Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:57:49.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Understanding the development of bipolar disorder and borderline personality disorder in young people: a meta-review of systematic reviews

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2022

Buse Beril Durdurak*
Affiliation:
Institute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
Nada Altaweel
Affiliation:
Institute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
Rachel Upthegrove
Affiliation:
Institute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK Early Intervention Service, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
Steven Marwaha
Affiliation:
Institute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK Specialist Mood Disorders Clinic, Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Buse Beril Durdurak, E-mail: bxd057@student.bham.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

There is ongoing debate on the nosological position of bipolar disorder (BD) and borderline personality disorder (BPD). Identifying the unique and shared risks, developmental pathways, and symptoms in emerging BD and BPD could help the field refine aetiological hypotheses and improve the prediction of the onset of these disorders. This study aimed to: (a) systematically synthesise the available evidence from systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) concerning environmental, psychosocial, biological, and clinical factors leading to the emergence of BD and BPD; (b) identify the main differences and common features between the two disorders to characterise their complex interplay and, (c) highlight remaining evidence gaps.

Methods

Data sources were; PubMed, PsychINFO, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL, Medline, ISI Web of Science. Overlap of included SRs/MAs was assessed using the corrected covered area process. The methodological quality of each included SR and MA was assessed using the AMSTAR.

Results

22 SRs and MAs involving 249 prospective studies met eligibility criteria. Results demonstrated that family history of psychopathology, affective instability, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, anxiety disorders, depression, sleep disturbances, substance abuse, psychotic symptoms, suicidality, childhood adversity and temperament were common predisposing factors across both disorders. There are also distinct factors specific to emerging BD or BPD.

Conclusions

Prospective studies are required to increase our understanding of the development of BD and BPD onset and their complex interplay by concurrently examining multiple measures in BD and BPD at-risk populations.

Type
Review Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Differential diagnosis between bipolar disorder (BD) and borderline personality disorder (BPD) is often difficult due to the high frequency of comorbidity and overlap of symptoms between the two disorders (Baryshnikov et al., Reference Baryshnikov, Aaltonen, Koivisto, Näätänen, Karpov, Melartin and Isometsä2015). The prevalence of BD and BPD was 21.6% and 18.5% respectively (Fornaro et al. Reference Fornaro, Orsolini, Marini, De Berardis, Perna, Valchera and Stubbs2016). There is an ongoing debate over whether BPD should be considered as part of the spectrum of BD disorders (Akiskal, Reference Akiskal2004; Benazzi, Reference Benazzi2006; Deltito et al., Reference Deltito, Martin, Riefkohl, Austria, Kissilenko, Corless and Morse2001; McGlashan, Reference McGlashan1983; Zimmerman, Ruggero, Chelminski, & Young, Reference Zimmerman, Ruggero, Chelminski and Young2009) or not (Bassett et al., Reference Bassett, Mulder, Outhred, Hamilton, Morris, Das and Malhi2017; Paris & Black, Reference Paris and Black2015).

Although BD and BPD are defined as distinct psychopathologies in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5; American Psychiatric Association, 2013) and International Classification of Diseases (ICD; World Health Organisation, 2015), there are many common features between these disorders that contribute to diagnostic confusion. The common features that are frequently stated in the literature are affective instability (AI), impulsivity, troubled relationships, distractibility, irritability, suicidality, flight of thoughts and childhood adversity (John & Sharma, Reference John and Sharma2009). The clinical evidence against for the existence of a ‘bipolar-borderline continuum’ argue that although there are common symptoms between the two, they present these traits differently (e.g. Henry et al., Reference Henry, Mitropoulou, New, Koenigsberg, Silverman and Siever2001; Renaud, Corbalan, and Beaulieu, Reference Renaud, Corbalan and Beaulieu2012). However, in practical terms these distinctions are far from clear, particularly when there is no history of manic episodes (Sanches, Reference Sanches2019). For instance, differences in intensity or frequency might exist when comparing the two conditions for AI, but it is also unclear whether the anger and anxiety that BPD patients experience are distinct in nature than the mood experienced in a dysphoric or irritable manic state (MacKinnon & Pies, Reference MacKinnon and Pies2006). A concern that has compounded these issues is the increasing recognition that mood can be highly variable in people with BD outside of frank manic or depressive episodes, a move away from the traditional view of euthymia in BD (Bonsall, Wallace-Hadrill, Geddes, Goodwin, & Holmes, Reference Bonsall, Wallace-Hadrill, Geddes, Goodwin and Holmes2012).

There is also ambiguity of the relationship between impulsiveness and the diagnostic syndromes between BD and BPD. Impulsivity is considered to be a stable symptom of BPD diagnosis like AI (Wilson & Stanley, Reference Wilson and Stanley2007). However, Zanarini, Frankenburg, Hennen, Reich, and Silk (Reference Zanarini, Frankenburg, Hennen, Reich and Silk2005) in their longitudinal study found that impulsive traits were likely to remit in the future in BPD patients. On the contrary, although impulsivity is considered to be episodic in nature in BD, Swann, Pazzaglia, Nicholls, Dougherty, and Moeller (Reference Swann, Pazzaglia, Nicholls, Dougherty and Moeller2003) found that impulsivity had both state and trait related aspects in BD patients.

Practitioners are facing challenges when they attempt to classify the symptoms of these disorders based on the DSM's and ICD's classifications because these disorders sometimes do not fall clearly into state- and trait- like categories resulting in under, over or misdiagnoses (Ruggero, Zimmerman, Chelminski, & Young, Reference Ruggero, Zimmerman, Chelminski and Young2010; Wilson & Stanley, Reference Wilson and Stanley2007; Zimmerman, Ruggero, Chelminski, & Young, Reference Zimmerman, Ruggero, Chelminski and Young2008). Investigating the early signs and symptoms in leading to the development of BD and BPD could be beneficial to clarify which symptoms are the most sensitive and specific markers of these disorders in young people. Whilst these studies will help determine their pathogenesis, they could also let us understand whether they are distinct clinical entities. Additionally, young people's affinity to impulsive and self-harming behaviour places them at-risk for adverse health outcomes (Kaess, Brunner, & Chanen, Reference Kaess, Brunner and Chanen2014). Both BD and BPD are associated with severe impairment in psychosocial functioning and a high suicide rate (Zimmerman et al., Reference Zimmerman, Martinez, Young, Chelminski, Morgan and Dalrymple2014). The risk for suicide among individuals diagnosed with BD are up to 20–30 times greater than that for the general population (Pompili et al., Reference Pompili, Gonda, Serafini, Innamorati, Sher, Amore and Girardi2013) while the lifetime suicide rate for BPD is estimated to be 8% (Pompili, Girardi, Ruberto, & Tatarelli, Reference Pompili, Girardi, Ruberto and Tatarelli2005). Thus, it is critically important to synthesise and evaluate the current evidence which examine the interaction between environmental, biological, sociocultural, and clinical precursor signs and symptoms and their relationship to onset of BPD and BD diagnosis.

Many studies, including systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs), have examined factors related to emerging BD and BPD (e.g. Ratheesh et al., Reference Ratheesh, Davey, Hetrick, Alvarez-Jimenez, Voutier, Bechdolf and Cotton2017; Stepp, Lazarus, and Byrd, Reference Stepp, Lazarus and Byrd2016). However, none of them compared BD and BPD at-risk populations concurrently, probably because there is still no consensus around BD prodrome and emerging BPD traits (Berk et al., Reference Berk, Conus, Lucas, Hallam, Malhi, Dodd, Yatham and McGorry2007; Chanen & Kaess, Reference Chanen and Kaess2011; Skjelstad, Malt, & Holte, Reference Skjelstad, Malt and Holte2010). Thus, a meta review of reviews approach to synthesising this evidence was adopted to be able to make this comparison. By synthesising the evidence now, future studies can investigate these common and distinct features cross-diagnostically in at-risk BD and BPD populations to provide better clinical diagnosis and treatment.

The aim of this review is to systematically assess SRs and MAs from prospective studies on factors that are associated with the early course of BD and BPD symptoms, features, or onset to be able to understand the differences and similarities in developmental pathways to these disorders and to determine whether they are two distinct clinical entities or belong on a continuum within the affective spectrum.

Methods

Protocol and registration

The protocol was registered with PROSPERO in January 2021 (registration no. CRD42021235193).

Search strategy

The most current version of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for conducting SRs Moher et al.'s (Reference Moher, Shamseer, Clarke, Ghersi, Liberati, Petticrew and Stewart2015) guidelines were used as a framework (Page et al., Reference Page, McKenzie, Bossuyt, Boutron, Hoffmann, Mulrow and Moher2021). An extensive search of papers catalogued in Embase, PsychINFO, PubMed, CINAHL, COCHRANE, ISI Web of Science, Medline databases was conducted in January 2021. Search terms were agreed by the authors following a scoping search. The terms were then modified following advice from a librarian and field experts. The search was conducted by combining six groups of terms using medical subject headings (MeSH) and text words (see online Supplementary) relating to; borderline personality disorder (e.g. ‘borderline personality’), bipolar disorder (e.g. ‘bipolar disorder’), risk factors/onset (e.g. ‘develop*’ OR risk*), longitudinal studies (e.g. ‘prospective study’), youth (e.g. ‘young adult’) and systematic reviews/meta-analyses (e.g. ‘systematic review’). In addition, we hand searched 10 specialty journals and reference lists. We also examined the first 30 pages in Google Scholar using the terms ‘bipolar AND borderline personality AND systematic review’. The search was updated in February 2022.

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria were:

  1. (1) SRs or MAs containing at least one relevant prospective study with at least 2 structured clinical assessments and diagnostic outcome at follow-up of BD or BPD onset, prodrome, features or symptoms

  2. (2) Measure the precursor and/or vulnerability factor related to the BD/BPD outcomes prior to the outcome assessment of BD or BPD

  3. (3) Include a clinical, high-risk or community population

  4. (4) Include studies that assess BD or BPD through fully, semi-, or unstructured interviews administered by mental health professionals, symptom checklists, self-reports, interviews, or self-reported questionnaires that are based on standard classification systems such as, the International Classification of Diseases (ICD; World Health Organisation, 2015) or the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM; American Psychiatric Association, 2013)

  5. (5) Include studies reporting group comparisons between participants with BD or BPD and healthy or clinical control on any factor related to the BD or BPD outcome

Exclusion criteria were:

  1. (1) Reviews including only intervention, cross-sectional, or other studies where the exposure was collected retrospectively and no relevant prospective study

  2. (2) Dissertation papers, books, book chapters, editorials, letters, or conference proceedings

  3. (3) Reviews including studies that were not reporting precursors of transitions or symptoms/features

  4. (4) Genetic studies

  5. (5) Full text of the manuscript is not available

Study selection and data management

A bespoke data extraction form was developed in Microsoft Excel prior manuscript review. Two independent authors (BD, NA) performed all the initial screening steps on the pre-defined eligibility criteria, and disagreements were solved through discussion with a third reviewer (SM). No publication or language restrictions were applied. Title and abstract screening were conducted using the Endnote X9 reference management tool for full text retrieval. Authors independently searched the full-text articles for inclusion in the review. BD and NA managed and extracted relevant data in duplicate from each eligible study on the extraction form relating to relevant study information (e.g. sample characteristics, aims, number of databases sourced and searched, type of factor studied and outcomes) and risk of bias quality assessment. The results of the extracted data were then cross-checked.

