Introduction
Shortly after the introduction of clozapine in the 70s, several cases of fatal agranulocytosis in Finland led to its market withdrawal in almost all countries. Following the study by Kane et al. in people with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) [Reference Kane, Honigfeld and Singer1], clozapine was reintroduced with strict blood monitoring rules to detect incident agranulocytosis, estimated at 1–2% lifetime. More than 35 years later, these rules have not been revised in most countries [Reference Oloyede, Blackman and Whiskey2]. Under current European Medicines Agency (EMA) regulation, white blood cell count (WBC) and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) monitoring is required weekly for the first 18 weeks after initiation of treatment and then monthly for the duration of treatment. For many patients, this can mean decades of monthly blood sampling.
Clozapine remains the only approved antipsychotic for TRS with superior efficacy and effectiveness for several endpoints, such as suicide, psychotic symptoms, relapse, rehospitalization, medication adherence, aggression, or substance use. Clozapine use is also associated with reduced all-cause, suicide, and cardiovascular mortality. While TRS occurs in about one-third of schizophrenia patients, only a minority of them are prescribed this medication [Reference Bachmann, Aagaard and Bernardo3], which represents a missed opportunity for these people, as their chances of recovery are much less favorable without clozapine [Reference Bachmann, Aagaard and Bernardo3–Reference Rubio, Kane and Tanskanen7].
The need for continued blood tests “for life” is a significant barrier to clozapine initiation and maintenance treatment increasing the risk of premature discontinuation [Reference Schulte, Veerman and Bakker8, Reference Verdoux, Quiles and Bachmann9]. From the prescriber’s perspective, the most common barriers to clozapine initiation are related to the institutional complexity of mandatory blood monitoring and an overestimated users’ poor adherence to this monitoring [Reference Verdoux, Quiles and Bachmann9]. Prescribers’ overestimation of agranulocytosis risk also contributes to under-monitoring of other adverse drug reactions with higher lethality including myocarditis, pneumonia, or ileus [Reference Girardin, Poncet and Blondon10].
Blood monitoring also comes at a cost. In addition to the direct costs of blood tests, monitoring is time-consuming for laboratories and pharmacies. It requires complex organizational adaptations to guarantee continuity of care, particularly at a time when medical and paramedical staffing levels are low. A cost-effectiveness analysis compared several blood monitoring strategies in a theoretical cohort of 100,000 people treated with clozapine [Reference Girardin, Poncet and Blondon10]. While the « no monitoring » strategy was the most cost-effective, no difference was found regarding quality-adjusted life-year gained compared to the other modalities, irrespective of the stringency of blood monitoring rules.
Low risk of agranulocytosis after the first year of treatment
Recent studies have confirmed that the risk window for clozapine-related agranulocytosis is mostly limited to the first months of treatment. A meta-analysis of 108 studies (1983–2017, 448,647 clozapine users) found a 3.8% incidence of mild neutropenia (≤ 1.5 × 109 per L), a 1.3% incidence of moderate neutropenia (≤ 1.0 × 109 per L) and a 0.9% of severe neutropenia, commonly referred to as agranulocytosis (≤ 0.5 × 109 per L) (0.7% when only high-quality studies were considered) [Reference Myles, Myles and Xia5]. The agranulocytosis fatality rate was one death for 7,700 clozapine users. The agranulocytosis prevalence was identical in studies conducted before and after the introduction of blood monitoring in 1990. In most cases (75%), mild neutropenia did not progress to severe neutropenia. Most cases of agranulocytosis occurred in the first few months of treatment: 38% in the first month, 56% within two months, 84% within the first 18 weeks, and 89% within the first year.
Neutropenia <1. 0 × 109 per L occurred in 1.2% of users in a population-based study of 26,000 clozapine users in Australia and New Zealand (1990–2022) with no fatal cases [Reference Northwood, Myles and Clark6]. The risk was highest during the first 18 weeks of treatment (weekly incidence 0.13%) and became negligible after 24 months. The incidence of any neutropenic event was very low when clozapine was reintroduced in people with no history of neutropenia over two years of cumulative monitoring. This finding suggests that there is no need to resume a weekly monitoring schedule after a clozapine interruption in people with no history of neutropenia.
Another population-based study of 14,037 clozapine users in Finland (1996–2017) found a cumulative incidence of agranulocytosis of 1.37% with clozapine compared with 0.13% with other antipsychotics [Reference Rubio, Kane and Tanskanen7]. The mortality rate for agranulocytosis was one death in 3,559 people starting clozapine. Compared to modal treatment duration for non-clozapine antipsychotics (12–23 months), the risk of agranulocytosis decreased over time from an adjusted odds ratio of 36 during the first six months of clozapine exposure to 4.38 for exposure ≥54 months: it became then comparable to that observed over the first six months of treatment for other antipsychotics for which no mandatory monitoring is required.
