Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:45:37.644Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of plant oils in the diet on performance and milk fatty acid composition in goats fed diets based on grass hay or maize silage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2008

Laurence Bernard
Affiliation:
 INRA, UR1213 Herbivores, Equipe Tissu Adipeux et Lipides du Lait, Site de Theix, F-63122Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France
Kevin J. Shingfield
Affiliation:
 Animal Production Research, MTT Agrifood Research Finland, JokionenFIN 31600, Finland
Jacques Rouel
Affiliation:
 INRA, UR1213 Herbivores, Equipe Tissu Adipeux et Lipides du Lait, Site de Theix, F-63122Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France
Anne Ferlay
Affiliation:
 INRA, UR1213 Herbivores, Equipe Tissu Adipeux et Lipides du Lait, Site de Theix, F-63122Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France
Yves Chilliard*
Affiliation:
 INRA, UR1213 Herbivores, Equipe Tissu Adipeux et Lipides du Lait, Site de Theix, F-63122Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France
*
*Corresponding author: Dr Yves Chilliard, fax +33 473624519, email Yves.Chilliard@clermont.inra.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Based on the potential benefits to long-term human health there is interest in developing sustainable nutritional strategies for reducing saturated and increasing specific unsaturated fatty acids in ruminant milk. The impact of plant oil supplements to diets containing different forages on caprine milk fatty acid composition was examined in two experiments using twenty-seven Alpine goats in replicated 3 × 3 Latin squares with 28 d experimental periods. Treatments comprised of no oil (control) or 130 g/d of sunflower-seed oil (SO) or linseed oil (LO) supplements added to diets based on grass hay (H; experiment 1) or maize silage (M; experiment 2). Milk fat content was enhanced (P < 0·01) on HSO, HLO and MLO compared with the corresponding H or M control diets, resulting in 17, 15 and 14 % increases in milk fat secretion, respectively. For both experiments, plant oils decreased (P < 0·05) milk 10 : 0–16 : 0 and odd- and branched-chain fatty acid content and increased 18 : 0, trans6–9,11–14,16-18 : 1 (and their corresponding Δ-9 desaturase products), trans-7, trans-9-conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), trans-9, trans-11-CLA and trans-8, cis-10-CLA concentrations. Alterations in the distribution of cis-18 : 1, trans-18 : 1, -18 : 2 and CLA isomers in milk fat were related to plant oil composition and forage in the diet. In conclusion, plant oils represent an effective strategy for altering the fatty acid composition of caprine milk, with evidence that the basal diet is an important determinant of ruminal unsaturated fatty acid metabolism in the goat.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2008

Despite the lower scale of milk production from goats compared with cows in Europe, there is increasing interest in caprine milk due to inherent species-specific biochemical properties that contribute to nutritional quality. Caprine milk has been identified as a viable alternative for consumers that are sensitive or develop allergic reactions to bovine milk, and is known to be beneficial with respect to Cu, Zn and Se bioavailability(Reference Barrionuevo, Lopez Aliaga, Alferez, Mesa, Nestares and Campos1). Lipid in goats' milk is more digestible than bovine milk fat which may be related to the lower mean milk fat globule size, higher 8 : 0–10 : 0 concentrations and a larger proportion of short- and medium-chain fatty acids esterified at sn-3 in milk fat TAG(Reference Chilliard, Rouel, Ferlay, Bernard, Gaborit, Raynal-Ljutovac, Lauret, Leroux, Williams and Buttriss2).

Fatty acid composition is an important determinant of milk nutritional quality, with evidence that certain specific fatty acids exert negative effects (12 : 0, 14 : 0, 16 : 0) when consumed in excess, whilst others have potentially beneficial effects (anteiso-15 : 0, cis-9-18 : 1, 18 : 3n-3) on human health(Reference Parodi3). Furthermore, there is evidence in animal models that the predominant isomer of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) in ruminant milk, cis-9, trans-11, exhibits anticarcinogenic and anti-atherogenic properties(Reference Wahle, Heys and Rotondo4). Nutritional strategies for enhancing CLA content in caprine milk also result in an inevitable increase in trans-18 : 1 concentrations, with trans-11 typically being the major isomer(Reference Chilliard, Glasser, Ferlay, Bernard, Rouel and Doreau5). Epidemiological studies have implicated high intakes of trans-18 : 1 and -18 : 2 in the human being associated with an increase in CVD risk(Reference Mensink, Zock, Kester and Katan6), with emerging data supporting isomer-specific effects(Reference Shingfield, Chilliard, Toivonen, Kairenius and Givens7). A detailed evaluation of milk fatty acid composition responses to nutritional factors in the goat is therefore essential in attempting to establish the possible role of foods derived from modified caprine milk on long-term human health and disease prevention.

Nutrition is the main environmental factor regulating milk fat synthesis and fatty acid composition in ruminants(Reference Jensen8). However, experimental evidence on the role of diet on milk fat composition in the goat is limited(Reference Chilliard, Glasser, Ferlay, Bernard, Rouel and Doreau5, Reference Chilliard, Ferlay, Rouel and Lamberet9) whereas the nutritional regulation of bovine milk fat composition has been extensively investigated(Reference Chilliard, Glasser, Ferlay, Bernard, Rouel and Doreau5, Reference Shingfield, Chilliard, Toivonen, Kairenius and Givens7, Reference Dewhurst, Shingfield, Lee and Scolan10, Reference Vlaeminck, Fievez, Cabrita, Fonseca and Dewhurst11). For both species, forage in the diet is known to affect milk fat composition responses to plant oils, including trans-18 : 1 and CLA isomer concentrations(Reference Chilliard, Glasser, Ferlay, Bernard, Rouel and Doreau5, Reference Dewhurst, Shingfield, Lee and Scolan10). Nutritional modification of caprine milk fat composition is often accompanied by changes in milk fat synthesis, responses that differ compared with the lactating cow. Inclusion of lipids in the diet enhances milk fat secretion in the goat in the absence of systematic changes in milk yield and protein content(Reference Chilliard, Glasser, Ferlay, Bernard, Rouel and Doreau5, Reference Chilliard, Ferlay, Rouel and Lamberet9). In contrast, lipid supplements in the lactating cow typically increase milk production and tend to reduce milk protein content, whereas decreases in fat content occur on high-concentrate diets containing plant oils or in response to marine oils(Reference Palmquist, Beaulieu and Barbano12, Reference Chilliard and Ferlay13). The underlying mechanisms accounting for these differences are not well established but may reflect inter-species differences in digestion and/or specific metabolic responses.

Cis-9, trans-11-CLA in milk is derived from the ruminal metabolism of 18 : 2n-6(Reference Hartfoot, Hazlewood and Hobson14) and endogenous synthesis via the action of Δ-9 desaturase on trans-11-18 : 1 in ruminant tissues(Reference Mosley, Shafii, Moate and McGuire15, Reference Shingfield, Ahvenjarvi, Toivonen, Vanhatalo and Huhtanen16). Trans-11-18 : 1 is a common intermediate of 18 : 2n-6 and 18 : 3n-3 metabolism in the rumen(Reference Bauman and Griinari17). Studies in the lactating goat have been confined, in the most part, to evaluating the changes in major milk fatty acid concentrations to lipids rich in 18 : 3n-3(Reference Chilliard, Glasser, Ferlay, Bernard, Rouel and Doreau5, Reference Chilliard, Ferlay, Rouel and Lamberet9). Experiments with lactating cows have established that the forage source in the diet is a major determinant of milk fat composition responses to oils rich in unsaturated fatty acids(Reference Shingfield, Reynolds, Lupoli, Toivonen, Yurawecz, Delmonte, Griinari, Grandison and Beever18, Reference Roy, Ferlay, Shingfield and Chilliard19), whereas few data are available in goats. The present study was designed to examine the impact of plant oils on milk production and milk fatty acid composition in goats fed diets containing forages of differing botanical and chemical composition. A comprehensive evaluation of the effects of experimental treatments on milk fat composition, with specific emphasis on trans-18 : 1, 18 : 2 and CLA isomers, also provided further insight into the possible role of biohydrogenation intermediates in the regulation of milk fat synthesis in the goat.

