Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:20:12.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biomarkers of PUFA and cardiovascular risk factors and events in healthy Asian populations: a systematic review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2024

Yu Qi Lee*
Affiliation:
Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Kok Hsien Tan
Affiliation:
Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Mary F.-F. Chong
Affiliation:
Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore Institute for Human Development and Potential, Agency for Science, Technology, and Research, Singapore
*
Corresponding author: Dr Yu Qi Lee; Email: ephlyq@nus.edu.sg
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The associations between circulating PUFA and cardiovascular risk factors and events in healthy Asian populations have been less examined robustly compared with Western populations. This systematic review aimed to summarise current evidence on the associations between n-3 and n-6 PUFA biomarkers and cardiovascular risk factors and events in healthy Asian populations. Four databases were searched for observational studies from 2010 until 2024. Twenty-three studies were eligible, which covered six Asian countries and included events (n 7), traditional risk factors such as blood pressure and lipids (n 4), physical signs such as arterial stiffness (n 4), non-traditional lipid markers (n 1), markers of inflammation (n 4), markers of thrombosis (n 2) and non-invasive imaging-based markers (n 5). Biological sample types included plasma (n 6), serum (n 14) and erythrocyte (n 3). Higher circulating total n-3 PUFA appeared to be associated with lower hypertension risk and specifically EPA and DHA to be associated with lower myocardial infarction risk, reduction in TAG and inflammation. Higher circulating linoleic acid was associated with improved lipid profiles and lower inflammation. Limited evidence led to inconclusive associations between circulating n-6 PUFA biomarkers and CVD events and blood pressure. No consistent associations with arterial stiffness, obesity, thrombosis and imaging-based biomarkers were observed for circulating PUFA biomarkers in Asian populations. Limited studies exist for each outcome; hence, results should be interpreted with caution. More high-quality and prospective studies in Asian populations are warranted. Several recommendations such as sample size justification and reporting of non-respondents rate are proposed for future studies.

Type
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

CVD is the leading cause of deaths globally and in Asia in 2019(1). About one-third of CVD deaths, or 12 % of total deaths, were attributable to dietary risks, which formed the leading behavioural risk factor for CVD deaths(2). Among various dietary components, PUFA, especially n-3 and n-6, have gained substantial attention due to their potential health benefits.

Dietary intake or supplementation of n-3 PUFA has been shown to have favourable effects on lipid profiles(Reference AbuMweis, Jew and Tayyem3), inflammation(Reference AbuMweis, Jew and Tayyem3,Reference Li, Huang and Zheng4) , blood pressure(Reference AbuMweis, Jew and Tayyem3,Reference Miller, Van Elswyk and Alexander5,Reference Ueshima, Stamler and Elliott6) and thrombosis(Reference Gao, Cao and Mao7), all of which are well-established risk factors for CVD. Long-term prospective cohort studies consistently demonstrated an inverse association between fish and n-3 PUFA intake and the risk of developing CVD, especially CHD and myocardial infarction (MI) and cardiovascular mortality in the general population(Reference Zhang, Zhuang and He8,Reference Innes and Calder9) . However, a recent Cochrane review found that n-3 PUFA supplementation with capsules has little or no effect on combined cardiovascular events (including fatal and non-fatal MI, angina, stroke, heart failure and peripheral arterial disease) or cardiac death(Reference Abdelhamid, Brown and Brainard10). In line with the findings from observational studies, a meta-analysis of prospective studies in Western and Asian populations indicated that higher levels of n-3 PUFA biomarkers were associated with a significantly reduced risk of total CVD, CHD and total mortality(Reference Jiang, Wang and Wang11). In this meta-analysis, only four studies examining CVD-related outcomes were conducted in Asia(Reference Jiang, Wang and Wang11). Associations between n-3 PUFA biomarkers and cardiovascular risk factors and events specifically in healthy Asian populations have been less studied.

A recent meta-analysis found the associations between circulating or dietary n-3 PUFA and metabolic syndrome risk to be different between Asian and American/European populations(Reference Jang and Park12). Asian participants with a high n-3 PUFA level had a lower metabolic syndrome risk, while no such associations were observed in American/European participants(Reference Jang and Park12). Dietary patterns vary between Western and Asian populations(Reference Bennett, Bardon and Gibney13) and evidence from trans-ethnic studies showed genetic heterogeneities involving fatty acid metabolism(Reference Hu, Li and Lu14) and type 2 diabetes susceptibility(Reference Li, Gan and Lu15,Reference Luo, Ren and Liu16) between Caucasians and Asians. These factors may result in differences in the association between biomarkers of PUFA and cardiovascular risk factors and events. Thus, it is important to examine the associations between biomarkers of PUFA and cardiovascular risk factors and events in Western and Asian populations separately to account for the differential effects in various populations.

The role of n-6 PUFA in cardiovascular health remains controversial. A Cochrane review found that increasing intake of n-6 PUFA from food or supplements may reduce serum total cholesterol (TC) but not other blood fat fractions or adiposity(Reference Hooper, Al-Khudairy and Abdelhamid17). Also, n-6 PUFA intake was not associated with any CVD events and mortality(Reference Hooper, Al-Khudairy and Abdelhamid17,Reference Chowdhury, Warnakula and Kunutsor18) . However, a meta-analysis reported an association between a higher level of linoleic acid from adipose tissue and blood and a lower risk of CVD and CVD mortality(Reference Marklund, Wu and Imamura19). The conflicting results might be related to variations in the method of measurement of PUFA (dietary v. biomarker) and measurement errors of dietary assessments, as well as the bioavailability of these fatty acids(Reference Shim, Oh and Kim20). Like the above regarding n-3 PUFA biomarkers, associations between n-6 PUFA biomarkers and cardiovascular risk factors and events specifically in healthy Asian populations have been less studied.

Dietary assessment by 24-h dietary recalls, food records or FFQ could be subjected to reporting bias and measurement errors. Biomarkers of PUFA provide a more objective and reliable assessment of PUFA intake because they are free of reporting bias and other measurement errors intrinsic to questionnaire-based assessments. Therefore, biomarkers of n-3 or n-6 PUFA are valuable when evaluating the associations between the intake of these PUFA and disease risk(Reference Jackson, Polreis and Tintle21). Additionally, biomarker-based investigations allow direct quantification of individual fatty acids, which may have different effects on clinical outcomes or disease risk factors(Reference Mozaffarian and Wu22).

The associations between biomarkers of n-3 and n-6 PUFA and cardiovascular risk factors and events in healthy Asian populations have been less examined robustly compared with Western populations and remain uncertain. To our knowledge, there has been no systematic review summarising the existing evidence from observational studies specifically in Asian populations. Therefore, this study aimed to systematically review the associations between biomarkers of n-3 and n-6 PUFA and cardiovascular risk factors and events in healthy Asian populations, to discuss the heterogeneity between studies and to identify the existing gaps in the literature.

Methods

The protocol for this systematic review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) as CRD42022354471(Reference Lee, Tan and Chong23) and followed the guidelines outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement(Reference Moher, Liberati and Tetzlaff24).

Search strategy and selection criteria

Relevant studies published from January 2010 until August 2024 were searched using databases PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. We intend to include only recent evidence. The keywords used for the search were ‘omega-3 fatty acid’ OR ‘n-3’ OR ‘omega-6 fatty acid’ OR ‘n-6’ OR ‘polyunsaturated fatty acid’ or ‘PUFA’ OR ‘omega’ AND ‘Asia’. The Boolean operator ‘AND’ was used between groups and ‘OR’ within groups. The search strategy incorporated systematic reviews and meta-analyses to enable the exploration of reference lists within these reviews for any additional relevant articles.