Stringency of blood monitoring rules already differs between European countries
A review of clozapine monitoring regulations in 102 countries highlighted the wide variability in monitoring rules and in WBC/ANC criteria for stopping clozapine [Reference Oloyede, Blackman and Whiskey2]. Although EMA regulation applies to all EU countries as well as Norway and Iceland, the blood monitoring rules already differ from one country to another [Reference Oloyede, Blackman and Whiskey2] (Supplementary Table 1). In several countries, the rule “no blood, no drug” does not apply and monitoring is already relaxed. The recommendations of the Netherlands Clozapine Collaboration Group, set up in 2006, allow for off-label less stringent monitoring rules after the first 18 weeks of treatment if the prescriber and the well-informed patient decide so. Similar recommendations apply to Iceland with the possibility of relaxed monitoring after six months. Monitoring stringency has no impact on the incidence of agranulocytosis but is inversely associated with the rate of clozapine use in each country [Reference Oloyede, Blackman and Whiskey2].
Criteria for clozapine discontinuation following a drop in WBC count also vary from country to country. Too stringent criteria may lead to unjustified discontinuation due to transient neutropenia not related to clozapine. Interdisciplinary boards involving psychiatrists and hematologists would be needed to exclude concurrent reasons for ANC decrease.
In most European countries, mild neutropenia, that is, ANC <1.5 × 109 per L requires discontinuation (Supplementary Table 1). However, in a few European countries under EMA regulation, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) criteria (ANC <1.0 × 109 per L) are used after 18 weeks [Reference Oloyede, Blackman and Whiskey2].
Several countries have adjusted the threshold criteria for clozapine discontinuation for people concerned with benign ethnic neutropenia (BEN) [Reference Kane, Honigfeld and Singer1] since their access to clozapine is markedly restricted under the standard criteria. For instance, the FDA threshold criteria for clozapine discontinuation for BEN is ANC <0.5 × 109 per L. The BEN-adjusted criteria are not yet applied in any country under the EMA regulation, leading to discrimination regarding access to clozapine for the many people living with BEN in Europe. For example, up to 80% of people of black African or Caribbean descent have the Duffy-null phenotype of the ACKR1 (Atypical Chemokine Receptor 1) gene associated with BEN.
Reducing barriers to clozapine by revising European blood monitoring rules
Thirty-five years ago, stringent blood monitoring rules were justified to ensure the successful reintroduction of clozapine. Today, this stringency no longer matches the reality of the actual hematological risk, as demonstrated by the growing body of evidence on the temporal pattern of clozapine-induced agranulocytosis. No other drug approved in Europe with a negligible risk of agranulocytosis after the first year of treatment requires lifelong monthly blood monitoring.
The European Clozapine Task Force is a group of psychiatrists and pharmacologists practicing in 18 countries under EMA regulation with extensive clinical and research expertise in clozapine. We are deeply concerned about the underuse of clozapine in European countries. We are convinced revising and updating the EMA’s blood monitoring rules could help to overcome the major barrier to the use of clozapine [Reference Verdoux, Quiles and Bachmann9].
Our proposals for new clozapine blood monitoring rules are detailed in Table 1. Only ANC criteria are given as the majority of authors (60%) are in favor of restricting mandatory monitoring to ANC based on FDA regulation revisions in 2015. However, no consensus could be reached among the members of the European Clozapine Task Force on this point.
1 Summaries of Product Characteristics;
2 Only Absolute Neutrophil Count criteria are given as the majority of authors (60%) are in favor of restricting mandatory monitoring to ANC based on Food and Drug Administration regulation revisions in 2015; however, no consensus could be reached among the members of the European Clozapine Task Force on this point;
3 White Blood Cells count;
4 Absolute Neutrophil Count;
5 Even if the frequency of routine mandatory monitoring is reduced, ANC must be performed immediately in the event of possible symptoms of infection (e.g. fever, sore throat, mouth/throat ulcers). Additional ANC may be considered after addition of valproic acid to clozapine, especially during the initiation period.
6 Food and Drug Administration criteria;
7 Benign Ethnic Neutropenia (hematology consultation may be needed to confirm the diagnosis).
Based on the currently available evidence, we propose to:
-
(i) relax the blood monitoring schedule after 12 months and 24 months of treatment,
-
(ii) lower ANC threshold for clozapine initiation and discontinuation,
-
(iii) use an adjusted threshold for BEN,
-
(iv) relax monitoring schedule after clozapine interruption,
-
(v) harmonize (i) to (iv) across Europe.