Risk of bias assessment

Two authors (BD, NA) independently assessed the methodological quality of each included SR and MA using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR; Shea et al., Reference Shea, Grimshaw, Wells, Boers, Andersson, Hamel and Bouter2007).

Data synthesis and analysis

Data were qualitatively synthesised within the review as the data were not suitable for quantitative synthesis due to the high heterogeneity among reviews.

Overlapping data

Overlap of included SRs/MAs was assessed using the corrected covered area [CCA; Pieper, Antoine, Mathes, Neugebauer, and Eikermann (Reference Pieper, Antoine, Mathes, Neugebauer and Eikermann2014)]. Pieper et al.'s (Reference Pieper, Antoine, Mathes, Neugebauer and Eikermann2014) protocol according to ${\rm CCA} = {{{\rm N}-{\rm r}} \over {{\rm rc}-{\rm r}}}$ was followed, where N is the total number of included studies in SRs/MAs (including double counting), r is the number of primary studies, and c is the number of SRs/MAs. Overlap thresholds were used for interpretations of overlapping data; 0–5% – slight, 6–10% – moderate, 11–15% – high, >15% – very high (Pieper et al., Reference Pieper, Antoine, Mathes, Neugebauer and Eikermann2014). For each disorder, a citation matrix and pairwise CCA tables were provided to address the overlap.

Results

Description of studies

As shown in the PRISMA flow chart (Fig. 1), the literature search yielded 1485 records, 1073 were screened after duplication and 89 retrieved in full text. 66 articles were subsequently excluded with reasons (see online Supplementary Table S5) leaving 22 SRs and MAs to be synthesised in this SR of reviews.

Fig. 1. Flowchart of main search strategy and article selection for systematic review of review.

Online Supplementary Tables S1 and S2 summarise the main characteristics of the 22 eligible SRs/MAs. The studies were published between 2011 and 2022. Nine studies are SRs and MAs, ten studies conducted SR of the literature with narrative syntheses of the results, and three performed MAs. The 22 reviews varied by population and outcomes.

In BD at-risk studies, three reviews studied individuals with depression who later showed (hypo)manic symptoms, six reviews studied individuals who developed BD at follow-up or at-risk for BD, six reviews studied high-risk offspring of BD and two reviews studied BD cohort with a recent first episode of mania. Three studies examined multiple factors, one examined suicidality, one examined cannabis use, one examined aberrancy in white matter, one examined grey matter changes, one examined childhood adversity, four examined sleep alterations, one examined development of BD in patients with ADHD and three examined family history of BD.

In BPD at-risk studies, two studied individuals who showed BPD symptoms or features or diagnosed with BPD at follow-up and three studied individuals diagnosed with BPD at baseline or showed BPD features, symptoms or diagnosed with BPD at follow-up. Three studies examined several factors related to BPD outcomes, one examined neurobiological correlates and one examined sleep profile.

Primary studies

Within the 22 SRs, there were 678 primary studies of which 249 met the eligibility criteria for this SR of reviews (see online Supplementary Tables S1 and S2 for the number of relevant prospective studies synthesised for each study). The other 428 primary studies were excluded mostly because they were not prospective studies, or the participants had a full-syndromal diagnosis at the first intake. In BD studies, there were 2 418 329 participants across all included primary studies, of whom 127 706 were included in this review. BPD studies included 125 406 participants in total, of whom 82 015 were eligible to include in this review. The methodology applied here is in line with Prousali et al.'s (Reference Prousali, Haidich, Fontalis, Ziakas, Brazitikos and Mataftsi2019) overview of reviews.

Overlapping Data for BD and BPD Studies

The 17 included SRs and MAs for BD comprised 250 overlapping individual studies, of which 145 were unique. Five included SRs and MAs for BPD comprised 74 overlapping individual studies, of which 64 were unique. A citation matrix presenting all the included SRs and MAs on BD and BPD in columns and index publications in rows and pairwise CCA tables are provided in online Supplementary Tables S8, S9, Figs S1 and S2.

$$\eqalign{{\rm CCA} = & \displaystyle{{{\rm N}-{\rm r}} \over {{\rm rc}-{\rm r}}} = \displaystyle{{( {250-145} ) } \over {( {145 \times 22-145} ) }} \cr = & \sim 0.03\% \;{\rm Slight\ Overlap\ for\ BD\ studies}} $$
$$\eqalign{{\rm CCA} = & \displaystyle{{{\rm N}-{\rm r}} \over {{\rm rc}-{\rm r}}} = \displaystyle{{( {74-64} ) } \over {( {64 \times 5-64} ) }}\;\cr = & \sim 0.04\% \;{\rm Slight\ Overlap\ for\ BPD\ studies}} $$

As CCA is estimated at %0.03 for BD studies and 0.04 for BPD studies, the overlap is in the low range reflecting a low risk of skewed reporting (Pieper et al., Reference Pieper, Antoine, Mathes, Neugebauer and Eikermann2014).

Assessment of methodological quality

Based on the findings from AMSTAR ratings that were performed to evaluate the methodological quality of the included SRs/MAs, the majority of the reviews were deemed to be high quality (see online Supplementary Tables S1 and S2, full assessments provided in online Supplementary Tables S6 and S7).

Synthesis of results

Online Supplementary Tables S3 and S4 summarises the findings of SRs/MAs, respectively. A summary of the shared factors in emerging BD and BPD can be seen in Table 1. The evidence for developmental precursors that are prospectively related to BD and BPD outcomes are presented below except for the vulnerability factors which can be found in the online Supplementary.

Table 1. Similarities and differences in shared factors in emerging bipolar disorder and borderline personality disorder

ADHD, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; BD, bipolar disorder; BPD, borderline personality disorder; GAD, generalised anxiety disorder; MDD, major depressive disorder; NOS, not otherwise specified; OCD, obsessive compulsive disorder; SP, social phobia; SUD, substance use sisorder.

Here we define the precursors (e.g. clinical symptoms, signs or syndromes, prodromes, biomarkers) and vulnerability risk factors (e.g. gender, family history of psychopathology, childhood adversity) as prospectively identified variables that increase the odds of later BD onset, BPD onset or features.

At-risk BD reviews differed in how they defined at-risk BD; the participants were either at familial (e.g. offspring of BD) and/or clinical risk (e.g. youth with subthreshold mania) for BD stages either at 0, 1a, 1b, or 2 (see online Supplementary Table S1). At-risk BPD reviews did not define an at-risk state for BPD but examined papers which included community or clinical samples who had BPD symptoms, features, or diagnosis at follow-up assessment (see online Supplementary Table S2).

Biological factors

Three reviews reported data regarding differences in the white matter in a high-risk population (Hu, Stavish, Leibenluft, & Linke, Reference Hu, Stavish, Leibenluft and Linke2020), neural reward circuit dysfunction (Bart, Titone, Ng, Nusslock, & Alloy, Reference Bart, Titone, Ng, Nusslock and Alloy2021) and longitudinal grey matter changes following first episode mania (Cahn, Keramatian, Frysch, Yatham, & Chakrabarty, Reference Cahn, Keramatian, Frysch, Yatham and Chakrabarty2021) compared to healthy controls. Hu et al. (Reference Hu, Stavish, Leibenluft and Linke2020) indicated that the trajectory of fractional anisotropy reduction did not differ significantly between high-risk young adults and controls. Cahn et al. (Reference Cahn, Keramatian, Frysch, Yatham and Chakrabarty2021) found that adolescents with mania fail to exhibit normal increases in amygdala volume. No comparable studies were available for BPD. According to Bart et al.'s (Reference Bart, Titone, Ng, Nusslock and Alloy2021) findings, lower right ventral striatum–left caudal anterior cingulate functional connectivity to loss and greater right pars orbitalis–orbitofrontal cortex functional connectivity to reward may be trait-level neural markers that may reflect risk for BD in at-risk youth. Additionally, lower parietal cortical thickness may lead to lower executive functioning and emotional regulation capacity and predispose to higher future mixed/mania and irritability.

Clinical factors

Suicidality

Two reviews provided evidence for the association between suicidality and transition to BD (de Cardoso, Mondin, Azevedo, Toralles, & de Mattos Souza, Reference de Cardoso, Mondin, Azevedo, Toralles and de Mattos Souza2018; Ratheesh et al., Reference Ratheesh, Davey, Hetrick, Alvarez-Jimenez, Voutier, Bechdolf and Cotton2017). Both reviews reported inconsistent results for the association between suicidality and later BD onset; out of seven individual studies they included, only four found a significant association between suicidality and later BD.

For BPD, two reviews assessed this association. Stepp et al. (Reference Stepp, Lazarus and Byrd2016) found consistent prospective associations between suicidality and later BPD symptoms, whereas Winsper et al. (Reference Winsper, Lereya, Marwaha, Thompson, Eyden and Singh2016a) found suicidal ideation in adolescence was not stable after post-hospitalisation.

Affective instability

Data regarding the effect of AI on risk for BD was provided by three reviews (Faedda et al., Reference Faedda, Marangoni, Serra, Salvatore, Sani, Vázquez and Koukopoulos2015; Keramatian, Chakrabarty, Saraf, & Yatham, Reference Keramatian, Chakrabarty, Saraf and Yatham2021; Ratheesh et al., Reference Ratheesh, Davey, Hetrick, Alvarez-Jimenez, Voutier, Bechdolf and Cotton2017). All three studies found that AI predicted BD onset.

For BPD, both Stepp et al. (Reference Stepp, Lazarus and Byrd2016) and Skabeikyte and Barkauskiene (Reference Skabeikyte and Barkauskiene2021) found that AI and other negative affectivity symptoms such as emotionality and aggressiveness/tantrums predicted increases in mean levels of BPD features through adolescence.

