Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T05:24:05.131Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A prospective cohort study of starchy and non-starchy vegetable intake and mortality risk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2022

Tengfei Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China Key Laboratory of Population Health Across Life Cycle (Anhui Medical University), Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China, Hefei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China NHC Key Laboratory of Study on Abnormal Gametes and Reproductive Tract, Hefei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Population Health and Aristogenics/Key Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology of Anhui Higher Education Institutes, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China
Zhaohong Peng
Affiliation:
Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China
Hairong Li
Affiliation:
Huangpu District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China
Shaoxian Liang
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China
Mengfei Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China
Shu Ye
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China
Yong Huang
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China
Yu Zhu
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China
Xiude Li
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China
Danni Wang
Affiliation:
Teaching Center for Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Anhui, Medical University, Hefei, People’s Republic of China
Wanshui Yang*
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China Key Laboratory of Population Health Across Life Cycle (Anhui Medical University), Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China, Hefei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China NHC Key Laboratory of Study on Abnormal Gametes and Reproductive Tract, Hefei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Population Health and Aristogenics/Key Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology of Anhui Higher Education Institutes, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China
*
*Corresponding author: Wanshui Yang, email wanshuiyang@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Whether starchy and non-starchy vegetables have distinct impacts on health remains unknown. We prospectively investigated the intake of starchy and non-starchy vegetables in relation to mortality risk in a nationwide cohort. Diet was assessed using 24-h dietary recalls. Deaths were identified via the record linkage to the National Death Index. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % CI were calculated using Cox regression. During a median follow-up of 7·8 years, 4904 deaths were documented among 40 074 participants aged 18 years or older. Compared to those with no consumption, participants with daily consumption of ≥ 1 serving of non-starchy vegetables had a lower risk of mortality (HR = 0·76, 95 % CI 0·66, 0·88, Ptrend = 0·001). Dark-green and deep-yellow vegetables (HR = 0·79, 95 % CI 0·63, 0·99, Ptrend = 0·023) and other non-starchy vegetables (HR = 0·80, 95 % CI 0·70, 0·92, Ptrend = 0·004) showed similar results. Total starchy vegetable intake exhibited a marginally weak inverse association with mortality risk (HR = 0·89, 95 % CI 0·80, 1·00, Ptrend = 0·048), while potatoes showed a null association (HR = 0·93, 95 % CI 0·82, 1·06, Ptrend = 0·186). Restricted cubic spline analysis suggested a linear dose–response relationship between vegetable intake and death risk, with a plateau at over 300 and 200 g/d for total and non-starchy vegetables, respectively. Compared with starchy vegetables, non-starchy vegetables might be more beneficial to health, although both showed a protective association with mortality risk. The risk reduction in mortality plateaued at approximately 200 g/d for non-starchy vegetables and 300 g/d for total vegetables.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

In the USA, poor diet is estimated to be the leading cause of premature death, accounting for 529 299 deaths in 2016(Reference Mokdad and Ballestros1). However, a high intake of vegetables has long been recommended to prevent chronic diseases, including CVD(Reference Zhan, Liu and Cai2), cancer(Reference Wang, Li and Wang3) and diabetes(Reference Satija, Bhupathiraju and Rimm4).

Growing epidemiological evidence shows that different types of vegetables may have heterogeneous health impacts. Higher intake of non-starchy vegetables is associated with weight loss, while increased intake of starchy vegetables such as potatoes is associated with weight gain(Reference Bertoia, Mukamal and Overvad5). Additionally, starchy vegetables, especially potatoes, may have less beneficial or detrimental effects on multiple health outcomes, including incident CVD(Reference Borgi, Muraki and Satija6), type 2 diabetes(Reference Carter, Gray and Troughton7), chronic liver diseases(Reference Li, Zhang and Li8) and cancers of the breast(Reference Farvid, Chen and Michels9) and colon(Reference Wu, Yang and Vogtmann10). This may be partly due to the high glycaemic load(Reference Barclay, Petocz and McMillan-Price11) and poor processing or cooking methods(Reference Schwingshackl, Schwedhelm and Hoffmann12) of potatoes. However, current dietary guidelines generally treat all types of vegetables equally(1315), which necessitates investigating the possibly distinct health effects of starchy and non-starchy vegetables. To the best of our knowledge, however, only one study has separately assessed the associations between starchy and non-starchy vegetables and the risk of mortality: the Nurses’ Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, which consisted primarily of Caucasian health professionals(Reference Wang, Li and Bhupathiraju16). In addition, recommendations for vegetable intake differ globally. For example, the current recommendations for vegetable intake range from at least 200 g/d in the Netherlands(17) to 250 g/d in Finland and Norway(18), to 300 g/d in Belgium(19) and China(14), to 400–480 g/d in the USA(20) and to 600–800 g/d in Greece(15). Nonetheless, the results from recent meta-analyses and large-scale cohort studies(Reference Wang, Li and Bhupathiraju16,Reference Aune, Giovannucci and Boffetta21,Reference Wang, Ouyang and Liu22) suggested a non-linear relationship between the intake of vegetables and total mortality risk, with a plateau at approximately 3 servings of vegetables per day (approximately 240 g/d); intake above that level did not confer any additional benefits or showed a very minor risk reduction. Therefore, more evidence is needed to help guide recommendations regarding optimal vegetable intake.

