Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T05:52:10.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The association of parathyroid hormone with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin during pregnancy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2023

Elham Kazemian
Affiliation:
Non-communicable Diseases Research Center, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran Endocrine Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Elham Madreseh
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Fereidoun Azizi
Affiliation:
Endocrine Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Sepideh Ashrafivand
Affiliation:
Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Shohada Tajrish Educational Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Soraya Saleh Gargari
Affiliation:
Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Shohada Tajrish Educational Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Mohammad Ali Mansournia
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Carol L. Wagner
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Shawn Jenkins Children's Hospital, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
Atieh Amouzegar*
Affiliation:
Endocrine Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
*
*Corresponding author: Atieh Amouzegar, email amouzegar@endocrine.ac.ir

Abstract

It is currently debated whether vitamin D requirements during pregnancy differ from those during non-gravid states. In current analyses, we aimed to determine the best model for the association between PTH and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) and the threshold for circulating 25(OH)D at which serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) is suppressed. This multicenter prospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 227 Iranian pregnant women aged 15–45 years in their third trimester of pregnancy. The locally weighted smoothing scatter plot (LOWESS) was used to determine the curvilinear shape of the 25(OH)D/PTH relationship. Linear and non-linear methods were employed to determine the best fit and cut-point for serum 25(OH)D concentration. The median serum 25(OH)D and corresponding serum PTH concentration were 17⋅26 (13⋅44–23⋅08) ng/ml and 19⋅46 (15⋅08–25⋅04) pg/ml in our study population, respectively. The LOWESS curve suggested a non-linear and monotonic with a negative slope relation between PTH (pg/ml) and serum 25(OH)D (ng/ml). The optimal model for the association between PTH and serum 25(OH)D was a one-term fractional polynomial (FP1) (AIC = 1640⋅463). The FP1 analysis identified the 25(OH)D threshold of 12⋅48 ng/ml at which serum PTH rapidly rose. The expected degree of PTH stimulation seems to have a linear trend as 25(OH)D falls below 40 ng/ml. 25(OH)D (ng/ml) and PTH (pg/ml) had a non-linear and monotonic relationship with a negative slope. Our data suggest that a 25(OH)D threshold of 12⋅48 ng/ml is sufficient for parathyroid hormone suppression, which could be used to screen for deficient individuals.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

Introduction

Pregnancy is a critical period of life during which a balanced intake of micronutrients and macronutrients is necessary for the prevention of maternal malnutrition and normal fetal growth and development(Reference Keats, Haider and Tam1). Pregnant mothers experience significant anatomical and physiological changes to nurture and accommodate the developing fetus, altering their nutrient requirements(Reference Tsakiridis, Kasapidou and Dagklis2). In spite of the widespread use of prenatal vitamins, maternal vitamin D deficiency is common during pregnancy(Reference Marangoni, Cetin and Verduci3). Vitamin D deficiency is reported to be associated with different adverse health outcomes in mothers, e.g. pre-eclampsia and preterm delivery(Reference Merewood, Mehta and Chen4,Reference Scholl, Chen and Stein5) , and in their offspring, such as neonatal hypocalcemia, impaired skeletal development, respiratory infections, allergic diseases, obesity and type 1 diabetes during the early years of life(Reference Marangoni, Cetin and Verduci3,Reference Javaid, Crozier and Harvey6Reference Christensen, Søndergaard and Fisker9) . In pregnancy, vitamin D requirements are likely greater than in a non-pregnant state(Reference Mithal and Kalra10,Reference Specker11) . This raises questions about the threshold to be considered sufficient for vitamin D status during pregnancy or the range for normal vitamin D function. An important part of this debate relies on inconsistencies regarding which indicators should be considered to determine maternal vitamin D status.

Biological interaction between circulating vitamin D and its upstream regulator, serum parathyroid hormone (PTH), has been proposed in view of uncertainty about outcomes(Reference Kramer, Ye and Hanley12). As vitamin D is responsible for calcium absorption through diet, even mild vitamin D deficiencies can be compensated to maintain normal calcium availability(Reference Carnevale, Nieddu and Romagnoli13). Therefore, considering the classic endocrine function of vitamin D and its effects on calcium and bone metabolism, the biological interaction between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) and PTH is commonly used to define the normal range of circulating 25(OH)D for calcium and bone metabolism(Reference Kramer, Ye and Hanley12,Reference Carnevale, Nieddu and Romagnoli13) . In particular, the serum 25(OH)D status is determined by the point at which serum PTH begins to rise or is suppressed(Reference Carnevale, Nieddu and Romagnoli13,Reference Aloia, Talwar and Pollack14) . One question is to evaluate how circulating 25(OH)D correlates with PTH in pregnancy. To our knowledge, only a few studies investigated the association between 25(OH)D and PTH among pregnant women(Reference Kramer, Ye and Hanley12,Reference Haddow, Neveux and Palomaki15,Reference Hysaj, Marqués-Gallego and Richard16) . Based on a cohort of pregnant women, the threshold level of 25(OH)D needed to suppress PTH in pregnancy was similar to that found in postpartum women, despite the different shape of this relationship(Reference Kramer, Ye and Hanley12). Another cross-sectional study by Haddow et al. indicated a weaker association of PTH/25(OH)D in pregnant women than in non-pregnant individuals(Reference Haddow, Neveux and Palomaki15). Furthermore, since vitamin D is optimal for PTH suppression and bone and mineral metabolism varies among ethnic groups(Reference Aloia17,Reference Gutiérrez, Farwell and Kermah18) , such investigations should ideally be conducted in different ethnic groups and regions. Therefore, in this cross-sectional study, we aimed to assess the PTH/25(OH)D relation and the optimal 25(OH)D concentration at which PTH is suppressed in a subgroup of Iranian pregnant women for the first time.

Material and methods

Study subjects

This was a multicenter prospective, cross-sectional study conducted on 227 pregnant women aged 15–45 years. We recruited pregnant women in the third trimester for the present study due to the greater importance of vitamin D status for fetal bone growth and optimal maternal and fetal health during this time(Reference Mulligan, Felton and Riek19). In addition, infant cord 25(OH)D concentration is most strongly correlated with maternal status towards the end of the third trimester and had almost no correlation with maternal status before 20 weeks gestation(Reference Wheeler, Taylor and de Lange20). Moreover, a weaker association of PTH/25(OH)D in the first trimester may make it an unreliable determinant for estimating vitamin D deficiency(Reference Haddow, Neveux and Palomaki15). Pregnant women who attended antenatal care services and were willing to participate in the present study were enrolled between March 2013 and March 2014. All hospitals with obstetrics and gynecology wards in Tehran were stratified based on their socioeconomic status and location. A stratified systematic sampling method was used to select a centre that best represented the location and socioeconomic characteristics of each stratum, including Mostafa Khomeini (Centre of Tehran), Mahdieh (South of Tehran), Shohadaye Tajrish (North of Tehran), Bahman and Arash (West and East of Tehran). Participants from each stratum were selected based on the proportion of hospital admissions. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) history of parathyroid or adrenal gland disorders, granulomatous disease, renal dysfunction, hypoalbuminemia, thyrotoxicosis, sepsis, chemotherapy and blood transfusion; (2) the use of magnesium sulphate, lithium or thiazide medications; and (3) vitamin A intake ≥3000 μg/d and vitamin D ≥4000 IU/d. The final analysis was carried out in 227 women after excluding subjects who had abnormal PTH (<9 pg/ml) and calcium levels (≥10⋅5 mg/dl) (n 6) and individuals with missing values (n 1).

Study measurements

Information regarding age, education, socioeconomic status, history of diseases, parity, gravidity, calcium and vitamin D intake from food and supplement and multivitamin consumption and dosage during pregnancy, exposure to sunlight(Reference Holick, Siris and Binkley21) and physical activity(Reference Sesso, Paffenbarger and Lee22) during pregnancy were obtained through an interview-administered questionnaire.

Anthropometric measurement

Anthropometric measurements, including pregnancy height and weight, were measured at recruitment. Height was measured using the Secastadiometer without footwear and head facing forward. Body weight was determined to the nearest 0⋅1 kg, without shoes in light indoor clothing, using a portable digital scale. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated by dividing weight in kilogram by height in metres squared. Weight gain during pregnancy was determined by subtracting pre-pregnancy weight from the weight measured at study recruitment.

Physical activity assessment

Physical activity during the last month was assessed by the questionnaire comprising nine questions regarding time spent in sitting position, walking, regular daily and sports activities besides six questions about physical demands of their job as well as light and heavy lifting on a regular working day. Total physical activity was reported as Metabolic Equivalent Task per kilogram per hour (kcal/kg/h)(Reference Jette, Sidney and Blumchen23).

Sun exposure assessment

Sun exposure was assessed by a questionnaire including questions regarding hours of outdoor activities and body surface area exposed to sunlight while outdoors, sunscreen use and type of Islamic clothing.

