Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:20:32.044Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Benthic diatom flora in supraglacial habitats: a generic-level comparison

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2017

M.L. Yallop
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, UK, E-mail: Marian.Yallop@bristol.ac.uk
A.M. Anesio
Affiliation:
School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, University Road, Bristol BS8 1SS, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Meltwaters on the surface of glaciers have been identified as hot spots for microbial activity. Records indicate that cyanobacteria and green algae dominate the autotrophic assemblages found in the benthic debris in cryoconite holes. Diatoms are commonly recorded in lentic and lotic ecosystems within polar habitats and, in line with the ubiquity principle for microbial communities, potentially, diatoms should be frequently found in the cryoconite of supraglacial environments. In this study, we cultured debris from cryoconite material collected in Svalbard and Greenland, to promote the growth of diatoms. Diatom generic richness varied between 12 and 17 between sites and was ∼5-fold higher than previously reported. Cryoconite supported aerophytic, halophytic, epipelic and bryophilic diatoms, suggesting multiple origins of colonizing cells. Twenty-seven genera were cultured from material that had been frozen (–20°C) for >1 year, indicating their long-term cryotolerance. The diatom flora composition was similar to that recorded in relatively acidic arctic lakes of low conductivity, and bore similarities at the generic level to those from terrestrial/semi-terrestrial moss communities from both the Arctic and Antarctic. As glaciers retreat, the diatom cells residing in cryoconite have the potential to act as seeding agents for a variety of terrestrial and aquatic habitats in proglacial regions and beyond.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © the Author(s) [year] 2010

Introduction

In The 1930s, Cryoconite Holes Were Identified As Sites Of Biological Activity (Reference SteinböckSteinböck, 1936), and They Are Now Recognized As Important ‘Hot Spots’ For Biogeochemical Cycling On The Surface Of Glaciers Worldwide (Reference Sawstrom, Mumford, Marshall, Hodson and Laybourn-ParrySäwström and others, 2002; Reference Anesio, Hodson, Fritz, Psenner and SattlerAnesio and others, 2009). They Support A Range Of Organisms Including Heterotrophic and Phototrophic Bacteria, Cyanobacteria, Algae, Heterotrophic Protists, Nematodes, Rotifers and Tardigrades (Reference De Smet and van RompuDe Smet and Van Rompu, 1994; Reference Mueller, Vincent, Pollard, Fritsen, Elster, Seckbach, Vincent and LhotskyMueller and others, 2001; Reference Christner, Kvito and ReeveChristner and others, 2003; Reference Porazinska, Fountain, Nylen, Tranter, Virginia and WallPorazinska and others, 2004). Microbial Propagules Are Transported To Glacial Surfaces By Various Agents Including Wind, Biovectors and Water. Local Water Bodies and Soils Are Often Considered To Act As A Major Source Of Colonizing Material (Reference Wharton, McKay, Simmons and ParkerWharton and others, 1985; Reference Kaštovská, Elster, Stibal and ŠantruckováKaštovská and others 2005; Reference Stibal, Sabacka and KaštovskáStibal and others, 2006). Microbes Dominate The Relatively Simple Truncated Food Webs Of Cryoconite Ecosystems and Share Similarities With Those Communities Found In Polar Lakes (Reference Laybourn-ParryLaybourn-Parry, 2009).

Compared to studies on polar lakes and streams, detailed investigations of the microbial communities from cryoconite holes are relatively limited (e.g. Reference Mueller, Vincent, Pollard, Fritsen, Elster, Seckbach, Vincent and LhotskyMueller and others, 2001; Reference Sawstrom, Mumford, Marshall, Hodson and Laybourn-ParrySäwström and others, 2002; Reference Christner, Kvito and ReeveChristner and others, 2003; Reference Stibal, Sabacka and KaštovskáStibal and others, 2006). Species of cyanobacteria and, occasionally, chlorophytes are the most commonly recorded primary producers in these habitats (Reference Vincent, Whitton and PottsVincent, 2000; Reference Mueller, Vincent, Pollard, Fritsen, Elster, Seckbach, Vincent and LhotskyMueller and others, 2001; Reference Stibal, Sabacka and KaštovskáStibal and others, 2006). The dominance of cyanobacteria in cryoconite holes is explained by their high tolerance to adverse environmental conditions including low nutrient levels, high irradiance, ultraviolet radiation and low temperatures (Reference Mueller, Vincent, Pollard, Fritsen, Elster, Seckbach, Vincent and LhotskyMueller and others, 2001). Bipolar differences have been identified in the cyanobacterial and green algal communities of cryoconite holes, which could be related to differences in their abiotic regimes (Reference Mueller, Vincent, Pollard, Fritsen, Elster, Seckbach, Vincent and LhotskyMueller and others, 2001). Diatoms are seldom reported in cryoconite material, despite their prevalence in polar lakes and streams where they might experience a similar suite of environmental pressures (Reference JonesJones, 1996; Reference Spaulding, McKnight, Stoermer and SmolSpaulding and McKnight, 1999; Reference Mueller, Vincent, Pollard, Fritsen, Elster, Seckbach, Vincent and LhotskyMueller and others, 2001; Reference Mueller and PollardMueller and Pollard, 2004; Reference SabbeSabbe and others, 2004; Reference Antoniades, Douglas and SmolAntoniades and others, 2005).