Herein, we prospectively investigated the associations of the consumption of starchy and non-starchy vegetables and their subgroups with the risk of mortality in a nationally representative sample from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). We also evaluated the dose–response relationship between vegetable intake and mortality.

Materials and methods

Study population

Participants in this study were selected from the NHANES, which is a continuous, cross-sectional survey conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) to monitor the health of a nationally representative sample of approximately 5000 persons in the USA every year. Data from the survey are available to the public. The NHANES interview includes demographic, socio-economic, dietary and health-related questions. Details of the NHANES study design, study protocol and data collection approaches have previously been reported(23). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The NCHS Research Ethics Review Board approved the NHANES study protocols (Protocol #98-12; Protocol #2005-06; Protocol #2011-17).

Because the most recent mortality data were collected through 2015, we selected participants who completed at least the first 24-h dietary recall in the NHANES from 1999 to 2014. We excluded participants if they were younger than 18 years (n 34 735), had missing dietary data (n 5132) or implausible energy intake(Reference Yeh, Yuan and Ascherio24) (< 2510 or > 14 644 kJ/d for women and < 3347 or > 17 573 kJ/d for men, n 2100) or had no linked mortality data (n 50). A total of 40 074 eligible participants (20 984 women and 19 090 men) were included in the final analysis (online Supplementary Fig. 1).

Dietary assessment

Dietary data were collected using 24-h dietary recall. We used a multiple-pass method to enhance complete and accurate data collection and decrease the respondent burden(Reference Ahluwalia, Dwyer and Terry25). From 1999 to 2002 only, single 24-h dietary recall was performed in person at the NHANES Mobile Examination Center (MEC). After 2003, participants had two 24-h dietary recalls, with the second 24-h (Day 2) recall being performed by telephone 3–10 d after the first (Day 1) recall to obtain a more complete picture of the usual dietary habits. We used Day 1 dietary sampling weights to overcome the limitations, including the dietary interview-specific non-response, day of the week for dietary recalls, unequal probability of selection and oversampling(Reference Ahluwalia, Dwyer and Terry25).

The definitions of total vegetables and subgroups were based on the US Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Database for Dietary Studies (online Supplementary Table 1). Total non-starchy vegetables include dark-green vegetables (e.g. raw or cooked broccoli, romaine, and collards), deep-yellow vegetables (e.g. carrot, pumpkin, and winter squash) and other non-starchy vegetables (e.g. tomatoes and lettuce). Starchy vegetables included white potatoes (e.g. baked, boiled, mashed, scalloped and fried potatoes and potato chips) and other starchy vegetables (e.g. immature peas, lima beans and maize).

Assessments of covariates

Information on demographic and lifestyle factors, including age, sex, race/ethnicity, educational level, marital status, family income, physical activity and smoking, was collected using standardised questionnaires during household interviews. Body weight, height and alcohol intake were obtained in the MEC. The ratio of family income to poverty was used to measure family income. This ratio divides family income by the poverty thresholds accounting for family size and annual inflation. BMI was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in metres (kg/m2). Physical activity was expressed in metabolic equivalent tasks-hours/week. Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI-2015) scores were also calculated(Reference Krebs-Smith, Pannucci and Subar26). Histories of cancer, hypertension, diabetes and other CVD (excluding hypertension) were defined if individuals reported that they had ever been told by a healthcare professional that they had such diseases and/or took prescribed medications due to the diseases. Diabetes (a fasting plasma glucose level ≥ 126 mg/dl) and hypertension (a systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg or a diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg) were also identified through laboratory test or physical examination in the MEC(27).

Ascertainment of deaths

Deaths and causes of death were identified via record linkage to the National Death Index (NDI) through 31 December 2015. NDI has been proven to be a reliable and efficient utility for ascertainment of deaths in large epidemiological studies; over 98 % of deaths can be identified by this method(Reference Stampfer, Willett and Speizer28,Reference Rich-Edwards, Corsano and Stampfer29) .

Ethical approval

The NCHS approved the NHANES study protocol and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The Institutional Review Board at Anhui Medical University determined that this analysis used a public dataset, so human subjects’ approval was waived.

