footnote 61 While further sampling of teeth from rural horses may identify imported horses, this will be like looking for a needle in a haystack. This is not to say that this work should not be done; only that expectations need to be realistic. Systematic sampling of horses from military and other consumer sites is more likely to identify mobility and has the potential to reveal supply patterns. Considering the small sample size of this study, further research on horse remains from rural and consumer sites in the Netherlands and other limes areas is needed to understand horse management and mobility.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Stichting Nederlands Museum voor Antropologie en Praehistorie for financially supporting this project.

Competing interests

The author(s) declare none

Footnotes

3 Groot Reference Groot2016, 118–20.

5 Groot Reference Groot2016, 119, fig. 5.45.

17 Junkelmann Reference Junkelmann1990, 50; Hyland Reference Hyland1990, 46, 82.

18 Hyland Reference Hyland1990, 46–47; Varro, Rust. 2.7.13; Verg. G. 3.190.

19 Hyland Reference Hyland1990, 82.

20 Hyland Reference Hyland1990, 67, 69.

21 Hyland Reference Hyland1990, 43.

22 Hyland Reference Hyland1990, 21.

23 Davies Reference Davies1969, 431, 453; Hyland Reference Hyland1990, 77.

24 Hyland Reference Hyland1990, 76.

25 Hyland Reference Hyland1990, 70.

26 Hyland Reference Hyland1990, 73.

27 Vossen and Groot Reference Vossen and Groot2009, 96.

29 Tac. Hist. 4.12; Alföldy Reference Alföldy1968; Bellen Reference Bellen1981.

32 Johnstone Reference Johnstone2004, 226.

34 Chuang and Bonhomme Reference Chuang and Bonhomme2019.

40 Lauwerier and Hessing Reference Lauwerier and Hessing1992.

48 E.g., Nationale Onderzoeksagenda Archeologie 2.0. https://noaa.cultureelerfgoed.nl.

50 Measurements kindly provided by Helene Benkert.

52 Humerus Bd, radius Bp, metacarpus Bp, metatarsus Bp have been included (Davis Reference Davis1996; Payne and Bull Reference Payne and Bull1988; Popkin et al. Reference Popkin, Baker, Worley, Payne and Hammon2012, 1780).

54 0.7088–0.7092; Kootker et al. Reference Kootker, van Lanen, Kars and Davies2016.