The benefits of revising the monitoring rules outweigh the potential risks associated with less stringent rules: allowing more people with TRS to get clozapine will save lives without increasing the risk of agranulocytosis.
Conclusion
Access to clozapine is currently severely hampered by multiple barriers resulting in a real loss of opportunity for many people with TRS, with a high price being paid by both the users and the healthcare system. Whenever deemed indicated, clozapine treatment must be initiated as soon as possible to promote recovery and to increase life expectancy. Better addressing these unmet needs should be considered as a public health priority by European health regulatory agencies, as it is currently done by the FDA. More balanced monitoring rules would contribute to reducing clozapine underprescription as well as discrimination against people with BEN. The time has come for revising the rules of clozapine blood monitoring in Europe.
Supplementary material
The supplementary material for this article can be found at http://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1816.
Data availability statement
Not relevant.
Financial support
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interest
The following authors declare none: Hélène VERDOUX, Robert BITTNER, Alexis LEPETIT, Manuel ARROJO-ROMERO, Christian BACHMANN, Marieke BEEX-OOSTERHUIS, Jan BOGERS, Dan COHEN, Marc DE HERT, Carlos DE LAS CUEVAS, John LALLY, Dolores KEATING, Judit LAZÁRY, Jurjen J. LUYKX, Olalla MARONAS AMIGO, Jimmi NIELSEN, Brian O’DONOGHUE, Pierre OSWALD, Flavian S RADULESCU, Christopher ROHDE, Emilio J. SANZ, Ivona ŠIMUNOVIĆ FILIPČIĆ, Iris E. SOMMER, Selene VEERMAN, Edoardo SPINA, Peter SCHULTE; Alkomiet HASAN is editor of the German (DGPPN) schizophrenia treatment guidelines, first author of the WFSBP schizophrenia treatment guidelines; on advisory boards of and speaker fees from AbbVie, Advanz (speaker fees only), Janssen-Cilag, Lundbeck, Recordati, Rovi, Teva, and Otsuka; Mishal QUBAD has received speaker fees from Recordati; Elias WAGNER was invited to advisory boards from Recordati, Teva and Boehringer Ingelheim; Andreja CELOFIGA participated in lectures for the following companies: Krka, Bonifar, Viatris, Gedeon Richter, Lek, and Lundbeck-Pharma; Domenico DE BERARDIS was speaker/consultant for Angelini, Innova Pharma, Janssen, Lundbeck, Viatris, Rovi and Otsuka Konstantinos; Bjørn EBDRUP is part of the Advisory Board of Boehringer Ingelheim, Lundbeck Pharma A/S; and has received lecture fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Otsuka Pharma Scandinavia AB, and Lundbeck Pharma A/S; N. FOUNTOULAKIS has received in the past grants, served as a consultant, advisor, or CME speaker, or received support to attend congresses by the following entities: AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Ferrer, Gedeon Richter, Janssen, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Pfizer, the Pfizer Foundation, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, Shire, and others; Daniel GUINART has been a consultant and/or advisor of has received honoraria from Angelini, Janssen, Lundbeck/Lundbeck Foundation, Otsuka, Teva; he currently receives funding from the European Commission (HORIZON EUROPE) and from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII); Miloslav KOPEČEK is member of advisory board and speakers’ honoraria from Angeliny Pharma and Lundbeck; Espen MOLDEN has received speaker’s honorarium from Lundbeck and Otsuka; Marina SAGUD has presented lectures for the following companies: Angelini, Belupo, Gedeon Richter, Johnson & Johnson, Krka Farma d.o.o., Lundbeck, Pliva d.o.o., and Viatris; participated in clinical trials as an principal investigator for Boeringer Ingelheim; and is a member of the advisory board of Lundbeck and Pliva; Heidi TAIPALE has participated in research projects funded by grants from Janssen to her employing institution; and has received lecture fees from Gedeon Richter, Janssen, Lundbeck and Otsuka; Jari TIIHONEN has participated in research projects funded by grants from Janssen to his employing institution; has served as a consultant for Healthcare Global Village, HLS Therapeutics, Janssen, Lundbeck, Orion, Teva, and WebMD Global; and has received honoraria from Janssen, Lundbeck, and Otsuka; Heli TUPPURAINEN has received speakers fee from Lundbeck; Alina WILKOWSKA has received research support from Angelini, Biogen, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen- Cilag, Lundbeck, Polpharma, Sanofi, Termedia, and Valeant.
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.