It is commonly thought that freshwater diatom species are widespread, and are capable of growth in a wide variety of environmental conditions. In the microbial world, the much quoted phrases that ‘everything is everywhere’ and ‘the environment selects’, put forward by Reference Baas-Becking, Van Stockum and ZoonBaas-Becking (1934), have been reviewed more recently, in the context of diatoms, by a number of researchers. Reference Finlay, Monaghan and MaberlyFinlay and others (2002) proposed, for instance, that the rate of scale of dispersal of freshwater diatom species is a function of their global abundance. They predict that rare species will be found with additional sampling effort. Therefore, they oppose the view that many diatom species are endemic (Reference Mann and DroopMann and Droop, 1996; Reference Kociolek and SpauldingKociolek and Spaulding, 2001; Reference Van de Vijver, Gremmen and BeyensVan de Vijver and others, 2005; Reference Vanormelingen, Verleyen and VyvermanVanormelingen and others, 2008; Reference VyvermanVyverman and others, 2010), because it is impossible to prove that they do not occur elsewhere. In this paper, we hypothesize that given their proximity to sources of local propagules, diatoms should be able to settle in cryoconite holes and their composition should reflect that of other local habitats. We hypothesize that the paucity of records of diatom species inhabiting cryoconite holes relates to under-sampling. As cyanobacteria or chlorophytes are numerically dominant, diatom frustules may be harder to find in the debris. Given the strong environmental signal provided by diatoms, differences in their assemblages between cryoconite holes may indicate differences in the hydrology and physico-chemical regimes, pertaining to their catchments. A number of investigations have been undertaken on the diatom species assemblages and environmental drivers in both lentic and lotic water bodies and terrestrial habitats in polar regions over the past few years (e.g. Reference Elster and KomarekElster and Komarek, 2003; Reference Sabbe, Verleyen, Hodgson, Vanhoutte and VyvermanSabbe and others, 2003; Reference Bouchard, Gajewski and HamiltonBouchard and others, 2004; Reference Jones and BirksJones and Birks, 2004; Reference Vinocur and MaidanaVinocur and Maidana, 2010; Reference VyvermanVyverman and others, 2010). A number of these studies highlight the problems associated with obtaining comparable taxonomic records due to nomenclatural difficulties and the presence of cryptic and semicryptic diatom species (Reference Mann, Evans, Brodie and LewisMann and Evans, 2007). An alternative approach taken to overcome such difficulties is to analyse assemblages at the level of genus (Reference VerleyenVerleyen and others, 2009; Reference VyvermanVyverman and others, 2010). Recent revisions in the diatom flora have led to splitting of larger genera into a small number of new genera which may provide improved resolution at this level. Here we adopt a generic-level approach to examine the diatom flora in cryoconite from supraglacial habitats in Svalbard and Greenland and draw upon historical diatom records from selected polar habitats to examine spatial relationships.

Sampling Sites

Cryoconite holes were sampled in two glaciers in the Kongsfjord region of northwest Spitsbergen (78°53'N, 12°04'E), Austre Brøggerbreen and Vestre Brøggerbreen, and two glaciers in Greenland, Frøya Glacier (748240 N, 20°50'W) and the terminus of a small cirque glacier near Zackenberg station (74°30'N, 20°46'W). Cryoconite material was placed in sterile Whirl-Pak bags (Nasco, Fort Atkinson, WI, USA) and frozen at –20°C. Prior to analysis, samples of frozen cryoconite from Greenland and Svalbard were removed and gently thawed. All samples were processed using aseptic techniques. Subsamples of untreated material were strewn on microscope slides and examined for diatom cells using light microscopy (Leica DM LB2) at 1000× magnification. The large volume of inorganic debris relative to diatom frustules made direct observations unfeasible. Subsequently, cultures were set up to promote the growth of viable propagules within the debris. Three types of media were prepared to promote the growth of algae and cyanobacteria: Bold’s Basal media (Reference Nichols and SteinNichols, 1973), Diatom media (Reference Beakes, Canter and JaworskiBeakes and others, 1988) and BG-11 (Reference Stanier, Kunisawa, Mandel and Cohen-BazireStanier and others, 1971). Slurries of debris in 10μL aliquots were introduced to sterile 40 mL Nunc polystyrene tissue culture flasks (Cole-Palmer, UK) containing 25 mL of selected media. Samples were incubated at 4.0±0.2°C, with light intensity of 20–60 μmol m−2 s−1 for a period of 12 weeks. Incubating samples in different media allowed for any potential symbiotic or mutualistic relationships to be supported within the developing microbial community.

Samples were harvested and digested to remove organic material using a saturated potassium permanganate solution and concentrated HCl (Reference KellyKelly and others, 2007). Subsamples of cleaned material were mounted in Naphrax (Brunel Microscopes Ltd, UK) and examined by light microscopy. Permanent slides were prepared and observed using 100x oil-immersion objective (numerical aperture 1.4) (CEN, 2004). Identification was carried out to the highest possible taxonomic resolution. Images were taken using an Olympus DP70 camera. Undigested samples were used to check cell viability. The primary floras used in this study were Reference Krammer and Lange-BertalotKrammer and Lange-Bertalot (1986, Reference Krammer and Lange-Bertalot1991, Reference Krammer and Lange-Bertalot1997, Reference Krammer and Lange-Bertalot2000). Reference was also made to other literature specific to polar regions (Reference Sabbe, Verleyen, Hodgson, Vanhoutte and VyvermanSabbe and others, 2003; Reference EspositoEsposito and others, 2008; Reference Van, de Vijver and MataloniVan de Vijver and Mataloni, 2008; Reference Van de Vijver, Mataloni, Stanish and SpauldingVan de Vijver and others, 2010). Comparisons were made between the data obtained in the present study and other datasets of diatom assemblages from selected polar environments. Datasets of benthic diatom assemblages comprised: (1) diatom assemblages of sediment samples from lakes from Svalbard, obtained from the European Diatom Database (http://craticula.ncl.ac.uk/Eddi/); (2) epiphytic terrestrial diatom assemblages from moss samples in Edgeøya, Svalbard (Reference BeyensBeyens, 1989); (3) epiphytic diatom assemblages from ponds in Potter Peninsula, King George Island, Antarctica (Reference Vinocur and MaidanaVinocur and Maidana, 2010); and (4) diatom assemblages of microbial mats in the Larsemann Hills and Rauer Islands, East Antarctica (Reference Sabbe, Verleyen, Hodgson, Vanhoutte and VyvermanSabbe and others, 2003). The different diatom assemblages were reduced to genus level to examine spatial relationships between the sample sets. Taxonomic revisions followed the recent DARLEQ (Diatoms for Assessing River and Lake Ecological Quality) nomenclature (http://craticula.ncl.ac.uk/DARES/), and generic names were revised where necessary. We are aware that the culturing approach may have promoted the growth of some diatom species relative to others and any analyses based on the relative abundance of the diatoms could be misleading. To offset this problem, we adopted a presence–absence approach to compare samples and for the subsequent application of ordination techniques for the larger datasets. The divisive clustering method of two-way indicator species analysis (TWINSPAN; Reference HillHill, 1979) was used to investigate taxonomic structural similarities between the diatom floras of the samples using the Community Analysis Package (CAP version 4.1, Pisces Conservation). A detrended correspondence analysis (DCA; Reference Hill and GauchHill and Gauch, 1980; Reference Ter Braakter Braak, 1986) was used to examine spatial patterns using the computer program CANOCO version 4.5 (ter Reference Ter Braak and ŠmilauerBraak and Šmilauer, 2002). Genera recorded in two or fewer samples were removed prior to analysis.