57 Groot Reference Groot2016, 122.

59 Groot and Albarella Reference Groot and Albarella2024.

60 Groot Reference Groot2016, 122.

61 Hyland Reference Hyland1990, 21, 33.

References

References

Tacitus. The Histories. Translated by Clifford Herschel Moore. Loeb Classical Library 249. London: Heinemann, 1951.Google Scholar
Varro. De re rustica. Translated by William Davis Hooper and Harrison Boyd Ash. Loeb Classical Library 283. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1934.Google Scholar
Virgil. Georgica. Translated by H. Rushton Fairclough, revised by G. P. Goold. Loeb Classical Library 63. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albarella, Umberto, Johnstone, Cluny, and Vickers, Kim. 2008. “The development of animal husbandry from the Late Iron Age to the end of the Roman period: A case study from southeast Britain.” JAS 35: 1828–48.Google Scholar
Alföldy, Géza. 1968. Die Hilfstruppen der römischen Provinz Germania Inferior. Düsseldorf: Rheinland-Verlag.Google Scholar
Bellen, Heinz. 1981. Die germanische Leibwache der römischen Kaiser des julisch-claudischen Hauses. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
Bendrey, Robin, Hayes, T. E., and Palmer, Martin R.. 2009. “Patterns of Iron Age horse supply: An analysis of strontium isotope ratios in teeth.” Archaeometry 51: 140–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendrey, Robin, Vella, Dominic, Zazzo, Antoine, Balasse, M., and Lepetz, Sébastien. 2015. “Exponentially decreasing tooth growth rate in horse teeth: Implications for isotopic analyses.” Archaeometry 57: 1104–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, R. Alexander. 2006. “Strontium isotopes from the earth to the archaeological skeleton: A review.” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 13: 135–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, R. Alexander, and Knipper, Corina. 2005. “Transhumance at the early Neolithic settlement at Vaihingen (Germany).” Antiquity 79, no. 306: Project gallery. https://antiquity.ac.uk/projgall/bentley306/.Google Scholar
Berger, T. E., Peters, Joris, and Grupe, G.. 2010. “Life history of a mule (c. 160 AD) from the Roman fort Biriciana/Weißenburg (Upper Bavaria) as revealed by serial stable isotope analysis of dental tissues.” International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 20: 158–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breuer, Guido, Rehazek, André, and Stopp, Barbara. 1999. “Grössenveränderungen des Hausrindes. Osteometrische Untersuchungen grosser Fundserien aus der Nordschweiz von der Spätlatènezeit bis ins Frühmittelalter am Beispiel von Basel, Augst (Augusta Raurica) und Schleitheim-Brüel.” Jahresberichte aus Augst und Kaiseraugst 20: 207–28.Google Scholar
Chuang, Richard, and Bonhomme, Vincent. 2019. “Rethinking the dental morphological differences between domestic equids.” JAS 101: 140–48.Google Scholar
Clavel, Pierre, Dumoncel, Jean, Sarkissian, Clio Der, Seguin-Orlando, Andaine, Calvière-Tonasso, Laure, Schiavinato, Stephanie, Chauvey, Lorelei, Perdereau, Aude, Aury, Jean-Marc, Wincker, Patrick, Onar, Vedat, Clavel, Benoît, Lepetz, Sébastien, Braga, José, and Orlando, Ludovic. 2021. “Assessing the predictive taxonomic power of the bony labyrinth 3D shape in horses, donkeys and their F1-hybrids.” JAS 131: 105383.Google Scholar
Colominas, Lídia, Schlumbaum, Angela, and Saña, Maria. 2014. “The impact of the Roman Empire on animal husbandry practices: Study of the changes in cattle morphology in the north-east of the Iberian Peninsula through osteometric and ancient DNA analyses.” Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 6: 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Roy W. 1969. “The supply of animals to the Roman army and the remount system.” Latomus 28: 429–59.Google Scholar
Davis, Simon J. M. 1996. “Measurements of a group of adult female Shetland sheep skeletons from a single flock: A baseline for zooarchaeologists.” JAS 23: 593612.Google Scholar
De Jong, Hylke N. 2013. “A Strontium Isotope Perspective on Subsistence through Intra-tooth and Inter-site Variation by LA-MC-ICP-MS and TIMS.” PhD diss., Univ. of Bristol.Google Scholar
De Jong, Hylke, Foster, G., Heyd, V., and Pike, A. W. G.. 2010. “Further Sr isotopic studies on the Eulau multiple graves using laser ablation ICP-MS.” In Anthropologie, Isotopie und DNA – Biografische Annäherung an namenlose vorgeschichtliche Skelette? ed. Meller, Harald and Alt, Kurt, 6370. Tagungen des Landesmuseums für Vorgeschichte Halle 3. Halle: Landesamt für Denkmalpflege und Archäologie Sachsen-Anhalt.Google Scholar
Dobney, Keith M., Jaques, S. Deborah, and Irving, Brian G.. 1996. Of Butchers and Breeds: Report on Vertebrate Remains from Various Sites in the City of Lincoln. Lincoln Archaeological Studies 5. Lincoln: City of Lincoln Archaeological Unit.Google Scholar
Esser, E., van Dijk, Joyce, and Groot, Maaike. 2010. “Archeozoölogisch onderzoek.” In Onder de zoden van Zaltbommel, ed. Veldman, H. A. P. and Blom, Edwin, 201–31. ADC Monografie 8. Amersfoort: ADC ArcheoProjecton.Google Scholar
Evans, Jane, Pearson, Mike Parker, Madgwick, Richard, Sloane, Hilary, and Albarella, Umberto. 2019. “Strontium and oxygen isotope evidence for the origin and movement of cattle at Late Neolithic Durrington Walls, UK.” Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 11, no. 10: 5181–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerling, Claudia, Doppler, Thomas, Heyd, Volker, Knipper, Corina, Kuhn, Thomas, Lehmann, Moritz F., Pike, Alistair W. G., and Schibler, Jörg. 2017. “High-resolution isotopic evidence of specialised cattle herding in the European Neolithic.” PLoS ONE 12, no. 7: e0180164. dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glorennec, Philippe, Lucas, Jean-Paul, Mercat, Anne-Camille, Roudot, Alain-Claude, and Le Bot, Barbara. 2016. “Environmental and dietary exposure of young children to inorganic trace elements.” Environ. Int. 97: 2836.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Granado, José D., Dill, Nadine, Gaunitz, Charleen, Fages, Antoine, Khan, Naveed, Mráz, Monica Schernig, Deschler-Erb, Sabine, Orlando, Ludovic, and Schlumbaum, Angela. 2020. “The mules that are not mules – metrics, morphology, archaeogenomics and mtDNA d-loop diversity in equids from Roman Switzerland.” JAS 123: 105253.Google Scholar
Groot, Maaike. 2008a. Animals in Ritual and Economy in a Roman Frontier Community. Excavations in Tiel-Passewaaij. Amsterdam Archaeological Studies 12. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groot, Maaike. 2008b. “Surplus production of animal products for the Roman army in a rural settlement in the Dutch River Area.” In Feeding the Roman Army: The Archaeology of Production and Supply in NW Europe, ed. Stallibrass, Sue and Thomas, Richard, 8398. Oxford: Oxbow.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groot, Maaike. 2009. “Dierlijk bot en speciale deposities met dierlijk bot.” In Opgravingen in Geldermalsen-Hondsgemet. Een inheemse nederzetting uit de Late IJzertijd en Romeinse tijd, ed. Renswoude, Jan van and Kerckhove, Julie van, 355409. Zuidnederlandse Archeologische Rapporten 35. Amsterdam: Archeologisch Centrum Vrije Universiteit/Hendrik Brunsting Stichting.Google Scholar
Groot, Maaike. 2011. “Household specialisation in horse breeding: The role of returning veterans in the Batavian river area.” In Fines imperii - imperium sine fine? Römische Okkupations- und Grenzpolitik im frühen Prinzipat, ed. Wiegels, Rainer and Moosbauer, Günther, 203–18. Osnabrücker Forschungen zu Altertum und Antike-rezeption 14. Rahden/Westf.: Verlag Marie Leidorf.Google Scholar