Materials and methods

Animals, management and experimental design

All experimental procedures were approved by the Animal Care Committee of INRA in accordance with the Use of Vertebrates for Scientific Purposes Act 1985. Animals were recruited to experiments and allocated to treatment groups according to milk yield, milk fat and protein content, parity, stage of lactation and genotype score at the αS1 casein locus. Goats of the ‘middle type’ αS1 casein genotype(Reference Roncada, Gaviraghi, Liberatori, Canas, Bini and Greppi20) content were used in both experiments since this is associated with effects on milk traits(Reference Grosclaude, Ricardeau, Martin, Remeuf, Vassal and Bouillon21) and fatty acid composition(Reference Chilliard, Rouel and Leroux22). For the first experiment, thirteen multiparous (3·2 (SD 1·3)) Alpine goats in mid-lactation (77 (SD 7)) d in lactation) were offered three experimental diets according to a replicated 3 × 3 Latin square design with 28 d experimental periods using four or five animals per group. In the second experiment, fourteen multiparous (3·3 (SD 1·1)) Alpine goats in mid-lactation (70 (SD 7)) d in lactation) were fed three experimental diets according to a replicated 3 × 3 Latin square design with four or five animals per group with 28 d experimental periods. Fifteen goats were recruited for each experiment, but due to mammary cysts or pseudo-pregnancy, two animals were withdrawn from the first experiment and one from the second. Each experimental period was comprised of 21 d adaptation and 7 d sampling periods. Goats were housed in a metabolism unit in individual stalls, with continuous access to water and milked at 08.00 and 16.00 hours. For both experiments, diets were formulated to meet energy and protein requirements(Reference Jarrige23).

Experimental diets

In experiment 1, diets were comprised of hay prepared from regrowths of natural grassland pasture offered ad libitum and a concentrate mixture (Table 1) supplemented with no additional lipid (H), linseed oil (130 g/d) (HLO; SA Vandeputte, Mouscron, Belgium) or sunflower-seed oil (130 g/d) (HSO; Auvergne Trituration, Lezoux, France). For experiment 2, diets were based on maize silage offered ad libitum and a concentrate mixture (Table 1) supplemented with no additional lipid (M), sunflower-seed oil (130 g/d) (MSO) or linseed oil (130 g/d) (MLO). In both experiments, concentrates allocated according to milk yield at the start of experiment and plant oils were mixed together and offered as two equal meals at 08.30 and 16.30 hours. Experiments were conducted during the Spring (from March until the end of May).

Table 1 Ingredient and chemical composition of experimental diets

H, diet based on natural grassland hay (experiment 1) supplemented with no additional oil; HSO, diet based on natural grassland hay (experiment 1) supplemented with sunflower-seed oil; HLO, diet based on natural grassland hay (experiment 1) supplemented with linseed oil; M, diet based on maize silage (experiment 2) supplemented with no additional oil; MSO, diet based on maize silage (experiment 2) supplemented with sunflower-seed oil; MLO, diet based on maize silage (experiment 2) supplemented with linseed oil.

* Sunflower-seed oil in experiment 1 contained (g/kg): 16 : 0, 64·7; 18 : 0, 30·8; cis-9-18 : 1, 204·5; 18 : 2n-6, 657·2; 18 : 3n-3, 0·0. Sunflower-seed oil in experiment 2 contained (g/kg): 16 : 0, 66·3; 18 : 0, 38·3; cis-9-18 : 1, 174·9; 18 : 2n-6, 704·3; 18 : 3n-3, 0·9.

Linseed oil in experiment 1 contained (g/kg): 16 : 0, 58·2; 18 : 0, 16·0; cis-9-18 : 1, 168·3; 18 : 2n-6, 147·1; 18 : 3n-3, 566·8. Linseed oil in experiment 2 contained (g/kg): 16 : 0, 58·4; 18 : 0, 35·5; cis-9-18 : 1, 189·4; 18 : 2n-6, 155·8; 18 : 3n-3, 489·7.

Mineral–vitamin supplement declared as containing (g/kg): Ca, 240; P, 60; Mg, 50; Na, 15; Zn, 7; Mn, 6; α-tocopherol, 0·3; retinol, 0·2; cholecalciferol, 0·002 (Centraliment, Ussel France).

Measurements and sampling

Individual intakes were recorded daily, but only measurements collected during the last week of each experimental period were used for statistical analysis. During each experimental period, representative samples of hay, maize silage and concentrates were composited daily and stored at − 20°C. Chemical composition of feed ingredients was determined using standard procedures(24). Milk yields of individual goats were recorded thrice weekly, while only measurements collected during the last week of each experimental period were analysed statistically. Samples of milk for the measurement of fat, protein and lactose were collected from each goat over four consecutive milkings starting at 08.00 hours on day 21 of each experimental period and treated with preservative (potassium bichromate; Merck, Fontenay-Sous-Bois, France). Milk fat, protein and lactose were determined by near IR spectroscopy(24) calibrated using reference caprine milk samples. Unpreserved samples of milk were collected over two consecutive milkings starting at 08.00 hours on day 22 of each experimental period, stored at − 20°C, composited and submitted for fatty acid analysis. Live weight of experimental animals was measured at the start and end of each experimental period in both experiments.

Lipid analysis

Lipids in natural grassland hay, maize silage and concentrates were extracted(Reference Folch, Lees and Sloane Stanley25) and transesterified(Reference Loor, Ferlay, Ollier, Doreau and Chilliard26) according to standard procedures using 23 : 0 (Sigma, Saint-Quentin Fallavier, France) as an internal standard. For experiment 1, lipids in 130 mg of lyophilised milk samples were extracted in 10 ml of a mixture of hexane–diethyl ether (50:50, v/v), 1 ml saturated NaCl solution and 1 ml ethanol. After mixing, the organic phase was recovered by centrifugation at 1000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C, repeatedly rinsed (n 3) with 5 ml of a mixture of hexane–diethyl ether (50:50, v/v) and dried under N2. Fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) were prepared following the addition of 100 μl of 1 m-sodium methanolate at room temperature for 10 min followed by 500 μl of 14 % (v/v) boron trifluoride in methanol for 10 min(Reference Glass27). Lipids in 130 mg of lyophilised milk samples from experiment 2 were methylated directly using 2 ml 0·5 m-sodium methanolate at 50°C for 5 min, followed after cooling by the addition of 100 μl 12 m-HCl at room temperature for 10 min. FAME were recovered in 2 ml hexane and washed with 3 ml water. Direct comparisons indicated no differences in FAME profile between transesterification procedures applied to samples from experiments 1 and 2(Reference Chilliard, Rouel and Leroux22).

Methyl esters were quantified by GLC using a gas chromatograph Trace-GC 2000 equipped with a flame-ionisation detector (Thermo Finnigan, Les Ullis, France) and 100 m fused silica capillary column (CP-SIL 88; Chrompack 7489, Middelburg, The Netherlands) using H2 as the carrier and fuel gas. Total FAME profile in a 2 μl sample at a split ratio of 1:50 was determined using a temperature gradient program(Reference Loor, Ferlay, Ollier, Doreau and Chilliard26). Peaks were routinely identified using authentic standards (Sigma, Saint-Quentin Fallavier, France) and a reference butter oil (CRM 164; Commission of the European Communities, Community Bureau of Reference, Brussels, Belgium) was used to estimate correction factors for short-chain (4 : 0–10 : 0) fatty acids. Methyl esters not contained in commercially available standards were identified based on comparisons with reference milk fat samples for which detailed structural analysis was made based on GC–MS of 4,4-dimethyloxazoline fatty acid derivatives(Reference Shingfield, Chilliard, Toivonen, Kairenius and Givens7, Reference Shingfield, Reynolds, Hervas, Griinari, Grandison and Beever28).

