Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T18:58:04.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mathematical Analysis of the Durations of Reinforced Inter-Response Times during Variable Interval Reinforcement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Samuel H. Revusky
Samuel H. Revusky*
Affiliation:
VA Hospital, Northampton, Massachusetts
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a free-responding situation in which reinforcements are scheduled by a variable interval program, the durations of reinforced inter-response times are shown to be a function of the durations of all inter-response times produced by S and of the frequency of reinforcement.

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , September 1962 , pp. 307 - 314
Copyright
Copyright © 1962 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Based on a portion of the author's doctoral dissertation, and supported in part by an NIMH predoctoral research fellowship. Suggestions by W. K. Estes increased the intelligibility of this paper.

References

Anger, D. The dependence of inter-response times upon the relative reinforcement of different inter-response times. J. exp. Psychol., 1956, 52, 145–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferster, C. B. and Skinner, B. F. Schedules of reinforcement, New York: Appelton-Century-Crofts, 1957.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mood, A. M. Introduction to the theory of statistics, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1950.Google Scholar
Mueller, C. G. Theoretical relationships among some measures of conditioning. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 1950, 36, 123–130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, M. P. and Keller, F. S. On the selective reinforcement of spaced responses. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1953, 46, 190–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

A correction has been issued for this article:

Erratum