Groot, Maaike. 2012. “Animal bones as a tool for investigating social and economic change: Horse-breeding veterans in the civitas Batavorum.” In More than Just Numbers? The Role of Science in Roman Archaeology, ed. Schrufer-Kolb, Irene, 7192. JRA Suppl. 91. Portsmouth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology.Google Scholar
Groot, Maaike. 2016. Livestock for Sale: Animal Husbandry in a Roman Frontier Zone. Amsterdam Archaeological Studies 24. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Groot, Maaike. 2017. “Developments in animal husbandry and food supply in Roman Germania Inferior.” EJA 20, no. 3: 451–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groot, Maaike. 2020. “Farming for a growing population: Developments in agriculture in the provinces of Germania.” In The Resilience of the Roman Empire: Regional Case Studies on the Relationship between Population and Food Resources, ed. Van Limbergen, Dimitri, Maréchal, Sadi, and De Clercq, Wim, 3145. BAR International Series 3000. Oxford: BAR.Google Scholar
Groot, Maaike., Heeren, Stijn, Kooistra, Laura, and Vos, Wouter. 2009. “Surplus production for the market? The agrarian economy in the non-villa landscapes of Germania Inferior.” JRA 22: 231–52.Google Scholar
Groot, Maaike, Evans, Jane, and Albarella, Umberto. 2020. “Mobility of cattle in the Iron Age and Roman Netherlands.” JASRep 32: 102416.Google Scholar
Groot, Maaike, and Albarella, Umberto. 2024. “Cattle husbandry in the Iron Age and Roman Netherlands: Chronological developments and regional differences in cattle frequencies, management, size and shape.” PZ 99: 224–79.Google Scholar
Hanot, Pauline, Guintard, Claude, Lepetz, Sébastien, and Cornette, Raphaël. 2017. “Identifying domestic horses, donkeys and hybrids from archaeological deposits: A 3D morphological investigation on skeletons.” JAS 78: 8898.Google Scholar
Hanot, Pauline, and Bochaton, Corentin. 2018. “New osteological criteria for the identification of domestic horses, donkeys and their hybrids in archaeological contexts.” JAS 94: 1220.Google Scholar
Hessing, W. A. M. 2001. “Paardenfokkers in het grensgebied. De Bataafse nederzetting op De Woerd bij Kesteren.” In Opgespoord verleden. Archeologie in de Betuweroute, ed. Carmiggelt, A., 142–72. Abcoude: Uniepers.Google Scholar
Hoppe, Kathryn A., Stover, Susan M., Pascoe, John R., and Amundson, Ronald. 2004. “Tooth enamel biomineralization in extant horses: Implications for isotopic microsampling.” Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 206: 355–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ann. 1990. Equus: The Horse in the Roman World. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Cluny J. 2004. “A Biometric Study of Equids in the Roman World.” PhD diss., Univ. of York.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Cluny. 2008. “Commodities or logistics? The role of equids in Roman supply networks.” In Feeding the Roman Army: The Archaeology of Production and Supply in NW Europe, ed. Stallibrass, Sue and Thomas, Richard, 128–45. Oxford: Oxbow.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Junkelmann, Marcus. 1990. Die Reiter Roms. Teil I: Reise, Jagd, Triumph und Circusrennen. Mainz am Rhein: Philipp von Zabern.Google Scholar
Kootker, Lisette M., van Lanen, Rowin J., Kars, Henk, and Davies, Gareth R.. 2016. “Strontium isoscapes in the Netherlands. Spatial variations in 87Sr/86Sr as a proxy for palaeomobility.” JASRep 6: 113.Google Scholar
Kootker, Lisette M., Geerdink, Coen, van den Broeke, Peter W., Kars, Henk, and Davies, Gareth R.. 2018. “Breaking traditions: An isotopic study on the changing funerary practices in the Dutch Iron Age (800–12 BC).” Archaeometry 60: 594611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laarman, F. J. 1996a. “The zoological remains.” In Borderland Farming: Possibilities and Limitations of Farming in the Roman Period and Early Middle Ages between the Rhine and Meuse, ed. Kooistra, Laura I., 343–57. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Laarman, F. J. 1996b. “Zoological material of the Bronze Age, Iron Age and Roman period from Wijk bij Duurstede-De Horden.” In Borderland Farming: Possibilities and Limitations of Farming in the Roman Period and Early Middle Ages between the Rhine and Meuse, ed. Kooistra, Laura I., 369–80. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Lauwerier, Roel C. G. M. 1988. Animals in Roman Times in the Dutch Eastern River Area. Nederlandse Oudheden 12. Amersfoort: Rijksdienst voor het Oudheidkundig Bodemonderzoek.Google Scholar
Lauwerier, Roel C. G. M, and Hessing, Wilfried A. M.. 1992. “Men, horses and the Miss Blanche effect: Roman horse burials in a cemetery at Kesteren, The Netherlands.” Helinium 32, no. 1–2: 78109.Google Scholar
Lauwerier, Roel C. G. M., and Robeerst, Annemiek J. M. M.. 2001. “Horses in Roman times in the Netherlands.” In Animals and Man in the Past. Essays in Honour of A.T. Clason Emeritus Professor of Archaeozoology Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, the Netherlands, ed. Buitenhuis, H. and Prummel, Wietske, 275–90. Groningen: Archaeological Research and Consultancy.Google Scholar
Lepetz, Sébastien. 1996. L'animal dans la société Gallo-romaine de la France du Nord. Amiens: Revue archéologique de Picardie.Google Scholar
Lepetz, Sébastien, Clavel, Benoît, Alioğlu, Duha, Chauvey, Lorelei, Schiavinato, Stéphanie, Tonasso-Calvière, Laure, Liu, Xuexue, Fages, Antoine, Khan, Naveed, Seguin-Orlando, Andaine, Sarkissian, Clio Der, Clavel, Pierre, Estrada, Oscar, Gaunitz, Charleen, Aury, Jean-Marc, Barme, Maude, Boulbes, Nicolas, Bourgois, Alice, Decanter, Franck, Foucras, Sylvain, Frère, Stéphane, Gardeisen, Armelle, Jouanin, Gaëtan, Méla, Charlotte, Morand, Nicolas, Espinet, Ariadna Nieto, Perdereau, Aude, Putelat, Olivier, Rivière, Julie, Robin, Opale, Salin, Marilyne, Valenzuela-Lamas, Silvia, Vallet, Christian, Yvinec, Jean-Hervé, Wincker, Patrick, and Orlando, Ludovic. 2021. “Historical management of equine resources in France from the Iron Age to the Modern Period.” JASRep 40, Part B: 103250.Google Scholar
Lewis, Jamie, Coath, C. D., and Pike, A. W. G.. 2014. “An improved protocol for 87Sr/86Sr by laser ablation multi-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry using oxide reduction and a customised plasma interface.” Chemical Geology 390: 173–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Jamie, Pike, A. W. G., Coath, C. D., and Evershed, R. P.. 2017. “Strontium concentration, radiogenic (87Sr/86Sr) and stable (δ88Sr) strontium isotope systematics in a controlled feeding study.” Sci. Technol. Archaeol. Res. 3: 4557.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Michael. 2010. “Cattle ‘breed’ variation and improvement in Roman Italy: Connecting the zooarchaeological and ancient textual evidence.” WorldArch 42, no. 1: 5573.Google Scholar
Madgwick, Richard, Lamb, Angela L., Sloane, H., Nederbragt, A. J., Albarella, Umberto, Parker Pearson, Mike, and Evans, Jane. 2019. “Multi-isotope analysis reveals that feasts in the Stonehenge environs and across Wessex drew people and animals from throughout Britain.” Science Advances 5: eaau6078. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aau6078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManus, Ellen, Montgomery, Janet, Evans, Jane, Lamb, Angela, Brettell, Rhea, and Jelsma, Johan. 2013. “‘To the land or to the sea’: Diet and mobility in early medieval Frisia.” The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology 8, no. 2: 255–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meadow, Richard H. 1984. “Animal domestication in the Middle East: A view from the eastern margin.” In Animals and Archaeology, ed. Clutton-Brock, Juliet and Grigson, Caroline, 309–37. BAR International Series 202. Oxford: BAR.Google Scholar