Results

Species composition

Diatoms grew in all of the culture material but grew more abundantly in the Bold’s Basal and BG-11 media, along with many species of green algae and cyanobacteria. Only the results for diatoms are presented in this study. Cultured material from each medium type was pooled for subsequent analysis. Diatom species from 27 genera were identified in the material sampled from the cryoconite holes and cirque glacier site (Table 1). The total number of genera ranged from 12 (Frøya Glacier) to 17 (cirque glacier). A number of genera were common to all sites, namely Achnanthidium, Diadesmis, Mayamaea, Navicula, Nitzschia and Psammothidium. Only two species of Luticola were identified: L. nivalis and L. ventricosa (Fig. 1). Three other distinct forms were identified, though they could not be reliably assigned to any species in the literature and could be new taxa for this genus (personal communication from Reference Van de Vijver, Mataloni, Stanish and SpauldingB. van de Vijver, 2010). This genus was restricted to the Greenland cirque glacier. Diadesmis contenta (Fig. 1) grew particularly well in the cultured samples from this site but was also found in the material cultured from the three cryoconite hole samples. By contrast, Psammothidium helveticum dominated the cultured material from Frøya Glacier and Austre Brøggerbreen. Three species of Gomphonema, G. parvulum, G. olivace-oides and G. angustatum, were recorded from Austre Brøggerbreen, and four species of Nitzschia were found: N. amphibia, N. paleaeformis, N. paleacea and N. palea var. debilis (Fig. 1). The latter species dominated the samples from Vestre Brøggerbreen.

Table 1. Genera (with codes recorded in parentheses) from cryoconite in Austre Brøggerbreen (C1) and Vestre Brøggerbreen (C2), Svalbard, and Frøya Glacier (C3) and cirque glacier (RT1), Greenland

Fig. 1. Selected diatom species isolated from Arctic cryoconite. 1 . Luticola ventricosa. 2. Luticola nivalis. 3. Hantzschia amphioxys. 4. Nitzschia amphibia. 5. Nitzschia palea var. debilis. 6. Pinnularia borealis. 7. Diadesmis contenta. 8. Muelleria cf. terrestris. 9. Planothidium frequentissimum. 10. Reimeria sinuata. 1 1 . Psammothidium marginulata. 12. Psammothidium subatomoides. 13. Caloneis molaris. 14. Stauroneis (?) sp. 1 . 15. Meridion circulare. 16. Mayamaea atomus var. permitis.

Spatial comparisons

To examine associations between samples, comparisons were made, at the generic richness level, between the diatom assemblages collected from cryoconite material and those identified from previously published work in polar environments, totalling 73 sites. The first split of the TWINSPAN analysis separated the Antarctic lake samples from the rest of the samples, based on the more frequent co-occurrence of Stauroforma and Psammothidium in the benthic diatom samples taken from Antarctic lakes and more frequent co-occurrence of Navicula, Staurosirella, Staurosira, Encyonema, Caloneis, Nitzschia and Achnanthidium at the other sites. In the second quadrat division, all the Svalbard lake samples and the Frøya Glacier sample formed a group (n=24; TWINSPAN group 1), though the glacier sample was borderline in terms of assignment. Genera preferring this group included Achnanthidium, Diatoma, Fragilaria, Cymbella, Encyonema, Tabellaria and Staurosirella. The Greenland cirque glacier diatom assemblage and other samples from cryoconite holes formed a second group (TWINSPAN group 2) together with the samples of diatom assemblages from terrestrial mosses in Svalbard and diatoms sampled from both submerged and emergent mosses in three shallow ponds on the Potter Peninsula. Genera preferring TWINSPAN group 2 included Luticola and Muelleria. The Antarctic lake samples formed two further groups. Samples assigned to TWINSPAN group 3 (n = 14) commonly supported Luticola and Stauroneis, while lakes in group 4 were more typically represented by Amphora, Craticula and Planothidium.

Spatial segregation of the sites is shown in the DCA samples plot (Fig. 2a). The eigenvalues of axes 1 and 2 were 0.551 and 0.152 respectively, and collectively explain 3 1% of the cumulative percentage variance in the species data. Symbols differentiate the four TWINSPAN groups on the DCA and indicate the clear separation of Antarctic lake sites (open diamonds and circles), to the right of the ordination, from the Arctic lakes to the left (closed diamonds), based on the composition of the diatom assemblages at the generic level. The samples from two of the cryoconite holes in Svalbard, the cirque glacier in Greenland and aquatic and terrestrial moss communities from both the Arctic (coded E1–3) and Antarctica (coded P1–3) occupy a central position on the ordination between the two sets of lake sites (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. Detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) of diatom assemblages, analysed at the genus level, showing the first two axes of (a) sample plot and (b) species plot based on their diatom composition. Site codes for the Arctic are: S = Svalbard lakes; E = Edgeøya (Svalbard) terrestrial moss; C and RT1 = cryoconite. Site codes for the Antarctic are: P = Potter Peninusula ponds and L = lakes from Larsemann Hills and Rauer Islands. Symbols reflect four groupings from TWINSPAN analysis: closed diamonds are TWINSPAN group 1 ; closed circles are TWINSPAN group 2; open diamonds are TWINSPAN group 3; and open circles are TWINSPAN group 4. Taxa codes for diatoms found in cryoconite (see Table 1), with additional codes: Dent = Denticula, Crat = Craticula, Amp = Amphora, Cham = Chamaepinnularia, Staf = Stauroforma, Aul = Aulacoseira, Neid = Neidium, Pseu= Pseudostaurosira, Bra = Brachysira, Staa = Staurosira, Cycl = Cyclotella, Stel = Staurosirella, Cymb = Cymbella, Dipl = Diploneis, Tab = Tabellaria.