Laboratory measurements

A fasting venous blood sample was collected from each participant at recruitment in the third trimester of pregnancy. All laboratory measurements were carried out at the Research Institute for Endocrine Science (RIES) laboratory. Serum calcium and phosphorous were measured by photometric methods. Intact PTH and 25(OH)D concentrations were determined by the electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) method, using Roche Diagnostics kits and the Roche/Hitachi Cobas e-411 analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). All intra- and inter-assay CVs were <2⋅6 for PTH and <7⋅5 for 25(OH)D concentrations.

Statistical analyses

The Shapiro–Wilk's test was used to determine whether variables were normally distributed in this cohort of Iranian women. The preliminary analyses were conducted using a locally weighted smoothing scatter plot (LOWESS) to determine the curvilinear shape of the relationship. Also, linear and non-linear methods (i.e. univariate fractional polynomial (FP), regression spline and segmented regression) were used to determine the best fit and cut-point for serum 25(OH)D concentration. The cut-off values for circulating 25(OH)D were determined as the circulating 25(OH)D levels at which serum PTH is maximally suppressed or rapidly raised. The model with the lowest Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) value was considered the best fit.

In the secondary analyses, the 25(OH)D-specific PTH reference intervals and calcium-specific PTH percentiles were estimated using the normal-based methodology described by Royston and Wright(Reference Royston and Wright24). This parametric approach is an extension of normal distribution considering skewness and kurtosis and is a robust methodology with efficient estimates.

Since the PTH had a non-Gaussian distribution, the modulus exponential-normal (MEN) 4-parameter model was used to provide a much more improved fit. A normal plot of the Z-scores was used to determine the goodness of fit of the MEN model.

In addition, we determined the threshold of circulating 25(OH)D based on the development of a composite of adverse pregnancy outcomes, including pre-eclampsia, pregnancy hypertension, gestational diabetes mellitus, severe nausea and vomiting during pregnancy, premature rupture of membranes (PROM) and premature delivery. Study participants were divided whether they developed adverse maternal outcomes. χ 2 and independent t tests were first used to compare the serum vitamin D status of groups. In addition, we performed logistic regression analysis to evaluate the association between mothers’ vitamin D status and developing an adverse event during pregnancy after adjustment for potential confounders, including age, sun exposure, anthropometric measurement and physical activity. Finally, a receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was employed to determine the threshold and diagnostic ability of serum 25(OH)D concentrations to develop adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, this was an exploratory analysis, and considering adverse pregnancy events as a composite outcome for determining vitamin D outcome was not our primary goal. All statistical analyses were performed using Stata version 13.0 and MedCalc.

Results

The baseline characteristics of the study participants are shown in Table 1. The study population comprised 227 pregnant women with median maternal and gestational age of 28 (26–31) years and 39 (38–39) weeks, respectively. The median serum 25(OH)D concentration was 17⋅26 (13⋅44–23⋅08) ranged from 4⋅33 to 50⋅88 ng/ml, and the corresponding serum intact PTH level was 19⋅46 (15⋅08–25⋅04) pg/ml. Considering the cut-off value of circulating 25(OH)D ≤12⋅48 ng/ml as vitamin D deficiency based on the best fit model for PTH/25(OH)D relation in our data, 45 (20 %) women were considered to be vitamin D-deficient. Whereas, according to available guidelines that suggest a 25(OH)D level <20 ng/ml for vitamin D deficiency(Reference LeBlanc, Chou and Zakher25), 70 % (159) of the study participants had vitamin D deficiency. We noted higher circulating 25(OH)D concentration in women exposed to sunlight ≥15 compared with <15 min/d (17⋅69 ± 6⋅88 v. 22⋅1 ± 6⋅93 ng/ml, P-value 0⋅001) and 203 (89 %) of study participants had sun exposure > 15 min/d. Forty-four (18 %) subjects regularly used calcium-vitamin D supplements, and 144 (63 %) took a multivitamin supplement.

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of study participants

MET, Metabolic equivalent of task; PTH, Parathyroid hormone; 25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D.

Values are presented as median (Q1, Q3) and categorical variables are presents as n (% per row).

Spearman correlation showed an inverse relationship between serum 25(OH)D concentration and PTH (Spearman's r = −0⋅233, P-value < 0⋅001). The LOWESS curve also suggested a non-linear and monotonic with a negative slope relation between PTH and serum 25(OH)D (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Plot of original data with the locally weighted smoothing scatter plot (LOWESS) model curve (a) and fractional polynomial with power = −2 (b). PTH, parathyroid hormone; 25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D.