Meadow, Richard H. 1999. “The use of size index scaling techniques for research on archaeozoological collections from the Middle East.” In Historia Animalium ex Ossibus. Festschrift für Angela von den Driesch, ed. Becker, Cornelia, Manhart, Henriette, Peters, Joris, and Schibler, Jorg, 285300. Rahden/Westf.: Leidorf.Google Scholar
Minniti, Claudia, Silvia Valenzuela-Lamas, Jane Evans, and Albarella, Umberto. 2014. “Widening the market: strontium isotope analysis on cattle teeth from Owslebury (Hampshire, UK) highlights changes in livestock supply between the Iron Age and the Roman period.” JAS 42: 305–14.Google Scholar
Nationale Onderzoeksagenda Archeologie 2.0. 2019. https://noaa.cultureelerfgoed.nl.Google Scholar
Nier, Alfred O. 1938. “The isotopic constitution of strontium, barium, bismuth, thallium and mercury.” Physical Review 54, no. 4: 275–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paladugu, Roshan, Richter, Kristine Korzow, Valente, Maria João, Gabriel, Sónia, Detry, Cleia, Warinner, Christina, and Dias, Cristina Barrocas. 2023. “Your horse is a donkey! Identifying domesticated equids from Western Iberia using collagen fingerprinting.” JAS 149: 105696.Google Scholar
Payne, S., and Bull, G.. 1988. “Components of variation in measurements of pig bones and teeth, and the use of measurements to distinguish wild from domestic pig remains.” Archaeozoologia 2, no. 1–2: 2766.Google Scholar
Peters, Joris. 1998. Römische Tierhaltung und Tierzucht. Eine Synthese aus archäozoologischer Untersuchung und schriftlich-bildlicher Überlieferung. Passauer Universitätsschriften zur Archäologie 5. Rahden/Westf.: Leidorf.Google Scholar
Popkin, Peter R. W., Baker, Polydora, Worley, Fay, Payne, Sebastian, and Hammon, Andy. 2012. “The Sheep Project (1): Determining skeletal growth, timing of epiphyseal fusion and morphometric variation in unimproved Shetland sheep of known age, sex, castration status and nutrition.” JAS 39: 1775–92.Google Scholar
Rizzetto, Mauro, Crabtree, Pam J., and Albarella, Umberto. 2017. “Livestock changes at the beginning and end of the Roman period in Britain: Issues of acculturation, adaptation, and ‘improvement’.” EJA 20, no. 3: 535–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robeerst, Annemiek J. M. M. 2005. “Interaction and exchange in food production in the Nijmegen frontier area during the Early Roman Period.” In TRAC 2004: Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference, University of Durham 2627 March 2004, ed. Bruhn, James, Croxfrod, Ben, and Grigoropoulos, Dimitris, 7996. Oxford: Oxbow. https://doi.org/10.16995/TRAC2004_79_96.Google Scholar
Roymans, Nico. 1996. “The sword or the plough. Regional dynamics in the romanisation of Belgic Gaul and the Rhineland area.” In From the Sword to the Plough: Three Studies on the Earliest Romanisation of Northern Gaul, ed. Roymans, Nico, 9127. Amsterdam Archaeological Studies 1. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roymans, Nico, and Habermehl, Diederick. 2023. “Migration and ethnic dynamics in the Lower Rhine frontier zone of the expanding Roman Empire (60 BC–AD 20): A historical-anthropological perspective.” ProcBritAc 254: 292312.Google Scholar
Russell, W. A., Papanastassiou, D. A., and Tombrello, T. A.. 1978. “Ca isotope fractionation on the Earth and other solar system materials.” Geochimica et cosmochimica acta 42, no. 8: 1075–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlumbaum, Angela, Stopp, Barbara, Breuer, Guido, Rehazek, André, Turgay, Meral, Blatter, Robert, and Schibler, Jörg. 2003. “Combining archaeozoology and molecular genetics: The reason behind the changes in cattle size between 150 BC and 700 AD in northern Switzerland.” Antiquity 77, no. 298: Project gallery. http://antiquity.ac.uk/projgall/schlumbaum298/.Google Scholar
Sharif, Muhammad Bilal, Mohaseb, Azadeh Fatemeh, Zimmermann, Michaela Isabell, Trixl, Simon, Saliari, Konstantina, Kunst, Günther Karl, Cucchi, Thomas, Czeika, Sigrid, Mashkour, Marjan, Orlando, Ludovic, Schaefer, Katrin, Peters, Joris, and Mohandesan, Elmira. 2022. “Ancient DNA refines taxonomic classification of Roman equids north of the Alps, elaborated with osteomorphology and geometric morphometrics.” JAS 143: 105624.Google Scholar
Sykes, Naomi, White, Judith, Hayes, Tina E., and Palmer, Martin R.. 2006. “Tracking animals using strontium isotopes in teeth: The role of fallow deer (Dama dama) in Roman Britain.” Antiquity 80, no. 310: 948–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teichert, Manfred. 1984. “Size variation in cattle from Germania Romana and Germania Libera.” In Animals in Archaeology: 4. Husbandry in Europe, ed. Grigson, Caroline and Clutton-Brock, Juliet, 93104. BAR International Series 227. Oxford: BAR.Google Scholar
Towers, Jacqueline, Montgomery, Janet, Evans, Jane, Jay, Mandy, and Pearson, Mike Parker. 2010. “An investigation of the origins of cattle and aurochs deposited in the Early Bronze Age barrows at Gayhurst and Irthlingborough.” JAS 37: 508–15.Google Scholar
Uerpmann, Hans-Peter. 1990. “Die Domestikation des Pferdes im Chalkolithikum West- und Mitteleuropas.” MM 31: 109–53.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Alejandro, Alcover, Josep Antoni, and Cau, Miguel Angel. 2013. “Tracing changes in animal husbandry in Mallorca (Balearic Islands, western Mediterranean) from the Iron Age to the Roman period.” In Barely Surviving or More than Enough? The Environmental Archaeology of Subsistence, Specialisation and Surplus Food Production, ed. Groot, Maaike, Lentjes, Daphne, and Zeiler, Jørn, 201–23. Leiden: SidestoneGoogle Scholar
Van der Jagt, Inge M. M., Kootker, Lisette M., van Kolfschoten, Thijs, Kars, Henk, and Davies, Gareth R.. 2012. “An insight into animal exchange in early medieval Oegstgeest: A combined archaeozoological and isotopic approach.” In A Bouquet of Archaeological Studies: Essays in Honour of Wietske Prummel, ed. Raemaekers, D. C. M., Esser, E., Lauwerier, Roel C. G. M., and Zeiler, Jørn T., 139–49. Groningen Archaeological Studies 21. Groningen: Barkhuis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viner, Sarah, Evans, Jane, Albarella, Umberto, and Pearson, Mike Parker. 2010. “Cattle mobility in prehistoric Britain: Strontium isotope analysis of cattle teeth from Durrington Walls (Wiltshire, Britain).” JAS 37: 2812–20.Google Scholar
Vossen, Ivo, and Groot, Maaike. 2009. “Barley and horses: Surplus and demand in the civitas Batavorum.” In TRAC 2008. Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference held at The University of Amsterdam 4–6 April, 2008, ed. Mark Driessen, S. Heeren, J. Hendriks, F. Kemmers and R. Visser, 85–100. Oxford: Oxbow. https://doi.org/10.16995/TRAC2008_85_100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willmes, Malte, Kinsley, L., Moncel, Marie-Hélène, Armstrong, Richard A., Aubert, Maxime, Eggins, Stephen, and Grün, R.. 2016. “Improvement of laser ablation in situ micro-analysis to identify diagenetic alteration and measure strontium isotope ratios in fossil human teeth.” JAS 70: 102–16.Google Scholar
