Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:11:10.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of dietary methionine and white tea on oxidative status of gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2011

Amalia Pérez-Jiménez*
Affiliation:
CIMAR/CIIMAR – Centro Interdisciplinar de Investigação Marinha e Ambiental, Universidade do Porto, Rua dos Bragas 289, 4050-123Porto, Portugal Departamento Zoología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Granada, Campus Fuentenueva s/n, 18071Granada, Spain
Helena Peres
Affiliation:
CIMAR/CIIMAR – Centro Interdisciplinar de Investigação Marinha e Ambiental, Universidade do Porto, Rua dos Bragas 289, 4050-123Porto, Portugal
Vera Cruz Rubio
Affiliation:
Centro Oceanográfico de Murcia, Instituto Español de Oceanografía (IEO), Carretera de la Azohía s/n, Puerto de Mazarrón, 30860Murcia, Spain
Aires Oliva-Teles
Affiliation:
CIMAR/CIIMAR – Centro Interdisciplinar de Investigação Marinha e Ambiental, Universidade do Porto, Rua dos Bragas 289, 4050-123Porto, Portugal Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre, Edifício FC4, 4169-007Porto, Portugal
*
*Corresponding author: A. Pérez-Jiménez, fax +351 22 040 2709, email calaya@ugr.es
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Free radicals are continuously generated during an organism's lifetime. In order to understand the involvement in the oxidative status of fish, methionine and white tea were assayed as antioxidant supplements in diets for gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata). For the purpose of this study, four isonitrogenous and isolipidic diets were formulated to contain 45 % of protein and 18 % lipid and 0·3 % methionine (Met diet), 2·9 % white tea dry leaves (Tea diet) and 2·9 % of white tea dry leaves+0·3 % methionine (Tea+Met diet). An unsupplemented diet was used as the control. Key enzymatic antioxidant defences, superoxide dismutase (SOD) isoenzyme profile, total, reduced and oxidised glutathione and oxidative damage markers were determined. The results showed that dietary methionine supplementation increased liver SOD activity, while white tea induced higher hepatic catalase activity. Dietary white tea induced a notable increase in Mn-SOD isoenzyme. This is the first study to provide evidence that dietary tea inclusion in fish feeding could be an important source of Mn with metabolic repercussions on antioxidant mechanisms.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2011

Free radicals and reactive species, from oxygen or nitrogen (henceforth named ROS), are continuously generated in all aerobic biological systems under normal or stressful conditions. In order to avoid and/or repair the damage these compounds may cause in the tissues, organisms possess adequate protection systems that are both enzymatic and non-enzymatic in origin(Reference Halliwell and Gutteridge1).

The most important of non-enzymatic defences in fish include numerous low-molecular weight antioxidants like reduced glutathione (GSH), and several vitamins such as α-tocopherol (vitamin E) or ascorbic acid (vitamin C)(Reference Halliwell and Gutteridge1). Key enzymatic antioxidant defences include enzymes such as superoxide dismutases (SOD), a group composed of different metalloenzymes(Reference Fridovich2, Reference Wuerges, Lee and Yim3), which catalyse the conversion of the superoxide anion dismutation to molecular oxygen and H2O2. H2O2 is subsequently detoxified by two types of enzymes, catalase (CAT) which metabolises H2O2 to molecular oxygen and water, and glutathione peroxidase (GPX) which detoxifies H2O2 into water, or organic peroxides into their corresponding stable alcohols, by oxidising the GSH into its oxidised form (GSSG). Finally, glutathione reductase (GR) maintains GSH/GSSG homeostasis, catalysing the reduction of GSSG into GSH(Reference Halliwell and Gutteridge1).

Despite all these defence mechanisms, when an uncontrolled ROS production takes place or antioxidant defences are deficient, an oxidative stress situation arises, with a large number of biochemical and physiological consequences. The resulting oxidative damage then affects lipids, proteins, carbohydrates and DNA, with negative effects on cellular structures which affect the organism's welfare and may even lead to death(Reference Halliwell and Gutteridge1).

Under normal physiological status, oxidative balance can be tilted in favour of an improved welfare by supplying in the diets nutrients that enhance the antioxidant system. Except for traditional antioxidants such as some vitamins or minerals(Reference Martínez-Álvarez, Morales and Sanz4), little is known about alternative nutrients with antioxidant potential in the fish redox state. This is the case with amino acids like methionine or phytochemicals such as tea polyphenols whose potential application in fish antioxidant status improvement has been poorly studied(Reference Keembiyehetty and Gatlin5Reference Thawonsuwan, Kiron and Satoh8).

Methionine is an essential sulphur amino acid which, besides being a component of proteins, is a precursor of cysteine, an indispensable compound for the synthesis of glutathione and taurine, molecules with important roles in oxidative defence mechanisms(Reference Wu, Fang and Yang9Reference Métayer, Seiliez and Collin11). Additionally, the methionine oxidation/reduction cycle also acts in the natural scavenging of ROS via the methionine sulphoxide reductase system(Reference Métayer, Seiliez and Collin11, Reference Weissbach, Resnick and Brot12). Although a few studies have been performed in rats(Reference Wang, Chen and Sheen13, Reference Petropoulos, Mary and Perichon14), to our knowledge, research on the methionine effect in the oxidative status of fish is scarce(Reference Keembiyehetty and Gatlin5, Reference Li, Burr and Wen7).