Statistical analysis

We calculated person-years from the date of the first diet assessment to the date of death or the end of follow-up (31 December 2015), whichever came first. Based on previous studies, we defined the standard serving size for all types of vegetables as 80 g and divided vegetable intake into three groups (i.e. 0, 0–1 and ≥ 1 servings/d)(Reference Wang, Li and Bhupathiraju16,Reference Agudo30) . Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % CI for deaths associated with intake of different types of vegetables, treating 0 servings/d as the reference group. The proportional hazards assumption was tested by including the interaction term between the intake of each vegetable and the follow-up time in the model. We also used plots of Schoenfeld residuals (data not shown) and found no evidence for violation of this assumption. Model 1 was adjusted for age, sex and total energy intake. Model 2 was further adjusted for race/ethnicity, education, marital status, ratio of family income to poverty, physical activity, smoking, alcohol drinking, BMI, diabetes, HEI-2015 and histories of hypertension, other CVD and cancer at baseline. Of note, starchy and non-starchy vegetables were mutually adjusted, dark-green and deep-yellow vegetables and other non-starchy vegetables were mutually adjusted and potatoes and other non-starchy vegetables were mutually adjusted in Model 2. To avoid overadjustment, the intake component of vegetables was removed from the HEI-2015. A missing-value indicator was created for the covariates with missing values in the models. A linear trend test was conducted by treating each exposure as a continuous variable in the models. We used restricted cubic splines with three knots at fixed percentiles (i.e. 5, 50 and 95 %) to evaluate the potential non-linear relationships between vegetable intake and death risk.

Subgroup analysis was conducted by age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, ratio of family income to poverty, smoking, marital status, alcohol drinking, physical activity, BMI and diabetes. To test the possible effect modification, we used the Wald test to examine whether the cross-product terms among these variables and exposures were statistically significant. In the secondary analysis, to minimise reverse causation from existing health conditions, we conducted a sensitivity analysis by excluding participants who died within 3 years after diet assessment. We also repeated the analyses after excluding participants with CVD, cancer or diabetes at baseline. All P values are two-sided at a type I error rate of 0·05. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc.).

Results

Characteristics of participants

After a median follow-up of 7·8 years among 40 074 participants aged 18–85 years (mean age, 47·3 years, (sd 19·4) years), we documented 4904 deaths. Potato and other non-starchy vegetable intakes contribute substantially to total vegetable intake, with proportions of energy from vegetables being 59 % for white potatoes, 29 % for other non-starchy vegetables, 9 % for other starchy vegetables and 3 % for both dark-green and deep-yellow vegetables (online Supplementary Fig. 2). Participants with higher consumption of starchy vegetables were more likely to be non-Hispanic black and have a history of other CVD. These trends were reversed for the non-starchy vegetables (Table 1). In addition, participants with higher consumption of total non-starchy vegetables were older and had higher income, education and physical activity and were more likely to be married and never smoke.

Table 1. Age-adjusted characteristics of participants according to individual vegetable intake in NHANES (1999–2014)*

(Mean values and standard deviations; numbers)

METS, metabolic equivalent tasks; NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

* Variables were adjusted for age except for age. Continuous variables were expressed as the mean (sd) if normally distributed. Categorical variables were expressed as proportions (%).

Vegetable consumption and mortality risk

Compared to those with no consumption, participants with daily consumption of 1 serving or more of total non-starchy vegetables had a lower mortality risk (HR = 0·76, 95 % CI 0·66, 0·88, P trend = 0·001) in the adjusted model (Table 2). For the same comparison, we observed similar inverse associations for dark-green and deep-yellow vegetables (HR = 0·79, 95 % CI 0·63, 0·99, P trend = 0·023) and other non-starchy vegetables (HR = 0·80, 95 % CI 0·70, 0·92, P trend = 0·004). There was a weak inverse association between total starchy vegetable intake and death risk with borderline significance (HR = 0·89, 95 % CI 0·80, 1·00, P trend = 0·048), whereas potato intake was not associated with the risk of mortality (HR = 0·93, 95 % CI 0·82, 1·06, P trend = 0·186).

Table 2. All-cause mortality according to starchy and non-starchy vegetable intake in NHANES (1999–2014)

(Hazard ratios and 95 % confidence intervals)

GED, general educational development; HR, hazard ratio; METS, metabolic equivalent tasks; NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

* Model 1 was adjusted for sex (male, female), age (18–45, 46–65, ≥ 66 years) and total energy intake (kcal/d, tertile).

Model 2 was further adjusted for race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic or other races), education (≤ 12th grade, high school graduate/GED or equivalent or more than high school), marital status (married, widowed/divorced/separated or never married), ratio of family income to poverty (< 1·30, 1·30–3·49 or ≥ 3·50), physical activity (< 8·3, 8·3–16·7 or > 16·7 METS-h/week), smoking (never smokers, former smokers or current smokers), drinking (never drinking, low to moderate drinking, heavy drinking), BMI (< 18·5, 18·5–24·9, 25·0–29·9 and ≥ 30·0), diabetes (no, yes), hypertension (no, yes), other CVD (no, yes), cancer (no, yes) and HEI-2015 (tertile). Of note, starchy and non-starchy vegetables were mutually adjusted, dark-green and deep-yellow vegetables and other non-starchy vegetables were mutually adjusted and potatoes and other non-starchy vegetables were mutually adjusted.

