Genistein, a natural isoflavone phyto-oestrogen present in soyabeans, has a chemical structure similar to that of steroidal oestrogens, and its ability to behave as an oestrogen in various tissues has been widely describedReference Makiewicz, Garey, Adlercreutz and Gurpide1, Reference Ju, Allred, Allred, Karko, Doerge and Helferich2. Genistein has been found to have significant oestrogenic properties in both in vitro and in vivo studies. Physiological concentrations (10− 9–10− 6 m) of genistein stimulate the growth of oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer cellsReference Hsieh, Santell, Haslam and Helferich3, Reference Dees, Foster, Ahamed and Wimalasena4. In ovariectomised athymic mice implanted with MCF-7 cells, both genistein and soya protein stimulate tumour growth in a dose-dependent fashionReference Ju, Allred, Allred and Helferich5, Reference Allred, Allred, Ju, Clausen, Doerge, Schantz, Korol, Wallig and Helferich6.
Many studies have revealed the mechanism of the oestrogenic effects of genistein. Genistein binds to the ER and activates a number of oestrogen-responsive genes in vitro Reference Jorgensen, Vendelbo, Skakkebaek and Leffers7, Reference Miodini, Fioravanti, Di Fronzo and Cappelletti8, although its binding affinity is several-fold weaker than that of 17β-oestradiol (E2). Studies clearly demonstrate the presence of independent but interacting mitogenic pathways in the ER-positive breast cancer cells, including the ER pathway and the insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 receptor pathwayReference Kato, Masuhiro, Watamabe, Kobayashi, Takeyama, Endoh, Takeyama, Endoh and Yanagisawa9. Oestrogen-stimulated mitogenesis in the ER-positive human breast cancer cells could be mediated both by the ER signalling pathway and the enhancement of the IGF-1 signalling pathway. E2 can induce the expression of several members of the IGF family in human breast cancer cells, including IGF-1 receptor, IGF-2 receptor, IGF binding proteins, insulin receptor substrate 1 and insulin receptor substrate 2. The up regulation of these proteins by E2 provides the potential mechanisms for its autocrine and paracrine control of breast cancer cell mitogenesisReference Lee, Jackson, Gooch, Hilsenbeck, Coronado-Heinsohn, Osborne and Yee10, Reference Surmacz and Bartucci11. Our previous studies clearly indicated that, apart from the classical ER signalling pathway, the proliferative effects of genistein on the ER-positive human breast cancer MCF-7 cells are also related to the IGF-1 receptor signalling pathwayReference Chen and Wong12. Genistein mimics the action of E2 and causes the induction of IGF-1 receptor and insulin receptor substrate 1 expression in MCF-7 cells in a time-dependent manner. In the present study, our aim was to investigate the detailed mechanism by which genistein activates IGF-1 receptor transcription and expression in human breast cancer MCF-7 cells.
Materials and methods
Culture of human breast cancer cell line (MCF-7)
MCF-7 cells (ATCC no. HTB-22; ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) were routinely cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 5 % fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin (100 international units/ml) and streptomycin (100 μg/ml) (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 95 % air and 5 % CO2. Cells were transferred to phenol red-free DMEM supplemented with 1 % charcoal-stripped FBS, penicillin (100 units/ml) and streptomycin (100 μg/ml) by standard methods of trypsinisation, plated in six-well dishes for 5 d and allowed to replicate to 80 % confluence. Then cells were treated either with genistein (10− 6 m) or E2 (10− 8 m) (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) for 48 h. The medium and test compounds were replenished at 24 h. For anti-oestrogen, IGF-1 receptor antagonist JB-1 or cycloheximide (CHX) treatment, MCF-7 cells were exposed to genistein or E2 in the presence or absence of ICI 182,780 (10− 6 m; Tocris, Bristol, UK), JB-1 (1 μg/ml; Bachem, Bubendorf, Switzerland) or CHX (10− 6 m; Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) for 48 h.
Cell proliferation assays
For the growth study, MCF-7 cells were seeded in ninety-six-well plates (3 × 103 cells/well) in phenol red-free DMEM supplemented with 1 % charcoal-stripped FBS for 4 d and then treated with genistein (10− 6 m) or E2 (10− 8 m) with or without ICI 182,780 or JB-1 for 48 h. As an indirect measure of growth, the 3-[4, 5-dimethylthiazol 2-yl] 2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was used as described previouslyReference Denizot and Kang13. Briefly, the medium was removed and replaced with 100 μl tetrazolium (MTT, 5 mg/ml; Sigma) in PBS. The plates were incubated for 4 h at 37°C, followed by the addition of 100 μl of lysis buffer (0·04 m-HCl in propan-2-ol). The multi-well plates were shaken for 1 h and the signals were detected by a microplate reader using a wavelength of 595 nm.
Insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor promoter luciferase assay
The effect of genistein on IGF-1 receptor promoter activity was studied by transient transfection assays using a genomic DNA fragment extending from nucleotides − 2350 to +640 (nucleotide corresponds to the transcription site of rat IGF-1 receptor gene) or promoterless luciferase construct that was kindly provided by Dr Derek LeRoith (Diabetes Branch, Bethesda, MD, USA). MCF-7 cells were seeded in twelve-well plates for 1 d in DMEM medium supplemented with 5 % FBS. Cells were then transferred to phenol red-free DMEM supplemented with 1 % charcoal-stripped FBS for another 2 d. MCF-7 cells were transfected with 0·8 μg of reporter plasmid along with 0·4 μg of the control reporter plasmids pRL-TK using the Lipofectamine 2000 reagent according to the manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen). At 5 h after transfection, cells were treated with genistein or E2 in the presence or absence of 10− 6 m-ICI 182,780 for another 24 h and then harvested. Luciferase activity encoded by experimental and internal control plasmid was measured sequentially with the use of a TD-20/20 Luminometer (Turner Design, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and the Dual-Luciferase Reporter reagents according to the supplier's recommendation (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The IGF-1 receptor promoter activity was expressed as firefly luciferase values normalised by pRL-TK renilla luciferase values.
Semi-quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction for insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor expression
Total RNA was isolated from cells by using Trizol reagent according to the standard protocol. Total RNA (2 μg) was used to generate cDNA in each sample using SuperScript II RT with oligo(dT) 12-18 primers (Invitrogen). The evaluation of pS2 and IGF-1 receptor expression was performed by semi-quantitative RT-PCR as previously describedReference Chen and Wong12. PCR amplification was performed on a GeneAmp 9600 PCR system (Perkin Elmer, Foster City, CA, USA). Cycle-response curves for each PCR product had been determined to derive the optimal cycle for each gene candidate. The cycles that were chosen would ensure that the PCR product upon normalisation with the expression of housekeeping gene glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) between samples could be compared semi-quantitatively. For IGF-1 receptor and GAPDH, the primers used were 5′-ACTATGCCGGTGTCTGTGTG-3′ (IGF-1 receptor forward) and 5′-TGCAAGTTCTGGTTGTCGAG-3′ (IGF-1 receptor reverse), and 5′-ACCACAGTCCATGCCTACAC-3′ (GAPDH forward) and 5′-TTCACCACCCTGTTGCTGTA-3′ (GAPDH reverse) to yield products of 522 and 422 bp, with thirty and twenty PCR cycles, respectively. The PCR products were analysed using agarose gel electrophoresis. Optical densities of ethidium bromide-stained DNA bands were quantified using a luminal imager (Lumi-Imager; Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany).
Immunoblotting
For Western blotting, protein was isolated from cells using Trizol reagent according to the standard protocol. Protein concentrations were analysed by the method of Bradford (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA)Reference Bradford14. Equal amount of proteins (5 μg) were separated by SDS-PAGE on 10 % reducing gels at a constant voltage (150 V) for 1 h as previously describedReference Sriussadaporn, Wong, Pike and Favus15, and transblotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Immobilin-P; Millipore Corp., Beverly, MA, USA). Immunodetection was performed after blocking non-specific binding sites on the membrane with 5 % skimmed milk. The blots were probed with polyclonal rabbit anti-human IGF-1 receptor β (1:2000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA) as the primary antibody, followed by incubation with the goat anti-rabbit antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (1:2000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) as the secondary antibody for 1 h. The antigen–antibody complexes were then detected with enhanced chemiluminescence reagentReference Mattson and Bellehumeur16 and visualised by the Lumi-Imager using Lumi Analyst version 3.10 software (Roche Molecular Biochemicals).
Statistical analysis
Data are reported as mean values with their standard errors. Significance of differences between group means was determined by one-way ANOVA.
Results
Role of insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor in mediating the proliferative effects of genistein in human breast cancer (MCF-7) cells
Genistein and E2 have proliferative effects on human breast cancer (MCF-7) cells. Their proliferative effects could be completely abolished by co-incubation of MCF-7 cells with IGF-1 receptor antagonist JB-1 (Fig. 1). As JB-1 is a selective competitive antagonist of IGF-1 receptor autophosphorylation, the inhibition of the action of E2 and genistein by JB-1 suggests that IGF-1 receptor plays a pivotal role in mediating the proliferative effects of both E2 and genistein in human breast cancer (MCF-7) cells.
