Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-vmclg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-26T21:30:11.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An engraved tooth pendant from Donkalnis, western Lithuania: a rare discovery in a Mesolithic burial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2025

Adomas Butrimas
Affiliation:
Institute of Art Research, Vilnius Academy of Arts, Lithuania
Marius Iršėnas
Affiliation:
Institute of Art Research, Vilnius Academy of Arts, Lithuania
Aija Macāne
Affiliation:
Department of Cultures, University of Helsinki, Finland Institute of Latvian History, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
Kristiina Mannermaa*
Affiliation:
Department of Cultures, University of Helsinki, Finland
Kerkko Nordqvist
Affiliation:
Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies, University of Helsinki, Finland
Tomas Rimkus*
Affiliation:
Institute of Art Research, Vilnius Academy of Arts, Lithuania Institute of Baltic Region History and Archaeology, Klaipėda University, Lithuania
*
*Authors for correspondence ✉ tomas.rimkus@ku.lt & kristiina.mannermaa@helsinki.fi
*Authors for correspondence ✉ tomas.rimkus@ku.lt & kristiina.mannermaa@helsinki.fi
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A re-examination of animal tooth pendants from Mesolithic (c. 9000–5000 BC in Lithuania) graves at Donkalnis (western Lithuania) revealed one engraved specimen. Among the hundreds of pendants reported for this period in the eastern Baltic, engravings are rare. The discovery offers new insights into the human-animal relationships reflected in northern forager burial traditions.

Type
Project Gallery
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Antiquity Publications Ltd

Introduction

Between 1981 and 1986, two Stone Age burial sites were excavated on the former islands of Donkalnis and Spiginas in Lake Biržulis, western Lithuania. Most graves were filled with ochre-rich soil and many contained multiple perforated or unperforated animal teeth (Butrimas Reference Butrimas2012). The buried individuals have been the subject of many studies (e.g. Simčenka et al. Reference Simčenka, Kozakaitė, Piličiauskienė, Gaižauskas and Piličiauskas2022), but the animal remains have received less attention (but see Osipowicz et al. Reference Osipowicz, Piličiauskienė, Piličiauskas and Orłowska2024). Animal teeth are the most common artefacts found in European hunter-gatherer burials, and the Eurasian elk (Alces alces) is one of the species most frequently used to produce tooth pendants in north-eastern Europe (Mannermaa et al. Reference Mannermaa, Rainio, Girya and Gerasimov2021; Macāne Reference Maca¯ne2022). As part of our research project, scholars from Finland, Latvia and Lithuania are focusing on these teeth to better understand human-animal relationships in this region and period in prehistory, and their role in symbolism and the construction of identities. During the analysis of previously excavated material, short horizontal incisions were identified on a perforated Eurasian elk incisor from Grave 5 at Donkalnis. In our experience, engraved tooth pendants are rare in European hunter-gatherer burials; therefore, we present here the first analysis of the pendant and its engraving.

Donkalnis Grave 5

The Donkalnis burial site is in the northern part of Lake Biržulis (Figure 1). Seven graves as well as loose human bones have been found here (Butrimas Reference Butrimas2012). Two subadults, respectively aged 7–7.5 years and under five years, were buried in Grave 5 (Figure 2), which had been abundantly filled with red ochre and is radiocarbon dated to c. 6000–5900 BC (Simčenka et al. Reference Simčenka, Kozakaitė, Piličiauskienė, Gaižauskas and Piličiauskas2022). The grave included a microlithic flint point and 45 animal tooth pendants: 19 of aurochs (Bos primigenius) or European bison (Bison bonasus), 24 of red deer (Cervus elaphus) and two of Eurasian elk.

Figure 1. A) location of Biržulis Lake; B) Biržulis Lake and Donkalnis burial ground (red square); C) aerial view of Donkalnis burial ground (red arrow) (figure by A. Butrimas & T. Rimkus).

Figure 2. Donkalnis Grave 5 (figure by A. Butrimas).