Published original studies meeting the following criteria were included: (1) observational studies (cross-sectional, cohort, nested case–control and case–control) that examined n-3 and/or n-6 PUFA in circulating whole blood, serum, plasma, erythrocyte or adipose tissue; (2) studies that examined the relationship between PUFA biomarkers and any health outcomes or risk factors including (but not limited to) inflammation, non-communicable diseases, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, all types of CVD, all types of cancer, all-cause mortality or cause-specific mortality; (3) studies conducted in Asian (East Asian, Southeast Asian and South Asian) populations; and (4) any healthy populations, which was defined as individuals without any chronic diseases. No age restriction was given. The following studies were excluded: (1) studies where subjects were pregnant/nursing women, migrant populations or with existing chronic diseases; (2) studies that reported only dietary PUFA intake or PUFA supplementation; (3) animal studies; (4) studies that were case studies or randomised clinical trials, (5) non-original articles such as reviews, commentary or letters; and (6) non-English publications. The inclusion of studies was first assessed based on their title and abstract. For articles that met the inclusion criteria, the articles were then retrieved and reviewed, and relevant data were extracted. All stages in this process were carried out by two independent reviewers (YQ, KH or Jason). Any disagreements were resolved through discussion to reach mutual consensus and/or consultation with a third independent reviewer. This paper will only focus on CVD-related risk factors and events as the health outcome of interest. The other health outcomes will be reported separately.

Data extraction

Two authors (YQ and KH) independently extracted and adjudicated data on pre-specified data collection tables and cross-checked them for accuracy and consistency. Any discrepancies were resolved by consensus. The following data were extracted: publication details (publication year and country), study and participant characteristics (study type, aim, sample size, age and sex, duration of follow-up (for prospective studies), biological sample type and method of measurement, PUFA type and health outcome. Due to both heterogeneity in reporting and the limited number of studies reporting data for the same combinations of PUFA biomarkers (exposures) and cardiovascular risk factors and events (outcomes), a meta-analysis was deemed unsuitable, and studies were summarised narratively.

Quality assessment

Quality assessment of the included studies was performed by two researchers (YQ and KH) independently using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS)(Reference Wells, Wells and Shea25). The NOS assigns a maximum of nine stars for cohort and case–control studies, evaluating three domains: (1) selection of study groups (up to four stars), (2) comparability of groups (up to two stars) and (3) ascertainment of outcome (for cohort studies) or exposure (for case–control studies) (up to three stars). An adapted NOS was used for cross-sectional studies(Reference Herzog, Álvarez-Pasquin and Díaz26). The NOS assigns a maximum of ten stars, evaluating three domains: (1) selection of study groups (up to five stars), (2) comparability of groups (up to two stars) and (3) ascertainment of outcome (up to three stars). Any disagreements in the quality assessment were resolved through discussion to reach a mutual consensus and/or consultation with a third independent reviewer. No studies were excluded based on quality ratings.

Results

Search results

A total of 20 218 articles were identified in our initial search through the databases, of which 3245 were duplicates and 16 872 were excluded based on a review of titles and abstracts. An additional nine articles were identified by hand searching. Full text of the remaining articles was retrieved, leading to the exclusion of another sixty because they do not meet the PICOS criteria: population (n 21), intervention (n 12), comparator (n 0), outcome (n 11) and study type (n 16). Of the remaining fifty studies, twenty-three studies focused on CVD-related risk factors and events and were included in this present paper. A flow diagram of the search result is illustrated in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) flow diagram of the study selection process.

Study characteristics

Of the twenty-three studies that looked at CVD-related outcomes, study types included cross-sectional (n 16), prospective nested case–control and case–control (n 5) and prospective cohorts (n 2 Footnote 1 ) (one study consisted of both a cross-sectional and prospective cohort component)) with follow-up range of 3–9·6 years; countries included Japan (n 13), China (n 4), Singapore (n 3), Korea (n 2), India (n 1) and Taiwan (n 1); sample size ranged from 100 to 2206 for cross-sectional studies, 146–1488 for case–control studies and 1477–1833 for cohort studies; and age ranged from 39 to 85. PUFA examined included total n-3, EPA, DHA, DPA, α-linolenic acid (ALA), total n-6, arachidonic acid, linoleic acid and dihomo-γ-linolenic acid (DGLA). Biological sample types included plasma (n 6), serum(n 14) and erythrocyte(n 3).

The categorisation of outcomes related to CVD(Reference Stampfer, Ridker and Dzau27) found in this systematic review is shown in Table 1. CVD events included selected composite CVD events (non-fatal MI, fatal CHD, hospitalisation due to percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary bypass surgery and stroke)(Reference Chien, Lin and Hsu28), coronary artery disease(Reference Chei, Yamagishi and Kitamura29), total stroke(Reference Sun, Du and Zong30), ischaemic stroke(Reference Sun, Du and Zong30), intracerebral haemorrhage(Reference Sun, Du and Zong30), atrial fibrillation(Reference Tomita, Hata and Takeuchi31), MI(Reference Sun, Koh and Choi32Reference Hamazaki, Iso and Eshak34) and cardiac death(Reference Hamazaki, Iso and Eshak34). Traditional risk factors included blood pressure (systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure)(Reference Huang, Shou and Cai35Reference Bi, Yeo and Loo37), lipids panel (TC, TAG, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol)(Reference Bi, Yeo and Loo37,Reference Gupta, Lakshmy and Abraham38) , fasting blood glucose, fasting serum insulin and homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance(Reference Bi, Yeo and Loo37). Physical signs included aortic stiffness(Reference Sekikawa, Shin and Masaki39), arterial stiffness/wave reflection(Reference Tomiyama, Matsumoto and Odaira40), BMI(Reference Gupta, Lakshmy and Abraham38), fat mass and waist circumference(Reference Bi, Yeo and Loo37). Non-traditional lipid markers included VLDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and HDL-cholesterol subclasses(Reference Choo, Ueshima and Curb41). Inflammatory markers included C-reactive protein (CRP)(Reference Tomiyama, Matsumoto and Odaira40,Reference El-Saed, Masaki and Okamura42,Reference Kubota, Higashiyama and Imano43) and proinflammatory cytokines(Reference Sekikawa, Kadowaki and Curb44). Markers of haemostasis and thrombosis included plasma fibrinogen(Reference Hassen, Ueshima and Curb45) and plasma plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1)(Reference Lee, Curb and Kadowaki46). Non-invasive imaging-based markers included coronary artery calcification (CAC) score(Reference Sekikawa, Mahajan and Kadowaki47), CAC density score(Reference Sekikawa, Mahajan and Kadowaki47), aortic calcification score(Reference Mahajan, Choo and Masaki48) and carotid intima media thickness (IMT)(Reference Sekikawa, Kadowaki and El-Saed49,Reference Dai, Zhang and Wang50) . The main characteristics of these studies are summarised in Table 2.

Table 1. Categorisation of CVD outcomes, comprising events, risk factors and biomarkers, adapted from (27)

CAD, coronary artery disease; HOMA-IR, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance; CRP, C-reactive protein; PAI-1, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1; IMT, intima media thickness.

Table 2. Characteristics and results of studies

↑, positive association; ↓, inverse association; ↔, no association; –, not examined; DGLA, dihomo-γ-linolenic acid; CAD, coronary artery disease; MI, myocardial infarction; LA, linoleic acid; AF, atrial fibrillation; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; TC, total cholesterol; FG, fasting glucose; FSI, fasting serum insulin; HOMA-IR, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance; AA, arachidonic acid; ALA,α-linolenic acid; WC, waist circumference; J, Japanese; K, Korean; IL-1ra, IL-1 receptor agonist; IP-10, inducible protein-10; MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; CRP, C-reactive protein; PAI-1, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1; CAC, coronary artery calcification; AoCaS, aortic calcification score; CDS, CAC density score; IMT, intima media thickness.