The distribution of CLA isomers in milk FAME was determined by HPLC using four silver-impregnated silica columns (ChromSpher 5 lipids, 250 × 4·6 mm, 5 μm particle size; Varian Ltd, Walton-on-Thames, Surrey, UK) coupled in series and 0·1 % (v/v) acetonitrile in heptane as the mobile phase(Reference Shingfield, Ahvenjärvi, Toivonen, Ärölä, Nurmela, Huhtanen and Griinari29). Isomers were identified using an authentic CLA methyl ester standard (O-5632; Sigma-Aldrich, YA-Kemia Limited, Helsinki, Finland) and chemically synthesised trans-9, cis-11-CLA(Reference Shingfield, Reynolds, Lupoli, Toivonen, Yurawecz, Delmonte, Griinari, Grandison and Beever18). Identification was verified by cross-referencing with the elution order reported in the literature(Reference Shingfield, Ahvenjärvi, Toivonen, Ärölä, Nurmela, Huhtanen and Griinari29) using cis-9, trans-11-CLA as a landmark isomer.

Statistical analysis

Experimental data from both experiments were subjected to ANOVA using the general linear model procedure of the SAS software package (version 8.2; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) with a model that included the effects of goat, period, and treatment. Least-square means with their standard errors are reported and treatment effects were declared significant at P < 0·05. Relationships between oil treatments, forages and milk production and composition were assessed by principal component analysis (PCA), using dedicated on-line software (‘R’ software package; http://www.r-project.org/).

Results

Diet composition

Maize silage was of high quality both in terms of nutritive value and fermentation characteristics and had the following composition (g/kg DM, unless otherwise stated): DM (g/kg fresh weight), 308; organic matter, 949; crude protein, 86; acid-detergent fibre, 243; neutral-detergent fibre, 412; starch, 327; fatty acid content, 29. Natural grassland hay was of high nutritional quality and had the following composition (g/kg DM, unless otherwise stated): DM (g/kg fresh weight), 827; organic matter, 899; crude protein, 187; acid-detergent fibre, 277; neutral-detergent fibre, 548; fatty acid content, 26.

Crude protein, starch and neutral-detergent fibre content of H-based diets averaged 178, 87 and 411 g/kg DM with corresponding values for M-based diets of 161, 240 and 300 (Table 1). Grassland hay and linseed oil were rich in 18 : 3n-3 (11·9 and 567 g/kg DM), while 18 : 2n-6 predominated in maize silage, concentrates and sunflower-seed oil (12·3, 8·2 and 704 g/kg DM, respectively).

Animal performance

Plant oils reduced (P < 0·05) DM intake on M-based diets (experiment 2). Irrespective of the basal forage, linseed oil and sunflower-seed oil in the diet, with the exception of treatment MSO, had no effect on milk yield. Inclusion of plant oils increased (P < 0·01) milk fat content and yield in diets based on natural grassland hay, while milk fat content was enhanced for MLO compared with M and MSO treatments (Table 2). In both experiments, plant oils enhanced (P < 0·001) lactose content (Table 2), but only treatments MSO and MLO increased (P < 0·001) milk lactose secretion compared with the M control diet.

Table 2 Effect of experimental treatment on DM intake, milk yield and milk composition (Mean values with their standard errors for thirteen goats (experiment 1) and fourteen goats (experiment 2))

H, diet based on natural grassland hay (experiment 1) supplemented with no additional oil; HSO, diet based on natural grassland hay (experiment 1) supplemented with sunflower-seed oil; HLO, diet based on natural grassland hay (experiment 1) supplemented with linseed oil; M, diet based on maize silage (experiment 2) supplemented with no additional oil; MSO, diet based on maize silage (experiment 2) supplemented with sunflower-seed oil; MLO, diet based on maize silage (experiment 2) supplemented with linseed oil.

a,b,c Mean values for each experiment within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P < 0·05).

* Error df 22 and 24 for experiments 1 and 2, respectively.

Energy and N balances(Reference Jarrige23) were positive in both experiments (data not shown), with mean values of 1044 and 2160 kJ net energy for lactation per d, and 57 and 30 g digestible protein at the intestine per d, for diets fed in experiments 1 and 2, respectively.

Milk fatty acid composition

In both experiments, plant oils in the diet increased (P < 0·05) milk 4 : 0 and decreased (P < 0·05) 8 : 0 concentrations (Table 3). Changes in milk fatty acid composition to sunflower-seed oil and linseed oil were characterised by decreases (P < 0·05) in milk fat 9 : 0 to 17 : 0 and branched-chain fatty acids, except iso-17 : 0, and an increase in 18 : 0 concentration, responses that were comparable between experiments (Table 3). Concentrations of 18 : 3n-3 were reduced (P < 0·05) in response to sunflower-seed oil on hay-based diets (experiment 1), but were enhanced (P < 0·05) by linseed oil in maize silage-based diets (experiment 2). Milk fat 20 : 5n-3 and 22 : 5n-3 concentrations were higher in experiment 1 compared with experiment 2, whilst sunflower-seed oil and linseed oil in the diet tended to decrease milk 20 : 5n-3 content (Table 3). In both experiments, plant oils also decreased (P < 0·05) cis-9-10 : 1, cis-9-14 : 1 and cis-9-16 : 1 concentrations and resulted in an overall relative reduction in milk 4 : 0–16 : 0 concentration of 34, 37, 36 and 34 %, for treatments HSO, MSO, HLO and MLO, respectively.

Table 3 Effect of experimental treatment on milk fatty acid composition (g/100 g fatty acids) (Mean values with their standard errors for thirteen goats (experiment 1) and fourteen goats (experiment 2))

H, diet based on natural grassland hay (experiment 1) supplemented with no additional oil; HSO, diet based on natural grassland hay (experiment 1) supplemented with sunflower-seed oil; HLO, diet based on natural grassland hay (experiment 1) supplemented with linseed oil; M, diet based on maize silage (experiment 2) supplemented with no additional oil; MSO, diet based on maize silage (experiment 2) supplemented with sunflower-seed oil; MLO, diet based on maize silage (experiment 2) supplemented with linseed oil; CLA, conjugated linoleic acid.

a,b,c Mean values for each experiment within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P < 0·05).

* Error df 22 and 24 for experiments 1 and 2, respectively.

Sum of 18 : 2 fatty acids excluding isomers of CLA.

Concentrations of trans-18 : 1 isomers were increased (P < 0·001) by plant oils in both experiments (Table 3) with higher concentrations in milk from diets based on maize silage (experiment 2) compared with natural grassland hay (experiment 1). Relative increases in milk fat trans-18 : 1 to sunflower-seed oil were higher for MSO (+500 %) than HSO (+390 %) treatments. Irrespective of forage type, plant oils enhanced (P < 0·05) milk trans4–9 concentrations, while increases (P < 0·01) in trans-10-18 : 1 content to sunflower-seed oil were confined to maize silage-based diets (+630 %). Plant oils enhanced (P < 0·05) milk trans-11-18 : 1 concentrations in both experiments, but the relative increases to linseed oil in the diet were larger for HLO (+439 %) than MLO (+358 %) treatments (Table 4). Overall, trans-11 accounted for 48–59 and 67–82 % of total trans-18 : 1 in milk for M- or H-based diets. Inclusion of sunflower-seed oil, and to a larger extent linseed oil, increased (P < 0·05) trans-13,14-18 : 1 concentrations, responses that were more pronounced for diets based on maize silage compared with grassland hay.

Table 4 Effect of experimental treatment on milk 18 : 1 composition (g/100 g total fatty acids) (Mean values with their standard errors for thirteen goats (experiment 1) and fourteen goats (experiment 2))

H, diet based on natural grassland hay (experiment 1) supplemented with no additional oil; HSO, diet based on natural grassland hay (experiment 1) supplemented with sunflower-seed oil; HLO, diet based on natural grassland hay (experiment 1) supplemented with linseed oil; M, diet based on maize silage (experiment 2) supplemented with no additional oil; MSO, diet based on maize silage (experiment 2) supplemented with sunflower-seed oil; MLO, diet based on maize silage (experiment 2) supplemented with linseed oil; tr, concentrations below 0·001 mg/100 g fatty acids.

a,b,c Mean values for each experiment within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P < 0·05).