Engraved tooth pendant

The engraved pendant (National Museum of Lithuania, EM2248:466) is made from the first right incisor of a Eurasian elk. The length of the artefact is 43mm and the maximum width is 9mm. The root is flattened, perforated on the mesial and distal sides and ornamented on three sides with incised rows of 1–3mm-long and 0.1–0.6mm-wide regular grooves (Figures 3 & 4). Each surface is characterised by a distinct number of incisions: six on the distal, 12 on the mesial and 18 on the labial surface (Figure 5: 1A–B, 2C–D, 3D–G, respectively). The incisions are arranged in groups of two to four, spaced 1.7–4.1mm apart. The tooth surface is relatively well preserved, with only minor flaking of the enamel, and there is no indication that further incisions have been eroded. Unfortunately, the specimen was consolidated with chemicals after excavation in the 1980s. This has obscured most of the working traces and restricts the possibility of more detailed microscopic analysis (see also Osipowicz et al. Reference Osipowicz, Piličiauskienė, Piličiauskas and Orłowska2024: 8–9).

Figure 3. Engraved tooth pendant made from a Eurasian elk incisor and found in Grave 5, showing the labial (A), distal (B), mesial (C) and lingual (D) views (figure by T. Rimkus).

Figure 4. Illustrations of the labial (A), distal (B), mesial (C) and lingual (D) views of the engraved tooth pendant from Grave 5 (figure by M. Gintalas).

Figure 5. Microscopic examination of groove patterns on different surfaces of the pendant (1, distal; 2, mesial; 3, labial) (figure by T. Rimkus).

Insights into past worldviews

Other incised tooth pendants from Mesolithic north-eastern Europe include a Eurasian elk incisor from Popovo (Grave VIII) and a carnivore canine tooth from Stanovoye 4, both in Russia (Płonka Reference Płonka2003; Oshibkina Reference Oshibkina, Grünberg, Gramsch, Larsson, Orschiedt and Meller2016). Engravings are also found on a red deer incisor tooth from the Late Mesolithic site of Smakkerup Huse in Denmark (Price & Gebauer Reference Price and Gebauer2005). In each case, the engraved patterns differ from the Lithuanian specimen.

A striking feature of the Donkalnis pendant is the systematic structure of the grooves, engraved on each side in multiples of the number six (or three; see also Jonuks Reference Jonuks, Grünberg, Gramsch, Petersen, Płonka and Meller2023). This indicates a particular logic and intent motivating the incisions. Could they represent a mnemonic aid or a recording system, are they symbolic or purely aesthetic engravings? Incised patterns, although rare on tooth pendants, are more numerous on other artefacts from the Mesolithic; horizontal lines are one of the most frequent geometric motifs incised on bone and other artefacts and are recorded throughout Europe (Płonka Reference Płonka2003; Grünberg et al. Reference Grünberg, Gramsch, Brinch Petersen, Płonka and Meller2023). Interpretations of these engravings range from simple decorations to representations of symbolic concepts, including communication and protective functions (e.g. Vang Petersen Reference Vang Petersen2021), although the exact meanings of the marks are no longer directly decipherable.

A potential clue to the significance of the incisions could lie in the animal species chosen. The Eurasian elk held a central role in the worldviews of prehistoric people in northern Europe (Macāne Reference Maca¯ne2022), and its incisors were commonly selected for pendants. Yet, only two elk teeth were present in Grave 5—one of them engraved. In other words, a commonplace species was treated in an unusual way through the addition of engravings. This underlines the situational nature of what is ‘common’ or ‘special’ and exemplifies the multi-relational ontologies of hunter-gatherers. The semantics of the pattern (number three and its multiples) and its occurrence on other osseous media are lines of inquiry for future research, but the Donkalnis discovery is a valuable reminder of the importance of detailed (re-)examination of any seemingly ordinary find, including small objects such as tooth pendants.