Effect of genistein on insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor promoter activity
Our previous study clearly shows that IGF-1 receptor expression is increased upon treatment with a physiological concentration of genistein in a time-dependent mannerReference Chen and Wong12. To determine if the increase in IGF-1 receptor expression by genistein was mediated by the up regulation of IGF-1 receptor promoter activities, a transient transfection assay was performed. MCF-7 cells were transiently transfected with IGF-1 receptor luciferase promoter p(2350/+640)Luc or promoterless luciferase construct for 5 h, followed by treatment with genistein (10− 6 m) or E2 (10− 8 m) for another 24 h. As shown in Fig. 2, genistein and E2 significantly increased the IGF-1 receptor promoter luciferase activity and their induction could be abolished by co-treatment with the anti-oestrogen ICI 182,780. There was no luciferase activity detected in the cells that were transfected with promoterless luciferase construct (data not shown). These results suggest that genistein and E2 could directly up regulate IGF-1 receptor gene expression by their stimulatory actions on IGF-1 receptor promoter activities, and it appears that these effects are also ER-dependent.
Effect of JB-1 on insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor gene expression induced by genistein
To determine if functional IGF-1 receptor was required for genistein up regulation of IGF-1 receptor gene expression, MCF-7 cells treated with either genistein or E2 were co-incubated with or without the IGF-1 receptor antagonist JB-1. The up regulation of IGF-1 receptor gene expression induced by genistein was completely abolished by JB-1 (Fig. 3), indicating that the stimulatory effect of genistein on IGF-1 receptor expression not only required the ER-dependent pathway but also involved the activity of functional IGF-1 receptor. The action of genistein on IGF-1 receptor was similar to those of E2, as JB-1 could also abolish the up regulation of IGF-1 receptor gene expression induced by E2 (Fig. 4).
Up regulation of insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor expression by genistein requires oestrogen receptor and de novo protein synthesis
Our previous results clearly show that genistein and E2 could increase the gene and protein expression of IGF-1 receptor and these effects could be completely blocked by the anti-oestrogen ICI 182,780Reference Chen and Wong12. To further investigate the potential mechanism involved in the up regulation of IGF-1 receptor expression by genistein, MCF-7 cells treated with either genistein or E2 were co-incubated with or without CHX (5 μg/ml), a de novo protein synthesis inhibitor. The expression of IGF-1 receptor induced by E2 was completely blocked by CHX at both protein and mRNA level (Figs. 4 (A) and (B)), indicating that de novo protein synthesis is required for the action of E2. Similar to the action of E2, the up regulation of IGF-1 receptor protein and mRNA by genistein could be blocked by CHX treatment (Figs. 4 (A) and (B)) and thus requires de novo protein synthesis.
Discussion
Genistein, a planar molecule with an aromatic A ring, has a chemical structure similar to that of steroidal oestrogens, and its ability to behave as an oestrogen in various tissues has been widely described. Our previous studies have shown that genistein has biphasic effects on the growth of the ER-positive human breast cancer (MCF-7) cells, in which high concentration (> 10− 5 m) inhibitsReference Chen, Huang, Tzang, Yang and Wong17 while low concentration (10− 6 m) stimulates breast cancer cell proliferationReference Chen and Wong12. Our previous study clearly demonstrates that genistein has oestrogen-like activities and exerts its action via the activation of the IGF-1 receptor signalling pathway in human breast cancer MCF-7 cellsReference Chen and Wong12. In the present study, we provide further evidence that the IGF-1 receptor antagonist JB-1 can completely block the stimulatory effect of genistein on MCF-7 cells. Genistein can activate the transcription of IGF-1 receptor via ER. The stimulation of IGF-1 receptor expression by genistein appears to be related to the cross-talk of the ER pathway and the IGF-1 receptor pathway as well as de novo protein synthesis.