Tacitus. The Histories. Translated by Clifford Herschel Moore. Loeb Classical Library 249. London: Heinemann, 1951.Google Scholar
Varro. De re rustica. Translated by William Davis Hooper and Harrison Boyd Ash. Loeb Classical Library 283. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1934.Google Scholar
Virgil. Georgica. Translated by H. Rushton Fairclough, revised by G. P. Goold. Loeb Classical Library 63. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albarella, Umberto, Johnstone, Cluny, and Vickers, Kim. 2008. “The development of animal husbandry from the Late Iron Age to the end of the Roman period: A case study from southeast Britain.” JAS 35: 1828–48.Google Scholar
Alföldy, Géza. 1968. Die Hilfstruppen der römischen Provinz Germania Inferior. Düsseldorf: Rheinland-Verlag.Google Scholar
Bellen, Heinz. 1981. Die germanische Leibwache der römischen Kaiser des julisch-claudischen Hauses. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
Bendrey, Robin, Hayes, T. E., and Palmer, Martin R.. 2009. “Patterns of Iron Age horse supply: An analysis of strontium isotope ratios in teeth.” Archaeometry 51: 140–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendrey, Robin, Vella, Dominic, Zazzo, Antoine, Balasse, M., and Lepetz, Sébastien. 2015. “Exponentially decreasing tooth growth rate in horse teeth: Implications for isotopic analyses.” Archaeometry 57: 1104–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, R. Alexander. 2006. “Strontium isotopes from the earth to the archaeological skeleton: A review.” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 13: 135–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, R. Alexander, and Knipper, Corina. 2005. “Transhumance at the early Neolithic settlement at Vaihingen (Germany).” Antiquity 79, no. 306: Project gallery. https://antiquity.ac.uk/projgall/bentley306/.Google Scholar
Berger, T. E., Peters, Joris, and Grupe, G.. 2010. “Life history of a mule (c. 160 AD) from the Roman fort Biriciana/Weißenburg (Upper Bavaria) as revealed by serial stable isotope analysis of dental tissues.” International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 20: 158–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breuer, Guido, Rehazek, André, and Stopp, Barbara. 1999. “Grössenveränderungen des Hausrindes. Osteometrische Untersuchungen grosser Fundserien aus der Nordschweiz von der Spätlatènezeit bis ins Frühmittelalter am Beispiel von Basel, Augst (Augusta Raurica) und Schleitheim-Brüel.” Jahresberichte aus Augst und Kaiseraugst 20: 207–28.Google Scholar
Chuang, Richard, and Bonhomme, Vincent. 2019. “Rethinking the dental morphological differences between domestic equids.” JAS 101: 140–48.Google Scholar
Clavel, Pierre, Dumoncel, Jean, Sarkissian, Clio Der, Seguin-Orlando, Andaine, Calvière-Tonasso, Laure, Schiavinato, Stephanie, Chauvey, Lorelei, Perdereau, Aude, Aury, Jean-Marc, Wincker, Patrick, Onar, Vedat, Clavel, Benoît, Lepetz, Sébastien, Braga, José, and Orlando, Ludovic. 2021. “Assessing the predictive taxonomic power of the bony labyrinth 3D shape in horses, donkeys and their F1-hybrids.” JAS 131: 105383.Google Scholar
Colominas, Lídia, Schlumbaum, Angela, and Saña, Maria. 2014. “The impact of the Roman Empire on animal husbandry practices: Study of the changes in cattle morphology in the north-east of the Iberian Peninsula through osteometric and ancient DNA analyses.” Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 6: 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Roy W. 1969. “The supply of animals to the Roman army and the remount system.” Latomus 28: 429–59.Google Scholar
Davis, Simon J. M. 1996. “Measurements of a group of adult female Shetland sheep skeletons from a single flock: A baseline for zooarchaeologists.” JAS 23: 593612.Google Scholar
De Jong, Hylke N. 2013. “A Strontium Isotope Perspective on Subsistence through Intra-tooth and Inter-site Variation by LA-MC-ICP-MS and TIMS.” PhD diss., Univ. of Bristol.Google Scholar
De Jong, Hylke, Foster, G., Heyd, V., and Pike, A. W. G.. 2010. “Further Sr isotopic studies on the Eulau multiple graves using laser ablation ICP-MS.” In Anthropologie, Isotopie und DNA – Biografische Annäherung an namenlose vorgeschichtliche Skelette? ed. Meller, Harald and Alt, Kurt, 6370. Tagungen des Landesmuseums für Vorgeschichte Halle 3. Halle: Landesamt für Denkmalpflege und Archäologie Sachsen-Anhalt.Google Scholar
Dobney, Keith M., Jaques, S. Deborah, and Irving, Brian G.. 1996. Of Butchers and Breeds: Report on Vertebrate Remains from Various Sites in the City of Lincoln. Lincoln Archaeological Studies 5. Lincoln: City of Lincoln Archaeological Unit.Google Scholar
Esser, E., van Dijk, Joyce, and Groot, Maaike. 2010. “Archeozoölogisch onderzoek.” In Onder de zoden van Zaltbommel, ed. Veldman, H. A. P. and Blom, Edwin, 201–31. ADC Monografie 8. Amersfoort: ADC ArcheoProjecton.Google Scholar
Evans, Jane, Pearson, Mike Parker, Madgwick, Richard, Sloane, Hilary, and Albarella, Umberto. 2019. “Strontium and oxygen isotope evidence for the origin and movement of cattle at Late Neolithic Durrington Walls, UK.” Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 11, no. 10: 5181–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerling, Claudia, Doppler, Thomas, Heyd, Volker, Knipper, Corina, Kuhn, Thomas, Lehmann, Moritz F., Pike, Alistair W. G., and Schibler, Jörg. 2017. “High-resolution isotopic evidence of specialised cattle herding in the European Neolithic.” PLoS ONE 12, no. 7: e0180164. dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glorennec, Philippe, Lucas, Jean-Paul, Mercat, Anne-Camille, Roudot, Alain-Claude, and Le Bot, Barbara. 2016. “Environmental and dietary exposure of young children to inorganic trace elements.” Environ. Int. 97: 2836.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Granado, José D., Dill, Nadine, Gaunitz, Charleen, Fages, Antoine, Khan, Naveed, Mráz, Monica Schernig, Deschler-Erb, Sabine, Orlando, Ludovic, and Schlumbaum, Angela. 2020. “The mules that are not mules – metrics, morphology, archaeogenomics and mtDNA d-loop diversity in equids from Roman Switzerland.” JAS 123: 105253.Google Scholar
Groot, Maaike. 2008a. Animals in Ritual and Economy in a Roman Frontier Community. Excavations in Tiel-Passewaaij. Amsterdam Archaeological Studies 12. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groot, Maaike. 2008b. “Surplus production of animal products for the Roman army in a rural settlement in the Dutch River Area.” In Feeding the Roman Army: The Archaeology of Production and Supply in NW Europe, ed. Stallibrass, Sue and Thomas, Richard, 8398. Oxford: Oxbow.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groot, Maaike. 2009. “Dierlijk bot en speciale deposities met dierlijk bot.” In Opgravingen in Geldermalsen-Hondsgemet. Een inheemse nederzetting uit de Late IJzertijd en Romeinse tijd, ed. Renswoude, Jan van and Kerckhove, Julie van, 355409. Zuidnederlandse Archeologische Rapporten 35. Amsterdam: Archeologisch Centrum Vrije Universiteit/Hendrik Brunsting Stichting.Google Scholar
Groot, Maaike. 2011. “Household specialisation in horse breeding: The role of returning veterans in the Batavian river area.” In Fines imperii - imperium sine fine? Römische Okkupations- und Grenzpolitik im frühen Prinzipat, ed. Wiegels, Rainer and Moosbauer, Günther, 203–18. Osnabrücker Forschungen zu Altertum und Antike-rezeption 14. Rahden/Westf.: Verlag Marie Leidorf.Google Scholar