Linear trend test was conducted by treating each exposure as a continuous variable in the models.

Restricted cubic spline analysis did not support a non-linear association of intake of starchy or non-starchy vegetables with mortality risk (all non-linearity > 0·05). There seemed to be a plateau in the dose–response relationship between total vegetable intake and death risk, with a minimal risk of mortality observed at above 300 g for daily total vegetable intake. Similarly, participants would gain no further apparent benefit from increasing non-starchy vegetables over 200 g/d (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Dose–response relationship between total vegetables, total starchy vegetables, total non-starchy vegetables and all-cause mortality in NHANES (1999–2014)a. HR, hazard ratio; NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. a Adjusted for sex (male, female), age (18–45, 46–65, ≥ 66 years), total energy intake (kcal/d, tertile), race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic or other race), education (≤ 12th grade, high school graduate/GED or equivalent or more than high school), marital status (married, widowed/divorced/separated or never married), ratio of family income to poverty (< 1·30, 1·30–3·49 or ≥ 3·50), physical activity (< 8·3, 8·3–16·7 or > 16·7 METS-h/week), smoking (never smokers, former smokers or current smokers), drinking (never drinking, low to moderate drinking, heavy drinking), BMI (< 18·5, 18·5–24·9, 25·0–29·9 and ≥ 30·0), diabetes (no, yes), hypertension (no, yes), other CVD (no, yes), cancer (no, yes), HEI-2015 (tertile) and starchy and non-starchy vegetables were mutually adjusted. Of note, the dotted line represents the 95 % CI.

Secondary analysis

In the subgroup analysis, the inverse association between non-starchy vegetable intake and the risk of overall mortality appeared stronger in individuals under 65 years of age (HR per 1-sd increase = 0·84, 95 % CI 0·75, 0·93) than in those aged 65 years or older (HR per 1-sd increase = 0·96, 95 % CI 0·89, 1·03, P interaction = 0·028, Fig. 2). We did not find any differential associations by sex, race/ethnicity, education, ratio of family income to poverty, marital status, smoking, alcohol drinking, physical activity, BMI or history of diabetes.

Fig. 2. HR of all-cause mortality per 1-sd increase in total starchy vegetables and non-starchy vegetables by subgroups in NHANES (1999–2014)a. HR, hazard ratios; METS, metabolic equivalent tasks; NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. a Adjusted for sex (male, female), age (18–45, 46–65, ≥ 66 years), total energy intake (kcal/d, tertile), race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic or other race), education (≤ 12th grade, high school graduate/GED or equivalent, or more than high school), marital status (married, widowed/divorced/separated, or never married), ratio of family income to poverty (< 1·30, 1·30–3·49 or ≥ 3·50), physical activity (< 8·3, 8·3–16·7 or > 16·7 METS-h/week), smoking (never smokers, former smokers or current smokers), drinking (never drinking, low to moderate drinking, heavy drinking), BMI (< 18·5, 18·5–24·9, 25·0–29·9, and ≥ 30·0), diabetes (no, yes), hypertension (no, yes), other CVD (no, yes), cancer (no, yes), HEI-2015 (tertile) and starchy and non-starchy vegetables were mutually adjusted. Of note, each stratified variable was removed from the corresponding model. Light physical activity was defined as participants with physical activity less than 8·3 METS-h per week, and moderate and vigorous activity was defined as participants who had physical activity of 8·3 METS-h per week or more.

In the sensitivity analysis, the results were essentially unchanged after excluding participants who had a history of diabetes (n 636, 1·59 %), cancer (n 3018, 7·53 %) or major CVD (n 3156, 7·88 %) at baseline or excluding individuals (n 1308, 3·3 %) who died within 3 years after the baseline survey (online Supplementary Table 2).

Discussion

In this large prospective cohort study, we found that higher intakes of total non-starchy vegetables and their subgroups (i.e. dark-green and deep-yellow vegetables and other non-starchy vegetables) were associated with a lower risk of overall mortality among US adults. Intake of starchy vegetables, not including potato intake, showed a weak inverse association with the risk of mortality. In addition, the risk reduction in mortality plateaued at approximately 200 g/d for non-starchy vegetables and 300 g/d for total vegetable intake.

