Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-07T02:16:08.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can ecotourism change community attitudes towards conservation?—CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2021

Jackie Ziegler Open the ORCID record for Jackie Ziegler [Opens in a new window] ,
Gonzalo Araujo ,
Jessica Labaja ,
Sally Snow ,
Joseph N. King ,
Alessandro Ponzo ,
Rick Rollins  and
Philip Dearden Open the ORCID record for Philip Dearden [Opens in a new window]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Correction
Information
Oryx , Volume 55 , Issue 4 , July 2021 , pp. 638
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International

Table 3 was incorrect in this Article. The correct table is provided here.

Table 3 Conservation outcomes of whale shark tourism activities at the four tourism sites, as reported in n interviews at each site.

Post-hoc tests were calculated for ANOVA results using least significant difference if equal variance assumed (i.e. if Levene statistic P > 0.05) and Games-Howell if equal variances not assumed (i.e. if Levene's statistic P < 0.05); normal distribution of data not tested because it does not affect the outcome of parametric tests (Vaske, 2008); means with different superscript letters in the same row are significantly different (P < 0.05).

*Significant at α = 0.05.

1 The percentages reported in this section are not based on the total sample size for each site but the number of respondents who were fishers at each site (Donsol: n = 19, Oslob: n = 15, Pintuyan: n = 34, Talisayan: n = 21).

References

Ziegler, J., Araujo, G., Labaja, J., Snow, S., King, J.N., Ponzo, A. et al. (2020) Can ecotourism change community attitudes towards conservation? Oryx, published online 5 May 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 3 Conservation outcomes of whale shark tourism activities at the four tourism sites, as reported in n interviews at each site.