Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:54:27.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Opportunities for falls prevention in older adults with mild cognitive impairment

Commentary on “Cognitive and physical declines and falls in older people with and without mild cognitive impairment: a 7-year longitudinal study” by Chantanachai et al.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2023

Susan W. Hunter*
Affiliation:
School of Physical Therapy, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada

Abstract

Type
Commentary
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Psychogeriatric Association

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is considered a transitional state between normal cognitive changes associated with aging and dementia (Chen et al., Reference Chen, Liang, Li, Yang, Wang and Shi2021). MCI is defined by subjective cognitive complaints and measurable cognitive deficits which are not normal for the age of the person, preserved normal activities of daily living, and the absence of dementia (Winblad et al., Reference Winblad2004). The prevalence of MCI across geographic regions has been estimated at 5.9% and increases with age but is unaffected by sex (Sachdev et al., Reference Sachdev2015). The trajectory of cognitive function over time for people diagnosed with MCI can vary with some people progressing to dementia, some reverting to normal cognition, and a third group that do not show progression (Ganguli et al., Reference Ganguli2011; Petersen et al., Reference Petersen2009; Sachdev et al., Reference Sachdev2013).

Cognitive impairment is associated with an increased risk of falls in older adults (Muir et al., Reference Muir, Gopaul and Montero Odasso2012). The occurrence of falls among people with MCI is increased compared to the cognitively healthy (Montero-Odasso and Speechley, Reference Montero-Odasso and Speechley2018) and it has been estimated at least 40% will fall once each year (Chantanachai et al., Reference Chantanachai2022). The recent world guidelines for falls prevention recommend older adults without a diagnosis of cognitive impairment should be screened for cognitive disorders including executive function (Montero-odasso et al., Reference Montero-odasso2022). The assessment of cognitive status has also been identified as an important factor for promoting healthy aging in older adults (Scelzo, Reference Scelzo2021). Additionally, the screening for cognitive function allows the opportunity to monitor people at high risk for progression to dementia and associated adverse outcomes such as falls (Ramakers and Verhey, Reference Ramakers and Verhey2022). Physical function changes have been found among people with MCI that increase the risk of falls, specifically balance impairment, reduced mobility, and slow gait speed (Chantanachai et al., Reference Chantanachai, Sturnieks, Lord, Payne, Webster and Taylor2021). Among a sample comprised solely of people with a diagnosis of MCI, cognitive function was not associated with an increased risk of falling (Chantanachai et al., Reference Chantanachai2022). As cognitive function can change over time for MCI, the relationship between the different trajectories of cognitive function in MCI to the incidence of falls has not been disentangled in the literature up to now.

The paper by Chantanachai et al. (Reference Chantanachai2023) has evaluated changes in cognitive and physical function and falls in a sample of older people with and without MCI. Cognitive function was evaluated with measures of global cognitive function, processing speed, and executive function. Physical function testing included the Timed Up and Go test and sensorimotor function using the Physiological Profile Assessment. The study followed a sample of 481 older adults for up to 6 years for changes in cognition and physical function and then followed them for a further 1 year to evaluate the relationship between those changes and the occurrence of falls. Importantly, the sample was divided into three groups for analysis: those with MCI at baseline and MCI or dementia at all follow-up assessment, people who fluctuated between normal and MCI over the follow-up, and people who were cognitively normal at baseline and throughout the duration of the study. There are three important findings from this study that address existing gaps in our understanding of falls in people with MCI.

The first finding was consistent with expectations, there was a difference in cognitive performance (lower cognitive performance in the MCI group for global cognitive function, processing speed, executive function) between the MCI and the cognitively normal group, and between the MCI and the cognitively fluctuating group. Additionally, the rate of decline of cognition over the follow-up duration was greater in the MCI group. The MCI group also had worse physical function at baseline compared to the cognitively normal group, but the rate of decline in physical function was similar across the three groups. Lastly, a greater decline in physical function in mobility was only associated with falls in the analysis of the whole sample. Greater cognitive decline in global cognitive function and sensorimotor function was associated with falls only in the cognitively normal group.