Our findings suggest that higher non-starchy vegetable intake was associated with a lower risk of mortality, which is in line with previous cohort studies(Reference Wang, Li and Bhupathiraju16,Reference Mori, Shimazu and Charvat31) . A prospective study consisting of US health professionals reported that non-starchy vegetable intake was inversely associated with overall mortality, but a null association of starchy vegetables with mortality was found(Reference Wang, Li and Bhupathiraju16). In another cohort study of Japanese participants, higher non-starchy vegetable intake was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality(Reference Mori, Shimazu and Charvat31). Several biological mechanisms might explain the beneficial effects of non-starchy vegetables on human health. First, dietary fibre in non-starchy vegetables has been described as promoting the production of SCFA, improving insulin resistance and assisting in lowering cholesterol(Reference Fuller, Beck and Salman32). In addition, dietary fibre has been shown to be beneficial to human health through its physiological effects in the gut, including acting as a prebiotic to selectively enrich beneficial gut bacteria(Reference Gong and Yang33). Second, non-starchy vegetables can reduce oxidative stress because they contain several antioxidant compounds and vitamins that may reduce the risk of vascular disease and cancer by scavenging reactive oxygen species and other free radicals and preventing the oxidation of DNA and lipids in arterial tissue(Reference Arts and Hollman34). Additionally, most antioxidant phytochemicals in starchy vegetables have also been found to have anti-inflammatory properties, such as resveratrol, anthocyanin and curcumin(Reference Costa, Garcia-Diaz and Jimenez35). Third, obesity is associated with low-grade systemic inflammation, significant adipose inflammation and insulin resistance, which may increase the risk of mortality and chronic diseases(Reference Koenen, Hill and Cohen36). However, a long-term follow-up cohort study in the USA revealed that increased consumption of non-starchy vegetables was inversely associated with weight change(Reference Bertoia, Mukamal and Cahill37).

We found a weak inverse association between total starchy vegetable intake and death risk, possibly because starchy vegetables provide important nutrients and bioactive compounds(Reference Nguyen, Chen and Lin38) such as carbohydrates, K, dietary fibre, vitamins, polyphenols and flavonoids. In accordance with our results, a recent study in Costa Rican adults found a significant inverse association between the consumption of starchy vegetables and fasting blood glucose(Reference Li, Wang and Ruiz-Narváez39); higher consumption of starchy vegetables during reproductive years decreased the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus during pregnancy among Tehranian women(Reference Goshtasebi, Hosseinpour-Niazi and Mirmiran40). Similarly, moderate starchy vegetable intake was inversely associated with all-cause mortality in the China Health and Nutrition Survey(Reference Chen, Jiao and Zhuang41).

Our results showed a null association between mortality and potato intake, which is consistent with the few existing studies(Reference Veronese, Stubbs and Noale42,Reference Moholdt and Nilsen43) . Although potatoes are rich in fibre, niacin, folate, vitamins and minerals, including K, Mg and Fe(Reference Anderson, Soeandy and Smith44), their high glycaemic load may raise glucose levels faster than non-starchy vegetables, leading to disruption of insulin homoeostasis and promotion of fat deposition(Reference Yu, Wesselius and Mehrkanoon45), all potentially important mechanisms in the development of major chronic diseases(Reference Barclay, Petocz and McMillan-Price11,Reference Borgi, Rimm and Willett46) . In this context, it is possible that the beneficial compounds in potatoes may compensate for the detrimental effect of high carbohydrate intake and therefore a higher glycaemic index(Reference Mazidi, Kengne and Banach47). On the other hand, different preparation methods of potatoes can lead to different health effects. For example, consumption of boiled potatoes was not associated with all-cause or CVD mortality in Norway(Reference Moholdt and Nilsen43), whereas two epidemiological studies reported that the consumption of fried potatoes was associated with a higher risk for CVD(Reference Schwingshackl, Schwedhelm and Hoffmann12) and overall mortality(Reference Veronese, Stubbs and Noale42), which might be due to the harmful chemical contaminants generated during heat processing(Reference Chen, Jiao and Zhuang41). Unfortunately, potatoes are eaten mainly in the form of French fries, potato chips and mashed potatoes in the USA(Reference Rai, Fung and Lu48), which are also part of the Western dietary pattern.

Restricted cubic spline analysis suggested that the risk reduction in mortality plateaued at approximately 200 g/d for non-starchy vegetables and 300 g/d for total vegetable intake. These results were partly consistent with the three meta-analyses(Reference Wang, Li and Bhupathiraju16,Reference Aune, Giovannucci and Boffetta21,Reference Wang, Ouyang and Liu22) showing a plateau at 3 servings/d (approximately 240 g/d) of total vegetable intake; intake above that level was not associated with further risk reductions(Reference Wang, Li and Bhupathiraju16,Reference Wang, Ouyang and Liu22) or showed a very minor risk reduction in mortality(Reference Aune, Giovannucci and Boffetta21). Similarly, the 2020–2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommend that adults consume 2–3 cup equivalents of vegetables per day(49). However, several dietary guidelines recommend higher daily intake levels. The Dietary Guidelines for Germany(13) and the Food Guide Pagoda for Chinese Residents(14) recommend 400 g of total vegetable intake per day. The recommended daily intake of vegetables in the Dietary Guide for Adults in Greece(15) is higher than 400 g.

We found that age may significantly modify the inverse association between non-starchy vegetable intake and the risk of overall mortality, with a stronger inverse association being observed among younger participants (i.e. under 65 years of age). The reasons for such significant effect modification remain unclear. A possible explanation is that ageing of the human body leads to a decrease in the number of nerve cells in the myenteric plexus, which affects digestive absorption, and degeneration of the small intestine villi in the elderly also leads to blunting of nutrient absorption(Reference Soenen, Rayner and Jones50). Alternatively, the results might be due to chance. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings and to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.