Tea, a product obtained from Camellia sinensis leaves, is an important beverage consumed worldwide, which has been considered to possess powerful antioxidant properties due to its high content of polyphenols, especially catechins and flavonoids(Reference Yokozawa, Nakgagawa and Kitani15Reference Nie and Xie17). These compounds may directly or indirectly act as antioxidants by inducing antioxidant enzymes, inhibiting pro-oxidant enzymes or reacting with oxidant agents(Reference Coimbra, Castro and Rocha-Pereira16). Composition of the different commercialised teas differs depending on leaf processing. In the case of white tea, the leaves are harvested before they are fully open and are not oxidised or rolled, but simply withered and dried by steaming. This simple process allows white tea to retain the maximum amount of original polyphenols, making it one of the teas with the highest antioxidant potential(Reference Rusak, Komes and Likic18, Reference Sajilata, Bajaj and Singhal19). This makes white tea a candidate as an antioxidant additive to be used in fish feeding. However, although there have been many studies performed in rats(Reference Wang and Wang20Reference Byun, Kwon and Hong22), the evaluation of the effect of dietary tea in fish is not abundant(Reference Ishihara, Araki and Tamaru6, Reference Liu and Pan23, Reference Cho, Lee and Park24), especially regarding its effects on the oxidative status of the animals(Reference Thawonsuwan, Kiron and Satoh8, Reference Abdel-Tawwab, Ahmad and Seden25).

The aim of the present study was to assess the influence of diets containing methionine, white tea or a mixture of both on the oxidative status of gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata). For this purpose, the activity of key antioxidant enzymes, non-enzymatic defences and lipid oxidative damage were evaluated in the liver of sea bream. Additionally, possible modifications induced by the different dietary treatments in the hepatic SOD isoenzymatic pattern were also determined.

Materials and methods

Experimental diets

A control diet was formulated based on fish meal and fish oil as the main protein and lipid sources (containing 45 % protein and 18 % lipid, respectively). Following this, three other diets were formulated similar to the control diet but supplemented with 0·3 % methionine (Met diet), 2·9 % white tea dry leaves (Tea diet) and 2·9 % white tea dry leaves+0·3 % methionine (Tea+Met diet). Dietary ingredients were thoroughly mixed and dry-pelleted in a laboratory pellet mill (California Pellet Mill) using a 3 mm die. The pellets were air-dried at 40°C for 24 h and stored in a refrigerator until use. Ingredient composition and proximate analyses of the experimental diets are shown in Table 1. Chemical analyses of the diets were performed following Association of Official Analytical Chemists methods(26).

Table 1 Composition and proximate analysis of the experimental diets

C, control; CP, crude protein.

* Steam-Dried LT; Pesqueira Diamante (CP: 77·2 % DM; gross lipid: 8·5 % DM).

Sopropêche (CP: 75·8 % DM; GL: 18·8 % DM).

Cerestar (approximately 99 % amylopectin).

§ Minerals (mg/kg diet): cobalt sulphate, 1·91; copper sulphate, 19·6; iron sulphate, 200; sodium fluoride, 2·21; potassium iodide, 0·78; magnesium oxide, 830; manganese oxide, 26; sodium selenite, 0·66; zinc oxide, 37·5; dibasic calcium phosphate, 5·9 (g/kg diet); potassium chloride, 1·15 (g/kg diet); NaCl, 0·4 (g/kg diet).

Vitamins (mg/kg diet): retinol, 18 000 (IU/kg diet); calciferol, 2000 (IU/kg diet); α-tocopherol, 35; menadion sodium bisulphate 10; thiamine, 15; riboflavin, 25; calcium pantothenate, 50; nicotinic acid, 200; pyridoxine, 5; folic acid, 10; cyanocobalamin, 0·02; biotin, 1·5; ascorbyl monophosphate, 50; inositol, 400.

Aquacube.

** Nitrogen-free extract = 100 − (CP+crude lipid+ash).

Animals and experimental conditions

This experiment was directed by trained scientists (following FELASA category C recommendations) and was conducted according to the European Economic Community animal experimentation guidelines Directive of 24 November 1986 (86/609/EEC). The experiment was performed at the Marine Zoology Station, University of Porto. Gilthead sea bream juveniles (S. aurata) obtained from a commercial hatchery were randomly distributed into twelve groups of twenty fish each (35 g mean initial weight). Each group was maintained in a fibreglass tank of 100-litre capacity within a thermoregulated recirculation water system kept at a constant temperature of 22·0 ± 1·0°C, and supplied with filtered seawater (37 ‰) at a flow rate of 4·0 litres/min. Dissolved oxygen averaged 95 % of the saturation level. The photoperiod was the natural one for November and December. After 15 d of acclimatisation to the rearing conditions, the experimental diets were randomly assigned to triplicate groups of animals that were hand-fed to apparent visual satiation, twice a day, 6 d a week, during a 30 d period. Food intake and mortality were recorded daily and fish in each tank were bulk-weighed at the beginning and at the end of the experimental period.

Sampling

Fish feeding was discontinued 24 h before sampling. Then, two animals per tank (six per treatment) were randomly sampled and killed with a sharp blow on the head. The liver was excised and immediately frozen in liquid N2 and thereafter stored at − 80°C until use.

