On December 2, 2017, the Trump administration announced the end of its participation in the Global Compact on Migration, a proposed United Nations commitment that would address global flows of migrants.Footnote 1 Citing American sovereign interests as the reason for withdrawal, U.S. officials stated that the Global Compact on Migration would undermine current U.S. immigration policy focused on border security.Footnote 2
The United States began participating in talks to negotiate the Global Compact on Migration in September 2016, when the Obama administration joined the New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants.Footnote 3 The New York Declaration was adopted in part to launch negotiations for two global compacts: the Global Compact on Refugees and the Global Compact on Migration.Footnote 4 As envisioned in the New York Declaration, the Global Compact on Migration would “set out a range of principles, commitments and understandings among Member States regarding international migration in all its dimensions.”Footnote 5
Despite this prior U.S. involvement in developing the Global Compact on Migration, actions by the Trump administration signaled that an international agreement on migration would not be consistent with its “America First” policy agenda. President Trump decided on December 1 that the United States would not participate in a global conference on migration in Mexico.Footnote 6 The next day, the United States announced its decision to withdraw from participation in the Global Compact on Migration, noting that the New York Declaration contained several provisions “inconsistent with U.S. immigration policy and the Trump Administration's immigration principles.”Footnote 7 Specifically, Ambassador Nikki Haley, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, explained:
America is proud of our immigrant heritage and our long-standing moral leadership in providing support to migrant and refugee populations across the globe. No country has done more than the United States, and our generosity will continue. But our decisions on immigration policies must always be made by Americans and Americans alone. We will decide how best to control our borders and who will be allowed to enter our country. The global approach in the New York Declaration is simply not compatible with U.S. sovereignty.Footnote 8
The next day, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson issued a statement with a similar tone:
While we will continue to engage on a number of fronts at the United Nations, in this case, we simply cannot in good faith support a process that could undermine the sovereign right of the United States to enforce our immigration laws and secure our borders.Footnote 9
To date, the Trump administration has not announced a comparable withdrawal from the Global Compact on Refugees.
The decision to leave the Global Compact on Migration follows other measures by the Trump administration to restrict entry into the United States in the name of national security. Indeed, the withdrawal reinforced what has been called “an atmosphere of renewed American isolationism and exceptionalism at the United Nations in the first year of the Trump White House.”Footnote 10 Among other things, the Trump administration restricted the entry of nationals from several predominantly Muslim countries into the United States and capped refugee admissions at 45,000 for Fiscal Year 2018—the lowest cap since 1980.Footnote 11 Comments by Trump further underscore his administration's “America First” stance on immigration, including an alleged profanity in relation to immigrants from Haiti, El Salvador, and African countries.Footnote 12
Despite the Trump administration's withdrawal from the Global Compact on Migration, several American cities have petitioned to join the process and provide collective input.Footnote 13 The mayors of eighteen U.S. cities, including Chicago, Los Angeles, New York, Philadelphia, and the District of Columbia, signed a position paper along with more than 130 mayors from cities across the world in hopes of formally contributing to both Global Compacts.Footnote 14 The paper urged nations and international organizations to “[s]ee cities as partners in defining and implementing international instruments related to migration” and “[g]ive cities a seat at the table in the discussions that will lead into the negotiations of the Compacts.”Footnote 15 The New York City Mayor's Office of Immigrant Affairs explained the desire to participate: “We need to be part of U.N. decision-making if international agreements are to be responsive to on-the-ground realities.”Footnote 16