The strengths of our study include the use of a nationally representative sample of US adults, the large sample size and the prospective cohort design. However, several limitations should be noted. First, self-reported diet and other lifestyle factors from questionnaires have measurement errors, although we used several methods(Reference Ahluwalia, Dwyer and Terry25), including dietary sampling weight and a multiple-pass method, to reduce measurement error and to improve estimates of usual intake. In addition, dietary information was collected based on a single measurement at baseline, and participants may have changed their dietary habits during the follow-up. Second, although we adjusted for a wide range of risk factors, such as demographics, smoking and physical activity, the possibility of residual confounding cannot be totally ruled out. In addition, we were unable to consider cooking methods in the analysis, which may also lead to confounding bias. Third, despite a nationally representative sample in the current study, the findings may not be generalisable to other populations, such as Asian populations, given the differences in food composition and cooking/preparation methods across regions or countries.

In conclusion, a higher intake of non-starchy vegetables might be more beneficial to health than starchy vegetables, although both showed an inverse association with mortality risk. Our results do not support that potato intake is associated with a lower risk of death. The risk reduction in mortality plateaued at approximately 200 g/d for non-starchy vegetables and 300 g/d for total vegetable intake. These findings should be interpreted with caution and need to be validated in well-designed cohorts, given the single diet measurement using 24-h recalls.

Acknowledgements

This study uses data from the NHANES. We thank the NCHS, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for their financial support for data collection and analysis. We thank the study participants and staff.

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82073651), Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation (2008085MH262 and 2108085QH357), Anhui Provincial Education Department (gxyqZD2021099) and grants from Anhui Medical University (XJ201935, 2020lcxk033 and 2021xkjT007). The funding agency had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

T. Z., Z. P. and H. L. had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: W. Y. and T. Z. Acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data: all authors. Drafting of the manuscript: T. Z. and W. Y. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: all authors. Statistical analysis: T. Z., H. L. and S. L. Obtained funding: W. Y. Administrative, technical or material support: W. Y. Study supervision: W. Y.

The authors disclose no conflicts.

Supplementary material

For supplementary material referred to in this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114522003518