The DCA species biplot (Fig. 2b) displays the main variation in the diatom genera. The diatom genera Craticula, Stauroforma, Amphora, Diadesmis and Psammothidium situated more to the right of the ordination were commonly recorded in the benthic diatom samples in Antarctic lakes. Craticula, Amphora and Stauroforma were not recorded in any of the cryoconite samples analysed in the present investigation from the Arctic cryoconite. Some species common to all the cryoconite samples including Achnanthidium, Nitzschia and Navicula were positioned to the left of centre, along axis 1 , and were more commonly found co-occurring in Arctic assemblages. Along axis 2, a number of genera positioned towards the positive and negative end, including Eunotia, Brachysira, Surirella, Denticula, Neidium and Diploneis, were commonly recorded for some of the Svalbard lakes. These genera were notably absent from the Antarctic lake samples, though recorded as occasional or rare in the moss samples in Potter Peninsula. Surirella was recorded in Austre Brøggerbreen, and Eunotia and Frustulia were recorded in the cryoconite from Frøya Glacier, though no records of the other four genera were recorded in other cryoconite material sampled during this study.

Discussion

Generic richness

The number of diatom cells in the raw cryoconite debris was relatively low, necessitating culturing to obtain a sufficient sample size. In studies of diatom species composition, the organic matter usually has to be removed to expose the frustules to obtain the required taxonomic resolution. One of the criticisms of these currently employed methods is that it is impossible to distinguish between living and dead cells. Empty frustules could therefore be included in cell counts. Between 12 and 15 live diatom genera were recorded in the cryoconite holes, and 17 genera were recorded for the cirque glacier. Although some genera were common to all samples, there were differences and, in total, 27 live genera were recorded. These numbers are comparable with mean local and regional numbers of diatom genera recorded from large-scale analyses of lakes in similar latitudes in the Northern Hemisphere (Reference VyvermanVyverman and others, 2010), which suggests that cryoconite may support a similar diatom richness to that of surrounding lacustrine environments. The number of live genera recorded was higher than has previously been recorded in cryoconite holes. Reference Mueller, Vincent, Pollard, Fritsen, Elster, Seckbach, Vincent and LhotskyMueller and others (2001) found many different diatom frustules in Canada Glacier, McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica, though only species in the genus Muelleria were regularly recorded as living. In agreement with this study, a number of species of Luticola were noted, though their relative abundance, compared to other algae and cyanobacteria, was low. Seven species of diatom belonging to three genera, Achnanthes, Synedra and Gomphonema, were found in cryoconite holes on North Glacier, Mount Athabasca, Alberta, Canada (Reference Wharton and VinyardWharton and Vinyard, 1983). In other studies, no diatoms were found (Reference BroadyBroady, 1989; Reference Sawstrom, Mumford, Marshall, Hodson and Laybourn-ParrySawstrom and others, 2002). Pennate diatoms have previously been recorded in cryoconite from the glacial surfaces in Svalbard, but cyanobacteria were found to be numerically dominant compared to microalgae (Reference Stibal, Sabacka and KaštovskáStibal and others, 2006), a finding corroborated in other studies (e.g. Reference Mueller, Vincent, Pollard, Fritsen, Elster, Seckbach, Vincent and LhotskyMueller and others, 2001). Evidence obtained during this study indicates that cryoconite in Svalbard and Greenland can support a relatively high number of viable diatom genera.

Cell viability and sources of colonizing diatoms

The diatoms and other photosynthetic microbes in the cryoconite samples cultured in this study had previously been frozen (∼1–2 years), yet retained their viability. Freshwater pennate benthic diatoms are frequently recorded to form resting cells that can survive adverse conditions (Reference Sicko-GoadSicko-Goad, 1986). In particular, subaerial or aerophytic diatom species that commonly inhabit rock or soil can survive desiccation for long periods of time (Reference Round, Crawford and MannRound and others, 1990). A number of diatoms found in the cryoconite during this investigation including species of Diadesmis, Pinnularia, Hantzschia and Luticola are aerophytic. Aerophytic diatoms are less tolerant to desiccation than cyanobacteria (Reference Poulíčkova and HašlerPoulíčková and Hašler, 2007), and moisture content may be crucial to their survival (Reference Van de Vijver and BeyensVan de Vijver and Beyens, 1997). Some species within the genus Luticola (e.g. L. nivalis) are halophilous and can tolerate more saline conditions which may be experienced in areas of high evaporation. A number of representatives of this genus were recorded on the Greenland cirque glacier, where evaporative losses may be elevated, though they were not recorded elsewhere. Some of the diatom taxa recorded in the cryoconite are commonly recorded on mosses (e.g. Nitzschia palea var. debilis; Hantzschia amphioxys; Pinnularia borealis) or are truly epiphytic (e.g. Planothidium and Gomphonema species (Reference Vinocur and MaidanaVinocur and Maidana, 2010)), and cryoconite samples containing these shared a similar location on the ordination plot to those diatom assemblages sampled from aquatic, terrestrial or semi-terrestrial mosses from both the Arctic and Antarctica (Fig. 2a). Other motile, epipelic species in the genera Navicula, typically associated with lake or stream sediments, were also common in the cryoconite material. The presence of diatoms from a wide range of terrestrial, semi-terrestrial and aquatic sources indicates that cryoconites may act as a reservoir, accumulating a number of diatom species from a variety of local sources. Many of these diatom cells may be growing in conditions that fall outside their optima in terms of environmental preference, which would explain their relatively low abundance compared to other major autotrophic groups. However, their proven viability from the culturing techniques adopted in this study indicates that while diatoms may not be numerically dominant in cryoconite, the debris may contain a number of viable diatom cells. Given the tolerance of many of the diatom genera recorded in the cryoconite to desiccation and/or freezing, these cells could also serve to propagate other areas following ablation.

Comparisons between microbial assemblages in different types of supraglacial habitats indicate variation in the composition and relative abundance of species. Cyanobacteria-dominated cryoconite material and algae (mainly greens) were considered as ‘accessory’ organisms (Reference Kaštovská, Elster, Stibal and ŠantruckováKaštovská and others 2005). Chemical and physical properties were found to be overriding factors determining the fate of microbial cells deposited on the glacial surface (Reference Stibal, Sabacka and KaštovskáStibal and others, 2006). It is likely that only those diatom genera capable of tolerating low moisture content, or relatively higher salinity or conductivity (e.g. some species in the genera Pinnularia and Luticola), may proliferate in soil habitats including vegetated soils (Reference Van de Vijver and BeyensVan de Vijver and Beyens, 1997).

A number of the benthic diatom species recorded in this study (e.g. Achnanthidium minutissimum, Planothidium lanceolatum, Stauroneis anceps, Encyonema minutum, Nitzschia palea), commonly recorded in periphytic communities of lakes and rivers in European waters (Reference King, Clarke, Bennion, Kelly and YallopKing and others, 2006; Reference KellyKelly and others, 2008), are psychrotolerant rather than obligately cold-tolerant (Reference Seaburg and ParkerSeaburg and Parker, 1983), so they should be able to grow well in higher temperatures at lower altitudes and latitudes.

We recorded a number of ‘pioneer’ species in the cryoconite material belonging to three genera, Gomphonema spp., Achnanthidium spp. and Cocconeis spp., and these species typically represent the starting point in successional processes leading potentially to mature biofilms in lentic and lotic environments (Reference Yallop, Kelly, Crawford, Moss, Mann and PreisigYallop and Kelly, 2006). Diatom assemblages supporting the latter two of these taxa typify relatively ‘pristine’ waters indicating a ‘reference state’, defined by European legislation as sites relatively unimpacted by human activity (Water Framework Directive (WFD; EU, 2000). These pioneer cells are fast colonizers with rapid growth rates and adopt the R-selected life-history strategy (i.e. opportunistic species with high intrinsic growth rates) within a habitat matrix of disturbance frequency and nutrient resource supply (Reference Biggs, Stevenson and LoweBiggs and others, 1998; Reference Yallop, Kelly, Crawford, Moss, Mann and PreisigYallop and Kelly, 2006). Typically, in relatively undisturbed habitats, S-selected (i.e. stress-tolerant) species, including more green algae, and cyanobacteria as well as other diatoms, would join the pioneer species once the biomass increased and competition for resources became more intense. Many of these species may be nitrogen fixers (Reference Biggs, Stevenson and LoweBiggs and others, 1998). An isolated empty frustule of an S-selected diatom, Rhopalodia gibba, which contains nitrogen-fixing endosymbionts, was recorded in the material from cryoconite on Vestre Brøggerbreen (Yallop, unpublished data). The window of opportunity for further colonization of the cryoconite holes in the Arctic is limited to a period of weeks during the summer when the cryoconite holes are open. This period of time may be insufficient to allow for biofilms to reach a more mature stage. Repeated destabilization events and constant physical (e.g. flushing) and biological (e.g. grazing) stress may result in only the R-selected functional group surviving in the cryoconite holes. The unique habitat within the cryoconites may favour the growth of cyanobacteria and green algae, thereby accounting for the relatively low biomass of diatoms.

Origin of diatoms in cryoconite

The diatom assemblages from the cryoconite material bore many similarities, at the generic level, to the assemblages in some of the lakes from Svalbard, which could indicate they were a likely source of propagules for cryoconites. Reference Jones and BirksJones and Birks (2004) found that these lakes were split into three groups, based on the relative abundance of diatoms, at the species level, separated along gradients of pH, alkalinity, concentrations of cations, and conductivity. The diatom assemblages in the cryoconite material shared more similarities with their TWINSPAN group 2 sites which were sites of relatively lower pH, low Ca and lower conductivity. Limnological measurements of meltwaters of glaciers in the Arctic generally indicate acidic conditions of very low conductivity (Reference Remias, Holzinger and LützRemias and others, 2009). The lower pH of cryoconite holes may impose limitations on the growth of species with relatively higher pH optima. These variables have also been found to be important determinants in the spatial distribution of diatom assemblages in other polar habitats (Reference Antoniades, Douglas and SmolAntoniades and others, 2005; Reference Michelutti, Smol, Douglas and DouglasMichelutti and others, 2006). Differences between the diatom assemblages from the cryoconite samples in Greenland and Svalbard may be due to differences in pH and associated correlates of the meltwaters at these sites. The presence of acid-loving genera Eunotia and Frustulia in the Greenland samples, and their absence from the Svalbard samples, lends further support to this argument. The lack of similarity between the diatom assemblages of the cryoconite material and most of the Antarctic lakes is not surprising given the relatively high chloride concentrations of Antarctic lakes which favoured species like Craticula, not recorded in the cryoconite samples taken in this study.

Analysis of debris from the cryoconite on the surface of snow on a Himalayan glacier indicated the presence of some fragments of plant origin (Reference Takeuchi, Kohshima and SekoTakeuchi and others, 2001). Moss fragments could come from local aquatic and terrestrial sources and serve as vehicles for diatom transport to cryoconite holes. Additional propagules may arrive from geographically distant sources by aeolian transport. The observation that moss-derived diatom assemblages from Potter Peninsula bore a number of similarities to samples from the Arctic may be indicative of the taxonomic resolution of the study (i.e. generic rather than specific). Ongoing and recent advances in our understanding of the taxonomy and environmental preferences of some of the key taxa inhabiting these environments will help to address these questions (Reference Van, de Vijver and MataloniVan de Vijver and Mataloni, 2008; Reference Van de Vijver, Mataloni, Stanish and SpauldingVan de Vijver and others, 2010). The degree of endemism in Antarctic diatom samples is considered to be relatively high, which may be explained by their relative isolation compared with Arctic communities. At the generic level, we identified broadly distinct patterns of site groupings. A generic-level analysis may not work in every situation (Reference Chessman, Growns, Currey and Plunkett-ColeChessman and others, 1999), as some genera (e.g. Navicula) contain species with a wide range of ecological tolerance (Reference LoweLowe, 1974). However, using this higher level of taxonomy is still advantageous, given the degree of difficulty associated with identification of diatoms at the species level and the further complexities of cryptic and pseudo-cryptic species (Reference Mann, Evans, Brodie and LewisMann and Evans, 2007; Reference VanelslanderVanelslander and others, 2009). In situations where the genera are not particularly speciose, a generic level of analysis may be sufficient to pick up signals of environmental change, as found by Reference GrownsGrowns (1999), and this may be the case in polar environments. In accordance with Reference Bouchard, Gajewski and HamiltonBouchard and others (2004), our findings lend support to the use of these more ‘natural groupings’ to understand patterns of biogeography and environmental inference.

As glaciers retreat, the diatom cells residing in cryoconite have the potential to act as seeding agents for a variety of terrestrial and aquatic habitats in proglacial sites, which, given the large surface area covered by cryoconite holes, may present a greater contribution than had previously been realized.

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the helpful comments provided by two anonymous reviewers. Thanks also to T. Colborn for producing the figures. We would like to thank H. Hirst for her help with identification of some of the diatom species. This work was undertaken with support from a UK Natural Environment Research Council grant NE/G00496X/1.