Groot, Maaike. 2012. “Animal bones as a tool for investigating social and economic change: Horse-breeding veterans in the civitas Batavorum.” In More than Just Numbers? The Role of Science in Roman Archaeology, ed. Schrufer-Kolb, Irene, 7192. JRA Suppl. 91. Portsmouth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology.Google Scholar
Groot, Maaike. 2016. Livestock for Sale: Animal Husbandry in a Roman Frontier Zone. Amsterdam Archaeological Studies 24. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Groot, Maaike. 2017. “Developments in animal husbandry and food supply in Roman Germania Inferior.” EJA 20, no. 3: 451–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groot, Maaike. 2020. “Farming for a growing population: Developments in agriculture in the provinces of Germania.” In The Resilience of the Roman Empire: Regional Case Studies on the Relationship between Population and Food Resources, ed. Van Limbergen, Dimitri, Maréchal, Sadi, and De Clercq, Wim, 3145. BAR International Series 3000. Oxford: BAR.Google Scholar
Groot, Maaike., Heeren, Stijn, Kooistra, Laura, and Vos, Wouter. 2009. “Surplus production for the market? The agrarian economy in the non-villa landscapes of Germania Inferior.” JRA 22: 231–52.Google Scholar
Groot, Maaike, Evans, Jane, and Albarella, Umberto. 2020. “Mobility of cattle in the Iron Age and Roman Netherlands.” JASRep 32: 102416.Google Scholar
Groot, Maaike, and Albarella, Umberto. 2024. “Cattle husbandry in the Iron Age and Roman Netherlands: Chronological developments and regional differences in cattle frequencies, management, size and shape.” PZ 99: 224–79.Google Scholar
Hanot, Pauline, Guintard, Claude, Lepetz, Sébastien, and Cornette, Raphaël. 2017. “Identifying domestic horses, donkeys and hybrids from archaeological deposits: A 3D morphological investigation on skeletons.” JAS 78: 8898.Google Scholar
Hanot, Pauline, and Bochaton, Corentin. 2018. “New osteological criteria for the identification of domestic horses, donkeys and their hybrids in archaeological contexts.” JAS 94: 1220.Google Scholar
Hessing, W. A. M. 2001. “Paardenfokkers in het grensgebied. De Bataafse nederzetting op De Woerd bij Kesteren.” In Opgespoord verleden. Archeologie in de Betuweroute, ed. Carmiggelt, A., 142–72. Abcoude: Uniepers.Google Scholar
Hoppe, Kathryn A., Stover, Susan M., Pascoe, John R., and Amundson, Ronald. 2004. “Tooth enamel biomineralization in extant horses: Implications for isotopic microsampling.” Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 206: 355–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ann. 1990. Equus: The Horse in the Roman World. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Cluny J. 2004. “A Biometric Study of Equids in the Roman World.” PhD diss., Univ. of York.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Cluny. 2008. “Commodities or logistics? The role of equids in Roman supply networks.” In Feeding the Roman Army: The Archaeology of Production and Supply in NW Europe, ed. Stallibrass, Sue and Thomas, Richard, 128–45. Oxford: Oxbow.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Junkelmann, Marcus. 1990. Die Reiter Roms. Teil I: Reise, Jagd, Triumph und Circusrennen. Mainz am Rhein: Philipp von Zabern.Google Scholar
Kootker, Lisette M., van Lanen, Rowin J., Kars, Henk, and Davies, Gareth R.. 2016. “Strontium isoscapes in the Netherlands. Spatial variations in 87Sr/86Sr as a proxy for palaeomobility.” JASRep 6: 113.Google Scholar
Kootker, Lisette M., Geerdink, Coen, van den Broeke, Peter W., Kars, Henk, and Davies, Gareth R.. 2018. “Breaking traditions: An isotopic study on the changing funerary practices in the Dutch Iron Age (800–12 BC).” Archaeometry 60: 594611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laarman, F. J. 1996a. “The zoological remains.” In Borderland Farming: Possibilities and Limitations of Farming in the Roman Period and Early Middle Ages between the Rhine and Meuse, ed. Kooistra, Laura I., 343–57. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Laarman, F. J. 1996b. “Zoological material of the Bronze Age, Iron Age and Roman period from Wijk bij Duurstede-De Horden.” In Borderland Farming: Possibilities and Limitations of Farming in the Roman Period and Early Middle Ages between the Rhine and Meuse, ed. Kooistra, Laura I., 369–80. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Lauwerier, Roel C. G. M. 1988. Animals in Roman Times in the Dutch Eastern River Area. Nederlandse Oudheden 12. Amersfoort: Rijksdienst voor het Oudheidkundig Bodemonderzoek.Google Scholar
Lauwerier, Roel C. G. M, and Hessing, Wilfried A. M.. 1992. “Men, horses and the Miss Blanche effect: Roman horse burials in a cemetery at Kesteren, The Netherlands.” Helinium 32, no. 1–2: 78109.Google Scholar
Lauwerier, Roel C. G. M., and Robeerst, Annemiek J. M. M.. 2001. “Horses in Roman times in the Netherlands.” In Animals and Man in the Past. Essays in Honour of A.T. Clason Emeritus Professor of Archaeozoology Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, the Netherlands, ed. Buitenhuis, H. and Prummel, Wietske, 275–90. Groningen: Archaeological Research and Consultancy.Google Scholar
Lepetz, Sébastien. 1996. L'animal dans la société Gallo-romaine de la France du Nord. Amiens: Revue archéologique de Picardie.Google Scholar
Lepetz, Sébastien, Clavel, Benoît, Alioğlu, Duha, Chauvey, Lorelei, Schiavinato, Stéphanie, Tonasso-Calvière, Laure, Liu, Xuexue, Fages, Antoine, Khan, Naveed, Seguin-Orlando, Andaine, Sarkissian, Clio Der, Clavel, Pierre, Estrada, Oscar, Gaunitz, Charleen, Aury, Jean-Marc, Barme, Maude, Boulbes, Nicolas, Bourgois, Alice, Decanter, Franck, Foucras, Sylvain, Frère, Stéphane, Gardeisen, Armelle, Jouanin, Gaëtan, Méla, Charlotte, Morand, Nicolas, Espinet, Ariadna Nieto, Perdereau, Aude, Putelat, Olivier, Rivière, Julie, Robin, Opale, Salin, Marilyne, Valenzuela-Lamas, Silvia, Vallet, Christian, Yvinec, Jean-Hervé, Wincker, Patrick, and Orlando, Ludovic. 2021. “Historical management of equine resources in France from the Iron Age to the Modern Period.” JASRep 40, Part B: 103250.Google Scholar
Lewis, Jamie, Coath, C. D., and Pike, A. W. G.. 2014. “An improved protocol for 87Sr/86Sr by laser ablation multi-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry using oxide reduction and a customised plasma interface.” Chemical Geology 390: 173–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Jamie, Pike, A. W. G., Coath, C. D., and Evershed, R. P.. 2017. “Strontium concentration, radiogenic (87Sr/86Sr) and stable (δ88Sr) strontium isotope systematics in a controlled feeding study.” Sci. Technol. Archaeol. Res. 3: 4557.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Michael. 2010. “Cattle ‘breed’ variation and improvement in Roman Italy: Connecting the zooarchaeological and ancient textual evidence.” WorldArch 42, no. 1: 5573.Google Scholar
Madgwick, Richard, Lamb, Angela L., Sloane, H., Nederbragt, A. J., Albarella, Umberto, Parker Pearson, Mike, and Evans, Jane. 2019. “Multi-isotope analysis reveals that feasts in the Stonehenge environs and across Wessex drew people and animals from throughout Britain.” Science Advances 5: eaau6078. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aau6078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManus, Ellen, Montgomery, Janet, Evans, Jane, Lamb, Angela, Brettell, Rhea, and Jelsma, Johan. 2013. “‘To the land or to the sea’: Diet and mobility in early medieval Frisia.” The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology 8, no. 2: 255–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meadow, Richard H. 1984. “Animal domestication in the Middle East: A view from the eastern margin.” In Animals and Archaeology, ed. Clutton-Brock, Juliet and Grigson, Caroline, 309–37. BAR International Series 202. Oxford: BAR.Google Scholar
