Colorectal cancer is a common cancer in Australia, causing approximately 4000 deaths per year(1). Conventional treatment is with cytotoxic drugs; however, these damage the normal tissue and have limitations when the cancer has an increased resistance to chemotherapy. Cancer prevention and treatment by phytochemicals that inhibit the growth of cancers are a possible alternative strategy. Cancers in the gastrointestinal tract are amongst those most responsive to dietary modulation as gastrointestinal cancers can be in direct contact with bioactives present in food.
Generally, the growth of cancer cells exceeds that of normal cells due to malfunctioning of their proliferation and death controls and therefore agents that modulate proliferation and cell death have promise as anti-cancer therapeutics. Epidemiological studies have shown that the presence of phenolic compounds in fruit and vegetables contributes to the maintenance of health (for a review, see Halliwell(Reference Halliwell2)). There is a correlation between the total phenolics of fruit and the antioxidant capacity(Reference Netzel, Netzel and Tian3). Polyphenols have potent antioxidant activity and play a role in the prevention of diseases such as cancer(Reference Di Domenico, Foppoli and Coccia4–Reference Stoner, Chen and Kresty7), via protecting cells against oxidative damage and therefore preventing the damaging effects of free radicals on DNA(Reference Rice-Evans, Miller and Paganga8). Anthocyanins are an example of phenolic compounds that inhibit cancer cell growth(Reference Wu, Koponen and Mykkänen9). They are one of the main classes of flavonoids and contribute significantly to the antioxidant activities of fruits and vegetables. Anthocyanin-rich berry extracts inhibit the growth of colon cancer cells in vitro (Reference Yi, Fischer and Krewer10, Reference Malik, Zhao and Schoene11), with two previous studies suggesting little to no cytotoxic effects on non-tumorigenic cells(Reference Malik, Zhao and Schoene11, Reference Zhao, Giusti and Malik12). The anthocyanidins delphinidin and cyanidin cause apoptosis as well as alterations to the cell cycle in cancer cells(Reference Lazzè, Savio and Pizzala13). Other mechanisms of anti-cancer effects for fruit bioactives include anti-inflammatory properties(Reference Tan, Houc and Konczak14), modulation of gene expression(Reference Wu, Koponen and Mykkänen9, Reference Boivin, Blanchette and Barrette15) and induction of apoptosis(Reference Wu, Koponen and Mykkänen9, Reference Yi, Fischer and Krewer10, Reference Seeram, Adams and Zhang16).
Due to their high content of phenolic compounds, most studies investigating anti-cancer properties of fruit have been done with berries; however, native Australian fruits have served as a source of food and medicine for the indigenous population for thousands of years, but limited data on the nutritional and health benefits have been produced(Reference Netzel, Netzel and Tian3). The native Australian bush fruit Illawarra plum (Podocarpus elatus Endl., Podocarpaceae) has a high content of anthocyanin-rich phenolics (phenolic and anthocyanin levels are 2·4- and 1·7-fold higher, respectively, than that of blueberry(Reference Netzel, Netzel and Tian3, Reference Konczak, Zabaras and Xiao17)), with an oxygen radical-scavenging ability 146 % of blueberry(Reference Konczak, Zabaras and Xiao17). A previous study showed Illawarra plum to have anti-proliferative activity and cause apoptosis of cancer cells(Reference Konczak, Zabaras and Xiao17). The present study was designed to confirm these investigations, to investigate the underlying molecular mechanisms and to identify the nutrient–genome interactions with colon cancer cells.
Methods
Chemicals
All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, unless otherwise stated. The Illawarra plum used throughout these studies was a polyphenolic-rich extract (acidified methanol extraction(Reference Netzel, Netzel and Tian3, Reference Terahara, Koncak-Islam and Nakatni18), purified twice on an XAD-7HP column and freeze-dried to produce a lyophilised powder) provided by Dr I. Konczak (CSIRO). Illawarra plum has previously been characterised as containing the anthocyanins cyanidin 3-glucoside (330 mg/g), pelargonidin 3-glucoside (6·0 mg/g) and delphinidin 3-glucoside (1·8 mg/g). It also contains quercetin glucoside (5·8 mg/g) and luteolin (22·5 mg/g)(Reference Konczak, Zabaras and Xiao17).
