Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:00:48.638Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improving outcomes in necrotising otitis externa, telephone clinics, and topical pimecrolimus for chronic eczematous external otitis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2022

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Editorial
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED

Necrotising otitis externa is an aggressive infection of the external ear, the incidence of which is increasing.Reference Eweiss, Al-Aaraj, Sethukumar and Jama1Reference Rojoa, Raheman, Saman, Mettias, Das and Rea4 The optimal strategy for the diagnosis and management of necrotising otitis externa remains uncertain, and there is considerable variability in how the condition is managed.Reference Chawdhary, Pankhania, Douglas and Bottrill5,Reference Hopkins, Bennett, Henderson, MacSween, Baring and Sutherland6 Several articles in this month's issue of The Journal of Laryngology & Otology address this condition.Reference Stapleton and Watson7Reference Mohammed, Chean Khun Ng, Qureshi and Yates9

In a scoping review of necrotising otitis externa by Stapleton and Watson, the literature from 2011 to 2020 is reviewed and recommendations made for future research.Reference Stapleton and Watson7 A total of 217 studies were identified, with 60 being filtered into the final scoping review. Forty-three out of 60 studies (72 per cent) were retrospective case series, with no current level 1, 2 or 3 evidence for the diagnosis and management of necrotising otitis externa. The authors conclude that without an agreed framework of definitions and a standardised reporting dataset, published work remains heterogeneous, with a paucity of scientific analysis. This conclusion is supported by a further article by Hodgson et al. in this month's issue, who also conclude that a standardised case definition of necrotising otitis externa is needed to optimise diagnosis, management and research.Reference Hodgson, Sinclair, Arwyn-Jones, Oh, Nucken and Perenyei8 The UK Necrotising Otitis Externa Collaborative aims to establish consensus definitions to facilitate the diagnosis, management and outcomes of necrotising otitis externa in order to support clinical practice. In addition, a UK, multicentre, prospective observational study focused on improving necrotising otitis externa outcomes is currently underway (the Improving Outcomes of Necrotising Otitis Externa (‘IONOE’) study).

Telephone consultations and triage have rapidly increased in the out-patient setting because of the coronavirus pandemic.Reference Zammit, Siau, Williams and Hussein10Reference Hogan, Hintze, Fitzgerald, Javadpour, Rawluk and McConn13 Two further studies in this month's issue report the positive effects of telephone clinics as a method of service delivery.Reference Mallick, Balakumar and Drysdale14,Reference Rovira, Brar, Munroe-Gray, Ofo, Rodriguez and Kim15

Chronic eczematous external otitis can be challenging to manage. Nemeth et al., in a randomised, controlled trial in this month's issue, compare the effects of pimecrolimus against a moderate-potency topical steroid.Reference Nemeth, Verga and Verdolini16 The authors conclude that pimecrolimus is an effective treatment for eczematous external otitis and has a more favourable safety profile than topical steroids. A larger, high-powered study is required to explore further the full potential of pimecrolimus in eczematous external otitis cases.

References

Eweiss, AZ, Al-Aaraj, M, Sethukumar, P, Jama, G. Necrotising otitis externa: a serious condition becoming more frequently encountered. J Laryngol Otol 2022;136:386–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linton, S, Stapleton, E. Exploring theories for the exponential 16-year incidence rise of necrotising otitis externa in England. J Laryngol Otol 2022. Epub 2022 Jan 10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godbehere, J, Hutson, KH, Watson, GJ. Necrotising otitis externa: the increasing financial burden on the National Health Service. J Laryngol Otol 2021. Epub 2021 Nov 10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rojoa, DM, Raheman, FJ, Saman, Y, Mettias, B, Das, S, Rea, PA. Necrotising otitis externa – is a poor outcome predictable? The application of a diagnosis-based scoring system in patients with skull base osteomyelitis. J Laryngol Otol 2022;136:379–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chawdhary, G, Pankhania, M, Douglas, S, Bottrill, I. Current management of necrotising otitis externa in the UK: survey of 221 UK otolaryngologists. Acta Otolaryngol 2017;137:818–22CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopkins, ME, Bennett, A, Henderson, N, MacSween, KF, Baring, D, Sutherland, R. A retrospective review and multi-specialty, evidence-based guideline for the management of necrotising otitis externa. J Laryngol Otol 2020;134:487–92CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stapleton, E, Watson, G. Emerging themes in necrotising otitis externa: a scoping review of the literature from 2011 to 2020 and recommendations for future research. J Laryngol Otol 2022;136:575–81Google Scholar
Hodgson, SH, Sinclair, VJ, Arwyn-Jones, J, Oh, K, Nucken, K, Perenyei, M et al. Characteristics, management and outcome of a large necrotising otitis externa case series: need for standardised case definition. J Laryngol Otol 2022;136:604–10Google Scholar
Mohammed, H, Chean Khun Ng, J, Qureshi, MH, Yates, P. Necrotising otitis externa and how to reduce length of hospital stay: a complete audit cycle of 77 hospital admissions. J Laryngol Otol 2022;136:668–73Google Scholar
Zammit, M, Siau, R, Williams, C, Hussein, A. Patient satisfaction from ENT telephone consultations during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. J Laryngol Otol 2020;134:992–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, R, Collins, L, Kerr, B, Gray, G, Devlin, B, Black, M et al. A review of telephone consultations for head and neck cancer follow up: a patient satisfaction survey. J Laryngol Otol 2021;135:815–19CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banerjee, S, Voliotidis, D, Parvin, L, Rama, SPK. Telephone triage of suspected head and neck cancer patients during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic using the Head and Neck Cancer Risk Calculator version 2. J Laryngol Otol 2021;135:241–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hogan, S, Hintze, J, Fitzgerald, C, Javadpour, M, Rawluk, D, McConn, Walsh R. The role of a virtual telephone clinic in the follow-up management of lateral skull base tumours. J Laryngol Otol 2020;134:1081–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mallick, S, Balakumar, R, Drysdale, A. Telephone clinic outcomes during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: results from an ENT department. J Laryngol Otol 2022;136:611–14Google Scholar
Rovira, A, Brar, S, Munroe-Gray, T, Ofo, E, Rodriguez, C, Kim, D. Telephone consultation for two-week-wait ENT and head and neck cancer referrals: initial evaluation including patient satisfaction. J Laryngol Otol 2022;136:615–21Google Scholar
Nemeth, Z, Verga, E, Verdolini, R. Topical treatment of eczematous external otitis involving the ear canal: long-term results of a trial comparing pimecrolimus 1 per cent versus clobetasone butyrate 0.05 per cent. J Laryngol Otol 2022;136:635–38Google Scholar