Meadow, Richard H. 1999. “The use of size index scaling techniques for research on archaeozoological collections from the Middle East.” In Historia Animalium ex Ossibus. Festschrift für Angela von den Driesch, ed. Becker, Cornelia, Manhart, Henriette, Peters, Joris, and Schibler, Jorg, 285300. Rahden/Westf.: Leidorf.Google Scholar
Minniti, Claudia, Silvia Valenzuela-Lamas, Jane Evans, and Albarella, Umberto. 2014. “Widening the market: strontium isotope analysis on cattle teeth from Owslebury (Hampshire, UK) highlights changes in livestock supply between the Iron Age and the Roman period.” JAS 42: 305–14.Google Scholar
Nationale Onderzoeksagenda Archeologie 2.0. 2019. https://noaa.cultureelerfgoed.nl.Google Scholar
Nier, Alfred O. 1938. “The isotopic constitution of strontium, barium, bismuth, thallium and mercury.” Physical Review 54, no. 4: 275–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paladugu, Roshan, Richter, Kristine Korzow, Valente, Maria João, Gabriel, Sónia, Detry, Cleia, Warinner, Christina, and Dias, Cristina Barrocas. 2023. “Your horse is a donkey! Identifying domesticated equids from Western Iberia using collagen fingerprinting.” JAS 149: 105696.Google Scholar
Payne, S., and Bull, G.. 1988. “Components of variation in measurements of pig bones and teeth, and the use of measurements to distinguish wild from domestic pig remains.” Archaeozoologia 2, no. 1–2: 2766.Google Scholar
Peters, Joris. 1998. Römische Tierhaltung und Tierzucht. Eine Synthese aus archäozoologischer Untersuchung und schriftlich-bildlicher Überlieferung. Passauer Universitätsschriften zur Archäologie 5. Rahden/Westf.: Leidorf.Google Scholar
Popkin, Peter R. W., Baker, Polydora, Worley, Fay, Payne, Sebastian, and Hammon, Andy. 2012. “The Sheep Project (1): Determining skeletal growth, timing of epiphyseal fusion and morphometric variation in unimproved Shetland sheep of known age, sex, castration status and nutrition.” JAS 39: 1775–92.Google Scholar
Rizzetto, Mauro, Crabtree, Pam J., and Albarella, Umberto. 2017. “Livestock changes at the beginning and end of the Roman period in Britain: Issues of acculturation, adaptation, and ‘improvement’.” EJA 20, no. 3: 535–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robeerst, Annemiek J. M. M. 2005. “Interaction and exchange in food production in the Nijmegen frontier area during the Early Roman Period.” In TRAC 2004: Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference, University of Durham 2627 March 2004, ed. Bruhn, James, Croxfrod, Ben, and Grigoropoulos, Dimitris, 7996. Oxford: Oxbow. https://doi.org/10.16995/TRAC2004_79_96.Google Scholar
Roymans, Nico. 1996. “The sword or the plough. Regional dynamics in the romanisation of Belgic Gaul and the Rhineland area.” In From the Sword to the Plough: Three Studies on the Earliest Romanisation of Northern Gaul, ed. Roymans, Nico, 9127. Amsterdam Archaeological Studies 1. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roymans, Nico, and Habermehl, Diederick. 2023. “Migration and ethnic dynamics in the Lower Rhine frontier zone of the expanding Roman Empire (60 BC–AD 20): A historical-anthropological perspective.” ProcBritAc 254: 292312.Google Scholar
Russell, W. A., Papanastassiou, D. A., and Tombrello, T. A.. 1978. “Ca isotope fractionation on the Earth and other solar system materials.” Geochimica et cosmochimica acta 42, no. 8: 1075–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlumbaum, Angela, Stopp, Barbara, Breuer, Guido, Rehazek, André, Turgay, Meral, Blatter, Robert, and Schibler, Jörg. 2003. “Combining archaeozoology and molecular genetics: The reason behind the changes in cattle size between 150 BC and 700 AD in northern Switzerland.” Antiquity 77, no. 298: Project gallery. http://antiquity.ac.uk/projgall/schlumbaum298/.Google Scholar
Sharif, Muhammad Bilal, Mohaseb, Azadeh Fatemeh, Zimmermann, Michaela Isabell, Trixl, Simon, Saliari, Konstantina, Kunst, Günther Karl, Cucchi, Thomas, Czeika, Sigrid, Mashkour, Marjan, Orlando, Ludovic, Schaefer, Katrin, Peters, Joris, and Mohandesan, Elmira. 2022. “Ancient DNA refines taxonomic classification of Roman equids north of the Alps, elaborated with osteomorphology and geometric morphometrics.” JAS 143: 105624.Google Scholar
Sykes, Naomi, White, Judith, Hayes, Tina E., and Palmer, Martin R.. 2006. “Tracking animals using strontium isotopes in teeth: The role of fallow deer (Dama dama) in Roman Britain.” Antiquity 80, no. 310: 948–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teichert, Manfred. 1984. “Size variation in cattle from Germania Romana and Germania Libera.” In Animals in Archaeology: 4. Husbandry in Europe, ed. Grigson, Caroline and Clutton-Brock, Juliet, 93104. BAR International Series 227. Oxford: BAR.Google Scholar
Towers, Jacqueline, Montgomery, Janet, Evans, Jane, Jay, Mandy, and Pearson, Mike Parker. 2010. “An investigation of the origins of cattle and aurochs deposited in the Early Bronze Age barrows at Gayhurst and Irthlingborough.” JAS 37: 508–15.Google Scholar
Uerpmann, Hans-Peter. 1990. “Die Domestikation des Pferdes im Chalkolithikum West- und Mitteleuropas.” MM 31: 109–53.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Alejandro, Alcover, Josep Antoni, and Cau, Miguel Angel. 2013. “Tracing changes in animal husbandry in Mallorca (Balearic Islands, western Mediterranean) from the Iron Age to the Roman period.” In Barely Surviving or More than Enough? The Environmental Archaeology of Subsistence, Specialisation and Surplus Food Production, ed. Groot, Maaike, Lentjes, Daphne, and Zeiler, Jørn, 201–23. Leiden: SidestoneGoogle Scholar
Van der Jagt, Inge M. M., Kootker, Lisette M., van Kolfschoten, Thijs, Kars, Henk, and Davies, Gareth R.. 2012. “An insight into animal exchange in early medieval Oegstgeest: A combined archaeozoological and isotopic approach.” In A Bouquet of Archaeological Studies: Essays in Honour of Wietske Prummel, ed. Raemaekers, D. C. M., Esser, E., Lauwerier, Roel C. G. M., and Zeiler, Jørn T., 139–49. Groningen Archaeological Studies 21. Groningen: Barkhuis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viner, Sarah, Evans, Jane, Albarella, Umberto, and Pearson, Mike Parker. 2010. “Cattle mobility in prehistoric Britain: Strontium isotope analysis of cattle teeth from Durrington Walls (Wiltshire, Britain).” JAS 37: 2812–20.Google Scholar
Vossen, Ivo, and Groot, Maaike. 2009. “Barley and horses: Surplus and demand in the civitas Batavorum.” In TRAC 2008. Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference held at The University of Amsterdam 4–6 April, 2008, ed. Mark Driessen, S. Heeren, J. Hendriks, F. Kemmers and R. Visser, 85–100. Oxford: Oxbow. https://doi.org/10.16995/TRAC2008_85_100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willmes, Malte, Kinsley, L., Moncel, Marie-Hélène, Armstrong, Richard A., Aubert, Maxime, Eggins, Stephen, and Grün, R.. 2016. “Improvement of laser ablation in situ micro-analysis to identify diagenetic alteration and measure strontium isotope ratios in fossil human teeth.” JAS 70: 102–16.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Map of the Netherlands showing the research area and the sites from which the horse teeth sampled for strontium isotope analysis came. (Map by Maaike Groot.)

