Hostname: page-component-669899f699-chc8l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-26T05:17:10.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anthropometric proxies for child neurodevelopment in low-resource settings: length- or height-for-age, head circumference or both?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2022

Molly M. Lamb Open the ORCID record for Molly M. Lamb [Opens in a new window] ,
Amy K. Connery Open the ORCID record for Amy K. Connery [Opens in a new window] ,
Alison M. Colbert ,
Desirée Bauer ,
Daniel Olson ,
Alejandra Paniagua-Avila ,
Diva M. Calvimontes ,
Guillermo Antonio Bolaños ,
Hana M. El Sahly  and
Flor M. Muñoz
...Show all authors
Molly M. Lamb*
Affiliation:
Center for Global Health and Department of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, USA
Amy K. Connery
Affiliation:
Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
Alison M. Colbert
Affiliation:
Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
Desirée Bauer
Affiliation:
Center for Human Development, Fundación Para LA Salud Integral DE los Guatemaltecos, Retalhuleu, Guatemala
Daniel Olson
Affiliation:
Center for Global Health and Department of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, USA Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
Alejandra Paniagua-Avila
Affiliation:
Center for Human Development, Fundación Para LA Salud Integral DE los Guatemaltecos, Retalhuleu, Guatemala Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
Diva M. Calvimontes
Affiliation:
Center for Human Development, Fundación Para LA Salud Integral DE los Guatemaltecos, Retalhuleu, Guatemala
Guillermo Antonio Bolaños
Affiliation:
Center for Human Development, Fundación Para LA Salud Integral DE los Guatemaltecos, Retalhuleu, Guatemala
Hana M. El Sahly
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
Flor M. Muñoz
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
Edwin J. Asturias
Affiliation:
Center for Global Health and Department of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, USA Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
*
Address for correspondence: Molly M. Lamb, Center for Global Health and Department of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, USA. Email: molly.lamb@cuanschutz.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Stunting (<−2 SD of length- or height-for-age on WHO growth curves) is the most used predictor of child neurodevelopmental (ND) risk. Occipitofrontal head circumference (OFC) may be an equally feasible, but more direct and robust predictor. We explored association of the two measurements with ND outcome, separately and combined, and examined if cutoffs are more efficacious than continuous measures in predicting ND risk. Infants and young children in rural Guatemala (n = 642; age range = 0.1–35.9 months) were enrolled in a prospective natural history study, and their ND was tested using the Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL) longitudinally. Length- or height-for-age and OFC-for-age were calculated. We performed age-adjusted multivariable regression analyses to explore the association between 1) length or height and ND, 2) OFC and ND, and 3) both length or height and OFC combined, with ND; concurrently, predictively, and longitudinally, as continuous variables and using WHO z-score cutoffs. Continuous length- or height-for-age and OFC z-scores were more strongly associated with MSEL than the traditional -2 SD WHO cutoff. The combination of height-for-age z-score and OFC z-score was consistently, strongly associated with the MSEL Early Learning Composite concurrently (p-values 0.0004–0.11), predictively (p-value 0.001–0.07), with the exception of the 18–24 months age group which had very few records, and in the longitudinal model (p-value <0.0001–0.004). The combination of continuous length- or height-for-age and OFC shows additional utility in estimating ND risk in infants and young children. Measurement of OFC may improve precision of prediction of ND risk in infants and young children.

Keywords

Head circumferencestuntingneurodevelopmentyoung childrenlow-resource settings
Type
Original Article
Information
Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , February 2023 , pp. 61 - 69
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with International Society for Developmental Origins of Health and Disease

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

Molly M. Lamb and Amy K. Connery are co-first authors.

**

Flor M. Muñoz and Edwin J. Asturias are co-senior authors.

