Hostname: page-component-669899f699-swprf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T07:11:36.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Social interactions and household fuel choice: evidence from rural China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2024

Hang Fang
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, Anhui, China Green Food Industry Chain in Philosophy and Social Science of Anhui Key Lab, Hefei, Anhui, China
Xuechen Jiang
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, Anhui, China
Qianheng Chen
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
Michael S. Delgado*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
*
*Corresponding author: Michael S. Delgado; Email: delgado2@purdue.edu

Abstract

We study household fuel choice in rural China through the lens of social interactions, deploying a structural discrete choice interaction model to explain peer-dependence in household fuel choice. The data comes from the China Family Panel Studies 2010–2020, and we use multiple strategies to examine the robustness of the social interaction effects. We find a significant endogenous social effect, meaning that whether a household chooses non-solid clean fuel for cooking is directly affected by the choice in cooking fuel made by its neighbors in the village. Households with lower non-farm income are more sensitive to the choices of others, and the fuel choices of households with a higher education and/or a higher income attracts more attention from others. Modern communication technologies facilitate information exchange among rural residents, thereby strengthening the endogenous social effect. We suggest that public policies can accelerate rural energy transition by stimulating positive social spillovers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alem, Y, Beyene, AD, Köhlin, G and Mekonnen, A (2016) Modelling household cooking fuel choice: a panel multinomial logit approach. Energy Economics 59, 129137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Araujo, C, Combes, J-L and Féres, JG (2019) Determinants of Amazon deforestation: the role of off-farm income. Environment and Development Economics 24, 138156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baiyegunhi, LJS and Hassan, MB (2014) Rural household fuel energy transition: evidence from Giwa LGA Kaduna State, Nigeria. Energy for Sustainable Development 20, 3035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G and Murphy, K (2000) Social Economics: Market Behavior in a Social Environment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Blume, LE, Brock, WA, Durlauf, SN and Jayaraman, R (2015) Linear social interactions models. Journal of Political Economy 9, 444496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brock, WA and Durlauf, SN (2001) Discrete choice with social interactions. Review of Economic Studies 68, 235260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryan, B, Burkhardt, J and Gillingham, KT (2020) Peer effects in residential water conservation: evidence from migration. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 12, 107133.Google Scholar
Busic-Sontic, A and Fuerst, F (2018) Does your personality shape your reaction to your neighbours’ behaviour? A spatial study of the diffusion of solar panels. Energy & Buildings 158, 12751285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Q and Chi, G (2014) Social comparisons, inclusion and happiness: evidence from rural China. Economics Review 4, 316 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Chen, Q, Yang, H, Liu, T and Zhang, L (2016) Household biomass energy choice and its policy implications on improving rural livelihoods in Sichuan, China. Energy Policy 93, 291302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Giorgi, G, Frederiksen, A and Pistaferri, L (2020) Consumption network effects. Review of Economic Studies 87, 130163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Démurger, S and Fournier, M (2011) Poverty and firewood consumption: a case study of rural households in northern China. China Economic Review 22, 512523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dendup, N and Arimura, T (2019) Information leverage: the adoption of clean cooking fuel in Bhutan. Energy Policy 125, 181195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durlauf, SN and Ioannides, YM (2010) Social interactions. Annual Review of Economics 2, 451478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ESMAP (2018) Regulatory indicators for sustainable energy. Energy Sector Management Assistance Program Report, Washington, DC, World Bank.Google Scholar
Fang, H, Chen, Q, Delgado, M and He, Q (2023) Peer correlations in income: evidence from a Guanxi network in rural China. Economics Letters 222, 110959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fei, X (1993) From the Soil: The Foundation of Chinese Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gu, J (2022) Importance of neighbors in rural households’ conversion to cleaner cooking fuels: the impact and mechanisms of peer effects. Journal of Cleaner Production 379, 134776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, J, Xu, Y, Qu, Y, Wang, Y and Wu, X (2023) Exploring factors affecting household energy consumption in the internet era: empirical evidence from Chinese households. Energy Policy 183, 113810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, H, Wu, S and Zang, Z (2018) Factors underlying rural household energy transition: a case study of China. Energy Policy 114, 234244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heltberg, R (2005) Factors determining household fuel choice in Guatemala. Environment and Development Economics 10, 337361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hou, B, Wu, J, Mi, Z, Ma, C, Shi, X and Liao, H (2022) Cooking fuel types and the health effects: a field study in China. Energy Policy 167, 113012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IEA (2017) Energy Access Outlook. Paris: IEA/OECD.Google Scholar