Enzyme activity

The liver samples were homogenised in nine volumes of ice-cold 100 mm-Tris–HCl buffer containing 0·1 mm-EDTA and 0·1 % (v/v) Triton X-100, pH 7·8. The procedure was performed on ice. Homogenates were centrifuged at 30 000 g for 30 min at 4°C and the resultant supernatants were kept in aliquots and stored at − 80°C until use. All enzyme assays were carried out at 25°C and the changes in absorbance were monitored to determine the enzyme activity using a microplate reader (ELx808; Bio-Tek Instruments). The optimal substrate and protein concentrations for the measurement of maximal activity for each enzyme were established by preliminary assays. The molar extinction coefficients used for H2O2 and NADPH were 0·039 and 6·22 cm/mm, respectively. The assay conditions were as follows:

  • Glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH; EC 1.1.1.49) activity was measured as previously described by Morales et al. (Reference Morales, García-Rejón and De la Higuera27), using a reaction mixture containing 50 mm-imidazole–HCl buffer (pH 7·4), 5 mm-MgCl2, 2 mm-NADP and 1 mm-glucose-6-phosphate.

  • CAT (EC 1.11.1.6) activity was determined by measuring the decrease in H2O2 concentration at 240 nm according to Aebi(Reference Aebi28). The reaction mixture contained 50 mm-potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7·0) and 10 mm-H2O2 freshly added.

  • SOD (EC 1.15.1.1) activity was measured by the ferricytochrome c method using xanthine/xanthine oxidase as the source of superoxide radicals. The reaction was monitored at 550 nm according to McCord & Fridovich(Reference McCord and Fridovich29). The reaction mixture consisted of 50 mm-potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7·8), 0·1 mm-EDTA, 0·1 mm-xanthine, 0·012 mm-cytochrome c and 0·025 IU/ml xanthine oxidase. Activity is reported in units of SOD/mg of protein. Here, one unit of activity is defined as the amount of enzyme necessary to produce a 50 % inhibition of the ferricytochrome c reduction rate.

  • GPX (EC 1.11.1.9) activity was measured following the method of Flohé & Günzler(Reference Flohé and Günzler30). The GSSG generated by GPX was reduced by GR, and NADPH oxidation was monitored at 340 nm. The reaction mixture consisted of 50 mm-potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7·1), 1 mm-EDTA, 3·9 mm-GSH, 3·9 mm-sodium azide, 1 IU/ml GR, 0·2 mm-NADPH and 0·05 mm-H2O2.

  • GR (EC 1.6.4.2) activity was assayed as described by Morales et al. (Reference Morales, Pérez-Jiménez and Hidalgo31), measuring the oxidation of NADPH at 340 nm. The reaction mixture consisted of 0·1 m-sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7·5), 1 mm-EDTA, 0·63 mm-NADPH and 0·16 mm-GSSG.

Soluble protein concentration was determined using the method of Bradford(Reference Bradford32), with bovine serum albumin used as a standard.

Except for SOD, the units of expression of which were indicated earlier, enzyme activity is expressed as units (CAT) or milliunits (G6PDH, GPX and GR) per mg of soluble protein. Here, one unit of enzyme activity is defined as the amount of enzyme required to transform 1 μmol of substrate/min under the aforementioned assay conditions.

Superoxide dismutase isoforms separation

Assays were performed as described previously by Pérez-Jiménez et al. (Reference Pérez-Jiménez, Hidalgo and Morales33). Briefly, non-denaturing PAGE was performed on 10 % acrylamide minigels (MiniProtean II; Bio-Rad Laboratories) and carried out at 4°C. SOD isoenzymes were detected in the gels immediately after the completion of electrophoresis by the photochemical nitroblue tetrazolium staining method. The various types of SOD were differentiated by performing the activity stains in gels previously incubated for 30 min at 25°C in 50 mm-potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7·8), in the absence and the presence of 25 mm-KCN. CuZn–SOD are inhibited by KCN, whereas Mn-SOD are resistant to this inhibitor(Reference Fridovich34). The different isoenzymatic bands of SOD were quantified by a densitometric analysis using the software Fujifilm Multigauge version 3.0 for Windows (Fuji Film Co., Ltd). The results for each band were expressed as arbitrary intensity units.

Total glutathione, oxidised glutathione and oxidative stress index

A portion of the liver was homogenised in nine volumes of ice-cold solution containing 1·3 % 5-sulphosalicylic acid (w/v) and 10 mm-HCl. The procedure was carefully performed always on ice in order to avoid the oxidation of glutathione (GSH). Homogenates were centrifuged at 14 000 g for 10 min at 4°C and the resulting supernatants were analysed immediately.

Total glutathione (tGSH) and GSSG were measured following the method described by Griffith(Reference Griffith35) and Vandeputte et al. (Reference Vandeputte, Guizon and Genestie-Denis36) with some modifications. Both tGSH and GSSG analyses were measured at 25°C and the changes in absorbance as consequence of the reduction of 5,5′-dithiobis (2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB) were monitored at 405 nm using a microplate reader (ELx808; Bio-Tek Instruments). The optimal substrate and protein concentrations for the measurement of maximal activity for each enzyme were established by preliminary assays.

tGSH was determined using a reaction mixture containing 133 mm-phosphate buffer with 5·8 mm-EDTA at pH 7·4, 0·71 mm-DTNB, 0·24 mm-NADPH and 1·2 IU/ml GR.

GSSG was measured using an aliquot from the solution obtained after 60 min of incubation of 100 μl of sample with 2 μl vinylpyridine and 6 μl 1·5 m-triethanolamine. The reaction mixture contained 122 mm-phosphate buffer with 5·4 mm-EDTA at pH 7·4, 0·71 mm-DTNB, 0·24 mm-NADPH and 1·2 IU/ml GR.

The results were calculated using standard curves of GSH and GSSG for tGSH and GSSG, respectively. GSH level was calculated by subtracting GSSG from tGSH values. The results are expressed as nmol/g of tissue.