The cut-off value of vitamin D deficiency was defined as the circulating 25(OH)D levels at which serum PTH is maximally suppressed or rapidly raised. Therefore, segmented regression and FP analyses were employed to estimate the best model for the association between PTH and serum 25(OH)D and the circulating 25(OH)D threshold. The non-nested model selection was performed based on the minimum Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) as the criteria for the goodness of fit and model complexity. Six segmented regression models were constructed as follows: (1) Linear–linear model (Threshold = 10⋅34, AIC = 1748⋅365); (2) Exponential–linear model (Threshold = 10⋅33, AIC = 1748⋅369); (3) Linear mode model–plateau (Threshold = 10⋅48, AIC = 1748⋅612); (4) Exponential model–plateau (Threshold = 10⋅47, AIC = 1748⋅612); (5) Quadratic–linear model (Threshold = 10⋅34, AIC = 1750⋅365) and (6) Quadratic model–plateau model (Threshold = 10⋅48, AIC = 1750⋅611).

In FP models, for both one-term FP1 and two-term FP2 models, the best possible choice of powers was −2 in FP1. This selection was based on likelihood ratio tests. The fitted FP model was:

$$\eqalign{& PTH\approx A + B( 25( {{\rm OH}} ) {\rm D}) ^{{-}2} \cr & \matrix{ {} & {} \cr }\quad\!\! = 20.05 + 9 .72( ( 25( {{\rm OH}} ) {\rm D}/10) ^{{-}2} - 0{\rm .3) }} $$

Where the estimated effects (and standard error) were: A = 20⋅05 (0⋅63), B = 9⋅72 (1⋅11) and the unit for 25(OH)D was ng/ml. For this model, the cut-point (a point in the PTH-25(OH)D curve at which PTH is maximally suppressed) was approximated by calculating the point at which the change (Δ) in PTH per unit change in 25(OH)D was approximately zero. ΔPTH ≈ 0 when Δ PTH was considered 1/0000th of the sd for PTH, i.e. 10⋅42/100 000 ≈ 0⋅001 pg/ml. This approach indicated the estimated cut-point of 12⋅48 ng/ml (|( − 2B/10Δ)1/3|).

Our findings showed that the optimal model was one-term FP1 with the 25(OH)D threshold of 12⋅48 ng/ml (AIC = 1640⋅463) (Table 2).

Table 2. Models for the association between 25(OH)D and PTH and estimated 25(OH)D threshold at which PTH stimulates to increase

FP1, One-term fractional polynomial; 25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D; AIC, Akaike's information criterion.

The expected percentage change in serum PTH compared with PTH when 25(OH)D = 40 ng/ml is depicted in Fig. 2. The degree of PTH stimulation declines as the concentration of 25(OH)D rises until it reaches an optimal level (10, 12 ng/ml), and then, it gradually approaches zero. For example, a 40 or 20 % increase in serum PTH was expected at 25(OH)D concentration of 10 and 12 ng/ml, respectively, compared with the PTH level at 25(OH)D concentration of 40 ng/ml.

Fig. 2. Degree of PTH stimulation at different levels of 25(OH)D, shown as the expected percentage change in serum PTH compared with PTH when 25(OH)D is 40 ng/ml during third trimester of pregnancy. PTH, parathyroid hormone; 25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D.

Table 3 shows the estimated 25(OH)D and calcium categories-specific PTH values for 2·5th, 5th, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th, 95th and 97·5th centiles (95 % confidence interval) based on non-parametric models. Using the 2·5th and the 97·5th percentiles for calculating reference intervals in the 25(OH)D <10 ng/ml, 10 < 25(OH)D <20 ng/ml, 20 < 25(OH)D <30 ng/ml and 25(OH)D >30 ng/ml categories, resulted in (11·5–89·45), (11·25–40·71), (11·20–34·57) and (13·93–27·12) pg/ml for PTH.

Table 3. Observed PTH centile and 95 % CI based on 25(OH)D and calcium categories

* Binomial method was used for calculating confidence intervals.

PTH, parathyroid hormone; 25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D; CI, confidence interval.

Using the 2·5th and the 97·5th percentiles for calculating reference intervals in the calcium <9·32 mg/dl, 9·32 < calcium <9·61 mg/dl, 9·61 < calcium <9·89 mg/dl and calcium >9·89 mg/dl quantiles resulted in (11·11–55·43), (11·29–47·05), (11·6–78·06) and (11·29–52·27) pg/ml for PTH.

Corresponding PTH percentiles for each level of 25(OH)D and calcium based on MEN models are plotted in Fig. 3. The 2·5th and 97·5th percentile values of PTH decreased significantly with increasing circulating 25(OH)D concentrations (Fig. 3(a)), while did not fluctuate with increasing calcium (Fig. 3(b)).

Fig. 3. Trend of PTH percentiles (2·5th, 5th, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th, 95th and 97·5th) in pregnant women as a function of the 25(OH)D (a) and calcium (b), resulted from modulus exponential-normal (MEN) models. PTH, parathyroid hormone; 25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D.

Our findings showed no significant association between circulating 25(OH)D concentration and development of composite adverse outcomes during pregnancy either in an unadjusted analysis or after adjustment for age, sun exposure, anthropometric measurement and physical activity (results are not shown). The ROC curve analysis to determine the threshold of serum 25(OH)D concentrations for developing adverse pregnancy outcomes identified the value of 18·45 ng/ml (Fig. 4). However, the area under the curve (AUC) for the ROC curve plot in current data was 0·563, indicating that the occurrence of adverse outcomes during pregnancy was not properly predicted by vitamin D status in our study population.

Fig. 4. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration to discriminate between maternal vitamin D sufficiency and deficiency.

Discussion

The LOWESS curve suggested a non-linear and monotonic with a negative slope relation between PTH and serum 25(OH)D. The segmented regression and FP analyses were employed to determine the best model for the association between serum PTH and 25(OH)D concentrations. According to our results, the best model to predict endocrine vitamin D function in pregnancy was FP1 with a 25(OH)D threshold of 12·48 ng/ml at which serum PTH rapidly rose. We observed approximately a linear trend between serum PTH and 25(OH)D when serum 25(OH)D falls below 40 ng/ml. In a study by Hysaj et al., 25(OH)D level of 18·9 ng/ml was suggested as an inflection point for the maximal suppression of PTH among pregnant Swiss women(Reference Hysaj, Marqués-Gallego and Richard16). It appears ethnicity and resident region may affect the threshold for vitamin D deficiency among pregnant women. In another study in Iranian adolescents aged 10–16 years, the cut-off points for mild, moderate, and severe vitamin D deficiency based on 25(OH)D/PTH relation was 33, 21 and 13 ng/ml, respectively, which was comparable to 12·48 ng/ml in our analysis(Reference Talaei, Yadegari and Rafee26). However, other factors such as BMI, season and age assumed to affect this relation, should also be considered(Reference Kramer, Ye and Hanley12,Reference Haddow, Neveux and Palomaki15,Reference Ortigosa Gómez, García-Algar and Mur Sierra27,Reference Melin, Wilske and Ringertz28) .

The ROC curve analysis suggested the occurrence of composite adverse pregnancy outcomes was not a good discriminator for defining vitamin D deficiency in our study population. Clinical endpoint such as the history of falls and risk of fracture and chronic disease as well as assessment of the maximal suppression of PTH by 25(OH)D are suggested as indicators to evaluate the optimal serum 25(OH)D levels(Reference Durazo-Arvizu, Dawson-Hughes and Sempos29). It should be kept in mind that vitamin D deficiency should be diagnosed before developing adverse health outcomes, as most individuals with vitamin D deficiency are unaware of their serum vitamin D levels. Therefore, the thresholds for vitamin D deficiency should be established by determining which outcomes could best predict deficiency, assuming to improve the health of individuals with low 25(OH)D levels. In our study, developing a composite of adverse outcomes during pregnancy was not a suitable indicator for determining the cut-point to discriminate between vitamin D deficiency and sufficiency. However, it should be mentioned that assessing adverse outcomes during pregnancy was not our primary goal. Owing to that, our small sample size may lead to insufficient power of the current investigation to detect the association between adverse pregnancy outcomes during pregnancy and 25(OH)D concentration. Yet, controversies continue concerning which outcomes should be considered to define optimal serum 25(OH)D levels.

During pregnancy, maternal intestinal calcium absorption is enhanced to provide calcium requirement for the developing fetus(Reference Kovacs30). Correspondingly, the association between serum PTH and 25(OH)D during gestation may be distinct from the relation of the non-gravid state(Reference Kramer, Ye and Hanley12,Reference Haddow, Neveux and Palomaki15,Reference Kovacs31) . For example, a study by Haddow et al. indicated a relationship between PTH and 25(OH)D was weaker in early pregnancy than in non-pregnant adults(Reference Haddow, Neveux and Palomaki15). However, the inverse association between PTH and 25(OH)D has been shown in other studies conducted in pregnant adults and adolescents(Reference Kramer, Ye and Hanley12,Reference Hysaj, Marqués-Gallego and Richard16,Reference Morley, Carlin and Pasco32Reference Hamilton, McNeil and Hollis34) . In our population, the LOWESS curve documented a non-linear and monotonic with a negative slope relation between PTH and serum 25(OH)D, which was similar to curvilinear fits employed to model this relation among third-trimester pregnant women in a study by Hysaj et al. (Reference Hysaj, Marqués-Gallego and Richard16). Furthermore, our findings demonstrated a linear trend in the degree of PTH stimulation as 25(OH)D falls below 40 ng/ml. Therefore, it is proposed that PTH secretion is elevated in response to 25(OH)D deficiency to meet the calcium demands of both the mother and the fetus(Reference Young, McNanley and Cooper33).