References

Anesio, A.M., Hodson, A.J., Fritz, A., Psenner, R. and Sattler, B.. 2009. High microbial activity on glaciers: importance to the global carbon cycle. Global Change Biol., 15(4), 955960.Google Scholar
Antoniades, D., Douglas, M.S.V. and Smol, J.P.. 2005. Benthic diatom autecology and inference model development from the Canadian High Arctic archipelago. J. Phycol., 41(1), 3045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baas-Becking, L.G.M. 1934. Geobiologie of inleiding tot de milieukunde. In Van Stockum, W.P. and Zoon, N.V., eds. Diligentia Wetensch, serie 18/19. The Hague, Van Stockum’s Gravenhange.Google Scholar
Beakes, G.W., Canter, H.M. and Jaworski, G.H.M.. 1988. Zoospore ultrastructure of Zygorhizidium affluens and Z. planktonicum, two chytrids parasitizing the diatom Asterionella formosa . Can. J. Bot., 66(6), 10541067.Google Scholar
Beyens, L. 1989. Moss dwelling diatom assemblages from Edgeøya (Svalbard). Polar Biol., 9(7), 423430.Google Scholar
Biggs, B.J.F., Stevenson, R.J. and Lowe, R.L.. 1998. A habitat matrix conceptual model for stream periphyton. Arch. Hydrobiol., 143(1), 2156.Google Scholar
Bouchard, G., Gajewski, K. and Hamilton, P.B.. 2004. Freshwater diatom biogeography in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. J. Biogeogr., 31(12), 19551973.Google Scholar
Broady, P.A. 1989. Survey of algae and other terrestrial biota at Edward VII Peninsula, Marie Byrd Land. Antarct. Sci., 1(3), 215224.Google Scholar
Chessman, B., Growns, I., Currey, J. and Plunkett-Cole, N.. 1999. Predicting diatom communities at the genus level for the rapid biological assessment of rivers. Freshwater Biol., 41(2), 317331.Google Scholar
Christner, B.C., Kvito, B.H. and Reeve, J.N.. 2003. Molecular identification of bacteria and eukarya inhabiting an Antarctic cryoconite hole. Extremophiles, 7(3), 177183.Google Scholar
Comité Européen de Normalisation (CEN). 2004. Water quality: guidance standard for the identification, enumeration and interpretation of benthic diatom samples from running waters. Geneva, Comité Européen de Normalisation. (European Standard EN 14407.)Google Scholar
De Smet, W.H. and van Rompu, E.A.. 1994. Rotifera and Tardigrada from some cryoconite holes on a Spitsbergen (Svalbard) glacier. Belg. J. Zool., 124(1), 2737.Google Scholar
Elster, , J. and Komarek, O.. 2003. Ecology of periphyton in a meltwater stream ecosystem in the maritime Antarctic. Antarct. Sci., 15(2), 189201.Google Scholar
Esposito, R.M.M. and 7 others. 2008. Inland diatoms from the McMurdo Dry Valleys and James Ross Island, Antarctica. Botany, 86(12), 13781392.Google Scholar
European Union (EU). 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Off. J. Eur. Comm., 43, L327, 1173.Google Scholar
Finlay, B.J., Monaghan, E.B. and Maberly, S.C.. 2002. Hypothesis: the rate and scale of dispersal of freshwater diatom species is a function of their global abundance. Protist, 153(3), 261273.Google Scholar
Growns, I. 1999. Is genus or species identification of periphytic diatoms required to determine the impacts of river regulation? J. Appl. Phycol., 11(3), 273283.Google Scholar
Hill, M. O. 1979. TWINSPAN: a FORTRAN program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two-way table by classification of the individuals and attributes. Ithaca, NY, Cornell University. Section of Ecology and Systematics.Google Scholar
Hill, M.O. and Gauch, H.G.. 1980. Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio, 42(1–3), 4758.Google Scholar
Jones, V.J. 1996. The diversity, distribution and ecology of diatoms from Antarctic inland waters. Biodiv. Conserv., 5(11), 14331449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, V.J. and Birks, H.J.B.. 2004. Lake-sediment records of recent environmental change on Svalbard: results of diatom analysis. J. Paleolimnol., 31(4), 445466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaštovská, K., Elster, J., Stibal, M. and Šantrucková, H.. 2005. Microbial assemblages in soil microbial succession after glacial retreat in Svalbard (High Arctic). Microbial Ecol., 50(3), 396407.Google Scholar
Kelly, M.G. and 9 others. 2007. Use of diatoms for evaluating ecological status in UK freshwaters. Bristol, Environment Agency. (Science Report SC030103/SR2.)Google Scholar
Kelly, M. and 7 others. 2008. Assessment of ecological status in U.K. rivers using diatoms. Freshwater Biol., 53(2), 403422.Google Scholar
King, L., Clarke, G., Bennion, H., Kelly, M. and Yallop, M.. 2006. Recommendations for sampling littoral diatoms in lakes for ecological status assessments. J. Appl. Phycol., 18(1), 1525.Google Scholar
Kociolek, J.P. and Spaulding, S.A.. 2001. Freshwater diatom biogeography. Nova Hedwigia, 71(1–2), 223241.Google Scholar
Krammer, K. and Lange-Bertalot, H.. 1986. Die Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa 2: Bacillariophyceae. 1 Teil: Naviculacaea. Stuttgart, Gustav Fischer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Krammer, K. and Lange-Bertalot, H.. 1991. Die Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa 2: Bacillariophyceae. 4 Teil: Achnanthaceae. Kritische Ergänzungen zu Navicula (Lineolatae) und Gomphonema. Stuttgart, Gustav Fischer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Krammer, K. and Lange-Bertalot, H.. 1997. Die Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa 2: Bacillariophyceae. 2 Teil: Bacillariaceae, Epithemiaceae, Sururellaciae. Stuttgart, Gustav Fischer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Krammer, K. and Lange-Bertalot, H.. 2000. Die Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa 2: Bacillariophyceae. 3 Teil: Centrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae. Stuttgart, Gustav Fischer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Laybourn-Parry, J. 2009. Microbiology: no place too cold. Science, 324(5934), 15211522.Google Scholar
Lowe, R.L. 1974. Environmental requirements and pollution tolerance of freshwater diatoms. Cincinnati, OH, US Environmental Protection Agency. (Environ. Monitor. Ser. EPA-670/4-74-005.)Google Scholar
Mann, D.G. and Droop, S.J.M.. 1996. Biodiversity, biogeography and conservation of diatoms. Hydrobiologia, 336(1–3), 1932.Google Scholar
Mann, D.G. and Evans, K.M.. 2007. Molecular genetics and the neglected art of diatomics. In Brodie, J. and Lewis, J., eds. Unravelling the algae: the past, present, and future of algal systematics. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press, 231265.Google Scholar
Michelutti, N., Smol, J.P., Douglas, J.P. and Douglas, M.S.V.. 2006. Ecological characteristics of modern diatom assemblages from Axel Heiberg Island (High Arctic Canada) and their application to paleolimnological inference models. Can. J. Bot., 84(11), 16951713.Google Scholar
Mueller, D.R. and Pollard, W.H.. 2004. Gradient analysis of cryoconite ecosystems from two polar glaciers. Polar Biol., 27(2), 6674.Google Scholar
Mueller, D.R., Vincent, W.F., Pollard, W.H. and Fritsen, C.H.. 2001. Glacial cryoconite ecosystems: a bipolar comparison of algal communities and habitats. In Elster, J., Seckbach, J., Vincent, W.F. and Lhotsky, O., eds. Algae and extreme environments: ecology and physiology. Berlin, etc., J. Cramer in der Gebr. Borntraeger Verlagsbuchhandlung, 173197. (Nova Hedwigia Beiheft 123.)Google Scholar
Nichols, H.W. 1973. Growth media: marine. In Stein, J.R., ed. Handbook of phycological methods: culture methods and growth measurements. Cambridge, etc., Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Porazinska, D.L., Fountain, A.G., Nylen, T.H., Tranter, M., Virginia, R.A. and Wall, D.H.. 2004. The biodiversity and biogeochemistry of cryoconite holes from McMurdo Dry Valley glaciers, Antarctica. Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res., 36(1), 8491.Google Scholar
Poulíčkova, A. and Hašler, P.. 2007. Aerophytic diatoms from caves in central Moravia (Czech Republic). Preslia, 79, 185204.Google Scholar
Remias, D., Holzinger, A. and Lütz, C.. 2009. Physiology, ultrastructure and habitat of the ice alga Mesotaenium berggrenii (Zygnemaphyceae, Chlorophyta) from glaciers in the European Alps. Phycologia, 48(4), 302312.Google Scholar
Round, F.E., Crawford, R.M. and Mann, D.G.. 1990. The diatoms: biology and morphology of the genera. Cambridge, etc., Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sabbe, K., Verleyen, E., Hodgson, D.A., Vanhoutte, K. and Vyverman, W.. 2003. Benthic diatom flora of freshwater and saline lakes in the Larsemann Hills and Rauer Islands, East Antarctica. Antarct. Sci., 15(2), 227248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabbe, K. and 6 others. 2004. Salinity, depth and the structure and composition of microbial mats in continental Antarctic lakes. Freshwater Biol., 49(3), 296319.Google Scholar
Sawstrom, C., Mumford, P., Marshall, W., Hodson, A. and Laybourn-Parry, J.. 2002. The microbial communities and primary productivity of cryconite holes in an Arctic glacier (Svalbard 798N). Polar Biol., 25(8), 591596.Google Scholar
Seaburg, K.G. and Parker, B.C.. 1983. Seasonal differences in the temperature ranges of growth of Virginia algae. J. Phycol., 19(4), 380386.Google Scholar
Sicko-Goad, L. 1986. Rejuvenation of Melosira granulata (Bacillariophyceae) resting cells from the anoxic sediments of Douglas Lake, Michigan. II. Electron microscopy. J. Phycol., 22(1), 2835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spaulding, S.A. and McKnight, D.M.. 1999. Diatoms as indicators of environmental change in Antarctic freshwaters. In Stoermer, E.F. and Smol, J.P., eds. The diatoms: applications for the environmental and earth sciences. Cambridge, etc., Cambridge University Press, 245263.Google Scholar
Stanier, R.Y., Kunisawa, R., Mandel, M. and Cohen-Bazire, G.. 1971. Purification and properties of unicellular blue-green algae (order Chroococcales). Bacteriol. Rev., 35(2), 171205.Google Scholar
Steinböck, O. 1936. Über Kryokonitlöcher und ihre biologische Bedeutung. Z. Gletscherkd., 24, 121.Google Scholar
Stibal, M., Sabacka, M. and Kaštovská, K.. 2006. Microbial communities on glacier surfaces in Svalbard: impact of physical and chemical properties on abundance and structure of cyanobacteria and algae. Microbial Ecol., 52(4), 644654.Google Scholar
Takeuchi, N., Kohshima, S. and Seko, K.. 2001. Structure, formation, and darkening process of albedo-reducing material (cryoconite) on a Himalayan glacier: a granular algal mat growing on the glacier. Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res., 33(2), 115122.Google Scholar
Ter Braak, C.J.F. 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology, 67(5), 11671179.Google Scholar
Ter Braak, C.J.F. and Šmilauer, P.. 2002. CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user’s guide: software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5). Ithaca, NY, Microcomputer Power.Google Scholar
Van de Vijver, B. and Beyens, L.. 1997. The epiphytic diatom flora of mosses from Strømness Bay area, South Georgia. Polar Biol., 17(6), 492501.Google Scholar
Van, de Vijver, B. and Mataloni, G.. 2008. New and interesting species in the genus Luticola D.G. Mann (Bacillariophyta) from Deception Island (South Shetland Islands). Phycologia, 47(5), 451467.Google Scholar
Van de Vijver, B., Gremmen, N.J.M. and Beyens, L.. 2005. The genus Stauroneis (Bacillariophyceae) in the Antarctic region. J. Biogeogr., 32(10), 17911798.Google Scholar
Van de Vijver, B., Mataloni, G., Stanish, L. and Spaulding, S.A.. 2010. New and interesting species of the genus Muelleria (Bacillariophyta) from the Antarctic region and South Africa. Phycologia, 49(1), 2241.Google Scholar
Vanelslander, B. and 9 others. 2009. Ecological differentiation between sympatric pseudocryptic species in the estuarine benthic diatom Bavicular phyllepta (Bacillariophyceae). J. Phycol., 45(6), 12781289.Google Scholar
Vanormelingen, P., Verleyen, E. and Vyverman, W.. 2008. The diversity and distribution of diatoms: from cosmopolitanism to narrow endemism. Biodivers. Conserv., 17(2), 393405.Google Scholar
Verleyen, E. and 13 others. 2009. The importance of dispersal related and local factors in shaping the taxonomic structure of diatom metacommunities. Oikos, 118(8), 12391249.Google Scholar
Vincent, W.F. 2000. Cyanobacterial dominance in the polar regions. In Whitton, B.A. and Potts, M., eds. The ecology of cyanobacteria: their diversity in time and space. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic, 321340.Google Scholar
Vinocur, A. and Maidana, N.I.. 2010. Spatial and temporal variations in moss-inhabiting summer diatom communities from Potter Peninsula (King George Island, Antarctica). Polar Biol., 33(4), 443455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vyverman, W. and 9 others. 2010. Evidence for widespread endemism among Antarctic micro-organisms. Polar Sci., 4(2), 103113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wharton, R.A. Jr and Vinyard, W.C.. 1983. Distribution of snow and ice algae in western North America. Madroño, 30, 201209.Google Scholar
Wharton, R.A. Jr, McKay, C.P., Simmons, G.M. Jr and Parker, B.C.. 1985. Cryoconite holes on glaciers. BioScience, 35(8), 499503.Google Scholar
Yallop, M.L. and Kelly, M.G.. 2006. From pattern to process: understanding stream phytobenthic assemblages and implications for determining ‘ecological status’. In Crawford, R.M., Moss, B., Mann, D.G. and Preisig, H.R., eds. Microalgal biology, evolution and ecology. Berlin, etc., J. Cramer in der Gebr. Borntraeger Verlagsbuchhandlung, 357372. (Nova Hedwegia Beheifte 130.)Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Genera (with codes recorded in parentheses) from cryoconite in Austre Brøggerbreen (C1) and Vestre Brøggerbreen (C2), Svalbard, and Frøya Glacier (C3) and cirque glacier (RT1), Greenland