Footnotes

These authors contributed equally as co-first authors for this article

References

Collaborators USBD, Mokdad, AH, Ballestros, K, et al. (2018) The state of US health, 1990–2016: burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors among US states. JAMA 319, 14441472.Google ScholarPubMed
Zhan, J, Liu, YJ, Cai, LB, et al. (2017) Fruit and vegetable consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 57, 16501663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Y, Li, F, Wang, Z, et al. (2015) Fruit and vegetable consumption and risk of lung cancer: a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Lung Cancer 88, 124130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Satija, A, Bhupathiraju, SN, Rimm, EB, et al. (2016) Plant-based dietary patterns and incidence of type 2 diabetes in US men and women: results from three prospective cohort studies. PLoS Med 13, e1002039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bertoia, ML, Mukamal, KJ, Overvad, K, et al. (2016) Abstract 39: estimated risk of coronary heart disease associated with the replacement of various foods with vegetables in two large prospective cohorts. Circulation 133, A39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgi, L, Muraki, I, Satija, A, et al. (2016) Fruit and vegetable consumption and the incidence of hypertension in three prospective cohort studies. Hypertension 67, 288293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carter, P, Gray, LJ, Troughton, J, et al. (2010) Fruit and vegetable intake and incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ (Clin Res Ed) 341, c4229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, X, Zhang, T, Li, H, et al. (2022) Associations between intake of starchy and non-starchy vegetables and risk of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis. Hepatol Int 16, 846857.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farvid, MS, Chen, WY, Michels, KB, et al. (2016) Fruit and vegetable consumption in adolescence and early adulthood and risk of breast cancer: population based cohort study. BMJ (Clin Res Ed) 353, i2343.Google ScholarPubMed
Wu, QJ, Yang, Y, Vogtmann, E, et al. (2013) Cruciferous vegetables intake and the risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Ann Oncol 24, 10791087.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barclay, AW, Petocz, P, McMillan-Price, J, et al. (2008) Glycemic index, glycemic load, and chronic disease risk--a meta-analysis of observational studies. Am J Clin Nutr 87, 627637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwingshackl, L, Schwedhelm, C, Hoffmann, G, et al. (2019) Potatoes and risk of chronic disease: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. Eur J Nutr 58, 22432251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
German Nutrition Society (2017) 10 Guidelines of the German Nutrition Society (DGE) for a Wholesome Diet. https://www.dge.de/ernaehrungspraxis/vollwertige-ernaehrung/10-regeln-der-dge/en/ (accessed May 2022).Google Scholar
The Chinese Nutrition Society (2022) The Food Guide Pagoda for Chinese Residents. http://dg.cnsoc.org/article/04/RMAbPdrjQ6CGWTwmo62hQg.html (accessed May 2022).Google Scholar
Hellenic Institute of Preventive Environmental and Occupational Medicine (2017) The Dietary Guide for Adults in Greece. http://www.diatrofikoiodigoi.gr/?Page=gia-enilikes (accessed May 2022).Google Scholar
Wang, DD, Li, Y, Bhupathiraju, SN, et al. (2021) Fruit and vegetable intake and mortality: results from 2 prospective cohort studies of US men and women and a meta-analysis of 26 cohort studies. Circulation 143, 16421654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Health Council of the Netherlands (2016) The 2015 Dutch Food-Based Dietary Guidelines. https://www.healthcouncil.nl/documents/advisory-reports/2015/11/04/dutch-dietary-guidelines-2015 (accessed May 2022).Google Scholar
Superior Health Council of Belgium (2019) Dietary Guidelines for The Belgian about Population. https://www.health.belgium.be/sites/default/files/uploads/fields/fpshealth_theme_file/20191011_shc-9284_fbdg_vweb.pdf (accessed May 2022).Google Scholar
Norwegian National Nutrition Council (2011) Dietary Recommendations to Improve Public Health and Prevent Chronic Diseases. https://helsedirektoratet.no/publikasjoner/kostrad-for-a-fremme-folkehelsen-og-forebygge-kroniske-sykdommer-metodologi-og-vitenskapelig-kunnskapsgrunnlag (accessed May 2022).Google Scholar
Aune, D, Giovannucci, E, Boffetta, P, et al. (2017) Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer and all-cause mortality-a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Int J Epidemiol 46, 10291056.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, X, Ouyang, Y, Liu, J, et al. (2014) Fruit and vegetable consumption and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. BMJ (Clin Res Ed) 349, g4490.Google ScholarPubMed
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2020) National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) NHANES Procedure Manuals. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/continuousnhanes/manuals.aspx?BeginYear=2019 (accessed March 2021).Google Scholar
Yeh, TS, Yuan, C, Ascherio, A, et al. (2022) Long-term intake of total energy and fat in relation to subjective cognitive decline. Eur J Epidemiol 37, 133146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahluwalia, N, Dwyer, J, Terry, A, et al. (2016) Update on NHANES dietary data: focus on collection, release, analytical considerations, and uses to inform public policy. Adv Nutr 7, 121134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krebs-Smith, SM, Pannucci, TE, Subar, AF, et al. (2018) Update of the Healthy Eating Index: HEI-2015. J Acad Nutr Diet 118, 15911602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention & National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) (2021) NHANES Laboratory Data. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/search/datapage.aspx?Component=Laboratory (accessed March 2021).Google Scholar
Stampfer, MJ, Willett, WC, Speizer, FE, et al. (1984) Test of the National Death Index. Am J Epidemiol 119, 837839.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rich-Edwards, JW, Corsano, KA & Stampfer, MJ (1994) Test of the National Death Index and Equifax Nationwide Death Search. Am J Epidemiol 140, 10161019.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agudo, A & Joint FAO/WHO Workshop on Fruit and Vegetables for Health (2021) Measuring Intake of Fruit and Vegetables. www.whoint%2Fdietphysicalactivity%2Fpublications%2Ff%26v_intake_measurement.pdf (accessed September 2021).Google Scholar
Mori, N, Shimazu, T, Charvat, H, et al. (2019) Cruciferous vegetable intake and mortality in middle-aged adults: a prospective cohort study. Clin Nutr 38, 631643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuller, S, Beck, E, Salman, H, et al. (2016) New horizons for the study of dietary fiber and health: a review. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 71, 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gong, J & Yang, CB (2012) Advances in the methods for studying gut microbiota and their relevance to the research of dietary fiber functions. Food Res Int 48, 916929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arts, IC & Hollman, PC (2005) Polyphenols and disease risk in epidemiologic studies. Am J Clin Nutr 81, 317s325s.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costa, AGV, Garcia-Diaz, DF, Jimenez, P, et al. (2013) Bioactive compounds and health benefits of exotic tropical red-black berries. J Funct Foods 5, 539549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koenen, M, Hill, MA, Cohen, P, et al. (2021) Obesity, adipose tissue and vascular dysfunction. Circ Res 128, 951968.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bertoia, ML, Mukamal, KJ, Cahill, LE, et al. (2015) Changes in intake of fruits and vegetables and weight change in United States men and women followed for up to 24 years: analysis from three prospective cohort studies. PLoS Med 12, e1001878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nguyen, HC, Chen, CC, Lin, KH, et al. (2021) Bioactive compounds, antioxidants, and health benefits of sweet potato leaves. Molecule 26, 1820.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, Z, Wang, D, Ruiz-Narváez, EA, et al. (2021) Starchy vegetables and metabolic syndrome in Costa Rica. Nutrients 13, 1639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goshtasebi, A, Hosseinpour-Niazi, S, Mirmiran, P, et al. (2018) Pre-pregnancy consumption of starchy vegetables and legumes and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus among Tehranian women. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 139, 131138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, X, Jiao, J, Zhuang, P, et al. (2021) Current intake levels of potatoes and all-cause mortality in China: a population-based nationwide study. Nutrition 81, 110902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veronese, N, Stubbs, B, Noale, M, et al. (2017) Fried potato consumption is associated with elevated mortality: an 8-year longitudinal cohort study. Am J Clin Nutr 106, 162167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moholdt, T & Nilsen, TIL (2021) Frequency of boiled potato consumption and all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality in the prospective population-based HUNT study. Front Nutr 8, 681365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, GH, Soeandy, CD & Smith, CE (2013) White vegetables: glycemia and satiety. Adv Nutr 4, 356s367s.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yu, EY, Wesselius, A, Mehrkanoon, S, et al. (2021) Vegetable intake and the risk of bladder cancer in the BLadder Cancer Epidemiology and Nutritional Determinants (BLEND) international study. BMC Med 19, 56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borgi, L, Rimm, EB, Willett, WC, et al. (2016) Potato intake and incidence of hypertension: results from three prospective US cohort studies. BMJ (Clin Res Ed) 353, i2351.Google ScholarPubMed
Mazidi, M, Kengne, AP & Banach, M (2017) Mineral and vitamin consumption and telomere length among adults in the United States. Pol Arch Intern Med 127, 8790.Google ScholarPubMed
Rai, SK, Fung, TT, Lu, N, et al. (2017) The Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet, western diet, and risk of gout in men: prospective cohort study. BMJ (Clin Res Ed) 357, j1794.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services & U.S. Department of Agriculture (2021) Dietary Guidelines for Americans (2020–2025). https://wwwdietaryguidelinesgov/resources/2020–2025-dietary-guidelines-online-materials (accessed May 2022).Google Scholar
Soenen, S, Rayner, CK, Jones, KL, et al. (2016) The ageing gastrointestinal tract. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 19, 1218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Age-adjusted characteristics of participants according to individual vegetable intake in NHANES (1999–2014)*(Mean values and standard deviations; numbers)