There is a clinical need to define a threshold 25(OH)D concentration below which serum PTH is no longer suppressed and considered an endocrine indicator of physiological vitamin D insufficiency. This cut-point in our data was determined on FP1 analysis with the 25(OH)D threshold of 12·48 ng/ml below which serum PTH rapidly rose, which is near to cut-points previously identified in non-pregnant adults(Reference Durazo-Arvizu, Dawson-Hughes and Sempos29). Nevertheless, a study by Kramer et al., conducted among Canadian women in their late pregnancy revealed a linear association between 25(OH)D and PTH up to a 25(OH)D threshold of 82 nmol/l, below which PTH was no longer suppressed(Reference Kramer, Ye and Hanley12). Whereas, in a study by Haddow et al., a weak PTH and 25(OH)D relationship suggested that threshold analysis is unreliable for determining vitamin D status during pregnancy(Reference Haddow, Neveux and Palomaki15). Different vitamin D deficiency thresholds documented by studies may be explained by racial differences in PTH/25(OH)D relationship. For example, in a study by Okonofua et al., lower concentrations of 25(OH)D in Asian women were accompanied by only a minimal increase in PTH levels compared with their Caucasian counterparts, likely due to the fact that low levels of 25(OH)D in Asian women could be partially compensated by higher synthesis of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2 D)(Reference Okonofua, Menon and Houlder35). Additionally, it is possible that the pattern of relationship between 25(OH)D and PTH observed in our pregnant population was driven by the high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among Tehranian residents(Reference Tabrizi, Moosazadeh and Akbari36). A cross-sectional study by Haddow et al. noted an inverse association of PTH with 25(OH)D concentrations during early pregnancy among African American women when 25(OH)D <20 ng/ml(Reference Haddow, Neveux and Palomaki15). It should also be noted that 25(OH)D was measured in the third trimester of pregnancy in our study while others measured it earlier in pregnancy, which may contribute to different association patterns of serum 25(OH)D and PTH levels observed in various studies. However, the underlying mechanism on how race or a lower 25(OH)D status may contribute to discrepancies between studies should be investigated in future studies.

This is the first study to assess the PTH/25(OH)D relation as well as optimal 25(OH)D concentration among a subgroup of Iranian pregnant women. In the current analyses, we applied rigorous statistical modelling to determine the best fit for the PTH/25(OH)D relation in a subgroup of pregnant women. One limitation of this study is its cross-sectional design with single time point measurement during the third trimester of pregnancy. We could not determine whether the observed association was a feature of the study population or gestation. In addition, we did not assess the relationship between serum 25(OH)D and PTH in early and mid-pregnancy, which may differ from late pregnancy. Furthermore, our study did not have enough power to detect the effect of vitamin D status on pregnancy comorbidities. Lastly, we did not measure the dietary intake of vitamin D and calcium. However, it should be noted that there are a few naturally occurring food sources of vitamin D and vitamin D is mostly obtained from dietary supplements in the Iranian diet(Reference Ross, Taylor and Yaktine37,Reference Nikooyeh and Neyestani38) . However, sun exposure, which is considered to be the main source of vitamin D, was considered in the current analyses. Future longitudinal studies with a larger sample size initiated in the first trimester of pregnancy to provide comprehensive insight into non-endocrine aspects of vitamin D during pregnancy are suggested.

In brief, in a subgroup of Iranian women with significant and often profound vitamin D deficiency evaluated at the start of the third trimester, the shape of the relationship between 25(OH)D and PTH was non-linear and monotonic with a negative slope. Our findings showed that the optimal model of PTH/25(OH)D relation was a one-term FP1. According to FP1 analysis, the vitamin D deficiency cut-point for the classical endocrine function using serum PTH as a marker was the 25(OH)D threshold of 12·48 ng/ml, at which serum PTH quickly rose. These analyses suggest that low 25(OH)D may result in PTH synthesis, which increases bone resorption in pregnant women to meet maternal and fetal calcium requirements. These findings contribute to a growing body of evidence regarding calcitropic hormone responses during pregnancy. Establishing thresholds for vitamin D deficiency among this vulnerable group of individuals would allow them to undergo screening and identify deficient individuals early before developing adverse health outcomes associated with vitamin D deficiency.

