Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:27:47.703Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2020

Markus Hinterleitner
Markus Hinterleitner
Affiliation:
Brown University, Rhode Island

Summary

A summary is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Chapter
Information
Policy Controversies and Political Blame Games , pp. 234 - 244
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/

References

Adam, C., Hurka, S., Knill, C., & Steinebach, Y. (2019). Policy Accumulation and the Democratic Responsiveness Trap. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adut, A. (2008). On Scandal: Moral Disturbances in Society, Politics and Art. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aebersold, P. (2011). Schweizerisches Jugendstrafrecht (2nd ed.). Bern: Stämpfli.Google Scholar
Allern, S., & von Sikorski, C. (2018). Political Scandals as a Democratic Challenge: From Important Revelations to Provocations, Trivialities, and Neglect – Introduction. International Journal of Communication, 12(2018), 3014–3023.Google Scholar
Ansell, C. (2019). The Protective State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bach, T., & Wegrich, K. (2016). Regulatory reform, accountability and blame in public service delivery: The public transport crisis in Berlin. In Christensen, T. & Lægreid, P. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook to Accountability and Welfare State Reforms in Europe (pp. 223–236). Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Bache, I., Bartle, I., Flinders, M., & Marsden, G. (2015). Blame Games and Climate Change: Accountability, Multi-Level Governance and Carbon Management. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 17(1), 64–88.Google Scholar
Barberis, P. (1998). The New Public Management and a New Accountability. Public Administration, 76(3), 451–470.Google Scholar
Barker, A. (1994). The Upturned Stone: Political Scandals and Their Investigation Processes in Twenty Democracies. Crime, Law and Social Change, 21(4), 337–373.Google Scholar
Bates, G. L., Hutchinson, D., Robertson, T. M., Wadsworth, A. P., & Watson, R. P. (2002). Identifying the Cause of the Child Support Agency’s Problems: A Case of New Public Management Failure or an Issue of Inapt Accountability? Retrieved from www.childsupportanalysis.co.uk/assets/cause_of_the_csas_problems.pdf.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (2009). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bawn, K., Cohen, M., Karol, D., et al. (2012). A Theory of Political Parties: Groups, Policy Demands and Nominations in American Politics. Perspectives on Politics, 10(3), 571–597.Google Scholar
Béland, D. (2010). Reconsidering Policy Feedback: How Policies Affect Politics. Administration & Society, 42(5), 568–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, A., & Elman, C. (2006). Complex Causal Relations and Case Study Methods: The Example of Path Dependence. Political Analysis, 14(3), 250–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, J. M. (2002). Validity and Reliability Issues in Elite Interviewing. PS: Political Science & Politics, 35(4), 679–682.Google Scholar
Bevan, G., & Hood, C. (2006). What’s Measured Is What Matters: Targets and Gaming in the English Public Health Care System. Public Administration, 84(3), 517–538.Google Scholar
Beyme, K. von. (2013). Die parlamentarische Demokratie: Entstehung und Funktionsweise 1789–1999. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Bijl-Schwab, B. (2017). Kulturpolitik. In Knoepfel, P., Papadopoulos, Y., Sciarini, P., Vatter, A., & Häusermann, S. (Eds.), Handbuch der Schweizer Politik (6th ed., pp. 855–888). Zurich: NZZ Libro.Google Scholar
Birkland, T. A. (1998). Focusing Events, Mobilization, and Agenda Setting. Journal of Public Policy, 18(01), 53–74.Google Scholar
Blyth, M. (2013). Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boin, A., Hart, J., McConnell, A., & Preston, T. (2010). Leadership Style, Crisis Response and Blame Management: The Case of Hurricane Katrina. Public Administration, 88(3), 706–723.Google Scholar
Boin, A., McConnell, A., & ‘t Hart, P. (Eds.). (2008). Governing after Crisis: The Politics of Investigation, Accountability and Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boin, A., ‘t Hart, P., Stern, E., & Sundelius, B. (2009a). The Politics of Crisis Management: Public Leadership under Pressure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boin, A., ‘t Hart, P., & McConnell, A. (2009b). Crisis Exploitation: Political and Policy Impacts of Framing Contests. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(1), 81–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boswell, J., Corbett, J., Dommett, K., et al. (2018). State of the Field. European Journal of Political Research, 54(1), 78.Google Scholar
Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovens, M., & ‘t Hart, P. (2016). Revisiting the Study of Policy Failures. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(5), 653–666.Google Scholar
Brändström, A. (2015). Crisis Accountability: Ministerial Resignations in Sweden. Scandinavian Political Studies, 38(3), 301–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brändström, A., & Kuipers, S. (2003). From ‘Normal Incidents’ to Political Crises: Understanding the Selective Politicization of Policy Failures. Government and Opposition, 38(3), 279–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busuioc, M., & Lodge, M. (2016). The Reputational Basis of Public Accountability. Governance, 29(2), 247–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A. L. (2012). Policy Makes Mass Politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 15, 333–351.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. L., & Hall, J. A. (2017). The Paradox of Vulnerability: States, Nationalism, and the Financial Crisis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Capoccia, G. (2016). When Do Institutions “Bite”? Historical Institutionalism and the Politics of Institutional Change. Comparative Political Studies, 49(8), 1095–1127.Google Scholar
Chen, F., & Stevens, R. (2017). Applying Lessons from Behavioral Economics to Increase Flu Vaccination Rates. Health Promotion International, 32(6), 1067–1073.Google ScholarPubMed
Collier, D., LaPorte, J., & Seawright, J. (2012). Putting Typologies to Work: Concept Formation, Measurement, and Analytic Rigor. Political Research Quarterly, 65(1), 217–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, R. A. (1965). Reflections on Opposition in Western Democracies. Government and Opposition, 1(1), 7–24.Google Scholar
Edelman, M. J. (1988). Constructing the Political Spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Elliott, D., & McGuinness, M. (2002). Public Inquiry: Panacea or Placebo? Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 10(1), 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (1994). Presidential Lightning Rods: The Politics of Blame Avoidance. Studies in Government and Public Policy. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Elman, C. (2005). Explanatory Typologies in Qualitative Studies of International Politics. International Organization, 59(2), 293–326.Google Scholar
Entman, R. M. (2012). Scandal and Silence: Media Responses to Presidential Misconduct. Cambridge; Malden, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
Falleti, T. G., & Lynch, J. F. (2009). Context and Causal Mechanisms in Political Analysis. Comparative Political Studies, 42(9), 1143–1166.Google Scholar
Falleti, T. G., & Mahoney, J. (2015). The comparative sequential method. In Mahoney, J. & Thelen, K. A. (Eds.), Strategies for Social Inquiry. Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis (pp. 211–239). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, J. (2012). “… I Take Political Responsibility!”: The Theoretical and Empirical Relation between Ministerial Responsibility and Ministerial Resignations in Germany. Public Administration, 90(3), 600–621.Google Scholar
Flinders, M. (2005). The Politics of Public–Private Partnerships. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 7(2), 215–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flinders, M. (2014). Explaining Democratic Disaffection: Closing the Expectations Gap. Governance, 27(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
Flinders, M., & Buller, J. (2006). Depoliticisation: Principles, Tactics and Tools. British Politics, 1(3), 293–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, G. P. (1985). National Styles and Policy Sectors: Explaining Structured Variation. Journal of Public Policy, 5(4), 467–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. BCSIA Studies in International Security. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gerring, J., & Yesnowitz, J. (2006). A Normative Turn in Political Science? Polity, 38(1), 101–133.Google Scholar
Goertz, G. (2006). Social Science Concepts: A User’s Guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodhart, M. (2017). Interpreting Responsibility Politically. Journal of Political Philosophy, 25(2), 173–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, J. S. (2004). Privatizing Risk without Privatizing the Welfare State: The Hidden Politics of Social Policy Retrenchment in the United States. American Political Science Review, 98(2), 243–260.Google Scholar
Hacker, J. S., & Pierson, P. (2014). After the “Master Theory”: Downs, Schattschneider, and the Rebirth of Policy-Focused Analysis. Perspectives on Politics, 12(03), 643–662.Google Scholar
Hacker, J. S., Pierson, P., & Thelen, K. A. (2015). Drift and conversion: Hidden faces of institutional change. In Mahoney, J. & Thelen, K. A. (Eds.), Strategies for Social Inquiry. Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis (pp. 180–208). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, E. M., Haggard, S., Lake, D. A., & Victor, D. G. (2017). The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations. International Organization, 71(S1), S1–S31.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, E. M., Hughes, D. A., & Victor, D. G. (2013). The Cognitive Revolution and the Political Psychology of Elite Decision Making. Perspectives on Politics, 11(2), 368–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P. A. (2016). Politics as a process structured in space and time. In Fioretos, O., Falleti, T. G., & Sheingate, A. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing Media Systems. Communication, Society, and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hansson, S. (2015). Calculated Overcommunication: Strategic Uses of Prolixity, Irrelevance, and Repetition in Administrative Language. Journal of Pragmatics, 84(July), 172–188.Google Scholar
Hansson, S. (2018a). The Discursive Micro-Politics of Blame Avoidance: Unpacking the Language of Government Blame Games. Policy Sciences, 51(4), 545–564.Google Scholar
Hansson, S. (2018b). Defensive Semiotic Strategies in Government: A Multimodal Study of Blame Avoidance. Social Semiotics, 28(4), 472–493.Google Scholar
Harlow, C. (1999). Accountability, New Public Management, and the Problems of the Child Support Agency. Journal of Law and Society, 26(2), 150–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, C. (2011). Ideas and the construction of interests. In Béland, D. & Cox, R. H. (Eds.), Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research (pp. 65–82). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heclo, H. (1974). Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden: From Relief to Income Maintenance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hetherington, M. J. (2009). Review Article: Putting Polarization in Perspective. British Journal of Political Science, 39(02), 413–448.Google Scholar
Hinterleitner, M. (2017). Reconciling Perspectives on Blame Avoidance Behaviour. Political Studies Review, 15(2), 243–254.Google Scholar
Hinterleitner, M. (2018). Policy Failures, Blame Games and Changes to Policy Practice. Journal of Public Policy, 38(2), 221–242.Google Scholar
Hinterleitner, M. (2019). Salami Tactics and the Implementation of Large-Scale Public Projects. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(11), 1696–1714.Google Scholar
Hinterleitner, M., & Sager, F. (2015). Avoiding Blame – A Comprehensive Framework and the Australian Home Insulation Program Fiasco. Policy Studies Journal, 43(1), 139–161.Google Scholar
Hinterleitner, M., & Sager, F. (2017). Anticipatory and Reactive Forms of Blame Avoidance: Of Foxes and Lions. European Political Science Review, 9(4), 587–606.Google Scholar
Hinterleitner, M., & Sager, F. (2018). Blame, reputation and organizational responses to a politicized climate. In Bach, T. & Wegrich, K. (Eds.), The Blind Spots of Public Bureaucracy and the Politics of Non‐coordination (pp. 133–150). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hinterleitner, M., & Sager, F. (2019). Governing elites under pressure: Blame avoidance strategies and welfare state retrenchment. In Careja, R., Emmenegger, P., & Giger, N. (Eds.), Work and Welfare in a Changing World (pp. 109–122). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. (1994). Social Conflicts as Pillars of Democratic Market Society. Political Theory, 22(2), 203–218.Google Scholar
Hobolt, S. B., & Klemmensen, R. (2007). Government Responsiveness and Political Competition in Comparative Perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 41(3), 309–337.Google Scholar
Hood, C. (2011). The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy, and Self-preservation in Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hood, C., Jennings, W., & Copeland, P. (2016). Blame Avoidance in Comparative Perspective: Reactivity, Staged Retreat and Efficacy. Public Administration, 94(2), 542–562.Google Scholar
Hood, C., Jennings, W., Dixon, R., Hogwood, B., & Beeston, C. (2009). Testing Times: Exploring Staged Responses and the Impact of Blame Management Strategies in Two Examination Fiasco Cases. European Journal of Political Research, 48(6), 695–722.Google Scholar
Hoppe, R. (2011). The Governance of Problems: Puzzling, Powering, and Participation. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howlett, M., & Tosun, J. (Eds.). (2019). Policy Styles and Policy-Making: Exploring the Linkages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Iyengar, S. (1990). Framing Responsibility for Political Issues: The Case of Poverty. Political Behavior, 12(1), 19–40.Google Scholar
Jacobs, A. M., & Weaver, R. K. (2015). When Policies Undo Themselves: Self-Undermining Feedback as a Source of Policy Change. Governance, 28(4), 441–457.Google Scholar
Jennings, W., Lodge, M., & Ryan, M. (2018). Comparing Blunders in Government. European Journal of Political Research, 57(1), 238–258.Google Scholar
Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2007). The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jupe, R. (2009). New Labour, Public–Private Partnerships and Rail Transport Policy. Economic Affairs, 29(1), 20–25.Google Scholar
Kang, S.-G., & Powell, G. B. (2010). Representation and Policy Responsiveness: The Median Voter, Election Rules, and Redistributive Welfare Spending. The Journal of Politics, 72(4), 1014–1028.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, P. J. (1985). Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
King, A., & Crewe, I. (2014). The Blunders of our Governments. London: Oneworld Publications.Google Scholar
Kirchheimer, O. (1957). The Waning of Opposition in Parliamentary Regimes. Social Research, 24(1), 127–156.Google Scholar
König, P. D., & Wenzelburger, G. (2014). Toward a Theory of Political Strategy in Policy Analysis. Politics & Policy, 42(3), 400–430.Google Scholar
Leong, C., & Howlett, M. (2017). On Credit and Blame: Disentangling the Motivations of Public Policy Decision-Making Behaviour. Policy Sciences, 50(4), 599–618.Google Scholar
Levi-Faur, D. (2004). Comparative research designs in the study of regulation: How to increase the number of cases without compromising the strengths of case-oriented analysis. In Jordana, J. & Levi-Faur, D. (Eds.), The Politics of Regulation: Institutions and Regulatory Reforms for the Age of Governance (pp. 177–199). Cheltenham: E. Elgar.Google Scholar
Levi-Faur, D. (2006a). Varieties of Regulatory Capitalism: Getting the Most Out of the Comparative Method. Governance, 19(3), 367–382.Google Scholar
Levi-Faur, D. (2006b). A Question of Size? In Rihoux, B. & Grimm, H. M. (Eds.), Innovative Comparative Methods for Policy Analysis: Beyond the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide (pp. 43–66). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How Democracies Die. New York: Crown Publishing.Google Scholar
Lieberman, R. C., Mettler, S., Pepinsky, T. B., Roberts, K. M., & Valelly, R. (2019). The Trump Presidency and American Democracy. Perspectives on Politics, 17(2), 470–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, A. (2012). Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries (2nd rev ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Linde, J., & Vis, B. (2017). Do Politicians Take Risks Like the Rest of Us? An Experimental Test of Prospect Theory under MPs. Political Psychology, 38(1), 101–117.Google Scholar
Lodge, M., Wegrich, K., & McElroy, G. (2010). Dodgy Kebabs Everywhere? Variety of Worldviews and Regulatory Change. Public Administration, 88(1), 247–266.Google Scholar
Lowi, T. J. (1964). American Business, Public Policy, Case-Studies, and Political Theory. World Politics, 16(4), 677–715.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. A. (Eds.). (2015). Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis. Strategies for Social Inquiry. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mair, P. (2007). Political Opposition and the European Union. Government and Opposition, 42(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
Mayhew, D. R. (1974). Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McConnell, A. (2010a). Policy Success, Policy Failure and Grey Areas In-Between. Journal of Public Policy, 30(3), 345–362.Google Scholar
McConnell, A. (2010b). Understanding Policy Success: Rethinking Public Policy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
McGraw, K. M. (1990). Avoiding Blame: An Experimental Investigation of Political Excuses and Justifications. British Journal of Political Science, 20(1), 119–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGraw, K. M. (1991). Managing Blame: An Experimental Test of the Effects of Political Accounts. American Political Science Review, 85(4), 1133–1157.Google Scholar
Mettler, S., & SoRelle, M. (2014). Policy feedback theory. In Sabatier, P. A. & Weible, C. M. (Eds.), Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Mettler, S., & Soss, J. (2004). The Consequences of Public Policy for Democratic Citizenship: Bridging Policy Studies and Mass Politics. Perspectives on Politics, 2(1), 55–73.Google Scholar