Depression

Three reviews studied the relationship between depression and BD (Faedda et al., Reference Faedda, Marangoni, Serra, Salvatore, Sani, Vázquez and Koukopoulos2015; Keramatian et al., Reference Keramatian, Chakrabarty, Saraf and Yatham2021; Ratheesh et al., Reference Ratheesh, Davey, Hetrick, Alvarez-Jimenez, Voutier, Bechdolf and Cotton2017). They found that major depressive episodes, unipolar depression, depressive disorders NOS, mild depressive episodes, early onset of depression, longer and higher number of depressive episodes, greater loading of depressive symptoms, and higher recurrence rates, severity of depression, guilt, psychomotor retardation and AI coexistent with major depressive disorder (MDD) predicted transition to BD. There was also a significant association between age of onset of depression and later BD. The associations for recurrent MDD, chronicity of depression, atypical feature, hypersomnic-retarded depression, and conversion to BD was inconsistent.

For BPD, two reviews found significant association between depression and later BPD (Skabeikyte & Barkauskiene, Reference Skabeikyte and Barkauskiene2021; Stepp et al., Reference Stepp, Lazarus and Byrd2016). Additionally, decreases in depression severity predicted faster declines in average levels of BPD symptoms.

Subsyndromal hypomania

Evidence regarding hypomanic symptoms was available from three reviews for BD (Faedda et al., Reference Faedda, Marangoni, Serra, Salvatore, Sani, Vázquez and Koukopoulos2015; Keramatian et al., Reference Keramatian, Chakrabarty, Saraf and Yatham2021; Ratheesh et al., Reference Ratheesh, Davey, Hetrick, Alvarez-Jimenez, Voutier, Bechdolf and Cotton2017). They found that higher scores on Hypomanic Personality Scale (HPS), lifetime subsyndromal hypomanic symptoms and the combination of subclinical mania with subclinical psychosis at baseline significantly predicted transition to BD. Keramatian et al. (Reference Keramatian, Chakrabarty, Saraf and Yatham2021) also reported association between antidepressant associated subthreshold hypomanic episodes and transition to BD. No comparable studies were available for BPD.

Cyclothymia and bipolar NOS

Faedda et al. (Reference Faedda, Marangoni, Serra, Salvatore, Sani, Vázquez and Koukopoulos2015) and Keramatian et al. (Reference Keramatian, Chakrabarty, Saraf and Yatham2021) indicated earlier onset Bipolar NOS predicted conversion to BD. Similarly, cyclothymic disorder and hyperthymic temperaments significantly predicted diagnoses of BD. No comparable studies were available for BPD.

Psychosis and psychotic symptoms

Two reviews assessed the associations between psychotic symptoms and later BD (Faedda et al., Reference Faedda, Marangoni, Serra, Salvatore, Sani, Vázquez and Koukopoulos2015; Ratheesh et al., Reference Ratheesh, Davey, Hetrick, Alvarez-Jimenez, Voutier, Bechdolf and Cotton2017). They demonstrated that psychotic features significantly predicted conversion to BD. Higher conversion rates to BD were also found in people with psychosis NOS, schizotypal features, and schizophrenia nuclear symptoms but the results were inconsistent.

Only one review indicated significant associations between psychotic symptoms and later BPD (Stepp et al., Reference Stepp, Lazarus and Byrd2016).

Substance use

Three reviews investigated the association between SUD and conversion to BD (Gibbs et al., Reference Gibbs, Winsper, Marwaha, Gilbert, Broome and Singh2015; Keramatian et al., Reference Keramatian, Chakrabarty, Saraf and Yatham2021; Ratheesh et al., Reference Ratheesh, Davey, Hetrick, Alvarez-Jimenez, Voutier, Bechdolf and Cotton2017). Gibbs et al. (Reference Gibbs, Winsper, Marwaha, Gilbert, Broome and Singh2015) and Keramatian et al. (Reference Keramatian, Chakrabarty, Saraf and Yatham2021) reported consistent significant associations between cannabis use and hypo/sub-threshold mania symptoms. The magnitude of this relationship was small to medium. Ratheesh et al. (Reference Ratheesh, Davey, Hetrick, Alvarez-Jimenez, Voutier, Bechdolf and Cotton2017), on the other hand, reported inconsistent results among studies examining the association between SUD and later BD.

Three reviews assessed the associations between SUD and later BPD symptoms (Skabeikyte & Barkauskiene, Reference Skabeikyte and Barkauskiene2021; Stepp et al., Reference Stepp, Lazarus and Byrd2016; Winsper et al., Reference Winsper, Lereya, Marwaha, Thompson, Eyden and Singh2016a). Skabeikyte and Barkauskiene (Reference Skabeikyte and Barkauskiene2021) indicated that SUD was predictive of changes in BPD features during adolescence whereas, Stepp et al. (Reference Stepp, Lazarus and Byrd2016) and Winsper et al. (Reference Winsper, Lereya, Marwaha, Thompson, Eyden and Singh2016a) found significant associations.

Antidepressant use

The association between antidepressant use and later BD was examined in two reviews; while Ratheesh et al. (Reference Ratheesh, Davey, Hetrick, Alvarez-Jimenez, Voutier, Bechdolf and Cotton2017) reported a non-significant relationship, Keramatian et al. (Reference Keramatian, Chakrabarty, Saraf and Yatham2021) found that exposure to antidepressants during follow-up was associated with increased risk of conversion. However, the evidence was available from only one primary study. No comparable studies were available for BPD.

Comorbidity with internalising and externalising disorders

Data regarding the association between comorbid disorders and later BD was available from three reviews (Brancati, Perugi, Milone, Masi, & Sesso, Reference Brancati, Perugi, Milone, Masi and Sesso2021; Keramatian et al., Reference Keramatian, Chakrabarty, Saraf and Yatham2021; Ratheesh et al., Reference Ratheesh, Davey, Hetrick, Alvarez-Jimenez, Voutier, Bechdolf and Cotton2017). Ratheesh et al. (Reference Ratheesh, Davey, Hetrick, Alvarez-Jimenez, Voutier, Bechdolf and Cotton2017) found comorbid social phobia and comorbid attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) significantly predicted later BD onset. Results for comorbid generalised anxiety disorder and comorbid anxiety disorders as a group were inconsistent. Brancati et al. (Reference Brancati, Perugi, Milone, Masi and Sesso2021) indicated a significantly greater risk of BD occurrence in ADHD patients v. healthy controls. Keramatian et al. (Reference Keramatian, Chakrabarty, Saraf and Yatham2021) found that anxiety disorders predicted conversion to BD in youth.

Evidence concerning the comorbidity with other mental health illnesses and later BPD symptoms were examined in three reviews (Skabeikyte & Barkauskiene, Reference Skabeikyte and Barkauskiene2021; Stepp et al., Reference Stepp, Lazarus and Byrd2016; Winsper et al., Reference Winsper, Lereya, Marwaha, Thompson, Eyden and Singh2016a). They indicated childhood inattention, oppositional behaviour, anxiety symptoms, ADHD, somatisation significantly predicted the new onset of BPD and BPD symptom changes. They also reported significant associations between dissociation, conduct disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, depression, and later BPD symptoms. Individual social and physical aggression in childhood and comorbid obsessive compulsive disorder, on the contrary, did not predict BPD symptom changes.

Temperament/personality traits

Evidence regarding temperament in BD at-risk populations was available from one review (Keramatian et al., Reference Keramatian, Chakrabarty, Saraf and Yatham2021). They found key symptoms to identify children with BD from well children in cohort samples; sensitivity, hyper alertness, anxiety/worry, somatic complaints, bold/intrusive, excessive talking, talking too loudly, decreased sleep, and impaired role in school.

Two reviews assessed the association between temperament/personality and later BPD (Skabeikyte & Barkauskiene, Reference Skabeikyte and Barkauskiene2021; Stepp et al., Reference Stepp, Lazarus and Byrd2016). Low levels of sociability, high levels of emotionality, activity and shyness in childhood, poor self-control, experiential avoidance, and disturbances in self-representation predicted later BPD symptoms.

Attachment

One review reported associations between attachment style and later BPD symptoms (Stepp et al., Reference Stepp, Lazarus and Byrd2016). They indicated that disorganised/controlling behaviour in childhood and insecure attachment in peer relationships predicted BPD symptoms in adolescence. The results for attachment disorganisation and security in infancy and toddlerhood and later BPD symptoms were inconsistent. No comparable data were available for BD.

Impulsivity

Two reviews reported associations between impulsivity and later BPD symptoms (Skabeikyte & Barkauskiene, Reference Skabeikyte and Barkauskiene2021; Stepp et al., Reference Stepp, Lazarus and Byrd2016). They demonstrated that impulsivity (e.g. effortful control, low self- control, and low constraint) was predictive of BPD symptoms and new onset of BPD in adolescence. No comparable evidence was available for BD.

Sleep disturbances

Evidence regarding the association between sleep disorders and the risk of developing BD were available from five reviews (Keramatian et al., Reference Keramatian, Chakrabarty, Saraf and Yatham2021; Pancheri et al., Reference Pancheri, Verdolini, Pacchiarotti, Samalin, Delle Chiaie, Biondi and Murru2019; Ritter, Marx, Bauer, Lepold, & Pfennig, Reference Ritter, Marx, Bauer, Lepold and Pfennig2011; Scott et al., Reference Scott, Etain, Miklowitz, Crouse, Carpenter, Marwaha and Hickie2022; Scott, Kallestad, Vedaa, Sivertsen, & Etain, Reference Scott, Kallestad, Vedaa, Sivertsen and Etain2021). Pancheri et al. (Reference Pancheri, Verdolini, Pacchiarotti, Samalin, Delle Chiaie, Biondi and Murru2019) and Ritter et al. (Reference Ritter, Marx, Bauer, Lepold and Pfennig2011) indicated that the offspring of patients with BD had sleep problems more frequently compared to not-at-risk offspring with a 30-fold increased risk to develop. The high-risk offspring with poor sleep were also more likely to develop BD. Keramatian et al. (Reference Keramatian, Chakrabarty, Saraf and Yatham2021), Scott et al. (Reference Scott, Kallestad, Vedaa, Sivertsen and Etain2021), and Scott et al. (Reference Scott, Etain, Miklowitz, Crouse, Carpenter, Marwaha and Hickie2022) found that individuals with a history any type of sleep disturbance had an increased odds of developing BD.

Only one review reported associations between sleep problems and later BPD (Winsper et al., Reference Winsper, Tang, Marwaha, Lereya, Gibbs, Thompson and Singh2017). They found that chronic nightmares and chronic sleep disturbances were significantly associated with later BPD.

