Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T16:34:19.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

HUME, KANT, AND FEUERBACH: WHY THE ANTHROPOMORPHIC CRITIQUE REVEALS A FALSE DILEMMA BETWEEN NATURALISTIC ATHEISM AND ANTI-NATURALISTIC THEISM - ERRATUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2020

Chris Byron  and
Jesse Lopes

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Erratum
Information
Think , Volume 19 , Issue 55 , Summer 2020 , pp. 139
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2020

In the article ‘HUME, KANT, AND FEUERBACH: WHY THE ANTHROPOMORPHIC CRITIQUE REVEALS A FALSE DILEMMA BETWEEN NATURALISTIC ATHEISM AND ANTI-NATURALISTIC THEISM’,Reference Chris and Lopes1 the first author Chris Byron was wrongly listed as Christopher Byron. This error also appeared on the contents page and in the contents list on the outside back cover. The publisher apologises for this error.

References

1Chris, Byron and Lopes, Jesse (2019) ‘Hume, Kant, and Feuerbach: Why the Anthropomorphic Critique Reveals a False Dilemma Between Naturalistic Atheism and Anti-Naturalistic Theism’, Think 19(54): 55–67.Google Scholar