Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:09:13.932Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Refining the chronology and distribution of mid-fifteenth to mid-seventeenth century Indian Ocean world glass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2021

Jennifer Craig Open the ORCID record for Jennifer Craig [Opens in a new window]
Jennifer Craig*
Affiliation:
Indian Ocean World Centre, McGill University, Canada (✉ jlocraig@gmail.com)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Morphological and compositional analysis of glass beads from three shipwrecks in the Indian Ocean world has increased our understanding of the chronology and distribution of mid-fifteenth to mid-seventeenth century glass.

Keywords

Indian Ocean worldglass beadscompositional analysisdistribution
Type
Project Gallery
Information
Antiquity , Volume 95 , Issue 384 , December 2021 , e35
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Antiquity Publications Ltd.

This article merges regionalised studies on glass material in the Indian Ocean world, a geographic area expanding from East Africa, across the Middle East, Asia and Southeast Asia, to the western Pacific Ocean. The archaeological sites discussed here are shipwrecks. The date ranges of the sites are deduced from the cargo artefact assemblages, which probably span both the time the ship sailed and its wrecking. The morphological and compositional analysis of 41, 26 and 18 glass beads from the shipwrecks Pandanan (AD 1460–1487), Santa Cruz (AD 1488–1505) and Royal Captain Shoal wreck 2 (AD 1573–1620), respectively, has added evidence to previously held hypotheses on drawn soda-alumina and wound lead-potash glass beads. The morphological analysis includes observation of colour, size and the manufacturing style of glass beads by the direction of striations in relation to the bead bore: drawn beads are parallel and wound beads are perpendicular. The compositional analysis was performed using laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS).

Compositional analysis on archaeological glass has produced multiple groups of soda-alumina glass (Dussubieux et al. Reference Dussubieux, Gratuze and Blet-Lemarquand2010; Dussubieux & Gratuze Reference Dussubieux, Gratuze and Janssens2013) and has recently identified two groups of lead-potash glass (Carter et al. Reference Carter, Dussubieux, Polkinghorne and Pottier2019). Of relevance to this study are the soda-alumina group 2 and group 4 glass, and the later of the two groups of lead-potash glass. The glass beads from the three shipwrecks were identified by comparing their LA-ICP-MS and statistical analysis results to known datasets of soda-alumina and lead-potash glass sub-types (Craig & Dussubieux in press).

Three maps illustrate the distribution of Indian Ocean world glass identified from the shipwrecks, during the periods AD 1460–1487, AD 1488–1505 and AD 1573–1620 (Figures 1, 2 & 3). The refined chronology and distribution of mid-fifteenth to mid-seventeenth century Indian Ocean world glass indicates three broad directions of exchange flow over the three periods. In the two earlier periods, spanning AD 1460 to 1505, drawn red and black soda-alumina (group 2) glass was made in an unknown location and exchanged initially eastwards from Chaul (Robertshaw et al. Reference Robertshaw2006, Reference Robertshaw2010; Dussubieux et al. Reference Dussubieux2008; Wood Reference Wood2011, Reference Wood2016, Reference Wood and Ludden2019; Carter et al. Reference Carter, Dussubieux and Beavan2016; Grave et al. Reference Grave2019; Shewan et al. Reference Shewan2020; Dussubieux & Wood Reference Dussubieux, Wood, Kanungo and Dussubieux2021; Craig & Dussubieux in press). During the second period (AD 1488–1505), lead-potash glass re-entered the Indian Ocean world market from the east—likely from China—in the form of wound blue beads (Tamura Reference Tamura2015; Carter et al. Reference Carter, Dussubieux and Beavan2016; Carter et al. Reference Carter, Dussubieux, Polkinghorne and Pottier2019; Craig & Dussubieux in press). At the same time, a yellow variant of the soda-alumina (group 4) glass was shipped eastward from north-east India, possibly as raw glass to workshops in Southeast Asia, formed into different products and cross-exchanged westward (Gratuze Reference Gratuze2001; Huet Reference Huet and L'hour2001; Dussubieux Reference Dussubieux, Perret and Surachman2009; Carter Reference Carter2016; Carter et al. Reference Carter, Dussubieux and Beavan2016; Craig & Dussubieux in press). This yellow variant of soda-alumina (group 4) glass also raises a complicating factor. Specifically, glass beads discovered in an open burial in the Cardamom Mountains (in which human remains were dated to cal AD 1430–1465 (432±26 BP; GU31833; Beavan et al. Reference Beavan, Hamilton, Sokha and Sayle2015) match those from the later Santa Cruz wreck, but the beads may have been placed later (due to the open nature of the grave). This would explain the presence of later beads in an earlier burial. By the third period (AD 1573–1620), lead-potash glass had expanded into multiple monochrome colours in the eastern Indian Ocean world and had eclipsed drawn soda-alumina glass entirely (Carter et al. Reference Carter, Dussubieux and Beavan2016; Wood Reference Wood2016, Reference Wood and Ludden2019; Carter et al. Reference Carter, Dussubieux, Polkinghorne and Pottier2019; Craig & Dussubieux in press).