Figure 1

Table 1. Information on the horse teeth selected for strontium isotope analysis and the mean, minimum, and maximum 87Sr/86Sr values, as well as the range.

Figure 2

Table 2. Measurements included in the LSI analysis. Bd: distal breadth; BT: breadth of the trochlea; GL: greatest length; BFp: breadth of the proximal articular surface; BFd: breadth of the distal articular surface; Dp: proximal depth; LA: length of the acetabulum; LAR: length of the acetabulum on the rim; Dd: distal depth; GB: greatest breadth; LmT: length of the medial part of the trochlea tali.

Figure 3

Fig. 2. 87Sr/86Sr laser ablation MC-ICP-MS data for third lower molars from five horses from rural and military sites in the Dutch eastern river area. Individual measurements are shown in grey, with the darker line representing a 10-point moving average. (Figure by the authors.)

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Box plot for horse proportions (out of total NISP for cattle, sheep/goat, horse, and pig). (Figure by Maaike Groot.)

Figure 5

Table 3. Number of sites and mean proportion of horse bones per period and site type.

Figure 6

Table 4. Summary of statistics for horse frequencies. * = p < 0.05; ** = p < 0.01; *** = p < 0.005; N = no significant difference (Mann-Whitney pairwise test). Because there is only one Late Roman consumer site, this site/period has not been included in the statistical analysis.

Figure 7

Fig. 4. Box plots for log size index values for horses from the eastern river area. See Table 5 for the means and the number of measurements per period and Tables 6–8 for the results of statistical testing. (Figure by Maaike Groot.)

Figure 8

Table 5. Numbers of measurements and means for LSI values per period.

Figure 9

Table 6. Summary of statistics for LSI values for width measurements. * = p < 0.05; ** = p < 0.01; *** = p < 0.005; N = no significant difference (Mann-Whitney pairwise test).

Figure 10

Table 7. Summary of statistics for LSI values for length measurements. * = p < 0.05; ** = p < 0.01; *** = p < 0.005; N = no significant difference (Mann-Whitney pairwise test).

Figure 11

Table 8. Summary of statistics for LSI values for depth measurements. * = p < 0.05; ** = p < 0.01; *** = p < 0.005; N = no significant difference (Mann-Whitney pairwise test).