The study has several important findings for application into clinical practice. The most important clinical takeaway from this study is that all older adults (the cognitively healthy, and people with MCI and fluctuating cognitive status) should be offered fall prevention interventions that target improving and maintaining mobility. The study also clearly demonstrates the decrease in physical function in people with MCI compared to the cognitively healthy that presents early in the time course of the condition. While cognitive changes feature prominently in the diagnosis and awareness of MCI, the demonstration of the presence of changes in physical function highlights there is a role for rehabilitation intervention to maintain or regain function. Therefore, a comprehensive assessment of function is important to identify the presence and extent of deficits that can then inform the creation of an individualized rehabilitation program that includes exercise and education.

Additionally, the study highlights there is more rapid decline in cognition among people with MCI. Rehabilitation professionals working with people with MCI need to be aware of the trajectory of changes within both domains to provide appropriate interventions. Therefore, interventions that target both physical and cognitive training have been shown to result in improvements in both domains for people with cognitive impairment (Gavelin et al., Reference Gavelin2021). This study has also provided important information to help guide short- and long-term goal planning for rehabilitation. Consistent with the recent global falls prevention guidelines (Montero-odasso et al., Reference Montero-odasso2022), it assists healthcare professional to provide appropriate education to people with MCI and their care providers related to expectations in function and falls prevention that can improve and maintain independent function, reduce care needs, and improve quality of life.

Conflict of interest

None.

References

Chantanachai, T., et al. (2023). Cognitive and physical declines and falls in older people with and without mild cognitive impairment: a 7-year longitudinal study. International Psychogeriatrics, 111. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610223000315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chantanachai, T., Sturnieks, D., Lord, S., Payne, N., Webster, L. and Taylor, M. (2021). Risk factors for falls in older people with cognitive impairment living in the community: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Research Reviews, 71, 101452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2021.101452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chantanachai, T., et al. (2022). Risk factors for falls in community-dwelling older people with mild cognitive impairment: a prospective one-year study. PeerJ, 10, e13484. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, Y. X., Liang, N., Li, X. L., Yang, S. H., Wang, Y. P. and Shi, N. N. (2021). Diagnosis and treatment for mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements. Frontiers in Neurology, 12, 719849. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.719849.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ganguli, M., et al. (2011). Outcomes of mild cognitive impairment by definition: a population study. Archives of Neurology, 68, 761767. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2011.101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gavelin, H. M., et al. (2021). Combined physical and cognitive training for older adults with and without cognitive impairment: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ageing Research Reviews, 66, 101232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2020.101232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montero-Odasso, M. and Speechley, M. (2018). Falls in cognitively impaired older adults: implications for risk assessment and prevention. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 66, 367375. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montero-odasso, M., et al. (2022). World guidelines for falls prevention and management for older adults: a global initiative. Age and Ageing, 51, 136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muir, S., Gopaul, K. and Montero Odasso, M. M. (2012). The role of cognitive impairment in fall risk among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Age and Ageing, 41, 299308. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afs012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petersen, R., et al. (2009). Mild cognitive impairment: ten years later. Archives of Neurology, 66, 14471454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramakers, I. H. G. B. and Verhey, F. R. J. (2022). Screening for neuropsychological assessment in the diagnostics of Neurocognitive disorder. International Psychogeriatrics, 34, 519521. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104161022200031X.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sachdev, P. S., et al. (2013). Factors predicting reversion from mild cognitive impairment to normal cognitive functioning: a population-based study. PLoS ONE, 8, 110. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059649.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sachdev, P. S., et al. (2015). The prevalence of mild cognitive impairment in diverse geographical and ethnocultural regions: the COSMIC Collaboration. PLoS ONE, 10, 119. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scelzo, A. (2021). Importance of good mental health assessment to promote healthy aging. International Psychogeriatrics, 34, 507509. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610221000594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winblad, B., et al. (2004). Mild cognitive impairment – beyond controversies, towards a consensus: report of the International Working Group on Mild Cognitive Impairment. Journal of Internal Medicine, 256, 240246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01380.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar