Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:20:00.071Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do Women Represent Women? Rethinking the “Critical Mass” Debate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2006

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Women's representation by elected women is a major research arena for scholars of women and politics. Comparativists and U.S. politics scholars, as well as feminist theorists, have given extensive attention to the question of whether or not women's political presence in legislatures is necessary for advancing policies favorable to women. Recent research and theorizing have sought to identify the conditions under which women-friendly policy might be advanced and the explanatory links between women's parliamentary presence and public policy outcomes. A key potential explanatory model has been partially constructed on the concept of “critical mass”: a threshold number (or percentage) of women in a legislature necessary for transforming the legislative context from one in which women-friendly policy is unlikely to one in which the opportunities for women's policy success are increased. If, as Mansbridge asserts, women's descriptive representation improves women's substantive representation, do increasing numbers of women in legislatures result in more and better public policy for women? Is there a critical mass of elected women that, once achieved, accelerates their policymaking opportunities? If so, what mechanisms explain such a transformation? Should activist women target a specific critical mass as a political strategy for advancing favorable legislation? The following four critical essays address these questions, taking in their different ways a critical perspective on the concept of critical mass.

Type
CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON GENDER AND POLITICS
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , December 2006 , pp. 491 - 492
Copyright
© 2006 The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association

Descriptive representation by gender improves substantive outcomes for women in every polity for which we have a measure. (Jane Mansbridge, “Quota Problems,” Politics & Gender 1 [December 2005]: 622)

Women's representation by elected women is a major research arena for scholars of women and politics. Comparativists and U.S. politics scholars, as well as feminist theorists, have given extensive attention to the question of whether or not women's political presence in legislatures is necessary for advancing policies favorable to women. Recent research and theorizing have sought to identify the conditions under which women-friendly policy might be advanced and the explanatory links between women's parliamentary presence and public policy outcomes. A key potential explanatory model has been partially constructed on the concept of “critical mass”: a threshold number (or percentage) of women in a legislature necessary for transforming the legislative context from one in which women-friendly policy is unlikely to one in which the opportunities for women's policy success are increased.

If, as Mansbridge asserts, women's descriptive representation improves women's substantive representation, do increasing numbers of women in legislatures result in more and better public policy for women? Is there a critical mass of elected women that, once achieved, accelerates their policymaking opportunities? If so, what mechanisms explain such a transformation? Should activist women target a specific critical mass as a political strategy for advancing favorable legislation? The following four critical essays address these questions, taking in their different ways a critical perspective on the concept of critical mass.

Numbers and Beyond: The Relevance of Critical Mass in Gender Research

Sandra Grey, Victoria University

The Substantive Representation of Women and PR: Some Reflections on the Role of Surrogate Representation and Critical Mass

Manon Tremblay, University of Ottawa

The Story of the Theory of Critical Mass

Drude Dahlerup, Stockholm University

Should Feminists Give Up on Critical Mass? A Contingent Yes

Sarah Childs, University of Bristol

Mona Lena Krook, Washington University in St. Louis