Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:54:09.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Skeletal health, redox balance and gastrointestinal functionality in dairy cows: connecting bugs and bones

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2020

Pietro Celi*
Affiliation:
DSM Nutritional Products, Animal Nutrition and Health, Wurmisweg 576, Kaiseraugst, Switzerland Melbourne School of Land and Environment, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic.3010, Australia
Maik Kindermann
Affiliation:
DSM Nutritional Products, Animal Nutrition and Health, Wurmisweg 576, Kaiseraugst, Switzerland
Luis F. M. Tamassia
Affiliation:
DSM Nutritional Products, Animal Nutrition and Health, Wurmisweg 576, Kaiseraugst, Switzerland
Nicola Walker
Affiliation:
DSM Nutritional Products, Animal Nutrition and Health, Wurmisweg 576, Kaiseraugst, Switzerland
*
Author for correspondence: Pietro Celi, Email: pietro.celi@dsm.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This research reflection examines the physiological links between redox balance, skeletal health and gastrointestinal functionality in dairy cows. With the increase in demand of animal products caused by the growth in human population, the dairy industry needs to develop and implement innovative strategies which are profitable, sustainable and cow friendly. Redox balance, skeletal heath and gastrointestinal functionality are three key physiological systems that are often seen as independent entities. In this research reflection we intend to stress that the antioxidant system, bone health and the microbiome are intimately intertwined. Antioxidants are crucial for the maintenance of redox homeostasis and optimal immune function. Optimal gastrointestinal functionality is important to maintain animal performance, health and welfare. In particular, the intestinal microbiome is increasingly seen as a driver of health and disease. Vitamin D metabolism is pivotal not only for optimal skeletal health, but in light of all the extra-skeletal effect of vitamin D, it is the foundation for optimal productive life. It makes sense to ask the question ‘how are redox balance and the microbiome involved in the modulation of bone health and immune function?’ In other words, are bugs and bones connected in dairy cows! The existing data available in the literature suggests that this might be the case. The characterization of the interactions between redox balance, skeletal health and the microbiome, will allow the development of a multisystem biological approach to refine nutritional interventions to improve dairy cattle health, welfare and productive longevity.

Type
Research Reflection
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hannah Dairy Research Foundation

With the current forecast for the world's population to reach close to 11 billion by 2100, it comes with no surprise that the demand for animal food products including dairy will increase. The implications for the dairy industry are numerous and far-reaching as it will have to develop and adopt strategies to increase productivity while maintaining cow health and welfare and safeguarding the environment. Notwithstanding the recent advances in dairy health and production, new developments in the dairy industry must encompass strategies that increase lifetime performance in order to meet the ever-growing demand for dairy products from the rapidly growing world population (McGrath et al., Reference McGrath, Duval, Tamassia, Kindermann, Stemmler, de Gouvea, Acedo, Immig, Williams and Celi2019). In the future, dairy farms will be bigger and highly modernized and for dairy farmers to feed the world's growing population within planetary boundaries, they will have to adopt technologies and husbandry practices that will provide improved cow lifetime performances, profitable dairy farms and sustainable agricultural practices (Britt et al., Reference Britt, Cushman, Dechow, Dobson, Humblot, Hutjens, Jones, Ruegg, Sheldon and Stevenson2018).

Dairy cows of the future will be more robust with improved health and longevity, driven principally by improvements in genomic selection schemes. Welfare of dairy cattle will continue to receive increased attention, and dairy farm facilities will be modified to improve welfare of animals (Britt et al., Reference Britt, Cushman, Dechow, Dobson, Humblot, Hutjens, Jones, Ruegg, Sheldon and Stevenson2018). Considering that nutritional interventions are arguably the easiest strategy that can be implemented at farm level (McGrath et al., Reference McGrath, Duval, Tamassia, Kindermann, Stemmler, de Gouvea, Acedo, Immig, Williams and Celi2019), the dairy industry has the responsibility to develop and implement alternative nutritional strategies which are good for its people (profitable), planet (sustainable) and for the cows (health and welfare). The maintenance of redox balance, skeletal heath and gastrointestinal functionality have been identified as key pillars around which veterinarians and nutritionist should develop interventions that would result in more resilient and healthy dairy cattle (Celi et al., Reference Celi, Cowieson, Fru-Nji, Steinert, Kluenter and Verlhac2017).

In this research reflection we intend to highlight the physiological links between the antioxidant system, vitamin D metabolism and the rumen microbiome. Antioxidants play a key role in the maintenance of redox homeostasis which is crucial for immune system, while bone metabolism and health are the foundation for optimal productive life. The role of the microbiome as driver of health and diseases has received significant attention by the scientific community, however there are very few studies investigating its role in the modulation of bone health and immune function. Our intent is to draw the reader's attention to the fact that biological systems, namely, redox balance, skeletal health and the microbiome, are connected. The characterization of the interactions between these systems will allow the development of targeted nutritional interventions that would enable the improvement of dairy cattle health, welfare and productive longevity.