Figure 1. Map showing the distribution of Indian Ocean world glass identified from the Pandanan shipwreck during the period AD 1460–1487: hMg = drawn high-magnesium black; mNaAl2_b = drawn soda-alumina group 2 black; mNaAl2_rs = drawn soda-alumina group 2 red standard (length 1–4mm); mNaAl2_rl = drawn soda-alumina group 2 red long (length 4.5–15mm). Descriptors ‘standard’ and ‘long’ are based on measurements defined by a bead ratio formula (Wood Reference Wood2011: 70 & tabs 1–2) (map and photographs by the author).

Figure 2. Map showing distribution of Indian Ocean world glass identified from the Santa Cruz shipwreck during the period AD 1488–1505: mNaAl2_b = drawn soda-alumina group 2 black; mNaAl4_y = soda-alumina group 4 yellow; PbK_blue = wound lead-potash blue (map and photographs by the author).

Figure 3. Map showing distribution of Indian Ocean world glass identified from the Royal Captain Shoal wreck 2 during the period AD 1573–1620: PbK_tpurple = wound lead-potash transparent purple; PbK_orange = wound lead-potash orange; Pbk_red = wound lead-potash red; PbK_white = wound lead-potash white; PbK_yellow = wound lead-potash yellow (map and photographs by the author).

When refined to shorter periods of exchange, morphological and compositional analyses have increased our understanding of the chronology and distribution of mid-fifteenth to mid-seventeenth century glass.

Acknowledgements

The author thanks the National Museum of the Philippines, Jeremy Barns, Angel Baptiste, Mary Jane Bolunia, Sheldon Clyde Jago-on, Bobby Orillaneda, Nida Curvas and Eusebio Dizon. Thanks also to Laure Dussubieux in the Elemental Analysis Laboratory of the Chicago Field Museum, Brandon Taylor in the McGill Geographic Information Centre and the anonymous peer reviewers.

Funding statement

Fieldwork was supported by the Society for Nautical Research, Brasenose College and Oxford University Meyerstein. Laboratory analysis was supported by the National Science Foundation and a Bruce and Barbara Trigger Award awarded by the Anthropology Department at McGill University. Statistical interpretation was supported by a MITACS Research Training Award. Writing and mapping was supported by the Social Science and Research Council of Canada MCRI and a McGill University Award of Excellence.

References

Beavan, N., Hamilton, D., Sokha, T. & Sayle, K.. 2015. Radiocarbon dates from the highland jar and coffin burial site of Phnom Khnang Peung, Cardamom Mountains, Cambodia. Radiocarbon 57: 15–31. https://doi.org/10.2458/azu_rc.57.18194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, A.K. 2016. The production and exchange of glass and stone beads in Southeast Asia from 500 BCE to the early second millennium CE: an assessment of the work of Peter Francis in light of recent research. Archaeological Research in Asia 6: 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ara.2016.02.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, J. & Dussubieux, L.. In press. Shifting patterns of glass bead cargo of 15th–17th century Philippines shipwrecks, in Walder, H. & Dussubieux, L. (ed.) Glass bead technology, chronology, and exchange: LA-ICP-MS glass compositions from the Field Museum's elemental analysis facility. Leuven: Catholic University of Leuven.Google Scholar
Carter, A.K., Dussubieux, L. & Beavan, N.. 2016. Glass beads from 15th–17th century CE jar burial sites in Cambodia's Cardamom Mountains. Archaeometry 58: 401–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, A.K., Dussubieux, L., Polkinghorne, M. & Pottier, C.. 2019. Glass artifacts at Angkor: evidence for exchange. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 11: 1013–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-017-0586-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dussubieux, L. 2009. Compositional analysis of ancient glass fragments from North Sumatra, in Perret, D. & Surachman, H. (ed.) Histoire de Barus III: regards sur une place marchande de l'océan indien (XIIe-milieu du XVIIe s.) (Cahier d'Archipel 38): 385–417. Paris: École Française d'Extrême-Orient.Google Scholar
Dussubieux, L. & Gratuze, B.. 2013. Glass in south Asia, in Janssens, K. (ed.) Modern methods for analysing archaeological and historical glass: 399–413. Chichester: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118314234.ch19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dussubieux, L. & Wood, M.. 2021. Indian glass: chronology and distribution in Eastern Africa, in Kanungo, A.K. & Dussubieux, L. (ed.) Ancient glass of south Asia: archaeology, ethnography and global connection: 511–32. Singapore: Springer Nature & Gandhinagar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dussubieux, L., Gratuze, B. & Blet-Lemarquand, M.. 2010. Mineral soda-alumina glass: occurrence and meaning. Journal of Archaeological Science 37: 1646–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2010.01.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dussubieux, L. et al. 2008. The trading of ancient glass beads: new analytical data from south Asian and East African soda alumina glass beads. Archaeometry 50: 797–821. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.2007.00350.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gratuze, B. 2001. Study of glass objects from the wrecked junk of Brunei. IRAMAT, Institut de Recherche sur les Archeominerieux, Centre Ernect Babelon, Orleans: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (unpublished report).Google Scholar
Grave, P. et al. 2019. The Southeast Asian water frontier: coastal trade and mid-fifteenth c. CE “hill tribe” burials, south-eastern Cambodia. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 11: 5023–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-019-00842-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huet, N. 2001. Element de parure, bracelets, et perles, in L'hour, M. (ed.) La Memorie engloutir de Brunei (Borneo Research Bulletin 2010, Annual 41): 129–67. Paris: Editions Textuel.Google Scholar
Robertshaw, P. et al. 2006. Chemical analysis of glass beads from Madagascar. Journal of African Archaeology 4: 91–109. https://doi.org/10.3213/1612-1651-10064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertshaw, P. et al. 2010. Southern African glass beads: chemistry, glass sources and patterns of trade. Journal of Archaeological Science 37: 1898–912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2010.02.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shewan, L. et al. 2020. Isotopic insights into the jar-and-coffin mortuary ritual of the Cardamom Mountains, Cambodia. Antiquity 94: 1575–91. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2020.201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamura, T. 2015. Scientific study and conservation treatment of artifacts excavated from Krang Kor. Nara: Nara National Research Institute for Cultural Properties.Google Scholar
Wood, M. 2011. A glass bead sequence for southern Africa from the 8th to the 16th century AD. Journal of African Archaeology 9: 67–84. https://doi.org/10.3213/1612-1651-10184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, M. 2016. Glass beads from pre-European contact sub-Saharan Africa: Peter Francis's work revisited and updated. Archaeological Research in Asia 6: 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ara.2016.02.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, M. 2019. Glass beads and trade in the western Indian Ocean, in Ludden, D. (ed.) Oxford research encyclopedia of Asian history: 1–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277727.013.334Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Map showing the distribution of Indian Ocean world glass identified from the Pandanan shipwreck during the period AD 1460–1487: hMg = drawn high-magnesium black; mNaAl2_b = drawn soda-alumina group 2 black; mNaAl2_rs = drawn soda-alumina group 2 red standard (length 1–4mm); mNaAl2_rl = drawn soda-alumina group 2 red long (length 4.5–15mm). Descriptors ‘standard’ and ‘long’ are based on measurements defined by a bead ratio formula (Wood 2011: 70 & tabs 1–2) (map and photographs by the author).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Map showing distribution of Indian Ocean world glass identified from the Santa Cruz shipwreck during the period AD 1488–1505: mNaAl2_b = drawn soda-alumina group 2 black; mNaAl4_y = soda-alumina group 4 yellow; PbK_blue = wound lead-potash blue (map and photographs by the author).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Map showing distribution of Indian Ocean world glass identified from the Royal Captain Shoal wreck 2 during the period AD 1573–1620: PbK_tpurple = wound lead-potash transparent purple; PbK_orange = wound lead-potash orange; Pbk_red = wound lead-potash red; PbK_white = wound lead-potash white; PbK_yellow = wound lead-potash yellow (map and photographs by the author).