* Error df 22 and 24 for experiments 1 and 2, respectively.

Contains trans-17-18 : 1 as a minor component.

Contains cis-14-18 : 1 as a minor component.

Concentrations of total cis-18 : 1 increased (P < 0·001) in response to lipid-supplements (+21 and +23 % to sunflower-seed oil and linseed oil, respectively in experiment 2), whereas significant increases were confined to sunflower-seed oil (+26 %) in experiment 1 (Table 3). Overall, cis-9-18 : 1 accounted for 85·5–96·2 % of total cis-18 : 1. For both experiments, inclusion of plant oils in the diet enhanced cis12–16-18 : 1 content (Table 4).

Plant oils altered the relative abundance of non-methylene-interrupted 18 : 2 isomers (Table 5). In both experiments, sunflower-seed oil and linseed oil increased (P < 0·001) milk fat cis-9, trans-13-18 : 2 concentrations. Irrespective of the basal diet, linseed oil enhanced (P < 0·001) cis-9, trans-12-18 : 2, trans-9, cis-12-18 : 2, trans-9, trans-12-18 : 2, trans-11, cis-15-18 : 2 and trans-11, trans-15-18 : 2 concentrations in milk fat, while sunflower-seed oil increased (P < 0·001) milk trans-9, trans-14-18 : 2 content (Table 5). Concentrations of 18 : 2n-6 were higher (P < 0·05) in milk from MSO, and were consistently lower in milk from animals on diets containing linseed oil (Table 5).

Table 5 Effect of experimental treatment on milk 18 : 2 composition (mg/100 g total fatty acids) (Mean values with their standard errors for thirteen goats (experiment 1) and fourteen goats (experiment 2))

H, diet based on natural grassland hay (experiment 1) supplemented with no additional oil; HSO, diet based on natural grassland hay (experiment 1) supplemented with sunflower-seed oil; HLO, diet based on natural grassland hay (experiment 1) supplemented with linseed oil; M, diet based on maize silage (experiment 2) supplemented with no additional oil; MSO, diet based on maize silage (experiment 2) supplemented with sunflower-seed oil; MLO, diet based on maize silage (experiment 2) supplemented with linseed oil; tr, concentrations below 0·5 mg/100 g fatty acids; CLA, conjugated linoleic acid.

a,b,c Mean values for each experiment within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P < 0·05).

* Error df 22 and 24 for experiments 1 and 2, respectively.

Milk conjugated 18 : 2 isomers

In both experiments, plant oils enhanced (P < 0·001) cis-9, trans-11 and total CLA concentrations (Table 5). Cis-9, trans-11 was the major isomer accounting for 79–91 % of total CLA, but a wide range of other CLA isomers were detected in milk, which based on relative abundance (>50 mg/100 g fatty acids) ranked as trans-11, cis-13-CLA, trans-7, cis-9-CLA, trans-8, cis-10-CLA and trans-9, trans-11-CLA. Irrespective of the basal forage, plant oils increased (P < 0·05) trans-9, trans-11-CLA and trans-7, trans-9-CLA concentrations, and to a greater extent trans-8, cis-10-CLA, trans-7, cis-9-CLA and cis-9, trans-11-CLA concentrations (Table 5). Inclusion of sunflower-seed oil in the diet resulted in a specific enrichment (P = 0·001) of trans-10, trans-12-CLA and trans-10, cis-12-CLA, while linseed oil enhanced (P < 0·05) milk fat trans-12, trans-14-CLA, trans-11, trans-13-CLA, trans-12, cis-14-CLA, cis-12, trans-14-CLA and trans-11, cis-13-CLA concentrations. In other respects, trans-12, trans-14-CLA, trans-11, trans-13-CLA, cis-12, trans-14-CLA and trans-11, cis-13-CLA concentrations were higher and trans-10, cis-12-CLA and trans-7, cis-9-CLA content was lower in milk from diets based on grassland hay compared with maize silage (Table 5).

Principal component analysis

PCA of data from both experiments allowed for the discrimination of three significant principal components (PC) that could account for proportionately 0·399 (PC1), 0·116 (PC2) and 0·109 (PC3) of the total variation in milk yield and composition, and milk fatty acid composition. From the biplot PC1 × PC2 resulting from PCA applied to different dietary treatments, four clusters were apparent, with PC1 discriminating on the basis of the lipid supplementation and PC2 discriminating the two more extreme diets (HLO and MSO) (Fig. 1 (a)). Similarly, the biplot PC1 × PC3 revealed two clusters that PC3 discriminated on the basis of plant oil composition (linseed oil v. sunflower-seed oil) (Fig. 1 (b)).

Fig. 1 Principal component analysis of data derived from the analysis of eighty-one milk samples. (a) Distribution of samples based on the first two principal components (PC1 and PC2). Each group represents a dietary treatment and each point is the barycentre of data for individual goats. (b) Distribution of samples based on the primary and tertiary principal components (PC1 and PC3). (c) Plot of experimental variables projected on the basis of the first two principal components (PC1 and PC2) that describe the association between milk yield, milk composition and milk fatty acids concentration. Only measured parameters with correlation coefficients ( < − 0·60 or >0·60) for a single principal component are indicated. H, diet based on natural grassland hay (experiment 1) supplemented with no additional oil; HSO, diet based on natural grassland hay (experiment 1) supplemented with sunflower-seed oil; HLO, diet based on natural grassland hay (experiment 1) supplemented with linseed oil; M, diet based on maize silage (experiment 2) supplemented with no additional oil; MSO, diet based on maize silage (experiment 2) supplemented with sunflower-seed oil; MLO, diet based on maize silage (experiment 2) supplemented with linseed oil; c, cis; t, trans.

On the basis of the PC1 × PC2 loading plot that accounted for proportionately 0·515 of total variation in milk yield, composition and fatty acid concentration, four clusters of specific fatty acids with a correlation coefficient with PC of >0·6 or < − 0·6 were distinguished. The PC1 (Fig. 1 (c)) contains two groups of fatty acids with different metabolic origins. Fatty acids synthesised de novo (10 : 0, 12 : 0, 14 : 0, 16 : 0), medium-chain Δ-9 desaturase products (cis-9-10 : 1, cis-9-12 : 0, cis-9-14 : 1, cis-9-16 : 1) and odd- and branched-chain-fatty acids (13 : 0, iso-14, iso-16, 15 : 0, anteiso-15 and 17 : 0) were clustered as a single group that was negatively correlated with PC1. In contrast, long-chain SFA (18 : 0), MUFA (trans-9-16 : 1, cis-12-18 : 1, cis-13-18 : 1, cis-16-18 : 1, trans6–12,16-18 : 1), CLA (trans-9, trans-11-CLA, trans-8, cis-10-CLA) and long-chain Δ-9 desaturase products (trans-7, cis-9-CLA, cis-9, trans-11-CLA and cis-9, trans-13-18 : 2) were clustered in a second group that was positively correlated to PC1. The PC2 (Fig. 1 (c)) distinguished between 18 : 2n-6 and 18 : 3n-3 in the diet, with correlation coefficients with PC2 of 0·60 and − 0·84, respectively. PC3 (data not shown) discriminated on the basis of plant oil composition with positive and negative relationships observed for sunflower-seed oil- and linseed oil-supplemented diets, respectively. On the basis of correlation coefficients with PC3, two clusters of fatty acids were identified containing iso-17 : 0 (r>0·6) in one group and 6 : 0, 8 : 0, trans-11, cis-15-18 : 2 and cis-12, trans-14-CLA in the other (r < − 0·6).