Redox balance

When oxidant activity exceeds the neutralizing capacity of antioxidants it can result in oxidative stress which in ruminants has been associated with several diseases, including conditions that are relevant for animal production and welfare (Celi, Reference Celi, Mandelker and Vajdovich2011). An imbalance between pro-oxidants and antioxidants lead to oxidative stress, therefore the maintenance of redox balance is crucial for optimal ruminant health (Chauhan et al., Reference Chauhan, Celi, Leury, Clarke and Dunshea2014). The main pro-oxidants (reactive oxygen species, reactive nitrogen species) and antioxidants (endogenous and dietary) involved in the maintenance of redox balance in ruminants have been reviewed extensively (Miller et al., Reference Miller, Brzezinska-Slebodzinska and Madsen1993; Lykkesfeldt and Svendsen, Reference Lykkesfeldt and Svendsen2007; Celi, Reference Celi, Mandelker and Vajdovich2011; Chauhan et al., Reference Chauhan, Celi, Leury, Clarke and Dunshea2014; Sordillo and Mavangira, Reference Sordillo and Mavangira2014).

Redox balance plays a key role in the modulation of metabolism, immunity, reproduction, health and welfare. In dairy cattle, redox balance can be disrupted at any time, however, the time around calving (transition period) and the first few weeks of life (neonatal period) are characterized by a higher risk of oxidative stress and incidence of diseases (Ranade et al., Reference Ranade, Talukder, Muscatello and Celi2014; Abuelo et al., Reference Abuelo, Hernández, Benedito and Castillo2019). During these periods the requirement for nutrients and micronutrients, including antioxidants, is considerably increased (Pedernera et al., Reference Pedernera, Celi, García, Salvin, Barchia and Fulkerson2010), therefore, supplementing diets with micronutrients and antioxidants can prove to be useful in maintaining redox balance (Abuelo et al., Reference Abuelo, Hernández, Benedito and Castillo2015; Surai et al., Reference Surai, Kochish, Fisinin and Juniper2019).

A relationship between dairy calf growth rates and antioxidant status has been reported (McGrath, Reference McGrath2016) and it has been proposed that dietary antioxidants can maintain redox balance in young ruminants, reducing the risk of disease and mortality while maintaining productive performance. In light of the observed accelerated growth of dairy calves and its association with increased lifetime productivity of dairy cows (Soberon and Van Amburgh, Reference Soberon and Van Amburgh2013), the use of dietary antioxidants seems to be a valid practical option to increase lifetime performances of dairy cattle (McGrath, Reference McGrath2016).

Redox balance is also implicated in the modulation of reproductive physiology in light of its involvement in the regulation of events such as oocyte maturation, steroidogenesis, regulation of follicular fluid environment, folliculogenesis, corpus luteal function, luteolysis and embryonic mortality (Talukder et al., Reference Talukder, Kerrisk, Gabai and Celi2017). The fact that antioxidant supplementation can improve reproductive outcomes in dairy cattle does not come as a surprise. While it is clear that maintaining redox balance in dairy cattle is crucial to maximize fertility (Talukder et al., Reference Talukder, Kerrisk, Gabai and Celi2017) and health (Abuelo et al., Reference Abuelo, Hernández, Benedito and Castillo2019), a better understanding of the factors involved in the control of redox balance will allow the verification of their success and effectiveness (Chauhan et al., Reference Chauhan, Liu, Leury, Cottrell, Celi and Dunshea2016). More importantly, as antioxidants are routinely supplemented in dairy diets (Lean et al., Reference Lean, VanSaun and DeGaris2013), the question is how much of which formulation(s) of antioxidants should be used to maintain redox balance. There is practical evidence in the literature suggesting that the supplementation of ruminant diets with supra-nutritional levels of antioxidants such as vitamin E and selenium can not only sustain redox balance but also maintain crucial physiological functions like thermoregulation, feed intake, respiratory physiology, rectal temperature, acid-base balance, inflammation and gastrointestinal functionality (Chauhan et al., Reference Chauhan, Celi, Leury, Clarke and Dunshea2014; Celi and Gabai, Reference Celi and Gabai2015).

Skeletal health and redox balance

Skeletal health is another of the many physiological function regulated by redox balance as suggested by epidemiological evidence linking dietary antioxidant intake and bone health (Rao and Rao, Reference Rao, Rao and Flores2013). Redox balance seems to play a role in bone remodeling (Domazetovic et al., Reference Domazetovic, Marcucci, Iantomasi, Brandi and Vincenzini2017). A disruption in redox balance results in decreased bone formation as the result of reduced differentiation and survival of osteoblasts, and activation of osteoclasts resulting in bone reabsorption (Rao and Rao, Reference Rao, Rao and Flores2013). Moreover, antioxidant deficiency has been associated with reduction in bone formation ultimately resulting in osteoporosis (Domazetovic et al., Reference Domazetovic, Marcucci, Iantomasi, Brandi and Vincenzini2017). Antioxidant enzymes such as glutathione peroxidase and catalase are considered markers of antioxidants defence mechanisms against bone resorption and osteoporosis (Rao and Rao, Reference Rao, Rao and Flores2013). Recently, many dietary antioxidants have been reported to restore redox balance and skeletal health (Rao and Rao, Reference Rao, Rao and Flores2013). For example, antioxidants such as vitamin C contribute to the maintenance of skeletal health by suppressing osteoclast activity and promoting osteoblast differentiation. Although vitamin C can be synthesized in tissues by ruminants, it is important to emphasize that vitamin C is an important cofactor for collagen formation and synthesis of hydroxyproline and hydroxylysine, indicating that vitamin C interacts with other nutritional factors such as vitamin E, vitamin D and calcium in the control of skeletal health (Sahni et al., Reference Sahni, Mangano, McLean, Hannan and Kiel2015). Finally, dietary carotenoids have also been reported to play an important role for improving bone health (Sahni et al., Reference Sahni, Mangano, McLean, Hannan and Kiel2015).