Cells and cell culture conditions
HT-29 human colorectal cancer cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection and non-tumorigenic young adult mouse colon (YAMC)(Reference Jat, Noble and Ataliotis19, Reference Whitehead, VanEeden and Noble20) cells were generously provided by The Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd. Cell line characterisation was done by microscopically monitoring cell morphology. HT-29 cells were cultured in McCoy's 5A modified medium with NaHCO3, supplemented with 5 % fetal bovine serum (In Vitro Technologies), 1 % penicillin/streptomycin (10 000 units penicillin, 10 mg/ml streptomycin) and 1 % l-glutamine (200 mm). Cells were maintained at 37°C with 5 % CO2. Cells were split (with trypsin-EDTA) and sub-cultured or seeded into plates when they were at 70–80 % confluency.
YAMC cells were grown under permissive conditions at 33°C with 5 % CO2, where the temperature-sensitive simian vacuolating virus 40 (SV40) large T antigen is active and drives cell proliferation. At higher temperatures the antigen yields an inactive protein and the cells behave as differentiated colonic epithelial cells that undergo apoptosis if they achieve maximal confluence(Reference Fenton, Hord and Lavigne21). The detailed growth conditions were as follows. Cells were cultured on collagen I-coated flasks at 33°C in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 medium supplemented with 5 % fetal bovine serum, 1 % penicillin/streptomycin (10 000 units penicillin, 10 mg/ml streptomycin), 1 % l-glutamine (200 mm), 1 % Insulin, Transferrin, Selenium, Sodium Pyruvate (ITS-A) solution (containing 1 g/l insulin, 0·55 g/l transferrin, 0·67 mg/l sodium selenite anhydrous) and 5 U/ml murine recombinant interferon-γ (Jomar Diagnostics). When cells reached about 70 % confluence they were transferred to non-permissive conditions. They were seeded on collagen I-coated plates in serum-free and interferon-γ-free medium, and incubated at 37°C. They were maintained under these conditions for 48 h before experimental use.
Effect of Illawarra plum on cell proliferation
HT-29 cells seeded in ninety-six-well plates were treated with Illawarra plum extract in culture medium (0–2000 μg/ml) for 1–48 h, followed by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay(Reference Mosmann22) to assess cell proliferation. YAMC cells were treated with Illawarra plum extract (0–1000 μg/ml) for 24 h to assess the effect on non-tumorigenic cells. Briefly, treatments were removed from the cells and 500 μg/ml MTT was added. Following 2·5 h incubation, 10 % SDS in 10 mm-HCl was added to solubilise the formazan crystals. The number of surviving cells was directly proportional to the level of the formazan product created, which was quantified with a spectrophotometer (SpectraMax 250; Molecular Devices), with absorbance measured at 600 nm (reference wavelength 650 nm). Optical density values from ‘blank’ wells (that contained no cells but had still been treated with the varying concentrations of plum) were subtracted from the results. Cell growth with treatment was expressed as a percentage of the non-treated cells.
Effect of Illawarra plum on the cell cycle
HT-29 cells were treated with Illawarra plum extract (0–1000 μg/ml) for 24 h, then released from the wells with TrypLe Express (Gibco BRL). Wells were rinsed with PBS and cells were centrifuged at 410 g for 5 min. The supernatant fraction was removed and cells were re-suspended in PBS and cold 70 % ethanol was added. Cells were stored at − 20°C until analysed for cell cycle on a flow cytometer (BD FACSCaliburTM; BD Biosciences). For analysis, cells were centrifuged and rinsed with PBS, followed by re-suspension of the cell pellet in 1 ml propidium iodide stain (2 % propidium iodide, 0·1 % Triton X-100 and 4 mg Rnase, all in PBS) in the dark for 1 h at room temperature. Cells were run through the flow cytometer and a total of 15 000 events per sample were captured. The proportion of cells in G0/G1, S, G2/M and pre-G0/G1 were determined as previously described(Reference Darzynkiewicz and Huang23).
Biomarkers of DNA damage
To assess the effect of Illawarra plum extract on cell morphology and markers of DNA damage, the cytokinesis-block micronucleus (CBMN) cytome assay was performed as previously described for lymphocytes(Reference Fenech24) but with some minor modifications. HT-29 cells were treated with Illawarra plum extract (0–1000 μg/ml) for 24 h. Treatments were removed and 4·5 μg/ml cytochalasin-B was added to the cells with media for a further 24 h. Cells were then released from wells with TrypLe Express, followed by suspension in media. Cells (100 μl) were added to a cytospin cup and centrifuged (600 rpm, 5 min) on to glass slides. Following 10 min air-drying, cells were fixed in methanol and stained with the Diff Quik staining kit (Lab Aids Pty Ltd). Cells were scored for damage with a 100 × objective with oil (Leica DM LB2 with Spot software; PathTech) as previously described(Reference Fenech24). Briefly, cytotoxicity and cytostasis was assessed by determining the number of necrotic and apoptotic cells, as well as the number of dividing cells (mono-, bi- and multinucleated) (average of 600 cells per slide were assessed). DNA damage was scored by determining the number of binucleated cells (out of >500 binucleated cells) containing micronuclei, nucleoplasmic bridges and nuclear buds(Reference Fenech24). Other abnormal cellular and nuclear morphological anomalies unique to the present study were noted.
To further assess morphological changes, slides (prepared as above) were stained with Feulgen and light green stain. Slides were placed in 5 m-HCl for 30 min, then Schiff's reagent for 60 min, then counter-stained with 0·2 % light green (w/v) for 30 s. Slides were viewed with a 100 × objective with oil under transmitted light microscopy (the nuclei are magenta in color, whereas the cytoplasm is pale blue/green) and fluorescent microscopy with a far-red filter (DNA appears bright red).
DNA damage was also assessed by measuring telomere length following a quantitative real-time PCR protocol(Reference O'Callaghan, Dhillon and Thomas25). HT-29 cells were treated with Illawarra plum extract (0–1000 μg/ml) for 24 h. DNA was isolated using the Qiagen Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions and quantified (NanoDrop Technologies). For each DNA sample, real-time PCR was performed using primers for telomere length analysis and for 36b4 (single copy gene, Table 1), with SYBR (Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) using the Applied Biosystems 7300 Real-Time PCR System. A standard curve of 1·18 × 103− 1·18 × 108 kb of telomere sequence was included. The parameter threshold was defined as the fractional cycle number at which the fluorescence passed a fixed threshold above the baseline value (cycle threshold; CT). Telomere length was determined from the telomere standard curve, while genome copy numbers were determined from an established standard curve(Reference O'Callaghan, Dhillon and Thomas25). Absolute telomere length was expressed as kb telomere/genome.
To assess if Illawarra plum extract was having any affect on histone structure, the histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity assay was performed. HT-29 cells were treated with Illawarra plum extract (0–500 μg/ml) for 24 h. The Fleur de Lys HDAC fluorometric assay (BIOMOL International, through Sapphire Bioscience) was used according to the manufacturer's instructions. Results were expressed as relative fluorescence units.
Gene expression
To determine the effect of Illawarra plum extract treatment on expression of genes related to HDAC activity, telomere length and apoptosis, HT-29 cells were treated with extract (0–500 μg/ml) for 24 h. Total RNA was extracted from the cells using Trizol (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions, and quantity and quality of RNA were assessed (NanoDrop). RNA was reversed transcribed using the SuperScript III First-strand synthesis system (Invitrogen) and real-time PCR was performed with Taqman master mix and primers for sirtuin 1 (SIRT1; Hs01009005_m1), telomerase RT (hTERT; Hs00972656_m1) and tumour protein p53 (TP53; Hs01034249_m1) (Applied Biosystems). Amplification of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH; Hs02758991_g1) (Applied Biosystems) was included as an endogenous control. Relative mRNA expression levels were calculated with the formula 2− ΔΔCT where the CT of the target gene was normalised to GAPDH expression and expressed relative to the control group(Reference Livak and Schmittgen26).
Statistical analysis
All studies were conducted in triplicate and repeated on at least three independent occasions. Data are expressed as mean values with their standard errors. Analysis was with an unpaired Student's t test, or a one-way ANOVA with the Holm–Sidak post hoc test when statistical significance was found (P< 0·05). Statistical analysis was performed with Sigmaplot 11.0 (Systat Software, Inc.).
Results
Effect of Illawarra plum on cell proliferation
Cell proliferation of HT-29 cells was slightly increased with low concentrations of Illawarra plum extract, but decreased with higher concentrations in a time- and dose-dependent manner (P< 0·001; Fig. 1(a)). The concentration of extract required to cause 50 % growth inhibition was 4001, 1479 and 1318 μg/ml for 1, 24 and 48 h of treatment, respectively. Treatment of YAMC cells with Illawarra plum extract did not significantly decrease their viability, but promoted growth at the highest concentrations assessed (P< 0·05; Fig. 1(b)).
Effect of Illawarra plum on the cell cycle
Treatment of Illawarra plum extract caused a significant dose-dependent decrease in the population of cells in the G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle and an increase in the number in the S phase (P< 0·001; Fig. 2). There was also an increase in the pre-G0/G1 peak that is considered to be apoptotic cells (P< 0·001; Fig. 2).
Markers of cytotoxicity, cytostasis and DNA damage
Microscopic analysis of HT-29 cells following the CBMN cytome assay showed that increasing concentrations of treatment with Illawarra plum extract caused a decrease in the number of proliferating cells. The nuclear division index ( = (mononucleated+(binucleated × 2)+(multinucleated × 3))/total viable cells) significantly decreased from 1·23 (sem 0·02) in control cells to 1·12 (sem 0·01) in cells treated with 1000 μg/ml Illawarra plum extract (P< 0·01). There was also a dose-dependent increase in cytotoxicity, with a significant increase in the proportion of apoptotic and necrotic cells (Fig. 3(a); P< 0·01).
Biomarkers of DNA damage were only quantified for non-treated and 100 μg/ml extract-treated cells, due to higher levels of plum reducing the number of binucleated cells to a level too low for accurate analysis. Illawarra plum extract increased the number of binucleated cells containing micronuclei, nucleoplasmic bridges and nuclear buds by approximately 2-fold (P< 0·05; Fig. 3(b)). It was also observed that following 24 h treatment with Illawarra plum extract, many of the cell cytoplasms contained vacuoles (Fig. 3(d)), and a high proportion of the nuclear buds were being engulfed by these vacuoles, suggesting autophagy(Reference Krick, Mühe and Prick27) (Fig. 3(e)). In the plum extract-treated cells there was a 4·5-fold increase in the number of nuclear buds within vacuoles compared with non-treated cells (Fig. 3(c); P< 0·0001).
Treatment with Illawarra plum extract also caused other morphological changes. With increasing concentrations of plum extract, there was an increase in the proportion of cells that had a shrunken/compacted nucleus, an intense staining colour and a greatly reduced cytoplasmic volume (Fig. 4(a)–(d)). The nuclear diameter was significantly less than that of the morphologically normal mononucleated cells (9·2 (sem 0·1) v. 15·1 (sem 0·2) μm; P< 0·001). The affected cells all had condensed nuclei, but were not only in the mononucleus form: on average 84 % were mononucleated, 13 % were binucleated and 3 % were undergoing apoptosis. When stained with Feulgen and light green, these cells had a more intense stain (the DNA being stained) compared with cells with a normal morphology (Fig. 4(e) and (f)).
Due to the appearance of condensed nuclei of HT-29 cells with Illawarra plum extract treatment, it was investigated whether this was due to increased HDAC activity. Analysis showed that Illawarra plum treatment caused a dose-dependent increase in HDAC activity (Fig. 5(a); P< 0·001).
Telomere length following treatment with Illawarra plum extract was assessed as another marker of DNA damage. It was found to decrease with increasing concentrations of plum extract, becoming significant following 24 h of 1000 μg/ml treatment (Fig. 5(b); P< 0·005).
Discussion
Disruptions to the normal regulation of cell division and death are underlying mechanisms of the development of cancer. There are a number of strategies that have been investigated to combat the molecular changes with cancer development; however, in the present study we focused on the effects of a polyphenolic-rich fruit extract on proliferation and apoptosis controlled at the genome level. The success of cancer therapies relies on the extent of their ability to induce death of tumour cells while allowing survival of healthy cells. Illawarra plum extract decreased proliferation in the HT-29 cells, but not in the non-tumorigenic YAMC cells. The decreased proliferation in cancer cells was via changes to the cell cycle, and by decreased gene expression of hTERT which was associated with a decrease in cell telomere length. Illawarra plum treatment of HT-29 cells also increased apoptosis and caused other genome changes including increased numbers of biomarkers for genomic damage, condensed nuclei via increased HDAC activity, and an increased population of cells containing cytoplasmic vacuoles, suggestive of autophagy.
Illawarra plum extract decreased cell proliferation in HT-29 cells, but promoted proliferation in YAMC cells. Whilst the mechanisms underlying the enhanced proliferation in the YAMC cells with the higher concentrations of extract are currently unknown, an inhibition of proliferation of HT-29 cells has been previously found with Illawarra plum extract(Reference Konczak, Zabaras and Xiao17) as well as with other phenolic-rich fruit extracts(Reference Wu, Koponen and Mykkänen9, Reference Yi, Fischer and Krewer10, Reference Seeram, Adams and Zhang16). Inhibition of proliferation is thought to be correlated with anthocyanin content of the fruit(Reference Wu, Koponen and Mykkänen9, Reference Seeram, Adams and Zhang16), of which Illawarra plum has high levels. The dose-dependent decrease in cell viability would have been contributed to by the increased apoptosis and necrosis, and alterations to the cell cycle that was observed following plum treatment. Plum extract decreased the number of cells in the G0/G1 phase and increased those in the S phase. Phenolic-rich extracts and anthocyanins have also been shown to decrease the proportion of cells in the G0/G1 phase(Reference Lazzè, Savio and Pizzala13) and cause cell cycle arrest in the S phase(Reference González-Sarrías, Li and Seeram28). The accumulation in the S phase suggests a block in the transition from S to G2 phase, which would cause an overall delay in the cell cycle and a decrease in cell proliferation. Inhibition of abnormal cell cycle progression via modulation of cell cycle progression is an important strategy for chemoprevention as well as chemotherapy(Reference Kundu and Surh29). An accumulation of cells within a certain phase of the cell cycle can improve cancer treatment options, for example, cells synchronised in the S and G2/M phases are more sensitive to doxorubicin (an anti-tumour antibiotic) than cells in the G1 phase(Reference Ling, el-Naggar and Priebe30).
In addition to changes in the cell cycle, the decreased cell proliferation could be contributed to by changes in telomere length. Telomeres are maintained by telomerase, a ribonucleoprotein enzyme that includes a RT component (hTERT) and a RNA template component(Reference Blackburn31). In tumour cells, telomerase is highly activated which can lead to unlimited proliferation; therefore relatively new research involves the screening of natural products with telomerase inhibitor activity as potential anti-cancer agents. Treatment with Illawarra plum extract caused a decrease in both hTERT expression and in telomere length. Other plant bioactives have also shown promise at inhibiting telomerase activity(Reference Ramachandran, Fonseca and Jhabvala32). Inhibition of telomerase results in telomere shortening, repressed proliferation, and an altered cell cycle, leading to apoptosis(Reference Boklan, Nanjangud and MacKenzie33). Therefore repression of telomerase is an early event in the apoptotic cascade; however, it appears that telomere length must first decrease to a critical length to induce apoptosis. In addition, a decrease in telomere length beyond a critical point could also drive the cells into senescence(Reference Harley, Futcherand and Greider34), contributing to the lower cell proliferation found in the present study.
Apoptosis is a form of programmed cell death and is a major mechanism for cancer suppression(Reference Seeram, Adams and Zhang16). Treatment with Illawarra plum extract for 24 h caused a significant increase in apoptosis, with concordance in results between the two measuring techniques applied – microscopy with the CBMN cytome assay and flow cytometry. Many studies have not quantified apoptosis as they have used the DNA fragmentation method to assess for apoptosis; but, overall, findings suggest that anthocyanin-rich extracts increase levels of apoptosis in cancer cell lines(Reference Wu, Koponen and Mykkänen9, Reference Seeram, Adams and Zhang16). The increase in apoptosis induced by Illawarra plum extract was independent of p53, as there was no significant change in p53 expression, and HT-29 cells express a mutant p53 that is inactive.
The present study also found that plum treatment resulted in high numbers of cells with altered morphology. These cells were found to represent almost 70 % of the cell population following treatment with 1000 μg/ml Illawarra plum extract. These were not necrotic cells, as the two could be distinguished microscopically with the CBMN cytome assay. Even though they had condensed nuclei and shrunken cytoplasm, these cells still appeared to be viable, and were observed to be in the same stages of growth as the non-affected cells (i.e. equivalent numbers found to be mono- and binucleated). Most of these cells had high numbers of cytoplasmic vacuoles, possibly indicative of autophagy, a form of cell death with its main feature being the engulfing of cytoplasmic fractions followed by their degradation(Reference Lant and Storey35). Starvation is an initiating condition of autophagy, as this will be triggered to recover precursor molecules, limiting the energetic expense of resynthesis. It is possible that the addition of high levels of plum extract in the cell culture media induced a ‘starvation’ or energy restriction mimetic condition such as that previously reported with resveratrol which also promotes autophagy(Reference Morselli, Mariño and Bennetzen36). A number of studies have now shown that under starvation, SIRT1 expression increases(Reference Cohen, Miller and Bitterman37) and that SIRT1 activity is necessary for starvation-induced autophagy(Reference Lee, Cao and Mostoslavsky38). In the present study we observed a trend for an increase in SIRT1 expression with Illawarra plum treatment.