References

Van Zyl, C, Badenhorst, M, Hanekom, S, Heine, M. Unravelling € low-resource settings’: a systematic scoping review with qualitative content analysis. BMJ Glob Heal. 2021; 6(6), e005190. DOI 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernald, LCH, Prado, E, Kariger, P, Raikes, A. A toolkit for measuring early childhood development in low and middle-income countries 2017, https://ideas.repec.org/b/wbk/wbpubs/29000.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villagomez, AN, Muñoz, FM, Peterson, RL, et al. Neurodevelopmental delay: case definition & guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data. Vaccine. 2019; 37(52), 7623–7641. DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.05.027.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. WHO child growth standards: length/height-for-age, weight-for-age, weight-for-length, weight-forheight and body mass index-for-age. Methods and Development. 2006. DOI 10.4067/S0370-41062009000400012.Google Scholar
Prado, EL, Abbeddou, S, Adu-Afarwuah, S, et al. Linear growth and child development in Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Malawi. Pediatrics. 2016; 138(2), 353. DOI 10.1542/peds.2015-4698.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Black, RE, Allen, LH, Bhutta, ZA, et al. Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequences. Lancet. 2008; 371(9608), 243–260. DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61690-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
UNICEF. The state of the world’s children 2016: a fair chance for every child. Publ Home Page. 2016. ISBN: 978-92-806-4838-6 Google Scholar
Sudfeld, CR, Charles McCoy, D, Danaei, G, et al. Linear growth and child development in low- and middle-income countries: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2015; 135(5), e1266–e1275. DOI 10.1542/peds.2014-3111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meeks Gardner, JM, Grantham-McGregor, SM, Himes, J, Chang, S. Behaviour and development of stunted and nonstunted Jamaican children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry Allied Discip. 1999; 40(5), 819–827. DOI 10.1017/S0021963099004035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perumal, N, Bassani, DG, Roth, DE. Use and misuse of stunting as a measure of child health. J Nutr. 2018; 148(3), 311–315. DOI 10.1093/jn/nxx064.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prado, EL, Larson, LM, Cox, K, Bettencourt, K, Kubes, JN, Shankar, AH. Do effects of early life interventions on linear growth correspond to effects on neurobehavioural development? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Heal. 2019; 7(10), e1398–e1413. DOI 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30361-4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leroy, JL, Frongillo, EA. Perspective: what does stunting really mean? A critical review of the evidence. Adv Nutr. 2019; 10(2), 196–204. DOI 10.1093/advances/nmy101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization. WHO Child Growth Standards: Head Circumference-for-Age, Arm Circumference-for-Age, Triceps Skinfold-for-Age and Subscapular Skinfold-for-Age: Methods and Development, 2007.Google Scholar
Connery, A, Colbert, A, Lamb, M. Head circumference may be the best proxy for neurodevelopmental risk in children in low-resource settings. Arch Dis Child. 2022. DOI 10.1136/archdischild-2021-323216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gale, CR, O’Callaghan, FJ, Bredow, M, Martyn, CN. The influence of head growth in fetal life, infancy, and childhood on intelligence at the ages of 4 and 8 years. Pediatrics. 2006; 118(4), 1486–1492. DOI 10.1542/peds.2005-2629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ivanovic, DM, Leiva, BP, Pérez, HT, et al. Head size and intelligence, learning, nutritional status and brain development: head, IQ, learning, nutrition and brain. Neuropsychologia. 2004; 42(8), 1118–1131. DOI 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.11.022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reiss, AL, Abrams, MT, Singer, HS, Ross, JL, Denckla, MB. Brain development, gender and IQ in children. A volumetric imaging study. Brain. 1996; 119(5), 1763–1774. DOI 10.1093/brain/119.5.1763.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Von der Hagen, M, Pivarcsi, M, Liebe, J, et al. Diagnostic approach to microcephaly in childhood: a two-center study and review of the literature. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014; 56(8), 732–741. DOI 10.1111/dmcn.12425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olson, D, Lamb, MM, Lopez, MR, et al. A rapid epidemiological tool to measure the burden of norovirus infection and disease in resource-limited settings. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017; 4(2), e0142927. DOI 10.1093/ofid/ofx049.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asturias, EJ, Heinrichs, G, Domek, G, et al. The center for human development in guatemala: an innovative model for global population health. Adv Pediatr. 2016; 63(1), 357–387. DOI 10.1016/j.yapd.2016.04.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colbert, AM, Lamb, MM, Asturias, EJ, et al. Reliability and validity of an adapted and translated version of the Mullen scales of early learning (AT-MSEL) in rural guatemala. Child Care Health Dev. 2020; 46(3), 327–335. DOI 10.1111/cch.12748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Connery, AK, Colbert, AM, Lamb, MM, et al. Receptive language skills among young children in rural Guatemala: the relationship between the test de Vocabulario en imagenes peabody and a translated and adapted version of the Mullen scales of early learning. Child Care Health Dev. 2019; 45, 702–708. cch.12702. DOI 10.1111/cch.12702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connery, A, Berrios-Siervo, G, Arroyave, P, et al. Responding to the Zika epidemic: preparation of a neurodevelopmental testing protocol to evaluate young children in rural Guatemala. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019; 100(2), 438–444. DOI 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullen, EM. Mullen Scales of Early Learning, 1995. Pearson, Bloomington, MN.Google Scholar