Extraskeletal effects of vitamin D

The mechanisms of disrupted skeletal health in dairy cows impairing their ability to maintain effective bone and mineral homeostasis have been recently reviewed (McGrath et al., Reference McGrath, Savage and Godwin2015). The role of vitamin D and its metabolites in maintaining skeletal health and mineral homeostasis are very well established. However, the actions of vitamin D are not confined to the skeleton as vitamin D receptors (VDR) and vitamin D hydroxylases CYP24A1 and CYP27B1 are nearly ubiquitous, advocating for a variety of extraskeletal actions of the vitamin D endocrine system (Bikle, Reference Bikle2016; Bouillon et al., Reference Bouillon, Marcocci, Carmeliet, Bikle, White, Dawson-Hughes, Lips, Munns, Lazaretti-Castro, Giustina and Bilezikian2019). The potential for the bone to now be considered an endocrine organ firmly puts skeletal health of the modern day dairy cow at the forefront of science (McNeill and Anderson, Reference McNeill and Anderson2012; Lean et al., Reference Lean, DeGaris, Celi, McNeill, Rodney and Fraser2014).

In both swine and poultry, the use of vitamin D3 and 25-OH-D3 (25-hydroxycholecalciferol) has been shown to improve bone strength, calcification, immunity and muscle content, often resulting in less morbidity and mortality as well as greater productivity (Chou et al., Reference Chou, Chung and Yu2009; Sugiyama et al., Reference Sugiyama, Kusuhara, Chung, Yonekura, Azem and Hayakawa2013). The next frontier of bone health research in dairy cows should be the characterization of the extraskeletal effects, such as the effects on metabolism, reproduction, muscle biology, immunity, and gastrointestinal functionality.

There is substantial evidence from published and new data that supports the hypothesis that in dairy cattle the skeleton has a pivotal role during the homeorhetic adaptation to lactation and that this relationship may be influenced by nutrition. Indeed, recent studies have demonstrated a link between 25-OH-D3 and energy metabolism in dairy cows (Lean et al., Reference Lean, DeGaris, Celi, McNeill, Rodney and Fraser2014; Rodney et al., Reference Rodney, Martinez, Celi, Block, Thomson, Wijffels, Fraser, Santos and Lean2018). In dairy cows, a dramatic increase in energy and nutrient requirements can be observed during the transition period, exposing them to negative energy and nutrient balance. The metabolic adaptations to negative energy balance require interactions of metabolic fuels and its failure may occur in various tissues resulting in several metabolic diseases (Drackley, Reference Drackley1999). Despite the transition period being the most studied period of the productive life of a dairy cow, the long-term physiological implications on responses like mammary gland function and fertility require a thorough assessment. Essential physiological function such as calcium homeostasis, lipid metabolism, insulin secretion, tissue sensitivity to insulin and the integration of these processes with other functions like redox balance are not fully elucidated yet. It has been observed that nutritional interventions administered before calving can increase milk yield, improve fertility and reduce the risk of metabolic diseases (Lean et al., Reference Lean, DeGaris, Celi, McNeill, Rodney and Fraser2014). It is also worth noting that correlations between energy and bone metabolism have been observed in dairy cows providing evidence to support a homeorhetic role for calcium metabolism in dairy cattle (Lean et al., Reference Lean, DeGaris, Celi, McNeill, Rodney and Fraser2014; Martinez et al., Reference Martinez, Rodney, Block, Hernandez, Nelson, Lean and Santos2018b; Rodney et al., Reference Rodney, Celi, McGrath, Golder, Anderson, McNeill, Fraser and Lean2019). However, it is worth mentioning that vitamin D supplementation around the time of calving has not always succeeded in preventing hypocalcemia (Weiss et al., Reference Weiss, Azem, Steinberg and Reinhardt2015). Considering the complex mechanisms involved in the control of calcium homeostasis in dairy cattle (DeGaris and Lean, Reference DeGaris and Lean2008), further studies are required to evaluate the effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation to reduce hypocalcemia during early lactation. Although it has been reported that vitamin D has a high margin of safety when used at recommended levels (Celi et al., Reference Celi, Williams, Engstrom, McGrath and La Marta2018), excessive intakes of vitamin D can result in intoxication in ruminants and future studies need to evaluate the safety of vitamin D supplementation for long periods of time.

Considering that VDRs are expressed in numerous tissues of the reproductive tract (Dokoh et al., Reference Dokoh, Donaldson, Marion, Pike and Haussler1983; Stumpf et al., Reference Stumpf, Sar and O'Brien1987), reproductive physiology should also be considered in regard to skeletal health. It has been reported that vitamin D has a positive effect on reproductive physiology in cattle (Ward et al., Reference Ward, Marion, Campbell and Dunham1971; Panda et al., Reference Panda, Miao, Tremblay, Sirois, Farookhi, Hendy and Goltzman2001; Kemmis et al., Reference Kemmis, Salvador, Smith and Welsh2006). Indeed, it has been observed that dairy cattle reproductive performance improved after vitamin D supplementation (Ward et al., Reference Ward, Marion, Campbell and Dunham1971), and that calcitriol blood concentration is elevated during pregnancy (O'Brien et al., Reference O'Brien, Li, Cao, Kent, Young, Queenan, Pressman and Cooper2014). A recent study in transition dairy cows has reported that dietary 25-OH-D3 tended to improve pregnancy rate and reduced the days to pregnancy during the 305-d lactation (Martinez et al., Reference Martinez, Rodney, Block, Hernandez, Nelson, Lean and Santos2018a). The authors argue that metabolites of vitamin D such as 25-OH-D3 might have directly stimulated the VDRs in reproductive tissues (Lou et al., Reference Lou, Molnár, Peräkylä, Qiao, Kalueff, St-Arnaud, Carlberg and Tuohimaa2010), which might have resulted in positive effects on fertility. Another possibility is that the positive effect on reproductive function might have been indirect as cows fed 25-OH-D3 presented improved neutrophil function and reduced incidence of inflammatory diseases such as metritis, which are known to decrease fertility (Ribeiro et al., Reference Ribeiro, Gomes, Greco, Cerri, Vieira-Neto, Monteiro, Lima, Bisinotto, Thatcher and Santos2016). Therefore, the observed improved pregnancy rate might have been the consequence of the better health status induced by dietary 25-OH-D3 (Martinez et al., Reference Martinez, Rodney, Block, Hernandez, Nelson, Lean and Santos2018a).

Considering that VDR and 1-α-hydroxylase are expressed in muscle fibers and myoblasts, it is not surprising that vitamin D plays a direct regulatory role in muscle physiology. Indeed, vitamin D is involved in the regulation of myogenesis, cell proliferation, differentiation, regulation of protein synthesis and mitochondrial metabolism (Montenegro et al., Reference Montenegro, Cruzat, Carlessi and Newsholme2019). Lack of VDR disrupts muscle growth and development, as observed in VDR knockout mice which have smaller muscle fibers and aberrant myogenic regulatory factor expression (Dzik and Kaczor, Reference Dzik and Kaczor2019). Moreover, as the inflammatory processes reduce muscle protein accretion, decreasing the impact of the inflammatory response is a key strategy to sustain production performances. Considering that dairy beef cross cattle production is becoming a financially attractive opportunity for the dairy industry as it allows producers to produce calves that will yield better carcasses than purebred dairy breeds and thus attract higher prices, dietary supplementation of dairy cattle's diet with vitamin D, in light of its the well-known anti-inflammatory effects, represents a great opportunity for the dairy industry to increase profitability and sustainability. Indeed, dairy beef production generates around 33% of the greenhouse gases equivalents per unit weight of meat compared to traditional beef cattle production and thus 25-OH-D3 supplementation can increase meat yield and lower the carbon footprint of the dairy industry at the same time (Britt et al., Reference Britt, Cushman, Dechow, Dobson, Humblot, Hutjens, Jones, Ruegg, Sheldon and Stevenson2018).

It is well known that both the innate and acquired immune responses are modulated by ligand dependent VDR functions. Indeed, VDR and vitamin D metabolic enzymes can be found in all cells of the innate and adaptive arms of the immune system (Bouillon et al., Reference Bouillon, Marcocci, Carmeliet, Bikle, White, Dawson-Hughes, Lips, Munns, Lazaretti-Castro, Giustina and Bilezikian2019). In cattle, calcitriol augments the production of nitric oxide and β-defensin antimicrobial peptides (Merriman et al., Reference Merriman, Kweh, Powell, Lippolis and Nelson2015), molecules that are toxic to bacteria, indicating a potential for targeted enhancement of defence against bacterial infections via the vitamin D pathway (Nelson et al., Reference Nelson, Reinhardt, Lippolis, Sacco and Nonnecke2012). Macrophages are the main sources of the calcitriol that controls vitamin D-mediated immune responses. In bovine macrophages CYP27B1 is stimulated via toll-like receptor recognition of pathogen associated molecular patterns such as lipopolysaccharide, peptidoglycan, and mycobacterial lipopeptides. In macrophages, CYP27B1 facilitates the conversion of calcidiol to calcitriol, activating vitamin D-mediated immune responses (Nelson et al., Reference Nelson, Reinhardt, Thacker, Beitz and Lippolis2010). Interestingly, CYP27B1 is expressed in the udder during mastitis in dairy cattle (Nelson et al., Reference Nelson, Reinhardt, Thacker, Beitz and Lippolis2010). Although vitamin D treatments does not seem to prevent or cure mastitis, it reduced its negative impact on the cow (Lippolis et al., Reference Lippolis, Reinhardt, Sacco, Nonnecke and Nelson2011). It has been reported that dietary 25-OH-D3 decreased the incidence of retained placenta and metritis and the percentage of cows with multiple diseases during the first 30 d in milk, which are likely related to the improved measures of immune function evaluated in neutrophils (Martinez et al., Reference Martinez, Rodney, Block, Hernandez, Nelson, Lean and Santos2018a). While it is clear that vitamin D can modulate the immune system in dairy cattle, we still need clarity of understanding of the immunomodulatory effects of dietary 25-OH-D3 as this will allow the development of nutritional strategies to increase the resilience of dairy cattle to bacterial infection. These strategies have the potential to reduce the use of antibiotics in the dairy industry and thus might contribute to the decrease in antimicrobial resistance.

VDR and vitamin D metabolic enzymes have been localized in virtually all cells of both the innate and adaptive immune system. Moreover, there is now consensus that cells of the immune system produce 1,25(OH)2D3 locally and that expression of CYP27B1 in the immune system is regulated independently of that in the endocrine system that controls calcium homeostasis (Nelson et al., Reference Nelson, Reinhardt, Lippolis, Sacco and Nonnecke2012). For example, there is evidence that in activated immune cells VDR controls several immune responses (Hewison, Reference Hewison and Gerald2011). It has been observed that in cattle, 1,25(OH)2D3 increases the production of antimicrobial peptides such as nitric oxide and β-defensin, (Nelson et al., Reference Nelson, Reinhardt, Lippolis, Sacco and Nonnecke2012). Considering that vitamin D metabolism might be quite different in each system (skeletal, immune, digestive, etc.), it is reasonable to argue that the vitamin D requirements for each of these systems may also differ (Nelson et al., Reference Nelson, Lippolis, Reinhardt, Sacco, Powell, Drewnoski, O'Neil, Beitz and Weiss2016). Nevertheless, the optimal 25(OH)D3 concentration for the dairy cattle immune system has not been established thus far. In vitro studies investigating the effect of different 25(OH)D3 concentrations on macrophage host defence responses suggest that 100 ng/ml should be an effective level (Nelson et al., Reference Nelson, Reinhardt, Thacker, Beitz and Lippolis2010). However, despite the association between vitamin D deficiency and risk of respiratory infections, calves with a serum 25(OH)D3 concentration of about 175 ng/ml and experimentally challenged with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), did not perform better than calves with serum 25(OH)D3 concentration of about 30 ng/ml in regard to severity the infection (Sacco et al., Reference Sacco, Nonnecke, Palmer, Waters, Lippolis and Reinhardt2012). As reported above, however, there is evidence for dietary 25(OH)D3 to reduce the incidence of some peripartum diseases in dairy cattle (Martinez et al., Reference Martinez, Rodney, Block, Hernandez, Nelson, Lean and Santos2018a); this apparent discrepancy needs to be addressed with further work investigating the relationship between serum 25(OH)D3 and infectious disease outcome in dairy cattle.

Vitamin D deficiency has been linked to disrupted gastrointestinal functionality (Christakos, Reference Christakos2012; De Santis et al., Reference De Santis, Cavalcanti, Mastronardi, Jirillo and Chieppa2015), and although vitamin deficiencies do not seem to occur in modern dairy production systems, it should be noted that vitamin requirements of the modern dairy cow may be higher than those currently recommended by the NRC. The current understanding of gastrointestinal functionality encompasses not only the gastro-intestinal (GI) microbiota including pathogens causing diseases, mortality and morbidity in dairy cattle, but also other key components such as diet, effective structure of the gastrointestinal barrier, host interaction with the GI microbiota, effective digestion and absorption of feed and effective maturation and development of innate and acquired immune functions (Celi et al., Reference Celi, Cowieson, Fru-Nji, Steinert, Kluenter and Verlhac2017). This novel definition of gut health focuses on the functionality of the whole GI system and on the complex interactions between all its components mentioned above. With this definition in mind, it is not surprising that skeletal health is also influenced by the GI microbiota and vice versa. Indeed, it has been reported that vitamin D influences the composition of the microbiota (Sun, Reference Sun2018; Waterhouse et al., Reference Waterhouse, Hope, Krause, Morrison, Protani, Zakrzewski and Neale2019), and that the gut microbiota regulates endocrine vitamin D metabolism (Bora et al., Reference Bora, Kennett, Smith, Patterson and Cantorna2018). Vitamin D regulates the expression of tight junction proteins in the intestinal epithelial cells, thereby maintaining optimal intestinal barrier function (De Santis et al., Reference De Santis, Cavalcanti, Mastronardi, Jirillo and Chieppa2015). In the intestinal mucosa, vitamin D, together with vitamin A, supports innate lymphoid cells that produce IL-22, suppressed IFN-γ and IL-17 by T cells, and induces regulatory T cells (Cantorna et al., Reference Cantorna, Snyder and Arora2019). Vitamin D seems to shape the gut microbiota by modulating the intestinal epithelium and mucosal immune system and thus maintaining intestinal homeostasis (Cantorna et al., Reference Cantorna, Snyder and Arora2019). On the other end, the intestinal microbiota may regulate bone metabolism by influencing the relative activities of osteoclasts and osteoblasts through effects on the immune system and host metabolic pathways, as well as through the production of metabolites (Charles et al., Reference Charles, Ermann and Aliprantis2015). It has been proposed that during eubiosis (balance between the gut microbiome and their host), there is a balance between the anti-osteoclastogenic and pro-osteoclastogenic pathways, however, during dysbiosis (disturbance in the balance between the gut microbiome and the host), the gut microbiome may promote osteoclast-mediated bone loss as a result of the increase in inflammatory cytokines which recruit more osteoclast precursors, promote osteoclast activity and reduce anti-osteoclast T cells (Charles et al., Reference Charles, Ermann and Aliprantis2015). Several cytokines are involved in skeletal health and proinflammatory cytokines are believed to have osteoclastogenic effects (Jonsson et al., Reference Jonsson, Fortes, Piper, Vankan, de Cisneros and Wittek2013). For example, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and IL-1 have been shown to modulate the expression of receptor activator of nuclear factor κ-B (RANK), its ligand (RANKL), and osteoprotegerin (Jonsson et al., Reference Jonsson, Fortes, Piper, Vankan, de Cisneros and Wittek2013). Osteoclastogenesis is the differentiation of osteoclast into multinucleated cells which leads to bone degradation and calcium mobilization. Osteoclastogenesis is initiated by the binding of RANKL to its receptor on osteoclasts. Osteoprotegerin on the other hand, inhibits osteoclastogenesis by acting as a decoy receptor for RANKL (Hatate et al., Reference Hatate, Kawashima, Kayano, Hanada and Yamagishi2020). Changes in cytokine production in tissues and blood seems also to modulate calcium homeostasis during the parturient period, with potential implications for the incidence of peripartum hypocalcemia (Gray et al., Reference Gray, St George and Jonsson2007). While specific studies in this area are lacking in dairy cattle, the literature clearly highlights the biological links between redox balance, skeletal health and gastrointestinal functionality.

