Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:25:08.198Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mechanism and kinetics of early transition metal hydrides, oxides, and chlorides to enhance hydrogen release and uptake properties of MgH2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2015

Dmytro Korablov
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Center for Materials Crystallography (CMC), Interdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Aarhus University, Langelandsgade 140, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
Thomas K. Nielsen
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Center for Materials Crystallography (CMC), Interdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Aarhus University, Langelandsgade 140, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
Flemming Besenbacher
Affiliation:
Interdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO) and Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 120, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
Torben R. Jensen*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Center for Materials Crystallography (CMC), Interdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Aarhus University, Langelandsgade 140, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
*
a) Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: trj@chem.au.dk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Selected hydrides (TiH2, ZrH2), chlorides (VCl3, ScCl3) or oxides (V2O5) utilized as additives facilitating hydrogen release and uptake for magnesium hydride were investigated using mechano-chemical treatment and in-situ synchrotron radiation powder X-ray diffraction studies. The fastest hydrogen desorption and absorption kinetics for MgH2 was observed for a sample with 5 mol% V2O5 at 320 °C. Additional activation of the system (2 cycles, vacuum/p(H2) ~150 bar, 450 °C) leads to significant improvement of the kinetics even at lower temperatures, 270 °C. The observed prolific effect is achieved through the full reduction of vanadium oxides and formation of an efficient vanadium catalyst as nanoparticles and possibly interfacial effects in the MgO/Mg/MgH2/V system introduced during cycling hydrogen release and uptake in hydrogen/dynamic vacuum at 450 °C. Nanostructuring as well as hydrogen permeability via vanadium nanoparticles may improve kinetics and reduce the apparent activation energy for hydrogen release. Thus, the enhancement of hydrogen release/uptake in the MgH2 owe to “in situ” formation of vanadium nanoparticles by reduction of V2O5.

Type
Technical Articles
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 2015 

I. INTRODUCTION

Currently, magnesium hydride is the subject of many scientific studies as a promising material for hydrogen storage. Obstacles to its widespread use are the high decomposition temperature (~300 °C) and the slow kinetics of hydrogen absorption–desorption. Traditionally, the solution to these problems is found in nanostructuring that can be achieved, for example, by mechano-chemical treatment (Huot et al., Reference Huot, Liang, Boily, Van Neste and Schulz1999; Paskevicius et al., Reference Paskevicius, Sheppard and Buckley2010), use of effective catalysts (Schimmel et al., Reference Schimmel, Huot, Chapon, Tichelaar and Mulder2005; Varin et al., Reference Varin, Zbroniec, Polanski and Bystrzycki2011) or by introducing of additives that alter the thermodynamic properties of the system (Jin et al., Reference Jin, Shim, Ahn, Cho and Yi2007a; Cuevas et al., Reference Cuevas, Korablov and Latroche2012). Nanosized metals may have lower melting point or spontaneous alloying as compared with their bulk form (Hirokazu and Kitagawa, Reference Hirokazu and Kitagawa2012). In addition, nanostructuring by mechano-chemical treatment often improve kinetics but may also lead to surface contamination with material from the milling equipment (Pasquini et al., Reference Pasquini, Callini, Brighi, Boscherini, Montone, Jensen, Maurizio, Antisari and Bonetti2011; Huot et al., Reference Huot, Ravnsbæk, Zhang, Cuevas, Latroche and Jensen2013). A remaining challenge is the stabilization of magnesium nanoparticles and preventing agglomeration, sintering, oxidation, and potential side reactions leading to rapid deterioration of material properties upon cycling (Sato and Ishikawa, Reference Sato and Ishikawa2012). Nanoconfinement of magnesium has been investigated and was shown to increase the kinetics for hydrogen release and uptake and may also provide improved thermodynamic properties (Nielsen et al., Reference Nielsen, Manickam, Hirscher, Besenbacher and Jensen2009, Reference Nielsen, Besenbacher and Jensen2011; Paskevicius et al., Reference Paskevicius, Sheppard and Buckley2010; Vajo, Reference Vajo2011).

A wide range of different types of additives including metals, oxides, halides, and hydrides has been considered for possible prolific effects on hydrogen release and uptake. Nanonickel (n-Ni) is well established as efficient catalyst for the Mg/MgH2 system, which acts via the intermediate Mg2NiH4 (Jensen et al., Reference Jensen, Andreasen, Vegge, Andreasen, Stahl, Pedersen, Nielsen, Molenbroek and Besenbacher2006; Varin et al., Reference Varin, Czujko and Wronski2009, Reference Varin, Zbroniec, Polanski and Bystrzycki2011; Pasquini et al., Reference Pasquini, Callini, Brighi, Boscherini, Montone, Jensen, Maurizio, Antisari and Bonetti2011; Callini et al., Reference Callini, Pasquini, Jensen and Bonetti2013). Other metals, e.g., Al, Ti, Cu, Pd may have both a thermodynamic and kinetic effect by forming magnesium containing alloys (Andreasen et al., Reference Andreasen, Sorensen, Burkarl, Moller, Molenbroek, Pedersen, Andreasen, Nielsen and Jensen2005, Reference Andreasen, Sørensen, Burkarl, Møller, Molenbroek, Pedersen, Vegge and Jensen2006; Callini et al., Reference Callini, Pasquini, Rude, Nielsen, Jensen and Bonetti2010). In particular, titanium is relevant because of low costs, lighter weight, and fast kinetics for hydrogen release and uptake for Mg/MgH2. Moreover, magnesium does not form intermetallic compounds with V and Nb (Massalski, Reference Massalski1990). Therefore, both metals are considered as heterogeneous catalysts (Schimmel et al., Reference Schimmel, Huot, Chapon, Tichelaar and Mulder2005).