Figure 1

Table 2. All-cause mortality according to starchy and non-starchy vegetable intake in NHANES (1999–2014)(Hazard ratios and 95 % confidence intervals)

Figure 2

Fig. 1. Dose–response relationship between total vegetables, total starchy vegetables, total non-starchy vegetables and all-cause mortality in NHANES (1999–2014)a. HR, hazard ratio; NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. a Adjusted for sex (male, female), age (18–45, 46–65, ≥ 66 years), total energy intake (kcal/d, tertile), race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic or other race), education (≤ 12th grade, high school graduate/GED or equivalent or more than high school), marital status (married, widowed/divorced/separated or never married), ratio of family income to poverty (< 1·30, 1·30–3·49 or ≥ 3·50), physical activity (< 8·3, 8·3–16·7 or > 16·7 METS-h/week), smoking (never smokers, former smokers or current smokers), drinking (never drinking, low to moderate drinking, heavy drinking), BMI (< 18·5, 18·5–24·9, 25·0–29·9 and ≥ 30·0), diabetes (no, yes), hypertension (no, yes), other CVD (no, yes), cancer (no, yes), HEI-2015 (tertile) and starchy and non-starchy vegetables were mutually adjusted. Of note, the dotted line represents the 95 % CI.

Figure 3

Fig. 2. HR of all-cause mortality per 1-sd increase in total starchy vegetables and non-starchy vegetables by subgroups in NHANES (1999–2014)a. HR, hazard ratios; METS, metabolic equivalent tasks; NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. a Adjusted for sex (male, female), age (18–45, 46–65, ≥ 66 years), total energy intake (kcal/d, tertile), race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic or other race), education (≤ 12th grade, high school graduate/GED or equivalent, or more than high school), marital status (married, widowed/divorced/separated, or never married), ratio of family income to poverty (< 1·30, 1·30–3·49 or ≥ 3·50), physical activity (< 8·3, 8·3–16·7 or > 16·7 METS-h/week), smoking (never smokers, former smokers or current smokers), drinking (never drinking, low to moderate drinking, heavy drinking), BMI (< 18·5, 18·5–24·9, 25·0–29·9, and ≥ 30·0), diabetes (no, yes), hypertension (no, yes), other CVD (no, yes), cancer (no, yes), HEI-2015 (tertile) and starchy and non-starchy vegetables were mutually adjusted. Of note, each stratified variable was removed from the corresponding model. Light physical activity was defined as participants with physical activity less than 8·3 METS-h per week, and moderate and vigorous activity was defined as participants who had physical activity of 8·3 METS-h per week or more.

Supplementary material: File

Zhang et al. supplementary material

Zhang et al. supplementary material

Download Zhang et al. supplementary material(File)
File 77.7 KB