In conclusion, future dairy production and its sustainability depends on the development a larger understanding and practical application of concepts related to gastrointestinal functionality that imply complete holistic management of the production system. Nutritional strategies can reduce the incidence of health and welfare issues, but they need to be strategically integrated with management practices and breeding programs. The success of these strategies, however, is often hindered by the complexity of the interactions between cows and their environment. In dairy cattle, effective gastrointestinal functionality is vital in determining health, welfare and productive performance. Optimization of gastrointestinal functionality is crucial to increase nutrient digestibility and thus maximizing value from feed, to sustain host physiological functions such as innate and adaptive immunity and thus increasing resilience to environmental challenges, and finally, to maintain eubiotic conditions. The characterization of the interactions between the antioxidant system, vitamin D metabolism and the rumen microbiome will allow the development of strategic nutritional interventions aimed at improving skeletal health, redox balance and gastrointestinal functionality that would enable achieving optimal lifetime performance.

References

Abuelo, A, Hernández, J, Benedito, JL and Castillo, C (2015) The importance of the oxidative status of dairy cattle in the periparturient period: revisiting antioxidant supplementation. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 99, 10031016.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abuelo, A, Hernández, J, Benedito, JL and Castillo, C (2019) Redox biology in transition periods of dairy cattle: role in the health of periparturient and neonatal animals. Antioxidants 8, 20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bikle, DD (2016) Extraskeletal actions of vitamin D. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 1376, 2952.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bora, SA, Kennett, MJ, Smith, PB, Patterson, AD and Cantorna, MT (2018) The gut microbiota regulates endocrine vitamin D metabolism through fibroblast growth factor 23. Frontiers in Immunology 9, 408408.10.3389/fimmu.2018.00408CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bouillon, R, Marcocci, C, Carmeliet, G, Bikle, D, White, JH, Dawson-Hughes, B, Lips, P, Munns, CF, Lazaretti-Castro, M, Giustina, A and Bilezikian, J (2019) Skeletal and extraskeletal actions of vitamin D: current evidence and outstanding questions. Endocrine Reviews 40, 11091151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Britt, JH, Cushman, RA, Dechow, CD, Dobson, H, Humblot, P, Hutjens, MF, Jones, GA, Ruegg, PS, Sheldon, IM and Stevenson, JS (2018) Invited review: learning from the future – a vision for dairy farms and cows in 2067. Journal of Dairy Science 101, 37223741.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cantorna, MT, Snyder, L and Arora, J (2019) Vitamin A and vitamin D regulate the microbial complexity, barrier function, and the mucosal immune responses to ensure intestinal homeostasis. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 54, 184192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Celi, P (2011) Oxidative stress in ruminants. In Mandelker, L and Vajdovich, P (eds), Studies on Veterinary Medicine. Oxidative Stress in Applied Basic Research and Clinical Practice, vol. 5. New York: Humana Press, pp. 191231.Google Scholar
Celi, P and Gabai, G (2015) Oxidant/antioxidant balance in animal nutrition and health: the role of protein oxidation. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 2, 48.10.3389/fvets.2015.00048CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Celi, P, Cowieson, AJ, Fru-Nji, F, Steinert, RE, Kluenter, AM and Verlhac, V (2017) Gastrointestinal functionality in animal nutrition and health: new opportunities for sustainable animal production. Animal Feed Science and Technology 234, 88100.10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.09.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celi, P, Williams, S, Engstrom, M, McGrath, J and La Marta, J (2018) Safety evaluation of dietary levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 in growing calves. Food and Chemical Toxicology 111, 641649.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charles, JF, Ermann, J and Aliprantis, AO (2015) The intestinal microbiome and skeletal fitness: connecting bugs and bones. Clinical Immunology 159, 163169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chauhan, SS, Celi, P, Leury, BJ, Clarke, IJ and Dunshea, FR (2014) Dietary antioxidants at supranutritional doses improve oxidative status and reduce the negative effects of heat stress in sheep. Journal of Animal Science 92, 33643374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauhan, SS, Liu, F, Leury, BJ, Cottrell, JJ, Celi, P and Dunshea, FR (2016) Functionality and genomics of selenium and vitamin E supplementation in ruminants. Animal Production Science 56, 12851298.10.1071/AN15263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chou, SH, Chung, TK and Yu, B (2009) Effects of supplemental 25-hydroxycholecalciferol on growth performance, small intestinal morphology, and immune response of broiler chickens. Poultry Science 88, 23332341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christakos, S (2012) Vitamin D deficiency: protective against enteric infection? American Journal of Physiology: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology 303, G1297G1298.Google ScholarPubMed