The IGF-1 receptor is a receptor–tyrosine kinase that plays a critical role in signalling, cell survival and proliferation. The IGF-1 receptor is necessary for normal breast biology, but recent clinical and experimental data strongly suggest that the same receptors are involved in the development of breast cancerReference Surmacz18. The IGF-1 receptor is over-expressed in the ER-positive breast cancer cells compared with its levels in normal epithelial cells. Studies clearly demonstrate the presence of independent but interacting mitogenic pathways in the ER-positive breast cancer cells, including the ER pathway and the IGF-1 receptor pathwayReference Kato, Masuhiro, Watamabe, Kobayashi, Takeyama, Endoh, Takeyama, Endoh and Yanagisawa9. In the present study, we used JB-1, a peptide analogue of IGF-1 that is involved in binding to the IGF-1 receptor. It is a potent, highly selective, competitive antagonist of IGF-1 receptor autophosphorylation and cellular proliferation. The present results clearly demonstrate the proliferative actions and the stimulatory effects on IGF-1 receptor induced by genistein and oestrogen could be completely blocked by co-treatment with JB-1. These findings suggest that IGF-1 receptor activation is necessary for the stimulatory effects of genistein and oestrogen in human breast cancer cells.
The IGF-1 and ER systems are engaged in a powerful functional cross-talk in human tissues. E2 and IGF-1 act together to stimulate proliferation in normal mammary epithelium and increase the risk of breast cancerReference Martin and Stoica19. IGF-1 may activate ER in the absence of estrogens in different cell typesReference Surmacz and Bartucci11, Reference Agrati, Garnier, Patrone, Pollio, Santagati, Vegeto and Maggi20. IGF-1 can modulate oestrogen action by acting via the tyrosine kinase of the IGF-1 receptor. Ligands for IGF-1 receptor can regulate ER gene expression and ER-mediated transcription in an oestrogen-independent mannerReference Lee, Weng, Jackson and Yee21. In turn, oestrogen can activate the IGF-1 receptor signalling pathway at different levels. At the cell surface, oestrogen induces ER and IGF-1 receptor association, probably through an adapter protein and increases IGF-1 receptor phosphorylationReference Mendez, Azcoitia and Garcia-Segura22. Accumulating evidence indicates that the oestrogen-responsive region in the IGF-1 receptor promoter was mapped to a guanine-cytosine (GC)-rich sequence located between nucleotides − 40 and − 188 in the 5′ flanking region. A recent study reported that the effect of E2 on IGF-1 receptor expression was at least partly mediated through the activation of the Sp1 transcription factor in breast cancer cellsReference Maor, Mayer, Yarden, Lee, Sarfstein, Werner and Papa23.
Genistein can mimic oestrogen to stimulate ER-positive cell proliferation. Our previous study clearly showed that genistein mimicked E2 in stimulating the IGF-1 receptor signalling pathway and the effect was ER-dependent. The present study clearly further demonstrates the involvement of the cross-talk between ER and the IGF-1 receptor-dependent signalling pathway in mediating the actions of genistein in MCF-7 cells. Genistein not only increases the protein and mRNA expression of the IGF-1 receptor but also increases IGF-1 receptor promoter activity. These effects could be completely abolished by co-treatment of MCF-7 cells with ICI 180,782. These results clearly suggest that an increase in IGF-1 receptor transcription at least in part accounts for the induction of IGF-1 receptor expression by genistein and the effect is ER-dependent.
The present study also further determines the potential mechanism involved in the up regulation of IGF-1 receptor expression by genistein. CHX, a de novo protein synthesis inhibitor, can completely abolish the up regulation of IGF-1 receptor expression at both protein and mRNA level. In the case of protein expression, it is clearly shown that blocking new protein synthesis can prevent the translation of IGF-1 receptor mRNA into protein. As for the case of IGF-1 receptor mRNA expression, these results suggest that some labile proteins (with short half-lives in vivo) could be essential for the genistein activation of IGF-1 receptor transcription. Inhibition of new protein synthesis will prevent these labile proteins from being synthesised. Examples of these proteins could be proteins involved in the transcription machinery (coactivator and co-repressor).
In summary, the present data provide the first evidence that genistein activates the transcription of IGF-1 receptor gene expression. The stimulation of IGF-1 receptor expression by genistein appears to require the association of ER and IGF-1 receptor as well as de novo protein synthesis. Most importantly, the present study provides the mechanistic basis to understand how genistein mimics oestrogen by activating ER–IGF-1 receptor cross-talk to stimulate human breast cancer cell growth. Thus, pre- and post-menopausal women who are at risk of developing ER-positive breast cancer should be cautioned when considering using genistein as an alternative approach to manage menopause-related syndromes.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr Derek LeRoith for the IGF-1 receptor promoter construct. The present study was supported by the Areas of Excellence Scheme established under the University Grants Committee of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (AOE/P-10/01), the Central Research Fund from The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (GU-135) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30570573).