PUFA biomarkers and CVD events

A prospective cohort study (median 9·6 years) from Taiwan by Chien et al. observed no association between plasma EPA, DHA and a composite of CVD events, which included non-fatal MI, fatal CHD, hospitalisation due to percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary bypass surgery and stroke(Reference Chien, Lin and Hsu28). For coronary artery disease, which included MI, angina pectoris and cardiac death, Chei et al. found no associations with serum n-3 PUFA in a prospective case–control study(Reference Chei, Yamagishi and Kitamura29). However, total n-6 and LA were inversely associated with coronary artery disease(Reference Chei, Yamagishi and Kitamura29).

Sun L et al. found inverted–U shape curve associations of erythrocyte EPA with total stroke and ischaemic stroke with a threshold at EPA level of 0·70 %(Reference Sun, Du and Zong30). A higher level of erythrocyte DGLA was associated with a higher risk of total stroke and ischaemic stroke(Reference Sun, Du and Zong30). However, LA was inversely associated with ischaemic stroke and positively associated with intracerebral haemorrhage(Reference Sun, Du and Zong30).

For atrial fibrillation, a case–control study from Japan showed EPA was marginally positively associated, but DHA and AA were not associated(Reference Tomita, Hata and Takeuchi31). For total (fatal + non-fatal) MI, two prospective case–control studies from Singapore observed inverse associations with plasma total n-3 PUFA, EPA and DHA(Reference Sun, Koh and Choi32,Reference Sun, Koh and Yuan33) . On the contrary, a prospective case–control study from a Japanese cohort, which is characterised by very high n-3 PUFA intakes, found no associations between plasma total n-3 PUFA, EPA, DHA, DPA and MI(Reference Hamazaki, Iso and Eshak34). No association was found between ALA and MI(Reference Sun, Koh and Yuan33). Analysis of specific n-6 PUFA showed that AA was positively associated with MI, but no association was found between LA and MI(Reference Sun, Koh and Choi32).

In general, there appeared to be an inverse association between total n-3, EPA and DHA and MI, but not in populations characterised by very high n-3 PUFA intakes. Inconclusive associations between n-3 PUFA and other CVD events were observed. Also, inconclusive associations between n-6 PUFA and CVD events in Asian populations were observed.

PUFA biomarkers and traditional risk factors

For blood pressure, two cross-sectional studies from China (average age 57 years old) reported an inverse association with total n-3 PUFA(Reference Huang, Shou and Cai35,Reference Zeng, Sun and Liu36) . However, a smaller cross-sectional study with younger Singaporean participants (∼39 years old) found no association between plasma total n-3 PUFA and blood pressure(Reference Bi, Yeo and Loo37). Furthermore, Huang et al. found no associations between specific n-3 PUFA, EPA, DHA, DPA and blood pressure(Reference Huang, Shou and Cai35). In a prospective study, Zeng et al. reported a marginal inverse association between erythrocyte total n-3 PUFA and blood pressure over a mean period of 3·09 years(Reference Zeng, Sun and Liu36). Also, prospectively, EPA, DHA and DPA were found to be inversely associated with blood pressure, while ALA was not associated with blood pressure(Reference Zeng, Sun and Liu36).

In relation to n-6 PUFA, total n-6 PUFA were found to be inversely associated with blood pressure in a cross-sectional study of Chinese participants from China(Reference Zeng, Sun and Liu36). However, in two other smaller cross-sectional studies, no associations were found(Reference Huang, Shou and Cai35,Reference Bi, Yeo and Loo37) . Furthermore, Huang et al. reported no associations between specific n-6 PUFA, AA and LA and blood pressure(Reference Huang, Shou and Cai35). Prospectively, there were no associations between total n-6 PUFA and blood pressure(Reference Zeng, Sun and Liu36). In general, there appeared to be an inverse association between total n-3 PUFA and blood pressure, while mixed results were found for total n-6 PUFA and blood pressure. However, it is recognised that the number of studies available is limited and is mostly cross-sectional in design, which means that the direction of causality cannot be inferred.

For TC, the cross-sectional study from Singapore found an inverse association with plasma total n-3 PUFA and EPA(Reference Bi, Yeo and Loo37). Similarly, a cross-sectional study from India found that serum total n-3 PUFA (EPA + DHA) was inversely associated with TC and TC:HDL-cholesterol ratio(Reference Gupta, Lakshmy and Abraham38). Only the Singapore study examined TC and LDL-cholesterol with plasma n-6 PUFA and found that plasma total n-6 PUFA and LA were inversely associated with TC(Reference Bi, Yeo and Loo37). For LDL-cholesterol, the study from Singapore found inverse associations with plasma total n-6 PUFA, LA and AA(Reference Bi, Yeo and Loo37). For TAG, the cross-sectional study from Singapore found an inverse association with EPA, total n-6 PUFA and LA(Reference Bi, Yeo and Loo37). A similar inverse association was found between EPA + DHA, LA and TAG in the study from India(Reference Gupta, Lakshmy and Abraham38). Furthermore, plasma total n-6 PUFA and LA were positively associated with HDL-cholesterol in the study from Singapore(Reference Bi, Yeo and Loo37).

Only one cross-sectional study in Singapore investigated the association of plasma total n-3 and n-6 PUFA with fasting blood glucose, fasting serum insulin and homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance, but no associations were observed(Reference Bi, Yeo and Loo37).

In general, there appeared to be a beneficial effect of EPA + DHA and EPA on TC and TAG. A similar beneficial effect was also observed for total n-6 PUFA, especially LA, on blood lipids.

PUFA biomarkers and physical signs

For aortic/arterial stiffness, a cross-sectional study in Korean middle-aged males found inverse associations with serum total n-3 PUFA and EPA, whereas no association was found with DHA(Reference Sekikawa, Shin and Masaki39). Another larger study in Japanese middle-aged males found no association between serum total n-3 PUFA, EPA and DHA and arterial stiffness(Reference Tomiyama, Matsumoto and Odaira40). As for specific n-6 PUFA, AA and DGLA were found to be positively associated with arterial stiffness(Reference Tomiyama, Matsumoto and Odaira40).

For obesity, the cross-sectional study from India reported an inverse association between serum ALA and BMI(Reference Gupta, Lakshmy and Abraham38). In a cross-sectional study from Singapore, no association was found between plasma total n-3 PUFA and both waist circumference and fat mass, but for total n-6 PUFA, an inverse association was found with waist circumference but not fat mass(Reference Bi, Yeo and Loo37). In general, findings were mixed, and the limited studies found no consistent associations between PUFA biomarkers and aortic stiffness and obesity in Asian populations.

PUFA biomarkers and non-traditional lipid markers

Only one cross-sectional study examined associations between serum n-6 PUFA and VLDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and HDL-cholesterol subclasses, and this involved Japanese and Korean males aged 40–49(Reference Choo, Ueshima and Curb41). Total n-6 PUFA, AA and LA showed an inverse association with total, large and medium VLDL-cholesterol particle concentrations and a positive association with small VLDL-cholesterol particle concentrations. A similar inverse association was also observed with total and small LDL-cholesterol particle concentrations and a positive association with large LDL-cholesterol particle concentrations. In contrast, total n-6 PUFA and LA showed a positive association with large HDL-cholesterol particle concentrations and an inverse association with medium and small HDL-cholesterol particle concentrations. Associations between n-3 PUFA and lipoprotein subclasses were not examined.

PUFA biomarkers and markers of inflammation

Three cross-sectional studies from Japan investigated the associations between n-3 and n-6 PUFA and CRP(Reference Tomiyama, Matsumoto and Odaira40,Reference El-Saed, Masaki and Okamura42,Reference Kubota, Higashiyama and Imano43) . Only one study from Japan reported an inverse association between total n-3 PUFA, EPA, DHA and CRP in 40–74 years old male and female participants(Reference Kubota, Higashiyama and Imano43). In contrast, no associations between total n-3 PUFA, EPA, DHA and CRP were reported in two other studies with relatively younger male participants(Reference Tomiyama, Matsumoto and Odaira40,Reference El-Saed, Masaki and Okamura42) . Two studies reported an inverse association between serum total n-6 PUFA, LA and CRP in both males and females(Reference El-Saed, Masaki and Okamura42,Reference Kubota, Higashiyama and Imano43) .

Only one cross-sectional study from Japan examined proinflammatory cytokines and found an inverse association between total n-3 PUFA and IL-8(Reference Sekikawa, Kadowaki and Curb44). No associations were found with the other proinflammatory cytokines.

In general, total n-3 PUFA (EPA and DHA), individual EPA and DHA were found to have an inverse association with CRP in older populations. Also, total n-3 PUFA were inversely associated with IL-8. Additionally, total n-6 PUFA (LA, DGLA, γ-linolenic acid and AA) and LA were found to have an inverse association with CRP.

PUFA biomarkers and markers of haemostasis and thrombosis

Two cross-sectional studies examined the association between serum n-3 or n-6 PUFA and biomarkers related to blood clotting in Japanese males aged 40–49(Reference Hassen, Ueshima and Curb45,Reference Lee, Curb and Kadowaki46) . One study observed inverse associations between total n-3 PUFA (EPA + DHA + DPA) and plasma fibrinogen(Reference Hassen, Ueshima and Curb45). In the other study, similar inverse associations were observed between total n-6 PUFA, AA and LA and plasma PAI-1(Reference Lee, Curb and Kadowaki46).

PUFA biomarkers and non-invasive imaging-based biomarkers

In Japanese, total n-3 PUFA and EPA were not associated with CAC score, CAC density score(Reference Sekikawa, Mahajan and Kadowaki47) and aortic calcification score(Reference Mahajan, Choo and Masaki48). Analysis of the DHA level showed an inverse association with the CAC score(Reference Sekikawa, Mahajan and Kadowaki47), but no association was found between the CAC density score(Reference Sekikawa, Mahajan and Kadowaki47) and aortic calcification score(Reference Mahajan, Choo and Masaki48).

For carotid IMT, no associations were found with total n-3 PUFA and EPA, but an inverse association was found with DHA(Reference Sekikawa, Kadowaki and El-Saed49,Reference Dai, Zhang and Wang50) . ALA was inversely associated with carotid IMT in the Chinese population from China(Reference Dai, Zhang and Wang50), but not in the Japanese population(Reference Sekikawa, Kadowaki and El-Saed49). Analysis of specific n-6 PUFA showed that AA and LA were not associated with carotid IMT in the Japanese(Reference Sekikawa, Kadowaki and El-Saed49). In general, no associations were found between total n-3 PUFA, EPA and non-invasive imaging-based biomarkers. Some associations were observed for DHA and circulating n-6 PUFA biomarkers with imaging-based biomarkers, but findings were inconsistent, and studies were limited.

Risk of bias assessment

All sixteen cross-sectional studies were assessed to be of fair quality, mainly due to poor scoring under the selection domain, where sample size justification and reporting of non-respondents were lacking despite a representative sample and validated ascertainment of exposures (Table 3). Comparability and outcome domain scores were graded with good scores as potential confounders were controlled, assessments of outcomes were objective and appropriate statistical tests and reporting were conducted.

Table 3. Quality assessment of included studies using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale

*This study consists of a cross-sectional and prospective cohort component.

The three cohort studies were assessed to be good quality, with good scores across the selection, comparability and outcome domains (Table 3). The selection was representative of the exposed cohort, the non-exposed cohort was drawn from the same community as the exposed, ascertainment of exposure was through the secure record and the outcome of interest was not present at the start of study. Potential confounders were controlled. Outcome assessment was either independent or blind or through record linkage/clinical record, and follow-up was assessed to be long enough.

Four out of five case–control studies were assessed to be of good quality (Table 3). The remaining case–control study was assessed to be of poor quality mainly due to poor comparability from the lack of information on confounders that were adjusted for. Selection domain scores were graded well as case definitions were adequate, cases were representative, community controls were used and controls had no history of outcomes. For the exposure domain, although ascertainment of exposures was through secure records and the same method of ascertainment was used for cases and controls, all five studies did not report on the non-response rate.

Discussion

We performed a systematic literature review on the associations between n-3, n-6 PUFA biomarkers and cardiovascular risk factors and events in healthy Asian populations. We observed higher circulating total n-3 PUFA to be associated with lower hypertension risk and specifically EPA and DHA to be associated with lower MI risk, reduction in TAG and inflammation. Higher circulating LA was associated with improved lipid profiles and lower inflammation. No consistent associations were observed for circulating n-3 and n-6 PUFA biomarkers with arterial stiffness, obesity, thrombosis and imaging-based biomarkers. Associations between circulating n-6 PUFA biomarkers and CVD events and blood pressure were inconclusive. To our knowledge, this is the first study to review the associations between circulating n-3 and n-6 PUFA biomarkers and cardiovascular risk factors and events specifically in healthy Asian populations.

This review suggested that total plasma n-3, EPA and DHA lowered the risk of total (fatal + non-fatal) MI in Asian populations. This finding is in line with a meta-analysis of nineteen cohort studies mainly from Western countries, which examined the relationship between EPA or DHA concentrations (such as plasma, serum, erythrocytes or adipose tissue) in healthy adults at the start of the study and the risk of developing CHD, including MI(Reference Del Gobbo, Imamura and Aslibekyan51). Upper quintiles of EPA and DHA were associated with a lower risk of non-fatal MI (quintile 5 v. quintile 1 comparison: RR, 0·71 (95 % CI, 0·56, 0·90) v. 0·87 (95 % CI, 0·78, 0·97))(Reference Del Gobbo, Imamura and Aslibekyan51). Supplementation studies also found positive effects of n-3 PUFA on MI as summarised in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trial (RCT)(Reference Hu, Hu and Manson52Reference Khan, Lone and Khan55). It is noted that the high circulating n-3 PUFA levels in Japanese may reach the plateau level where the associations between circulating n-3 PUFA and the risk of MI cannot be detected. One challenge with CVD events is that they are collected in a variety of ways, depending on the study. Further large cohort studies with larger variability of exposure and high-quality trials in Asian populations are required to evaluate the detailed effects of circulating n-3 PUFA on specific CVD events.

As for n-6 PUFA, only one study found plasma AA to be positively associated with MI in this review. This corroborates with an Israel case–control study, which found that adipose tissue AA was positively associated with acute MI(Reference Kark, Kaufmann and Binka56). Another Danish case–control study also found a positive association between adipose tissue AA levels and MI(Reference Nielsen, Schmidt and Stegger57). AA, derived from the intake of animal foods (e.g. meat, egg and fish), is one of the major dietary long-chain n-6 PUFA. One possible mechanism is that AA and its metabolite thromboxane A2 and prostaglandins may stimulate the formation and secretion of testosterone, which is increasingly recognised as related to MI and heart failure in men(Reference Zhang, Zhao and Schooling58). Further research is warranted to elucidate the effects of AA on MI in Asian populations.

Only one study examined the associations between n-3 PUFA and stroke risks in Asian populations. Interestingly, this study found a threshold at the EPA level of 0·70 % by the restricted cubic splines analysis, with inverse associations observed with total stroke and ischaemic stroke above this level. Given the low consumption of marine n-3 PUFA among Chinese and the large variation in n-3 PUFA levels in Asian populations(Reference Schuchardt, Beinhorn and Hu59), this would reflect the importance to identify an ideal EPA level for cardio-metabolic health. Evidence linking circulating levels of n-3 PUFA with stroke risk in Asian populations is very limited, with only one study found. In Asian populations who had higher stroke rates and substantially different dietary patterns compared with Western populations(Reference Turana, Tengkawan and Chia60), further larger studies are needed to elucidate these associations.

A beneficial association between total n-3 PUFA and blood pressure was found in Asian populations. This is in line with two prospective nested case–control studies in Western populations, which found that circulating total n-3 PUFA were inversely associated with the incidence of elevated blood pressure(Reference Wang, Tsai and Manson61,Reference Warensjö, Sundström and Lind62) . This is also supported by a recent umbrella meta-analysis in 2022, which reported a significant inverse relationship between n-3 PUFA supplementation and both systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure(Reference Musazadeh, Kavyani and Naghshbandi63). Subgroup analysis showed that the inverse relationship holds true for healthy populations(Reference Musazadeh, Kavyani and Naghshbandi63), though the relationship was more significant in subgroups at higher risk of CVD(Reference Guo, Li and Li64,Reference Zhang, Ritonja and Zhou65) . Similarly, a meta-analysis of RCT showed that supplementation with EPA significantly reduced systolic blood pressure, while supplementation with DHA significantly reduced diastolic blood pressure(Reference Guo, Li and Li64). It is possible that n-3 PUFA improve large artery elasticity through their effects of lowering blood pressure via vasodilation, for example, by enhancing nitric oxide production or release(Reference Bercea, Cottrell and Tamagnini66). Furthermore, the vasodilatory effects of n-3 PUFA on vascular smooth muscle cells are mediated via the opening of ion channels, such as calcium-activated potassium channels and ATP-sensitive potassium channels, resulting in hyperpolarisation and relaxation(Reference Bercea, Cottrell and Tamagnini66). With regard to the associations between specific circulating n-3 PUFA and blood pressure in Asian populations, there is presently no current convincing supporting evidence, and more studies are warranted.

This review suggested circulating n-3 PUFA, specifically EPA and DHA, can significantly reduce blood TAG levels in Asian populations. There is a lack of comparable observational studies examining the associations between circulating n-3 PUFA and TAG levels in healthy Western populations. However, our findings are in line with RCT, which found that EPA or DHA supplementation (> 2 g/d) lowered TAG concentration, with DHA having a greater TAG-lowering effect(Reference Innes and Calder67). The American Heart Association recommended that 4 g/d of n-3 PUFA, specifically EPA and DHA together or EPA alone, is clinically useful as monotherapy or in addition to other therapies to reduce TAG(Reference Skulas-Ray, Wilson and Harris68). Possible mechanisms related to a reduction in plasma TAG by EPA and DHA could be through reduced hepatic lipogenesis and VLDL-cholesterol production and increased chylomicron lipolysis(Reference Bornfeldt69).

This review found an inverse association between circulating LA and TAG, TC and LDL-cholesterol and a positive association with HDL-cholesterol in Asian populations. Also, serum LA was found to be inversely associated with large VLDL-cholesterol, VLDL-cholesterol size, total and small LDL-cholesterol particle concentrations and positively associated with large HDL-cholesterol particle concentration and HDL-cholesterol size. In line with our findings, in an observational study from Finland, serum total n-6 PUFA and LA were inversely correlated with TAG and VLDL-cholesterol particle size(Reference Jelenkovic, Bogl and Rose70). A meta-analysis of RCT found a significant reduction in TC and LDL-cholesterol in studies that employed LA supplementation compared with SFA and monounsaturated fatty acid supplementation(Reference Wang, Zhang and Jin71). Similarly, a systematic review of RCT evaluated the effects of replacing 1 % of energy from SFA with n-6 PUFA, predominantly LA, and the results indicated reductions in TAG and LDL-cholesterol(Reference Mensink72). Some biochemical studies have been performed and suggested several pathways through which LA might exert its cholesterol-lowering actions. n-6 PUFA have been shown to reduce hepatic lipogenesis and concurrently activate lipid catabolism in vitro, likely via an inhibition of the activity of sterol regulatory element binding protein-1 in the liver(Reference Takeuchi, Yahagi and Izumida73).

Inverse associations between total serum n-3 (EPA and DHA), individual EPA and DHA and CRP were found in an older Asian population (mean age 58 years old), but no associations in a younger Asian population were found. Similarly, in an epidemiological study of 1123 healthy Italian older subjects (mean age 68·2 years old), higher plasma total n-3 PUFA were independently associated with lower levels of proinflammatory markers (IL-6, IL-1 receptor agonist, TNFα, CRP) and higher levels of anti-inflammatory markers (soluble IL-6r, IL-10, TGF-β) independent of confounders(Reference Ferrucci, Cherubini and Bandinelli74). Another cross-sectional study in older Australian men and women (mean age 77·6 years old) demonstrated a negative association between erythrocyte membrane EPA and DHA and CRP(Reference Olliver, Veysey and Lucock75). A meta-analysis provided consistent evidence that marine-derived n-3 PUFA supplementation had a significant lowering effect on fasting blood levels of CRP, IL-6 and TNF-α in healthy subjects(Reference Li, Huang and Zheng4). These studies lend further support for the protective role of n-3 PUFA against systematic inflammation in healthy older populations.

Regarding the associations between circulating n-6 PUFA and CRP, the findings from this review in Asian populations supported the anti-inflammatory effect of n-6 PUFA, especially LA, in Western populations. This is in line with a cross-sectional study that suggested that both serum total n-6 PUFA and LA, the predominant n-6 PUFA, were associated with lower CRP in Finnish men(Reference Virtanen, Mursu and Voutilainen76). Conversely, no relationship was found between plasma concentrations of LA and eight markers of inflammation: IL-6, soluble IL-6 receptor, IL-1β, IL-1 receptor antagonist, TNF-α, IL-10, TGF-β and CRP in an epidemiological study of 1123 Italian subjects(Reference Ferrucci, Cherubini and Bandinelli74). However, interestingly, those subjects in the lowest quartile of plasma LA concentration had the highest proinflammatory IL-6 and CRP concentrations and the lowest anti-inflammatory IL-10 and TGF-β concentrations(Reference Ferrucci, Cherubini and Bandinelli74). Contrary to popular belief, current evidence from RCT and observational studies in healthy human adults have found that increased intake of LA does not increase the concentrations of many inflammatory markers(Reference Fritsche77,Reference Innes and Calder78) . Indeed, epidemiological studies have even suggested that LA may be linked to reduced inflammation, though further analysis, specifically in Asian populations, is needed.

One study from our review suggested that total n-3 PUFA and EPA, but not DHA, has favourable effects on arterial stiffness(Reference Sekikawa, Shin and Masaki39). Past research that also measured arterial stiffness via carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, the gold standard measurement for arterial stiffness(Reference Laurent, Cockcroft and Van Bortel79), had shown inverse associations of plasma n-3 PUFA(Reference Kaess, Harris and Lacey80,Reference Reinders, Murphy and Song81) or n-3 supplementation(Reference Pase, Grima and Sarris82,Reference Monahan, Feehan and Blaha83) with arterial stiffness, in line with the findings in Koreans from this review(Reference Sekikawa, Shin and Masaki39). It is noted that the study from Japan in this review(Reference Tomiyama, Matsumoto and Odaira40) used brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity. The difference in the method of outcome measurement could be the reason that this paper from Japan did not find any association between EPA, DHA and arterial stiffness. One study from our review suggested that AA contributed to arterial stiffness(Reference Tomiyama, Matsumoto and Odaira40). However, a larger US prospective cohort study did not find a significant correlation between AA levels in erythrocytes with arterial stiffness(Reference Kaess, Harris and Lacey80). Another prospective cohort study in older adults in Iceland also did not find an association between plasma AA and arterial stiffness(Reference Reinders, Murphy and Song84). The association between n-3, n-6 PUFA and arterial stiffness appeared inconclusive and further studies are warranted.

In this review, total n-3 PUFA were found to be inversely associated with plasma fibrinogen. Fibrinogen plays an important role in the formation of fibrin, which stabilises blood clots. High plasma fibrinogen levels are associated with increased blood clots and, in turn, increased risk for MI(Reference DiNicolantonio and OKeefe85,Reference Adili, Hawley and Holinstat86) . A meta-analysis of fifteen RCT in humans has confirmed that n-3 PUFA supplementation inhibits platelet aggregation(Reference Gao, Cao and Mao7). This is generally in line with findings that n-3 PUFA reduce coagulation and thrombosis(Reference DiNicolantonio and OKeefe85). Regarding n-6 PUFA, the inverse associations between serum total n-6 PUFA, AA, LA and plasma PAI-1 found in this review were inconsistent with past studies, which found a positive association between AA and PAI-1(Reference Byberg, Smedman and Vessby87) and no association between LA and PAI-1.(Reference Johnson and Fritsche88). A decrease in plasma PAI-1 could lead to a decrease in blocking of tissue-plasminogen activator, leading to increased clot breakdown and eventually reducing blood clots(Reference Sillen and Declerck89). Further research on the associations between PUFA biomarkers and markers of thrombosis in Asian populations is necessary to verify the current findings.

This review suggested that DHA is protective against atherosclerosis through mechanisms reflected by carotid IMT and CAC score(Reference Sekikawa, Mahajan and Kadowaki47,Reference Sekikawa, Kadowaki and El-Saed49,Reference Dai, Zhang and Wang50) , whereas total n-3 PUFA and EPA were not associated with any of the non-invasive imaging-based markers, such as CAC score, CAC density score, aortic calcification score and carotid IMT(Reference Sekikawa, Mahajan and Kadowaki47,Reference Sekikawa, Kadowaki and El-Saed49,Reference Dai, Zhang and Wang50) . This may suggest that DHA may be more anti-atherogenic than EPA. However, no comparable studies exist that examined the association between DHA and the various non-invasive imaging-based atherosclerosis markers. More research is needed to ascertain the relationship between circulating individual PUFA and the various non-invasive imaging-based biomarkers in healthy populations.

This systematic review has several strengths. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review on the association of n-3 and n-6 biomarkers with cardiovascular events and risk factors in healthy Asian populations. This review focused on PUFA biomarkers that provided objective measures of different individual n-3 and n-6 PUFA. The review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, and the protocol was registered in PROSPERO. A literature search was done comprehensively in four scientific databases and supplemented by hand searching. Some limitations are worth noting. Due to the heterogeneity of the limited studies identified, a meta-analysis could not be performed. Nonetheless, this review can be valuable in understanding the latest research that has been done in this target population and where future research needs to focus on. Second, as only a limited number of studies for each cardiovascular risk factor/event were identified, findings on a particular outcome may not be generalisable to all Asian populations, and readers should approach the analysis of our findings with caution. Third, there is a lack of studies examining the associations between total and individual n-6 PUFA and cardiovascular risk factors and events in healthy Asian populations, resulting in inconclusive associations. Fourth, the high circulating n-3 PUFA levels in certain populations, such as the Japanese, may reach the plateau level where the associations between circulating n-3 PUFA and risk of any CVD events cannot be detected. Fifth, most of the studies included used cross-sectional design; hence, the possibility of reverse-causality bias could not be eliminated. Last, as a limitation of observational studies, residual confounding cannot be ruled out despite adjusting for various known confounders.

Recommendations for future research

For studies that examined n-3 PUFA, the majority focused on total n-3, EPA and DHA. Despite DPA and ALA being present in smaller amounts in the human diet, studies have suggested that DPA and ALA have beneficial effects on CVD(Reference Reinders, Murphy and Song81,Reference Skulas-Ray, Flock and Richter90Reference Sala-Vila, Fleming and Kris-Etherton93) . Hence, there could be value for future studies to also examine the role of DPA and ALA on CVD. Future studies should focus more on n-6 PUFA and their associations with CVD outcomes. Also, this review highlights the need for more longitudinal studies examining the long-term associations between circulating PUFA and CVD risk factors in Asian populations. It was observed that the definitions of ‘total n-3 PUFA’ used in studies in this review were not standardised. While some studies included only EPA and DHA, others also included DPA, ALA or other fatty acids or did not explicitly clarify the composition. Future studies should clearly define the composition of ‘total n-3 PUFA’ to ensure consistency and comparability across studies. This applies to ‘total n-6 PUFA’ as well. Selective reporting bias was found in several studies, where non-significant findings could only be found in data tables or supplementary info. It is proposed that studies at least briefly report non-significant findings in the main paper to avoid giving the false impression that certain exposures were not studied, when in fact no significant associations were found. Future studies should compare the actual levels of PUFA biomarkers composition in different blood components (whole blood, serum, plasma or erythrocyte) or adipose tissue in Asian populations with those from comparable studies in Western populations when more studies become available. Quality assessment using the NOS revealed that higher quality research papers are needed. Areas to take note in future studies include sample size justification and reporting of non-response rate.

Conclusion

Overall, we demonstrated that, similar to studies from the Western populations, higher circulating total n-3 PUFA were associated with lower hypertension risk, and specifically, EPA and DHA were associated with lower MI risk, reduction in TAG and inflammation. Higher circulating LA was associated with improved lipid profiles and lower inflammation. While significant results were observed for PUFA biomarkers (exposures) and cardiovascular risk factors and events (outcomes) in Asian populations, data were maximumly from three studies for each outcome contributing to the narrative synthesis, and therefore, results should be interpreted with caution. More high-quality and prospective studies on this topic in Asian populations are warranted.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Jason Loh for being the second reviewer for the updated search.

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

The authors’ responsibilities were as follows: Y. Q. L. and M. F.-F. C. designed the study; Y. Q. L. and K. H. T. planned the study and performed the initial literature search; Y. Q. L. and K. H T. identified eligible and included studies; Y. Q. L. and K. H. T. undertook data extraction and quality checking and wrote the manuscript; Y. Q. L., K. H. T. and M. F.-F. C. involved in checking the quality of extracted data, checking quality and consistency of the manuscript and writing of the final manuscript; and all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Footnotes

