Previous research has shown positive associations between healthful home food environments (e.g. frequency of family meals, home food availability) and child and adolescent diet quality( Reference Campbell, Crawford and Ball 1 , Reference Campbell and Crawford 2 ). For example, prior studies have shown that more frequent family meals (e.g. more than three family meals per week)( Reference Horning, Fulkerson and Friend 3 ) are associated with increased intake of fruits and vegetables( Reference Neumark-Sztainer, Hannan and Story 4 – Reference Neumark-Sztainer, Larson and Fulkerson 8 ) and decreased intake of soda( Reference Gillman, Rifas-Shiman and Frazier a 5 , Reference Neumark-Sztainer, Larson and Fulkerson 8 , Reference Woodruff and Hanning 9 ) and fast foods( Reference Cutler, Flood and Hannan 10 ). Fast food for family meals has been associated with higher intake of snack foods and fast foods in adolescents( Reference Boutelle, Fulkerson and Neumark-Sztainer 11 ). Furthermore, many studies have shown positive relationships between availability and accessibility of fruits and vegetables in the home and child and adolescent intake of those same foods( Reference Wyse, Campbell and Nathan 12 – Reference Blanchette and Brug 14 ).
Given the importance of having a healthful home food environment for child health, it is useful to examine whether home food environments differ by race/ethnicity, especially because race/ethnicity is often accompanied by cultural differences that are important to understand for health promotion. US Census data show a population growing in racial/ethnic diversity; more than half of children living in the USA will be from a minority race/ethnicity by 2020 and this number is only expected to grow( 15 ). Additionally, refugee/immigrant populations also continue to rise nationally( 16 ). St. Paul/Minneapolis, Minnesota, where the current study was implemented, has the largest Somali( Reference Darboe 17 ) and the second largest Hmong populations in the USA( Reference Pfeifer, Sullivan and Yang 18 ). The diversity and large immigrant population in St. Paul/Minneapolis provides an opportunity to determine if there are dietary intake differences between populations.
Project Eating and Activity in Teens (EAT), a population-based study of adolescents in Minnesota, USA, examined the home food environment across race/ethnicity and showed meaningful differences( Reference Neumark-Sztainer, Hannan and Story 4 , Reference Neumark-Sztainer, Larson and Fulkerson 8 , Reference Larson, Eisenberg and Berge 19 ). Specifically, one study found that most factors in the home food environment (e.g. healthful/unhealthful food availability, meal planning), with the exception of family meal frequency, varied across racial/ethnic groups (i.e. White, Black, Asian, East African (e.g. Somali), Latino and Native American)( Reference Larson, Eisenberg and Berge 19 ). Another Project EAT study found that Asian Americans (the majority of whom were Hmong) had the highest frequency of family meals( Reference Neumark-Sztainer, Hannan and Story 4 ); while a third analysis found that Hmong adolescents reported more involvement with family meal preparation than White adolescents( Reference Stang, Kong and Story 20 ).
Dietary intake patterns also differ by race/ethnicity. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data found many dietary intake differences among White, Black and Latino (i.e. Mexican American) children/adolescents. For example, compared with Whites and Blacks, Latinos had the highest intakes of fruits, vegetables, dry beans/peas and total grains, and they were more likely to meet the minimum recommendations for these foods( Reference Kirkpatrick, Dodd and Reedy 21 ). An analysis of Project EAT data, including Latino, Somali, Hmong and White adolescents, found many differences in dietary intake across groups. Compared with White adolescents, Latino and Somali adolescents had higher intakes of fruits and fast foods; and Hmong adolescents had lower intakes of sugar-sweetened beverages( Reference Arcan, Larson and Bauer 22 ). A study of Asian, Latino and White adolescents found that, compared with White adolescents, Asians had higher intake of vegetables and lower intake of soda; and Latino adolescents had lower intakes of vegetables and milk( Reference Allen, Elliott and Morales 23 ).
While previous research does show some evidence that the home food environment and dietary intake vary by race/ethnicity( Reference Neumark-Sztainer, Hannan and Story 4 , Reference Neumark-Sztainer, Larson and Fulkerson 8 , Reference Larson, Eisenberg and Berge 19 – Reference Allen, Elliott and Morales 23 ), the amount of research is limited and the majority of analyses are from Project EAT data. More studies are needed to characterize the home food environment of different racial/ethnic groups, particularly those of young children. More research also needs to be done on other racial/ethnic groups found in St. Paul/Minneapolis, Minnesota such as urban Native Americans( Reference Gray and Smith 24 ). The current study describes the home food environment and dietary intake of young children (5–7 years old) from racially/ethnically diverse households (i.e. Black, White, Hmong, Latino, Native American and Somali), which includes a large immigrant sample. The study improves upon previous research by using objectively collected home food environment data (i.e. a researcher-collected home food inventory), as well as using 24 h dietary recalls to assess child dietary intake, which is the gold standard in dietary assessment( Reference Johnson, Driscoli and Goran 25 ). An understanding of how these patterns differ by racial/ethnic group will allow for insight into how to intervene with these different groups to increase the healthfulness of children’s home food environments and dietary intake with the goal of improving child health.
Methods
Data for the present study were taken from phase I of the Family Matters study, a mixed-methods, incremental 5-year study exploring risk and protective factors for childhood obesity in low-income and minority households( Reference Berge, Trofholz and Tate 26 ). Phase I took place between 2015 and 2016. Primary care clinics in Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota identified 5–7-year-old children who had recently had a well-child visit; these families were then sent a letter inviting them to participate in the Family Matters study. Families were eligible to participate if they had a 5–7-year-old child, at least one additional child living in the home full-time (i.e. sibling) and the primary parent shared at least one meal per day with the 5–7-year-old child. Study eligibility required that parents needed to speak and read English, Somali, Hmong and/or Spanish. Families (n 150) were stratified by race/ethnicity so there was an equal distribution (twenty-five families per group) of the following categories: Black, White, Hmong, Latino, Native American and Somali. Families were eligible to participate only if the parent self-identified as one of the six race/ethnicity categories. To ensure there was an equal distribution of weight status, each racial/ethnic group was stratified so there were equal numbers of non-overweight (51 %) and overweight/obese (49 %) 5–7-year-old children (≥5th and <85th BMI percentile = non-overweight; ≥85th BMI percentile = overweight/obese)( 27 ). Additional demographic data can be found in Table 1. Detailed descriptions of phase I of the study have been published elsewhere( Reference Berge, Trofholz and Tate 26 ). Families participated in two home visits over a two-week period. The current analysis uses data from the following measurements collected at the home visits: anthropometric measurements, a home food inventory (HFI), a parent-completed online survey and 24 h dietary recalls. The University of Minnesota’s Institutional Review Board approved all study protocols.
Table 1 Demographic characteristics of participants: families with 5–7-year-old children, Family Matters study, Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN, USA, 2015–2016
SNAP, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program; WIC, Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children; TANF, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families; SSI, Supplemental Security Income; MFIP, Minnesota Family Investment Program.
Measures
All variables used in the analysis are described in detail in Table 2. The procedures used to collect the study measures are described below.
Table 2 Description of measures used in the Family Matters study to describe the home food environment and dietary intake of racially/ethnically diverse children
HEI-2010, Healthy Eating Index-2010; SSB, sugar-sweetened beverages; HFI, home food inventory; SNAP, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program; WIC, Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children; TANF, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families; SSI, Supplemental Security Income; MFIP, Minnesota Family Investment Program; NDSR, Nutrition Data System for Research; TV, television; CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
* University of Minnesota, Nutrition Data System for Research (2014) Guide to creating variables needed to calculate scores for each component of the Healthy Eating Index-2010 (HEI-2010). https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4snm2Q3-ffQQTVHUWE1NGNxUnc/view (accessed June 2017).
† Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2010) Growth charts. http://www.cdc.gov/growthcharts/ (accessed June 2017).
Anthropometry
Trained researchers collected the height and weight of all family members at the first home visit. Height was assessed to the nearest 0·1 cm and weight to the nearest 0·1 kg. Both measures were taken twice, and agreement of less than 0·5 cm/0·5 kg was required. BMI percentile values for the 5–7-year-old child were calculated using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention calculator( 27 ).
Home food inventory
An inventory with demonstrated validity( Reference Fulkerson, Nelson and Lytle 28 ) was adapted to produce a single instrument that captured common foods relevant to households of the racial/ethnic groups included in the study. The validated HFI was adapted in the following ways: (i) foods were added to the HFI that were frequently found in participants’ homes in a previous study conducted by the research team, particularly ones that contributed to a less healthy environment (e.g. energy drinks, puddings, canned pasta (e.g. ravioli))( Reference Trofholz, Tate and Draxten 29 ); (ii) two other validated HFIs – one for Spanish-speaking and one for Somali-speaking families – were reviewed and culturally specific foods were added( Reference Hearst, Fulkerson and Parke 30 ); and (iii) the Family Matters team, which included representation across all racial/ethnic groups, reviewed the HFI and offered ideas for missing foods.
A trained researcher completed the HFI during the first home visit. The parent indicated the areas of the home where food was stored (e.g. refrigerator, pantry, cupboards); the researcher then examined these areas and selected ‘yes’ on the HFI checklist if the food was present. Foods were marked as present regardless of whether the package was open/unopen; foods also did not need a certain quantity to be considered available. For example, if apples were present at a household with two apples and a household with thirty apples, each household received a ‘yes’ for having apples. Fruit and vegetable categories also asked if the fruit/vegetable was fresh, canned, frozen and/or dried (fruit only). In addition to the food availability assessment, the HFI also measures the accessibility of certain foods (fruits/vegetables, sugar-sweetened beverages) in the kitchen and refrigerator. Items were considered accessible in the kitchen if they were visible and easy to reach. Accessible items in the refrigerator were ones that were visible without moving items around.
Online survey
The primary parent took an extensive online survey created by the Family Matters team at the second home visit on a study-provided iPad. Parents also had the option of completing the online survey in advance; in this case, the parent was emailed the survey the day before the second home visit. The present study uses survey questions regarding the family meal environment, including frequency of family meals, fast food at family meals and the child’s participation in preparing meals. Survey questions were translated by team members into Hmong, Spanish and Somali; each translated survey was reviewed by two additional staff members fluent in the respective language to ensure the question’s meaning was correctly transmitted. Details about the creation of the full online survey have been published elsewhere( Reference Berge, Trofholz and Tate 26 ).
24 h Dietary recall interviews
Three 24 h dietary recall interviews were conducted regarding the dietary intake of the 5–7-year-old children using Nutrition Data System for Research (NDSR) software, version 2015( 31 ). Recalls were conducted with the parent of the 5–7-year-old child on three non-consecutive days (two weekdays and one weekend day). The first and third recalls were conducted during home visits; the second recall was collected via telephone in between the two home visits. As dietary recalls were conducted at and around home visits, all three recalls were scheduled. Recalls were conducted in the participant’s preferred language (i.e. English, Hmong, Spanish, Somali). To assist with accuracy, participants were given a food amounts booklet to use as a reporting aid, and parents were provided with a food diary to record the foods and drinks their child consumed the day prior to the recall. Whenever possible, school breakfast and lunch menus were used as a guide, and standard amounts were used for common school items (e.g. 4 fluid ounces of juice). Family Matters staff identified common traditional Somali and Hmong foods (e.g. anjero) in advance and acceptable substitutes were developed if the food was not found in the NDSR system. Staff dietitians performed detailed quality assurance reviews on 100 % of recalls; this included (i) visually reviewing the recall (e.g. identifying gaps in meal occasions, unusual entries, resolving foods eaten but not found in the NDSR system) and (ii) using NDSR reports to review food or nutrient amounts (e.g. sodium, energy) that were flagged as either too high or too low. A Healthy Eating Index-2010 (HEI-2010) score was calculated for each participant using data from the 24 h dietary recalls( Reference Guenther, Casavale and Reedy 32 ). The HEI-2010 scores were done using calculations provided by the Nutrition Coordinating Center at the University of Minnesota( 33 ).
Statistical analysis
A series of descriptive analyses and tabulations was performed to examine sample characteristics important for modelling assumptions (i.e. patterns of missingness and cell size). Multiple linear regression was used to evaluate how racial/ethnic groups differ in features of the family meal environment, child diet quality, and home food availability and accessibility. Race/ethnicity was modelled as a categorical independent variable and all study outcomes were analysed as continuous random variables. Predicted mean values by race/ethnicity (and the sample population in total, for sub-sample comparison) were examined after adjustment for covariates including parent work status, household income, child weight status, number of people living in the household and household structure (e.g. single parent). Pairwise analyses at the race/ethnicity group level were performed to examine if groups differed on the outcomes described above. To account for multiplicity, testing was conservatively adjusted to the 99 % confidence level to minimize an inflated type I error rate. All data management and analysis were performed using the statistical software package Stata SE version 15.
Results
The mean age of the children in the study was 6·4 (sd 0·8) years; children were split almost evenly by child sex (47 % female). The sample was primarily low-income (70 % of households earned less than $US 35 000 per annum), with about half working full-time (42 %), 21 % working part-time and 36 % not working. Over 40 % of the sample were immigrants to the USA. Additional demographic information can be found in Table 1.
Family meal environment
As shown in Table 3, racial/ethnic groups had similar family meal patterns. All racial/ethnic groups reported high numbers of family meals, with family dinners being the highest (all groups had more than five family dinners per week). Hmong families had the highest reported frequency of purchasing fast food for family meals (2·7 times/week); all racial/ethnic groups reported serving fast food for a family meal at least once weekly. Overall, the sample reported that the 5–7-year-old children helped prepare the dinner meal 2·0 times/week.
Table 3 Description of family meals variables (adjustedFootnote * mean values and 95 % confidence intervals) across racial/ethnic groups for participants of the Family Matters study, Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN, USA, 2015–2016
a,b Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (significance level was adjusted to 99 % confidence level to account for multiple testing).
* Adjusted for parent work status, household income, child weight status, number of people in household and household structure (e.g. single parent).
† One participant did not complete the Family Matters online survey, resulting in only 149 responses.
‡ Bold values indicate significance (P<0·05).
Child dietary intake
As shown in Table 4, there were significant differences in HEI-2010 scores across racial/ethnic groups, with Somali children having the highest HEI-2010 scores; their HEI-2010 scores were 15·3 points higherthan those of Black children, who had the lowest HEI-2010 scores. There was at least a one serving difference between the highest and lowest intake per racial/ethnic group for fruits, vegetables, whole grains and refined grains. In addition, there was over a 1400 mg difference in sodium intake between the highest and lowest intake per racial/ethnic group and over a 2093 kJ (500 kcal) difference in daily energy intake.
Table 4 Description of child dietary intake variables (adjustedFootnote * daily mean values and 95 % confidence intervals) across racial/ethnic groups for participants of the Family Matters study, Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN, USA, 2015–2016
HEI-2010, Healthy Eating Index-2010; SSB, sugar-sweetened beverages.
a,b,c Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (significance level was adjusted to 99 % confidence level to account for multiple testing).
* Adjusted for parent work status, household income, child weight status, number of people in household and household structure (e.g. single parent).
† Bold values indicate significance (P<0·05).
While Somali children had the highest HEI-2010 scores, they had low fruit and vegetable intakes (1·0 and 0·6 average daily servings, respectively). Somali children had low sodium, chips/crackers and daily energy intakes. Latino children, who were similar to Somali children in HEI-2010 scores, also had low intakes of sodium and chips/crackers, but their vegetable intake was significantly higher than Somali children. Black children, who had the lowest HEI-2010 scores, had lower fruit, vegetable and whole grain intakes, and higher intakes of refined grains, chips/crackers, sodium and daily energy.
Home food availability/accessibility
As shown in Table 5, there were significant differences across racial/ethnic groups for most categories of home food availability/accessibility. Regarding fruits and vegetables, Black and Hmong households had the lowest number of food types available; Black households also had less accessibility of fruits and vegetables. White and Latino households had the highest number of types of fruits and vegetables available, and the most accessible fruits and vegetables.
Table 5 Description of home food availability and accessibility variables (adjustedFootnote * mean values and 95 % confidence intervals) across racial/ethnic groups for participants of the Family Matters study, Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN, USA, 2015–2016
SSB, sugar-sweetened beverages.
a,b,c Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (significance level was adjusted to 99 % confidence level to account for multiple testing).
* Adjusted for parent work status, household income, child weight status, number of people in household and household structure (e.g. single parent).
† Bold values indicate significance (P<0·05).
While White households had high numbers of fruits and vegetables available and accessible, they also had higher numbers of sugar-sweetened beverages, quick-cook foods, candy and chips/crackers than most racial/ethnic groups. Native American families had the highest number of types of quick-cook foods (e.g. burritos, hot dogs), with an average of six types; this is 4·4 more types of quick-cook foods than Somali households, who had the lowest number.
Discussion
The present study described the home food environment and characterized child dietary intake in a racially/ethnically diverse sample. Results showed significant differences across many areas of the home food environment and dietary intake that may be important to consider when working with these racial/ethnic groups.
Family meal environment
Regarding the family meal environment, family meal frequency was high across all racial/ethnic groups, particularly for family dinners( Reference Larson, Eisenberg and Berge 19 ). These are encouraging findings as previous research has shown family meals to be associated with better dietary outcomes in children and adolescents( Reference Neumark-Sztainer, Hannan and Story 4 – Reference Cutler, Flood and Hannan 10 ). It appears that intervention efforts aimed at increasing family meal frequency may not need to be tailored by race/ethnicity. Instead, the focus of intervention work may need to be on family meal dietary quality and the context of the family meal( Reference Fulkerson, Friend and Horning 34 , Reference Horning, Schow and Friend 35 ). Participants reported purchasing fast food for family meals 1·8 times per week, with Hmong families reporting the highest amount at 2·7 times/week. Working with families to decrease fast food at family meals may be one way to encourage better family meal dietary quality( Reference Boutelle, Fulkerson and Neumark-Sztainer 11 ). Additionally, families reported that their 5–7-year-old child helped prepare a dinner meal 2·0 times per week, and there were no significant differences across race/ethnicity. There is limited research about how frequently children – particularly young children – assist in meal preparation and the present study provides new information across racial/ethnic groups( Reference van der Horst, Ferrage and Rytz 36 ). Including young children in making family meals may be a potential target in future family meal interventions as it can increase cooking skills, confidence, attitudes and diet quality( Reference Lavelle, Spence and Hollywood 37 ).
Child dietary intake
There were large and significant differences in HEI-2010 scores across racial/ethnic groups, with Somali children having the highest scores (64·2) and Black children having the lowest (48·9). The present study also confirms prior research showing that children are below recommendations for dietary intake of fruits and vegetables( Reference Krebs-Smith, Guenther and Subar 38 , Reference Guenther, Dodd and Reedy 39 ). While Somali children had the highest HEI-2010 scores, they did not have a clear pattern of healthful dietary intake across food categories. For example, they had the lowest reported dietary intakes of both fruits and vegetables, which differs from previous research on Somali adolescents( Reference Arcan, Larson and Bauer 22 ). It is not clear if this is a disparate finding, or if Somali adolescents happen to have higher fruit and vegetable intakes than Somali children. Somali children’s high HEI-2010 scores may be partly attributed to their significantly lower daily energy intake. Because individual HEI-2010 categories (e.g. Total Fruit, Dairy) are calculated by looking at cup/ounce equivalents per 4184 kJ (1000 kcal), a lower intake of fruit would still contribute to a larger part of the daily energy intake( Reference Guenther, Casavale and Reedy 32 ). All Somali parents in the present study were immigrants; of the immigrant groups, they have been in the USA the shortest time (mean 10·9 years). It may be that Somali parents are maintaining a high diet quality brought with them from their home countries. Some previous research has shown that diet quality is negatively impacted upon people’s immigration to the USA( Reference Pan, Dixon and Himburg 40 – Reference Ayala, Baquero and Klinger 44 ); therefore, researchers may wish to intervene with Somali families to help ensure their healthier diet is not diminished the longer they are in the USA. Somali families may also be able to teach other immigrant families about balancing life as an immigrant in the USA with maintaining a healthy diet.
Conversely, Black children had the lowest HEI-2010 scores; across food categories, there was a consistent pattern where Black children had lower intake of healthful categories (e.g. fruits, vegetables, whole grains) and higher intake of unhealthful categories (e.g. refined grains, chips/crackers, sodium, daily energy). When calculating HEI-2010 scores, Somali children received an average of 6·0 more HEI points than Black children for consuming lower amounts of ‘empty calories’ (i.e. energy from solid fats and added sugars)( 45 ). Study results provide multiple avenues for improving the dietary quality of Black children (e.g. increased fruit and vegetable intakes, lower sodium and empty calories intakes, lower daily energy intake). As Blacks are one of the largest minority groups in the USA( 46 ), future interventions working to increase dietary quality for Black children could have significant public health advantages.
Home food availability and accessibility
As with dietary intake, there were many significant differences across racial/ethnic groups for home food availability and accessibility. White and Latino households were similar in that they had the most types of fruits and vegetables and highest fruit and vegetable accessibility scores, yet White and Latino households also had many types of unhealthful foods (e.g. sugar-sweetened beverages, candy, baked goods, chips/crackers). As shown earlier, compared with other racial/ethnic groups, White and Latino children had among the highest HEI-2010 scores. These findings suggest that it is not necessary to have only healthful foods in the home to have healthful child dietary intake. Future research should investigate how White and Latino children maintain high HEI-2010 scores despite having high levels of snacks in the home, and if there are recommendations that can be developed that help families balance the amount of healthful and unhealthful foods in the home.
One interesting and significant finding was regarding the amount of quick-cook foods (e.g. burritos, chicken nuggets) available in households of this diverse population. Native American, Black and White families had the highest number of types of quick-foods, while Hmong, Latino and Somali families had the lowest. As the majority of Hmong, Latino and Somali parents in the Family Matters study were immigrants( Reference Berge, Trofholz and Tate 26 ), it may be that these groups maintain their traditional foods, which would include less quick-cook foods. Future research may want to qualitatively investigate Hmong, Latino and Somali homes to identify any helpful strategies for preparing quick family meals that do not rely on quick-cook foods to extend family meal interventions to diverse populations( Reference Fulkerson, Friend and Horning 34 ). Finally, there appear to be significant differences across race/ethnicity regarding the types (e.g. fresh, canned) of fruits and vegetables available in the home. Future research may wish to investigate further how the types of fruits and vegetables in the home are associated with dietary intake in different racial/ethnic groups.
There were many strengths to the present study, one of which includes the racially/ethnically diverse sample. Little is known about the dietary intake of some groups (e.g. urban Native Americans)( Reference Gray and Smith 24 ) and less is known about the home food environment of racial/ethnic groups such as Somali and Hmong households, which the study assessed. Additionally, the mixed-methods and pre-stratified study design allowed for an equal distribution of households by race/ethnicity to examine important questions about the home food environment of diverse families. Study materials (i.e. online survey) were translated into Hmong, Somali and Spanish, which allowed the participation of non-English-speaking participants. The present study also used dietary intake and home food availability data that are objectively measured. However, there were also limitations to the study. First, while the sample size is very diverse, the racial/ethnic sub-sample size is small due to the limiting nature of conducting mixed-methods studies and using in-home data collection methods; to account for this issue, more conservative statistical testing was implemented to deal with multiple comparisons. Therefore, more research is needed with larger samples. Second, home food availability assesses only the number of types of foods; for example, having limited types of fruit in the home does not necessarily mean there is limited quantity of fruits. Some racial/ethnic groups may consume larger quantities of a few types of fruits, which would not be captured by the HFI tool used. Additionally, parents were not provided a definition of meal preparation, which could lead to different survey responses regarding children’s participation in meal preparation if parents’ ideas about what constitutes meal preparation varied. Lastly, revisions to the HFI for the Family Matters study to increase face validity may have altered the psychometric properties of the originally validated instrument.
Conclusions
The present study examined the home food environments (i.e. family meals, dietary intake and home food availability) of children from six racial/ethnic and immigrant/refugee groups. It provides new information regarding the home food environment of young children in previously understudied racial/ethnic groups. Results show significant differences across racial/ethnic groups for many home food environment variables; results also identify aspects of racial/ethnic groups that should be explored further to develop strategies and recommendations for improving other groups’ home food environments and child dietary intake. Finally, the study shows that interventions working to improve the home food environment and dietary intake of children need to consider race/ethnicity as well as other factors related to race/ethnicity, such as cultural norms, cultural assets and immigrant status.
Acknowledgements
Acknowledgements: The Family Matters study was a team effort and could not have been accomplished without the dedicated staff who drove throughout the Twin Cities to connect with participants in their homes. For their hard work, the authors would like to thank: Awo Ahmed, Nimo Ahmed, Rodolfo Batres, Carlos Chavez, Mia Donley, Michelle Draxten, Sulekha Ibrahim, Walter Novillo, Alejandra Ochoa, Luis ‘Marty’ Ortega, Anna Schulte, Hiba Sharif, Mai See Thao, Rebecca Tran, Bai Vue and Serena Xiong. Financial support: This research was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (Principal Investigator: J.M.B., grant number R01HL126171). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development or the National Institutes of Health. Conflict of interest: None. Authorship: A.Tr. participated in the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data and drafted the manuscript. A.Ta. participated in the analysis and interpretation of data, contributed to the design of the study and critically reviewed the submitted draft. J.A.F., M.O.H. and D.N.-S. contributed to the design of the study, interpretation of data and critically reviewed the submitted draft. J.M.B. oversaw the Family Matters study, contributed to the design of this study, provided interpretation of data and critically reviewed the submitted draft. Ethics of human subject participation: This study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki and all procedures involving human subjects were approved by the University of Minnesota’s Institutional Review Board. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.