Disruptive behaviour disorders (DBD)

DBD was associated with subsequent manic, mixed, or hypomanic episodes in one BD at-risk review (Keramatian et al., Reference Keramatian, Chakrabarty, Saraf and Yatham2021). No comparable studies were available for BPD at-risk.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first meta review of reviews aiming to understand the developmental pathways of BD and BPD, disorders that share some phenotypic features that could imply an overlap of aetiological mechanisms. 22 eligible reviews provided significant data about the factors which might contribute to the onset of BD or BPD. The current meta-review demonstrates that there are many ‘distinct’ clinical, environmental, psychosocial, and biological variables that can be found early in the course of BD and BPD, even in at-risk stages, but the disorders share a variety of clinical and vulnerability factors too. However, since these ‘distinct’ variables are evident only either in BD or BPD at-risk reviews, their distinctive value is speculative until further systematic longitudinal studies examine these factors in both disorders.

A notable and critical limitation of the literature is there were no studies comparing BD and BPD at-risk populations at the same time, compounding the difficulty of understanding specific BD or BPD developmental trajectory. Additionally, the neurobiological data from the BD at-risk studies are currently limited and there are no comparing studies done in BPD at-risk populations. This is why despite many previous commentary pieces on this issue (Bassett, Reference Bassett2012; Bayes et al., Reference Bayes, McClure, Fletcher, Román Ruiz del Moral, Hadzi-Pavlovic, Stevenson and Parker2015; Deltito et al., Reference Deltito, Martin, Riefkohl, Austria, Kissilenko, Corless and Morse2001; Massó Rodriguez et al., Reference Massó Rodriguez, Hogg, Gardoki-Souto, Valiente-Gómez, Trabsa, Mosquera and Amann2021; Paris, Reference Paris2004; Sanches, Reference Sanches2019; Smith, Muir, & Blackwood, Reference Smith, Muir and Blackwood2004; Stone, Reference Stone2006; Zimmerman & Morgan, Reference Zimmerman and Morgan2013a, Reference Zimmerman and Morgan2013b), in reality at the current time it is not possible to answer whether these disorders should be on the same affective continuum, or they should be regarded as separate nosological conditions.

Gender, differences in the white matter, changes in the amygdala, neural reward circuit dysfunctions, DBD, subsyndromal hypomania, cyclothymia or bipolar NOS, frequency and loading of affective symptoms, and antidepressant use were factors examined only in BD studies. Only changes in the amygdala, neural reward circuit dysfunctions, subdyndromal hypomania, cyclothymia or bipolar NOS, frequency and loading of affective symptoms consistently predicted BD transition. Interestingly there was no data available for emerging BPD for cyclothymia although previous research comparing participants with BD and BPD found that participants with BPD too show similar or even higher levels of abnormal cyclothymic temperament (Eich et al., Reference Eich, Gamma, Malti, Vogt Wehrli, Liebrenz, Seifritz and Modestin2014; Nilsson, Jørgensen, Straarup, & Licht, Reference Nilsson, Jørgensen, Straarup and Licht2010). Previous evidence also shows that hypomanic days were reported frequently in both the BD and BPD subcohort (Socada, Söderholm, Rosenström, Ekelund, & Isometsä, Reference Socada, Söderholm, Rosenström, Ekelund and Isometsä2021). However, based on our findings while hypomanic symptoms predicted BD onset (Faedda et al., Reference Faedda, Marangoni, Serra, Salvatore, Sani, Vázquez and Koukopoulos2015), there was no data pertaining to BPD onset. Likewise, accumulated evidence shows BD patients demonstrated enlarged amygdala (Soares & Young, Reference Soares and Young2016) while BPD patients showed decreased amygdala volumes (Perez-Rodriguez et al., Reference Perez-Rodriguez, Bulbena-Cabré, Bassir Nia, Zipursky, Goodman and New2018). Our results are not in accordance with these results because according to Cahn et al.'s (Reference Cahn, Keramatian, Frysch, Yatham and Chakrabarty2021) findings, adolescents with mania failed to exhibit normal increases in amygdala volume. It is interesting that studies of people who are at-risk of developing BD has showed decreased in amygdala volumes while previous studies with BPD populations have also showed the same results. However, since there was no data on amygdala changes or hypomania symptoms in participants with BPD features, it is not possible to conclude at the moment whether both at-risk populations fail to exhibit normal increases in amygdala or hypomania is a shared feature.

Hu et al. (Reference Hu, Stavish, Leibenluft and Linke2020) indicated that differences in white matter integrity between high-risk individuals and control could occur in earlier childhood. This is consistent with a SR (Serafini et al., Reference Serafini, Pompili, Borgwardt, Houenou, Geoffroy, Jardri and Amore2014) which found reduced corpus collosum volume and increased rates of deep white matter hyperintensities were more specific to paediatric BD in comparison to unipolar depression. There is however a need to replicate these findings with future longitudinal follow-up studies in both at-risk populations.

Amongst the factors examined in relation to transition to BD, the greatest amount of evidence was for family history of BD. Although inconsistencies in results were present in family history of BD studies (Keramatian et al., Reference Keramatian, Chakrabarty, Saraf and Yatham2021; Lau et al., Reference Lau, Hawes, Hunt, Frankland, Roberts and Mitchell2017; Narayan, Allen, Cullen, & Klimes-Dougan, Reference Narayan, Allen, Cullen and Klimes-Dougan2013; Rasic, Hajek, Alda, & Uher, Reference Rasic, Hajek, Alda and Uher2013; Ratheesh et al., Reference Ratheesh, Davey, Hetrick, Alvarez-Jimenez, Voutier, Bechdolf and Cotton2017), some studies suggest that there might be a relative specificity of family history of BD to predicting later BD in MDD samples (Ratheesh et al., Reference Ratheesh, Davey, Hetrick, Alvarez-Jimenez, Voutier, Bechdolf and Cotton2017; Vandeleur, Merikangas, Strippoli, Castelao, & Preisig, Reference Vandeleur, Merikangas, Strippoli, Castelao and Preisig2013). Likewise, the evidence in the current review was also inconsistent as some of the individual studies found a significant relationship between a family history of other mental illnesses (i.e. affective disorder or depression) and later BD conversion while the others did not. This is not surprising because although high-risk studies can be informative about transition to BD (DelBello & Geller, Reference DelBello and Geller2001; Duffy et al., Reference Duffy, Doucette, Lewitzka, Alda, Hajek and Grof2011; McGuffin et al., Reference McGuffin, Rijsdijk, Andrew, Sham, Katz and Cardno2003), these studies still have not supported the validity of the pre-pubertal BD phenotype and not all children of parents with BD develop BD or a mood disorder (Duffy, Carlson, Dubicka, & Hillegers, Reference Duffy, Carlson, Dubicka and Hillegers2020; Malhi, Moore, & McGuffin, Reference Malhi, Moore and McGuffin2000; Malhi, Morris, Hamilton, Outhred, & Mannie, Reference Malhi, Morris, Hamilton, Outhred and Mannie2017).

Parenting behaviour/style, parent-child relationship quality, maternal characteristics, attachment, impulsivity, experiential avoidance, disturbances in self representation, dissociation, comorbid oppositional defiant disorder, comorbid conduct disorder, somatisation, general psychosocial functioning, and social and physical aggression in childhood were examined only in BPD studies. Attachment, impulsivity, experiential avoidance, disturbances in self representation, dissociation, comorbid oppositional defiant disorder, somatisation, general psychosocial functioning, social and physical aggression in childhood consistently predicted later BPD symptoms. Interestingly again, none of the BD at-risk reviews mentioned impulsivity although it is commonly found both in BD and BPD patients (di Giacomo et al., Reference di Giacomo, Aspesi, Fotiadou, Arntz, Aguglia, Barone and Zaccheroni2017; Pauselli, Verdolini, Santucci, Moretti, & Quartesan, Reference Pauselli, Verdolini, Santucci, Moretti and Quartesan2015; Reich, Zanarini, & Fitzmaurice, Reference Reich, Zanarini and Fitzmaurice2012).

Previous studies comparing BD and BPD patients showed that BPD patients had significantly more difficulties in interpersonal relationships, endorsed negative and distressing beliefs about themselves and their relationships, and had dysfunctional maternal relationships as compared to BD patients (Bayes et al., Reference Bayes, McClure, Fletcher, Román Ruiz del Moral, Hadzi-Pavlovic, Stevenson and Parker2015; Fletcher, Parker, Bayes, Paterson, & McClure, Reference Fletcher, Parker, Bayes, Paterson and McClure2014; Nilsson et al., Reference Nilsson, Jørgensen, Straarup and Licht2010). Our findings also indicate that relational difficulties with the self and others, such as disturbances in self representation, negative experiences in current relationships and insecure attachment, are evident in people with BPD features. Conflictive interpersonal relationships could distinguish BPD from BD (Massó Rodriguez et al., Reference Massó Rodriguez, Hogg, Gardoki-Souto, Valiente-Gómez, Trabsa, Mosquera and Amann2021). However, to be able to support this, these factors should also be studied in BD at-risk populations.

Relatively less evidence has accumulated about precursors related to the BPD development. The reason might be ascribed to the fact that the BPD phenotype is less clearly identified compared to the BD prodromal phase, although its underlying dimensions are evident in the reviews included in this study. This might be attributable to the short follow-up periods and not integrating contemporary methods for defining biological, psychological, and social precursor signs for the development of BPD (Chanen & Kaess, Reference Chanen and Kaess2011). Staging models, like in BD or psychosis, could be utilised to help predict the course of prognosis with external validation through biomarkers (Hutsebaut & Aleva, Reference Hutsebaut and Aleva2021; Videler, Hutsebaut, Schulkens, Sobczak, & van Alphen, Reference Videler, Hutsebaut, Schulkens, Sobczak and van Alphen2019). However, early stages of most of these symptoms are non-specific and overlap with other disorders (Berk et al., Reference Berk, Post, Ratheesh, Gliddon, Singh, Vieta and Dodd2017).

Most of the precursors and vulnerability factors evident in the reviews were shared in both disorders, but some factors were either more evident in BD at-risk or BPD at-risk or they differed in phenomenological aspects. For example, BD at-risk patients had decreased need for sleep, hypersomnia, low social rhythm regularity and high energy whereas BPD patients had chronic nightmares and it was mediated by emotional and behavioural problems. BD at-risk patients showed ‘bipolar depression’ rather than unipolar depression, but in emerging BPD the course was unipolar depression. In BPD at-risk, there was risk of self-harm, but it was not stable after post-hospitalisation. As DSM criteria state that BPD traits are chronic and pervasive (American Psychiatric Association, 2013), the nature of BPD as a personality disorder thereby is doubtful. Further, previous research has observed similar frequency in self-harm in BD patients (Joyce, Light, Rowe, Cloninger, & Kennedy, Reference Joyce, Light, Rowe, Cloninger and Kennedy2010). Therefore, although self-harm is evident only in BPD studies, it does not distinguish these disorders diagnostically. Importantly, subjects at-risk for attempting suicide usually approach it through searching information and news regarding self-harm and suicidal behaviours on the Internet (Solano et al., Reference Solano, Ustulin, Pizzorno, Vichi, Pompili, Serafini and Amore2016). Better insight and understanding of suicide and suicidal risk in these at-risk populations may ultimately help clinicians to adequately detect and prevent suicidal acts.