DeGaris, PJ and Lean, IJ (2008) Milk fever in dairy cows: a review of pathophysiology and control principles. The Veterinary Journal 176, 5869.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Santis, S, Cavalcanti, E, Mastronardi, M, Jirillo, E and Chieppa, M (2015) Nutritional keys for intestinal barrier modulation. Frontiers in Immunology 6, 612612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dokoh, S, Donaldson, CA, Marion, SL, Pike, JW and Haussler, MR (1983) The ovary: a target organ for 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Endocrinology 112, 200206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Domazetovic, V, Marcucci, G, Iantomasi, T, Brandi, ML and Vincenzini, MT (2017) Oxidative stress in bone remodeling: role of antioxidants. Clinical Cases in Mineral and Bone Metabolism 14, 209216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drackley, JK (1999) Biology of dairy cows during the transition period: the final frontier. Journal of Dairy Science 82, 22592273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dzik, KP and Kaczor, JJ (2019) Mechanisms of vitamin D on skeletal muscle function: oxidative stress, energy metabolism and anabolic state. European Journal of Applied Physiology 119, 825839.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, CP, St George, TD and Jonsson, NN (2007) Milk fever in dairy cattle: a novel hypothesis for an immune mediated aetiology. Cattle Practice 15, 277282.Google Scholar
Hatate, K, Kawashima, C, Kayano, M, Hanada, M and Yamagishi, N (2020) Blood markers of osteoclastic differentiation in periparturient dairy cows at different parities, with and without milk fever. Research in Veterinary Science 131, 301305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hewison, M (2011) Vitamin D and innate and adaptive immunity. In Gerald, L (ed.), Vitamins & Hormones, vol. 86, London, UK: Academic Press, pp. 2362.Google Scholar
Jonsson, NN, Fortes, MRS, Piper, EK, Vankan, DM, de Cisneros, JPJ and Wittek, T (2013) Comparison of metabolic, hematological, and peripheral blood leukocyte cytokine profiles of dairy cows and heifers during the periparturient period. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 22832292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kemmis, CM, Salvador, SM, Smith, KM and Welsh, J (2006) Human mammary epithelial cells express CYP27B1 and are growth inhibited by 25-Hydroxyvitamin D-3, the major circulating form of vitamin D-3. Journal of Nutrition 136, 887892.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lean, IJ, VanSaun, R and DeGaris, PJ (2013) Mineral and antioxidant management of transition dairy cows. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 29, 367386.Google ScholarPubMed
Lean, IJ, DeGaris, PJ, Celi, P, McNeill, DM, Rodney, RM and Fraser, DR (2014) Influencing the future: interactions of skeleton, energy, protein and calcium during late gestation and early lactation. Animal Production Science 54, 11771189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippolis, JD, Reinhardt, TA, Sacco, RA, Nonnecke, BJ and Nelson, CD (2011) Treatment of an intramammary bacterial infection with 25-hydroxyvitamin D(3). PLoS ONE 6, e25479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lou, YR, Molnár, F, Peräkylä, M, Qiao, S, Kalueff, AV, St-Arnaud, R, Carlberg, C and Tuohimaa, P (2010) 25-Hydroxyvitamin D(3) is an agonistic vitamin D receptor ligand. The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 118, 162–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lykkesfeldt, J and Svendsen, O (2007) Oxidants and antioxidants in disease: oxidative stress in farm animals. The Veterinary Journal 173, 502511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martinez, N, Rodney, RM, Block, E, Hernandez, LL, Nelson, CD, Lean, IJ and Santos, JEP (2018 a) Effects of prepartum dietary cation-anion difference and source of vitamin D in dairy cows: health and reproductive responses. Journal of Dairy Science 101, 25632578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martinez, N, Rodney, RM, Block, E, Hernandez, LL, Nelson, CD, Lean, IJ and Santos, JEP (2018 b) Effects of prepartum dietary cation-anion difference and source of vitamin D in dairy cows: lactation performance and energy metabolism. Journal of Dairy Science 101, 25442562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGrath, JJ (2016) Accelerated pre-weaning growth rates in dairy calves: do antioxidants have a place? Animal Production Science 56, 12751284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrath, JJ, Savage, DB and Godwin, IR (2015) The role and potential advantages of vitamin D metabolites in maintaining calcium status in high-producing dairy herds. Animal Production Science 55, 10811089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrath, J, Duval, SM, Tamassia, LFM, Kindermann, M, Stemmler, RT, de Gouvea, VN, Acedo, TS, Immig, I, Williams, SN and Celi, P (2019) Nutritional strategies in ruminants: a lifetime approach. Research in Veterinary Science 116, 2839.10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.09.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D and Anderson, S (2012) Year Bone as an endocrine organ and the mineral nutrition of the dairy cow. Proceedings of the International Conference on Livestock Production and Veterinary Technology, pp. 220225.Google Scholar
Merriman, KE, Kweh, MF, Powell, JL, Lippolis, JD and Nelson, CD (2015) Multiple beta-defensin genes are upregulated by the vitamin D pathway in cattle. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 154, 120129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, JK, Brzezinska-Slebodzinska, E and Madsen, FC (1993) Oxidative stress, antioxidants, and animal function. Journal of Dairy Science 76, 28122823.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77620-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montenegro, KR, Cruzat, V, Carlessi, R and Newsholme, P (2019) Mechanisms of vitamin D action in skeletal muscle. Nutrition Research Reviews 32, 113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, CD, Reinhardt, TA, Thacker, TC, Beitz, DC and Lippolis, JD (2010) Modulation of the bovine innate immune response by production of 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) in bovine monocytes. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 10411049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, CD, Reinhardt, TA, Lippolis, JD, Sacco, RE and Nonnecke, BJ (2012) Vitamin D signaling in the bovine immune system: a model for understanding human vitamin D requirements. Nutrients 4, 181196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, CD, Lippolis, JD, Reinhardt, TA, Sacco, RE, Powell, JL, Drewnoski, ME, O'Neil, M, Beitz, DC and Weiss, WP (2016) Vitamin D status of dairy cattle: outcomes of current practices in the dairy industry. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 1015010160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Brien, KO, Li, S, Cao, C, Kent, T, Young, BV, Queenan, RA, Pressman, EK and Cooper, EM (2014) Placental CYP27B1 and CYP24A1 expression in human placental tissue and their association with maternal and neonatal calcitropic hormones. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 99, 13481356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Panda, DK, Miao, D, Tremblay, ML, Sirois, J, Farookhi, R, Hendy, GN and Goltzman, D (2001) Targeted ablation of the 25-hydroxyvitamin D 1alpha-hydroxylase enzyme: evidence for skeletal, reproductive, and immune dysfunction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98, 74987503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pedernera, M, Celi, P, García, SC, Salvin, HE, Barchia, I and Fulkerson, WJ (2010) Effect of diet, energy balance and milk production on oxidative stress in early-lactating dairy cows grazing pasture. The Veterinary Journal 186, 352357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ranade, R, Talukder, S, Muscatello, G and Celi, P (2014) Assessment of oxidative stress biomarkers in exhaled breath condensate and blood of dairy heifer calves from birth to weaning. The Veterinary Journal 202, 583587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rao, LG and Rao, AV (2013) Oxidative stress and antioxidants in the risk of osteoporosis – role of the antioxidants lycopene and polyphenols. In Flores, MV (ed.), Topics in Osteoporosis, Croatia, pp. 117161.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, ES, Gomes, G, Greco, LF, Cerri, RLA, Vieira-Neto, A, Monteiro, PLJ Jr, Lima, FS, Bisinotto, RS, Thatcher, WW and Santos, JEP (2016) Carryover effect of postpartum inflammatory diseases on developmental biology and fertility in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 22012220.10.3168/jds.2015-10337CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodney, RM, Martinez, NP, Celi, P, Block, E, Thomson, PC, Wijffels, G, Fraser, DR, Santos, JEP and Lean, IJ (2018) Associations between bone and energy metabolism in cows fed diets differing in level of dietary cation-anion difference and supplemented with cholecalciferol or calcidiol. Journal of Dairy Science 101, 65816601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodney, RM, Celi, P, McGrath, JJ, Golder, HM, Anderson, ST, McNeill, DM, Fraser, DR and Lean, IJ (2019) Metabolic and production responses to calcidiol treatment in mid-lactation dairy cows. Animal Production Science 59, 449460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacco, RE, Nonnecke, BJ, Palmer, MV, Waters, WR, Lippolis, JD and Reinhardt, TA (2012) Differential expression of cytokines in response to respiratory syncytial virus infection of calves with high or low circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D3. PLoS ONE 7, e33074e33074.10.1371/journal.pone.0033074CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sahni, S, Mangano, KM, McLean, RR, Hannan, MT and Kiel, DP (2015) Dietary approaches for bone health: lessons from the Framingham osteoporosis study. Current Osteoporosis Reports 13, 245255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soberon, F and Van Amburgh, ME (2013) Lactation biology symposium: the effect of nutrient intake from milk or milk replacer of preweaned dairy calves on lactation milk yield as adults: a meta-analysis of current data. Journal of Animal Science 91, 706712.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sordillo, LM and Mavangira, V (2014) The nexus between nutrient metabolism, oxidative stress and inflammation in transition cows. Animal Production Science 54, 12041214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stumpf, WE, Sar, M and O'Brien, LP (1987) Vitamin D sites of action in the pituitary studied by combined autoradiography-immunohistochemistry. Histochemistry 88, 1116.10.1007/BF00490160CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sugiyama, T, Kusuhara, S, Chung, TK, Yonekura, H, Azem, E and Hayakawa, T (2013) Effects of 25-hydroxy-cholecalciferol on the development of osteochondrosis in swine. Animal Science Journal 84, 341349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, J (2018) Dietary vitamin D, vitamin D receptor, and microbiome. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism Care 21, 471474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Surai, PF, Kochish, II, Fisinin, VI and Juniper, DT (2019) Revisiting oxidative stress and the use of organic selenium in dairy cow nutrition. Animals 9, 462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Talukder, S, Kerrisk, KL, Gabai, G and Celi, P (2017) Role of oxidant–antioxidant balance in reproduction of domestic animals. Animal Production Science 57, 15881597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, G, Marion, GB, Campbell, CW and Dunham, JR (1971) Influences of calcium intake and vitamin D supplementation on reproductive performance of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 54, 204206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waterhouse, M, Hope, B, Krause, L, Morrison, M, Protani, MM, Zakrzewski, M and Neale, RE (2019) Vitamin D and the gut microbiome: a systematic review of in vivo studies. European Journal of Nutrition 58, 28952910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiss, WP, Azem, E, Steinberg, W and Reinhardt, TA (2015) Effect of feeding 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 with a negative cation-anion difference diet on calcium and vitamin D status of periparturient cows and their calves. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 55885600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed