Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:26:44.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Useful Sources

Part of: Beveridge Report Anniversary Collection: Towards A Sustainable Welfare State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2022

Michael McGann Open the ORCID record for Michael McGann [Opens in a new window]  and
Mary P. Murphy
Michael McGann
Affiliation:
Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland E-mail: michael.mcgann@mu.ie
Mary P. Murphy
Affiliation:
Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland E-mail: mary.p.murphy@mu.ie
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Some Useful Sources
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 21 , Issue 3: THEMED SECTION: Towards a Sustainable Welfare State , July 2022 , pp. 520 - 523
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Debates about sustainable welfare and eco-social policy cut across many fields, from environmental studies to political economy, to normative political theory, to comparative welfare state research, to active labour market policy, to income support and social protection. The key debates engaged with in this thematic section concern the relationship between eco-social policy and normative theories of wellbeing (human needs theory, capabilities approach), and the implications of such understandings of sustainable wellbeing for the provision of benefits and services. Also at issue, particularly in the latter contributions, is the intersection between eco-social policy and post-productivist theories of ‘work’, and what this entails for active labour market policy and the conditionality of income supports. This brings in a much larger debate about reconfiguring income supports, and the differences between universal basic income (UBI), a minimum income guarantee (Coote, this themed section), or a participation income (Laruffa et al., this themed section). The literature on UBI is vast, so only recent work articulating the relationship between UBI and the transition towards a more eco-socially sustainable welfare state has been included. The literatures on human needs theory and the capabilities approach are similarly extensive. Hence, only foundational work in those fields has been included, along with subsequent contributions that have applied those theories to issues of eco-social concern.

References

Eco-social policy and sustainable welfare

Büchs, M. and Koch, M. (2017) Postgrowth and Wellbeing: Challenges to Sustainable Welfare, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, T. (ed.) (2011) Understanding the Environment and Social Policy, Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, T. (ed) (2014) International Handbook on Social Policy and the Environment, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, I. (2015) ‘Welfare states and environmental states: a comparative analysis’, Environmental Politics, 25, 1, 24–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, I., Meadowcroft, J., Dryzek, J., Gerhards, J., Lengfeld, H., Markandya, A. and Ortiz, R. (2008) ‘JESP symposium: climate change and social policy’, Journal of European Social Policy, 18, 4, 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirvilammi, T. (2020) ‘The virtuous circle of sustainable welfare as a transformative policy idea’, Sustainability 12, 1, 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirvilammi, T. and Koch, M. (2020) ‘Sustainable welfare beyond growth’, Sustainability, 12, 5, 1824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, M. (2018) ‘Sustainable welfare, degrowth and eco-social policies in Europe’, in Vanhercke, B., Ghailani, D. and Sabato, S. (eds.), Social Policy in the European Union: State of Play 2018, Brussels: ETUI.Google Scholar
Koch, M. (2020) ‘The state in the transformation to a sustainable postgrowth economy’, Environmental Politics, 29, 1, 115–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, M. and Fritz, M. (2014) ‘Building the eco-social state: do welfare regimes matter?’, Journal of Social Policy, 43, 4, 679–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Human need theory

Doyal, L. and Gough, I. (1991) A Theory of Human Need, Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, D., Sahakian, M., Gumbert, T., Di Giulio, A., Maniates, M., Lorek, S. and Graf, A. (2021) Consumption Corridors: Living a Good Life within Sustainable Limits, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, I. (2014) ‘Lists and thresholds: comparing the Doyal-Gough theory of human need with Nussbaum’s capabilities approach‘, in Comim, F. and Nussbaum, M. C. (eds.), Capabilities, Gender, Equality: Towards Fundamental Entitlements, New York: Cambridge University Press, 357–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, I. (2017b) Heat, Greed and Human Need: Climate Change, Capitalism And Sustainable Wellbeing, Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar Ltd.Google Scholar
Gough, I. (2020b) ‘Defining floors and ceilings: the contribution of human needs theory’, Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 16, 1, 208–19.Google Scholar
Raworth, K. (2017) Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st Century Economist, London: RH Business Books.Google Scholar

Capabilities, Sustainability and Eco-Social Policy

Bonvin, J. M. and Laruffa, F. (2018) ‘Human beings as receivers, doers and judges. The anthropological foundations of sustainable public action in the capability approach’, Community, Work and Family, 21, 5, 502–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burger, P. and Christen, M. (2011) ‘Towards a capability approach of sustainability’, Critical Perspectives of Sustainable Development Research and Practice, 19, 8, 787–795.Google Scholar
Laruffa, F. (2020) ‘What is a capability-enhancing social policy? Individual autonomy, democratic citizenship and the insufficiency of the employment-focused paradigm ’. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 21, 1, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lessmann, O. and Rauschmayer, F. (eds) (2013) ‘The capability approach and sustainability’, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 14, 1, 1–5.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2000) Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M.C. (2011) Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach, Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robeyns, I. (2019) ‘What, if anything, is wrong with extreme wealth?’, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 20, 3, 251–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. (1999) Development as Freedom, New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (2009) The Idea of Justice, Cambridge, MA.: Belknap Press.Google Scholar

Universal Basic Services and the Foundational Economy

Bentham, J., Bowman, A., de la Cuesta, M., Engelen, E., Ertürk, I., Folkman, P., Froud, J., Johal, S., Law, J., Leaver, A., Moran, M. and Williams, K. (2013) Manifesto for the Foundational Economy, Manchester: Centre for Research on Socio-Cultural Change.Google Scholar
Büchs, M. (2021) ‘Sustainable welfare: how do universal basic income and universal basic services compare?’, Ecological Economics, 189, 107152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coote, A. (2021) ‘Universal basic services and sustainable consumption’, Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 17, 1, 32–46.Google Scholar
Coote, A. and Percy, A. (2020) The Case for Universal Basic Services, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Foundational Economy Collective (2018), Foundational Economy: The Infrastructure of Everyday Life, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Gough, I. (2019) ‘Universal basic services: a theoretical and moral framework’, Political Quarterly, 90, 3, 534–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Post-productivism, sustainability and work

Alcott, B. (2013) ‘Should degrowth embrace the job guarantee?’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 38, 56–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barca, S. (2019a) ‘An alternative worth fighting for: degrowth and the liberation of work’, in Chertkovskaya, E., Paulsson, A., and Barca, S. (eds.), Towards a Political Economy of Degrowth, London and New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 175–92.Google Scholar
Barry, J. (2019) ‘Green republicanism and a ‘Just Transition’ from the tyranny of economic growth’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 24, 5, 725–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deranty, J-P. (2021) ‘Post work as an oxymoron: we cannot and should not, wish work away’, European Journal of Social Theory, 1–18, DOI: 10.1177/13684310211012169.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, T. (2004) ‘A post-productivist future for social democracy?’, Social Policy and Society, 3, 3, 213–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, T. (2021) ‘Paradigm lost? Blocking the path to eco-social welfare and post-productivism’, in Deeming, C. (ed.), The Struggle for Social Sustainability, Bristol: Policy Press, 129–49.Google Scholar
Goodin, R. E. (2001) ‘Work and welfare: towards a post-productivist welfare regime’, British Journal of Political Science, 31, 1, 13–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, M. and Paulsen, R. (2020) ‘Resolving the ‘jobs-environment dilemma’? The case for critiques of work in sustainability research’, Environmental Sociology, 6, 4, 343–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, T. (2021) Post Growth: Life after Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Weeks, K. (2011) The Problem with Work, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Care and social reproduction

Barry, U. (2021) Gender Equality: Economic Value of Care from the Perspective of the Applicable EU Funds an Exploration of an EU Strategy Towards Valuing the Care Economy, Brussels: European Parliament.Google Scholar
Dowling, E. (2021) The Care Crisis: What Caused It and How Can We End It, London-New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Elson, D. (2012) ‘Social reproduction in the global recovery: rapid recovery or long-lasting depletion?’, in Utting, P., Buchholz, R. V. and Raavi, S. (eds.), The Global Crisis and Transformative Change, London: Palgrave, 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Institute for Gender Equality (2020) Gender Inequalities in Care and Consequences for the Labour Market, https://eige.europa.eu/publications/gender-inequalities-care-and-consequences-labour-market [accessed 09.09.2021].Google Scholar
Fisher, B. and Tronto, J. (1990) ‘Toward a feminist theory of caring’, in Abel, E. and Nelson, M. (eds.), Circles of Care: Work and Identity, Albany: SUNY Press, 35–62.Google Scholar
Folbre, N. (2015) Valuing Non-Market Work for UN Human Development Report, Geneva: UN Human Development Organisation, http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/valuing-care-work [accessed 09.09.2021].Google Scholar
Folbre, N. (2018) ‘The care penalty and gender inequality’, in Averett, S., Argys, L., and Hoffman, S. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Women and the Economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190628963.013.24.Google Scholar
Oxfam (2021) ‘Not all gaps are created equal the true value of care work’, https://www.oxfam.org/en/not-allgaps-are-created-equal-true-value-care-work [accessed 30.04.2021].Google Scholar
Tronto, J. (1993) Moral Boundaries. A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tronto, J. (2013) Caring Democracy: Markets, Equality, and Justice, New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
United Nations (2020) From Insights to Action: Gender Equality in the Wake of Covid-19, https://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2020/09/gender-equality-in-the-wake-of-covid-19 [accessed 08.09.2021].Google Scholar

Income support and eco-social policy (Participation Income, Basic Income, or Minimum Income Guarantee)

Atkinson, A. B. (1996) ‘The case for a Participation Income’, The Political Quarterly, 67, 1, 67–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birnbaum, S. (2010) ‘Introduction: basic income, sustainability and post-productivism’, Basic Income Studies, 4, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohnenberger, K. (2020) ‘Money, vouchers, public infrastructures? A framework for sustainable welfare benefits’, Sustainability, 12, 2, 596 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Wispelaere, J. and Stirton, L. (2007) ‘The public administration case against participation income’, Social Service Review, 81, 3, 523–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Wispelaere, J. and Stirton, L. (2018) ‘The case against participation income: political, not merely administrative’, Political Quarterly, 89, 2, 262–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groot, L., Muffels, R. and Verlaat, T. (2019) ‘Welfare states’ social investment strategies and the emergence of Dutch experiments on a minimum income guarantee’, Social Policy and Society, 18, 2, 277–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, R. P., Ashford, R., Ashford, N. A. and Arango-Quiroga, J. (2019) ‘Universal basic income and inclusive capitalism: consequences for sustainability’, Sustainability, 11, 16, 4481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiilamo, H. and Komp, K. (2018) ‘The case for a participation income: acknowledging and valuing the diversity of social participation’, Political Quarterly, 89, 2, 256–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawhon, M. and McCreary, T. (2020) ‘Beyond jobs vs environment: on the potential of universal basic income to reconfigure environmental politics’, Antipode, 52, 2, 452–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombardozzi, L. (2020) ‘Gender inequality, social reproduction and the universal basic income’, Political Quarterly, 91, 2, 317–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGann, M. and Murphy, M. P. (2021) ‘Income support in an eco-social state: the case for participation income’, Social Policy and Society, DOI: 10.1017/S1474746421000397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Muñoz, C. (2016) ‘A defence of participation income’, Journal of Public Policy, 36, 2, 169–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Muñoz, C. (2018) ‘Participation income and the provision of socially valuable activities’, Political Quarterly, 89, 2, 268–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinto, J. (2020) ‘Green republicanism and the shift to post-productivism: a defence of an unconditional basic income’, Res Publica, 26, 2, 257–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stirling, A. and Arnold, S. (2020) A Minimum Income Guarantee for the UK, London: New Economics Foundation, https://neweconomics.org/uploads/files/MIG-new.pdf [accessed 29.09.2020].Google Scholar
Swaton, S. (2018) ‘For an ecological transition income’, Green European Journal, https://www.greeneuropeanjournal.eu/for-an-ecological-transition-income/ [accessed 18.01 2021].Google Scholar