Transition metal oxides are also good catalysts for enhancement of hydrogen release and uptake e.g., Nb2O5 (Barkhordarian et al., Reference Barkhordarian, Klassen and Bormann2006) and V2O5 (Oelerich et al., Reference Oelerich, Klassen and Bormann2001a, Reference Oelerich, Klassen and Bormann2001b; Jung et al., Reference Jung, Lee and Lee2006). A drawback may be that some metal oxides have a tendency to reduce during cycling hydrogen release and uptake, which leads to the formation of inert magnesium oxide. The detailed mechanism for metal oxides prolific action may be complex and in some cases is not fully understood. An in situ synchrotron radiation powder X-ray diffraction (SR-PXD) investigation of MgH2 and Nb2O5 (8 mol%) revealed reduction of Nb(V) and formation of Mg1− x Nb x O, which may facilitate release and uptake of hydrogen (Nielsen and Jensen, Reference Nielsen and Jensen2012).

Transition metal halides have also been successfully utilized as additives for improving the kinetics of the absorption/desorption of hydrogen in MgH2, e.g., VCl3 and TiCl3 (Malka et al., Reference Malka, Czujko and Bystrzycki2010). Moreover, halides of Fe, Ni, and Nb have also shown attractive catalytic properties (Ivanov et al., Reference Ivanov, Konstanchuk, Bokhonov and Boldyrev2003; Deledda et al., Reference Deledda, Borissova, Poinsignon, Botta, Dornheim and Klassen2005; Bhat et al., Reference Bhat, Rougier, Aymard, Darok, Nazri and Tarascon2006; Kim et al., Reference Kim, Ahn, Jin, Lee, Chung, Shim, Cho and Oh2008; Ma et al., Reference Ma, Kang, Dai, Liang, Fang, Wang, Wang and Cheng2009).

Transition metal oxides and halides may in some cases react with MgH2 or Mg and form other compounds. Currently, there is no clear picture of their mechanism of action and the active compound may not be known (Barkhordarian et al., Reference Barkhordarian, Klassen and Bormann2006; Jin et al., Reference Jin, Shim, Cho and Yi2007b). This has prompted the present investigation of binary early d-block hydrides, oxides, and chlorides used as additives for the Mg/MgH2 system. We utilize in situ SR-PXD to provide a more detailed picture of mechanism for hydrogen release and uptake as well as identification of active compounds in the mixtures.

II. EXPERIMENTAL

A. Sample preparation

Mixtures of MgH2 (98%, Alfa Aesar) with 5 mol% of additive were ball milled under argon atmosphere using tungsten carbide (WC) hard alloy vial (80 ml) and balls (10 mm diameter) in a Fritsch Pulverisette P4 planetary mill. As additives, commercially available chemicals were used: vanadium pentoxide (V2O5, 98 + %, Aldrich), titanium hydride (TiH2, 98%, Aldrich), zirconium hydride (ZrH2, 99%, Aldrich), vanadium chloride (VCl3, 97%, Aldrich), and scandium chloride (ScCl3, 99.9%, Aldrich). The typical mass of each mixture constituted 3 g with 1 : 41 powder-to-ball weight ratio. The milling was performed in time intervals of 30 min at a rotation speed of 300 rpm (Huot et al., Reference Huot, Ravnsbæk, Zhang, Cuevas, Latroche and Jensen2013).

Experimental details regarding samples composition and preparation can be found in Table I. All handling and manipulation of the chemicals were carried out under argon atmosphere in an MBraun Unilab glove box with a recirculation gas purification system and gas/humidity sensors. Oxygen and water levels were kept well below 1 ppm during all operations.

Table I. Composition of the MgH2 + additives samples prepared mechano-chemically.

B. In situ synchrotron radiation powder X-ray diffraction (SR-PXD)

The detailed reaction mechanisms and kinetics of hydrogen release and uptake in MgH2 with different additives were studied by in situ SR-PXD experiments. Data were collected at beamline I711 at the synchrotron MAX II, in the research laboratory MAX-lab, Lund, Sweden using a Mar165 CCD detector. A LaB6 external standard was used to determine sample-detector distance, detector orientation, and the wavelength. The samples were mounted in sapphire single crystal tubes (Al2O3, o.d. 1.09 mm, i.d. 0.79 mm) in an argon-filled glove box (p(O2, H2O) <1 ppm). The sample holder was specially developed for the study of gas/solid reactions and hydrogen pressures were allowed up to 20 MPa and temperatures from room temperature (RT) to 800 °C (Jensen et al., Reference Jensen, Nielsen, Filinchuk, Jorgensen, Cerenius, Gray and Webb2010). The selected wavelength was 0.94608 Å and the X-ray exposure time was 5 s per PXD pattern. Samples for investigation of mechanism and kinetics of hydrogen release and uptake were heated stepwise to fixed temperatures of 270 and 320 °C (15 °C min−1) in a hydrogen pressure of 100–150 bar. The hydrogen pressure was reduced to p(H2) ~10−2 bar (dynamic vacuum) when the fixed temperature was reached and then again increased to 100–150 bar when the sample was fully dehydrogenated (after 15 to 30 min) measuring one full hydrogen release and uptake cycle at each temperature. Selected samples were additionally heated to 450 °C and two extra H2 desorption/absorption cycles were performed. Finally, the samples were cooled to 270 °C and one dehydrogenation was conducted.

All obtained raw images were transformed to two-dimensional powder patterns using the FIT2D program (Hammersley et al., Reference Hammersley, Svensson, Hanfland, Fitch and Hausermann1996), which was also used for calibration using measurements of the standard NIST LaB6 sample. Crystal structure refinements were performed using the Rietveld method implemented in the Fullprof program (Rodríguez-Carvajal, Reference Rodríguez-Carvajal1993). The backgrounds were described by linear interpolation between selected points, while pseudo-Voigt profile functions were used to fit the diffraction peaks. Sequential refinements provide the weight fractions for the compounds present in the sample as a function of time. The extracted normalized curves represent phase formation or decomposition curves as a function of time denoted α(t). These sigmoidal shaped curves can be used for evaluation of the activation process.

The decomposition curves for MgH2 can be fitted well with the equation of shrinking core model:

(1) $$1 - \lpar 1 - \alpha \rpar {^{1/2}}=kt$$

where α is the phase fraction at time t and k is the rate constant (Liang et al., Reference Liang, Huot, Boily and Schulz2000; Varin et al., Reference Varin, Czujko and Wronski2009).

An apparent activation energy, E A, and a pre-factor, A, for the overall reaction can be calculated using Arrhenius law:

(2) $$k=A\, \, {\rm exp\lpar } - {E_A}/RT\rpar $$

where R is the gas constant and T is the absolute temperature.

III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A. Reactions during mechano-chemical and heat treatment

Dispersion of transition metals in Mg/MgH2 system is difficult because of the ductility of the metals. Therefore, binary salt-like oxides, chlorides, and hydrides based on early d-block metals were selected as additives in the present investigation, i.e., V2O5, VCl3, ScCl3, TiH2, and ZrH2.

Figures 1–5 show in situ SR-PXD data for the ball-milled samples S1–S5 (see Table I), respectively. Bragg diffraction peaks of β-, γ-MgH2, and MgO are observed for sample S1 (Figure 1) at RT. There is no observed diffraction from V2O5, which suggests that a redox reaction has occurred during mechano-chemical treatment [see reaction scheme (3)]. Decomposition of MgH2 initiates at 270 °C by decreasing excess hydrogen pressure below equilibrium at this temperature. All γ-MgH2 disappears within <1 min of heating at 270 °C and most of the present β-MgH2 (90%) is decomposed after 10 min (during measurement of 40 PXD patterns). The PXD data show the presence of Mg, MgO, and possibly V at 270 °C. The latter two phases are difficult to distinguish owing to overlapping Bragg reflections.

(3) $$5{\rm Mg}{{\rm H}_ 2}+{{\rm V}_ 2}{{\rm O}_ 5} \to 2\, {\rm V}+5{\rm MgO}+5{{\rm H}_ 2}$$

Figure 1. In-situ SR-PXD data measured for sample MgH2–V2O5 (S1) heated under p(H2) = 100 bar from RT to 270 °C (15 °C min−1) and subsequently dehydrogenated and hydrogenated at this temperature applying alternately p(H2) = 10−2 and 100–150 bar (λ = 0.946 08 Å).

Figure 2. In-situ SR-PXD data measured for sample MgH2–ZrH2 (S2) heated under p(H2) = 100 bar from RT to 270 °C (15 °C min−1) and subsequently dehydrogenated at this temperature applying p(H2) = 10−2 (λ = 0.946 08 Å).

Figure 3. In-situ SR-PXD data measured for sample MgH2–TiH2 (S3) heated under p(H2) = 100 bar from RT to 270 °C (15 °C min−1) and subsequently cycled at this temperature applying alternately p(H2) = 10−2 and 100–150 bar (λ = 0.946 08 Å).

Figure 4. In-situ SR-PXD data measured for sample MgH2–ScCl3 (S4) heated under p(H2) = 100 bar from RT to 270 °C (15 °C min−1) and subsequently cycled at this temperature applying alternately p(H2) = 10−2 and 100–150 bar (λ = 0.946 08 Å).

Figure 5. In-situ SR-PXD data measured for sample MgH2-VCl3 (S5) heated under p(H2) = 100 bar from RT to 270 °C (15 °C min−1) and subsequently cycled at this temperature applying alternately p(H2) = 10−2 and 100–150 bar (λ = 0.946 08 Å).

PXD patterns of the samples S2 and S3 measured at RT reveal diffracted intensities from the reactants only, i.e., no reaction has occurred between ZrH2 or TiH2 and MgH2. Notice that there is no observed diffraction from MgO in sample S2 and S3. This indicates that the presence of MgO in S1 is because of a reaction between V2O5 and MgH2. Magnesium metal formation in both samples, S2 and S3, initiates at 270 °C when the pressure is reduced.

The as-milled chloride doped sample S4 reveals diffraction from MgH2 and scandium(II) hydride ScH2 and no diffraction from the additive, ScCl3. This indicates that a redox reaction has occurred during ball-milling [see reaction scheme (4)]. Formation of magnesium initiates when the pressure is reduced at 270 °C. Formation of MgCl2 is observed during the rehydrogenation at p(H2) = 100 bar.

(4) $$5{\rm Mg}{{\rm H}_ 2}+{\rm ScC}{{\rm l}_ 3} \to {\rm MgC}{{\rm l}_ 2}+{\rm Sc}{{\rm H}_ 2}+0.5{{\rm H}_2}$$

Sample S5 (MgH2 − VCl3) behaves in a similar way, i.e., no observation of VCl3 after milling, crystallization of MgCl2 during rehydrogenation (see Figure 5). Furthermore, unidentified reflection reveals a continuous change in composition at 2θ = 24.9–25.4° under vacuum.

B. Evaluation of additives kinetic effect

In situ SR-PXD data are used to investigate the effect of selected early d-block hydrides, oxides, and chlorides additives on the mechanism of hydrogen release and uptake in magnesium hydride system at 270 °C. The diffracted intensities from MgH2 are integrated, normalized, and converted to phase fraction and used to visualize decreasing amounts of MgH2 during dehydrogenation reactions (Figure 6). At 270 °C the weakest kinetic effect for hydrogen desorption is provided by ScCl3 (S4) and TiH2 (S3) and the strongest influence is provided by VCl3 (S5) and V2O5 (S1). In the early stages of MgH2 decomposition V2O5 demonstrates the fastest kinetics, which is somewhat slowed down in the late stage of the decomposition. In contrast, the effect from VCl3 additive is also significant in the late stage of the decomposition. Zirconium hydride (S2) has an intermediate kinetic effect. A similar analysis of additives effect was also performed at higher temperature of 320 °C and the results are presented in Figure 7. The time scale for these experiments is clearly shorter as compared with those performed at 270 °C. In addition, the additives ability to accelerate the reaction kinetics follows the sequence: ScCl3 < TiH2 < ZrH2 < VCl3 < V2O5. These experiments reveal that the effect of increasing temperatures on the acceleration of reaction rate is more pronounced than the different additives effect. It should be emphasized that commercial MgH2 ball-milled without additives in the same conditions does not desorb hydrogen at 270 nor at 320 °C. Slight yield of hydrogen begins to be observed only at temperatures above 350 °C.

Figure 6. (color online) Integrated normalized diffracted intensities for samples S1–S5 showing changes in the relative amount of MgH2 at 270 °C as a function of time.

Figure 7. (color online) Integrated normalized diffracted intensities for samples S1–S5 showing changes in the relative amount of MgH2 at 320 °C as a function of time.

C. Activation of magnesium hydride via a chemical reaction

Analysis of the additives effect (Section B) revealed that the best results were obtained using the addition of V2O5. Here we further analyse the mechanism for this effect. Bragg diffraction peaks of β-, γ-MgH2 and MgO are observed for MgH2–V2O5 (S1) (see Figure 1), at RT. There is no observed diffraction from V2O5, which suggest that a redox reaction has occurred during mechano-chemical treatment [see reaction scheme (3)]. To crystallize possible reaction products the same sample was heated to 450 °C and 2 cycles of hydrogen release and uptake were conducted (see Figure 8). Diffraction peaks from V2H are clearly observed at 2θ = 24.5° and 35.9° in the hydrogenated state when the temperature reaches 450 °C and for V in the dehydrogenated state at 2θ = 25.4° and 36.4°. This leads to the splitting of the peak previously assigned to MgO and V, at 2θ ≈ 26° in Figure 1. Apparently, the heating procedure fully reduced the possibly remaining V2O5 and facilitated crystallization of V2H/V. The experiment was continued using the same sample (see Figure 9), the temperature was decreased to 270 °C and one dehydrogenation was conducted similar to what is shown in Figure 1. Presence of vanadium and vanadium hydride is more clearly observed in Figure 9 as compared with Figure 8 and during dehydrogenation diffraction peaks from V2H (at 2θ = 24.4°) continuously change position to 2θ = 25.5° because of the release of hydrogen and formation of V.

Figure 8. In-situ SR-PXD data of the activation process for sample MgH2–V2O5 (S1) heated under p(H2) = 100 bar from 320 to 450 °C (15 °C min−1) and subsequently cycled at this temperature applying alternately p(H2) = 10−2 and 100–150 bar (λ = 0.946 08 Å).

Figure 9. In-situ SR-PXD data of post-activation desorption measured for sample MgH2–V2O5 (S1) cooled from 450 to 270 °C under p(H2) = 100 bar (15 °C min−1) where the pressure was decreased to p(H2) = 10−2 bar (λ = 0.946 08 Å).

The activation procedure, i.e., cycling at 450 °C clearly improves the desorption kinetics. This is illustrated in Figure 10 where extracted decomposition curves for MgH2 are shown using data from Figures 1 and 9. After the activation process (Figure 8) the release of hydrogen from MgH2 is both faster and more complete. This may be related to the formation of more V2H/V in the sample and the fact that the hydrogen permeability of vanadium is large and exceeds that of palladium (Dolan, Reference Dolan2010). It is known that Nb and V based alloys are promising membranes materials, which currently are developed instead of Pd based alloys (Yukawa et al., Reference Yukawa, Nambu and Matsumoto2012). Therefore, the V2H/V system may be the active catalytic component for the MgH2–V2O5 system.

Figure 10. (color online) Comparison of the kinetic curves for MgH2 decomposition at 270 °C before and after the activation of MgH2–V2O5 (S1).

D. Apparent activation energy for the MgH2 decomposition

The decomposition curves for MgH2–V2O5 (S1) can be fitted well using the contracting surface model (two-dimensional growth) (Bamford and Tipper, Reference Bamford, Tipper, Brown, Dollimore and Galwey1980), e.g., kinetic shrinking core model, which suggests that hydrogen desorption is interface controlled (Liang et al., Reference Liang, Huot, Boily and Schulz2000; Varin et al., Reference Varin, Czujko and Wronski2009).

An Arrhenius plot of the natural logarithm to the rate constant as a function of inverse temperature is provided in Figure 11. The calculated apparent activation energy E A = 43 kJ mol−1 is obtained for the MgH2–V2O5 sample S1 after milling. This value compares well to the activation energy for long range hydrogen diffusion in bulk Mg determined from experimental data to be E A = 40.2 kJ mol−1 (Renner and Grabke, Reference Renner and Grabke1978). For the fully activated sample S1 the compounds V/V2H are identified to be the active catalytic compounds, which facilitate hydrogen release. The in situ SR-PXD data also allow to extract an apparent activation energy for the activated sample, E A = 34 kJ mol−1 (see Figure 11). These measured values are low, in particular when compared with that for bulk (unmilled) and air-exposed MgH2, E A = 300 kJ mol−1 (Jensen et al., Reference Jensen, Andreasen, Vegge, Andreasen, Stahl, Pedersen, Nielsen, Molenbroek and Besenbacher2006). Apparent activation energies of E A = 52 and 120 kJ mol−1 are measured for mechano-chemically treated MgH2 with and without vanadium (5 mol%) as additive (Liang et al., Reference Liang, Huot, Boily, Van Neste and Schulz1999b, Reference Liang, Huot, Boily and Schulz2000).

Figure 11. (color online) Arrhenius plot of the kinetic data for dehydrogenation of MgH2–V2O5 (S1).

Thus, this kinetic analysis reveals that in situ synthesis of small particles of V/V2H in the sample during cycling appears to have a stronger catalytic effect on hydrogen release and uptake in magnesium/magnesium hydride system. This may be because of a more uniform distribution of catalytic active particles compared with mechano-chemically prepared samples of MgH2–V. There are inherent difficulties with obtaining uniform distribution of ductile metals in MgH2 in contrast to brittle oxides that tend to form more homogenous distributed samples. The drawback is that considerable amounts of inert MgO are formed during reduction of V2O5 in the MgH2–V2O5 system.

E. On the catalytic properties of vanadium pentoxide and vanadium metal

There are several studies that report high catalytic activity of V2O5 for release and uptake in magnesium hydride (Oelerich et al., Reference Oelerich, Klassen and Bormann2001a, Reference Oelerich, Klassen and Bormann2001b; Barkhordarian et al., Reference Barkhordarian, Klassen and Bormann2006; Jung et al., Reference Jung, Lee and Lee2006). Vanadium(V) oxide, similar to niobium(V) oxide, is readily reduced in contact with hydrogen or mechano-chemically treated with MgH2 (Jung et al., Reference Jung, Lee and Lee2006; Nielsen and Jensen, Reference Nielsen and Jensen2012). Several lower oxides may act as intermediates during the formation of MgO. The final product is shown here to be vanadium, which also participate in hydrogen release and uptake via V/V2H system.

As mentioned above vanadium does not form alloy or intermetallic compounds with Mg (Schimmel et al., Reference Schimmel, Huot, Chapon, Tichelaar and Mulder2005) thus it can act as a pure catalyst. MgH2-5 mol%V composite desorbs hydrogen at 473 K (under vacuum) and re-absorbs hydrogen rapidly even at RT (Liang et al., Reference Liang, Huot, Boily, Van Neste and Schulz1999b). The desorption rate was the highest for this mixture and decreased in the following order of additives: Ti, Mn, Fe, and Ni (Liang et al., Reference Liang, Huot, Boily, Van Neste and Schulz1999a).

Moreover, MgH2-5 mol%V system has the fastest kinetics for hydrogen release and uptake in magnesium hydride in comparison with Ti and is similar to Nb additive (Charbonnier et al., Reference Charbonnier, de Rango, Fruchart, Miraglia, Pontonnier, Rivoirard, Skryabina and Vulliet2004). Mg-10 wt.%V system exhibits the highest rate of hydrogen desorption and shows the lowest activation energy among Y and Zr additives (Czujko et al., Reference Czujko, Varin, Chiu and Wronski2006). In addition, vanadium itself reversibly absorbs and desorbs 2.3 wt% of hydrogen at RT, which is also larger than that of the known alloys, LaNi5, FeTi (Varin et al., Reference Varin, Czujko and Wronski2009; Nakamura et al., Reference Nakamura, Kato, Takamatsu, Fuura, Oosawa and Tsunokake2012).