Oxidative stress index (OSI) was calculated as

\begin{eqnarray} OSI = 100\times (2\times GSSG/tGSH). \end{eqnarray}

Lipid peroxidation

Lipid peroxidation was determined in the liver. The concentration of thiobarbituric acid-reacting substances was determined according to Buege & Aust(Reference Buege and Aust37). An aliquot of supernatant from the homogenate (100 μl) was mixed with 500 μl of a previously prepared solution containing 15 % (w/v) TCA, 0·375 % (w/v) thiobarbituric acid, 80 % (v/v) HCl 0·25 m and 0·01 % (w/v) butylated hydroxytoluene. The mixture was heated to 100°C for 15 min and after cooling to room temperature, centrifuged at 1500 g for 10 min. Absorbance in the supernatant was measured at 535 nm and compared with a blank. Concentration was expressed as nmol malondialdehyde/g of tissue, calculated from a calibration curve.

Statistical analysis

Results are presented as means with their standard errors. All statistical analyses were carried out using the SPSS version 18.0 for Windows software package (SPSS, Inc.). After data normalisation, the effect of the assayed parameters was analysed using one-way ANOVA. When F values were significant (P < 0·05), means were compared using Tukey's honestly significant difference test(Reference Tukey38).

Results

Feed efficiency, growth and mortality

No mortality occurred during the trial. Values for final body weight of fish and feed efficiency ranged from 49·9 to 53·4 g and from 0·63 to 0·70 g, respectively, and were not significantly different with regard to the control group.

Glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase and antioxidant enzyme activities

Specific activities of antioxidant enzymes and G6PDH in sea bream liver are shown in Table 2. Dietary tea supplementation induced higher CAT activity, while SOD activity was higher in fish fed the methionine-supplemented diets. Lower GPX activity was observed in the Tea+Met group compared to the Met group. Although a tendency to lower values of liver G6PDH activity was observed in fish fed the Tea and Tea+Met diets, differences among the diets were not significant. GR activity was not affected by dietary composition.

Table 2 Specific activities of catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPX), glutathione reductase (GR) and glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH) in the liver of sea bream fed the different diets

(Mean values with their standard errors (n 6))

a,b,c Mean values within the same column with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P < 0·05).

Superoxide dismutase isoenzymatic profile

Fig. 1 shows the hepatic SOD isoenzymatic profiles in the experimental groups. In all groups, three SOD isoenzymes were detected. They were named as CuZn-SOD I, CuZn-SOD II and Mn-SOD in the order of increasing mobility. Intensity of CuZn-SOD I isoenzyme was five times higher than that of CuZn-SOD II. Diet composition only influenced the intensity of the Mn-SOD isoenzyme which was significantly higher in the experimental groups than in the control group. However, group fed the tea-supplemented diet had significantly higher Mn-SOD isoenzyme than the Met group and the effect of diet supplementation on the Mn-SOD isoenzyme was additive, as activity was further increased in the group fed the Tea+Met diet.

Fig. 1 Superoxide dismutase (SOD) isoenzymatic profile in the liver of sea bream fed on different dietary treatments. Crude extracts (35 μg protein) were loaded onto non-denaturing polyacrylamide gels, and staining of gels was performed by the nitroblue tetrazolium photochemical reduction method. Determination of Mn-SOD was performed by incubating gels with 25 mm-potassium cyanide to inhibit CuZn-SOD activity. Graphics show densitometric analyses of the intensity of activity for Mn-SOD, CuZn-SOD I and CuZn-SOD II. Values are means with their standard errors represented by vertical bars (n 2). Data are expressed as arbitrary intensity units of each band. a,b,c,d Mean values with unlike letters indicate the influence (P < 0·05) of diet composition for each determined parameter. , Control; , methionine; , tea; , tea+methionine.

Non-enzymatic antioxidant defences

Liver glutathione levels are presented in Table 3. tGSH and GSH levels in the experimental groups were not different from those of the control group; however, both tGSH and GSH levels were significantly higher in the Tea+Met group than in the other experimental groups and GSSG was significantly lower in the Tea group than in the other groups.

Table 3 Total glutathione (tGSH), oxidised glutathione (GSSG), reduced glutathione (GSH), oxidative stress index (OSI) and oxidative damage biomarker for lipids in the liver of sea bream fed on different dietary treatments

(Mean values with their standard errors (n 6))

MDA, malondialdehyde.

a,b Mean values within the same column with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P < 0·05).

Oxidative damage markers

Data on oxidative damage biomarker for lipids and OSI are presented in Table 3. Neither lipid peroxidation levels nor OSI index values were affected by dietary composition.

Discussion

Free radicals and ROS and reactive nitrogen species are continuously generated during the life span of an organism. Consequently, adequate protection systems, both enzymatic and non-enzymatic, are necessary to avoid and/or repair the damage these compounds may cause in the tissues. This is particularly relevant in aquaculture, since the oxidative damage of fish tissues besides affecting animal welfare, is directly associated with the quality and palatability of the final product for the consumer(Reference Senso, Suárez and Ruiz-Cara39Reference Sargent, Tocher, Bell, Halver and Hardy41).