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Selected diatom species isolated from Arctic cryoconite. 1 . Luticola ventricosa. 2. Luticola nivalis. 3. Hantzschia amphioxys. 4. Nitzschia amphibia. 5. Nitzschia palea var. debilis. 6. Pinnularia borealis. 7. Diadesmis contenta. 8. Muelleria cf. terrestris. 9. Planothidium frequentissimum. 10. Reimeria sinuata. 1 1 . Psammothidium marginulata. 12. Psammothidium subatomoides. 13. Caloneis molaris. 14. Stauroneis (?) sp. 1 . 15. Meridion circulare. 16. Mayamaea atomus var. permitis.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) of diatom assemblages, analysed at the genus level, showing the first two axes of (a) sample plot and (b) species plot based on their diatom composition. Site codes for the Arctic are: S = Svalbard lakes; E = Edgeøya (Svalbard) terrestrial moss; C and RT1 = cryoconite. Site codes for the Antarctic are: P = Potter Peninusula ponds and L = lakes from Larsemann Hills and Rauer Islands. Symbols reflect four groupings from TWINSPAN analysis: closed diamonds are TWINSPAN group 1 ; closed circles are TWINSPAN group 2; open diamonds are TWINSPAN group 3; and open circles are TWINSPAN group 4. Taxa codes for diatoms found in cryoconite (see Table 1), with additional codes: Dent = Denticula, Crat = Craticula, Amp = Amphora, Cham = Chamaepinnularia, Staf = Stauroforma, Aul = Aulacoseira, Neid = Neidium, Pseu= Pseudostaurosira, Bra = Brachysira, Staa = Staurosira, Cycl = Cyclotella, Stel = Staurosirella, Cymb = Cymbella, Dipl = Diploneis, Tab = Tabellaria.