1 One study consisted of both a cross-sectional and prospective cohort component.

References

Global Burden of Disease Collaborative Network (2020) Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 (GBD 2019) Results. Seattle, United States: Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME).Google Scholar
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) (2015) GBD Compare. Seattle, WA: IHME, University of Washington.Google Scholar
AbuMweis, S, Jew, S, Tayyem, R, et al. (2018) Eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid containing supplements modulate risk factors for cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis of randomised placebo-control human clinical trials. J Hum Nutr Diet 31, 6784.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, K, Huang, T, Zheng, J, et al. (2014) Effect of marine-derived n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on C-reactive protein, interleukin 6 and tumor necrosis factor α: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 9, e88103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, PE, Van Elswyk, M & Alexander, DD (2014) Long-chain omega-3 fatty acids eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid and blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Hypertens 27, 885896.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ueshima, H, Stamler, J, Elliott, P, et al. (2007) Food omega-3 fatty acid intake of individuals (total, linolenic acid, long-chain) and their blood pressure: INTERMAP study. Hypertens 50, 313319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gao, LG, Cao, J, Mao, QX, et al. (2013) Influence of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid-supplementation on platelet aggregation in humans: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Atherosclerosis 226, 328334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, Y, Zhuang, P, He, W, et al. (2018) Association of fish and long-chain omega-3 fatty acids intakes with total and cause-specific mortality: prospective analysis of 421 309 individuals. J Internal Med 284, 399417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Innes, JK & Calder, PC (2020) Marine omega-3 (N-3) fatty acids for cardiovascular health: an update for 2020. Int J Mol Sci 21, 1362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abdelhamid, AS, Brown, TJ, Brainard, JS, et al. (2018) Omega-3 fatty acids for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7, Cd003177.Google ScholarPubMed
Jiang, H, Wang, L, Wang, D, et al. (2022) Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid biomarkers and risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and mortality. Clin Nutr 41, 17981807.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jang, H & Park, K (2020) Omega-3 and omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids and metabolic syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Nutr 39, 765773.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennett, G, Bardon, LA & Gibney, ER (2022) A comparison of dietary patterns and factors influencing food choice among ethnic groups living in one locality: a systematic review. Nutrients 14, 941.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, Y, Li, H, Lu, L, et al. (2016) Genome-wide meta-analyses identify novel loci associated with n-3 and n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acid levels in Chinese and European-ancestry populations. Hum Mol Genet 25, 12151224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, H, Gan, W, Lu, L, et al. (2013) A genome-wide association study identifies GRK5 and RASGRP1 as type 2 diabetes loci in Chinese Hans. Diabetes 62, 291298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luo, JQ, Ren, H, Liu, MZ, et al. (2018) European versus Asian differences for the associations between paraoxonase-1 genetic polymorphisms and susceptibility to type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Cell Mol Med 22, 17201732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hooper, L, Al-Khudairy, L, Abdelhamid, AS, et al. (2018) Omega-6 fats for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11, Cd011094.Google ScholarPubMed
Chowdhury, R, Warnakula, S, Kunutsor, S, et al. (2014) Association of dietary, circulating, and supplement fatty acids with coronary risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 160, 398406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marklund, M, Wu, JHY, Imamura, F, et al. (2019) Biomarkers of dietary omega-6 fatty acids and incident cardiovascular disease and mortality. Circulation 139, 24222436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shim, JS, Oh, K & Kim, HC (2014) Dietary assessment methods in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiol Health 36, e2014009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, KH, Polreis, JM, Tintle, NL, et al. (2019) Association of reported fish intake and supplementation status with the omega-3 index. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 142, 410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mozaffarian, D & Wu, JH (2012) (n-3) fatty acids and cardiovascular health: are effects of EPA and DHA shared or complementary? J Nutr 142, 614s625s.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, YQ, Tan, KH & Chong, M (2022) Biomarkers of Omega-3 and Omega-6 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids (PUFAs) and Associated Health Outcomes in Asian Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.Google Scholar
Moher, D, Liberati, A, Tetzlaff, J, et al. (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339, b2535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wells, GA, Wells, G, Shea, B, et al. (2014) The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses. Ottawa, Ontario: University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
Herzog, R, Álvarez-Pasquin, MJ, Díaz, C, et al. (2013) Are healthcare workers’ intentions to vaccinate related to their knowledge, beliefs and attitudes? A systematic review. BMC Public Health 13, 154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stampfer, MJ, Ridker, PM & Dzau, VJ (2004) Risk factor criteria. Circulation 109, Iv35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chien, KL, Lin, HJ, Hsu, HC, et al. (2013) Comparison of predictive performance of various fatty acids for the risk of cardiovascular disease events and all-cause deaths in a community-based cohort. Atherosclerosis 230, 140147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chei, CL, Yamagishi, K, Kitamura, A, et al. (2018) Serum fatty acid and risk of coronary artery disease - circulatory risk in communities study (CIRCS). Circ J 82, 30133020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, L, Du, H, Zong, G, et al. (2022) Associations of erythrocyte polyunsaturated fatty acids with incidence of stroke and stroke types in adult Chinese: a prospective study of over 8000 individuals. Eur J Nutr 61, 32353246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomita, T, Hata, T, Takeuchi, T, et al. (2013) High concentrations of omega-3 fatty acids are associated with the development of atrial fibrillation in the Japanese population. Heart Vessels 28, 497504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, Y, Koh, HW, Choi, H, et al. (2016) Plasma fatty acids, oxylipins, and risk of myocardial infarction: the Singapore Chinese Health Study. J Lipid Res 57, 13001307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, Y, Koh, WP, Yuan, JM, et al. (2016) Plasma α-linolenic and long-chain omega-3 fatty acids are associated with a lower risk of acute myocardial infarction in Singapore Chinese adults. J Nutr 146, 275282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamazaki, K, Iso, H, Eshak, ES, et al. (2018) Plasma levels of n-3 fatty acids and risk of coronary heart disease among Japanese: the Japan Public Health Center-based (JPHC) study. Atherosclerosis 272, 226232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, T, Shou, T, Cai, N, et al. (2012) Associations of plasma n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids with blood pressure and cardiovascular risk factors among Chinese. Int J Food Sci Nutr 63, 667673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeng, FF, Sun, LL, Liu, YH, et al. (2014) Higher erythrocyte n-3 PUFAs are associated with decreased blood pressure in middle-aged and elderly Chinese adults. J Nutr 144, 12401246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bi, X, Yeo, PLQ, Loo, YT, et al. (2019) Associations between circulating fatty acid levels and metabolic risk factors. J Nutr Intermediary Metab 15, 6569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, R, Lakshmy, R, Abraham, RA, et al. (2013) Serum omega-6/omega-3 ratio and risk markers for cardiovascular disease in an industrial population of Delhi. Food Nutr Sci 4, 9497.Google Scholar
Sekikawa, A, Shin, C, Masaki, KH, et al. (2013) Association of total marine fatty acids, eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids, with aortic stiffness in Koreans, whites, and Japanese Americans. Am J Hypertens 26, 13211327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomiyama, H, Matsumoto, C, Odaira, M, et al. (2011) Relationships among the serum omega fatty acid levels, serum C-reactive protein levels and arterial stiffness/wave reflection in Japanese men. Atherosclerosis 217, 433436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choo, J, Ueshima, H, Curb, JD, et al. (2010) Serum n-6 fatty acids and lipoprotein subclasses in middle-aged men: the population-based cross-sectional ERA-JUMP study. Am J Clin Nutr 91, 11951203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El-Saed, A, Masaki, K, Okamura, T, et al. (2016) The associations of c-reactive protein with serum levels of polyunsaturated fatty acids and trans fatty acids among middle-aged men from three populations. J Nutr Health Aging 20, 1621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kubota, Y, Higashiyama, A, Imano, H, et al. (2015) Serum polyunsaturated fatty acid composition and serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels in healthy Japanese residents: the KOBE study. J Nutr Health Aging 19, 719728.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sekikawa, A, Kadowaki, T, Curb, JD, et al. (2010) Circulating levels of 8 cytokines and marine n-3 fatty acids and indices of obesity in Japanese, white, and Japanese American middle-aged men. J Interferon Cytokine Res 30, 541548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hassen, LJ, Ueshima, H, Curb, JD, et al. (2012) Significant inverse association of marine n-3 fatty acids with plasma fibrinogen levels in Japanese in Japan but not in whites or Japanese Americans. Eur J Clin Nutr 66, 329335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, S, Curb, JD, Kadowaki, T, et al. (2012) Significant inverse associations of serum n-6 fatty acids with plasma plasminogen activator inhibitor-1. Br J Nutr 107, 567572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sekikawa, A, Mahajan, H, Kadowaki, S, et al. (2019) Association of blood levels of marine omega-3 fatty acids with coronary calcification and calcium density in Japanese men. Eur J Clin Nutr 73, 783792.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahajan, H, Choo, J, Masaki, K, et al. (2019) Serum long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and aortic calcification in middle-aged men: the population-based cross-sectional ERA-JUMP study. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 29, 837846.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sekikawa, A, Kadowaki, T, El-Saed, A, et al. (2011) Differential association of docosahexaenoic and eicosapentaenoic acids with carotid intima-media thickness. Stroke 42, 25382543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dai, XW, Zhang, B, Wang, P, et al. (2014) Erythrocyte membrane n-3 fatty acid levels and carotid atherosclerosis in Chinese men and women. Atherosclerosis 232, 7985.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Del Gobbo, LC, Imamura, F, Aslibekyan, S, et al. (2016) ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid biomarkers and coronary heart disease: pooling project of 19 cohort studies. JAMA Intern Med 176, 11551166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, Y, Hu, FB & Manson, JE (2019) Marine omega-3 supplementation and cardiovascular disease: an updated meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials involving 127 477 participants. J Am Heart Assoc 8, e013543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernasconi, AA, Wiest, MM, Lavie, CJ, et al. (2021) Effect of omega-3 dosage on cardiovascular outcomes: an updated meta-analysis and meta-regression of interventional trials. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 96, 304313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shen, S, Gong, C, Jin, K, et al. (2022) Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation and coronary heart disease risks: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. Front Nutr 9, 809311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khan, SU, Lone, AN, Khan, MS, et al. (2021) Effect of omega-3 fatty acids on cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine 38, 100997.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kark, JD, Kaufmann, NA, Binka, F, et al. (2003) Adipose tissue n-6 fatty acids and acute myocardial infarction in a population consuming a diet high in polyunsaturated fatty acids. Am J Clin Nutr 77, 796802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, MS, Schmidt, EB, Stegger, J, et al. (2013) Adipose tissue arachidonic acid content is associated with the risk of myocardial infarction: a Danish case-cohort study. Atherosclerosis 227, 386390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, T, Zhao, JV & Schooling, CM (2021) The associations of plasma phospholipid arachidonic acid with cardiovascular diseases: a Mendelian randomization study. EBioMedicine 63, 103189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schuchardt, JP, Beinhorn, P, Hu, XF, et al. (2024) Omega-3 world map: 2024 update. Prog Lipid Res 95, 101286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turana, Y, Tengkawan, J, Chia, YC, et al. (2021) Hypertension and stroke in Asia: a comprehensive review from HOPE Asia. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 23, 513521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L, Tsai, M, Manson, JE, et al. (2011) Erythrocyte fatty acid composition is associated with the risk of hypertension in middle-aged and older women. J Nutr 141, 16911697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warensjö, E, Sundström, J, Lind, L, et al. (2006) Factor analysis of fatty acids in serum lipids as a measure of dietary fat quality in relation to the metabolic syndrome in men. Am J Clin Nutr 84, 442448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musazadeh, V, Kavyani, Z, Naghshbandi, B, et al. (2022) The beneficial effects of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on controlling blood pressure: an umbrella meta-analysis. Front Nutr 9, 985451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guo, XF, Li, KL, Li, JM, et al. (2019) Effects of EPA and DHA on blood pressure and inflammatory factors: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 59, 33803393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, X, Ritonja, JA, Zhou, N, et al. (2022) Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids intake and blood pressure: a dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Am Heart Assoc 11, e025071.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bercea, C-I, Cottrell, GS, Tamagnini, F, et al. (2021) Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and hypertension: a review of vasodilatory mechanisms of docosahexaenoic acid and eicosapentaenoic acid. Br J Pharmacol 178, 860877.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Innes, JK & Calder, PC (2018) The differential effects of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid on cardiometabolic risk factors: a systematic review. Int J Mol Sci 19, 532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skulas-Ray, AC, Wilson, PWF, Harris, WS, et al. (2019) Omega-3 fatty acids for the management of hypertriglyceridemia: a science advisory from the American heart association. Circulation 140, e673e691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bornfeldt, KE (2021) Triglyceride lowering by omega-3 fatty acids: a mechanism mediated by N-acyl taurines. J Clin Invest 131, e147558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jelenkovic, A, Bogl, LH, Rose, RJ, et al. (2014) Association between serum fatty acids and lipoprotein subclass profile in healthy young adults: exploring common genetic and environmental factors. Atherosclerosis 233, 394402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Q, Zhang, H, Jin, Q, et al. (2023) Effects of dietary linoleic acid on blood lipid profiles: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 40 randomized controlled trials. Foods 12, 2129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mensink, RP (2016) Effects of Saturated Fatty Acids on Serum Lipids and Lipoproteins: A Systematic Review and Regression Analysis. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
Takeuchi, Y, Yahagi, N, Izumida, Y, et al. (2010) Polyunsaturated fatty acids selectively suppress sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1 through proteolytic processing and autoloop regulatory circuit. J Biol Chem 285, 1168111691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferrucci, L, Cherubini, A, Bandinelli, S, et al. (2006) Relationship of plasma polyunsaturated fatty acids to circulating inflammatory markers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91, 439446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olliver, M, Veysey, M, Lucock, M, et al. (2016) Erythrocyte omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid levels are associated with biomarkers of inflammation in older Australians. J Nutr Intermediary Metab 5, 6169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Virtanen, JK, Mursu, J, Voutilainen, S, et al. (2018) The associations of serum n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids with serum C-reactive protein in men: the Kuopio Ischaemic Heart disease risk factor study. Eur J Clin Nutr 72, 342348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fritsche, KL (2014) Linoleic acid, vegetable oils & inflammation. Mo Med 111, 4143.Google ScholarPubMed
Innes, JK & Calder, PC (2018) Omega-6 fatty acids and inflammation. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 132, 4148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laurent, S, Cockcroft, J, Van Bortel, L, et al. (2006) Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J 27, 25882605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaess, BM, Harris, WS, Lacey, S, et al. (2015) The relation of red blood cell fatty acids with vascular stiffness, cardiac structure and left ventricular function: the Framingham Heart Study. Vasc Med 20, 513.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reinders, I, Murphy, RA, Song, X, et al. (2015) Higher plasma phospholipid n–3 PUFAs, but lower n–6 PUFAs, are associated with lower pulse wave velocity among older adults1, 2, 3. J Nutr 145, 23172324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pase, MP, Grima, NA & Sarris, J (2011) Do long-chain n-3 fatty acids reduce arterial stiffness? A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br J Nutr 106, 974980.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monahan, KD, Feehan, RP, Blaha, C, et al. (2015) Effect of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation on central arterial stiffness and arterial wave reflections in young and older healthy adults. Physiol Rep 3, e12438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinders, I, Murphy, RA, Song, X, et al. (2015) Higher plasma phospholipid n-3 PUFAs, but lower n-6 PUFAs, are associated with lower pulse wave velocity among older adults. J Nutr 145, 23172324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DiNicolantonio, JJ & OKeefe, J (2019) Importance of maintaining a low omega-6/omega-3 ratio for reducing platelet aggregation, coagulation and thrombosis. Open Heart 6, e001011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adili, R, Hawley, M & Holinstat, M (2018) Regulation of platelet function and thrombosis by omega-3 and omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat 139, 1018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byberg, L, Smedman, A, Vessby, B, et al. (2001) Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and relations to fatty acid composition in the diet and in serum cholesterol esters. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 21, 20862092.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, GH & Fritsche, K (2012) Effect of dietary linoleic acid on markers of inflammation in healthy persons: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Acad Nutr Diet 112, 10291041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sillen, M & Declerck, PJ (2020) Targeting PAI-1 in cardiovascular disease: structural insights into PAI-1 functionality and inhibition. Front Cardiovasc Med 7, 622473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skulas-Ray, AC, Flock, MR, Richter, CK, et al. (2015) Red blood cell docosapentaenoic acid (DPA n-3) is inversely associated with triglycerides and c-reactive protein (CRP) in healthy adults and dose-dependently increases following n-3 fatty acid supplementation. Nutrients 7, 63906404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drouin, G, Rioux, V & Legrand, P (2019) The n-3 docosapentaenoic acid (DPA): a new player in the n-3 long chain polyunsaturated fatty acid family. Biochimie 159, 3648.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naghshi, S, Aune, D, Beyene, J, et al. (2021) Dietary intake and biomarkers of αlinolenic acid and risk of all cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of cohort studies. BMJ 375, n2213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sala-Vila, A, Fleming, J, Kris-Etherton, P, et al. (2022) Impact of α-linolenic acid, the vegetable ω-3 fatty acid, on cardiovascular disease and cognition. Adv Nutr 13, 15841602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) flow diagram of the study selection process.

Figure 1

Table 1. Categorisation of CVD outcomes, comprising events, risk factors and biomarkers, adapted from (27)

Figure 2

Table 2. Characteristics and results of studies

Figure 3

Table 3. Quality assessment of included studies using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale