Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:43:35.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Invasiveness Index as a Predictor of Surgical Site Infection after Spinal Fusion, Revision Fusion, or Laminectomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2016

Brian L. Hollenbeck ,
Kevin J. McGuire ,
Andrew P. White ,
David S. Yassa  and
Sharon B. Wright
Brian L. Hollenbeck*
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
Kevin J. McGuire
Affiliation:
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston, Massachusetts
Andrew P. White
Affiliation:
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston, Massachusetts
David S. Yassa
Affiliation:
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Division of Infection Control/ Hospital Epidemiology, Silverman Institute for Health Care Quality and Safety, Boston, Massachusetts
Sharon B. Wright
Affiliation:
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Division of Infection Control/ Hospital Epidemiology, Silverman Institute for Health Care Quality and Safety, Boston, Massachusetts
*
Address correspondence to Brian L. Hollenbeck, MD, New England Baptist Hospital, Division of Infectious Diseases, 125 Parker Hill Ave, Converse #600, Boston, MA 02120 (bhollenb@nebh.org).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate invasiveness index as a potential predictor of spine surgical site infection (SSI) after spinal fusion, revision fusion, or laminectomy.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Single, large, academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Adults undergoing spinal fusion, revision fusion, or laminectomy.

METHODS

Data were obtained from electronic hospital databases; cases of SSI were extracted from the infection control database using National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) definitions. For each case, an invasiveness index, determined by surgical approach, procedure, and number of spine levels treated, was calculated using current procedural terminology (CPT) billing codes. Statistical analyses were performed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models.

RESULTS

In total, 3,143 patients met inclusion criteria, and 43 of these developed SSI. Multivariate regression showed that advanced age (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.005–1.05, for each year of life) and invasiveness index (medium invasiveness index OR, 5.36; 95% CI, 1.92–14.96; high invasiveness index OR, 14.1; 95% CI, 4.38–45.43) were significant predictors of infection. In subgroup analyses of spinal fusion patients, morbid obesity (OR, 2.542; 95% CI, 1.08–5.99), trauma (OR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.05–5.55), and invasiveness index (medium invasiveness index OR, 5.39; 95% CI, 1.56–18.61; high invasiveness index OR, 13.44; 95% CI, 3.28–55.01) were significant predictors of SSI. Models containing invasiveness index were compared to NHSN models and demonstrated similar performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Invasiveness index is a predictor of SSI after spinal fusion and performs similarly to NHSN models. Invasiveness index shows promise as a potential risk stratification tool that is easily calculated and is available preoperatively.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016:1–7

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , January 2017 , pp. 11 - 17
Copyright
© 2016 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

PREVIOUS PRESENTATION. These data were presented as an Abstract at IDWeek 2014 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on October 10, 2014. EP 1009.

References

REFERENCES

1. Jenks, PJ, Laurent, M, McQuarry, S, Watkins, R. Clinical and economic burden of surgical site infection (SSI) and predicted financial consequences of elimination of SSI from an English hospital. J Hosp Infect 2014;86:24–33.Google Scholar
2. Mu, Y, Edwards, JR, Horan, TC, Berrios-Torres, SI, Fridkin, SK. Improving risk-adjusted measures of surgical site infection for the national healthcare safety network. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32:970–986.Google Scholar
3. Nota, SP, Braun, Y, Ring, D, Schwab, JH. Incidence of surgical site infection after spine surgery: What is the impact of the definition of infection? Clin Orthop Rel Res 2015;473:1612–1619.Google Scholar
4. Cizik, AM, Lee, MJ, Martin, BI, et al. Using the spine surgical invasiveness index to identify risk of surgical site infection: a multivariate analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94:335–342.Google Scholar
5. Watanabe, M, Sakai, D, Matsuyama, D, Yamamoto, Y, Sato, M, Mochida, J. Risk factors for surgical site infection following spine surgery: efficacy of intraoperative saline irrigation. J Neurosurg Spine 2010;12:540–546.Google Scholar
6. Pull ter Gunne, AF, Cohen, DB. Incidence, prevalence, and analysis of risk factors for surgical site infection following adult spinal surgery. Spine 2009;34:1422–1428.Google Scholar
7. Tenney, JH, Vlahov, D, Salcman, M, Ducker, TB. Wide variation in risk of wound infection following clean neurosurgery. Implications for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. J Neurosurg 1985;62:243–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Klein, JD, Hey, LA, Yu, CS, et al. Perioperative nutrition and postoperative complications in patients undergoing spinal surgery. Spine 1996;21:2676–2682.Google Scholar
9. Olsen, MA, Mayfield, J, Lauryssen, C, et al. Risk factors for surgical site infection in spinal surgery. J Neurosurg 2003;98:149–155.Google Scholar
10. Friedman, ND, Sexton, DJ, Connelly, SM, Kaye, KS. Risk factors for surgical site infection complicating laminectomy. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007;28:1060–1065.Google Scholar
11. Levi, AD, Dickman, CA, Sonntag, VK. Management of postoperative infections after spinal instrumentation. J Neurosurg 1997;86:975–980.Google Scholar
12. Boston, KM, Baraniuk, S, O’Heron, S, Murray, KO. Risk factors for spinal surgical site infection, Houston, Texas. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009;30:884–889.Google Scholar
13. Radcliff, KE, Rasouli, MR, Neusner, A, et al. Preoperative delay of more than 1 hour increases the risk of surgical site infection. Spine 2013;38:1318–1323.Google Scholar
14. Thakkar, V, Ghobrial, GM, Maulucci, CM, et al. Nasal MRSA colonization: impact on surgical site infection following spine surgery. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2014;125:94–97.Google Scholar
15. Xing, D, Ma, JX, Ma, XL, et al. A methodological, systematic review of evidence-based independent risk factors for surgical site infections after spinal surgery. Eur Spine J 2013;22:605–615.Google Scholar
16. McGregor, JC, Harris, AD. The need for advancements in the field of risk adjustment for healthcare-associated infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;35:8–9.Google Scholar
17. Surveillance for Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Events. Center for Disease Control and Prevention website. http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/acute-care-hospital/ssi/index.html. Published 2015. Accessed on August 25, 2014.Google Scholar
18. Mirza, SK, Martin, BI, Goodkin, R, Hart, RA, Anderson, PA. Developing a toolkit for comparing safety in spine surgery. Instruct Course Lect 2014;63:271–286.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Hollenbeck supplementary material

Hollenbeck supplementary material 1

Download Hollenbeck supplementary material(File)
File 14.7 KB