One way of improving the animal's oxidative status is by incorporating in feeds specific components that stimulate the antioxidant defences. Within these supplements, methionine and tea have been evaluated as potential agents for enhancing the defence capacity against free-radical attack in several animal species(Reference Li, Burr and Wen7, Reference Thawonsuwan, Kiron and Satoh8, Reference Métayer, Seiliez and Collin11, Reference Wang, Chen and Sheen13, Reference Coimbra, Castro and Rocha-Pereira16, Reference Nie and Xie17). Methionine, besides being a natural scavenging agent of ROS via the methionine sulphoxide reductase system(Reference Métayer, Seiliez and Collin11, Reference Weissbach, Resnick and Brot12), is a precursor of cysteine, which is indispensable for glutathione and taurine synthesis, two molecules with an important role in the oxidative defence(Reference Wu, Fang and Yang9Reference Métayer, Seiliez and Collin11). In the present study, dietary methionine supplementation did not affect liver glutathione levels or CAT and GPX activities, but increased SOD activity. Similarly, Walton et al. (Reference Walton, Cowey and Adron42) also did not observe any effect of dietary methionine in liver GSH levels of Oncorhynchus mykiss. However, Keembiyehetty & Gatlin(Reference Keembiyehetty and Gatlin5) observed lower tGSH levels (both reduced and oxidised form) in Morone chrysops × Morone saxatilis fed on a methionine-deficient diet. According to Li et al. (Reference Li, Burr and Wen7), methionine deficiency may reduce or even exhaust the main non-enzymatic antioxidant defences such as ascorbic acid, vitamin E or glutathione with consequent negative repercussions in the normal physiological state of the animals. Thus, it may be concluded that dietary methionine supplementation above the requirement level for the species does not seem necessary for maintaining normal hepatic glutathione levels in sea bream juveniles. In this study, dietary methionine supplementation also did not induce significant modifications in the lipid oxidative damage biomarkers, while in M. chrysops × M. saxatilis a tendency for liver thiobarbituric acid-reacting substances content to decrease was observed in fish fed on increased levels of dietary methionine(Reference Li, Burr and Wen7).

In other animals, the important antioxidant capacity of tea polyphenols was already described in several studies(Reference Yokozawa, Nakgagawa and Kitani15Reference Nie and Xie17, Reference Sajilata, Bajaj and Singhal19). There are, however, few studies in fish on the effect of dietary tea in antioxidant enzymes. Thawonsuwan et al. (Reference Thawonsuwan, Kiron and Satoh8) observed that liver SOD activity of O. mykiss fed on diets containing epigallocatechin gallate, a tea catechin, was not different from that of the control, although plasma SOD activity was lower in fish fed epigallocatechin gallate-supplemented diets than in the control group. Accordingly, in the present study, both SOD and GPX activities in liver were unaffected, but CAT activity was enhanced by dietary tea supplementation.

Although four groups of SOD isoenzymes, characterised according to the metal content (Fe, Ni, Mn and Cu–Zn), have been identified in living organisms(Reference Fridovich2, Reference Wuerges, Lee and Yim3), only Mn (Mn-SOD) and Cu–Zn (CuZn-SOD) SOD isoenzymes have been observed in fish(Reference Morales, Pérez-Jiménez and Hidalgo31, Reference Pérez-Jiménez, Hidalgo and Morales33, Reference Aksnes and Njaa43Reference Trenzado, Morales and Palma48). All SOD isoenzymes catalyse the same reaction but they are structurally different and differ in cellular location. CuZn-SOD is found in cytosolic and extracellular fractions(Reference Weisiger and Fridovich49Reference Fattman, Schaefer and Oury54), whereas Mn-SOD is mostly mitochondrial(Reference Davies, Rice-Evans, Halliwell and Lunt50, Reference Fridovich55). Typically, Mn-SOD represents 5–20 % of total SOD activity in fish(Reference Aksnes and Njaa43, Reference Roche and Boge56), although there are exceptions, with values reaching 48 % or even 94 % in Argentina silus and O. mykiss, respectively(Reference Aksnes and Njaa43). In the present study, Mn-SOD ranged from 18·5 to 28·8 % of total activity which is within the normal activity values found in fish. Also, although the activity of CuZn-SOD isoenzymes was unaffected by diet composition, Mn-SOD isoenzyme activity was 75 % higher in the groups fed diets incorporating tea than in the control.

Different studies in mammals and fish observed that CuZn-SOD and Mn-SOD activities were regulated by dietary Cu, Zn and/or Mn content(Reference Knox, Cowey and Adron44Reference Lin, Lin and Shiau47, Reference Aruoma57Reference Hussain and Ali60). For example, dietary deficiencies of Cu and Mn in humans decreased CuZn-SOD and Mn-SOD activities, inducing peroxidative damage and mitochondrial dysfunction(Reference Aruoma57). In different tissues of rats, Mn-SOD activity increased with the increase of dietary Mn levels(Reference Thompson, Godin and Lee59, Reference Hussain and Ali60). In fish, Hidalgo et al. (Reference Hidalgo, Exposito and Palma46) observed that Zn-deficiency caused inactivation of two CuZn-SOD isoenzymes in O. mykiss. In the same species, Knox et al. (Reference Knox, Cowey and Adron44) observed that Mn-SOD activity was sensitive to the availability of Mn in the diet, reducing its activity and even CuZn-SOD activity, when fish were fed on low dietary Mn levels. A similar response of Mn-SOD was observed in Salmo salar fed Mn-deficient diets(Reference Maage, Lygren and El-Mowafi45). Recently, Lin et al. (Reference Lin, Lin and Shiau47) also found that high levels of dietary Mn increased liver Mn-SOD activity in Oreochromis niloticus × Oreochromis aureus.