The cells with morphological alterations were also shown to have an intensely stained nucleus. Whilst the increased vacuoles suggest autophagy, a condensed nucleus might allude to a change to histone binding. We investigated this by measuring HDAC activity. Potential anti-cancer agents are often investigated for their ability to be HDAC inhibitors, as it is hypothesised that inhibitors should reactivate tumour suppressor genes that are silenced during neoplastic development. Following plum treatment, however, there was a dose-dependent increase in HDAC activity. It is possible that an increase in HDAC activity may be silencing the genes required for tumour progression(Reference Akare, Jean-Louis and Chen39), and that loss of acetylation may suppress genes associated with cell cycle progression(Reference Bandyopadhyay and Medrano40). Other natural agents (such as the bile acid ursodeoxycholic acid(Reference Akare, Jean-Louis and Chen39)) increase HDAC activity and induce apoptosis in cancer cells. Interestingly, treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid caused other results comparable with our findings including a low level of apoptosis, inhibition of telomerase activity, decreased proliferation, as well as morphological changes of flattened vacuolated structures in approximately 75 % of cells(Reference Akare, Jean-Louis and Chen39).
The CBMN cytome assay with microscopic analysis also showed a decrease in proliferation, with the number of binucleated cells decreasing with increasing concentrations of Illawarra plum. This supports the idea of cytostasis which could be induced by Illawarra plum decreasing telomerase expression and pushing cells into senescence or apoptosis. In addition to this, the CBMN cytome assay showed that Illawarra plum extract caused an increase in micronuclei, nucleoplasmic bridges and nuclear buds, which are all biomarkers for genotoxic damage and chromosomal instability (for a review, see Fenech et al. (Reference Fenech, Kirsch-Volders and Natarajan41)). Following treatment it was also observed that many of the nuclear buds were associated with vacuoles. A ‘starvation’ condition, that may have occurred with plum treatment, has also been found to cause vesicles containing part of the nucleus to pinch off into vacuoles(Reference Krick, Mühe and Prick27). This has been termed ‘piecemeal microautophagy of the nucleus’ and is likely to be what we observed with the nuclear buds in vacuoles following Illawarra plum extract treatment. Additionally, the increase in nuclear budding from plum treatment may have been associated with the accumulation of cells in the S phase, as during this part of the cell cycle amplified DNA is localised to the periphery of the nucleus and is eliminated via nuclear buds(Reference Shimizu, Shimuara and Tanaka42). It has been hypothesised that nuclear budding is a mechanism to eliminate excess chromosomes or unresolved DNA repair complexes (for a review, see Fenech et al. (Reference Fenech, Kirsch-Volders and Natarajan41)), indicating DNA repair or a nuclear housekeeping process. Shimizu et al. (Reference Shimizu, Kanda and Wahl43) also showed that induction of nuclear budding by hydroxyurea promotes the elimination of amplified oncogenes in cancer cells; whether a similar effect is induced by Illawara plum extract remains to be tested.
The results from the present study on the effects of Illawarra plum on colon cancer cells (suppression of cell proliferation, cell cycle arrest, and induction of apoptosis) are all positive findings for chemopreventive and anti-tumour activity, and are likely to be driven by the high phenolic content and antioxidant capacity of Illawarra plum. An agent that can target the multiple biochemical pathways that are involved in the development of cancer has many advantages. In conclusion, the results from the present study encourage further studies to investigate the chemotherapeutic effects of Illawarra plum using in vivo models.
Acknowledgements
E. L. S. was supported by a CJ Martin post-doctoral fellowship (salary) awarded by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (no. 357702). The research project received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. E. L. S., I. K. and M. F. designed the research; I. K. provided methodology and essential reagents; E. L. S. conducted the research; E. L. S. and M. F. analysed the data; E. L. S. wrote the paper and had primary responsibility for final content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. The authors have no conflicts of interest.