Details: correct details in manuscript
Abstract:
Currently reads:
Higher adherence to the MEDI-LITE was associated with higher nutritional quality scores, better overall nutrient profile as well as reduced environmental impact (land occupation: Q5 v. Q1: −35 %, greenhouse gas emissions: −15 % and cumulative energy demand: −17 %)
This should read:
Higher adherence to the MEDI-LITE was associated with higher nutritional quality scores, better overall nutrient profile as well as reduced environmental impact (land occupation: Q5 v. Q1: −35 %, greenhouse gas emissions: −40 % and cumulative energy demand: −17 %)
Results:
Currently reads:
LO (Q5 v. Q1: –35 %), GHGE (Q5 v. Q1: –15 %) and CED (Q5 v. Q1: –17 %) decreased across quintiles.
This should read:
LO (Q5 v. Q1: –35 %), GHGE (Q5 v. Q1: –40 %) and CED (Q5 v. Q1: –17 %) decreased across quintiles.
Discussion:
Currently reads:
In accordance with the literature, we observed that, in energy-adjusted models, higher adherence to the Mediterranean diet, as expressed by the MEDI-LITE, was associated with lower overall environmental impact (Q5 v. Q1: −15 %, −35, −17 %, for GHGE, LO and CED, respectively).
This should read:
In accordance with the literature, we observed that, in energy-adjusted models, higher adherence to the Mediterranean diet, as expressed by the MEDI-LITE, was associated with lower overall environmental impact (Q5 v. Q1: −40 %, −35%, −17 %, for GHGE, LO and CED, respectively).
