No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
A systemwide approach to validation of electronic device denominator data
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 October 2022
Abstract
A multidisciplinary team collaborated to develop and validate a process to electronically capture patient and device denominator data at 6 hospitals in the same healthcare system. Validation was completed within 4–16 months. Manual count errors were identified as the main driver of electronic versus manual discrepancies.
- Type
- Concise Communication
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America
Footnotes
(Present affiliation: Infection Prevention and Control Services, Trinity Health St. Joseph Mercy, Ann Arbor, Michigan [K.M.]).
PREVIOUS PRESENTATION: These data were presented in part in abstract 2401at the Association of Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology 2019 Annual Conference on June 13, 2019, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
References
National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) patient safety component manual. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/pcsmanual_current.pdf. Published January 2021. Accessed October 4, 2021.Google Scholar
Instructions for completion of denominators for intensive care unit (ICU)/other locations (not NICU or SCA) (CDC 57.118). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/forms/instr/57_118.pdf. Published January 2021. Accessed October 4, 2021.Google Scholar
Instructions for completion of denominators for specialty care area (SCA)/Oncology (ONC) (CDC 57.117). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/forms/instr/57_117.pdf. Published January 2021. Accessed October 4, 2021.Google Scholar
Instructions for completion of denominators for neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) (CDC 57.116). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/forms/instr/57_116.pdf. Published January 2021. Accessed October 4, 2021.Google Scholar
Wright, MO, Fisher, A, John, M, Reynolds, K, Peterson, LR, Robicsek, A. The electronic medical record as a tool for infection surveillance: successful automation of device days. Am J Infect Control 2009;37:364–370.10.1016/j.ajic.2008.11.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NHSN guidance for missing device-associated denominator data. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/PDFs/NHSNMissingDenomData_Sep2013.pdf. Published September 2013. Accessed October 4, 2021.Google Scholar
Tejedor, SC, Garrett, G, Jacob, JT, et al. Electronic documentation of central venous catheter–days: validation is essential. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34:900–907.10.1017/S0195941700033695CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Backman, LA, Nobert, G, Melchreit, R, Fekieta, R, Dembry, LM. Validation of the surveillance and reporting of central-line–associated bloodstream infection denominator data. Am J Infect Control 2014;42:28–33.10.1016/j.ajic.2013.06.014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snyders, R, Babcock, H. Validating electronically collected denominator data: getting to the elusive ±5%. Am J Infect Control 2016;44:S55.10.1016/j.ajic.2016.04.055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyce, JM, Paci, J, Feidner, C, Hubbard, L. Prospective validation of central-line days derived from an electronic medical record system. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;36:1098–1099.10.1017/ice.2015.137CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metzger et al. supplementary material
Metzger et al. supplementary material 1
File
33.3 KB
Metzger et al. supplementary material
Metzger et al. supplementary material 2
Image
4.5 MB