Acknowledgements

The research team would like to acknowledge the study participants whose contribution made the study possible.

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

E. K. carried out interpretation and wrote the manuscript. E. M. carried out statistical analyses. F. A. supervised the study and assisted in writing the manuscript. S. A. administered the project and assisted in writing manuscript. S. S. G. supervised project and edited the manuscript. M. M. assisted in statistical analyses and methodology. C. L. W. and A. A. supervised the project, and assisted in interpretation and in writing the manuscript.

The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board (IRB) and medical ethics committee of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (ethics code: 15ECRIES92/10/25). All the patients were provided written informed consent form before inclusion in the study and the study was conducted according to the criteria set by the declaration of Helsinki.

Footnotes

Elham Kazemian and Elham Madreseh contributed equally to this work as co-first authors.

References

Keats, EC, Haider, BA, Tam, E, et al. (2019) Multiple-micronutrient supplementation for women during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3, CD004905.Google ScholarPubMed
Tsakiridis, I, Kasapidou, E, Dagklis, T, et al. (2020) Nutrition in pregnancy: a comparative review of major guidelines. Obstet Gynecol Surv 75, 692702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marangoni, F, Cetin, I, Verduci, E, et al. (2016) Maternal diet and nutrient requirements in pregnancy and breastfeeding: an Italian consensus document. Nutrients 8, 629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merewood, A, Mehta, SD, Chen, TC, et al. (2009) Association between vitamin D deficiency and primary cesarean section. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94, 940945.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scholl, TO, Chen, X & Stein, TP (2013) Vitamin D, secondary hyperparathyroidism, and preeclampsia. Am J Clin Nutr 98, 787793.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Javaid, MK, Crozier, SR, Harvey, NC, et al. (2006) Maternal vitamin D status during pregnancy and childhood bone mass at age 9 years: a longitudinal study. Lancet 367, 3643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhu, K, Whitehouse, AJ, Hart, PH, et al. (2014) Maternal vitamin D status during pregnancy and bone mass in offspring at 20 years of age: a prospective cohort study. J Bone Miner Res 29, 10881095.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crozier, SR, Harvey, NC, Inskip, HM, et al. (2012) Maternal vitamin D status in pregnancy is associated with adiposity in the offspring: findings from the Southampton Women's Survey. Am J Clin Nutr 96, 5763.Google ScholarPubMed
Christensen, N, Søndergaard, J, Fisker, N, et al. (2017) Infant respiratory tract infections or wheeze and maternal vitamin D in pregnancy: a systematic review. Pediatr Infect Dis J 36, 384391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mithal, A & Kalra, S (2014) Vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 18, 593596.Google ScholarPubMed
Specker, BL (2012) Does vitamin D during pregnancy impact offspring growth and bone? Proc Nutr Soc 71, 3845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kramer, CK, Ye, C, Hanley, AJ, et al. (2016) The relationship between parathyroid hormone and 25-hydroxyvitamin D during and after pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 101, 17291736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carnevale, V, Nieddu, L, Romagnoli, E, et al. (2010) Regulation of PTH secretion by 25-hydroxyvitamin D and ionized calcium depends on vitamin D status: a study in a large cohort of healthy subjects. Bone 47, 626630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aloia, JF, Talwar, SA, Pollack, S, et al. (2006) Optimal vitamin D status and serum parathyroid hormone concentrations in African American women. Am J Clin Nutr 84, 602609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haddow, JE, Neveux, LM, Palomaki, GE, et al. (2011) The relationship between PTH and 25-hydroxy vitamin D early in pregnancy. Clin Endocrinol 75, 309314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hysaj, O, Marqués-Gallego, P, Richard, A, et al. (2021) Parathyroid hormone in pregnancy: vitamin D and other determinants. Nutrients 13, 360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aloia, JF (2008) African Americans, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, and osteoporosis: a paradox. Am J Clin Nutr 88, 545S550S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gutiérrez, OM, Farwell, WR, Kermah, D, et al. (2011) Racial differences in the relationship between vitamin D, bone mineral density, and parathyroid hormone in the national health and nutrition examination survey. Osteoporos Int 22, 17451753.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mulligan, ML, Felton, SK, Riek, AE, et al. (2010) Implications of vitamin D deficiency in pregnancy and lactation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202, 429.e1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wheeler, BJ, Taylor, BJ, de Lange, M, et al. (2018) A longitudinal study of 25-hydroxy vitamin D and parathyroid hormone status throughout pregnancy and exclusive lactation in New Zealand mothers and their infants at 45° S. Nutrients 10, 86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holick, MF, Siris, ES, Binkley, N, et al. (2005) Prevalence of vitamin D inadequacy among postmenopausal North American women receiving osteoporosis therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90, 32153224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sesso, HD, Paffenbarger, RS Jr. & Lee, IM (2000) Physical activity and coronary heart disease in men: the Harvard Alumni Health Study. Circulation 102, 975980.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jette, M, Sidney, K & Blumchen, G (1990) Metabolic equivalents (METS) in exercise testing, exercise prescription, and evaluation of functional capacity. Clin Cardiol 13, 555565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royston, P & Wright, EM (1998) How to construct ‘normal ranges’ for fetal variables. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 11, 3038.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LeBlanc, E, Chou, R, Zakher, B, et al. (2014) U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Evidence Syntheses, Formerly Systematic Evidence Reviews. Screening for Vitamin D Deficiency: Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US).Google Scholar
Talaei, A, Yadegari, N, Rafee, M, et al. (2012) Prevalence and cut-off point of vitamin D deficiency among secondary students of Arak, Iran in 2010. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 16, 786790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ortigosa Gómez, S, García-Algar, O, Mur Sierra, A, et al. (2015) Sociodemographic factors related to plasma concentrations of 25-OH vitamin D and PTH in cord blood. Rev Esp Salud Publica 89, 7583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melin, A, Wilske, J, Ringertz, H, et al. (2001) Seasonal variations in serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and parathyroid hormone but no detectable change in femoral neck bone density in an older population with regular outdoor exposure. J Am Geriatr Soc 49, 11901196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durazo-Arvizu, RA, Dawson-Hughes, B, Sempos, CT, et al. (2010) Three-phase model harmonizes estimates of the maximal suppression of parathyroid hormone by 25-hydroxyvitamin D in persons 65 years of age and older. J Nutr 140, 595599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kovacs, CS (2013) Maternal vitamin D deficiency: fetal and neonatal implications. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 18, 129135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kovacs, CS (2008) Vitamin D in pregnancy and lactation: maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes from human and animal studies. Am J Clin Nutr 88, 520S528S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morley, R, Carlin, JB, Pasco, JA, et al. (2006) Maternal 25-hydroxyvitamin D and parathyroid hormone concentrations and offspring birth size. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91, 906912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, BE, McNanley, TJ, Cooper, EM, et al. (2012) Vitamin D insufficiency is prevalent and vitamin D is inversely associated with parathyroid hormone and calcitriol in pregnant adolescents. J Bone Miner Res 27, 177186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, SA, McNeil, R, Hollis, BW, et al. (2010) Profound vitamin D deficiency in a diverse group of women during pregnancy living in a Sun-rich environment at latitude 32°N. Int J Endocrinol 2010, 917428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okonofua, F, Menon, RK, Houlder, S, et al. (1987) Calcium, vitamin D and parathyroid hormone relationships in pregnant Caucasian and Asian women and their neonates. Ann Clin Biochem 24, 2228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabrizi, R, Moosazadeh, M, Akbari, M, et al. (2018) High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among Iranian population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Iran J Med Sci 43, 125139.Google ScholarPubMed
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee to Review Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin D and Calcium; Ross, AC, Taylor, CL, Yaktine, AL, et al. , (eds) (2011) Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK56070/. doi: 10.17226/13050Google ScholarPubMed
Nikooyeh, B & Neyestani, T (2018) Efficacy of food fortification with vitamin D in Iranian adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr Food Sci Res 5, 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of study participants

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Plot of original data with the locally weighted smoothing scatter plot (LOWESS) model curve (a) and fractional polynomial with power = −2 (b). PTH, parathyroid hormone; 25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D.

Figure 2

Table 2. Models for the association between 25(OH)D and PTH and estimated 25(OH)D threshold at which PTH stimulates to increase

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Degree of PTH stimulation at different levels of 25(OH)D, shown as the expected percentage change in serum PTH compared with PTH when 25(OH)D is 40 ng/ml during third trimester of pregnancy. PTH, parathyroid hormone; 25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D.

Figure 4

Table 3. Observed PTH centile and 95 % CI based on 25(OH)D and calcium categories

Figure 5

Fig. 3. Trend of PTH percentiles (2·5th, 5th, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th, 95th and 97·5th) in pregnant women as a function of the 25(OH)D (a) and calcium (b), resulted from modulus exponential-normal (MEN) models. PTH, parathyroid hormone; 25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D.

Figure 6

Fig. 4. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration to discriminate between maternal vitamin D sufficiency and deficiency.