Discussion

Unique features of the present study included a comprehensive determination of milk fatty acid composition responses to plant oils in goats fed diets containing grassland hay or maize silage. Detailed measurements of milk fat composition are important in understanding the potential impact of modified goat-derived foods on human-related outcomes as well as providing a basis for between-species comparisons with data derived from published studies in lactating cows fed comparable diets. Furthermore, characterisation of specific effects on trans-18 : 1, 18 : 2 and CLA isomers also provides further insight into the possible role of biohydrogenation intermediates in the regulation of milk fat synthesis in the goat compared with the known anti-lipogenic activity of fatty acid intermediates in the lactating cow.

The effect of forage type on milk fatty acid composition responses to plant oils was assessed in two independent experiments at the same time of the year rather than in a single study. Even though all experimental treatments were not evaluated simultaneously, strong inferences on the role of forage in the diet can be drawn since the milk production potential, parity, stage of lactation and genotype at the αS1 casein locus of experimental animals were similar across experiments, and the fatty acid composition of plant oils was comparable between experiments (Table 1). Furthermore, data were also analysed by PCA, with between-experiment differences in responses to lipid supplements being interpreted as attributable, at least in the most part, to the composition of the basal diet.

Animal performance

Milk production and composition responses to sunflower-seed oil and linseed oil were consistent with previous studies(Reference Chilliard, Ferlay, Rouel and Lamberet9), supporting the view that plant oils typically have no effect on milk yield, enhance milk fat secretion, but induce variable effects on milk protein concentrations in goats. In contrast, supplements of oils rich in PUFA often result in diet-induced milk fat depression in lactating cows(Reference Chilliard and Ferlay13, Reference Bauman and Griinari17, Reference Shingfield and Griinari30). However, inclusion of sunflower-seed oil in maize silage-based diets increased milk yield, but had no effect on milk fat content, highlighting the important role of the basal diet composition on milk production responses to lipid supplements in goats. Increases in milk fat content (5·6 and 5·1 g/kg, respectively) to the HSO and HLO treatments are in line with increases of 6·6 or 7·2 g/kg reported for goats fed diets based on cocksfoot hay supplemented with formaldehyde-treated linseed(Reference Bernard, Rouel, Leroux, Ferlay, Faulconnier, Legrand and Chilliard31) or linseed oil(Reference Chilliard and Ferlay13).

Milk fatty acid composition

Effect of plant oils

The impact of linseed oil and sunflower-seed oil on the concentrations of major fatty acids in milk were consistent between experiments (Fig. 1(a) and (c)) and in general agreement with earlier studies in lactating cows and goats(Reference Chilliard, Glasser, Ferlay, Bernard, Rouel and Doreau5, Reference Shingfield, Chilliard, Toivonen, Kairenius and Givens7). Irrespective of forage type, plant oils in the diet decreased the concentration of milk fatty acids (10 : 0, 12 : 0, 14 : 0 and 16 : 0) synthesised de novo (Table 3), consistent with previous studies in lactating goats(Reference Chilliard, Glasser, Ferlay, Bernard, Rouel and Doreau5, Reference Bernard, Rouel, Leroux, Ferlay, Faulconnier, Legrand and Chilliard31) and cows(Reference Chilliard, Glasser, Ferlay, Bernard, Rouel and Doreau5, Reference Shingfield, Chilliard, Toivonen, Kairenius and Givens7). Reductions in the concentration of fatty acids derived from de novo synthesis were accompanied by decreases in milk odd- and branched-chain fatty acids other than iso-17 : 0 content, consistent with the changes determined in lactating cows(Reference Loor, Ferlay, Ollier, Doreau and Chilliard26, Reference Collomb, Sieber and Butikofer32, Reference Rego, Rosa, Portugal, Franco, Vouzela, Borba and Bessa33). Overall, the changes in odd- and branched-chain fatty acids and 10 : 0–16 : 0 concentrations (Fig. 1 (c)) suggest that the incorporation of both groups of fatty acids into milk share a common point of regulation which is inhibited by 18 : 2n-6 or 18 : 3n-3 and/or fatty acid intermediates formed during ruminal PUFA metabolism.

Plant oils enhanced milk fat 18 : 0, cis-12-18 : 1, trans-18 : 1 (Δ6–9,11–14,16), 18 : 2 Δ-9 desaturase products (cis-9, trans-13-18 : 2, cis-9, trans-11-CLA, trans-7, cis-9-CLA), trans-7, trans-9-CLA, trans-9, trans-11-CLA and trans-8, cis-10-CLA concentrations. Earlier studies have also shown that lipids rich in 18 : 2n-6 or 18 : 3n-3 increase one or more of these fatty acids in bovine or caprine milk(Reference Chilliard, Glasser, Ferlay, Bernard, Rouel and Doreau5, Reference Shingfield, Chilliard, Toivonen, Kairenius and Givens7).

Inclusion of lipids rich in 18 : 2n-6 and 18 : 3n-3 resulted in substantial increases in milk cis-9, trans-11-CLA and trans-11-18 : 1 concentrations that were closely associated across experiments (y = 0·437x+0·133; n 81; r +0·92; P < 0·001; Fig. 1 (c)), confirming the product–precursor relationship for Δ-9 desaturase established in bovine(Reference Bauman and Griinari17) and caprine(Reference Chilliard, Ferlay, Rouel and Lamberet9) milk fat. This close relationship also suggests that larger proportionate increases in trans-11-18 : 1 supply at the mammary gland account for the larger milk fat cis-9, trans-11-CLA responses to plant oils on maize silage-based diets in the goat(Reference Chilliard, Rouel, Ferlay, Bernard, Gaborit, Raynal-Ljutovac, Lauret, Leroux, Williams and Buttriss2, Reference Chilliard, Glasser, Ferlay, Bernard, Rouel and Doreau5) compared with the cow(Reference Roy, Ferlay, Shingfield and Chilliard19). Furthermore, increases in milk fat cis-9, trans-11-CLA content to plant oils have been shown to persist over a 10-week period in goats fed diets based on hay, concentrates or maize silage(Reference Chilliard, Glasser, Ferlay, Bernard, Rouel and Doreau5), whereas responses are transient and decrease over time in cows fed high-concentrate or maize silage-based diets(Reference Shingfield, Reynolds, Lupoli, Toivonen, Yurawecz, Delmonte, Griinari, Grandison and Beever18, Reference Roy, Ferlay, Shingfield and Chilliard19).

Both plant oils in the diet enhanced milk cis-9-18 : 1 content on maize silage-based diets, whereas only sunflower-seed oil enhanced cis-9-18 : 1 in milk on grassland hay-based diets. A large proportion of cis-9-18 : 1 secreted in milk is derived via the action of Δ-9 desaturase on 18 : 0(Reference Mosley, Shafii, Moate and McGuire15, Reference Bauman and Griinari17), suggesting that most of the increases in cis-9-18 : 1 to plant oils can be attributed to increases in ruminal 18 : 0 outflow. However, the relative increases in cis-9-18 : 1 concentrations in both experiments are lower than could be expected when comparable diets are fed to lactating cows(Reference Chilliard, Glasser, Ferlay, Bernard, Rouel and Doreau5, Reference Dewhurst, Shingfield, Lee and Scolan10, Reference Roy, Ferlay, Shingfield and Chilliard19). Inter-species differences may be related to the relative sensitivity of the Δ-9 desaturase enzyme system to the inhibitory effects of PUFA which appear to be greater in the goat than the cow(Reference Bernard, Leroux and Chilliard34) and/or to larger increases in the enrichment of trans-9, trans-11-CLA in milk (that is a known inhibitor of bovine Δ-9 desaturase(Reference Perfield, Lock, Griinari, Sæbø, Delmonte, Dwyer and Bauman35)) in the goat determined in the present study compared with cows receiving diets comparable with the MSO and HLO treatments(Reference Roy, Ferlay, Shingfield and Chilliard19).

Specific effects of sunflower-seed oil

Amongst the six diets evaluated in the present study, two treatments were discriminated by PCA: MSO and HLO (Fig. 1 (a)). This suggests that interactions between carbohydrate composition and PUFA in the diet are an important determinant of the extent of ruminal biohydrogenation, formation of specific biohydrogenation intermediate products and mammary metabolism in the goat, factors that have been shown to have a role in the regulation of milk fat composition in lactating cows(Reference Chilliard, Glasser, Ferlay, Bernard, Rouel and Doreau5, Reference Shingfield, Chilliard, Toivonen, Kairenius and Givens7, Reference Loor, Ueda, Ferlay, Chilliard and Doreau36).

Increases in milk fat trans-8, cis-10-CLA and trans-10, trans-12-CLA concentrations were higher in response to sunflower-seed oil than linseed oil. Comparisons between-experiments also indicated that the increases in these CLA isomers were greater for maize silage than grassland hay-based diets (Fig. 1 (c)). Previous studies have shown that 18 : 2n-6 increases ruminal outflow of trans-10, trans-12-CLA(Reference Shingfield, Ahvenjärvi, Toivonen, Vanhatalo, Huhtanen and Griinari37) and that plant oils rich in 18 : 2n-6 enhance concentrations of trans-10, trans-12-CLA, trans-8, cis-10-CLA and trans-7, cis-9-CLA in bovine milk(Reference Roy, Ferlay, Shingfield and Chilliard19, Reference Collomb, Sieber and Butikofer32).

Treatment MSO resulted in the highest milk fat trans-10-18 : 1 concentration, consistent with earlier comparisons of milk fat responses to dietary unsaturated fatty acids in goats fed maize silage- or lucerne hay-based diets(Reference Chilliard, Glasser, Ferlay, Bernard, Rouel and Doreau5, Reference Chilliard and Ferlay13). The extent of unsaturated fatty acid metabolism in the rumen and the formation of specific intermediates in the cow is known to be dependent on diet composition, with the flow of trans-10-18 : 1 at the duodenum tending to replace trans-11-18 : 1 when the ratio of starch:fibre in the diet is increased(Reference Bauman and Griinari17, Reference Shingfield and Griinari30). However, the concentration of trans-10-18 : 1 in milk from goats fed MSO (3·2 g/100 g fatty acids) was lower than in milk from cows offered a similar diet (corresponding concentration 7·2)(Reference Roy, Ferlay, Shingfield and Chilliard19), while the reverse was true for trans-11-18 : 1 (8·5 v. 1·4 g/100 g fatty acids). These findings point towards the major pathways of biohydrogenation of unsaturated fatty acids in goats being less influenced by alterations in diet composition compared with the cow, which may be related to a higher rate of salivary secretion(Reference Domingue, Dellow and Barry38) and associated larger buffering capacity, resulting in a more stable rumen pH in goats compared with cows. Direct comparisons of ruminant species fed the same diet would be required to confirm these considerations.

Concentrations of trans-10, cis-12-CLA in milk were enhanced in response to sunflower-seed oil, but the increases were lower for diets based on grassland hay than maize silage. Furthermore, trans-10, cis-12-CLA content in milk from treatment MSO (0·064 g/100 g fatty acids) was higher compared with milk fat from cows fed a similar diet ( < 0·03 g/100 g fatty acids)(Reference Roy, Ferlay, Shingfield and Chilliard19). Across experiments, milk fat trans-10-18 : 1 content was closely associated with trans-10, cis-12-CLA concentrations (y = 41·2x+0·465; n 81; r +0·93; P < 0·001), suggesting that both biohydrogenation intermediates are formed during 18 : 2n-6 metabolism in the rumen, consistent with earlier considerations on the possible role of ruminal biohydrogenation on the regulation of milk fat synthesis(Reference Bauman and Griinari17) and more recent data examining the formation of biohydrogenation intermediates on 18 : 2n-6-rich diets(Reference Shingfield, Ahvenjärvi, Toivonen, Vanhatalo, Huhtanen and Griinari37). However, the slope of the putative precursor–product in this experiment appears lower compared with that between trans-10-18 : 1 and trans-10, cis-12-CLA in bovine milk (y = 356x − 0·41; r +0·95; P < 0·05)(Reference Roy, Ferlay, Shingfield and Chilliard19). This tends to suggest that reduction of biohydrogenation intermediates in the rumen is less extensive in the goat relative to the cow, but direct comparisons of ruminal lipid metabolism in the goat and cow are required to confirm possible between-species differences. Concentrations of trans-10-18 : 1 and trans-10, cis-12-CLA were also significantly associated with iso-17 : 0 in milk (r values 0·72), in direct contrast with measurements reported for studies in cows(Reference Vlaeminck, Fievez, Cabrita, Fonseca and Dewhurst11). Iso-17 : 0 is mainly synthesised by rumen bacteria which exhibit large differences in iso-17 : 0 depending on microbial species(Reference Vlaeminck, Fievez, Demeyer and Dewhurst39). It appears plausible that the relative abundance and proliferation of specific rumen bacterial populations in response to changes in nutrient supply may also differ between ruminant species.

In contrast to cows, plant oils in the diet increase milk fat content and yield in goats(Reference Chilliard, Glasser, Ferlay, Bernard, Rouel and Doreau5, Reference Chilliard, Ferlay, Rouel and Lamberet9). However, milk fat synthesis was not increased on the MSO treatment which may be related to an increase in ruminal formation of biohydrogenation intermediates that limit lipogenic effects of plant lipids in goats, consistent with an increase in milk fat trans-10, cis-12-CLA content. However, post-ruminal infusion studies have provided evidence that the goat is not as responsive to the anti-lipogenic effects of trans-10, cis-12-CLA(Reference de Andrade and Schmidely40) compared with the cow(Reference Baumgard, Corl, Dwyer, Sæbø and Bauman41, Reference Loor and Herbein42). In addition to trans-10, cis-12-CLA(Reference Bauman and Griinari17, Reference Baumgard, Matitashvili, Corl, Dwyer and Bauman43), post-ruminal infusions in lactating cows have provided evidence that cis-10, trans-12-CLA(Reference Sæbø, Sæbø, Griinari and Shingfield44) and trans-9, cis-11-CLA(Reference Perfield, Lock, Griinari, Sæbø, Delmonte, Dwyer and Bauman35) may also exert anti-lipogenic effects and decrease milk fat synthesis. However, these CLA isomers remained very low in goats whatever the dietary treatments in the present study. Differences in milk fat synthesis responses between the goat and cow to changes in diet composition and post-ruminal trans-10, cis-12-CLA infusions suggest species-specific points of regulation of both ruminal and mammary metabolism.

Specific effects of linseed oil

For both experiments, linseed oil resulted in higher enrichment of trans-13,14-18 : 1, trans-16-18 : 1, cis-15-18 : 1, cis-16-18 : 1 and cis-9, trans-13-18 : 2 in milk fat relative to diets containing sunflower-seed oil. Inclusion of linseed oil in grassland hay- or maize silage-based diets resulted in specific increases in milk fat trans-11, trans-13-CLA, trans-12, trans-14-CLA, trans-12, cis-14-CLA, cis-12, trans-14-CLA and trans-11, cis-13-CLA concentrations, which is in line with the studies examining the effects of diet on the CLA isomer distribution in bovine milk fat(Reference Roy, Ferlay, Shingfield and Chilliard19, Reference Collomb, Sieber and Butikofer32). Furthermore, linseed oil in the diet in both experiments enhanced (P < 0·001) milk fat cis-9, trans-12-18 : 2, cis-9, trans-13-18 : 2, trans-9, trans-12-18 : 2, trans-11, trans-15-18 : 2, trans-9, cis-12-18 : 2 and trans-11, cis-15-18 : 2 concentrations, consistent with the changes reported for bovine milk to diets containing linseed oil or linseeds(Reference Shingfield, Chilliard, Toivonen, Kairenius and Givens7), providing further support that specific non-methylene-interrupted 18 : 2 isomers are derived from ruminal 18 : 3n-3 metabolism. Irrespective of forage source, cis-9, trans-13-18 : 2 concentrations were higher on linseed oil (+252 and +383 % for H and M diets, respectively) than sunflower-seed oil (+89 and +88 % for H and M diets, respectively) supplemented diets. This suggests that, in goats as in cows(Reference Roy, Ferlay, Shingfield and Chilliard19), cis-9, trans-13-18 : 2 is derived from the action of Δ9-desaturase in the mammary gland on trans-13-18 : 1 formed during 18 : 3n-3 metabolism in the rumen(Reference Shingfield, Chilliard, Toivonen, Kairenius and Givens7, Reference Destaillats, Trottier, Galvez and Angers45, Reference Glasser, Doreau, Ferlay, Loor and Chilliard46). The present data also indicated that linseed oil in the diet decreases milk 18 : 2n-6 content, which is in agreement with observations in lactating cows(Reference Chilliard, Glasser, Ferlay, Bernard, Rouel and Doreau5).

Concentrations of trans-11, cis-13-CLA were increased by linseed oil in the diet, responses that were higher on hay- than maize silage-based diets and represented the second most abundant CLA isomer, consistent with previous determinations of bovine milk from diets rich in 18 : 3n-3(Reference Roy, Ferlay, Shingfield and Chilliard19, Reference Collomb, Sieber and Butikofer32, Reference Kraft, Collomb, Mockel, Sieber and Jahreis47). Indirect comparisons indicated a higher trans-11, cis-13-CLA concentration in caprine milk on the HLO treatment (0·47 g/100 g fatty acids) compared with milk from cows fed a similar diet (0·20 g/100 g fatty acids)(Reference Roy, Ferlay, Shingfield and Chilliard19). Increases in milk fat 18 : 3n-3 content were confined to the inclusion of linseed oil on maize silage-based diets. These findings would appear to support reduced ruminal 18 : 3n-3 biohydrogenation on diets containing a higher proportion of starch and relatively low amounts of neutral-detergent fibre(Reference Loor, Ueda, Ferlay, Chilliard and Doreau36).

Conclusions

Plant oils in the diet enhanced milk fat synthesis in lactating goats and altered milk fatty acid composition. Changes in milk fatty acid composition were dependent on forage type and plant oil composition, with evidence of an interaction between these nutritional factors. Responses to lipid supplements were characterised as a reduction in fatty acids synthesised de novo (10 : 0–16 : 0) and an increase in 18 : 0, cis-18 : 1, CLA and PUFA concentrations, indicating that plant oils can be used to effect potentially beneficial changes in milk fat composition without inducing detrimental effects on animal performance. Indirect comparisons with published data in cows point towards species differences in the response to dietary lipid supplements that include: (i) a lower propensity for alterations in ruminal biohydrogenation towards trans-10-18 : 1 at the expense of trans-11-18 : 1 in the goat compared with the cow; (ii) no significant occurrence of trans-9, cis-11-CLA and a higher incorporation of trans-9, trans-11-CLA in caprine relative to bovine milk fat; (iii) a lower inhibition of de novo fatty acid synthesis by PUFA in the diet or intermediates formed during ruminal metabolism in the goat relative to the cow. Further research is required to establish the causal mechanisms accounting for inter-species variation in lipogenic responses to dietary plant oil supplements.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported, in part, by the French Ministry of Research and by regional funding (Poitou-Charentes; Effect of the diet and its fat composition on the quality of goats' milk and dairy products, and on yield of fatty acids shown to exert positive effects on human health) within the ‘Aliment Qualité Sécurité’ (no. 2000/F16) research programme. The authors gratefully acknowledge the staff of the ‘Les Cèdres’ Animal Nutrition and Metabolism Unit, Alain Ollier and André Combeau, in particular, for the diligent care of experimental animals and the technical assistance of Pierre Capitan and Vesa Toivonen. All authors contributed to the preparation of the paper and agreed with the submitted manuscript content. There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1Barrionuevo, M, Lopez Aliaga, I, Alferez, MJ, Mesa, E, Nestares, T & Campos, MS (2003) Beneficial effect of goat milk on bioavailability of copper, zinc and selenium in rats. J Physiol Biochem 59, 111118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Chilliard, Y, Rouel, J, Ferlay, A, Bernard, L, Gaborit, P, Raynal-Ljutovac, K, Lauret, A & Leroux, C (2006) Optimising goat's milk and cheese fatty acid composition. In Improving the Fat Content of Foods, pp. 281312 [Williams, C and Buttriss, J, editors]. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Parodi, PW (2005) Dairy product consumption and the risk of breast cancer. J Am Coll Nutr 24, 556S568S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Wahle, KW, Heys, SD & Rotondo, D (2004) Conjugated linoleic acids: are they beneficial or detrimental to health? Prog Lipid Res 43, 553587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Chilliard, Y, Glasser, F, Ferlay, A, Bernard, L, Rouel, J & Doreau, M (2007) Diet, rumen biohydrogenation, cow and goat milk fat nutritional quality. Eur J Lipid Sci Tech 109, 828855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Mensink, RP, Zock, PL, Kester, AD & Katan, MB (2003) Effects of dietary fatty acids and carbohydrates on the ratio of serum total to HDL cholesterol and on serum lipids and apolipoproteins: a meta-analysis of 60 controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr 77, 11461155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Shingfield, KJ, Chilliard, Y, Toivonen, V, Kairenius, P & Givens, DI (2008) Trans fatty acids and bioactive lipids in ruminant milk. Adv Exp Med Biol 606, 365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Jensen, RG (2002) The composition of bovine milk lipids: January 1995 to December 2000. J Dairy Sci 85, 295350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Chilliard, Y, Ferlay, A, Rouel, J & Lamberet, G (2003) A review of nutritional and physiological factors affecting goat milk lipid synthesis and lipolysis. J Dairy Sci 86, 17511770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Dewhurst, RJ, Shingfield, KJ, Lee, MRF & Scolan, ND (2006) Increasing the concentrations of beneficial polyunsaturated fatty acids in milk produced by dairy cows in high-forage systems. Anim Feed Sci Tech 131, 168206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Vlaeminck, B, Fievez, V, Cabrita, ARJ, Fonseca, AJM & Dewhurst, RJ (2006) Factors affecting odd- and branched-chain fatty acids in milk: a review. Anim Feed Sci Tech 131, 389417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Palmquist, DL, Beaulieu, AD & Barbano, DM (1993) Feed and animal factors influencing milk fat composition. J Dairy Sci 76, 17531771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Chilliard, Y & Ferlay, A (2004) Dietary lipids and forages interactions on cow and goat milk fatty acid composition and sensory properties. Reprod Nutr Dev 44, 467492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Hartfoot, CG & Hazlewood, GP (1988) Lipid metabolism in the rumen. In The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem, pp. 285322 [Hobson, PN, editor]. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
15Mosley, EE, Shafii, B, Moate, PJ & McGuire, MA (2006) Cis-9, trans-11 conjugated linoleic acid is synthesized directly from vaccenic acid in lactating dairy cattle. J Nutr 136, 570575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Shingfield, KJ, Ahvenjarvi, S, Toivonen, V, Vanhatalo, A & Huhtanen, P (2007) Transfer of absorbed cis-9, trans-11 conjugated linoleic acid into milk is biologically more efficient than endogenous synthesis from absorbed vaccenic acid in lactating cows. J Nutr 137, 11541160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Bauman, DE & Griinari, JM (2003) Nutritional regulation of milk fat synthesis. Annu Rev Nutr 23, 203227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Shingfield, KJ, Reynolds, CK, Lupoli, B, Toivonen, V, Yurawecz, MP, Delmonte, P, Griinari, JM, Grandison, AS & Beever, DE (2005) Effect of forage type and proportion of concentrate in diet on milk fatty acid composition in cows fed sunflower oil and fish oil. Anim Sci 80, 225238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Roy, A, Ferlay, A, Shingfield, KJ & Chilliard, Y (2006) Examination of the persistency of milk fatty acid composition responses to plant oils in cows fed different basal diets, with particular emphasis on trans-C18:1 fatty acids and isomers of conjugated linoleic acid. Anim Sci 82, 479492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Roncada, P, Gaviraghi, A, Liberatori, S, Canas, B, Bini, L & Greppi, GF (2002) Identification of caseins in goat milk. Proteomics 2, 723726.3.0.CO;2-I>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Grosclaude, F, Ricardeau, G, Martin, P, Remeuf, F, Vassal, L & Bouillon, J (1994) Du gène au fromage: le polymorphisme de la caséine αS1 caprine, ses effets, son évolution (From gene to cheese: the caprine casein αS1 polymorphism, its effects and evolution). INRA Prod Anim 7, 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Chilliard, Y, Rouel, J & Leroux, C (2006) Goat's α-s1 casein genotype influences its milk fatty acid composition and Δ-9 desaturation ratios. Anim Feed Sci Tech 131, 474487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Jarrige, R (1989) Ruminant nutrition. In Recommended Allowance and Feed Table. Paris: INRA.Google Scholar
24Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1997) Official Methods of Analysis, 16th ed. Gaithersburg, MD: AOAC International.Google Scholar
25Folch, J, Lees, M & Sloane Stanley, GH (1957) A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J Biol Chem 226, 497509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26Loor, JJ, Ferlay, A, Ollier, A, Doreau, M & Chilliard, Y (2005) Relationship among trans and conjugated fatty acids and bovine milk fat yield due to dietary concentrate and linseed oil. J Dairy Sci 88, 726740.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27Glass, RL (1971) Alcoholysis, saponification and the preparation of fatty acid methyl esters. Lipids 6, 919925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Shingfield, KJ, Reynolds, CK, Hervas, G, Griinari, JM, Grandison, AS & Beever, DE (2006) Examination of the persistency of milk fatty acid composition responses to fish oil and sunflower oil in the diet of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 89, 714732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29Shingfield, KJ, Ahvenjärvi, S, Toivonen, V, Ärölä, A, Nurmela, KV, Huhtanen, P & Griinari, JM (2003) Effect of dietary fish oil on biohydrogenation of fatty acids and milk fatty acid content in cows. Anim Sci 77, 165179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30Shingfield, KJ & Griinari, JM (2007) Role of biohydrogenation intermediates in milk fat depression. Eur J Lipid Sci Tech 109, 799816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31Bernard, L, Rouel, J, Leroux, C, Ferlay, A, Faulconnier, Y, Legrand, P & Chilliard, Y (2005) Mammary lipid metabolism and milk fatty acid secretion in alpine goats fed vegetable lipids. J Dairy Sci 88, 14781489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32Collomb, M, Sieber, R & Butikofer, U (2004) CLA isomers in milk fat from cows fed diets with high levels of unsaturated fatty acids. Lipids 39, 355364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33Rego, OA, Rosa, HJD, Portugal, PV, Franco, T, Vouzela, CM, Borba, AES & Bessa, RJB (2005) The effects of supplementation with sunflower and soybean oils on the fatty acid profile of milk fat from grazing dairy cows. Anim Res 54, 1724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34Bernard, L, Leroux, C & Chilliard, Y (2008) Expression and nutritional regulation of lipogenic genes in the ruminant lactating mammary gland. Adv Exp Med Biol 606, 67108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35Perfield, JW II, Lock, AL, Griinari, JM, Sæbø, A, Delmonte, P, Dwyer, DA & Bauman, DE (2007) Trans-9, cis-11 conjugated linoleic acid reduces milk fat synthesis in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 90, 22112218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36Loor, JJ, Ueda, K, Ferlay, A, Chilliard, Y & Doreau, M (2004) Biohydrogenation, duodenal flow, and intestinal digestibility of trans fatty acids and conjugated linoleic acids in response to dietary forage:concentrate ratio and linseed oil in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 87, 24722485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37Shingfield, KJ, Ahvenjärvi, S, Toivonen, V, Vanhatalo, A, Huhtanen, P & Griinari, JM (2008) Effect of incremental levels of sunflower-seed oil in the diet on ruminal lipid metabolism in lactating cows. Br J Nutr 99, 971983.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38Domingue, BM, Dellow, DW & Barry, TN (1991) The efficiency of chewing during eating and ruminating in goats and sheep. Br J Nutr 65, 355363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39Vlaeminck, B, Fievez, V, Demeyer, D & Dewhurst, RJ (2006) Effect of forage:concentrate ratio on fatty acid composition of rumen bacteria isolated from ruminal and duodenal digesta. J Dairy Sci 89, 26682678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40de Andrade, PV & Schmidely, P (2005) Effect of duodenal infusion of trans10, cis12-CLA on milk performance and milk fatty acid profile in dairy goats fed high or low concentrate diet in combination with rolled canola seed. Reprod Nutr Dev 46, 3148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41Baumgard, LH, Corl, BA, Dwyer, DA, Sæbø, A & Bauman, DE (2000) Identification of the conjugated linoleic acid isomer that inhibits milk fat synthesis. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 278, R179R184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42Loor, JJ & Herbein, JH (2003) Reduced fatty acid synthesis and desaturation due to exogenous trans10, cis12-CLA in cows fed oleic or linoleic oil. J Dairy Sci 86, 13541369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43Baumgard, LH, Matitashvili, E, Corl, BA, Dwyer, DA & Bauman, DE (2002) Trans-10, cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid decreases lipogenic rates and expression of genes involved in milk lipid synthesis in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 85, 21552163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44Sæbø, A, Sæbø, PC, Griinari, JM & Shingfield, KJ (2005) Effect of abomasal infusions of geometric isomers of 10,12 conjugated linoleic acid on milk fat synthesis in dairy cows. Lipids 40, 823832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45Destaillats, F, Trottier, JP, Galvez, JM & Angers, P (2005) Analysis of α-linolenic acid biohydrogenation intermediates in milk fat with emphasis on conjugated linolenic acids. J Dairy Sci 88, 32313239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46Glasser, F, Doreau, M, Ferlay, A, Loor, J & Chilliard, Y (2007) Milk fatty acids: mammary synthesis could limit transfer from duodenum in cows. Eur J Lipid Sci Tech 109, 817827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47Kraft, J, Collomb, M, Mockel, P, Sieber, R & Jahreis, G (2003) Differences in CLA isomer distribution of cow's milk lipids. Lipids 38, 657664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1 Ingredient and chemical composition of experimental diets

Figure 1

Table 2 Effect of experimental treatment on DM intake, milk yield and milk composition (Mean values with their standard errors for thirteen goats (experiment 1) and fourteen goats (experiment 2))

Figure 2

Table 3 Effect of experimental treatment on milk fatty acid composition (g/100 g fatty acids) (Mean values with their standard errors for thirteen goats (experiment 1) and fourteen goats (experiment 2))

Figure 3

Table 4 Effect of experimental treatment on milk 18 : 1 composition (g/100 g total fatty acids) (Mean values with their standard errors for thirteen goats (experiment 1) and fourteen goats (experiment 2))

Figure 4

Table 5 Effect of experimental treatment on milk 18 : 2 composition (mg/100 g total fatty acids) (Mean values with their standard errors for thirteen goats (experiment 1) and fourteen goats (experiment 2))

Figure 5

Fig. 1 Principal component analysis of data derived from the analysis of eighty-one milk samples. (a) Distribution of samples based on the first two principal components (PC1 and PC2). Each group represents a dietary treatment and each point is the barycentre of data for individual goats. (b) Distribution of samples based on the primary and tertiary principal components (PC1 and PC3). (c) Plot of experimental variables projected on the basis of the first two principal components (PC1 and PC2) that describe the association between milk yield, milk composition and milk fatty acids concentration. Only measured parameters with correlation coefficients ( < − 0·60 or >0·60) for a single principal component are indicated. H, diet based on natural grassland hay (experiment 1) supplemented with no additional oil; HSO, diet based on natural grassland hay (experiment 1) supplemented with sunflower-seed oil; HLO, diet based on natural grassland hay (experiment 1) supplemented with linseed oil; M, diet based on maize silage (experiment 2) supplemented with no additional oil; MSO, diet based on maize silage (experiment 2) supplemented with sunflower-seed oil; MLO, diet based on maize silage (experiment 2) supplemented with linseed oil; c, cis; t, trans.