IV. CONCLUSION

Using the same conditions for the synthesis (mechano-chemical treatment) and evaluation of properties (hydrogen-vacuum cycling) a comparative analysis was carried out and the best from the studied catalysts for desorption/absorption of hydrogen for commercial powder MgH2 was determined. It was found that the fastest kinetics at 320 °C shows the sample with additive of 5 mol% V2O5. Additional activation of the system (2 cycles at 450 °C) leads to the significant improvement and acceleration of kinetics even at lower 270 °C temperature. Observed effect is achieved through the full reduction of vanadium oxides, the formation of new efficient catalyst in the form of ultrafine particles of vanadium and purification of interface MgH2/V in the process of heating to 450 °C in dynamic vacuum. This reduces the apparent activation energy of hydrogen desorption below the values of the activation energy of hydrogen diffusion in Mg, owing to the joint effect of nanostructuring and high hydrogen permeability of vanadium catalyst, which strongly bound to the surface of the MgH2 crystallites. Thus the real catalyst for the hydrogen release/uptake in the MgH2 is nanoparticles of pure vanadium obtained by the full reduction of V2O5 that was used originally.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors acknowledge funding for this research from the Danish Research Council for Natural Sciences (Danscatt). Moreover, the work was supported by the Danish National Research Foundation (Centre for Materials Crystallography), the Danish Strategic Research Council (Centre for Energy Materials), and the Carlsberg Foundation and the Swedish Research Council. The access to beam time at the MAX II synchrotron, Lund, Sweden in the research laboratory MAX-lab is gratefully acknowledged. Support from EU COST action MP1103 is also acknowledged.