Funding statement

This research is funded by the Research Council of Lithuania (S-MIP-21-59 and S-PD-24-46), and the European Research Council (864358).

References

Butrimas, A. 2012. Donkalnio ir Spigino mezolito–neolito kapinynai. Seniausi laidojimo paminklai Lietuvoje. Vilnius: Vilniaus dailės akademijos leidykla.Google Scholar
Grünberg, J.M., Gramsch, B., Brinch Petersen, E., Płonka, T. & Meller, H.. (ed.) 2023. Mesolithic art – abstraction, decoration, messages (Tagungen des Landesmuseums für Vorgeschichte Halle 26). Halle (Saale): Landesmuseums für Vorgeschichte.Google Scholar
Jonuks, T. 2023. Mesolithic art in Estonia: figurative depictions and geometrical ornament, in Grünberg, J.M., Gramsch, B., Petersen, E. Brinch, Płonka, T. & Meller, H. (ed.) Mesolithic art – abstraction, decoration, messages (Tagungen des Landesmuseums für vorgeschichte Halle 26): 387405. Halle (Saale): Landesmuseums für Vorgeschichte.Google Scholar
Maca¯ne, A. 2022. Stone Age companions: humans and animals in hunter-gatherer burials in north-eastern Europe. (GOTARC, Series B 81). Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Mannermaa, K., Rainio, R., Girya, E.Y. & Gerasimov, D.V.. 2021. Let's groove: attachment techniques of Eurasian elk (Alces alces) tooth pendants at the Late Mesolithic cemetery Yuzhniy Oleniy Ostrov (Lake Onega, Russia). Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-020-01237-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oshibkina, S.V. 2016. Funeral rituals of the population of the eastern Lake Onega region (based on materials from Popovo and Peschanitsa cemeteries), in Grünberg, J.M., Gramsch, B., Larsson, L., Orschiedt, J. & Meller, H. (ed.) Mesolithic burials – rites, symbols and social organisation of early postglacial communities (Tagungen des Landesmuseums für vorgeschichte Halle 13): 793808. Halle (Saale): Landesmuseums für Vorgeschichte.Google Scholar
Osipowicz, G., Piličiauskienė, G., Piličiauskas, G. & Orłowska, J.. 2024. Animal tooth pendants from Spiginas and Donkalnis as instigators of a discussion on technological traditions, intergroup exchange and mobility in the early and middle Holocene in Central and northeastern Europe. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2024.104588Google Scholar
Płonka, T. 2003. The portable art of Mesolithic Europe. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.Google Scholar
Price, T.D. & Gebauer, A.B.. 2005. Smakkerup Huse. A late Mesolithic coastal site in northwest Zealand Denmark. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
Simčenka, E., Kozakaitė, J., Piličiauskienė, G., Gaižauskas, L. & Piličiauskas, G.. 2022. Human diet during the Stone Age and early metal period (7000–1 cal BC) in Lithuania: an update. Radiocarbon 64: 1171–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC.2022.41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vang Petersen, P. 2021. Zig-zag lines and other protective patterns in Palaeolithic and Mesolithic art. Quaternary International 573: 6674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2019.09.029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. A) location of Biržulis Lake; B) Biržulis Lake and Donkalnis burial ground (red square); C) aerial view of Donkalnis burial ground (red arrow) (figure by A. Butrimas & T. Rimkus).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Donkalnis Grave 5 (figure by A. Butrimas).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Engraved tooth pendant made from a Eurasian elk incisor and found in Grave 5, showing the labial (A), distal (B), mesial (C) and lingual (D) views (figure by T. Rimkus).

Figure 3

Figure 4. Illustrations of the labial (A), distal (B), mesial (C) and lingual (D) views of the engraved tooth pendant from Grave 5 (figure by M. Gintalas).

Figure 4

Figure 5. Microscopic examination of groove patterns on different surfaces of the pendant (1, distal; 2, mesial; 3, labial) (figure by T. Rimkus).