Knight, J, Song, L and Gunatilaka, R (2009) Subjective well-being and its determinants in rural China. China Economic Review 20, 635649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lelieveld, J, Evans, J, Fnais, M, Giannadaki, D and Pozzwe, A (2015) The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale. Nature 525, 367371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, H, Li, Y, Zheng, G and Zhou, Y (2024) Interaction between household energy consumption and health: a systematic review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 189, 113859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Z, Li, J, Rommel, J and Feng, S (2020) Health impacts of cooking fuel choice in rural China. Energy Economics 89, 104811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ma, W, Zhou, X and Renwick, A (2019) Impact of off-farm income on household energy expenditures in China: implications for rural energy transition. Energy Policy 127, 248258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manski, CF (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects: the reflection problem. Review of Economic Studies 60, 531542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miah, MD, Alrashid, H and Shin, MY (2009) Wood fuel use in the traditional cooking stoves in the rural floodplain areas of Bangladesh: a socio-environmental perspective. Biomass and Bioenergy 33, 7078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffitt, RA (2001) Policy interventions, low-level equilibria and social interactions. In Durlauf, SN and Young, HP (eds), Social Dynamics. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 4582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, C and Yan, H (2018) Household fuel use in developing countries: review of theory and evidence. Energy Economics 70, 429439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, DMA, Berazneva, J and Lee, DR (2018) Fuelwood source substitution, gender, and shadow prices in western Kenya. Environment and Development Economics 23, 655678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pandey, VL and Chaubal, A (2011) Comprehending household cooking energy choice in rural India. Biomass and Bioenergy 35, 47244731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratiti, R, Vadala, D, Kalynych, Z and Sud, P (2020) Health effects of household air pollution related to biomass cook stoves in resource limited countries and its mitigation by improved cookstoves. Environmental Research 186, 109574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qing, C, He, J, Guo, S, Zhou, W, Deng, X and Xu, D (2022) Peer effects on the adoption of biogas in rural households of Sichuan Province, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29, 6148861501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roychowdhury, P (2019) Peer effects in consumption in India: an instrumental variables approach using negative idiosyncratic shocks. World Development 114, 122137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, G and Perry, E (2018) Peer effects in the diffusion of water-saving agricultural technologies. Agricultural Economics 50, 693706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, C, Bilsborrow, RE, Jagger, P, Zhang, Q, Chen, X and Huang, Q (2018) Rural household energy use and its determinants in China: how important are influences of payment for ecosystem services vs. other factors? Ecological Economics 145, 148159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srinivasan, S and Carattini, S (2020) Adding fuel to fire? Social spillovers in the adoption of LPG in India. Ecological Economics 167, 106398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Q and Zhang, X (2017) Three rights separation: China's proposed rural land rights reform and four types of local trials. Land Use Policy 64, 111121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wassie, YT, Rannestad, MM and Adaramola, MS (2021) Determinants of household energy choices in rural sub-Saharan Africa: an example from southern Ethiopia. Energy 221, 119785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wen, H, Wang, C and Nie, P (2021) Acceleration of rural households’ conversion to cleaner cooking fuels: the importance and mechanisms of peer effects. Energy Policy, 154, 112301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wuepper, D, Sauer, J and Kleemann, L (2018) Sustainable intensification amongst Ghana's pineapple farmers: the complexity of an innovation determines the effectiveness of its training. Environment and Development Economics 23, 98119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xie, Y (2012) The User's Guide of the China Family Panel Studies. Beijing: Institute of Social Science Survey, Peking University.Google Scholar
Yadav, P, Davies, PJ and Asumadu-Sarkodie, S (2021) Fuel choice and tradition: why fuel stacking and the energy ladder are out of step? Solar Energy 214, 491501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, G (2004) The Psychology and Behavior of Chinese People: Localization Research. Beijing: China Renmin University Press (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Yang, A and Wang, Y (2023) Transition of household cooking energy in China since the 1980s. Energy 270, 126925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, X, Li, J, Xu, J and Yi, Y (2020) Household fuelwood consumption in western rural China: ethnic minority families versus Han Chinese families. Environment and Development Economics 25, 433458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, X and Hassen, S (2017) Household fuel choice in urban China: evidence from panel data. Environment and Development Economics 4, 122.Google Scholar
Zheng, R, Qiu, M, Wang, Y, Zhang, D, Wang, Z and Cheng, Y (2023) Identifying the influencing factors and constructing incentive pattern of residents’ waste classification behavior using PCA-1ogistic regression. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 30, 1714917165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhu, M, Huang, Y and Wei, C (2022) Role of peer effects in China's energy transition: evidence from rural Beijing. Environmental Science & Technology 56, 1609416103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zou, B and Luo, B (2019) Rural household energy consumption characteristics and determinants in China. Energy 182, 814823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Fang et al. supplementary material

Fang et al. supplementary material
Download Fang et al. supplementary material(File)
File 290.6 KB