Moe, T. M. (2005). Power and Political Institutions. Perspectives on Politics, 3(2), 215–233.Google Scholar
Moran, M. (2015). Politics and Governance in the UK (3rd ed.). Macmillan Education. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Mortensen, P. B. (2012). ‘It’s the Central Government’s Fault’: Elected Regional Officials’ Use of Blame-Shifting Rhetoric. Governance, 25(3), 439–461.Google Scholar
Mortensen, P. B. (2016). Agencification and Blame Shifting: Evaluating a Neglected Side of Public Sector Reforms. Public Administration, 94(3), 630–646.Google Scholar
Mounk, Y. (2018). The People vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Moynihan, D. P. (2012). Extra-Network Organizational Reputation and Blame Avoidance in Networks: The Hurricane Katrina Example. Governance, 25(4), 567–588.Google Scholar
Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (Eds.). (2013). Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy? New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nai, A., & Walter, A. (Eds.). (2015). New Perspectives on Negative Campaigning: Why Attack Politics Matters. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Olsen, J. P. (2015). Democratic Order, Autonomy, and Accountability. Governance, 28(4), 425–440.Google Scholar
Orren, K., & Skowronek, S. (2017). The Policy State: An American Predicament. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1992). The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pal, L. A., & Weaver, R. K. (2003). The Government Taketh Away: The Politics of Pain in the United States and Canada. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, C. (2007). How to Map Arguments in Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Patashnik, E. M., & Zelizer, J. E. (2013). The Struggle to Remake Politics: Liberal Reform and the Limits of Policy Feedback in the Contemporary American State. Perspectives on Politics, 11(4), 1071–1087.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (1993). When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change. World Politics, 45(4), 595–628.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (2007a). Public policies as institutions. In Shapiro, I., Skowronek, S., & Galvin, D. (Eds.), Rethinking Political Institutions: The Art of the State (pp. 114–131). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (2007b). The rise and reconfiguration of activist government. In Pierson, P. & Skocpol, T. (Eds.), The Transformation of American politics: Activist Government and the Rise of Conservatism. Princeton Studies in American Politics (pp. 19–38). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, G. B. (2004). The Chain of Responsiveness. Journal of Democracy, 15(4), 91–105.Google Scholar
Powell, G. B. (2011). Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. (Ed.). (2014). Policy Styles in Western Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rochefort, D. A., & Cobb, R. W. (Eds.). (1994). The Politics of Problem Definition: Shaping the Policy Agenda. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Sabato, L. (2000). Feeding Frenzy: Attack Journalism and American Politics. Baltimore: Lanahan Publishers.Google Scholar
Sager, F., Ingold, K., & Balthasar, A. (2017). Policy-Analyse in der Schweiz: Besonderheiten, Theorien, Beispiele. Zurich: NZZ Libro.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Theoretical Lenses on Public Policy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. (1935). Politics, Pressure and the Tariff. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. (1975). The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1993). Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy. American Political Science Review, 87(2), 334–347.Google Scholar
Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schranz, M. (2015). Carlos und die Medien – eine öffentliche Debatte kritisch reflektiert. In Riklin, F. (Ed.), Schweizer Jugendstrafrecht: vorbildlich oder überholt? (pp. 63–77). Bern: Stämpfli.Google Scholar
Seibel, W. (2014). Kausale Mechanismen des Behördenversagens: Eine Prozessanalyse des Fahndungsfehlschlags bei der Aufklärung der NSU-Morde. Der moderne Staat: dms; Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management, 7(2), 375–413.Google Scholar
Shea, D. M., & Sproveri, A. (2012). The Rise and Fall of Nasty Politics in America. PS: Political Science & Politics, 45(3), 416–421.Google Scholar
Sheffer, L., & Loewen, P. J. (2019). Accountability, Framing Effects, and Risk-Seeking by Elected Representatives: An Experimental Study with American Local Politicians. Political Research Quarterly, 72(1): 49–62.Google Scholar
Sheffer, L., Loewen, P. J., Soroka, S., Walgrave, S., & Sheafer, T. (2018). Nonrepresentative Representatives: An Experimental Study of the Decision Making of Elected Politicians. American Political Science Review, 112(2): 302–321.Google Scholar
Snyder, T. (2018). The Road to Unfreedom: Russia, Europe, America (1st ed.). New York: Tim Duggan Books.Google Scholar
Soss, J. O., & Schram, S. F. (2007). A Public Transformed? Welfare Reform as Policy Feedback. American Political Science Review, 101(1), 111–127.Google Scholar
Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. A. (Eds.). (2005). Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sulitzeanu-Kenan, R. (2010). Reflection in the Shadow of Blame: When Do Politicians Appoint Commissions of Inquiry? British Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 613–634.Google Scholar
Sulitzeanu-Kenan, R., & Hood, C. (2005). Blame Avoidance with Adjectives? Motivation, Opportunity, Activity and Outcome. Paper for ECPR Joint Sessions, April 14–20, 2005, Granada.Google Scholar
Thelen, K. A., & Mahoney, J. (2015). Comparative-historical analysis in contemporary political science. In Mahoney, J. & Thelen, K. A. (Eds.), Strategies for Social Inquiry. Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis (pp. 3–36). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, G. (1990). Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tushnet, M. (2003). Constitutional Hardball. John Marshall Law Review, 37, 523–553.Google Scholar
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.Google Scholar
Umbricht, A., & Esser, F. (2016). The Push to Popularize Politics. Journalism Studies, 17(1), 100–121.Google Scholar
Urwyler, C., & Nett, J. C. (2012). Evaluation der Wirksamkeit des neuen Jugendstrafgesetzes. Bern: Berner Fachhochschule.Google Scholar
Vatter, A. (2016). Das politische System der Schweiz (2nd ed.). Stuttgart: UTB Verlag.Google Scholar
van Kersbergen, K., & Vis, B. (2015). Comparative Welfare State Politics: Development, Opportunities, and Reform. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Verhoest, K., van Thiel, S., Bouckaert, G., & Lægreid, P. (Eds.). (2012). Government Agencies: Practices and Lessons from 30 Countries. Public sector organizations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vis, B. (2011). Prospect Theory and Political Decision Making. Political Studies Review, 9(3), 334–343.Google Scholar
Vis, B. (2016). Taking Stock of the Comparative Literature on the Role of Blame Avoidance Strategies in Social Policy Reform. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 18(2), 122–137.Google Scholar
Vogel, S. K. (1996). Freer Markets, More Rules: Regulatory Reform in Advanced Industrial Countries. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Weaver, R. K. (1986). The Politics of Blame Avoidance. Journal of Public Policy, 6(4), 371–398.Google Scholar
Weaver, R. K. (2013). Policy Leadership and the Blame Trap: Seven Strategies for Avoiding Policy Stalemate. Governance Studies. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Weaver, R. K. (2018). The Nays Have It: How Rampant Blame Generating Distorts American Policy and Politics. Political Science Quarterly, 133(2), 259–289.Google Scholar
Weaver, R. K., & Rockman, B. A. (Eds.). (1993). Do Institutions Matter? Government Capabilities in the United States and Abroad. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Weible, C. M., & Heikkila, T. (2017). Policy Conflict Framework. Policy Sciences, 50(1), 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenzelburger, G. (2011). Political Strategies and Fiscal Retrenchment: Evidence from Four Countries. West European Politics, 34(6), 1151–1184.Google Scholar
Wlezien, C., & Soroka, S. N. (2012). Political Institutions and the Opinion–Policy Link. West European Politics, 35(6), 1407–1432.Google Scholar
Woodhouse, D. (2004). UK Ministerial Responsibility in 2002: The Tale of Two Resignations. Public Administration, 82(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
Zaller, J. (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Markus Hinterleitner, Brown University, Rhode Island
  • Book: Policy Controversies and Political Blame Games
  • Online publication: 30 October 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108860116.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Markus Hinterleitner, Brown University, Rhode Island
  • Book: Policy Controversies and Political Blame Games
  • Online publication: 30 October 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108860116.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Markus Hinterleitner, Brown University, Rhode Island
  • Book: Policy Controversies and Political Blame Games
  • Online publication: 30 October 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108860116.012
Available formats
×