https://www.who.int/childgrowth/software/readme_sas.pdf.Google Scholar
Connery, AK, Lamb, MM, Colbert, AM, et al. A prospective cohort study of head circumference and its association with neurodevelopmental outcomes in infants and young children in rural Guatemala. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2022; 95, 1–8.Google Scholar
Scharf, RJ, Rogawski, ET, Murray-Kolb, LE, et al. Early childhood growth and cognitive outcomes: findings from the MAL-ED study. Matern Child Nutr. 2018; 14(3), 828. DOI 10.1111/mcn.12584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sindhu, KN, Ramamurthy, P, Ramanujam, K, et al. Low head circumference during early childhood and its predictors in a semi-urban settlement of Vellore, Southern India. BMC Pediatr. 2019; 19(1), 142. DOI 10.1186/s12887-019-1553-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prado, EL, Dewey, KG. Nutrition and brain development in early life. Nutr Rev. 2014; 72(4), 267–284. DOI 10.1111/nure.12102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoch, MB, Smythe, PM. 15-year developmental study on effects of severe undernutrition during infancy on subsequent physical growth and intellectual functioning. Arch Dis Child. 1976; 51(5), 327–336. DOI 10.1136/adc.51.5.327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devakumar, D, Bamford, A, Ferreira, MU, et al. Infectious causes of microcephaly: epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018; 18(1), e1–e13. DOI 10.1016/s1473-3099(17)30398-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeSilva, M, Munoz, FM, Sell, E, et al. Congenital microcephaly: case definition & guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of safety data after maternal immunisation. Vaccine. 2017; 35(48), 6472–6482. DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.01.044.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grantham-McGregor, SM, Fernald, LC, Sethuraman, K. Effects of health and nutrition on cognitive and behavioural development in children in the first three years of life: Part 1: Low birthweight, breastfeeding, and proteinenergy malnutrition. Food Nutr Bull. 1999; 20(1), 53–75. DOI 10.1177/156482659902000107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanovic, DM, Leiva, BP, Pérez, HT, et al. Nutritional status, brain development and scholastic achievement of Chilean high-school graduates from high and low intellectual quotient and socio-economic status. Br J Nutr. 2002; 87(1), 81–92. DOI 10.1079/bjn2001485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaidya, A, Saville, N, Shrestha, BP, et al. Effects of antenatal multiple micronutrient supplementation on children’s weight and size at 2 years of age in Nepal: follow-up of a double-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008; 371(9611), 492–499. DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60172-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Surkan, PJ, Shankar, M, Katz, J, et al. Beneficial effects of zinc supplementation on head circumference of Nepalese infants and toddlers: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2012; 66(7), 836–842. DOI 10.1038/ejcn.2012.42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grembi, JA, Lin, A, Karim, MA, et al. Effect of water, sanitation, handwashing, and nutrition interventions on enteropathogens in children 14 months old: a cluster-randomized controlled trial in rural Bangladesh. J Infect Dis. 2020; 18, 1211. DOI 10.1093/infdis/jiaa549.Google Scholar
Waterlow, JC. Classification and definition of protein-calorie malnutrition. Br Med J. 1972; 3(5826), 566–569. DOI 10.1136/bmj.3.5826.566.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colombo, M, de la Parra, A, López, I. Intellectual and physical outcome of children undernourished in early life is influenced by later environmental conditions. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1992; 34(7),611–622. DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1992.tb11492.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shen, S, Xiao, W, Zhang, L, et al. Prevalence and clinical profiles of disproportionate and proportionate microcephaly in China: a population-based cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2018; 392, S51. DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32680-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opitz, JM, Holt, MC. Microcephaly: general considerations and aids to nosology. J Cran Genet Dev Bio. 1990; 10(2), 175–204.Google ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization. Countdown to 2015 decade report (2000-2010) with country profiles: taking stock of maternal, newborn and child survival. In Maternal Newborn Child Survival Countdown to 2015, 2015.Google Scholar
Gatica-Domínguez, G, Victora, C, Barros, AJD. Ethnic inequalities and trends in stunting prevalence among Guatemalan children: an analysis using national health surveys 1995-2014. Int J Equity Health. 2019; 18(1), 110. DOI 10.1186/s12939-019-1016-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rick, AM, Domek, G, Cunningham, M, et al. High background congenital microcephaly in rural Guatemala: implications for neonatal congenital Zika virus infection screening. Glob Heal Sci Pract. 2017; 5(4), 686–696. DOI 10.9745/GHSP-D-17-00116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, LC, Joshi, N, Lohani, M, et al. Head growth of undernourished children in rural Nepal: association with demographics, health and diet. Paediatr Int Child Health. 2016; 36(2), 91–101. DOI 10.1080/20469047.2015.1133517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed