Hostname: page-component-669899f699-qzcqf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T10:24:03.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Christ's being and Summa Theologiae 3a Q17 art. 2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Dominic Ryan OP Open the ORCID record for Dominic Ryan OP [Opens in a new window]
Dominic Ryan OP*
Affiliation:
Blackfriars Hall, University of Oxford
*
dominic.ryan@bfriars.ox.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article argues that Summa Theologiae 3a Q17 art. 2 is consistent with the attribution of a proper being to Christ's human nature. It proceeds in three stages. First, it examines the emergence of the problem of Christ's being through an analysis of the Chalcedonian Decree. In so doing it argues that the decree commits its adherents to accepting that Christ's human nature was an individual nature and it shows how Aquinas used his account of natures and essences to interpret this. Second, it considers five objections to the view which denies a proper being to Christ's human nature. Third, it argues that Christ's individual human nature can possess a proper being because (i) esse does not render an individual nature a person and (ii) the character and function of the divine esse entails that it could not receive any new esse from the individual human nature Christ possesses.

Keywords

ChalcedonChristEsseEssenceHypostatic Union
Type
Original Articles
Information
New Blackfriars , Volume 104 , Issue 1109 , January 2023 , pp. 57 - 78
Copyright
Copyright © 2022 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Select Bibliography

Aquinas, Thomas, Summa theologiae, 9 vols. (Romae: Ex Typographia Polyglotta S. C. de Propaganda Fide, 1888–1906).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas, Sancti Thomae de Aquino Expositio super librum Boethii De Trinitate, ed. Decker, Bruno (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1955).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas, Summa contra gentiles, eds. Marc, Petrus and Pera, Ceslas, 3 vols. (Taurini: Marietti, 1961).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas, In duodecim libros Metaphysicorum Aristotelis expositio, eds. Cathala, M.R. and Spiazzi, R.M. (Taurini: Marietti, 1964).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas, ‘Questiones Disputatae De Potentia Dei’, in Spiazzi, Raimondo (ed.), Quaestiones Disputatae, Editio 10. edn. (Taurini & Romae: Marietti, 1964).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas, In octo libros Physicorum Aristotelis expositio, ed. Maggiòlo, P. M. (Taurini: Marietti, 1965).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas, De ente et essentia, Sancti Thomae de Aquino opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII edita (Rome: Editori di san Tommaso, 1976).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas, “Quaestio disputata De unione Verbi incarnati”, eds. Obenauer, Klaus, Senner, Walter, and Bartocci, Barbara (Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog, 2011).Google Scholar
Billot, Louis, De Verbo Incarnato (Romae: Apud Aedes Universitatis Gregorianae, 1927).Google Scholar
Bobik, Joseph, ‘Dimensions in the Individuation of Bodily Substances’, Philosophical Studies (Maynooth), 4 (1954), 60–79.Google Scholar
Cajetan, Tommaso de Vio, Commentaria in Summam Theologiae S. Thomae Aquinatis, 9 vols. (Rome: Leonine Commission, 1888–1906).Google Scholar
Capreolus, Jean, Defensiones theologiæ Divi Thomæ Aquinatis, eds. Paban, Ceslaus and Pègues, Thomas, 7 vols. (Turonibus: Sumptibus Alfred Cattier, 1900).Google Scholar
Dewan, Lawrence, Thomas, ‘St., Capreolus and Entitative Composition’, Divus Thomas (Piacenza), 80 (1977), 355–375.Google Scholar
Freddoso, Alfred J., ‘Human Nature, Potency and the Incarnation’, Faith and Philosophy, 3 (1) (1986), 27–53.Google Scholar
Garrigou-Lagrange, Réginald, ‘De Personalitate Iuxta Caietanum’, Angelicum, 11 (1934), 407–422.Google Scholar
Garrigou-Lagrange, Réginald, Christ the Saviour: A Commentary on the Third Part of St.Thomas' Theological Summa, trans. Dom Bede Rose (St Louis, Mo: Herder, 1950).Google Scholar
Gorman, Michael, Aquinas on the Metaphysics of the Hypostatic Union (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Muñiz, Francisco Pérez, ‘El constitutivo formal de la persona creada en la tradicion tomista’, Ciencia Tomista, 68 (212-213) (1945), 5–89.Google Scholar
Nicolas, Jean-Hervé, Synthèse dogmatique: de la Trinité à la Trinité (Paris: Éditions Beauchesne, 2011).Google Scholar
Owens, Joseph, An Elementary Christian Metaphysics (Houston, TX: Center for Thomistic Studies, 1985).Google Scholar
Reichmann, James B., ‘Aquinas, Scotus, and the Christological Mystery: Why Christ is not a Human Person’, The Thomist, 71 (3) (2007), 451–474.Google Scholar
Sallas, Victor Jr, ‘Thomas Aquinas on Christ's Esse: A Metaphysics of the Incarnation’, The Thomist, 70 (4) (2006), 577–603.Google Scholar
Tanner, Norman P., Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils, 2 vols. (London: Sheed & Ward, 1990).Google Scholar
Torrell, Jean-Pierre, Saint Thomas Aquinas: Vol. I The Person and his Work, trans. Royal, Robert, rev. edn. (Washington, D.C: The Catholic University of America Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Wippel, John F., The Metaphysical Thought of Thomas Aquinas: From Finite Being to Uncreated Being (Washington, D.C: The Catholic University of America Press, 2000).Google Scholar