Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:51:28.072Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sexual Offences Act – issues where both individuals lack capacity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2011

Psychiatrists, especially those working with people with intellectual disabilities, may encounter situations where two individuals who engage in sexual contact both lack capacity. It may be that the contact is consensual, but it could be argued that the individuals are committing an offence, as both parties lack capacity. However, to construe the act as an offence would be tantamount to asserting that individuals lacking capacity should not engage in sexual contact, and this could be seen as an infringement of their human rights.

There is no simple answer to such a situation. The sexual contact might be grounds for initiating safeguarding procedures if there is a power imbalance between the concerned persons. Where the act is consensual, clinicians are faced with a dilemma and need to balance the patients’ autonomy and rights against their professional duty of care to protect patients. A best interests meeting might help to resolve the issues and arrive at a consensus of opinion.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.