Similarly, the increased Mn-SOD activity observed in sea bream fed the tea-supplemented diets could be related to a higher bioavailability of this metal in these diets. Indeed, tea is a rich source of minerals such as K, Ca, Mg, Al, Mn, Fe and others(Reference Mehra and Baker61Reference Fernández-Cáceres, Martín and Pablos64). Tea Mn content depends on several factors such as leaf processing and especially the tea origin, ranging from 390 to 1224 mg/kg for tea leaves without processing, depending on whether the tea was from Africa or Asia(Reference Karak and Bhagat63). Hence, tea is also an important source of dietary Mn, essential to be incorporated in several metalloenzymes, including SOD. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study providing evidence that tea inclusion in fish diets could be an important source of Mn with metabolic repercussions on antioxidant mechanisms.

G6PDH plays a fundamental role in NADPH production, which is required in the regeneration of GSSG to GSH by GR. In this study, liver G6PDH activity was not affected by diet composition although a trend for a decrease in activity was noticed in sea bream fed on Tea and Tea+Met diets. This is consistent with the lack of dietary effects on GR activity and on GSH levels. Thus, the slightly lower values of G6PDH observed in the Tea and Tea+Met groups might be related to the putative effects of tea in lipid metabolism rather than in ROS metabolism. Indeed, studies performed both in mammals and fish indicate that tea polyphenols inhibited the activity of lipid digestion enzymes, thus reducing intestinal absorption and serum TAG and cholesterol levels and increased lipolytic activity and β-oxidation and decreased lipogenesis pathways by reducing the activity of the enzymes involved, including G6PDH activity(Reference Thawonsuwan, Kiron and Satoh8, Reference Sajilata, Bajaj and Singhal19, Reference Cho, Lee and Park24, Reference Juhel, Armand and Pafumi65, Reference Kao, Chang and Lee66).

Accordingly, with the overall response of the antioxidant mechanisms measured in this study, the oxidative damage biomarkers measured in the present study were also not affected by diet composition. Thawonsuwan et al. (Reference Thawonsuwan, Kiron and Satoh8) showed in O. mykiss that dietary epigallocatechin gallate supplementation decreased liver lipid hydroperoxide content, an indication of lipid damage. Similarly, Ishihara et al. (Reference Ishihara, Araki and Tamaru6) observed a suppression of lipid oxidation, a deterioration of flesh colour and of microbial growth in fish body during round iced storage in Seriola quinqueradiata fed a diet supplemented with green tea.

In conclusion, the results of the present study showed that dietary methionine supplementation increased hepatic SOD enzyme activity, while white tea induced higher hepatic CAT activity and of Mn-SOD isoenzyme synthesis probably due to the increased content and/or bioavailability of Mn in white tea. Methionine and white tea had no synergistic effects on the antioxidant response of sea bream juveniles.

Acknowledgements

The present work was supported by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (pluriannual funding) through the PIDDAC Program funds from the Portuguese government and Fundación Séneca through Program for CARM 2008, Project 08767/PI/08 from the Spanish government. A. P.-J. was supported by a grant (SFRH/BPD/64684/2009) from Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Portugal. A. O.-T., H. P. and V. C. R. developed the initial idea and designed the study. H. P. and V. C. R. were responsible for feed manufacture, the feeding trial and sample collection. A. P.-J. and H. P. carried out the analytical work. A. P.-J. and A. O.-T. were responsible for data analysis. A. P.-J. wrote the manuscript with assistance from all other authors. All authors read and approved the findings of this study. None of the authors had a conflict of interest.

References

1Halliwell, B & Gutteridge, JMC (2007) Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2Fridovich, I (1995) Superoxide radical and superoxide dismutases. Annu Rev Biochem 64, 97112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Wuerges, J, Lee, JW, Yim, YI, et al. (2004) Crystal structure of nickel-containing superoxide dismutase reveals another type of active site. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101, 85698574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Martínez-Álvarez, R, Morales, A & Sanz, A (2005) Antioxidant defenses in fish: biotic and abiotic factors. Rev Fish Biol Fisher 15, 7588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Keembiyehetty, CN & Gatlin, DM III (1995) Evaluation of different sulfur compounds in the diet of juvenile sunshine bass (Morone chrysops × M. saxatilis). Comp Biochem Physiol B 112, 155159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Ishihara, N, Araki, T, Tamaru, Y, et al. (2002) Influence of green tea polyphenols on feed performance, growth performance, and fish body component in yellowtail (Seriola quinqueradiata). Jpn J Food Chem 9, 714.Google Scholar
7Li, P, Burr, GS, Wen, Q, et al. (2009) Dietary sufficiency of sulfur amino acid compounds influences plasma ascorbic acid concentrations and liver peroxidation of juvenile hybrid striped bass (Morone chrysops × M. saxatilis). Aquaculture 287, 414418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Thawonsuwan, J, Kiron, V, Satoh, S, et al. (2010) Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) affects the antioxidant and immune defense of the rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Fish Physiol Biochem 36, 687697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Wu, GY, Fang, YZ, Yang, S, et al. (2004) Glutathione metabolism and its implications for health. J Nutr 134, 489492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Li, P, Yin, YL, Li, D, et al. (2007) Amino acids and immune function. Br J Nutr 98, 237252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Métayer, S, Seiliez, I, Collin, A, et al. (2008) Mechanisms through which sulfur amino acids control protein metabolism and oxidative status. J Nutr Biochem 19, 207215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Weissbach, H, Resnick, L & Brot, N (2005) Methionine sulfoxide reductases: history and cellular role in protecting against oxidative damage. Biochim Biophys Acta 1703, 203212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Wang, ST, Chen, HW, Sheen, LY, et al. (1997) Methionine and cysteine affect glutathione level, glutathione-related enzyme activities and the expression of glutathione S-transferase isozymes in rat hepatocytes. J Nutr 127, 21352141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Petropoulos, I, Mary, J, Perichon, M, et al. (2001) Rat peptide methionine sulphoxide reductase: cloning of the cDNA, and down-regulation of gene expression and enzyme activity during aging. Biochem J 355, 819825.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Yokozawa, T, Nakgagawa, T & Kitani, K (2002) Antioxidative activity of green tea polyphenol in cholesterol-fed rats. J Agric Food Chem 50, 35493552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Coimbra, S, Castro, E, Rocha-Pereira, P, et al. (2006) The effect of green tea in oxidative stress. Clin Nutr 25, 790796.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Nie, SP & Xie, MY (2011) A review on the isolation and structure of tea polysaccharides and their bioactivities. Food Hydrocolloids 25, 144149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Rusak, G, Komes, D, Likic, S, et al. (2008) Phenolic content and antioxidative capacity of green and white tea extracts depending on extraction conditions and the solvent used. Food Chem 110, 852858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Sajilata, MG, Bajaj, PR & Singhal, RS (2008) Tea polyphenols as nutraceuticals. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Safety 7, 229254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Wang, DG & Wang, SR (1991) The pharmaceutical effects of tea polysaccharides on cardiovascular diseases. Chin Tradit Herb Drugs 2, 45.Google Scholar
21Ikeda, I, Imasato, Y, Sasaki, E, et al. (1992) Tea catechins decrease micellar solubility and intestinal absorption of cholesterol in rats. Biochim Biophys Acta 1127, 141146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Byun, DS, Kwon, MN, Hong, JH, et al. (1994) Effects of flavonoids and α-tocopherol on the oxidation of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. 2. Antioxidizing effect of catechin and α-tocopherol in rat with chemically induced lipid peroxidation. Bull Korean Fish Soc 27, 166172.Google Scholar
23Liu, YJ & Pan, BS (2004) Inhibition of fish gill lipoxygenase and blood thinning effects of green tea extract. J Agric Food Chem 52, 48604864.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Cho, SH, Lee, SM, Park, BH, et al. (2007) Effect of dietary inclusion of various sources of green tea on growth, body composition and blood chemistry of the juvenile olive flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus. Fish Physiol Biochem 33, 4957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Abdel-Tawwab, M, Ahmad, MH, Seden, MEA, et al. (2010) Use of green tea, Camellia sinensis L., in practical diet for growth and protection of Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (L.), against Aeromonas hydrophila infection. J World Aquac Soc 41, 203213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26AOAC (2000) Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC. Gaithersburg, MD: AOAC.Google Scholar
27Morales, AE, García-Rejón, L & De la Higuera, M (1990) Influence of handling and/or anaesthesia on stress response in rainbow trout. Effects on liver primary metabolism. Comp Biochem Physiol A 95, 8793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Aebi, H (1984) Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol 105, 121126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29McCord, JM & Fridovich, I (1969) Superoxide dismutase: an enzymic function for erythrocuprein. J Biol Chem 244, 60496055.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30Flohé, L & Günzler, WA (1984) Assay of glutathione peroxidase. Methods Enzymol 105, 115121.Google ScholarPubMed
31Morales, AE, Pérez-Jiménez, A, Hidalgo, MC, et al. (2004) Oxidative stress and antioxidant defenses after prolonged starvation in Dentex dentex liver. Comp Biochem Physiol C 139, 153161.Google ScholarPubMed
32Bradford, M (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein using the principle of protein dye-binding. Anal Biochem 72, 248254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33Pérez-Jiménez, A, Hidalgo, MC, Morales, AE, et al. (2009) Antioxidant enzymatic defenses and oxidative damage in Dentex dentex fed on different dietary macronutrient levels. Comp Biochem Physiol C 150, 537545.Google ScholarPubMed
34Fridovich, I (1986) Biological effects of the superoxide radical. Arch Biochem Biophys 247, 111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35Griffith, OW (1980) Determination of glutathione and glutathione disulfide using gluthatione reductase and 2-vinylpyridine. Anal Biochem 106, 207212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36Vandeputte, C, Guizon, I, Genestie-Denis, I, et al. (1994) A microtiter plate assay for total glutathione and glutathione disulfide contents in cultured/isolated cells: performance study of a new miniaturized protocol. Cell Biol Toxicol 10, 415421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37Buege, JA & Aust, SD (1978) Microsomal lipid peroxidation. Methods Enzymol 52, 302310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38Tukey, JW (1949) Comparing individual means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics 5, 99114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39Senso, L, Suárez, MD, Ruiz-Cara, T, et al. (2007) On the possible effects of harvesting season and chilled storage on the fatty acid profile of the fillet of farmed gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata). Food Chem 101, 298307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40Suárez, MD, Martínez, TF, Abellán, E, et al. (2009) The effects of the diet on flesh quality of farmed dentex (Dentex dentex). Aquaculture 288, 106113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41Sargent, JR, Tocher, DR & Bell, JG (2002) The lipids. In Fish Nutrition, 3rd ed., pp. 181257 [Halver, JE and Hardy, RW, editors]. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
42Walton, MJ, Cowey, CB & Adron, JW (1982) Methionine metabolism in rainbow trout fed diets of differing methionine and cystine content. J Nutr 112, 15251535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43Aksnes, A & Njaa, LR (1981) Catalase, glutathione-peroxidase and superoxide-dismutase in different fish species. Comp Biochem Physiol B 69, 893896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44Knox, D, Cowey, CB & Adron, JW (1981) The effect of low dietary manganese intake on rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri). Br J Nutr 46, 495501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45Maage, A, Lygren, B & El-Mowafi, AFA (2000) Manganese requirement of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) fry. Fish Sci 66, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46Hidalgo, MC, Exposito, A, Palma, JM, et al. (2002) Oxidative stress generated by dietary Zn-deficiency: studies in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Int J Biochem Cell Biol 34, 183193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47Lin, YH, Lin, SM & Shiau, SY (2008) Dietary manganese requirements of juvenile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus × O. aureus. Aquaculture 284, 207210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48Trenzado, CE, Morales, AE, Palma, JM, et al. (2009) Blood antioxidant defenses and hematological adjustments in crowded/uncrowded rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fed on diets with different levels of antioxidant vitamins and HUFA. Comp Biochem Physiol C 149, 440447.Google ScholarPubMed
49Weisiger, RA & Fridovich, I (1973) Superoxide dismutase: organelle specificity. J Biol Chem 248, 35823592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50Davies, KJA (1995) Oxidative stress: the paradox of aerobic life. In Free Radicals and Oxidative Stress: Environment, Drugs and Food Additives (Biochemical Society Symposium no. 61), pp. 131 [Rice-Evans, C, Halliwell, B and Lunt, CC, editors]. London: Portland Press.Google Scholar
51Folz, RJ, Guan, J, Seldin, MF, et al. (1997) Mouse extracellular superoxide dismutase: primary structure, tissue-specific gene expression, chromosomal localization, and lung in situ hybridization. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 17, 393403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
52Ookawara, T, Imazeki, N, Matsubara, O, et al. (1998) Tissue distribution of immunoreactive mouse extracellular superoxide dismutase. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 275, C840C847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
53Zelko, IN, Mariani, TJ & Folz, RJ (2002) Superoxide dismutase multigene family: a comparison of the CuZn-SOD (SOD1), Mn-SOD (SOD2), and ECSOD (SOD3) gene structures, evolution, and expression. Free Radic Biol Med 33, 337349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
54Fattman, CL, Schaefer, LM & Oury, TD (2003) Extracellular superoxide dismutase in biology and medicine. Free Radic Biol Med 35, 236256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
55Fridovich, I (1974) Superoxide dismutases. Adv Enzymol 41, 3597.Google ScholarPubMed
56Roche, H & Boge, G (1996) Fish blood parameters as a potential tool for identification of stress caused by environmental factors and chemical intoxication. Mar Environ Res 41, 2743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
57Aruoma, O (1998) Free radicals, oxidative stress, and antioxidants in human health and disease. J Am Oil Chem Soc 75, 199212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
58Fang, YZ, Yang, S & Wu, G (2002) Free radicals, antioxidants, and nutrition. Nutrition 18, 872879.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
59Thompson, KH, Godin, DV & Lee, M (1992) Tissue antioxidant status in streptozotocin-induced diabetes in rats. Effects of dietary manganese deficiency. Biol Trace Elem Res 35, 213224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
60Hussain, S & Ali, SF (1999) Manganese scavenges superoxide and hydroxyl radicals: an in vitro study in rats. Neurosci Lett 261, 2124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
61Mehra, A & Baker, CL (2007) Leaching and bioavailability of aluminium, copper and manganese from tea (Camellia sinensis). Food Chem 100, 14561463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
62Yemane, M, Chandravanshi, BS & Wondimu, T (2008) Levels of essential and non-essential metals in leaves of the tea plant (Camellia sinensis L.) and soil of Wushwush farms, Ethiopia. Food Chem 107, 12361243.Google Scholar
63Karak, T & Bhagat, RM (2010) Trace elements in tea leaves, made tea and tea infusion: a review. Food Res Int 43, 22342252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
64Fernández-Cáceres, PL, Martín, MJ, Pablos, F, et al. (2001) Differentiation of tea (Camellia sinensis) varieties and their geographical origin according to their metal content. J Agric Food Chem 49, 47754779.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
65Juhel, C, Armand, M, Pafumi, Y, et al. (2000) Green tea extract (AR25) inhibits lipolysis of triglycerides in gastric and duodenal medium in vitro. J Nutr Biochem 11, 4551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
66Kao, YH, Chang, HH, Lee, MG, et al. (2006) Tea, obesity, and diabetes. Mol Nutr Food Res 50, 188210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1 Composition and proximate analysis of the experimental diets

Figure 1

Table 2 Specific activities of catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPX), glutathione reductase (GR) and glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH) in the liver of sea bream fed the different diets(Mean values with their standard errors (n 6))

Figure 2

Fig. 1 Superoxide dismutase (SOD) isoenzymatic profile in the liver of sea bream fed on different dietary treatments. Crude extracts (35 μg protein) were loaded onto non-denaturing polyacrylamide gels, and staining of gels was performed by the nitroblue tetrazolium photochemical reduction method. Determination of Mn-SOD was performed by incubating gels with 25 mm-potassium cyanide to inhibit CuZn-SOD activity. Graphics show densitometric analyses of the intensity of activity for Mn-SOD, CuZn-SOD I and CuZn-SOD II. Values are means with their standard errors represented by vertical bars (n 2). Data are expressed as arbitrary intensity units of each band. a,b,c,d Mean values with unlike letters indicate the influence (P < 0·05) of diet composition for each determined parameter. , Control; , methionine; , tea; , tea+methionine.

Figure 3

Table 3 Total glutathione (tGSH), oxidised glutathione (GSSG), reduced glutathione (GSH), oxidative stress index (OSI) and oxidative damage biomarker for lipids in the liver of sea bream fed on different dietary treatments(Mean values with their standard errors (n 6))