References

Andreasen, A., Sorensen, M. B., Burkarl, R., Moller, B., Molenbroek, A. M., Pedersen, A. S., Andreasen, J. W., Nielsen, M. M., and Jensen, T. R. (2005). “Interaction of hydrogen with an Mg-Al alloy,” J. Alloys Compd. 404, 323326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreasen, A., Sørensen, M. B., Burkarl, R., Møller, B., Molenbroek, A. M., Pedersen, A. S., Vegge, T., and Jensen, T. R. (2006). “Dehydrogenation kinetics of air-exposed MgH2/Mg2Cu and MgH2/MgCu2 studied with in situ X-ray powder diffraction,” Appl. Phys. A Mater 82, 515521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamford, C. H. and Tipper, C. F. H. (1980). “Theory of solid state reaction kinetics,” in Comprehensive Chemical Kinetics, Brown, M. E., Dollimore, D., and Galwey, A. K., eds. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands), Vol. 22, pp. 41113.Google Scholar
Barkhordarian, G., Klassen, T., and Bormann, R. (2006). “Catalytic mechanism of transition-metal compounds on Mg hydrogen sorption reaction,” J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 1102011024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhat, V. V., Rougier, A., Aymard, L., Darok, X., Nazri, G., and Tarascon, J. M. (2006). “Catalytic activity of oxides and halides on hydrogen storage of MgH2 ,” J. Power Sources 159, 107110.Google Scholar
Callini, E., Pasquini, L., Rude, L. H., Nielsen, T. K., Jensen, T. R., and Bonetti, E. (2010). “Hydrogen storage and phase transformations in Mg-Pd nanoparticles,” J. Appl. Phys. 108, 073513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callini, E., Pasquini, L., Jensen, T. R., and Bonetti, E. (2013). “Hydrogen storage properties of Mg-Ni nanoparticles,” Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 38, 1220712212.Google Scholar
Charbonnier, J., de Rango, P., Fruchart, D., Miraglia, S., Pontonnier, L., Rivoirard, S., Skryabina, N., and Vulliet, P. (2004). “Hydrogenation of transition element additives (Ti, V) during ball milling of magnesium hydride,” J. Alloys Compd. 383, 205208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuevas, F., Korablov, D., and Latroche, M. (2012). “Synthesis, structural and hydrogenation properties of Mg-rich MgH2-TiH2 nanocomposites prepared by reactive ball milling under hydrogen gas,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14, 12001211.Google Scholar
Czujko, T., Varin, R. A., Chiu, C., and Wronski, Z. (2006). “Investigation of the hydrogen desorption properties of Mg + 10wt.%X (X = V, Y, Zr) submicrocrystalline composites,” J. Alloys Compd. 414, 240247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deledda, S., Borissova, A., Poinsignon, C., Botta, W. J., Dornheim, M., and Klassen, T. (2005). “H-sorption in MgH2 nanocomposites containing Fe or Ni with fluorine,” J. Alloys Compd. 404–406, 409412.Google Scholar
Dolan, M. D. (2010). “Non-Pd BCC alloy membranes for industrial hydrogen separation,” J. Membr. Sci. 362, 1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammersley, A. P., Svensson, S. O., Hanfland, M., Fitch, A. N., and Hausermann, D. (1996). “Two-dimensional detector software: from real detector to idealised image or two-theta scan,” High Press. Res. 14, 235248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirokazu, K. and Kitagawa, H. (2012). “Nanostructured materials for hydrogen storage,” Int. Symp. on Metal-Hydrogen Systems, Kyoto, Japan, p. 187.Google Scholar
Huot, J., Liang, G., Boily, S., Van Neste, A., and Schulz, R. (1999). “Structural study and hydrogen sorption kinetics of ball-milled magnesium hydride,” J. Alloys Compd. 293, 495500.Google Scholar
Huot, J., Ravnsbæk, D. B., Zhang, J., Cuevas, F., Latroche, M., and Jensen, T. R. (2013). “Mechanochemical synthesis of hydrogen storage materials,” Progr. Mater. Sci. 58, 3075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanov, E., Konstanchuk, I., Bokhonov, B., and Boldyrev, V. (2003). “Hydrogen interaction with mechanically alloyed magnesium-salt composite materials,” J. Alloys Compd. 359, 320325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, T. R., Andreasen, A., Vegge, T., Andreasen, J. W., Stahl, K., Pedersen, A. S., Nielsen, M. M., Molenbroek, A. M., and Besenbacher, F. (2006). “Dehydrogenation kinetics of pure and nickel-doped magnesium hydride investigated by in situ time-resolved powder X-ray diffraction,” Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 31, 20522062.Google Scholar
Jensen, T. R., Nielsen, T. K., Filinchuk, Y., Jorgensen, J. E., Cerenius, Y., Gray, E. M., and Webb, C. J. (2010). “Versatile in situ powder X-ray diffraction cells for solid-gas investigations,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 43, 14561463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jin, S.-A., Shim, J.-H., Ahn, J.-P., Cho, Y. W., and Yi, K.-W. (2007a). “Improvement in hydrogen sorption kinetics of MgH2 with Nb hydride catalyst,” Acta Mater. 55, 50735079.Google Scholar
Jin, S. A., Shim, J. H., Cho, Y. W., and Yi, K. W. (2007b). “Dehydrogenation and hydrogenation characteristics of MgH2 with transition metal fluorides,” J. Power Sources 172, 859862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, K. S., Lee, E. Y., and Lee, K. S. (2006). “Catalytic effects of metal oxide on hydrogen absorption of magnesium metal hydride,” J. Alloys Compd. 421, 179184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. W., Ahn, J. P., Jin, S. A., Lee, S. H., Chung, H. S., Shim, J. H., Cho, Y. W., and Oh, K. H. (2008). “Microstructural evolution of NbF5-doped MgH2 exhibiting fast hydrogen sorption kinetics,” J. Power Sources 178, 373378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, G., Huot, J., Boily, S., Van Neste, A., and Schulz, R. (1999a). “Catalytic effect of transition metals on hydrogen sorption in nanocrystalline ball milled MgH2–Tm (Tm = Ti, V, Mn, Fe and Ni) systems,” J. Alloys Compd. 292, 247252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, G., Huot, J., Boily, S., Van Neste, A., and Schulz, R. (1999b). “Hydrogen storage properties of the mechanically milled MgH2–V nanocomposite,” J. Alloys Compd. 291, 295299.Google Scholar
Liang, G., Huot, J., Boily, S., and Schulz, R. (2000). “Hydrogen desorption kinetics of a mechanically milled MgH2 + 5at.%V nanocomposite,” J. Alloys Compd. 305, 239245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, L. P., Kang, X. D., Dai, H. B., Liang, Y., Fang, Z. Z., Wang, P. J., Wang, P., and Cheng, H. M. (2009). “Superior catalytic effect of TiF3 over TiCl3 in improving the hydrogen sorption kinetics of MgH2: catalytic role of fluorine anion,” Acta Mater. 57, 22502258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malka, I. E., Czujko, T., and Bystrzycki, J. (2010). “Catalytic effect of halide additives ball milled with magnesium hydride,” Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 35, 17061712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massalski, T. B. (1990). Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams (ASM International, Materials Park, OH, USA).Google Scholar
Nakamura, J., Kato, N., Takamatsu, Y., Fuura, T., Oosawa, M., and Tsunokake, S. (2012). “Hydrogen storage properties of the Ti-V-Cr-Fe alloy used vanadium obtained by thermite reaction,” Int. Symp. on Metal-Hydrogen Systems, Kyoto, Japan, p. 121.Google Scholar
Nielsen, T. K. and Jensen, T. R. (2012). “MgH2-Nb2O5 investigated by in situ synchrotron X-ray diffraction,” Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 37, 1340913416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, T. K., Manickam, K., Hirscher, M., Besenbacher, F., and Jensen, T. R. (2009). “Confinement of MgH2 nanoclusters within nanoporous aerogel scaffold materials,” ACS Nano 3, 35213528.Google Scholar
Nielsen, T. K., Besenbacher, F., and Jensen, T. R. (2011). “Nanoconfined hydrides for energy storage,” Nanoscale 3, 20862098.Google Scholar
Oelerich, W., Klassen, T., and Bormann, R. (2001a). “Comparison of the catalytic effects of V, V2O5, VN, and VC on the hydrogen sorption of nanocrystalline Mg,” J. Alloys Compd. 322, L5L9.Google Scholar
Oelerich, W., Klassen, T., and Bormann, R. (2001b). “Metal oxides as catalysts for improved hydrogen sorption in nanocrystalline Mg-based materials,” J. Alloys Compd. 315, 237242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paskevicius, M., Sheppard, D. A., and Buckley, C. E. (2010). “Thermodynamic changes in mechanochemically synthesized magnesium hydride nanoparticles,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 50775083.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pasquini, L., Callini, E., Brighi, M., Boscherini, F., Montone, A., Jensen, T. R., Maurizio, C., Antisari, M. V., and Bonetti, E. (2011). “Magnesium nanoparticles with transition metal decoration for hydrogen storage,” J. Nanopart. Res. 13, 57275737.Google Scholar
Renner, J. and Grabke, H. J. (1978). “Determination of diffusion coefficients in the hydriding of alloys,” Mater. Res. Adv. Tech. 69, 639642.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Carvajal, J. (1993). “Recent advances in magnetic structure determination by neutron powder diffraction,” Physica B 192, 5569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sato, M. and Ishikawa, S. (2012). “Reversible multi step hydrogen absorption and desorption by Mg12Zn13,” Int. Symp. on Metal-Hydrogen Systems, Kyoto, Japan, p. 100.Google Scholar
Schimmel, H. G., Huot, J., Chapon, L. C., Tichelaar, F. D., and Mulder, F. M. (2005). “Hydrogen cycling of niobium and vanadium catalyzed nanostructured magnesium,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 1434814354.Google Scholar
Vajo, J. J. (2011). “Influence of nano-confinement on the thermodynamics and dehydrogenation kinetics of metal hydrides,” Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 15, 5261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varin, R. A., Czujko, T. and Wronski, Z. S. (2009). Nanomaterials for Solid State Hydrogen Storage (Springer, New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varin, R. A., Zbroniec, L., Polanski, M., and Bystrzycki, J. (2011). “A review of recent advances on the effects of microstructural refinement and nano-catalytic additives on the hydrogen storage properties of metal and complex hydrides,” Energies 4, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yukawa, H., Nambu, T., and Matsumoto, Y. (2012). “Hydrogen solubility and permeability of V-W-Mo alloy membrane for hydrogen separation and purification,” Int. Symp. on Metal-Hydrogen Systems, Kyoto, Japan, p. 426.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table I. Composition of the MgH2 + additives samples prepared mechano-chemically.

Figure 1

Figure 1. In-situ SR-PXD data measured for sample MgH2–V2O5 (S1) heated under p(H2) = 100 bar from RT to 270 °C (15 °C min−1) and subsequently dehydrogenated and hydrogenated at this temperature applying alternately p(H2) = 10−2 and 100–150 bar (λ = 0.946 08 Å).

Figure 2

Figure 2. In-situ SR-PXD data measured for sample MgH2–ZrH2 (S2) heated under p(H2) = 100 bar from RT to 270 °C (15 °C min−1) and subsequently dehydrogenated at this temperature applying p(H2) = 10−2 (λ = 0.946 08 Å).

Figure 3

Figure 3. In-situ SR-PXD data measured for sample MgH2–TiH2 (S3) heated under p(H2) = 100 bar from RT to 270 °C (15 °C min−1) and subsequently cycled at this temperature applying alternately p(H2) = 10−2 and 100–150 bar (λ = 0.946 08 Å).

Figure 4

Figure 4. In-situ SR-PXD data measured for sample MgH2–ScCl3 (S4) heated under p(H2) = 100 bar from RT to 270 °C (15 °C min−1) and subsequently cycled at this temperature applying alternately p(H2) = 10−2 and 100–150 bar (λ = 0.946 08 Å).

Figure 5

Figure 5. In-situ SR-PXD data measured for sample MgH2-VCl3 (S5) heated under p(H2) = 100 bar from RT to 270 °C (15 °C min−1) and subsequently cycled at this temperature applying alternately p(H2) = 10−2 and 100–150 bar (λ = 0.946 08 Å).

Figure 6

Figure 6. (color online) Integrated normalized diffracted intensities for samples S1–S5 showing changes in the relative amount of MgH2 at 270 °C as a function of time.

Figure 7

Figure 7. (color online) Integrated normalized diffracted intensities for samples S1–S5 showing changes in the relative amount of MgH2 at 320 °C as a function of time.

Figure 8

Figure 8. In-situ SR-PXD data of the activation process for sample MgH2–V2O5 (S1) heated under p(H2) = 100 bar from 320 to 450 °C (15 °C min−1) and subsequently cycled at this temperature applying alternately p(H2) = 10−2 and 100–150 bar (λ = 0.946 08 Å).

Figure 9

Figure 9. In-situ SR-PXD data of post-activation desorption measured for sample MgH2–V2O5 (S1) cooled from 450 to 270 °C under p(H2) = 100 bar (15 °C min−1) where the pressure was decreased to p(H2) = 10−2 bar (λ = 0.946 08 Å).

Figure 10

Figure 10. (color online) Comparison of the kinetic curves for MgH2 decomposition at 270 °C before and after the activation of MgH2–V2O5 (S1).

Figure 11

Figure 11. (color online) Arrhenius plot of the kinetic data for dehydrogenation of MgH2–V2O5 (S1).