Whilst AI is transdiagnostic (Marwaha et al., Reference Marwaha, Gordon-Smith, Broome, Briley, Perry, Forty and Jones2016), it is also regarded as a shared feature in BD and BPD diagnosis. AI was evident in BD onset coexistent with baseline MDD, and it was defined as ‘having ups and downs’ whereas in BPD onset, it was part of negative affectivity, aggression, and impulsivity. Difficulties in relationships are a core BPD feature, manifested by idealisation and devaluation as well as by rejection sensitivity (Bayes et al., Reference Bayes, McClure, Fletcher, Román Ruiz del Moral, Hadzi-Pavlovic, Stevenson and Parker2015; Gunderson, Reference Gunderson2007). Considering the findings, they are in line with the previous cross-diagnostic studies. Saunders, Goodwin, and Rogers (Reference Saunders, Goodwin and Rogers2015) reported that patients with BPD had higher negative affect, impulsivity, aggression and reduced cooperative relationships. Likewise, Henry et al. (Reference Henry, Mitropoulou, New, Koenigsberg, Silverman and Siever2001) suggested that BPD is not simply an attenuated subgroup of affective disorders and that it could be distinguished from BD on the basis of temperament and character. Additionally, the valence, frequency and nature of mood/affect regulation or mood swings is key to both BD and BPD, and likely especially as the conditions are developing (Marwaha et al., Reference Marwaha, He, Broome, Singh, Scott, Eyden and Wolke2014). It was therefore surprising that this aspect of psychopathology has not been comprehensively assessed in people with at-risk conditions. Indeed, this is one way that the conditions could be distinguished. Advancing this field will require future comparative studies of affect/mood regulation in young people with emerging BD v. BPD. The time scale of the mood fluctuations can be a useful marker in clinical practice to differentiate BD and BPD in at-risk asymptomatic periods.

Childhood adversity was evident in both disorders (e.g. Palmier-Claus, Berry, Bucci, Mansell, and Varese, Reference Palmier-Claus, Berry, Bucci, Mansell and Varese2016; Ratheesh et al., Reference Ratheesh, Davey, Hetrick, Alvarez-Jimenez, Voutier, Bechdolf and Cotton2017; Skabeikyte and Barkauskiene, Reference Skabeikyte and Barkauskiene2021; Stepp et al., Reference Stepp, Lazarus and Byrd2016; Winsper et al., Reference Winsper, Marwaha, Lereya, Thompson, Eyden and Singh2016b). However, the evidence was much scarcer and sparser in BD studies. For example, apart from childhood sexual, physical, and verbal abuse and neglect, peer victimisation and abuse in romantic relationships were also evident in BPD. These findings are consistent with the previous literature stating that there is a higher likelihood of experiencing childhood adversity in BPD patients compared to BD (Afifi et al., Reference Afifi, Mather, Boman, Fleisher, Enns, MacMillan and Sareen2011; Cotter, Kaess, & Yung, Reference Cotter, Kaess and Yung2014). These adverse experiences might be the reason why BPD patients tend show higher aggressiveness and anger in mood shifts compared to BD patients.

In line with the recent research on the circadian rest-activity patterns in BD and BPD patients (McGowan, Goodwin, Bilderbeck, & Saunders, Reference McGowan, Goodwin, Bilderbeck and Saunders2019), sleep disturbances and difficulty falling asleep were common to both disorders. In BPD studies, chronic nightmares were significantly predictive of the onset whereas in BD, participants had decreased need of sleep and it was part of hypomanic symptoms. Vöhringer et al. (Reference Vöhringer, Barroilhet, Alvear, Medina, Espinosa, Alexandrovich and Ghaemi2016) too indicated that decreased need for sleep was part of manic symptoms and were specific to BD and not to BPD patients.

Comorbid SUD, anxiety disorders, psychotic symptoms, ADHD were common to both disorder onsets. In BD studies comorbid generalised anxiety disorder and social phobia and ADHD with and without baseline comorbid conduct disorder predicted BD onset whereas in BPD, ADHD and OCD predicted BPD. Further, psychotic symptoms in BD at-risk studies were most often linked to affective states which is in line with previous research (Bassett, Reference Bassett2012). However, the nature of the psychotic symptoms in BPD at-risk studies were not evident. Temperamental dimensions were also evident in both. Higher levels of activity and poor psychosocial functioning were common to both, but in BD onset daydreaming, cyclothymia, and temperamental instability during MDD episodes were predictors of transition. Additionally, sensitivity, hyper alertness, excessive talk or talking too loudly, somatic complaints, and impaired role in school predicted conversion to BD. In BPD studies, on the contrary, higher levels of emotionality, low levels of sociability and shyness predicted BPD symptoms. These traits again might be attributable to the fact that BPD patients having more conflictive interpersonal relationships (MacKinnon & Pies, Reference MacKinnon and Pies2006).

Depression was also predictive of BD onset and later BPD symptoms although most of the studies pertained to BD at-risk reviews. In BD at-risk studies, depressive episodes or MDD, chronicity, severity, age at onset, psychomotor retardation and frequency of depression predicted BD transition. In emerging BPD studies, only early onset of depression was related to later BPD symptoms. In BD at-risk studies, there is also coexistence of atypical depressive symptoms that are considered to be ‘bipolar depression’ and distinct in phenomenology from unipolar depression such as pathological guilt, cyclothymia, mood lability, psychotic symptoms, and subthreshold hypomania (Berk et al., Reference Berk, Conus, Lucas, Hallam, Malhi, Dodd, Yatham and McGorry2007, Reference Berk, Hallam, Malhi, Henry, Hasty, Macneil and McGorry2010). Detailed studies about depressive states in emerging BPD populations are urgently needed to be able to understand whether they can be distinguished based on the depressive symptomatology.

Family history of BD, although the results were inconsistent, was the prominent predictor of BD conversion compared to family history of depression or any affective disorders. For BPD, apart from maternal BPD symptoms (Winsper et al., Reference Winsper, Lereya, Marwaha, Thompson, Eyden and Singh2016a), paternal SUD, family history of psychiatric hospitalisation, and maternal psychopathology were significantly associated with BPD. Consistent with the previous research the family history of BD might be a prominent distinguishing feature when comparing BD and BPD (Galione & Zimmerman, Reference Galione and Zimmerman2010; Mitchell, Goodwin, Johnson, & Hirschfeld, Reference Mitchell, Goodwin, Johnson and Hirschfeld2008). However, there is paucity of research pertaining to BPD. Further, despite existing family history of BD data might support the conclusion that BD is highly heritable and unrelated to BPD, no studies have examined the familial relationship of BPD traits and conversion to BD or vice versa.

Our review has strengths. We utilised systematic search procedures to reduce risk of bias and ensure comprehensive coverage of the current literature. Inter-rater reliability was consistent with no requirement for arbitration regarding inclusion of SRs and MAs. However, several limitations of the current findings here should be considered when interpreting the results. First, we only included relevant prospective studies from the SRs and excluded primary studies with any other designs. This inhibited synthesising the articles as a whole and reporting the pooled results from eligible MA's. Second, the evidence was limited by the data that included SRs and MAs provided and some relevant prospective studies were inevitably missed. Third, there were many non-systematic literature reviews including prospective studies that the reviews we included missed out. For example, Hartmann, Nelson, Ratheesh, Treen, & McGorry's (Reference Hartmann, Nelson, Ratheesh, Treen and McGorry2018) scoping review, they provided additional evidence for family history of BD, subthreshold depression and hypomania, sleep disturbance, mood lability and later BD conversion. They also provided data for impulsivity and fun-seeking which was not investigated by the reviews included here. Fourth, we were not able to conduct an MA due to the substantial methodological and clinical heterogeneity with respect to cohort characteristics such as study design and sample size among primary studies included in the reviews. Further, not being able to pool the data precluded definitively clarifying the timing and duration of the precursors, notwithstanding the heterogeneity in at-risk populations (Radua et al., Reference Radua, Ramella-Cravaro, Ioannidis, Reichenberg, Phiphopthatsanee, Amir and Fusar-Poli2018). Fifth, because of the short follow-up periods and small number of follow-up assessments in most of the included prospective studies, the validity and utility of these factors for predicting an early prodrome of BD and BPD remains unknown. If we do not know the actual starting point of the onset of the disorder, these and any other identified factors may indicate relapse or maintenance of the disorder (Stepp & Lazarus, Reference Stepp and Lazarus2017). Sixth, none of the reviews discussed the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of reported precursors, important aspects that may enable better assessment of clinical utility. Therefore, again a cautious interpretation of the findings as to their generalisability is necessary. Seventh, none of the studies mentioned sub-score analyses for the examined antecedents making it challenging to compare how the two disorders presented different patterns of the shared features. Eight, the majority of the BD at-risk reviews examined youth at genetic high risk. However, most genetically high-risk individuals do not develop BD. A combination of genetic and clinical risk factors is required to optimally predict conversion to BD (Keramatian et al., Reference Keramatian, Chakrabarty, Saraf and Yatham2021). Nineth, despite our comprehensive search, we identified relatively very few studies pertaining to the BPD onset.

In conclusion, although the findings of this review may lead to support the view of BD and BPD as two distinct disorders, there is scant evidence from existing studies to either indicate that BD and BPD are separate nosological entities or that BPD should be considered as an extension of BD disorders. In clinical practice, these differences can be subtle, especially between BPD and BD-II (Massó Rodriguez et al., Reference Massó Rodriguez, Hogg, Gardoki-Souto, Valiente-Gómez, Trabsa, Mosquera and Amann2021).

Whilst the comparative literature is in its infancy there are several implications from this meta-review. On an etio-pathological level, our findings corroborate the notion that there is a prodromal stage in BD and BPD. There are overlapping risk factors in the young people with at-risk BD and BPD, these being family history of psychopathology, AI, ADHD, anxiety disorders, depression, sleep disturbances, substance abuse, psychotic symptoms, suicidality, childhood adversity and temperament. However, there are risk factors specific to the at-risk BD and BPD states. Gender, differences in the white matter, changes in the amygdala, neural reward circuit dysfunctions, DBD, subsyndromal hypomania, cyclothymia or bipolar NOS, frequency and loading of affective symptoms, and antidepressant use were evident only in people with at-risk BD. Parenting behaviour/style, parent-child relationship quality, maternal characteristics, attachment, impulsivity, experiential avoidance, disturbances in self representation, dissociation, comorbid oppositional defiant disorder, comorbid conduct disorder, somatisation, general psychosocial functioning, and social and physical aggression in childhood were evident only in at-risk BPD. These factors could form the basis of initial prediction modelling approaches which could improve clinical staging and clinical interventions. Clinicians should be aware of the high degree of comorbid psychopathology in young people developing BD and BPD and should consider both conditions in young people presenting with one. From a transdiagnostic perspective, the current review may provide a benchmark for comparing the magnitude of association of these factors with other mental health disorders. The results can also substantially advance our ability to prognosticate the onset of BD and BPD in populations at-risk, who ultimately may benefit from preventative interventions.

To be able to reliably identify target populations with greater specificity, future research is required to increase our understanding of the development of BD and BPD onset and their complex interplay by conducting prospective studies which concurrently examine multiple measures including biological, environmental, psychosocial, and clinical factors in BD and BPD at-risk populations. Systematic longitudinal studies investigating genetically and clinically high-risk youths in a structured multifactorial approach can help us understand whether both these disorders belong to the affective spectrum or not as well as their development over time (e.g. Brietzke et al., Reference Brietzke, Mansur, Soczynska, Kapczinski, Bressan and McIntyre2012). Greater predictive validity could be provided by future research identifying potential BD and BPD biomarkers whilst charting these along the illness trajectory. It is also important that future research studies use consistent recruitment criteria to ensure that findings are comparable and generalisable to other studies as far as is practicable (Malhi et al., Reference Malhi, Morris, Hamilton, Outhred and Mannie2017).

Large, multilevel data sets will enable deep phenotyping and distinguish pathophysiological pathways (Phillips & Kendler, Reference Phillips and Kendler2021). For example, remote monitoring can complement symptom monitoring and capture signals more representative of the underlying pathophysiology of BD and BPD (Gillett et al., Reference Gillett, McGowan, Palmius, Bilderbeck, Goodwin and Saunders2021; Gillett & Saunders, Reference Gillett and Saunders2019). One of the ways to conduct remote monitoring is Experience Sampling Methodology (ESM). The temporal pattern in mood may be captured by ESM (Larson & Csikszentmihalyi, Reference Larson and Csikszentmihalyi2014). Researchers have widely used ESM to assess the temporal patterns of regulations of mood/affect in individuals with mood disorders as the method is more suited to capturing momentary temporal fluctuations in affect (e.g. Dubad, Elahi, and Marwaha, Reference Dubad, Elahi and Marwaha2021; Merikangas et al., Reference Merikangas, Swendsen, Hickie, Cui, Shou, Merikangas and Zipunnikov2019; Schwartz, Schultz, Reider, and Saunders, Reference Schwartz, Schultz, Reider and Saunders2016; Tsanas et al., Reference Tsanas, Saunders, Bilderbeck, Palmius, Osipov, Clifford and De Vos2016). Further, some types of ESM are not subject to recall biases as the studies do not rely on retrospective memory recall of events between assessments (Myin-Germeys et al., Reference Myin-Germeys, Oorschot, Collip, Lataster, Delespaul and Van Os2009). The data gained through could also identify new behavioural biomarkers which may lead to the identification of novel phenotypes in these disorders (Gillett & Saunders, Reference Gillett and Saunders2019). Additionally, identifying common criteria such as AI is easy but focusing on differential symptoms is a complex task (Massó Rodriguez et al., Reference Massó Rodriguez, Hogg, Gardoki-Souto, Valiente-Gómez, Trabsa, Mosquera and Amann2021). ESM could also be useful to be able to achieve this. These prospective studies may also help identifying a validated BPD prodrome criteria, despite previous resistance to the diagnosis of BPD in adolescents due to the fears of stigmatisation (Chanen, Reference Chanen2015; Laurenssen, Hutsebaut, Feenstra, Van Busschbach, & Luyten, Reference Laurenssen, Hutsebaut, Feenstra, Van Busschbach and Luyten2013; Stepp & Lazarus, Reference Stepp and Lazarus2017).

Making an accurate diagnosis of BD and BPD is further complicated by comorbidity with various other conditions such as ADHD and unipolar depression (Asherson et al., Reference Asherson, Young, Eich-Höchli, Moran, Porsdal and Deberdt2014; Mneimne, Fleeson, Arnold, & Furr, Reference Mneimne, Fleeson, Arnold and Furr2018). ADHD has been reported to coexist in around 20% of adult patients with BPD or BD (Asherson et al., Reference Asherson, Young, Eich-Höchli, Moran, Porsdal and Deberdt2014; Philipsen et al., Reference Philipsen, Feige, Hesslinger, Scheel, Ebert, Matthies and Lieb2009; Skirrow, Hosang, Farmer, & Asherson, Reference Skirrow, Hosang, Farmer and Asherson2012), while rates of co-occurrence between BPD and current major depressive disorder MDD or BD range from as low as 4% to as high as 48% (Mneimne et al., Reference Mneimne, Fleeson, Arnold and Furr2018). Since deficits in affect regulation such as AI are also strongly linked to the hyperactive/impulsivity symptoms of ADHD (Skirrow & Asherson, 2013) and unipolar depression (Balbuena, Bowen, Baetz, & Marwaha, Reference Balbuena, Bowen, Baetz and Marwaha2016), it is imperative to include these groups too for comparison to better understand the symptom profiles between at-risk BD and BPD.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291722003002.

Author contributions

B. D. and S. M. were responsible for the conception of the review. B. D. designed the study and wrote the protocol. B. D., S. M. and R. U. designed the search strategy in consultation with a psychology subject librarian. B. D. and N. A. completed the initial screening of articles, full-text review of articles, data extraction and quality assessments. B. D. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to and have approved the final manuscript.

Financial support

None.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

References

Afifi, T. O., Mather, A., Boman, J., Fleisher, W., Enns, M. W., MacMillan, H., … Sareen, J. (2011). Childhood adversity and personality disorders: Results from a nationally representative population-based study. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 45(6), 814822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.11.008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akiskal, H. S. (2004). Demystifying borderline personality: Critique of the concept and unorthodox reflections on its natural kinship with the bipolar spectrum. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 110(6), 401407. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2004.00461.x.Google ScholarPubMed
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asherson, P., Young, A. H., Eich-Höchli, D., Moran, P., Porsdal, V., & Deberdt, W. (2014). Differential diagnosis, comorbidity, and treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in relation to bipolar disorder or borderline personality disorder in adults. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 30(8), 16571672.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balbuena, L., Bowen, R., Baetz, M., & Marwaha, S. (2016). Mood instability and irritability as core symptoms of major depression: An exploration using Rasch analysis. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 7, 174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Bart, C. P., Titone, M. K., Ng, T. H., Nusslock, R., & Alloy, L. B. (2021). Neural reward circuit dysfunction as a risk factor for bipolar spectrum disorders and substance use disorders: A review and integration. Clinical Psychology Review, 87, 102035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102035.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baryshnikov, I., Aaltonen, K., Koivisto, M., Näätänen, P., Karpov, B., Melartin, T., … Isometsä, E. (2015). Differences and overlap in self-reported symptoms of bipolar disorder and borderline personality disorder. European Psychiatry, 30(8), 914919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2015.08.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bassett, D. (2012). Borderline personality disorder and bipolar affective disorder. spectra or spectre? A review. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 46(4), 327339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867411435289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bassett, D., Mulder, R., Outhred, T., Hamilton, A., Morris, G., Das, P., … Malhi, G. S. (2017). Defining disorders with permeable borders: You say bipolar, I say borderline!. Bipolar Disorders, 19(5), 320323. https://doi.org/10.1111/bdi.12528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bayes, A. J., McClure, G., Fletcher, K., Román Ruiz del Moral, Y. E., Hadzi-Pavlovic, D., Stevenson, J. L., … Parker, G. B. (2015). Differentiating the bipolar disorders from borderline personality disorder. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 133(3), 187195. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.12509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benazzi, F. (2006). Borderline personality–bipolar spectrum relationship. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 30(1), 6874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2005.06.010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berk, M., Conus, P., Lucas, N., Hallam, K., Malhi, G. S., Dodd, S., Yatham, L. N., … McGorry, P. (2007). Setting the stage: From prodrome to treatment resistance in bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disorders, 9(7), 671678. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-5618.2007.00484.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berk, M., Hallam, K., Malhi, G. S., Henry, L., Hasty, M., Macneil, C., … McGorry, P. D. (2010). Evidence and implications for early intervention in bipolar disorder. Journal of Mental Health, 19(2), 113126. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638230903469111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berk, M., Post, R., Ratheesh, A., Gliddon, E., Singh, A., Vieta, E., … Dodd, S. (2017). Staging in bipolar disorder: From theoretical framework to clinical utility. World Psychiatry, 16(3), 236244. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonsall, M. B., Wallace-Hadrill, S. M., Geddes, J. R., Goodwin, G. M., & Holmes, E. A. (2012). Nonlinear time-series approaches in characterizing mood stability and mood instability in bipolar disorder. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279(1742), 36323632. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.1390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Brancati, G. E., Perugi, G., Milone, A., Masi, G., & Sesso, G. (2021). Development of bipolar disorder in patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Journal of Affective Disorders, 293, 186196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.06.033.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brietzke, E., Mansur, R. B., Soczynska, J. K., Kapczinski, F., Bressan, R. A., & McIntyre, R. S. (2012). Towards a multifactorial approach for prediction of bipolar disorder in at risk populations. Journal of Affective Disorders, 140(1), 8291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Cahn, A. J., Keramatian, K., Frysch, C., Yatham, L. N., & Chakrabarty, T. (2021). Longitudinal grey matter changes following first episode mania in bipolar I disorder: A systematic review. Journal of Affective Disorders, 291, 198208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.04.051.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chanen, A. M. (2015). Borderline personality disorder in young people: Are we there yet? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 71(8), 778791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chanen, A. M., & Kaess, M. (2011). Developmental pathways to borderline personality disorder. Current Psychiatry Reports, 14(1), 4553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-011-0242-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotter, J., Kaess, M., & Yung, A. R. (2014). Childhood trauma and functional disability in psychosis, bipolar disorder and borderline personality disorder: A review of the literature. Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine, 32(1), 2130. https://doi.org/10.1017/ipm.2014.74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*de Cardoso, T., Mondin, T. C., Azevedo, L. B., Toralles, L. M., & de Mattos Souza, L. D. (2018). Is suicide risk a predictor of diagnosis conversion to bipolar disorder? Psychiatry Research, 268, 473477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.08.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DelBello, M. P., & Geller, B. (2001). Review of studies of child and adolescent offspring of bipolar parents. Bipolar Disorders, 3(6), 325334. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-5618.2001.30607.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deltito, J., Martin, L., Riefkohl, J., Austria, B., Kissilenko, A., Corless, C., & Morse, P. (2001). Do patients with borderline personality disorder belong to the bipolar spectrum? Journal of Affective Disorders, 67(1–3), 221228. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-0327(01)00436-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
di Giacomo, E., Aspesi, F., Fotiadou, M., Arntz, A., Aguglia, E., Barone, L., … Zaccheroni, D. (2017). Unblending borderline personality and bipolar disorders. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 91, 9097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.03.006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubad, M., Elahi, F., & Marwaha, S. (2021). The clinical impacts of mobile mood-monitoring in young people with mental health problems: The MeMO study. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duffy, A., Carlson, G., Dubicka, B., & Hillegers, M. H. (2020). Pre-pubertal bipolar disorder: Origins and current status of the controversy. International Journal of Bipolar Disorders, 8(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40345-020-00185-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duffy, A., Doucette, S., Lewitzka, U., Alda, M., Hajek, T., & Grof, P. (2011). Findings from bipolar offspring studies: Methodology matters. Early Intervention in Psychiatry, 5(3), 181191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-7893.2011.00276.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eich, D., Gamma, A., Malti, T., Vogt Wehrli, M., Liebrenz, M., Seifritz, E., & Modestin, J. (2014). Temperamental differences between bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder, and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Some implications for their diagnostic validity. Journal of Affective Disorders, 169, 101104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2014.05.028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Faedda, G. L., Marangoni, C., Serra, G., Salvatore, P., Sani, G., Vázquez, G. H., … Koukopoulos, A. (2015). Precursors of bipolar disorders. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 76(5), 614624. https://doi.org/10.4088/jcp.13r08900.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fletcher, K., Parker, G., Bayes, A., Paterson, A., & McClure, G. (2014). Emotion regulation strategies in bipolar II disorder and borderline personality disorder: Differences and relationships with perceived parental style. Journal of Affective Disorders, 157, 5259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2014.01.001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fornaro, M., Orsolini, L., Marini, S., De Berardis, D., Perna, G., Valchera, A., … Stubbs, B. (2016). The prevalence and predictors of bipolar and borderline personality disorders comorbidity: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 195, 105118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.01.040.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galione, J., & Zimmerman, M. (2010). A comparison of depressed patients with and without borderline personality disorder: Implications for interpreting studies of the validity of the bipolar spectrum. Journal of Personality Disorders, 24(6), 763772. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2010.24.6.763.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Gibbs, M., Winsper, C., Marwaha, S., Gilbert, E., Broome, M., & Singh, S. P. (2015). Cannabis use and mania symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 171, 3947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2014.09.016.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillett, G., McGowan, N. M., Palmius, N., Bilderbeck, A. C., Goodwin, G. M., & Saunders, K. E. (2021). Digital communication biomarkers of mood and diagnosis in borderline personality disorder, bipolar disorder, and healthy control populations. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.610457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillett, G., & Saunders, K. E. (2019). Remote monitoring for understanding mechanisms and prediction in psychiatry. Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports, 6(2), 5156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40473-019-00176-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunderson, J. G. (2007). Disturbed relationships as a phenotype for borderline personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164(11), 16371640.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartmann, J. A., Nelson, B., Ratheesh, A., Treen, D., & McGorry, P. D. (2018). At-risk studies and clinical antecedents of psychosis, bipolar disorder and depression: A scoping review in the context of clinical staging. Psychological Medicine, 49(2), 177189. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291718001435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henry, C., Mitropoulou, V., New, A. S., Koenigsberg, H. W., Silverman, J., & Siever, L. J. (2001). Affective instability and impulsivity in borderline personality and bipolar II disorders: Similarities and differences. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 35(6), 307312. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3956(01)00038-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Hu, R., Stavish, C., Leibenluft, E., & Linke, J. O. (2020). White matter microstructure in individuals with and at risk for bipolar disorder: Evidence for an endophenotype from a voxel-based meta-analysis. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, 5(12), 11041113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2020.06.007.Google ScholarPubMed
Hutsebaut, J., & Aleva, A. (2021). The identification of a risk profile for young people with borderline personality pathology: A review of recent literature. Current Opinion in Psychology, 37, 1320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.06.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, H., & Sharma, V. (2009). Misdiagnosis of bipolar disorder as borderline personality disorder: Clinical and economic consequences. The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry, 10(4 Pt 2), 612615. https://doi.org/10.1080/15622970701816522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joyce, P. R., Light, K. J., Rowe, S. L., Cloninger, C. R., & Kennedy, M. A. (2010). Self-mutilation and suicide attempts: Relationships to bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder, temperament and character. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 44(3), 250257. https://doi.org/10.3109/00048670903487159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaess, M., Brunner, R., & Chanen, A. (2014). Borderline personality disorder in adolescence. Pediatrics, 134(4), 782793.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Keramatian, K., Chakrabarty, T., Saraf, G., & Yatham, L. N. (2021). Transitioning to bipolar disorder: A systematic review of prospective high-risk studies. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 35(1), 1021. https://doi.org/10.1097/yco.0000000000000762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, R., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The experience sampling method. In flow and the foundations of positive psychology. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
*Lau, P., Hawes, D. J., Hunt, C., Frankland, A., Roberts, G., & Mitchell, P. B. (2017). Prevalence of psychopathology in bipolar high-risk offspring and siblings: A meta-analysis. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 27(7), 823837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-017-1050-7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laurenssen, E. M. P., Hutsebaut, J., Feenstra, D. J., Van Busschbach, J. J., & Luyten, P. (2013). Diagnosis of personality disorders in adolescents: A study among psychologists. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 7(1), 14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacKinnon, D. F., & Pies, R. (2006). Affective instability as rapid cycling: Theoretical and clinical implications for borderline personality and bipolar spectrum disorders. Bipolar Disorders, 8(1), 114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-5618.2006.00283.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malhi, G. S., Moore, J., & McGuffin, P. (2000). The genetics of major depressive disorder. Current Psychiatry Reports, 2(2), 165169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-000-0062-y.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malhi, G. S., Morris, G., Hamilton, A., Outhred, T., & Mannie, Z. (2017). Is ‘early intervention’ in bipolar disorder what it claims to be? Bipolar Disorders, 19(8), 627636. https://doi.org/10.1111/bdi.12576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marwaha, S., Gordon-Smith, K., Broome, M., Briley, P. M., Perry, A., Forty, L., … Jones, L. (2016). Affective instability, childhood trauma and major affective disorders. Journal of Affective Disorders, 190, 764771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2015.11.024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marwaha, S., He, Z., Broome, M., Singh, S. P., Scott, J., Eyden, J., & Wolke, D. (2014). How is affective instability defined and measured? A systematic review. Psychological Medicine, 44(9), 17931808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massó Rodriguez, A., Hogg, B., Gardoki-Souto, I., Valiente-Gómez, A., Trabsa, A., Mosquera, D., … Amann, B. L. (2021). Clinical features, neuropsychology and neuroimaging in bipolar and borderline personality disorder: A systematic review of cross-diagnostic studies. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.681876.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGlashan, T. H. (1983). The borderline syndrome. Archives of General Psychiatry, 40(12), 1319–1323. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1983.01790110061011.Google ScholarPubMed
McGowan, N. M., Goodwin, G. M., Bilderbeck, A. C., & Saunders, K. E. (2019). Circadian rest-activity patterns in bipolar disorder and borderline personality disorder. Translational Psychiatry, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-019-0526-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGuffin, P., Rijsdijk, F., Andrew, M., Sham, P., Katz, R., & Cardno, A. (2003). The heritability of bipolar affective disorder and the genetic relationship to unipolar depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60(5), 497–502. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.60.5.497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merikangas, K. R., Swendsen, J., Hickie, I. B., Cui, L., Shou, H., Merikangas, A. K., … Zipunnikov, V. (2019). Real-time mobile monitoring of the dynamic associations among motor activity, energy, mood, and sleep in adults with bipolar disorder. JAMA Psychiatry, 76(2), 190198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, P. B., Goodwin, G. M., Johnson, G. F., & Hirschfeld, R. M. A. (2008). Diagnostic guidelines for bipolar depression: A probabilistic approach. Bipolar Disorders, 10(1p2), 144152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-5618.2007.00559.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mneimne, M., Fleeson, W., Arnold, E. M., & Furr, R. M. (2018). Differentiating the everyday emotion dynamics of borderline personality disorder from major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 9(2), 192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., … Stewart, L. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myin-Germeys, I., Oorschot, M., Collip, D., Lataster, J., Delespaul, P., & Van Os, J. (2009). Experience sampling research in psychopathology: Opening the black box of daily life. Psychological Medicine, 39(9), 15331547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Narayan, A. J., Allen, T. A., Cullen, K. R., & Klimes-Dougan, B. (2013). Disturbances in reality testing as markers of risk in offspring of parents with bipolar disorder: A systematic review from a developmental psychopathology perspective. Bipolar Disorders, 15(7), 723740. https://doi.org/10.1111/bdi.12115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nilsson, A. K., Jørgensen, C. R., Straarup, K. N., & Licht, R. W. (2010). Severity of affective temperament and maladaptive self-schemas differentiate borderline patients, bipolar patients, and controls. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 51(5), 486491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2010.02.006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … Moher, D. (2021). The Prisma 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. International Journal of Surgery, 88, 105906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Palmier-Claus, J. E., Berry, K., Bucci, S., Mansell, W., & Varese, F. (2016). Relationship between childhood adversity and bipolar affective disorder: Systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 209(6), 454459. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.115.179655.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Pancheri, C., Verdolini, N., Pacchiarotti, I., Samalin, L., Delle Chiaie, R., Biondi, M., … Murru, A. (2019). A systematic review on sleep alterations anticipating the onset of bipolar disorder. European Psychiatry, 58, 4553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2019.02.003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paris, J. (2004). Borderline or bipolar? Distinguishing borderline personality disorder from bipolar Spectrum disorders. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 12(3), 140145. https://doi.org/10.1080/10673220490472373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paris, J., & Black, D. W. (2015). Borderline personality disorder and bipolar disorder. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 203(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1097/nmd.0000000000000225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pauselli, L., Verdolini, N., Santucci, A., Moretti, P., & Quartesan, R. (2015). Bipolar and borderline personality disorders: A descriptive comparison of psychopathological aspects in patients discharged from an Italian inpatient unit using PANSS and BPRS. Psychiatria Danubina, 27, 170176.Google ScholarPubMed
Perez-Rodriguez, M. M., Bulbena-Cabré, A., Bassir Nia, A., Zipursky, G., Goodman, M., & New, A. S. (2018). The neurobiology of borderline personality disorder. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 41(4), 633650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psc.2018.07.012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Philipsen, A., Feige, B., Hesslinger, B., Scheel, C., Ebert, D., Matthies, S., … Lieb, K. (2009). Borderline typical symptoms in adult patients with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders, 1(1), 1118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, M. L., & Kendler, K. S. (2021). Three important considerations for studies examining pathophysiological pathways in psychiatric illness. JAMA Psychiatry, 78(7), 697. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pieper, D., Antoine, S.-L., Mathes, T., Neugebauer, E. A. M., & Eikermann, M. (2014). Systematic review finds overlapping reviews were not mentioned in every other overview. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(4), 368375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.11.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pompili, M., Girardi, P., Ruberto, A., & Tatarelli, R. (2005). Suicide in borderline personality disorder: A meta-analysis. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 59(5), 319324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pompili, M., Gonda, X., Serafini, G., Innamorati, M., Sher, L., Amore, M., … Girardi, P. (2013). Epidemiology of suicide in bipolar disorders: A systematic review of the literature. Bipolar Disorders, 15(5), 457490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prousali, E., Haidich, A. B., Fontalis, A., Ziakas, N., Brazitikos, P., & Mataftsi, A. (2019). Efficacy and safety of interventions to control myopia progression in children: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. BMC Ophthalmology, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-019-1112-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radua, J., Ramella-Cravaro, V., Ioannidis, J. P., Reichenberg, A., Phiphopthatsanee, N., Amir, T., … Fusar-Poli, P. (2018). What causes psychosis? An umbrella review of risk and protective factors. World Psychiatry, 17(1), 4966.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Rasic, D., Hajek, T., Alda, M., & Uher, R. (2013). Risk of mental illness in offspring of parents with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder: A meta-analysis of family high-risk studies. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 40(1), 2838. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbt114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Ratheesh, A., Davey, C., Hetrick, S., Alvarez-Jimenez, M., Voutier, C., Bechdolf, A., … Cotton, S. M. (2017). A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective transition from major depression to bipolar disorder. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 135(4), 273284. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.12686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reich, D. B., Zanarini, M. C., & Fitzmaurice, G. (2012). Affective lability in bipolar disorder and borderline personality disorder. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 53(3), 230237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2011.04.003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renaud, S., Corbalan, F., & Beaulieu, S. (2012). Differential diagnosis of bipolar affective disorder type II and borderline personality disorder: Analysis of the affective dimension. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 53(7), 952961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2012.03.004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Ritter, P. S., Marx, C., Bauer, M., Lepold, K., & Pfennig, A. (2011). The role of disturbed sleep in the early recognition of bipolar disorder: A systematic review. Bipolar Disorders, 13(3), 227237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-5618.2011.00917.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruggero, C. J., Zimmerman, M., Chelminski, I., & Young, D. (2010). Borderline personality disorder and the misdiagnosis of bipolar disorder. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 44(6), 405408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.09.011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanches, M. (2019). The limits between bipolar disorder and borderline personality disorder: A review of the evidence. Diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 7(3), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases7030049.Google ScholarPubMed
Saunders, K. E., Goodwin, G. M., & Rogers, R. D. (2015). Borderline personality disorder, but not EUTHYMIC bipolar disorder, is associated with a failure to sustain reciprocal cooperative behaviour: Implications for spectrum models of mood disorders. Psychological Medicine, 45(8), 15911600. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291714002475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S., Schultz, S., Reider, A., & Saunders, E. F. (2016). Daily mood monitoring of symptoms using smartphones in bipolar disorder: A pilot study assessing the feasibility of ecological momentary assessment. Journal of Affective Disorders, 191, 8893.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Scott, J., Etain, B., Miklowitz, D., Crouse, J. J., Carpenter, J., Marwaha, S., … Hickie, I. (2022). A systematic review and meta-analysis of sleep and circadian rhythms disturbances in individuals at high-risk of developing or with early onset of bipolar disorders. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 135, 104585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Scott, J., Kallestad, H., Vedaa, O., Sivertsen, B., & Etain, B. (2021). Sleep disturbances and first onset of major mental disorders in adolescence and early adulthood: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 57, 101429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2021.101429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serafini, G., Pompili, M., Borgwardt, S., Houenou, J., Geoffroy, P. A., Jardri, R., … Amore, M. (2014). Brain changes in early-onset bipolar and unipolar depressive disorders: A systematic review in children and adolescents. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 23(11), 10231041.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shea, B. J., Grimshaw, J. M., Wells, G. A., Boers, M., Andersson, N., Hamel, C., … Bouter, L. M. (2007). Development of AMSTAR: A measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Skabeikyte, G., & Barkauskiene, R. (2021). A systematic review of the factors associated with the course of borderline personality disorder symptoms in adolescence. Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation, 8(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40479-021-00151-z.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skirrow, C., & Asherson, P. (2013). Emotional lability, comorbidity and impairment in adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders, 147(1–3), 80–86.Google Scholar
Skirrow, C., Hosang, G. M., Farmer, A. E., & Asherson, P. (2012). An update on the debated association between ADHD and bipolar disorder across the lifespan. Journal of Affective Disorders, 141(2–3), 143159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skjelstad, D. V., Malt, U. F., & Holte, A. (2010). Symptoms and signs of the initial PRODROME OF BIPOLAR DISORDERA systematic review. Journal of Affective Disorders, 126(1–2), 113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2009.10.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D. J., Muir, W. J., & Blackwood, D. H. (2004). Is borderline personality disorder part of the bipolar spectrum? Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 12(3), 133139. https://doi.org/10.1080/10673220490472346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soares, J. C., & Young, A. H. (2016). Bipolar disorder: Basic mechanisms and therapeutic implications (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Socada, J. L., Söderholm, J. J., Rosenström, T., Ekelund, J., & Isometsä, E. (2021). Presence and overlap of bipolar symptoms and borderline features during major depressive episodes. Journal of Affective Disorders, 280, 467477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.11.043.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solano, P., Ustulin, M., Pizzorno, E., Vichi, M., Pompili, M., Serafini, G., & Amore, M. (2016). A Google-based approach for monitoring suicide risk. Psychiatry Research, 246, 581586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stepp, S. D., & Lazarus, S. A. (2017). Identifying a borderline personality disorder prodrome: Implications for community screening. Personality and Mental Health, 11(3), 195205. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Stepp, S. D., Lazarus, S. A., & Byrd, A. L. (2016). A systematic review of risk factors prospectively associated with borderline personality disorder: Taking stock and moving forward. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 7(4), 316323. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stone, M. H. (2006). Relationship of borderline personality disorder and bipolar disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163(7), 11261128. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.2006.163.7.1126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swann, A. C., Pazzaglia, P., Nicholls, A., Dougherty, D. M., & Moeller, F. G. (2003). Impulsivity and phase of illness in bipolar disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders, 73(1–2), 105111. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-0327(02)00328-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsanas, A., Saunders, K. E. A., Bilderbeck, A. C., Palmius, N., Osipov, M., Clifford, G. D., … De Vos, M. (2016). Daily longitudinal self-monitoring of mood variability in bipolar disorder and borderline personality disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders, 205, 225233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vandeleur, C. L., Merikangas, K. R., Strippoli, M.-P. F., Castelao, E., & Preisig, M. (2013). Specificity of psychosis, mania and major depression in a contemporary family study. Molecular Psychiatry, 19(2), 209213. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2013.132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vöhringer, P. A., Barroilhet, S. A., Alvear, K., Medina, S., Espinosa, C., Alexandrovich, K., … Ghaemi, S. N. (2016). The international mood network (IMN) nosology project: Differentiating borderline personality from bipolar illness. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 134(6), 504510. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.12643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Videler, A. C., Hutsebaut, J., Schulkens, J. E., Sobczak, S., & van Alphen, S. P. (2019). A life span perspective on borderline personality disorder. Current Psychiatry Reports, 21(7). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-019-1040-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, S. T., & Stanley, B. (2007). Comparing impulsiveness, hostility, and depression in borderline personality disorder and bipolar II disorder. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 68(10), 15331539. https://doi.org/10.4088/jcp.v68n1010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Winsper, C., Lereya, S. T., Marwaha, S., Thompson, A., Eyden, J., & Singh, S. P. (2016a). The aetiological and psychopathological validity of borderline personality disorder in youth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 44, 1324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.12.001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Winsper, C., Marwaha, S., Lereya, S. T., Thompson, A., Eyden, J., & Singh, S. P. (2016b). A systematic review of the neurobiological underpinnings of borderline personality disorder (BPD) in childhood and adolescence. Reviews in the Neurosciences, 27(8), 827847. https://doi.org/10.1515/revneuro-2016-0026.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Winsper, C., Tang, N. K. Y., Marwaha, S., Lereya, S. T., Gibbs, M., Thompson, A., & Singh, S. P. (2017). The sleep phenotype of borderline personality disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 73, 4867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.12.008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization. (2015). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, 10th revision, fifth edition, 2016. World Health Organization.Google Scholar
Zanarini, M. C., Frankenburg, F. R., Hennen, J., Reich, D. B., & Silk, K. R. (2005). The McLean study of adult development (MSAD): Overview and implications of the first six years of prospective follow-up. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19(5), 505523. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2005.19.5.505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmerman, M., Martinez, J., Young, D., Chelminski, I., Morgan, T. A., & Dalrymple, K. (2014). Comorbid bipolar disorder and borderline personality disorder and history of suicide attempts. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28(3), 358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmerman, M., & Morgan, T. A. (2013a). Problematic boundaries in the diagnosis of bipolar disorder: The interface with borderline personality disorder. Current Psychiatry Reports, 15(12). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-013-0422-z.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmerman, M., & Morgan, T. A. (2013b). The relationship between borderline personality disorder and bipolar disorder. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 15(2), 155169. https://doi.org/10.31887/dcns.2013.15.2/mzimmerman.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmerman, M., Ruggero, C. J., Chelminski, I., & Young, D. (2008). Is bipolar disorder overdiagnosed? The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 69(6), 935940. https://doi.org/10.4088/jcp.v69n0608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmerman, M., Ruggero, C. J., Chelminski, I., & Young, D. (2009). Psychiatric diagnoses in patients previously overdiagnozed with bipolar disorder. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 71(1), 2631. https://doi.org/10.4088/jcp.08m04633.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Flowchart of main search strategy and article selection for systematic review of review.

Figure 1

Table 1. Similarities and differences in shared factors in emerging bipolar disorder and borderline personality disorder

Supplementary material: File

Durdurak et al. supplementary material

Durdurak et al. supplementary material

Download Durdurak et al. supplementary material(File)
File 209.9 KB